Dear all,
As I have already distributed the v1.6b1 (beta 1) to some (many?) of members a week ago. I have been requested to open a new thread such that I could highlight what have been changed and let all testers to express their feelings and opinions to the new kernel in this centralized thread.
First, let me introduce the features of "The New Kernel" ... (not The New iPad)...
1. Stabilized the voltage & frequency setting such that the 'stock' voltage is used without affecting OC stability.
2. As different machine's CPUs are different, OC to 1.35Ghz is not the most stable setting. Instead, 1.3Ghz will be the max.
3. Remove some of the useless codes used in v1.5
4. Pick some of the code difference from the official XWLA4 kernel
5. Add in support to read NTFS & CIFS file system
6. Switch to use the SLUB allocator
7. Disable ipv6 (unless I am told to add it back)
8. Other minor bug fixes
Next, let me conclude some of the comments from members on the beta:
1. Works fine with Titanium ROM 2.1
2. Undervolted it to 750mv @ 608mhz, more stable than v1.5
3. More smooth than v1.5
4. Not as warm as v1.5, so far so 'cool' in temperature
5. No lag, no freeze
So, welcome for more opinions, discussions and findings and let's discuss here. If everything goes right, I will release v1.6 within a few days
** Updated: v1.6b2 has been sent out to around 10 testers for testing
-- reserved --
just got back from long leave...
got your kernel but havent installed it yet..
on your last 1.5 i'm having problem with ONDEMAND mode. it does not smooth after long standby/idle. INTERACTIVE is the best setting for me. hope 1.6 is much2 better!..
gonna test it tonight woohooo!!..
My sister's Galaxy R is using the really old ODIN version .
Can I directly upgrade like this ?
Herpderp Defy.
EmoBoiix3 said:
My sister's Galaxy R is using the really old ODIN version .
Can I directly upgrade like this ?
Herpderp Defy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it should be fine.
Flashing the kernel every time is flashing a 'new' one. There are not any dependency with the previous kernel.
4 days of intensive testing and I've found no probs. Can someone put his undervolting stable results?
Enviado desde mi GT-I9103 usando Tapatalk
help..............
first i used 1200 frequency on interactive profile on 1.5, i have no lags but just test 1.6 the same frequency i find some lags in adw transition and also battery is drain out very fast............................
Still I would love to see support for 2WCR
amar1548 said:
first i used 1200 frequency on interactive profile on 1.5, i have no lags but just test 1.6 the same frequency i find some lags in adw transition and also battery is drain out very fast............................
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your report.
As I think you are the only one experiencing that. Could you please elaborate more on the situation. Example: the SetCPU setting / profile setting / screenshot. Lag, how lag, and have you wipe the cache before flashing the new kernel? Have you tried to flash back v1.5 and see the situation. Also, battery drain is fast is strange as I use 'lower' voltage setting that v1.5.
Please help to test more and provide more information such that we could help in fixing the problem. Thanks.
ardatdat said:
Thanks for your report.
As I think you are the only one experiencing that. Could you please elaborate more on the situation. Example: the SetCPU setting / profile setting / screenshot. Lag, how lag, and have you wipe the cache before flashing the new kernel? Have you tried to flash back v1.5 and see the situation. Also, battery drain is fast is strange as I use 'lower' voltage setting that v1.5.
Please help to test more and provide more information such that we could help in fixing the problem. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
when firstly i installed this i didn't format cache then restore to 1.5 but see ur instruction i format cache and again flash 1.6 since 2 hours flashing it runs quite smoothly now ....... in set cpu i have used 1200 mhz frequency and interactive profile but i doesn't change any voltage.......... please insist me if i have to change voltage either or frequency........
I tested frequency 1100 mhz and I must admit it's unbelievable how much boost i performance gives you clocking with just 100 mhz. I would say it's relatively the most efficient frequency. (if you compare differences between 1 and 1,1 ghz, and then 1,1 and 1,2 ghz).
Where can I find 1,6 version
Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk
u can't, it's still being tested, but if you want to participate send pm directly to ardatdat.
NTFS Support
Got my OTG cable today,
Plugged in my NTFS formatted Pen drive and its loaded with all gears.
Thanks ardatdat for bringing up NTFS support on my request.
m.kochan10 said:
I tested frequency 1100 mhz and I must admit it's unbelievable how much boost i performance gives you clocking with just 100 mhz. I would say it's relatively the most efficient frequency. (if you compare differences between 1 and 1,1 ghz, and then 1,1 and 1,2 ghz).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm still on stock kernel, but will most likely update to ardatdat's 1.6 when released.
Is the performance boost perceived boost under general usage or is it synthetic benchmarks such as Antutu?
It was so funny. If v1.6 is not released, maybe you could all blame him for it.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Woah . What a spammer .
Herpderp Defy.
Why spamer? Huge and devoted fan of good piece of software
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
m.kochan10 said:
Why spamer? Huge and devoted fan of good piece of software
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Devoted..? "Fanatic" XD
That was supposed to be sarcastic
Related
This is my benchmark score
Running on CyanogenMod-6.1.1-Spica-alpha8.2 ch33ky kernel with Intercept 3d and youtube HQ patch.
cache,data,system on ext2
post yours(firmware version or any modification with the firmware. Let's help each other on making our spica's faster and better).
I can't take a picture,but I have 442
With CyanogenMod 6.1.1-Spica-alpha8.2 Intercept 3d driver and sound driver from nexus S
ZeRo_samdroid said:
I can't take a picture,but I have 442
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for the reply try this CyanogenMod-6.1.1-Spica-alpha8.2 ch33ky kernel with Intercept 3d and youtube HQ patch. It's faster and stable.
ZeRo_samdroid said:
I can't take a picture,but I have 442
With CyanogenMod 6.1.1-Spica-alpha8.2 Intercept 3d driver and sound driver from nexus S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
where did u get this 3d & Sound driver, give me the link plz.......
Dricos said:
where did u get this 3d & Sound driver, give me the link plz.......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
forum.samdroid.net/f53/intercept-3d-drivers-cyanogemod-3601/#post90776 & forum.samdroid.net/f56/new-audio-driver-spica-porting-nexus-s-gingerbread-3615/ drivers
I have noticed that the Quadrant scores are not really that good of an indication of the phones actual performance.
For example:
If you put your OS on your SD card, you will get AMAZING Quadrant scores, but your phone will be laggy as hell.
Other then the normal score with the better responsiveness.
I am currently running CM6.1.1-alpha8.2 with the patches for video and 3D
Before the patches I used to have a score of around 700 with an ok responsiveness from the system.
After i applied the patches, the interface became WAY more responsive, and the entire spica experience became way smoother and faster.
This cant be seen in the quadrant scores, because now its giving me around 500-600.
Summary: Quadrant scores.. meh, it a nice indication, nothing more.
bayones said:
This is my benchmark score
Running on CyanogenMod-6.1.1-Spica-alpha8.2 ch33ky kernel with Intercept 3d and youtube HQ patch.
cache,data,system on ext2
...
post yours(firmware version or any modification with the firmware. Let's help each other on making our spica's faster and better).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Little OT but might help some folks; I see you have everything on ext2. Have you tried rebooting yet? My spica didn't survive reboots (won't boot past samdroid splashscreen) without going through recovery and wiping the cache. This was solved by leaving data as rfs.
Running same rom, kernel, and patches as OP. No other mods. No quadrant scores yet.
System/Cache: ext2
Data: rfs
Sent from my GT-I5700 using XDA App
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Nevermind my previous post. Seems that both ext2 and rfs is ok and ext4 is the culprit. I have everything on ext2 now.
Linpack: 9.018 mflops @ 9.3 sec.
Quadrant SE: 699
Sent from my GT-I5700 using XDA App
Quadrant Score: 616(CPU-1212,Mem-287,I/O-1177,2D-279,3D-125)
Linpack Score: 10,238 MFLOPS
bayones said:
This is my benchmark score
Running on CyanogenMod-6.1.1-Spica-alpha8.2 ch33ky kernel with Intercept 3d and youtube HQ patch.
cache,data,system on ext2
post yours(firmware version or any modification with the firmware. Let's help each other on making our spica's faster and better).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
which ch33ky kernel are you using...ch33ky has the kernel posted for alpha8.3 but nothing for alpha 8.2 i have everything like you but no cheeky kernel...also if one needs to move to 8.3 im fed up of deleting stuff and reinstalling is there a way for backing stuff up for the move to 8.3? from what I can see 8.2 still has more working parts then 8.3!
deltree said:
which ch33ky kernel are you using...ch33ky has the kernel posted for alpha8.3 but nothing for alpha 8.2 i have everything like you but no cheeky kernel...also if one needs to move to 8.3 im fed up of deleting stuff and reinstalling is there a way for backing stuff up for the move to 8.3? from what I can see 8.2 still has more working parts then 8.3!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM 8.2 should use kernel 010. CM 8.3 use kernel 011 and sssMOD 06c.
Quadrant Score: 670-730 (yonip v.10a)
I get around 700 - 750 Quadrants (CPU and I/O around 1400 - 1600), CM A8.3.2 on Yonip 17a (2.6.32.9), fast, responsive, stable, albeit with a problematic 3G bug, but great overall user experience!
I've download SETCPU and for some reason, I don't see the phone listed.
NVIDIA tegra 2 TP20/AP2OH?
t-mobile Pulse?
Cannot find it. Anyone know what to do in this situation?
Use Pimp My CPU instead.
I believe that Pimp my CPU is the only one working for our phone. You may want to check that out instead. If you search on XDA the Developer posted the app on here, however, I suggest you purchase the app from the market to support him.
Depends..
If your on stock rom and kernel then use setcpu and choose tegra2.
If your on custom rom with custom OC kernel use pimp my cpu.
Of course both require your phone to be rooted as well.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App
What exactly does SetCPU do that the stock froyo governor does not do?
Just curious.
This week I am trying a couple of things to see how big a difference Juice Defender and SetCPU really make.
^ Honestly haven't seen a difference with Juicedefender, unless I need to download the ultimate one. The basic one actually drains mybattery like no tomorrow.
Honestly, I use task killer but manual, I hardly kill my applications, I ignore most of them that need to be on or are on everytime I turn my phone.
But I have a girlfriend that likes to play 6 - 10 games at a time when she's on my phone, that needs to be killed when she's done or when I'm done with them.
I'm going to try SETCPU for tegra2 because I'm on stock right now. Looking to download a ROM though
What SETCPU does is it scales the processor frequency or speed in non techy terms.
For example:
If you enable screen off profile you can force the processor to run on slower speeds to conserve battery when the screen is off.
Recommended settings:
Max: 500
Min: lowest
Also with battery profile enabled if the phone goes below certain percentage it will drop the processor's speed to help conserve battery life as well but of course sacrificing performance though.
Recommended settings:
Max: lowest
Min: lowest
The main screen a.k.a general profile is the main profile the processor will be set to when the screen is on and the phone is being used.
Recommended settings:
Max: 1ghz
Min: 1ghz
What do you suggest for the other profiles such as charging or temp? Thanks for your post. It's the only one I've found in this thread with suggestions for the noobs.
mylomine said:
What do you suggest for the other profiles such as charging or temp? Thanks for your post. It's the only one I've found in this thread with suggestions for the noobs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have one for charging, but for temp, I have the max speed kick down to about half (512MHz or whatever the step value is) if the temp goes over 41C.
The most important one is the Screen Off profile, I have the max speed set to one step over minimum and it saves a lot of battery life.
sryan1983 said:
I believe that Pimp my CPU is the only one working for our phone. You may want to check that out instead. If you search on XDA the Developer posted the app on here, however, I suggest you purchase the app from the market to support him.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I beg to differ....cause I use setcpu.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App
Setcpu has worked for me on stock Froyo and stock Gingerbread, both rooted ofcourse.
Faux's kernel needs pimp, but morfic's Trinity kernel uses SetCPU and works great.
Sent from my Nexus 3 using XDA Ultimate App
LordButtersI said:
Faux's kernel needs pimp, but morfic's Trinity kernel uses SetCPU and works great.
Sent from my Nexus 3 using XDA Ultimate App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've used SetCPU with Faux's kernel ever since the dev made SetCPU usable with Tegra devices.
In fact here is a post with Faux saying to use either http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=16056765&postcount=1695
ALL CREDITS TO ::::::: tegrak :::::::
**SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE** NOW SUPPORTED
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
You can set the CPU cores as dynamic hotplug mode, single core mode or fully dual core mode.
This provides easy and simple way to use.
[ Features ]
*Set on boot
Change mode what you selected automatically on boot time.
Menu > Settings
[ Modes ]
*Dynamic Hotplug Mode
Default. Recently, mobile multicore CPUs turn off extra core(s) to save battery life when system is not busy and only use 1 core.
They turn on extra core(s) when system is busy. so system use all cores again.
*Single Core Mode
Use 1 core always. A extra core is shut down. It makes battery life longer but performance is decreased. [ Battery saving, Idle mode, Phone not in use ]
*Dual Core Mode
Use 2 cores always. Performance is increased but battery life is shorter than others. [Example : Zip or Rar Extraction, Photo Editing App Fast Load ]
*Available kernels
- FM Kernel 1.5
- Abyss Kernel 3.1
- Tegrak Kernel Build 31 [ XXKL7]
- Tegrak Kernel Build 31 [XXKL8]
Download ::
Android Market
See more details.
http://tegrak2x.blogspot.com/2011/11/2nd-core.html
**** Kernel Developers ****
If you add support for tegrak's 2nd core, please update or post here so that i can update the kernel support.
Also please let me know here, if the app has helped you in any way, did it make your phone fly away or ... ???
tids2k said:
Also please let me know here, if the app has helped you in any way, did it make your phone fly away or ... ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Note is flying anyway...
So, i have seen this application and i have a question...What's the meaning of this??I mean...The only reason i can find it usefull is the one core mode that it can battery.But why someone to enable 2 cores all the time??The cores is auto enable when something ''heavy'' running in our device.Why to enable it when otherwise?
If i am wrong please light me up...
Anyway, thank u @tids2k for sharing.You are our researcher...
eliashadow said:
My Note is flying anyway...
So, i have seen this application and i have a question...What's the meaning of this??I mean...The only reason i can find it usefull is the one core mode that it can battery.But why someone to enable 2 cores all the time??The cores is auto enable when something ''heavy'' running in our device.Why to enable it when otherwise?
If i am wrong please light me up...
Anyway, thank u @tids2k for sharing.You are our researcher...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benchmark testing, mostly, though it also adds a little "pop" to application launching and UI performance in some situations.
Examples updated
User Comment on Android Market:
And theoretically 2 cores are more efficient than 1 due to both running at a lower clocked speed than it would with 1 core.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At first I was thinking "right whatever mate" - but then I started thinking ... maybe bad idea?
Are there scenarios where this might be true? I'm not sure of by what order of magnitude power consumption goes up by when increasing clocks but I seem to recall my WinMo phone Xscales had an expoential increase - specifically doubling the speed of the processor quadrupled the power consumption. This could be complete garbage btw, it was a long time ago and everything, and have no bearing at all on ARM processors.
diji1 said:
User Comment on Android Market:
At first I was thinking "right whatever mate" - but then I started thinking ... maybe bad idea?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The poster of that comment is simultaneous right and wrong.
If you have a multi-threaded app, it may well run faster and use less power by running two cores at a lower speed. However, for a single threaded app or task, a 2nd core is *never* going to be used, so it would just run slower.
The 2nd Core app is quite clear that running 2 cores all the time is going to hose your battery. However, if you are multitasking many apps, running just 1 core all the time will likely mean that that core has to run at a higher clockspeed all the time in order to cope with demand, and could also hose the battery.
Regards,
Dave
foxmeister said:
The poster of that comment is simultaneous right and wrong.
If you have a multi-threaded app, it may well run faster and use less power by running two cores at a lower speed. However, for a single threaded app or task, a 2nd core is *never* going to be used, so it would just run slower.
The 2nd Core app is quite clear that running 2 cores all the time is going to hose your battery. However, if you are multitasking many apps, running just 1 core all the time will likely mean that that core has to run at a higher clockspeed all the time in order to cope with demand, and could also hose the battery.
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So to be short, we do not need it?
tids2k said:
(...)
*Available kernels
- FM Kernel 1.5
- Abyss Kernel 3.1
- Tegrak Kernel Build 31 [ XXKL7]
- Tegrak Kernel Build 31 [XXKL8]
(...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What does that mean? FM Kernel and Abyss Kernel 3.1 are not supported because of the red color?
Or are these kernels supported?
I'm just asking because of
angelom said:
Yes, but there is no module to run Tegrak overclock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
robertberma said:
So to be short, we do not need it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I gather that is the case from Dave's reply.
The thing is I hardly ever get below 50% during a days use (gotta love that Note battery!) so I'm looking forward to seeing what this does. I have the juice to consider it worthwhile.
I've been on it for a week and phone is flying fast. Battery drain is not that bad for me. I for one, love it
From the Best : Galaxy Note
Great App
My note is super fast now and battery drain is less along with juice defender...
Fantastic app...keep it up mate
Try to make the home button awake lag less with this app if you can...only request...
Thanks! !!!!
I want to purchase tegrak ultimate, but I receive this error:
Anyone know if the second core will go off when the screen is off when set in dual core mode?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
It will remain on until you put the device in hotplug mode.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
The device itself is working fine and great, not much of anything needed, not offense to any, but i like it the way it is , might be when we get ICS, we may have some core mod needed.
deadlyheart4u said:
The device itself is working fine and great, not much of anything needed, not offense to any, but i like it the way it is , might be when we get ICS, we may have some core mod needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah...shame 2nd core doesn't work on ICS yet.
Roukie said:
Yeah...shame 2nd core doesn't work on ICS yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, my ICS Note uses 1 core 1200mhz yet its way smoother than Gingerbread builds with dual core 1400mhz.
/Amazed
Is this compatible with ICS? I am on ICS Stunner.
This post is moved to http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1947559
thanks man for your hard work will try it now
great app, but in conflict with CPU Tuner It changes the CPU Frequency but CPU Tuner tries also (have customized CPU Tuner so it saves battery better then you App does I think) but wil compare those two now
Thanks for the Trial Options!
mautz001 said:
great app, but in conflict with CPU Tuner It changes the CPU Frequency but CPU Tuner tries also (have customized CPU Tuner so it saves battery better then you App does I think) but wil compare those two now
Thanks for the Trial Options!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You might give me some advice.One Power Guard does not just set the CPU
pixiebob said:
thanks man for your hard work will try it now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How effective? I think I will write a help document.
fonter said:
How effective? I think I will write a help document.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
during night no interesting to compare because deep sleep work already great , no loss.
i have reinstall and try your application today to see if there are better battery usage during the day.
but for people who trying they must accept that phone is low cause optimal settings battery profile.
I'll give it a try thanks, battery defender don't seem to be working to well with faux kernel and my rom.
Sent from my Atrix
Motorola Atrix (MokeeOS v1.10.436)
Nexus 7 (Vanilla root flavour)
fonter: can you tell me more details how exactly your application initiating or improve deep sleep like you says in introduction.
pixiebob said:
fonter: can you tell me more details how exactly your application initiating or improve deep sleep like you says in introduction.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We optimize some kernel, CPU, WIFI etc.
New Version 1.5 Release
1.5 Version
1、Fix the custom mode bug
2、Fix get CPU frequency is null problem
Hi, everybody
1.6 version releases, can be updated.
1、Fix some custom mode bug
2、Fix the notification bug
The speed of the processor appears in Khz. It is incorrect that value. Is not it?
Where I can get the blonde? :silly:
Salu2
fonter said:
Hi, everybody
1.6 version releases, can be updated.
1、Fix some custom mode bug
2、Fix the notification bug
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.7 version releases
1、Fix bluetooth adapter bug
2、Fix Listview bug
Jolufa said:
The speed of the processor appears in Khz. It is incorrect that value. Is not it?
Where I can get the blonde? :silly:
Salu2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your reminder, we will change the CPU unit.
Guess its very use full for people who are lazy to manually tweak their rooted phones. Almost perfect now =].
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
xjerlzx said:
Guess its very use full for people who are lazy to manually tweak their rooted phones. Almost perfect now =].
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We consider that many users do not know how to modify the system parameters, do not know how to optimize.So we did some work.
Version 1.7 has been perfect, we already have new innovations, please waiting.
Is there any way to change the governor in the already made mode? It always set to ondemand how about I want to change it to other governor like badass / smartassv2?
Sent From My BioWonder V4
reddvilzz said:
Is there any way to change the governor in the already made mode? It always set to ondemand how about I want to change it to other governor like badass / smartassv2?
Sent From My BioWonder V4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can select the Custom mode,change cpu governor.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
New version release V1.8
Search "One Power Guard" from android play
New modified as follows
1.8 Version
1、Fix bitmap size exceeds VM budget
2、Fix motion event bug
3、Fix get running tasks exception
4、Fix popup window exception
5、Try fix notification bug
thanks man for your hard work will try it now
roger0220 said:
thanks man for your hard work will try it now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you like, please give a good rating.
I was able to hit 900mhz on gpu cores
and basically one of the fastest android devices in the market...
If anyone else has rooted device, please share your oc results!
update: so I was able to hit 910mhz after all tweaks,
and seems like 14 is practically the max for bus speed.
I tested 16, but from 13 it start to make no difference
and I get 2849 with bus speed 13 and 2851 with 14.
from 15, its the same so I decided to play safe. Stock bus max is 11.
Stock 900mhz uses Turbo voltage, and I can finish benchmark without visual glitches with NOM, which is 4 step down from the Turbo voltage. So I'd call that a significant undervolt. Well havent tested for extended gaming sessions, but for benchmarking, this is as far as it would go.
Also lowered stock 220mhz to 150mhz and gave RETENTION(lowest voltage) from stock MIN_SVS, so it would save more battery during idle.
I have attached KonaBess config file below, txt file, but keep in mind these are my settings for my device, and yours will be different. so take it with a grain of salt and only view as a guide or reference.
I am confident to say that this is clearly the max it can go with vanilla stock.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Can you share the konabess profile? Thanks a lot
BlackSoulxxx said:
Can you share the konabess profile? Thanks a lot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would love to, but I accidentally bricked the device while messing around with magisk modules, and just recovered.. haha
I'll share my settings once I think it is stable enough!
Hello @Nabicook ,
How did you rooted your xiaomi 12s ultra?
you can check my other post on rooting
energykriger said:
Hello @Nabicook ,
How did you rooted your xiaomi 12s ultra?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can check my other posts on rooting
Nabicook said:
I would love to, but I accidentally bricked the device while messing around with magisk modules, and just recovered.. haha
I'll share my settings once I think it is stable enough!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stable enough yet? Lol
GodKingKnight said:
Stable enough yet? Lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
seems like I would need a custom kernel to get stable past 900mhz.. no matter what I do, even though 900mhz runs fine on normal voltage, adding like 902mhz and applying turbo voltage causes stuttering during benchmark or any gpu utilization. so I am focusing more on undervolting atm. I mean, already one of the fastest devices on the market and simply undervolting it allows the device run cooler and stay longer on high frequencies
BlackSoulxxx said:
Can you share the konabess profile? Thanks a lot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my settings are up! Top-notch scores
Nabicook said:
my settings are up! Top-notch scores
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see there are two 910MHz step in your config. Is it intentional or something else?
BlackSoulxxx said:
I see there are two 910MHz step in your config. Is it intentional or something else?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just have limited access to pc atm (to monitor frequency) and I noticed android not using highest step all the time but using one two steps below(say I add 900, it uses 862, adding 910, 900 and 910 sometimes) based on kernel manager apps - which is not super accurate. I have no other ways to confirm if single 910mhz is fine. As I see no negative impact of using double steps, I just left it there to be sure.
If you can monitor gpu frequency and single step works fine for you, please let me know!
What is the power consumption in 3dmark wild life?
faffgawea said:
What is the power consumption in 3dmark wild life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ah rip, I have no way to monitor power consumption atm..
Nabicook said:
ah rip, I have no way to monitor power consumption atm..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can get the power consumption simply with perfdog,scene5.
This mod isn't working correctly I don't think, I am attempting on putting together a magisk module for overclocking cpu cores 0-4 a tad amount to their max range on Walt governor, but I think konabess isnt correctly overclocking as /sys/class/kgsl/kgsl-3d0/max_pwrlevel and other parameters aren't changed
Please tell me if it is necessary to enter these commands through Windows CMD or is it enough to install the application and use your settings? For example, without these commands, after changing the frequency on the OnePlus 9 Pro, the phone stopped booting.
fastboot --disable-verification --disable-verity flash vbmeta vbmeta.img
fastboot --disable-verification --disable-verity flash vbmeta_system vbmeta_system.img
fastboot --disable-verification --disable-verity flash vbmeta_vendor vbmeta_vendor.img
XiaomiEU MIUI 14. no need
Im use your profile but why only i can see running at 710 the gpu... Also which is The best drivers right now and for emulators and ram usage also about Netflix is fixed? Just i got today the phone. If someone can answer my questions thx alot guys.
Imbagamer13 said:
Im use your profile but why only i can see running at 710 the gpu... Also which is The best drivers right now and for emulators and ram usage also about Netflix is fixed? Just i got today the phone. If someone can answer my questions thx alot guys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also noticed the 710 MHz. I opened Genshin Impact to see how much higher the frequency could go, but in this game it was not above 550 (approximately)
Me im playing eggns ps2 at max and my gpu goed to maximum also im using rgb controller so this is limit control? Or just we cant see it by using kernel apps