Related
I'm getting this device by this week. I'm afraid of the seller change the hardware of my phone (I'm not getting this device from retail store.)
Can you guys provide me the quadrant and linpack score of i9023 (original rom or non rooted and non-oc)?
Thanks!
From Melvinchng.
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA Premium App
Quadrants & Linpack doesn't matter. But if you insist,
Stock Quadrant would be around ~1200
Linpack ~10
It is so low??
Phonedog get 1880 quadrant for non oc I think.
Anyone has any different?
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA Premium App
Install a custom Rom and you will score 3000 without oc
SGS2 = 950. Sensation = mid-700's. G2X = ?
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.quicinc.vellamo
G2X running EB1.05 Froyo OC 1.5
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
jabhome said:
G2X running EB1.05 Froyo OC 1.5
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not even close to being right. I'm not overclocked and can't get over 775 and there is no way possible a OC to 1.5ghz can more than double that.
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA Premium App
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Pretty cool benchmark....my score
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Running the exact same ROM as the guy above at the same clock speed, my score was 856.
Edit: by the guy above I meant the guy running EB1.05.
Sent from my LG G2x
775 running on stock Rom and 863 running EB 1.05
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA Premium App
maybe the new app is a little buggy
I dunno if this one is accurate.
got a 954 with cm nightly 74 and faux oc/uv at 1.1ghz, then got a 2230 with same rom/kernal at 1.5ghz
cy888 said:
I dunno if this one is accurate.
got a 954 with cm nightly 74 and faux oc/uv at 1.1ghz, then got a 2230 with same rom/kernal at 1.5ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha sounds a little buggy to me
844 running CM latest nightly no OC. Stock CM kernel.
832 running stock CM7 @ 190 density. No custom kernels.
My score was on par with what it said Sensations were. I've heard CM7 benchmarks are usually lower compared to straight stock roms.
This also seems to heavily rely on browser technology. I wonder if the SGS2 marks higher with its acceleration?
LG G2x - CM7.1 RC1 2.3.4
www.CincyAdmins.com
www.MiiWiiChat.com
player911 said:
832 running stock CM7 @ 190 density. No custom kernels.
My score was on par with what it said Sensations were. I've heard CM7 benchmarks are usually lower compared to straight stock roms.
This also seems to heavily rely on browser technology. I wonder if the SGS2 marks higher with its acceleration?
LG G2x - CM7.1 RC1 2.3.4
www.CincyAdmins.com
www.MiiWiiChat.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, the hardware accelerated browser definitely helps. Whether anyone likes Samsung or not, they are proving to be the biggest innovator in Android today. Not to mention, since the Hummingbird was introduced, they have always had some of the best processors.
By the way, as I said in my previous post on here, the best I got on the stock Rom was 775.
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA Premium App
Hmm. I think this benchmark has major issues. Under system info it claims the second cpu has zero as its speed but reads the first one correctly. I will try it out again after they fix dual core support.
Edit... looking a little closer explains the scores. It is a biased hack test produced by a rival chip maker.
jcbofkc said:
Hmm. I think this benchmark has major issues. Under system info it claims the second cpu has zero as its speed but reads the first one correctly. I will try it out again after they fix dual core support.
Edit... looking a little closer explains the scores. It is a biased hack test produced by a rival chip maker.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummmm, duh? You didn't know who created the beanchmark until now? If its so biased then why does its rivals top the list? Samsung products.
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA Premium App
jcbofkc said:
Edit... looking a little closer explains the scores. It is a biased hack test produced by a rival chip maker.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol good one. He's got jokes. After digging into the innards of this Qualcomm app, I discovered it is made by Qualcomm. They are working in collusion with Samsung to make Nvidia look like ****. Enemy of my enemy, and all that...
Sent from my LG G2x
Tegra 2 has no NEON support.
jrwingate6 said:
Ummmm, duh? You didn't know who created the beanchmark until now? If its so biased then why does its rivals top the list? Samsung products.
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Calm down everyone. It would not be the first time there was a bias in a benchmark. I played with it for three seconds, noticed it does not even recognize the second nvidia chip properly and said something about it. Now did Qualcomm just make a crappy benchmark or did they do it on purpose?
Why does it show zero for the speed of the second chip? That's all I wanted to know. Apparently you do not have the answer.
Rooted stock rom on my first run.
is it flawed? or i just have a magic tegra2
cm7 74 faux oc/uv kernal
jcbofkc said:
Calm down everyone. It would not be the first time there was a bias in a benchmark. I played with it for three seconds, noticed it does not even recognize the second nvidia chip properly and said something about it. Now did Qualcomm just make a crappy benchmark or did they do it on purpose?
Why does it show zero for the speed of the second chip? That's all I wanted to know. Apparently you do not have the answer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course it's a flawed test. Scores are all over the place. By the way...Don't act like this is the only flawed test out there. There pretty much all flawed right now since most of them don't know how to use the Sensations processor correctly. It's the only CPU that throttles down to a single core and most of the benchmarks are only using one of it's cores.
So guys,I might have a chance to exchange my Desire HD for a Sensation(Plus some money of course),but I want to be sure before I set my eyes on the Sensation only.
To help me choose,could someone do some benchmarks for me?By benchmarks,I don't want stuff with stock rom or stock CPU speeds,but I mean some heavy benchmarking with full dual-core support(Mike's way or anyone else's),full CPU overclock(nothing less than 1.7GHz-Not even 2GHz would damage anyone's phone during ONE benchmark),GPU overclock(I read it's been done in some kernels-Wasn't possible on older Snapdragons) and generally everything that boosts performance.That would be my daily setup(Yes,I'm that mad ) and,also owning a Galaxy S 2,I won't be easily surprised.
So,the benchmarks I'd like to see are:
-Linpack's multi-thread test
-Nenamark 1 }I'd prefer Nenamark 2 but anyway.
-Nenamark 2 }
-CFBench
-Smartbench 2011
-Antutu benchmark
-Quadrant benchmark
If you could post your setup(Rom,CPU speed,GPU speed etc),I'd be deeply grateful too.
Many thanks in advance,I hope I'll be joining you soon.
Well I get 2500 normally on default CPU and GPU on android revolution hd .
Quaderent
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda premium
Just one thing: current overclock only works for one core. So what you'll see won't be the actual performance
¤Violets are red,
Roses are blue,
Wait, what?
I have no idea what I'm saying,
But you lost the game¤
austendale9 said:
Well I get 2500 normally on default CPU and GPU on android revolution hd .
Quaderent
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well,I clearly stated I do not care about stock settings that much but thanks for replying anyway.
idavid_ said:
Just one thing: current overclock only works for one core. So what you'll see won't be the actual performance
¤Violets are red,
Roses are blue,
Wait, what?
I have no idea what I'm saying,
But you lost the game¤
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes,I read about that,but I care more about graphics this time,as that was what disappointed me with my past HTC devices and made me switch to Samsung.Qualcomm's CPUs were always really good,no doubt about that so I don't exactly care about that.Synthetic benchmarks also don't mean ****,that's why specific benchmarks like Nenamark for GPU and Linpack for CPU are higher in my priority list.Also,in Smartbench,I care more about the gaming index score.
Thanks for pointing it out anyway.
Here are some benchmarks using Faux's 0.1.0 kernel at 1.7 min/Max and melvins beast rom.
Sent from my Sensation 4G
skyhigh2004 said:
Here are some benchmarks using Faux's 0.1.0 kernel at 1.7 min/Max and melvins beast rom.
Sent from my Sensation 4G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice.. I need to do that
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda premium
skyhigh2004 said:
Here are some benchmarks using Faux's 0.1.0 kernel at 1.7 min/Max and melvins beast rom.
Sent from my Sensation 4G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
180ish Linpack?Holy shiznit.That makes me wanna see both cores enabled.
Also holy shiznit because I forgot to mention CFBench.Thanks for that too skyhigh2004!
austendale9 said:
Nice.. I need to do that
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes my friend,you do.These phones(Sensation,Galaxy S 2) are very far from their true potential at stock.You should see my Galaxy S 2 stock vs my Galaxy S 2 running VillainRom and Ninphetamine kernel @1.6GHz.Night and day.And,unlike HTC,Samsung does a good job at not crippling their phones too much.
tolis626 said:
180ish Linpack?Holy shiznit.That makes me wanna see both cores enabled.
Also holy shiznit because I forgot to mention CFBench.Thanks for that too skyhigh2004!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah that linpack was crazy high lol, ranked 173 overall lol.
Sent from my Sensation 4G
I know quadrant score doesnt matter at all, but which ROM/kernel gives you the highest quadrant score?
Which version of quadrant gives the highest score to the sensation? or should i just photoshop a quadrant result?
tsekh501 said:
Which version of quadrant gives the highest score to the sensation? or should i just photoshop a quadrant result?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this.
10char
Could always tweak certian settings to get some stupidly high score.......
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using XDA App
So far I have found, MIUI to be the highest, but for sense , Virtuous is in the 2400's
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda premium
My highest was with Hypersensation.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda premium
This was the highest i've ever managed, CM7 Alpha 10. Everything maxed out on Faux kernel (whatever version it was then). HyperSensation gives me almost as high scores with the Bricked kernel.
I know it's Quadrant isn't the best, but there's just something about seeing those high scores! Lol.
MY QUADRANT SCORE WAS LYK 7000 ONCE. IT MATTER SO HARD.
I don't wanna be a douche, but Quadrant is totally irrelevant. I've seen phones with low scores smoother and faster than phones with high scores. It's total bogus, and outdated bogus at that.
mattbutsko said:
MY QUADRANT SCORE WAS LYK 7000 ONCE. IT MATTER SO HARD.
I don't wanna be a douche, but Quadrant is totally irrelevant. I've seen phones with low scores smoother and faster than phones with high scores. It's total bogus, and outdated bogus at that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My cm7 does browsermark scores for 101.000 BEATING IPAD 2/IPHONE4S KABOOM
(not a joke btw)
ics will be 120K+++~+~+~+~
My Skyrocket gets way higher quadrant scores than a friend of mine's OGS2.
3500vs3100
Yet... On every visual test he gets 20fps MORE than I do? Why is his score lower? the phone feels faster than mine.
Thoughts?
Overall I found the OGS2 to be smoother with the animations, etc.
Graphic tests (2D and 3D) are only some parts from the overall Quadrant test (CPU, Memory, I/O, Graphic). If you're using Quadrant Advanced, you could see scores from each test performed.
What if you try other benchmark app such as Antutu ? You'll get more detailed result.
---------------------------------
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Mini GT-S5570 via xda-dev app
CyanogenMod 7.2.0-RC3-KANG by squadzone
Most probably...
I was shocked to see the results. but in "3d" test, the S2 simply blew the SR out of the water.
And the OS itself seemed more fluid than the skyrocket.
I got 4000 on quadrant with stock Rom.....
Take that OGS2!
both phones are fast in there own way.
but let the pissing contest continue, as you were.
They have different processors or chip sets. (one or both of them. I forget.)
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Was that the score from just one part of the test? I ran a couple.. the total score was a little over 6000 for each?
I had read that these scores don't mean that much?? But, hey I'm new to Android..
Sent from my SGH-I727R using XDA App
shaggyskunk said:
Was that the score from just one part of the test? I ran a couple.. the total score was a little over 6000 for each?
I had read that these scores don't mean that much?? But, hey I'm new to Android..
Sent from my SGH-I727R using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its just a way to measure your e-peen. Antutu is much better.
Sent from my SGH-I727 using xda premium
Strange Observation
Today I received my replacement SR from Amazon and I ran few Quadrant tests and was constantly getting 3000+ score, with highest being 3360. Without installing anything else I just rooted the phone with Easy Root and then re-ran Quadrant test few times and did not get 3000+ score even once. The best I got was 2500. All other scores were between 2200 - 2300.
Any idea why rooting the phone can cause this drop? I also noticed that after rooting, the phone does not feel as snappy as stock.
ajamils said:
Today I received my replacement SR from Amazon and I ran few Quadrant tests and was constantly getting 3000+ score, with highest being 3360. Without installing anything else I just rooted the phone with Easy Root and then re-ran Quadrant test few times and did not get 3000+ score even once. The best I got was 2500. All other scores were between 2200 - 2300.
Any idea why rooting the phone can cause this drop? I also noticed that after rooting, the phone does not feel as snappy as stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not the root.. Quadrant tests are pointless and the more you run them the less they get.. they are very erratic...
Antu or Cf Bench are much more accurate and true to form.
Longcat14 said:
Its just a way to measure your e-peen. Antutu is much better.
Sent from my SGH-I727 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been using Antutu, just not really sure what to make of the numbers?
Sent from my SGH-I727R using XDA App
GalaxySkyrocket500 said:
Its not the root.. Quadrant tests are pointless and the more you run them the less they get.. they are very erratic...
Antu or Cf Bench are much more accurate and true to form.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Antutu or CF might be more accurate but since I use one tool to compare the different ROMS / Phones..... that shouldn't matter.
ajamils said:
Antutu or CF might be more accurate but since I use one tool to compare the different ROMS / Phones..... that shouldn't matter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is UNTRUE if quadrant its self is not accurate it will only make ur Baseline for tests just as in accurate and false.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Exactly. If you run 10 tests and get 10 greatly varying results then something is wrong haha.
I have this argument with people all the time on quadrant and sleedtest.net (xtremelabs speed test is more consistent)
the2rrell said:
This is UNTRUE if quadrant its self is not accurate it will only make ur Baseline for tests just as in accurate and false.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA App
The problem with quadrant is as if it somehow doesn't scale the processor to full speed. For me it has always been consistent...