I installed the Infused 1.5.3 ROM on my Samsung Infuse 4G.
I've been looking around at the kernels, and I was just wondering if the one that goes with Infused 1.5.3 is fine as-is or if there's a more stable one that also provides better battery life and speed.
Stay with what I've got, or go with a different one?
Most people are happy with the kernel thats included in the phone already but custom kernels provide much more options as far as battery life, over/underclocking, over/undervolting, the way the cpu treats the voltages. It is all in preference.
I Haz 3D!
knowledge561 said:
Most people are happy with the kernel thats included in the phone already but custom kernels provide much more options as far as battery life, over/underclocking, over/undervolting, the way the cpu treats the voltages. It is all in preference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the information, but I understand this much.
I'm more looking for the most stable custom Kernel for my model of phone, and if they even do much better than stock. (If it's worth even flashing.)
Khyrdantai said:
Thanks for the information, but I understand this much.
I'm more looking for the most stable custom Kernel for my model of phone, and if they even do much better than stock. (If it's worth even flashing.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mostly all custom kernels are worth flashing. The hardest part is choosing so people usually flash 1 for a couple days to test out and flash another for the next couple of days and so on.
I Haz 3D!
Khyrdantai said:
Thanks for the information, but I understand this much.
I'm more looking for the most stable custom Kernel for my model of phone, and if they even do much better than stock. (If it's worth even flashing.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gtg rom infused will install his.custom kernel thats what id go with. Good batt life. If u want overclock and undervolt go with infusion
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA Premium App
I hear that Bionic Kernel is pretty darn snappy and sweet . Just saying.
Nopcodex90 said:
I hear that Bionic Kernel is pretty darn snappy and sweet . Just saying.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea it is very fast as well my two fans are yours nop and gtgs shoulda mentioned that
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA Premium App
Nopcodex90 said:
I hear that Bionic Kernel is pretty darn snappy and sweet . Just saying.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll look into it, but will Kernel flashing delete my data like ROM flashing did? I know it was from choosing the delete cache and data setting before I flashed, but do I have to do that this time? (Or is Kernel flashing super different?)
Khyrdantai said:
I'll look into it, but will Kernel flashing delete my data like ROM flashing did? I know it was from choosing the delete cache and data setting before I flashed, but do I have to do that this time? (Or is Kernel flashing super different?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kernel flashing doesnt delete data.
I Haz 3D!
knowledge561 said:
Kernel flashing doesnt delete data.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank god. Though it's not much trouble reinstalling apps so much as it is doing the entire setup process from scratch.
Right now there isn't much difference between the kernels out there except for gtg's Community Voodoo and Infusion OC/UV - over the past few weeks, most of the kernel devs have been cross-applying each other's patches.
GTG's kernel - Minimal changes, gtg has been focusing on ROMs/Gingerbread, handing off kernel work to others
Defuse kernel - This is one of the most mature kernels out there, LinuxBozo is a kickass kernel dev. It was the first one to have reasonably working BLN.
Infusion - Infusion carries about half of the enhancements present in Defuse in its current release and adds overclocking/undervolting. The next Infusion release (which is a bit overdue - bedwa had a crazy week) will contain everything present in Defuse except possibly for BLN, plus it has overclocking/undervolting.
None of the kernels really do anything to touch power management except for the Infusion undervolting code, so you shouldn't see any significant differences in battery life unless you run Infusion and undervolt.
Entropy512 said:
Right now there isn't much difference between the kernels out there except for gtg's Community Voodoo and Infusion OC/UV - over the past few weeks, most of the kernel devs have been cross-applying each other's patches.
GTG's kernel - Minimal changes, gtg has been focusing on ROMs/Gingerbread, handing off kernel work to others
Defuse kernel - This is one of the most mature kernels out there, LinuxBozo is a kickass kernel dev. It was the first one to have reasonably working BLN.
Infusion - Infusion carries about half of the enhancements present in Defuse in its current release and adds overclocking/undervolting. The next Infusion release (which is a bit overdue - bedwa had a crazy week) will contain everything present in Defuse except possibly for BLN, plus it has overclocking/undervolting.
None of the kernels really do anything to touch power management except for the Infusion undervolting code, so you shouldn't see any significant differences in battery life unless you run Infusion and undervolt.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright decided to go with Defuse. Thanks! <3
Related
Hey guys just wanted to share the kernel from my 1.4 rom. of course its not gunna be as fast on other roms as ive built it around my rom but i can pretty much guarantee it is faster than whats out. not in linpack but in speed.
this kernel overclocks to 1.3ghz but may not work for everyone considering everyones phone is different. (some people cant run 1.2!)
http://bakedsnackshack.com/source/herospecial.zip (lowest voltages for 1.3ghz)
http://bakedsnackshack.com/source/1.4.stock.zip (the stock kernel from baked 1.4)
source code: http://bakedsnackshack.com/source/sickybrapbraps.tar.gz (uploading)
oh and battery is very good
"i can pretty much guarantee it is faster than whats out. not in linpack but in speed"
Faster than ACS xtreme kernel?
KitsunePaws said:
"i can pretty much guarantee it is faster than whats out. not in linpack but in speed"
Faster than ACS xtreme kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I'm quite sure. Test their 1.6ghz versus my 1.0ghz. Tell me what you find. And 1.3 is just stupid fast
KitsunePaws said:
"i can pretty much guarantee it is faster than whats out. not in linpack but in speed"
Faster than ACS xtreme kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is faster than ASC xtreme on Baked Snack 1.4
And to be fair, I've only tested ASC xtreme on Baked Snack 1.4. I'm sure on Syndicate ROM, xtreme kernel performs better, just as herospecial probably performs better on Bakedsnack ROM.
mattallica76 said:
It is faster than ASC xtreme on Baked Snack 1.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not much of a surprise there... This kernel was built for Baked Snack, and our kernel was built for SyndicateROM!
mattallica76 said:
It is faster than ASC xtreme on Baked Snack 1.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should be faster on any rom. But there are many other tweaks to my rom making it the fastest on that
k0nane said:
Not much of a surprise there... This kernel was built for Baked Snack, and our kernel was built for SyndicateROM!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't get 1.4 kernel to work on syndacite rom..
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
mrkrabs said:
I can't get 1.4 kernel to work on syndacite rom..
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did it flash correctly? Must be dom additions they made in init.rc. will look into it. Try hersospecial just to be sure
To Mr. Herver
Could you please give me a link to your wallpaper you have on Baked Snack 1.3? I just love it!!
Hero_Over said:
Did it flash correctly? Must be dom additions they made in init.rc. will look into it. Try hersospecial just to be sure
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Given that init.rc is in the initramfs, and that your kernel should be/is overwriting it, that's probably not the issue. We did remove iqmsd after killing it in init.rc, but chances are that won't affect anything (unlike libiq_client.so and libiq_service.so, which remain).
k0nane said:
Given that init.rc is in the initramfs, and that your kernel should be/is overwriting it, that's probably not the issue. We did remove iqmsd after killing it in init.rc, but chances are that won't affect anything (unlike libiq_client.so and libiq_service.so, which remain).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not overwritin anything. Unless you have a pointless initramfs folder in your rom. I was saying that maybe your boot setup in init.rc may differ. Guess not but it sounds ramdisk related unless I uploaded the wrong file. Great work on acs by the way. Looks good
Hero_Over said:
Its not overwritin anything. Unless you have a pointless initramfs folder in your rom. I was saying that maybe your boot setup in init.rc may differ. Guess not but it sounds ramdisk related unless I uploaded the wrong file. Great work on acs by the way. Looks good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean SyndicateROM? ACS, the Android Creative Syndicate, is our team. But thank you, we're looking to continue to improve.
sniperkill said:
Could you please give me a link to your wallpaper you have on Baked Snack 1.3? I just love it!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ill include it with 1.4 which ill post soon!
Dude, if you want anyone to test your 1.4 kernel to prove a point, you need to post your 1.4 rom that goes along with It. For free.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
ericizzy1 said:
Dude, if you want anyone to test your 1.4 kernel to prove a point, you need to post your 1.4 rom that goes along with It. For free.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obviously you failed to read the last post I did lol
Hasn't anybody evn tried the kernel?
Will be looking forward
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Yes Herver, but since I like testing, I find myself flashing and trying different ROMs / kernel combinations on a weekly basis. I have to say, herospecial.zip (1.3 ghz @ stock voltage) was ridiculously fast and stable for me. I've also had the best battery life from Hero's ROMs, and 1.4 is no different. Currently, I'm testing out SyndicateROM which is running Devin's Xtreme kernel, and that is also very solid. Might keep it for a while unless I can't get good battery life like I used to get with yours. It all depends on preference, I really like your themed out ROMs too, but may play around with Syndicate for a bit. Even schizo's Epic Experience is something I test around in between all this as well.
I'm just glad we're finally getting to see the potential of this phone due to developers like yourselves. Much appreciated
"Im replying to a few posts up" just forgot to hit quote button, lol.Baked Snack rom does post his roms for free, he just gives his donators first dibbs.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
I'm running syndicate rom 1.0.1 bakedsnack special kernel wouldn't boot. Fix it and ill try again. I've used your rom before. Nice work hero.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
nimaim said:
Yes Herver, but since I like testing, I find myself flashing and trying different ROMs / kernel combinations on a weekly basis. I have to say, herospecial.zip (1.3 ghz @ stock voltage) was ridiculously fast and stable for me. I've also had the best battery life from Hero's ROMs, and 1.4 is no different. Currently, I'm testing out SyndicateROM which is running Devin's Xtreme kernel, and that is also very solid. Might keep it for a while unless I can't get good battery life like I used to get with yours. It all depends on preference, I really like your themed out ROMs too, but may play around with Syndicate for a bit. Even schizo's Epic Experience is something I test around in between all this as well.
I'm just glad we're finally getting to see the potential of this phone due to developers like yourselves. Much appreciated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much. I believe I've seen you on my forums. Any other takers. How does it do!
I have flashed all of the eagles blood Tom's even some other Tom's and they work with the exception. Of the new 1.05 eaglesblood that has Caucasian kernel cooked in. I tried flashing fauxs kernels separately and the only one that works is the stock voltage kernels eveeytime I try to do something that undervolts it wont take when I flash it. Is there any way to fix this or fwt it to work or does my g2x suck? Thanks for any help!
facadewithin said:
I have flashed all of the eagles blood Tom's even some other Tom's and they work with the exception. Of the new 1.05 eaglesblood that has Caucasian kernel cooked in. I tried flashing fauxs kernels separately and the only one that works is the stock voltage kernels eveeytime I try to do something that undervolts it wont take when I flash it. Is there any way to fix this or fwt it to work or does my g2x suck? Thanks for any help!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tom's...... Lol
Caucasian.... Lmao
More info...what rom you got?what kernel?what you trying to uv by?
G2X
facadewithin said:
I have flashed all of the eagles blood Tom's even some other Tom's and they work with the exception. Of the new 1.05 eaglesblood that has Caucasian kernel cooked in. I tried flashing fauxs kernels separately and the only one that works is the stock voltage kernels eveeytime I try to do something that undervolts it wont take when I flash it. Is there any way to fix this or fwt it to work or does my g2x suck? Thanks for any help!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
umm just turn in your g2x to someone that is qualified to use it.
What is a Caucasian kernel?
That ladies and gentlemen, is signature worthy.
Edit: Forgot to even answer your question amidst all this racial kernel profiling. Your G2x can't handle the OC/UV kernel, nothing you can do about it.
dligon said:
umm just turn in your g2x to someone that is qualified to use it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not that he's not qualified. A known issue is that some of the phone's can't support some of the features of other kernels so the phones won't boot. I started a thread about this and Faux chimed in affirming what I thought. It's a fault in the chip. Some can OC/UV, some can't.
Thanks hiko I thought I read something about that but what I don't get now is I flashed the Trinity kernel nd it sees the UV 1.1 in set CPU lol . Ill have to do more testing. As for the Caucasian kernel I blame racist correct lol
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
hiko36 said:
It's not that he's not qualified. A known issue is that some of the phone's can't support some of the features of other kernels so the phones won't boot. I started a thread about this and Faux chimed in affirming what I thought. It's a fault in the chip. Some can OC/UV, some can't.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup. I have this problem. My broken G2x can run custom kernels on Stock. But my replacement G2x can't even get past the boot screen after flashing one. I can't run EB Froyo, and I can't flash faux's kernel unless it's on a Gingerbread ROM. It's pretty lame.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
darbear5610 said:
Yup. I have this problem. My broken G2x can run custom kernels on Stock. But my replacement G2x can't even get past the boot screen after flashing one. I can't run EB Froyo, and I can't flash faux's kernel unless it's on a Gingerbread ROM. It's pretty lame.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah i wonder if getting another one would be any better though. im sure if i complain enough i could get a bvetter one, although the screen bleed on mine is actually pretty low compared to what ive seen so i might just hang on to it not sure
facadewithin said:
yeah i wonder if getting another one would be any better though. im sure if i complain enough i could get a bvetter one, although the screen bleed on mine is actually pretty low compared to what ive seen so i might just hang on to it not sure
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you get a replacement, nothing says you have to keep it. Feel free to send that one back.
Sent from my HTC Glacier
Dear OP. Wish I could help you. I do want to thank you for the laugh. Nothing personal. The typos made me spit out my coffee. It's been a long morning already, so I appreciate humor where I can find it.
As a couple have already said, not all phones are created equal. One of my phones would not OC and UV at the same time. I was able to hit 1300 stable on mine, but my wife, which has an identical setup, had issues at 1100. Faux released an overclock kernel without the undervolting. Have you tried that?
jcbofkc said:
Dear OP. Wish I could help you. I do want to thank you for the laugh. Nothing personal. The typos made me spit out my coffee. It's been a long morning already, so I appreciate humor where I can find it.
As a couple have already said, not all phones are created equal. One of my phones would not OC and UV at the same time. I was able to hit 1300 stable on mine, but my wife, which has an identical setup, had issues at 1100. Faux released an overclock kernel without the undervolting. Have you tried that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have not as the overclocking was not as big of an issue as undervolting was for me. I cant get a single of fauxs kernels to run etx/GB/FR thats does oc/uv but the stock one does it just fine thats goes 1.0sv/1.2oc. the whole reason why i am confused though is i flashed morfics trinity kernel thats oc/uv at the same rate 1.1uv/1.5oc and it loads perfectly fine on my phone. Setcpu sees the standard at 1.1ghz max on autodetect, howeer i have not tried overclocking to anything more than that as i do not have any experience with making the textfile for setcpu to overclock it manually. im going to work on this soon but im hoping someones already made and posted this elsewhere on xda =D
PS: im on a computer this time and ill say this is better than my blackberry who decided to autocorrect "heterosexual" in place of "hey" everytime i tried talking to one of my friends but glad its good for laughs lol
I've consistently gotten Morfic to work as well. Faux said that Morfic hasn't released his source so he can't compare notes and see what's causing the issue.
hiko36 said:
I've consistently gotten Morfic to work as well. Faux said that Morfic hasn't released his source so he can't compare notes and see what's causing the issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i hope he does soon as i would love to try fauxs kernel as i hear more about it than morfics. morfics for now works fanfriggintastic for me though. m g2x ocs to 1400 without any problems at all on morfics however has some stability issues randomly at 1500 and i undervolt it always under 1.1 by 75 and runs perfect. battery life is currently at 60% still after 30hrs of use even after phone calls texts and internet usage. no games or heavy downloads yet though. <3uv and juicedefender
Hi I am flashing this phone for a friend and I come from the Samsung Captivate so its fairly similar. Only question I have and I hope someone can help without flaming me is which Kernel would you suggest? Im going with Infused 1.5.2 as the rom and I am just curious what pairs with that best? Thanks in advance.
jivy26 said:
Hi I am flashing this phone for a friend and I come from the Samsung Captivate so its fairly similar. Only question I have and I hope someone can help without flaming me is which Kernel would you suggest? Im going with Infused 1.5.2 as the rom and I am just curious what pairs with that best? Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you're one of those "set it and forget it" types... i was incredibly pleased with the latest release of gtg's infusion 1.5.2 rom/kernel combo. very responsive, smooth and snappy. by far my favorite of all his releases to date for this phone.
if you're the type that likes to do a bit of fiddling for an ultimately rewarding end result, i recommend installing the above mentioned rom with bedwa's OC/UV kernel. i've had nothing but a smooth and stable experience with the two paired together. nothing but good things to say about both of these. having voodoo lagfix alone makes a huge difference. when you combine that with overclocking you get a device that feels much more awake and ready to perform. undervoltage allows you to use less battery power, even though the cpu is running at a higher frequency. really, makes a HUGE difference. cannot express how pleased i am with these two running together.
*i might also add that i've never installed any of the other roms. i have tried the defuse kernel with BLN was introduced(it has since been removed due to buggy issues).
bradbusa said:
if you're one of those "set it and forget it" types... i was incredibly pleased with the latest release of gtg's infusion 1.5.2 rom/kernel combo. very responsive, smooth and snappy. by far my favorite of all his releases to date for this phone.
if you're the type that likes to do a bit of fiddling for an ultimately rewarding end result, i recommend installing the above mentioned rom with bedwa's OC/UV kernel. i've had nothing but a smooth and stable experience with the two paired together. nothing but good things to say about both of these. having voodoo lagfix alone makes a huge difference. when you combine that with overclocking you get a device that feels much more awake and ready to perform. undervoltage allows you to use less battery power, even though the cpu is running at a higher frequency. really, makes a HUGE difference. cannot express how pleased i am with these two running together.
*i might also add that i've never installed any of the other roms. i have tried the defuse kernel with BLN was introduced(it has since been removed due to buggy issues).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was for a friend.so set it and forget it was my best option. He instantly noticed a speed improvement in the responsiveness using infusion. Thanks for the help.
Sent from my I897 using XDA Premium App
jivy26 said:
It was for a friend.so set it and forget it was my best option. He instantly noticed a speed improvement in the responsiveness using infusion. Thanks for the help.
Sent from my I897 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cool man. no problem. infused rom makes a world of difference in itself.
I've had the best battery life and stability on Infusion 1.5.0
Overclocked to 1.6, with the right undervolting i lost 3% battery over night (9+ hours)
I tried the 1.8 infusion but "OnDemand" stops working and thats my favorite setting so I went back to 1.5.0
I never had good luck with ondemand, along with most other users. Ondemand always FC'd on me
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk
okay soo i started off loving my tbolt. i ran bamf ginger remix for months without issues. i then changed to aosp and while i prefer it, many bugs and bad battery life are keeping me away.
so i went back to bamf and while i feel at home, i get alot of lag no matter what kernel i use. i need some advice on what to do and what rom is the fastest/lag free with the best kernel combo.
im dying here guys.
as far as setcpu settings i usually use ondemand or interactive no higher than 1228/245.
fixxxer2008 said:
okay soo i started off loving my tbolt. i ran bamf ginger remix for months without issues. i then changed to aosp and while i prefer it, many bugs and bad battery life are keeping me away.
so i went back to bamf and while i feel at home, i get alot of lag no matter what kernel i use. i need some advice on what to do and what rom is the fastest/lag free with the best kernel combo.
im dying here guys.
as far as setcpu settings i usually use ondemand or interactive no higher than 1228/245.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I can tell, the Ziggy kernel in the latest Gingeritis3D is the smoothest. Might be something newer in the synergy ROM, but I'm getting good battery life and things are nearly lag-free.
I am running OMFGB right now, and while I do prefer AOSP roms, the battery life isn't great. I have an extended battery so the battery life for me isn't an issue.
I agree with the previous post in regards to Gingeritis 3D. I had version VII installed, deleted almost all sense out with Tibu and used ADW EX. It was nice having some sense, lockscreen, pulldown, but that was all I really liked about sense. I oc'd to 1.4 and thought it ran great with excellent battery life.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
I haven't messed with uberBAMF yet. I understand it's a work in progess. I'm not sure what kernel it uses, but it might be worth giving a go. I'd love to think it's NOT a Ziggy or Imoseyon kernel just because I think Sense kernels NEED a LOT more attention.
im going to stick to bamf ginger remix until the theory 1.3x rom goes final. the newest ziggy kernel in synergy isn't very good imo, very laggy. i just extracted the gingeritis one and it's a kernel build from july, it's one of the better ziggy kernels. you know, the one from my thread that was removed. ill stick to it for the time being.
i just wish there were more stable aosp roms. no offense to cm7 or the devs, it's just not 100% yet and the battery life is ****, at least for me.
fixxxer2008 said:
im going to stick to bamf ginger remix until the theory 1.3x rom goes final. the newest ziggy kernel in synergy isn't very good imo, very laggy. i just extracted the gingeritis one and it's a kernel build from july, it's one of the better ziggy kernels. you know, the one from my thread that was removed. ill stick to it for the time being.
i just wish there were more stable aosp roms. no offense to cm7 or the devs, it's just not 100% yet and the battery life is ****, at least for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Ziggy's in Gingeritis3D is different than the Ziggy's in the older Gingeritis. The clock settings and smartass parameters are different. I think part of the reason that Ziggy kernel is as lagy as it is sometimes is because of his smartass governor parameters. I think if they were tweaked to be a little less stingy the phone might be much snappier. As it is, that kernel seems VERY reluctant to creep past 1 GHz, like the load requirement for stepping up is fairly high. I think it's ramp down is just a little too aggressive, and the period of load polling too long as well.
loonatik78 said:
The Ziggy's in Gingeritis3D is different than the Ziggy's in the older Gingeritis. The clock settings and smartass parameters are different. I think part of the reason that Ziggy kernel is as lagy as it is sometimes is because of his smartass governor parameters. I think if they were tweaked to be a little less stingy the phone might be much snappier. As it is, that kernel seems VERY reluctant to creep past 1 GHz, like the load requirement for stepping up is fairly high. I think it's ramp down is just a little too aggressive, and the period of load polling too long as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i meant i pulled it from gingeritis3d. that's the kernel your running, it's the one i posted last month.
fixxxer2008 said:
i meant i pulled it from gingeritis3d. that's the kernel your running, it's the one i posted last month.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You sure? This one just seems smoother.
loonatik78 said:
You sure? This one just seems smoother.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
almost 100%
fixxxer2008 said:
almost 100%
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure it is. I know that one didn't go up to 2GHz. It's definitely a similar build. The up_threshold on the smartass on that one you extracted seemed even more aggressive than this one. I had issues typing with it if I set the min_freq too low. I run this one at 122MHz without a problem.
Edit: Actually, I'm sure it's not. The one you extracted didn't have the camera fix for the new base Chingy used for beta 6 and 7.
loonatik78 said:
I'm not sure it is. I know that one didn't go up to 2GHz. It's definitely a similar build. The up_threshold on the smartass on that one you extracted seemed even more aggressive than this one. I had issues typing with it if I set the min_freq too low. I run this one at 122MHz without a problem.
Edit: Actually, I'm sure it's not. The one you extracted didn't have the camera fix for the new base Chingy used for beta 6 and 7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its from the same build date. its possible some other tweaks were added though. anyways im still open for suggestions guys.
fixxxer2008 said:
its from the same build date. its possible some other tweaks were added though. anyways im still open for suggestions guys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wouldn't be surprised knowing how he works.
I would recommend trying the uber bamf preview 3. I tested out preview 1 and it was by far the smoothest feeling ROM I've used and it also gave me the greatest battery life I've ever had on my Thunderbolt. They've fixed a few bugs since preview 1 so I'm sure it's even better now. It includes a stock kernel by the way.
You may also want to try the latest nightly Synergy ROM, it's what I'm on now. Performance has been pretty good and battery is okay. I have SetCPU at 1344/245 with lagfree.
DRGilroy said:
I would recommend trying the uber bamf preview 3. I tested out preview 1 and it was by far the smoothest feeling ROM I've used and it also gave me the greatest battery life I've ever had on my Thunderbolt. They've fixed a few bugs since preview 1 so I'm sure it's even better now. It includes a stock kernel by the way.
You may also want to try the latest nightly Synergy ROM, it's what I'm on now. Performance has been pretty good and battery is okay. I have SetCPU at 1344/245 with lagfree.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not a huge fan of synergy, i may give uber a whirl.
Go back to the stock released ROM (rooted, if you prefer to make things easier). That should be the baseline for everything.
mike.s said:
Go back to the stock released ROM (rooted, if you prefer to make things easier). That should be the baseline for everything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
naw... not into stock roms much but thanks.
fixxxer2008 said:
not a huge fan of synergy, i may give uber a whirl.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To make things a little easier for you...
uber-BAMF
fixxxer2008 said:
naw... not into stock roms much but thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then quit'yer'*****in. Throw a bunch of modified stuff into the mix, and you get what you pay for.
mike.s said:
Then quit'yer'*****in. Throw a bunch of modified stuff into the mix, and you get what you pay for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WTF? You for real?
fixxxer2008 said:
okay soo i started off loving my tbolt. i ran bamf ginger remix for months without issues. i then changed to aosp and while i prefer it, many bugs and bad battery life are keeping me away.
so i went back to bamf and while i feel at home, i get alot of lag no matter what kernel i use. i need some advice on what to do and what rom is the fastest/lag free with the best kernel combo.
im dying here guys.
as far as setcpu settings i usually use ondemand or interactive no higher than 1228/245.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Something is happening here, but you don't know what it is, do you, Mr. Jones?
Currently on CM7 nightly 199, wondering which kernel I should use.. Has anyone here tried both?
Have you read teh last 5-10 ish pages from each kernel? Theres your feedback. All the phones are a little different, you have to try them out and see how they work for your phone.
bmann_420 said:
Have you read teh last 5-10 ish pages from each kernel? Theres your feedback. All the phones are a little different, you have to try them out and see how they work for your phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really man? You make it sound like this guy is wrong for wanting a little feedback.
hesher said:
Currently on CM7 nightly 199, wondering which kernel I should use.. Has anyone here tried both?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tried both and on CM7 Nightly 199, I prefer morfic's Trinity kernel. For a while he didn't have the SOD patch like faux123 did, but now that he does I'm back on his kernel. I use the ELP kernel and I like his philosophy of "less is more".
Plus his kernels have CM7 CPU settings support, which I like since I prefer not to use 3rd party CPU apps, though I am currently enjoying Pimp My CPU a lot with all of its updates.
Thanks for the insight! I think I might flash Trinity. Is battery life better/the same as stock? I definetly dont wanna flash if its gonna be worse.
hesher said:
Thanks for the insight! I think I might flash Trinity. Is battery life better/the same as stock? I definetly dont wanna flash if its gonna be worse.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe both Trinity and faux123's kernel give better battery life, though I've never stayed with the CM7 kernel very long to know to what extent.
I have to agree with all the others. Both kernels tend to give slightly better performance with better battery life. I tend to lean more towards the Trinity kernel because the CPU adjustments can be modified through the CM settings.
I only say that for issues that crop up with people who post on that thread, and have not read this thread. I wasn't being mean or anything, you can get opinions here for sure, you can just view more detailed bugs or current issues on the thread itself. Maybe I was a little short, in wich I'm sorry... but I have tried both and my opinions will differ most likely in comparison to the way his phone will react to each kernel.
Wasn't trying to come off as an ass =) sorry if i did. that's just what I do to view day to day current updates/bugs.
But I can say I used to use trinity t11 that worked wonderfully, then I had issues and bugs on the new ones (t15 and betas) so now I'm on faux's ds version and I get a good battery life now.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Faux, voodoo sound keeps me from leaving.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
bmann_420 said:
Wasn't trying to come off as an ass =) sorry if i did. that's just what I do to view day to day current updates/bugs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're good man, no worries.
FatalityBoyZahy said:
Faux, voodoo sound keeps me from leaving.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's true, if you want voodoo sound, stick with faux123's kernel. If you look at morfic's thread though, it's probably coming back to his fairly soon thanks to supercurio.