I know quadrant score doesnt matter at all, but which ROM/kernel gives you the highest quadrant score?
Which version of quadrant gives the highest score to the sensation? or should i just photoshop a quadrant result?
tsekh501 said:
Which version of quadrant gives the highest score to the sensation? or should i just photoshop a quadrant result?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this.
10char
Could always tweak certian settings to get some stupidly high score.......
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using XDA App
So far I have found, MIUI to be the highest, but for sense , Virtuous is in the 2400's
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda premium
My highest was with Hypersensation.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda premium
This was the highest i've ever managed, CM7 Alpha 10. Everything maxed out on Faux kernel (whatever version it was then). HyperSensation gives me almost as high scores with the Bricked kernel.
I know it's Quadrant isn't the best, but there's just something about seeing those high scores! Lol.
MY QUADRANT SCORE WAS LYK 7000 ONCE. IT MATTER SO HARD.
I don't wanna be a douche, but Quadrant is totally irrelevant. I've seen phones with low scores smoother and faster than phones with high scores. It's total bogus, and outdated bogus at that.
mattbutsko said:
MY QUADRANT SCORE WAS LYK 7000 ONCE. IT MATTER SO HARD.
I don't wanna be a douche, but Quadrant is totally irrelevant. I've seen phones with low scores smoother and faster than phones with high scores. It's total bogus, and outdated bogus at that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My cm7 does browsermark scores for 101.000 BEATING IPAD 2/IPHONE4S KABOOM
(not a joke btw)
ics will be 120K+++~+~+~+~
Related
When you run quadrant (I'm aware its inaccurate, I'm just curious) why is the CPU section of the nexus one (2.2) and the evo so large compared to ours even with OC?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Over 1500 with Paragon. Kernel 100Hz 1200MHz OC sans UV!
sixstringsg said:
When you run quadrant (I'm aware its inaccurate, I'm just curious) why is the CPU section of the nexus one (2.2) and the evo so large compared to ours even with OC?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Snapdragon is better at math-heavy operations than the Hummingbird. This is what the CPU portion of Quadrant is testing. This is also why the Snapdragon gets about 2.5-3x the score in Linpack.
I have recently purchased my g2x and even though it seems fast it post really bad quadrant scores on all of the different quadrant test. On the benchmark test it was up to 2400 no can't get past 1300. Does this mean one of the processors went out.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
zackyzack said:
I have recently purchased my g2x and even though it seems fast it post really bad quadrant scores on all of the different quadrant test. On the benchmark test it was up to 2400 no can't get past 1300. Does this mean one of the processors went out.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. But how do you check that?
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App
Quadrant Standard sucks for benchmarks. It is inconsistent and gives odd scores, like the time I scored 24000 with my ZIO.... yeah right, this phone is lucky to hit 1080 with our new overclocked kernel
Use AnTutu Benchmark and you should get more consistent scores.
Sent from my Zio using XDA Premium App
Mattix724 said:
Quadrant Standard sucks for benchmarks. It is inconsistent and gives odd scores, like the time I scored 24000 with my ZIO.... yeah right, this phone is lucky to hit 1080 with our new overclocked kernel
Use AnTutu Benchmark and you should get more consistent scores.
Sent from my Zio using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I get constant 2400 scores. Froyo stock.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA Premium App
zackyzack said:
I have recently purchased my g2x and even though it seems fast it post really bad quadrant scores on all of the different quadrant test. On the benchmark test it was up to 2400 no can't get past 1300. Does this mean one of the processors went out.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does the phone feel laggy during normal use? If not I wouldn't wory too much about quadrant scores. Try running a Linpack benchmark. Your score should be in the low 30's.
No it feels like its running great just really low scores all around. Im getting about 18 on linpqck
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Yeah i'm experiencing the same thing can't even get past 2000 and when i check quadrant about phone option it says i have one core pretty sure no one screwed up my phone when they shipped it... T__T
I think peoples experiences with Quadrant seem to vary a great deal. I tend to get pretty consistent results from it.
My Skyrocket gets way higher quadrant scores than a friend of mine's OGS2.
3500vs3100
Yet... On every visual test he gets 20fps MORE than I do? Why is his score lower? the phone feels faster than mine.
Thoughts?
Overall I found the OGS2 to be smoother with the animations, etc.
Graphic tests (2D and 3D) are only some parts from the overall Quadrant test (CPU, Memory, I/O, Graphic). If you're using Quadrant Advanced, you could see scores from each test performed.
What if you try other benchmark app such as Antutu ? You'll get more detailed result.
---------------------------------
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Mini GT-S5570 via xda-dev app
CyanogenMod 7.2.0-RC3-KANG by squadzone
Most probably...
I was shocked to see the results. but in "3d" test, the S2 simply blew the SR out of the water.
And the OS itself seemed more fluid than the skyrocket.
I got 4000 on quadrant with stock Rom.....
Take that OGS2!
both phones are fast in there own way.
but let the pissing contest continue, as you were.
They have different processors or chip sets. (one or both of them. I forget.)
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Was that the score from just one part of the test? I ran a couple.. the total score was a little over 6000 for each?
I had read that these scores don't mean that much?? But, hey I'm new to Android..
Sent from my SGH-I727R using XDA App
shaggyskunk said:
Was that the score from just one part of the test? I ran a couple.. the total score was a little over 6000 for each?
I had read that these scores don't mean that much?? But, hey I'm new to Android..
Sent from my SGH-I727R using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its just a way to measure your e-peen. Antutu is much better.
Sent from my SGH-I727 using xda premium
Strange Observation
Today I received my replacement SR from Amazon and I ran few Quadrant tests and was constantly getting 3000+ score, with highest being 3360. Without installing anything else I just rooted the phone with Easy Root and then re-ran Quadrant test few times and did not get 3000+ score even once. The best I got was 2500. All other scores were between 2200 - 2300.
Any idea why rooting the phone can cause this drop? I also noticed that after rooting, the phone does not feel as snappy as stock.
ajamils said:
Today I received my replacement SR from Amazon and I ran few Quadrant tests and was constantly getting 3000+ score, with highest being 3360. Without installing anything else I just rooted the phone with Easy Root and then re-ran Quadrant test few times and did not get 3000+ score even once. The best I got was 2500. All other scores were between 2200 - 2300.
Any idea why rooting the phone can cause this drop? I also noticed that after rooting, the phone does not feel as snappy as stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not the root.. Quadrant tests are pointless and the more you run them the less they get.. they are very erratic...
Antu or Cf Bench are much more accurate and true to form.
Longcat14 said:
Its just a way to measure your e-peen. Antutu is much better.
Sent from my SGH-I727 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been using Antutu, just not really sure what to make of the numbers?
Sent from my SGH-I727R using XDA App
GalaxySkyrocket500 said:
Its not the root.. Quadrant tests are pointless and the more you run them the less they get.. they are very erratic...
Antu or Cf Bench are much more accurate and true to form.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Antutu or CF might be more accurate but since I use one tool to compare the different ROMS / Phones..... that shouldn't matter.
ajamils said:
Antutu or CF might be more accurate but since I use one tool to compare the different ROMS / Phones..... that shouldn't matter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is UNTRUE if quadrant its self is not accurate it will only make ur Baseline for tests just as in accurate and false.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Exactly. If you run 10 tests and get 10 greatly varying results then something is wrong haha.
I have this argument with people all the time on quadrant and sleedtest.net (xtremelabs speed test is more consistent)
the2rrell said:
This is UNTRUE if quadrant its self is not accurate it will only make ur Baseline for tests just as in accurate and false.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using XDA App
The problem with quadrant is as if it somehow doesn't scale the processor to full speed. For me it has always been consistent...
This phone is very fast. Check out the score from quadrant, linpack, etc. It beats the HTC One X in scores. The highest score of 5189 in quadrant. 199.097 in 0.85 seconds multi-thread on linpack. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zh5quKyypw8&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
Please fell free to post any amazing scores you got.
Sent from my HTC One S using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
Yesterday Quadrant gave me on the 3th run a score of 5450. But I never get that score again lol, now it's allways around 5000-5100. Antutu is around 7000-7100.
Most times I have tested quadrant is about 4985ish
sent with HTC1S
So I just updated from 1.73 to 1.85... And my quadrant scores are like 600 less, at 4400 compared to ~4970 on 1.73.. already factory reset, disabled a bunch of apps, etc. Not really sure what the deal is, anybody else experience this?
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
Is your phone noticeably slower? No? Then who cares...?
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Homescreen feels a little sluggish..
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
Did it feel that way before you saw the quadrant score?
Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
Haha I don't know.. it could be my mind telling me that it is, but the score that took the biggest hit is CPU, significantly lower than what quadrant says my device should be. I/o, 2d, and 3d graphics are slightly lower while memory is much higher..
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
rfree2340 said:
Haha I don't know.. it could be my mind telling me that it is, but the score that took the biggest hit is CPU, significantly lower than what quadrant says my device should be. I/o, 2d, and 3d graphics are slightly lower while memory is much higher..
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its been said that quadrant doesnt relate to real world performance very well. for example i lost 50% after update on quadrant back with the evo and the phone actually felt faster. Run quadrant if you want but just dont put a lot of faith in the score vs your user experience. What is important is how it feels to YOU, not quadrant. Most all of the early reports say 1.85 feels a good bit faster than the others..
Yeah, I do realize that, but I also want to compare scores with others who updated to 1.85 because if everyone else is getting better scores still then maybe there's something wrong with my device, though I bet that is highly unlikely as it is just software.
Sent from my HTC One X using XDA
I can concur with the OP. I had scores of 5200, when I updated, they went down to about 4600. Doesn't make a difference as the phone is a little smoother now.
happened to me too. pisses me off!
I had scores anywhere from 4700-5150 now I can't get any higher than 4500 after the update.