Database Info

Overclocking the magician - fastest stable speed?

I've tried overclocking the cpu on my mini using pocket hackmaster. The fastest setting I've been able to use which was stable was:
CPU: 468(T), Bus: 117, Mem: 59, LCD: 59 (Mhz)
Has anyone else tried overclocking their magicians? What's the fastest speed you've been able to use?
On the other side of the coin, has anyone tried underclocking it? If so, any improvements to battery life with a slower cpu speed?

I think battery life would be improved on any pda when lowering cpu cycles. Make sure you have insurance on your phone too, I managed to kill one by overclocking.

Mine Mini is rock stable at 1073Mhz, 143, 36,72.

liusam said:
Mine Mini is rock stable at 1073Mhz, 143, 36,72.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure? Have U check w/ any benchmark program? 2 o/c program I know (Xcpu scaler, PHM) will report fake clock value at some point.

rocket said:
I've tried overclocking the cpu on my mini using pocket hackmaster. The fastest setting I've been able to use which was stable was:
CPU: 468(T), Bus: 117, Mem: 59, LCD: 59 (Mhz)
Has anyone else tried overclocking their magicians? What's the fastest speed you've been able to use?
On the other side of the coin, has anyone tried underclocking it? If so, any improvements to battery life with a slower cpu speed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
520MHz (
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
)
--> http://forum.xda-developers.com/viewtopic.php?t=24290

The Benchmark result fpor GXmark is 1352 when performed at 1073Mhz. :roll:

liusam said:
The Benchmark result fpor GXmark is 1352 when performed at 1073Mhz. :roll:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GXmark?

I personally found PHM to be a better overclocking program than XCPUScalar.
I added manually 618MHz (124,62,62,T) which gives an SI benchmark of 329, faster than all those over 900Mhz clock rates I got by PHM's automatic settings. Some of them might be fake but some of them just gives the same SI benchmark for the same bus speed no matter what the processor speed is.

I set my MDA Compact to 520Mhz, bus:130, mem:65, LSD: 65 with Pocket Hack Master 2005 v3.10.007! It runs stable and I think thet is pretty enough. :roll: 8) The battery life is shorter but still acceptable!
liusam said:
Mine Mini is rock stable at 1073Mhz, 143, 36,72.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
!!!! :roll: :shock: liusam! Can you tell us what program you used or how did you succeed this? Because this settings are very strange!!! It's very "interesting" for me what this multiplayer is? :lol: I think a multiplayer like this: 7,5034965034965034965034965034965 is a quiet impossible! In my opinion the max. multiplayer is FSBx4!

I set my o2 mini to CPU: 620(T), Bus: 124, Mem: 61, LCD: 61 (Mhz) , It was running pretty good but sometime , somehow it slow down for a few sec . But anyway i think the good Speed is CPU: 512(T), Bus: 130, Mem: 65, LCD: 65 (Mhz) with this setting i can see it not fast as the 620 but more stable . Anyway i just get back to the normal speed because i did too many test and it freezing my o2 now , IF i see anything interesting i will tell you guy

HI
where can i get the software to overclock my Jam and also the benchmarking software ??
regards
reo

Are you guys gettings speeds higher than normal with or without the power lead attached? XCPUScalar says you only get 520mhz with power lead in (which it did, although it hard reset when I disconnected the power cable )
I wouldn't mind trying other overclocking software if they're more successful, 520mhz is lovely to use, so smooth.
What stable speed can you guys get without the power lead in, and with what settings?
V

S100 Stabel at CPU: 702, Bus: 117, Mem: 59, LCD: 59 (Mhz)
I run whit 6 scale config. from 208Mhz to 702Mhz

In Pocket Hack Master try "fast bus=on" and your bus speed increase without problems. For example, now I have 208 mhz bus:
CPU=520 BUS=208 RAM=52 LCD=104
I use following settings:
L=16 N=5 A=0 LCD_26=0 Turbo=on Halfturbo=off Fast Bus=on
if N=6 then CPU=624 - no problem for my S110

@truedim
It doesn't work for me with N=6.
But it works with
L=18 -> 585 MHZ, SI=367 [234:59:59:T].
Any higher speed resets my device. I believe it depends on components tolerance. Btw, your 520Mhz settings raised my SI from 313 (std 520) to 322.
Silver

how to set fast bus or choose L=18 -> 585 MHZ ? i can set only 1 stable frequency which is 520/133 can u tell me how to set higher one ?
ok i solved the problem : ) i just need to add manual speed :F

520:260:65:65 gives me a SI of 373. It's stable as well.

The Benchmark result fpor GXmark is 1352 when performed at 1073Mhz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ur Jam is running at 1073mhz? U must b joking dude. It will fried up ur proccesor b4 u even reaches 1000mhz

I am running 1073 too,and you should also check it

I suggest anyone who claimed they get a 700mzh+ clock magician do a testing w/ TCMP Player. Take a look at what clock speed it detected and a "REAL" benchmark testing w/ Video/auido.

Spica Quadrant Benchmark Score

This is my benchmark score
Running on CyanogenMod-6.1.1-Spica-alpha8.2 ch33ky kernel with Intercept 3d and youtube HQ patch.
cache,data,system on ext2
post yours(firmware version or any modification with the firmware. Let's help each other on making our spica's faster and better).

I can't take a picture,but I have 442
With CyanogenMod 6.1.1-Spica-alpha8.2 Intercept 3d driver and sound driver from nexus S

ZeRo_samdroid said:
I can't take a picture,but I have 442
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for the reply try this CyanogenMod-6.1.1-Spica-alpha8.2 ch33ky kernel with Intercept 3d and youtube HQ patch. It's faster and stable.

ZeRo_samdroid said:
I can't take a picture,but I have 442
With CyanogenMod 6.1.1-Spica-alpha8.2 Intercept 3d driver and sound driver from nexus S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
where did u get this 3d & Sound driver, give me the link plz.......

Dricos said:
where did u get this 3d & Sound driver, give me the link plz.......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
forum.samdroid.net/f53/intercept-3d-drivers-cyanogemod-3601/#post90776 & forum.samdroid.net/f56/new-audio-driver-spica-porting-nexus-s-gingerbread-3615/ drivers

I have noticed that the Quadrant scores are not really that good of an indication of the phones actual performance.
For example:
If you put your OS on your SD card, you will get AMAZING Quadrant scores, but your phone will be laggy as hell.
Other then the normal score with the better responsiveness.
I am currently running CM6.1.1-alpha8.2 with the patches for video and 3D
Before the patches I used to have a score of around 700 with an ok responsiveness from the system.
After i applied the patches, the interface became WAY more responsive, and the entire spica experience became way smoother and faster.
This cant be seen in the quadrant scores, because now its giving me around 500-600.
Summary: Quadrant scores.. meh, it a nice indication, nothing more.

bayones said:
This is my benchmark score
Running on CyanogenMod-6.1.1-Spica-alpha8.2 ch33ky kernel with Intercept 3d and youtube HQ patch.
cache,data,system on ext2
...
post yours(firmware version or any modification with the firmware. Let's help each other on making our spica's faster and better).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Little OT but might help some folks; I see you have everything on ext2. Have you tried rebooting yet? My spica didn't survive reboots (won't boot past samdroid splashscreen) without going through recovery and wiping the cache. This was solved by leaving data as rfs.
Running same rom, kernel, and patches as OP. No other mods. No quadrant scores yet.
System/Cache: ext2
Data: rfs
Sent from my GT-I5700 using XDA App

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Nevermind my previous post. Seems that both ext2 and rfs is ok and ext4 is the culprit. I have everything on ext2 now.
Linpack: 9.018 mflops @ 9.3 sec.
Quadrant SE: 699
Sent from my GT-I5700 using XDA App

Quadrant Score: 616(CPU-1212,Mem-287,I/O-1177,2D-279,3D-125)
Linpack Score: 10,238 MFLOPS

bayones said:
This is my benchmark score
Running on CyanogenMod-6.1.1-Spica-alpha8.2 ch33ky kernel with Intercept 3d and youtube HQ patch.
cache,data,system on ext2
post yours(firmware version or any modification with the firmware. Let's help each other on making our spica's faster and better).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
which ch33ky kernel are you using...ch33ky has the kernel posted for alpha8.3 but nothing for alpha 8.2 i have everything like you but no cheeky kernel...also if one needs to move to 8.3 im fed up of deleting stuff and reinstalling is there a way for backing stuff up for the move to 8.3? from what I can see 8.2 still has more working parts then 8.3!

deltree said:
which ch33ky kernel are you using...ch33ky has the kernel posted for alpha8.3 but nothing for alpha 8.2 i have everything like you but no cheeky kernel...also if one needs to move to 8.3 im fed up of deleting stuff and reinstalling is there a way for backing stuff up for the move to 8.3? from what I can see 8.2 still has more working parts then 8.3!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM 8.2 should use kernel 010. CM 8.3 use kernel 011 and sssMOD 06c.

Quadrant Score: 670-730 (yonip v.10a)

I get around 700 - 750 Quadrants (CPU and I/O around 1400 - 1600), CM A8.3.2 on Yonip 17a (2.6.32.9), fast, responsive, stable, albeit with a problematic 3G bug, but great overall user experience!

(App comparative) Benchmarck Comparator

Dear All,
A lot of people here are trying to compare their phones, their performance using benchmarks. Or, each benchmark tool has it own set of test and of instructions, take advantage of the multi-core capabilities, or not...
Also I wanted to have a tools to compare versions of the same rom in terms of performance evolution.
For this reasons, I started a page on my site, the principle is as follow:
Clean installation of the device and full wipe.
No custom kernel if not already installed in the ROM
Installation of the following Benchmark tools:
Antutu:It can run a full test of a key project, through the "Memory Performance","CPU Integer Performance","CPU Floating point Performance","2D 3D Graphics Performance","SD card reading/writing speed","Database IO" performance testing on the mobile phone Performance of the hardware to make score.​
CF-Bench:CF-Bench is (mainly) CPU and memory benchmark tool specifically designed to be able to handle multi-core devices, produce a fairly stable score, and test both native as well managed code performance.​
Linpack:The LINPACK Benchmarks are a measure of a system’s floating point computing power. Introduced by Jack Dongarra, they measure how fast a computer solves a dense N by N system of linear equations Ax = b, which is a common task in engineering. The solution is obtained by Gaussian elimination with partial pivoting, with 2/3*N3 + 2*N2 floating point operations. The result is reported in Millions of FLoating-point Operations Per Second (MFLOP/s, sometimes simply called FLOPS).​
Quadrant:Quadrant is a CPU, I/O and 3D graphics benchmark. The Standard Edition requires an Internet connection to compute benchmark results and is supported by ads.​
Vellamo:Vellamo is a mobile Web benchmark that evaluates browser performance on Android devices. Vellamo provides a holistic view into browser performance and stability, including networking, JavaScript, rendering, and user experience.​
Reboot of the machine
15 seconds of wait time for the machine to boot and launch of the bench
Reboot between each benchmark
Of course I will try to include as many roms and versions as possible but for that I will need your help. I still need to think of a detail protocol to submit the result and make sure the benchmarks are run for all in the exact same way (no overclocking and all. I also in the short terms would like to introduce a bench to stress test the battery and have a comparison here too.
Any suggestion is of course more that welcome and the page can be found here:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Test protocol
Test protocol
On the rom you currently have in your device, download:
AnTuTu Benchmark: https://market.android.com/details?id=com.antutu.ABenchMark
CF-Bench: https://market.android.com/details?id=eu.chainfire.cfbench
Linpack: https://market.android.com/details?id=com.greenecomputing.linpack
Quadrant Standard Edition: https://market.android.com/details?id=com.aurorasoftworks.quadrant.ui.standard
Vellamo Mobile Web Benchmark: https://market.android.com/details?id=com.quicinc.vellamo
Battery Benchmark: https://market.android.com/details?id=com.batterybench
All those benchmark tools are FREE
Once those installed, I used Titanium or myBackup pro to extract the APKs and move them to a folder on my desktop.
Once this is done
Install the rom you want to benchmark
Full wipe (data and cache)!!!
Once the rom booted, no account must been set
No gmail, no mail, no twitter, no facebook....
This is to avoid any kind of background loading that could perturb the bench
MAKE SURE YOU HAVE a WIFI INTERNET CONNECTION SET UP somme bench need it
install all the benchmark tools using abd, here is what my install scrept look like:
adb.exe install -r "./Bench APK/antutu_v2.4.apk"
adb.exe install -r "./Bench APK/cf-bench_v1.1.apk"
adb.exe install -r "./Bench APK/linpack_v1.2.8.apk"
adb.exe install -r "./Bench APK/quadrant_v1.1.7.apk"
adb.exe install -r "./Bench APK/Vellamo_v1.0.4.apk"
adb.exe install -r "./Bench APK/batterybench_v2.6"
adb.exe reboot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unplug the phone from your computer and plug it to the power supply
Once the phone restarted, wait 20 seconds to have the phone completely loaded and all processes launched
Start the bench
Write the results
Reboot the phone
back to step 07 until all benchmarks are done*
For Linpack: the Single thread bench will be launched just before the multi-thread one WITHOUT REBOUT in betweend
For Battery Benchmark:
the battery must be fully charged before starting the test
the 5% Bench will be the one chosen in order to be "fast" (the most inaccurate but gives an idea and a base to compare)
For the results, the should be presented as follow:
Device
Brand: ex. HTC
Name: ex. Desire Z
Rom
Name: ex. MIUI OsiMood
Cook: ex. CarpeNoctem
Link: ex. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=958475
Version: ex. 1.10.21
Min CPU speed Frequency (can be read in Antutu Info tab): ex. 216.5
Max CPU speed Frequency (can be read in Antutu Info tab): ex. 1003.5
Android version (can be read in Antutu Info tab): ex. 2.3.7
Antutu
version: ex. 2.4
RAM: ex. 305
CPU Integer: ex. 631
CPU Float-point: ex. 275
2D Graphics: ex. 287
3D Graphics: ex: 659
Database IO: ex: 265
SD Card Write: ex. 48
SD Card Read: ex. 170
Total Score: ex. 2999
CF-Bench
version: ex. 1.1
Native Score 4401
Java Score 1641
Overall Score 2745
Linpack
version: 1.2.8
ST - MFLOPS: 41.543
ST- Time (in second) 2.02
ST - Norm Res 5.68
MT - MFLOPS 36.563
MT- Time (in second) 4.61
MT - Norm Res 3.24
Quadrant
version 1.1.7
Sccore 2301
Vellamo
version 1.0.3
Score 785
Battery Benchmark
version: 2.6
Elapsed Time: 1374
Test completed - N° of loop: 252
Test completed - N° of GET: 125

One more to be edited soon

thanks for this now i have a way to tell if my phone is fast and efficient

For the battery Benchmark, I've come through this one that seems to be the most systematic in terms of protocols: https://market.android.com/details?id=com.batterybench
Does anybody have experience to share about it?
Also how many people out there would be willing to help me to populate the database ?

nice info ...thanx!

Sure, no problem.
If you are willing to help to populate the database, please let me know:
the device you are using
the rom
its version
and if you are willing to send me an update on every revision
The best is if you are the cook of the rom.
Thanks

Nobody's interested ?

[App] M3D Benchmark [ (UPDATED) last version: v2.00b]

(M3D Benchmark)
Hello
I want to show you a new Benchmark app which you can almost understand how much is your android device power to handle 3d games and apps.
This Benchmark is created with Unity 3d game engine (game engine of Shadowgun) and it is based on OpenGL ES 2.0 with This API (OpenGL ES 2.0) your device can handle Advanced rendering techniques like rendering bump maps.The Cost of M3D Benchmark is 0.00$ or in other words it's Free.
Maybe you want to say this benchmark is heavy ! it might be true ! but you should know in this benchmark there are lots of trees and flowers Also there are particle systems such as rain, and there are bump maps and etc.
Most contents of this benchmark is from unity3d BootCamp Demo in another word it’s almost a MOD.
Now I want from you to help me to create it better and I want from you submit your result (AVERAGE FPS) via posting your replies (please write your device model, your Rom version also it is better you upload a screenshot from your result).
M3D Benchmark is Developed by knight93.
Some notes:
1-last version of M3D Benchmark is v2.00b(http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1370745&page=23 (Post 228))
2-You need Froyo 2.0.1 and an OpenGL ES 2.0 supported device at minimum.
3-Because of M3D Benchmark (from v1.10 to v1.20) apk file size (About 28MB) installation may take up to 2 minutes.
4-If you can’t install the App please check up install from unknown sources permission.
5-Screen shot of splash image is simulated in pc.
6-it's better you don't allow to your device became lock (for example tap your screen)also you can increase your device display time out instead of touching display.
7-v1.00 is deleted because of it's problem,(v1.20 is available:http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=21613547&postcount=171) , version 1.10 isn't final version and performance is really finalized.
Thank you
I wait for your comments.
please write the version of m3d benchmark which you have tested.
Some screenshots(v1.00):
Download link (v2.00b):
Generic Version: http://filesave.me/file/16131/m3bv2-00b-apk.html
Download links (v1.20):
Generic version: http://filesave.me/file/13279/M3D-Benchmark-v1-20-L-R-V---apk.html
Download links (v1.15):
Generic version: http://filesave.me/file/12968/M3D-Benchmark-v1-15-Generic--apk.html
Tegra2 version: http://filesave.me/file/12969/M3D-Benchmark-v1-15-Tegra2--apk.html
PowerVR version: http://filesave.me/file/12970/M3D-Benchmark-v1-15-PowerVR--apk.html
Adreno version: http://filesave.me/file/12971/M3D-Benchmark-v1-15-Snapdragon--apk.html
Download links (v1.10):
http://filesave.me/file/12669/M3D-Benchmark-v1-10--apk.html
dear users please donate us , if you donate us you will take some advantages like you will receive our products sooner than other users and for future product you will get discount of product cost or in other word you became our premium user.
if you want donate us please email: [email protected]
one of the important creator of this benchmark is Seyedsadegh Yousefzadeh.

First downloading now
Sent from my MB855 using xda premium

hello
if download link or any problem do you have tell me.
it's better you don't allow to your device became lock (for example tap your screen).
i wait for your replies !
thank you !

Samsung Galaxy S II i9100
Running KK5 stock (Gingerbread 2.3.6)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I like it. The environment reminds me of S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

hello
Thank you rayleterleir
I want from you submit your result (AVERAGE FPS) via posting your replies (please write your device model, your Rom version also it is better you upload a screenshot from your result).
i wait for your replies !
thank you !

Downloading now. Will post results once it's up and running.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Current Toys:
S-offed CM7ed TmoUS Sensation 4G
Rooted Asus TF101 Tab on Revolver
Past:
Nexus S – Rooted & ROMed
HD2 – All Modded, My Android addiction began
Iphone 3G – JB, Unlocked on TmoUS
Blackjack – Themed Win6.5
Nokia 7610
HTC TyTN

8.18.....
Htc sensation OC to 1,78ghz
running Miui 1.11.25
so is this app working correctly?

average : 25.37
current : 32.55
on galaxy s2, miui 1.11.25

stroobach said:
8.18.....
Htc sensation OC to 1,78ghz
running Miui 1.11.25
so is this app working correctly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Working or not? same question.
I got
AVG FPS 7.37
OC to 1.78GHz
running Sensation CM7 SelfKang Alphafied Number 10

Hi,
HTC Desire HD -1.1Ghz - RCMix3D Runny 4.0

hello
thank you for your replies
i should make it more optimize,for example i should make grasses and flowers textures more optimize,but i need time to do this.
if you give me more result it's became better for example you can understand how is difference of your device average fps compare to v1.00
thank you again !

HTC EVO 3D, I used two different speeds: 384MHZ - 1.2GHZ & 384-1.5GHZ. Both came out around here.
Average: ~8.5XXXXFPS
Current: ~11.XXXXFPS
I really like the benchmark so far, even if it is 30MB ^_^

Phone: Galaxy s2
Rom: Oxygen 2.3.2
Kernel :Siyah 2.3
Setcpu:Ondemand 120
Average FPS: 26.92
Regards, and I agree with the previous comment, reminds me of S.T.A.L.K.E.R on the P.C

great aplication.....

Glacier(mytouch4g)
Oc to 1.7 on demonspeed v12
Miui 1.11.25

Someone multiupload? Please!
Sent from HydrOG3N MOD S2.
Technology Evolves, Android Evolves.
HydrOG3N is THE Revolution.

Downloading now

hello
do have any problem with: http://filesave.me/file/12429/3DM-Benchmark-apk.html ?
i will upload the benchmark to another host in next 7 hours (about 7 hours)
thank you

Yeah, can't download from phone.
Multiupload please.
Sent from HydrOG3N MOD S2.
Technology Evolves, Android Evolves.
HydrOG3N is THE Revolution.

Paradoxxx said:
Yeah, can't download from phone.
Multiupload please.
Sent from HydrOG3N MOD S2.
Technology Evolves, Android Evolves.
HydrOG3N is THE Revolution.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use opera..

[Kernel] ardatdat kernel v1.6b3 [CWM] (2012-04-06)

Dear all,
As I have already distributed the v1.6b1 (beta 1) to some (many?) of members a week ago. I have been requested to open a new thread such that I could highlight what have been changed and let all testers to express their feelings and opinions to the new kernel in this centralized thread.
First, let me introduce the features of "The New Kernel" ... (not The New iPad)...
1. Stabilized the voltage & frequency setting such that the 'stock' voltage is used without affecting OC stability.
2. As different machine's CPUs are different, OC to 1.35Ghz is not the most stable setting. Instead, 1.3Ghz will be the max.
3. Remove some of the useless codes used in v1.5
4. Pick some of the code difference from the official XWLA4 kernel
5. Add in support to read NTFS & CIFS file system
6. Switch to use the SLUB allocator
7. Disable ipv6 (unless I am told to add it back)
8. Other minor bug fixes
Next, let me conclude some of the comments from members on the beta:
1. Works fine with Titanium ROM 2.1
2. Undervolted it to 750mv @ 608mhz, more stable than v1.5
3. More smooth than v1.5
4. Not as warm as v1.5, so far so 'cool' in temperature
5. No lag, no freeze
So, welcome for more opinions, discussions and findings and let's discuss here. If everything goes right, I will release v1.6 within a few days
** Updated: v1.6b2 has been sent out to around 10 testers for testing

-- reserved --

just got back from long leave...
got your kernel but havent installed it yet..
on your last 1.5 i'm having problem with ONDEMAND mode. it does not smooth after long standby/idle. INTERACTIVE is the best setting for me. hope 1.6 is much2 better!..
gonna test it tonight woohooo!!..

My sister's Galaxy R is using the really old ODIN version .
Can I directly upgrade like this ?
Herpderp Defy.

EmoBoiix3 said:
My sister's Galaxy R is using the really old ODIN version .
Can I directly upgrade like this ?
Herpderp Defy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it should be fine.
Flashing the kernel every time is flashing a 'new' one. There are not any dependency with the previous kernel.

4 days of intensive testing and I've found no probs. Can someone put his undervolting stable results?
Enviado desde mi GT-I9103 usando Tapatalk

help..............
first i used 1200 frequency on interactive profile on 1.5, i have no lags but just test 1.6 the same frequency i find some lags in adw transition and also battery is drain out very fast............................

Still I would love to see support for 2WCR

amar1548 said:
first i used 1200 frequency on interactive profile on 1.5, i have no lags but just test 1.6 the same frequency i find some lags in adw transition and also battery is drain out very fast............................
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your report.
As I think you are the only one experiencing that. Could you please elaborate more on the situation. Example: the SetCPU setting / profile setting / screenshot. Lag, how lag, and have you wipe the cache before flashing the new kernel? Have you tried to flash back v1.5 and see the situation. Also, battery drain is fast is strange as I use 'lower' voltage setting that v1.5.
Please help to test more and provide more information such that we could help in fixing the problem. Thanks.

ardatdat said:
Thanks for your report.
As I think you are the only one experiencing that. Could you please elaborate more on the situation. Example: the SetCPU setting / profile setting / screenshot. Lag, how lag, and have you wipe the cache before flashing the new kernel? Have you tried to flash back v1.5 and see the situation. Also, battery drain is fast is strange as I use 'lower' voltage setting that v1.5.
Please help to test more and provide more information such that we could help in fixing the problem. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
when firstly i installed this i didn't format cache then restore to 1.5 but see ur instruction i format cache and again flash 1.6 since 2 hours flashing it runs quite smoothly now ....... in set cpu i have used 1200 mhz frequency and interactive profile but i doesn't change any voltage.......... please insist me if i have to change voltage either or frequency........

I tested frequency 1100 mhz and I must admit it's unbelievable how much boost i performance gives you clocking with just 100 mhz. I would say it's relatively the most efficient frequency. (if you compare differences between 1 and 1,1 ghz, and then 1,1 and 1,2 ghz).

Where can I find 1,6 version
Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk

u can't, it's still being tested, but if you want to participate send pm directly to ardatdat.

NTFS Support
Got my OTG cable today,
Plugged in my NTFS formatted Pen drive and its loaded with all gears.
Thanks ardatdat for bringing up NTFS support on my request.

m.kochan10 said:
I tested frequency 1100 mhz and I must admit it's unbelievable how much boost i performance gives you clocking with just 100 mhz. I would say it's relatively the most efficient frequency. (if you compare differences between 1 and 1,1 ghz, and then 1,1 and 1,2 ghz).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm still on stock kernel, but will most likely update to ardatdat's 1.6 when released.
Is the performance boost perceived boost under general usage or is it synthetic benchmarks such as Antutu?

It was so funny. If v1.6 is not released, maybe you could all blame him for it.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Woah . What a spammer .
Herpderp Defy.

Why spamer? Huge and devoted fan of good piece of software
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium

m.kochan10 said:
Why spamer? Huge and devoted fan of good piece of software
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Devoted..? "Fanatic" XD

That was supposed to be sarcastic