(App comparative) Benchmarck Comparator - Android Apps and Games

Dear All,
A lot of people here are trying to compare their phones, their performance using benchmarks. Or, each benchmark tool has it own set of test and of instructions, take advantage of the multi-core capabilities, or not...
Also I wanted to have a tools to compare versions of the same rom in terms of performance evolution.
For this reasons, I started a page on my site, the principle is as follow:
Clean installation of the device and full wipe.
No custom kernel if not already installed in the ROM
Installation of the following Benchmark tools:
Antutu:It can run a full test of a key project, through the "Memory Performance","CPU Integer Performance","CPU Floating point Performance","2D 3D Graphics Performance","SD card reading/writing speed","Database IO" performance testing on the mobile phone Performance of the hardware to make score.​
CF-Bench:CF-Bench is (mainly) CPU and memory benchmark tool specifically designed to be able to handle multi-core devices, produce a fairly stable score, and test both native as well managed code performance.​
Linpack:The LINPACK Benchmarks are a measure of a system’s floating point computing power. Introduced by Jack Dongarra, they measure how fast a computer solves a dense N by N system of linear equations Ax = b, which is a common task in engineering. The solution is obtained by Gaussian elimination with partial pivoting, with 2/3*N3 + 2*N2 floating point operations. The result is reported in Millions of FLoating-point Operations Per Second (MFLOP/s, sometimes simply called FLOPS).​
Quadrant:Quadrant is a CPU, I/O and 3D graphics benchmark. The Standard Edition requires an Internet connection to compute benchmark results and is supported by ads.​
Vellamo:Vellamo is a mobile Web benchmark that evaluates browser performance on Android devices. Vellamo provides a holistic view into browser performance and stability, including networking, JavaScript, rendering, and user experience.​
Reboot of the machine
15 seconds of wait time for the machine to boot and launch of the bench
Reboot between each benchmark
Of course I will try to include as many roms and versions as possible but for that I will need your help. I still need to think of a detail protocol to submit the result and make sure the benchmarks are run for all in the exact same way (no overclocking and all. I also in the short terms would like to introduce a bench to stress test the battery and have a comparison here too.
Any suggestion is of course more that welcome and the page can be found here:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Test protocol
Test protocol
On the rom you currently have in your device, download:
AnTuTu Benchmark: https://market.android.com/details?id=com.antutu.ABenchMark
CF-Bench: https://market.android.com/details?id=eu.chainfire.cfbench
Linpack: https://market.android.com/details?id=com.greenecomputing.linpack
Quadrant Standard Edition: https://market.android.com/details?id=com.aurorasoftworks.quadrant.ui.standard
Vellamo Mobile Web Benchmark: https://market.android.com/details?id=com.quicinc.vellamo
Battery Benchmark: https://market.android.com/details?id=com.batterybench
All those benchmark tools are FREE
Once those installed, I used Titanium or myBackup pro to extract the APKs and move them to a folder on my desktop.
Once this is done
Install the rom you want to benchmark
Full wipe (data and cache)!!!
Once the rom booted, no account must been set
No gmail, no mail, no twitter, no facebook....
This is to avoid any kind of background loading that could perturb the bench
MAKE SURE YOU HAVE a WIFI INTERNET CONNECTION SET UP somme bench need it
install all the benchmark tools using abd, here is what my install scrept look like:
adb.exe install -r "./Bench APK/antutu_v2.4.apk"
adb.exe install -r "./Bench APK/cf-bench_v1.1.apk"
adb.exe install -r "./Bench APK/linpack_v1.2.8.apk"
adb.exe install -r "./Bench APK/quadrant_v1.1.7.apk"
adb.exe install -r "./Bench APK/Vellamo_v1.0.4.apk"
adb.exe install -r "./Bench APK/batterybench_v2.6"
adb.exe reboot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unplug the phone from your computer and plug it to the power supply
Once the phone restarted, wait 20 seconds to have the phone completely loaded and all processes launched
Start the bench
Write the results
Reboot the phone
back to step 07 until all benchmarks are done*
For Linpack: the Single thread bench will be launched just before the multi-thread one WITHOUT REBOUT in betweend
For Battery Benchmark:
the battery must be fully charged before starting the test
the 5% Bench will be the one chosen in order to be "fast" (the most inaccurate but gives an idea and a base to compare)
For the results, the should be presented as follow:
Device
Brand: ex. HTC
Name: ex. Desire Z
Rom
Name: ex. MIUI OsiMood
Cook: ex. CarpeNoctem
Link: ex. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=958475
Version: ex. 1.10.21
Min CPU speed Frequency (can be read in Antutu Info tab): ex. 216.5
Max CPU speed Frequency (can be read in Antutu Info tab): ex. 1003.5
Android version (can be read in Antutu Info tab): ex. 2.3.7
Antutu
version: ex. 2.4
RAM: ex. 305
CPU Integer: ex. 631
CPU Float-point: ex. 275
2D Graphics: ex. 287
3D Graphics: ex: 659
Database IO: ex: 265
SD Card Write: ex. 48
SD Card Read: ex. 170
Total Score: ex. 2999
CF-Bench
version: ex. 1.1
Native Score 4401
Java Score 1641
Overall Score 2745
Linpack
version: 1.2.8
ST - MFLOPS: 41.543
ST- Time (in second) 2.02
ST - Norm Res 5.68
MT - MFLOPS 36.563
MT- Time (in second) 4.61
MT - Norm Res 3.24
Quadrant
version 1.1.7
Sccore 2301
Vellamo
version 1.0.3
Score 785
Battery Benchmark
version: 2.6
Elapsed Time: 1374
Test completed - N° of loop: 252
Test completed - N° of GET: 125

One more to be edited soon

thanks for this now i have a way to tell if my phone is fast and efficient

For the battery Benchmark, I've come through this one that seems to be the most systematic in terms of protocols: https://market.android.com/details?id=com.batterybench
Does anybody have experience to share about it?
Also how many people out there would be willing to help me to populate the database ?

nice info ...thanx!

Sure, no problem.
If you are willing to help to populate the database, please let me know:
the device you are using
the rom
its version
and if you are willing to send me an update on every revision
The best is if you are the cook of the rom.
Thanks

Nobody's interested ?

Related

Overclocking the magician - fastest stable speed?

I've tried overclocking the cpu on my mini using pocket hackmaster. The fastest setting I've been able to use which was stable was:
CPU: 468(T), Bus: 117, Mem: 59, LCD: 59 (Mhz)
Has anyone else tried overclocking their magicians? What's the fastest speed you've been able to use?
On the other side of the coin, has anyone tried underclocking it? If so, any improvements to battery life with a slower cpu speed?
I think battery life would be improved on any pda when lowering cpu cycles. Make sure you have insurance on your phone too, I managed to kill one by overclocking.
Mine Mini is rock stable at 1073Mhz, 143, 36,72.
liusam said:
Mine Mini is rock stable at 1073Mhz, 143, 36,72.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure? Have U check w/ any benchmark program? 2 o/c program I know (Xcpu scaler, PHM) will report fake clock value at some point.
rocket said:
I've tried overclocking the cpu on my mini using pocket hackmaster. The fastest setting I've been able to use which was stable was:
CPU: 468(T), Bus: 117, Mem: 59, LCD: 59 (Mhz)
Has anyone else tried overclocking their magicians? What's the fastest speed you've been able to use?
On the other side of the coin, has anyone tried underclocking it? If so, any improvements to battery life with a slower cpu speed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
520MHz (
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
)
--> http://forum.xda-developers.com/viewtopic.php?t=24290
The Benchmark result fpor GXmark is 1352 when performed at 1073Mhz. :roll:
liusam said:
The Benchmark result fpor GXmark is 1352 when performed at 1073Mhz. :roll:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GXmark?
I personally found PHM to be a better overclocking program than XCPUScalar.
I added manually 618MHz (124,62,62,T) which gives an SI benchmark of 329, faster than all those over 900Mhz clock rates I got by PHM's automatic settings. Some of them might be fake but some of them just gives the same SI benchmark for the same bus speed no matter what the processor speed is.
I set my MDA Compact to 520Mhz, bus:130, mem:65, LSD: 65 with Pocket Hack Master 2005 v3.10.007! It runs stable and I think thet is pretty enough. :roll: 8) The battery life is shorter but still acceptable!
liusam said:
Mine Mini is rock stable at 1073Mhz, 143, 36,72.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
!!!! :roll: :shock: liusam! Can you tell us what program you used or how did you succeed this? Because this settings are very strange!!! It's very "interesting" for me what this multiplayer is? :lol: I think a multiplayer like this: 7,5034965034965034965034965034965 is a quiet impossible! In my opinion the max. multiplayer is FSBx4!
I set my o2 mini to CPU: 620(T), Bus: 124, Mem: 61, LCD: 61 (Mhz) , It was running pretty good but sometime , somehow it slow down for a few sec . But anyway i think the good Speed is CPU: 512(T), Bus: 130, Mem: 65, LCD: 65 (Mhz) with this setting i can see it not fast as the 620 but more stable . Anyway i just get back to the normal speed because i did too many test and it freezing my o2 now , IF i see anything interesting i will tell you guy
HI
where can i get the software to overclock my Jam and also the benchmarking software ??
regards
reo
Are you guys gettings speeds higher than normal with or without the power lead attached? XCPUScalar says you only get 520mhz with power lead in (which it did, although it hard reset when I disconnected the power cable )
I wouldn't mind trying other overclocking software if they're more successful, 520mhz is lovely to use, so smooth.
What stable speed can you guys get without the power lead in, and with what settings?
V
S100 Stabel at CPU: 702, Bus: 117, Mem: 59, LCD: 59 (Mhz)
I run whit 6 scale config. from 208Mhz to 702Mhz
In Pocket Hack Master try "fast bus=on" and your bus speed increase without problems. For example, now I have 208 mhz bus:
CPU=520 BUS=208 RAM=52 LCD=104
I use following settings:
L=16 N=5 A=0 LCD_26=0 Turbo=on Halfturbo=off Fast Bus=on
if N=6 then CPU=624 - no problem for my S110
@truedim
It doesn't work for me with N=6.
But it works with
L=18 -> 585 MHZ, SI=367 [234:59:59:T].
Any higher speed resets my device. I believe it depends on components tolerance. Btw, your 520Mhz settings raised my SI from 313 (std 520) to 322.
Silver
how to set fast bus or choose L=18 -> 585 MHZ ? i can set only 1 stable frequency which is 520/133 can u tell me how to set higher one ?
ok i solved the problem : ) i just need to add manual speed :F
520:260:65:65 gives me a SI of 373. It's stable as well.
The Benchmark result fpor GXmark is 1352 when performed at 1073Mhz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ur Jam is running at 1073mhz? U must b joking dude. It will fried up ur proccesor b4 u even reaches 1000mhz
I am running 1073 too,and you should also check it
I suggest anyone who claimed they get a 700mzh+ clock magician do a testing w/ TCMP Player. Take a look at what clock speed it detected and a "REAL" benchmark testing w/ Video/auido.

Battery Tweak Epic Edition RC1

Plans for next revision:
*Add in Decad3nce's temperature control
*Bug nullghost till he gets init scripts running so we can have this startup at boot
This is really a tool for power users
If you don't consider yourself 'comfortable' with messing with your phone, then don't.
This is mostly the work of collin_ph, all the ideas are mostly his and I have only contributed in part to getting some things functioning correctly and some optimizations for the Epic.
What does it do?
This tweak creates a service that periodically checks the phone's power source.
If the power source changes, it reconfigures the device for maximum performace, battery and safety.
Tweaks memory settings for current power source
Re-clocks CPU based upon battery remaining or current power source
Reclocks for maximum performance if on AC power
Reclocks for maximum performance and charging safety if on USB
Reclocks for performance and battery if on Battery
As Battery life is diminished, Maximum CPU frequency is lowered
Tweaks scaling charactaristics depending on power sourcee
CPU Scales up less frequently on battery power
CPU Scales up more frequently on USB/AC power
The CPU is allowed to scale dynamically in all charging states based upon CPU usage
Includes a batt-cfg utility to configure the system
You may load 1 of 3 pre built profiles
Manually configure CPU Frequencies in all charging states
Determine the percentage of underclocking as the battery drains
Configure how often to poll the power state / battery statys
Disable batt.sh service from running at startup
Includes a batt-rm.sh uninstall utility
Includes a batt-diag diagnostic utility
Includes optional Disk performance tweaks (enabled by default)
The Tools
The entire 'application' is written in shell code and was first written just to give a performance and battery boost, but since has evolved more and more.
All the tools mentioned will be utilized either through the terminal, or in adb shell.
batt.sh
This is the core of the entire script. Don't mess with it.
The one thing you should do after installing the script:
Code:
Code:
pidof batt.sh
If theres any number showing up after it, then it's working fine.
batt-cfg
This is the 'main menu' of sorts, as it gives the user all the options and allows them to toggle tweaks/mods on the fly.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
batt-diag
It's a diagnostics utility, allowing you or someone knowledgeable to figure out any issues that you may be having with your device and be able to pinpoint exactly where the problem is.
batt-diag -v gives a more thorough output as you can see here; http://pastie.org/1162034
batt-rm.sh
It's a battery tweak removal script, follow the onscreen prompts and it should remove just about any trace of the battery tweak script.
The Presets
The presets are just default configurations that I have set up that can make your phone more efficient without you, the user, having to manually set everything.
The preset of 800 literally means that 800000 is the scaling_max_freq, or the max frequency, that your phone can achieve after you enable it.
Just typing 1, and then enter, you'll be ready and set to go. Same with 2 or 3.
Customize Settings
This is only for the experienced user, and it allows you to manipulate most/ifnotall the configurables on your device.
Note, you do not need to configure anything to enable this battery mod. Default settings will be assigned at 800MHz.
All the settings explain what each option does, so read them carefully.
Disk Boost
Remounts via noatime and nodiratime. Look up what that means on your own, and why it benefits performance the way it does.
Prerequisites needed to run this
Phoenix kernel 1.48 with Epic Experience should run this just fine
If you're running any other kind of rom, feel free to try it but i cannot guarantee that it will work.
This script will WORK even if you don't have the import call at boot, but it won't survive on the next reboot.
You can check via:
Code:
Code:
pidof batt.sh
NOTE: This script will also prompt you to try to run itself as root if you use it in terminal.
Contributors:
Collin_ph
Decad3nce
myn
onicrom
shabbypenguin
nullghost (aka tehdarkknight)
*make sure you are running these as root*
*disable setcpu while running this*
*been reported as rom manager fc's after batt tweak, simple fix reinstall rom manager* - thanks for the tip Raiderep
Finally got that working
This is perfect. As a former hero user, I was thinking to myself a couple days ago "I wonder if anyone is going to port the collin_ph battery tweak," and here it is.
Thanks!
I'm about to head into work and I got this downloaded. I'll put it to the test for the day. Thanx for the port or whatever you call it, I had this on hero and loved being able to get rid of setcpu(which I never really liked) but still have something governing battery use
Is this compatible or even needed with the mix up kernel?
compatible? maybe as i said this is known working on phoenix kernel as for others i cannot say. needed? well that depends are you happy with your current battery life?
Using Phoenix kernel 1.48 with Epic Experience bogged down my phone after installing, im only at 76% battery life, i cant imagine how slow it would be at 20%
edit:
its fine now, i guess it had to load initially?
Whats the best settings you think we should run..for the best battery life
800mhz or you can use configure to keep that even lower... obviously the lower the cpu freq the less voltage it uses = better battery life
I just set this up to the 800mhz defaults. I will come back with results
How does this govern cpu clocking and usage? I'm assuming there's no live governer such as ondemand or interactive at play here?
phoenix 1.48 has a working interactive governor
shabbypenguin said:
compatible? maybe as i said this is known working on phoenix kernel as for others i cannot say. needed? well that depends are you happy with your current battery life?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think anybody is That being said, great work shabby, can't wait til nullghost gets his init scripts working.
shabbypenguin said:
phoenix 1.48 has a working interactive governor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So how does this affect setcpu? I'm runnin baked 1.3 ghz kernel..does this mean after I install I won't be at 1.3?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
this is set for 800/1ghz/1.2ghz i included the configure option so people can make teh .conf however they see fit.. if batt.sh runs on it then it will scale from 1.3ghz after you configure it. witht he beta versions i dont believe anyone got it working on baked snack but if you try please let me know if it works what doesnt etc etc
when i try to run batt.sh i get this message...Mount: cant find /mnt/sdcard in /proc/mounts..what does this mean
its an issue im trying to figure out, batt.sh works fine without it, thats part of the disk speedups, in batt-cfg you can disable it
new feature will update tomorrow
not sure why but shootme is screwy for me recently as you can see. i have 0% tws, 37% voice calls at 30 mins 29s display is on for over an hour. screen is at auto, 3g, drm services RUNNING. oh yea im at 1.2ghz
Still have problems with this tweak...this is wat iam getting when I do batt-cfg I hit number one and I get this....
Loading 800mhz default
[: Bad number
Save settings...
Settings saved
Starting batt.sh
Note: when you exit ADB or terminal, you may have to hit
CTRL-C
Then my phone freezes and I have to pull the battery
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk

smartbench scores!

so lets see what youve got? i didnt see a similar thread..
what roms the fastest?
heres mine, cm7 nightlies/w pershoots oc kernel.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Got 2241/3080 (on smartbench 2010)
and 3955/2787 (on smartbench 2011)
Need more numbers ? check below:
aasoror said:
Market links for the benchmarking suites
Linpack.
NBench
Benchmark
An3DBench
FPS2D
NenaMark1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is the updated results
Code:
Linpack :
EEE pad: 42.40
Gtab: 49.459
Gtab2: 50.655
NBench Memory:
EEE pad: 2.80
Gtab: 4.621
Gtab2: 4.672
NBench Integer:
EEE pad: 3.90
Gtab: 5.408
Gtab2: 5.46
NBench Float:
EEE pad: 1.20
Gtab: 1.605
Gtab2: 1.612
Benchmark Graphics:
EEE pad: 344.80
Gtab: 515.5409
Gtab2: 470.729
Benchmark CPU:
EEE pad: 3,125.80
Gtab: 4,051.7322
Gtab2: 4133.36
Benchmark Memory:
EEE pad: 998.60
Gtab: 1,178.2655
Gtab2: 1,167.0201
Benchmark FileSystem:
EEE pad: 359.00
Gtab: 266.4564
Gtab2: 361.4942
An3DBench:
EEE pad: 8,579
Gtab: 6,799
Gtab2: 6,912
FPS2D:
EEE pad: 68.00
Gtab: 50
Gtab2: 50
NenaMark1
EEE pad: 35
Gtab: 50.4
Gtab2: 50.5
EEE pad: stock HC
Gtab: pershoot Kernel 2.6.32.38 (0417), CM7 #41
Gtab2: pershoot Kernel 2.6.32.39 (0422), CM7 #42
SM2011
VEGANtab-ginger (hence the screenshot) with pershoots 4/20 oc kernel
Calkulin's G-tab1.1 and Pershoot's kernel 2.6.32.39 - Benchmark 2011. 1977/4277.
Sorry can't get the photo attached....
Vegan7-RC1 with Pershoot OC kernel
Smartbench2011: 4582/2218
SmartBench 2011: 4832/2210
Didn't think to take a picture at the time, was making a spreadsheet before/after stuff. I uploaded it on another thread somewhere.
VeganGinger RC1, pershoot's OC kernel
4384 on Calkulins/pershoots latest at 1.4.
Smartbench: 4703/1986
Using Calkulin / Pershoot OC
Is Smartbench a valid benchmark?
OK, two things in one post...
First - I've tried a couple of screenshotting programs to try and document what I've found so far, but both (AndroSS and Shoot Me(IIRC))have generated nothing but blank black 1024x600 files. So what are y'all using to get the screenshots?
I'm running VEGAn 7.0.0 RC1
Second, I decided to try out the Smartbench 2011 on my gTab, and had very inconsistent results (hence the desire for screenshots). According to Smartbench, my stock (except for ROM) gTab at 1Ghz hits speeds close to what others are hitting with 1.3 and 1.4Ghz OCed machines. I topped out at around 3725 or so, where the "stock" gTab listed in the results page was around 2800 or so. That's a full third faster than the reported stock speed. Rebooting my gTab dropped me back down to the realm of stock (2800-ish), but I've found a way to repeat my results after doing it a few times. Unfortunately, this calls into question the overall accuracy of Smartbench's testing algorithms.
I reloaded the three apps I had running when I hit the higher speed:
- Words Free (WWF for Android)
- Scrabble Helper
- Dolphin HD with the translate, site to PDF and TabMix plugins
Then loaded up the XDA website and read a number of pages in the forum, swipe scrolling up and down through the article listings.
Then I ran Smartbench again. Back into the 3000s. More browsing and scrolling, ran it again. 3300 or so, and it's stayed thereabouts since then. I haven't noticed a >30% increase in response or overall speed, so I think the numbers are actually incorrect.
Could someone please see if they can repeat these results? Also, if I can get a working screenshot program, I'll post what I get.
Are you guys using VEGAn-Ginger using the internal settings to overclock or are you using SetCPU?
Just Jack said:
OK, two things in one post...
First - I've tried a couple of screenshotting programs to try and document what I've found so far, but both (AndroSS and Shoot Me(IIRC))have generated nothing but blank black 1024x600 files. So what are y'all using to get the screenshots?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Screenshot ER (free/donationware to xda members, or a buck on the market) works, as does tethering via USB and using ddms to take a shot from the desktop.
And yeah, benchmarks are iffy.
schettj said:
Screenshot ER (free/donationware to xda members, or a buck on the market) works, as does tethering via USB and using ddms to take a shot from the desktop.
And yeah, benchmarks are iffy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Coming from the realm of PC testing and evals, I'd definitely concur on the iffyness (?) of benchmarking, but I've generally been accustomed to at least seeing the same skewed benchmarks from the same package run-to-run. This just really threw me for some reason. I found it odd that just browsing cold skew the results in a positive direction. Negative I could understand...
4581/2810
Running pershoot's latest kernel @ 1.4Ghz
And CM7.0.2
Whenever I run 1.4ghz test, it gives me an invalid result. I can run at 1.2 or 1.0 fine. Anybody else have this problem? I have a similar issue with Quadrant.
I am running Vegantab ginger with Pershoots latest kernel - setCPU
npavlo said:
Whenever I run 1.4ghz test, it gives me an invalid result. I can run at 1.2 or 1.0 fine. Anybody else have this problem? I have a similar issue with Quadrant.
I am running Vegantab ginger with Pershoots latest kernel - setCPU
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same issue I have.
4752/2211
Clean flash with VeganGinger RC1/Pershoots latest

[APP][2.1+] Benchmark & Tuning 2.1

Hello XDA, my name is Christian and I just published a new app on the Android Market.
This app is a must have if you want to run a quick but precise benchmark on your phone, without wasting your battery's energy. The tested components will be your cpu, memory and input/output capabilities.
This app fully supports multi-core devices and gives you the possibility to choose between single-threaded or multi-threaded tests.
If you want, you can quickly set your cpu frequency and governor, instead of having to use other cpu app.
Submit your scores to our online database and compete with your friends! If you are offline you can also compare your score with stock devices's scores.
Enjoy and have a good score!
Get it on Google play or download it from HERE.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Get it on Google play or download it from HERE.
Change log
Version 2.1
-Unlocked: Choose theme
-Unlocked: Run again button
-Unlocked: Detailed score types
-Unlocked: Sort by button
Version 2.07:
-Fixed FC's
Version 2.0:
-New design.
-Option to change the app theme (Full version).
-Benchmarks are made more accurate. (old scores are not shown anymore)
-System info: Battery stats, the system build prop and the kernel config.
-All app info's are filterable for a better readability.
-Offline scores storage (Full version).
-New stock scores: 22 devices benchmarked.
-Scores appear now with android version info.
-"time on state" re-designed. Now you can sort by time in frequency if you want.
-Android version appears now in the "Scores stats".
Version 1.83:
-Fixed network access.
Version 1.81:
-Some minor bug fixes.
-Changed network access a little bit.
Version 1.8:
-Migrated the scores database to a new web server. The old one was failing all the time.
Version 1.7:
-Added "Jump To" button in the scores.
Version 1.64:
-Added "Trial state" menu. Now you can see how much time your trial has remaining.
Version 1.63:
-Just fixed the link on the "Rate this app" button.
Version 1.62:
-Fixed the wrong IO score calculation. I'm deleting the old wrong scores.
Version 1.61:
- Changed the error message when fetching results from the internet. Our web server (free hosting) is facing some issues, I hope they fix it soon!
Version 1.6
Added refresh button in Scores.
Added result type "Device Browser". Now you can see the scores of all the other devices grouped by device name.
Added Online Stats menu, where you can see the most used devices, kernels and cpu frequencies.
Small fix on setting cpu frequency.
Version 1.51:
Improved tuning on multi-core devices
Version 1.5:
Added "Choose I/O scheduler" in Performance Tuning.
Added options menu entries: "Contact me","Faq","Rate this app"
Version 1.47:
Fixed the freeze/forced close when scrolling more than 1000 scores.
Version 1.45:
Some error prevention fixes.
Version 1.44:
Removed external storage access permission. It was there by mistake.
Version 1.42:
Increased scroll smoothness a little.
Version 1.41:
Fixed scroll bug.
Version 1.4:
Smoother scores scrolling.
Added optional "cpu frequency and kernel version" info with results submission.
Added "Your device - All results " score type.
Added "Your device - Users best results " score type.
nice work !
but i can't see the app screenshots
youweit said:
nice work !
but i can't see the app screenshots
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you
Do you mean here or on the Android Market?
cgollner said:
Thank you
Do you mean here or on the Android Market?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
on the xda forum, now i can see it
Nice concept! Can't believe someone hasn't thought of this yet! Downloading now and will report back. Thanks for making this!
Sent from my Dread Ginger Revo using Tapatalk.
spc_hicks09 said:
Nice concept! Can't believe someone hasn't thought of this yet! Downloading now and will report back. Thanks for making this!
Sent from my Dread Ginger Revo using Tapatalk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
Have a nice score!
Update for the app:
Version 1.4:
Smoother scores scrolling.
Added optional "cpu frequency and kernel version" info with results submission.
Added "Your device - All results " score type.
Added "Your device - Users best results " score type.
Grab it HERE
cgollner said:
Update for the app:
Version 1.4:
Smoother scores scrolling.
Added optional "cpu frequency and kernel version" info with results submission.
Added "Your device - All results " score type.
Added "Your device - Users best results " score type.
Grab it HERE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome update, danke you
Its funny to see my kernels on the top, GG!
franciscofranco said:
Awesome update, danke you
Its funny to see my kernels on the top, GG!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
doesn't suprise me
cgollner said:
doesn't suprise me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you please attach apk file???
mr.harsh said:
Can you please attach apk file???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I can. There it is
New update:
Removed external storage access permission. It was there by mistake.
how it's compared with quadrant ?
aquaphx said:
how it's compared with quadrant ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you asking in terms of test types, score types?
What is the difference type you want to know?
New update:
Some error prevention fixes.
I tested many benchmarks and did not find good and exact variant.
Quadrant - lack of support, graphic glitches, very inaccurate i/o test
Linpack - useless (it counts PI... who needs to know this parameter?)
Benchmark - lack of support, project seems abandoned
AnTuTu - not bad, but inaccurate too
and others....
As you are developer of new benchmark, how do you plan prevent I/O cheating?
It is main problem in Quadrant. You can simply boost overall rating cause I/O parameter is abnormal.
How do you plan filter common and overclocked results in main db? Your list of stock devices contains 14 examples, but it is too few...
VERY Different scores
I tried the app and got two very different scores during my first and second run... first run got 7288 and second one got a substantially higher score, 11032.
I'm running stock rom so didn't tinker anything in between first and second one.
What to make of this?
Sidekick 4g sght839 4860 1.0 solo core none over clocked
Sent from my SGH-T839 using XDA App
Kool... gonna give it a go now on my lil Defy+
idea 4 u
i use many benchmark apps and see that all apps are 1 app with different names
add many feature for example :display benchmark , sd card benchmark , G-sensor benchmark , launcher app speed benchmark , apps speed benchmark ,.....
if a person that want bechmark sd card (r/w) and gpu , he must that install many apps
u create a app with many important feature and with new Graphical
be succeed

[Update]Antutu Benchmark V6.0 Beta OPEN TEST

Antutu benchamark V6.0 of 2015 is ready for you!! We are sure that this version will surprise you in many ways. New logo, New UI, and most important, new features on the testing items.
Before the final version, we would like to introduce these new features on our latest Version Antutu benchmark V6.0 beta 2.
Antutu want to invite you to do the beta testing before the final release. Your suggestions of any kind is so welcomed, bugs, languages, user experiences .... Email us by : marketing @antutu.com.
You could just post your score in this thread to share with friends here!!!OR POST your question here!
Download link:
Android :
http://show.antutu.net/t/antutu-benchmark-v6beta.apk
IOS( need*jailbreak*your*phone)
http://show.antutu.net/t/antutu-benchmark-ios-v6beta.ipa
What's new in testing items? (For more detail info, please view http://www.antutu.com/en/view.shtml?id=8161 )
1. New designed 3D Testing Scene.
On-Screen Garden and Off-Screen Marooned
2. Add new UX testing items and increase UX testing proportion
New UX testing item in Antutu benchmark V6.0: data security, data processing, strategy game, image processing, I/O performance and etc.
3. New CPU Testing Added
4. New Score Proportion in Antutu V6.0
The proportion of CPU+RAM : UX : 3D design to be 1:1:1. The proportion of 3D and UX items have been increased. Proportion of CPU and RAM have been decreased.
5. Cross-platform
Antutu benchmark V6 could support Android and iOS,also supportWindows Mobile 10,Windows,Mac OS XP platform.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
AnTuTuLabs said:
Antutu benchamark V6.0 of 2015 is ready for you!! We are sure that this version will surprise you in many ways. New logo, New UI, and most important, new features on the testing items.
Before the final version, we would like to introduce these new features on our latest Version Antutu benchmark V6.0 beta 2.
Antutu want to invite you to do the beta testing before the final release. Your suggestions of any kind is so welcomed, bugs, languages, user experiences .... Email us by : marketing
Download link:
Android :
http://show.antutu.net/t/antutu-benchmark-v6beta.apk
IOS( need*jailbreak*your*phone)
http://show.antutu.net/t/antutu-benchmark-ios-v6beta.ipa
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
w0000t
My hTC ONE M9 ...
flo musti said:
My hTC ONE M9 ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your testing .
This QR code is to avoid the “PS”score. In previous version, some people use PS score to attract eyeballs. But by scan this code, we can get the actual score of the device.
what it is downloading... what 3d recorces about 50-100mb...??? [emoji15] [emoji15]
Sent from my SM-G7102 using Tapatalk
Samsung Galaxy S6 / hTC ONE M9
Nexus 6p , nexus 9 and nexus 10
AnTuTuLabs said:
Antutu benchamark V6.0 of 2015 is ready for you!! We are sure that this version will surprise you in many ways. New logo, New UI, and most important, new features on the testing items.
Before the final version, we would like to introduce these new features on our latest Version Antutu benchmark V6.0 beta 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quick question @AnTuTuLabs, why the 3d score for adreno 330 is so low(in my case htc m8 tested on lollipop/mm)? From your test, comparable gpu's are looking like 3-4 times faster and geting that much higher score in the test? Not like it matters that much, but I am curious?
for the eyeballs....
Galaxy S4 CM12.1 yesterday nightly...
non-64 bit chips seems to scoring low on 3d
some contributions
1st pic
- stamina mode on
- use battery only
- used for a while
- recent app page and notifications not cleared
2nd picture
- stamina mode off
- charged with xiaomi powerbank
- straight after 1st test
- recent app page and notifications not cleared
3rd pic
- Stamina mode off
- charged with xiaomi powerbank
- Place the phone on a copper CPU cooler ~5mins
- recent app page and notifications cleared
4th pic
- Stamina mode off
- charged with xiaomi powerbank
- Place the phone on a ice pack ~5mins
- recent app page and notifications cleared
rapak said:
non-64 bit chips seems to scoring low on 3d
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nexus 6 scored about 21k in 3D, and it uses 32bit Snapdragon 805.
My Lenovo with Snapdragon 801 scored only 3,5k in 3D test, much less than much much slower Mali-T760-MP2.
This is weird.
@AnTuTuLabs Explanation?
Okarina26 said:
for the eyeballs....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fake!
IvY74 said:
Fake!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not at all......
Brand new note 5 low score?
Hey guys, I love my new phone, but my antutu score isn't perfect obviously. Wondering if my low 3d garden score could be caused by a defective gpu? This is honestly one of the highest scores I've gotten, and it doesn't make a lot of sense. I'm running a debloated version of 5.1.1. Most samsung/T-mobile apps have been removed.
I'm actually super confused and give up trying to upload my screen shot, so here's my numbers:
Everything within 200 of the normal "g note 5" in the results tab, but the 3d garden is 8k/12k.
trix4rix said:
Hey guys, I love my new phone, but my antutu score isn't perfect obviously. Wondering if my low 3d garden score could be caused by a defective gpu? This is honestly one of the highest scores I've gotten, and it doesn't make a lot of sense. I'm running a debloated version of 5.1.1. Most samsung/T-mobile apps have been removed.
I'm actually super confused and give up trying to upload my screen shot, so here's my numbers:
Everything within 200 of the normal "g note 5" in the results tab, but the 3d garden is 8k/12k.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My 3d garden is ALWAYS low, 7-8.5k at BEST Evgeny though my marooned score is over 14k....i can't figure smh i have great asv scores, all 12 except gpu is 10 and that's where my slowdown is...
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Just 4k GPU score on my galaxy s 5..seriously???how bad is the adreno 330 GPU that it scores so less..??
This app is unstable in my situation
I have a Redmi 1s and after Run 3D test it stuck on 0% for too long and then if i click stop it gives FC
Guys,
There is a problem. I have tvbox CS968M, htp chipset version, Android 4.4.2, now, with this version, Antutu will not start, it will reboot device. With all previous versions, I had no problems at all. The update came through Play Store and created problem.
Could you try to fix it, please.

Categories

Resources