From today Rogers is offering Samsung Spica for $79.99 (with 3 yrs contract). The X10 is suppose to come end of this month, but I am pretty sure X10 will be expensive. Me and some other peoples I know are confused which phone to buy (when X10 comes out). Spica seems very cheap, X10 will be expensive for its HiRes camera and 65K screen. If we compare them then the difference comes out to
Spica
800Mhz Processor, 320 x 480 pixels, 3.2 inches, 3.15 MP Android 1.5
X10
1 GB storage, 384 MB RAM, 480 x 854 pixels, 4.0 inches 8 MP Android 1.6
They are both stuck with 1.5/1.6 Android, and 800Mhz is almost same as 1Ghz (or am I wrong).
Pros for X10: 4" screen with great resolution and might get 2.0 Android (hopefully). 8MP camera with face detection and ect. Good looking shell.
Cons for X10: Who needs 8MP?? Will the Android 2.0 ever come (or just one of their fake promises to get customers)?? 4" is great but might be a bit bigger to fit in pocket (and wrong girls might get wrong impression lol).
Pros for Spics: It is CHEAP. It can play DIVX, has an additional microphone.
Cons for Spica: Camera is not that important but at least a flash is quite important. Button don't have backlight. The screen is only 3.1"
Should we just giveup on these two phones and get a Milestone instead? (everything is grt with milestone except 600Mhz processor)
What do you guys think is a better option?
don't get motorola milestone it's locked down, so you can't mess around with it. I'm also thinking of getting samsung spica...
htc fan89 said:
don't get motorola milestone it's locked down, so you can't mess around with it. I'm also thinking of getting samsung spica...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Locked down" what do you mean? If I get milestone it comes from expansys and it would unlocked? Or does Locked in Android phones means something else?
motorola locked down the kernel so you can't modify it.
What the **ck man I thought in Android everything is open source!!! What about Spica? or X10?
Well it has been a while since I wrote in this thread. It seems like there are ROMs for spica, not yet for x10 but they are working on it.
The key diferrences that i found for Canadian consumers are:
spica has divx player with 3.2 amoled display of 320 x 480 res and the best part is that the phone is ONLY 29.99 (with 3yrs contr) and is soon going to get 2.1.
X10 has 4" TFT screen of 480 x 800 res and will get 2.0 someday hopefully.
Does anybody knows if spica has multitouch or not? (x10 does not)
The Spica's screen is afaik not an AMOLED but casual LCD.
Related
I can you tell me your opinion between the Samsung I5700 Galaxy Spica and the Sony Ericsson Xperia X10Mini.
I'm thinking in buy one of these two smartphones and I really want to know your opinion about it.
Thanks!
Comparation
i think u try samsung galaxy s because many video format like flv mkv divx wmv etc u play with built video player 2 its also updated froyo 2.2 in next months better screen front video camera etc spica is good phone but it never updated froyo and it play only divx format for battery both phones are best i use spica but now i think go for samsung galaxy s i think that for rooted u may go this site samdriod.net
Well, I too am looking at the Spica as my next phone.
Between those two I would say spica. Why? Well because of the screen size : 320 x 480 pixels, 3.2 inches, offering more compatibility with apps than the 240 x 320 pixels, 2.55 inches of the mini (that limitation can be removed via a hack or two but some problems still remain, from what i`ve read)
Spica has a larger screen and battery size, but lacks the 5mpx camera and the the proximity sensor and FM radio. (both are really optional, you can live without them.)
And don`t forget Spica`s 800 mhz processor (overclocking is possible, from what i`ve read on samdroid) versus the 600 mhz of the mini.
My word: go for the Spica!
I`m saving some money in order to get one for me, too!
Alex_GP said:
Well, I too am looking at the Spica as my next phone.
Between those two I would say spica. Why? Well because of the screen size : 320 x 480 pixels, 3.2 inches, offering more compatibility with apps than the 240 x 320 pixels, 2.55 inches of the mini (that limitation can be removed via a hack or two but some problems still remain, from what i`ve read)
Spica has a larger screen and battery size, but lacks the 5mpx camera and the the proximity sensor and FM radio. (both are really optional, you can live without them.)
And don`t forget Spica`s 800 mhz processor (overclocking is possible, from what i`ve read on samdroid) versus the 600 mhz of the mini.
My word: go for the Spica!
I`m saving some money in order to get one for me, too!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the spica isnt fast even if it runs on 800 mhz. had one before my nexus running 2.1. fm radio? didnt know it had one... i dont think it does. also... it doesnt have multitouch. the camera also sucks even if its 5mp. its a cheap phone though.
just saying.... you might be disappointed.
id rather get the legend if its a mid range android.
I have a Galaxy Spica and am very happy with it. It is a very good phone for it's price imho.
The screen is good, batterylife is good, 3D performance is bad due to no drivers (fix is in the making), there is an FM-tuner but it's disabled (no hack yet), there is extra RAM that is disabled (no hack yet), the screen supports multitouch, but it's disabled (no hack yet either) so it has alot of potential.
Also, there is a nice community for custom roms and hacks, they are making a FroYo build and already compiled the DVM libs to Eclair so we have the Froyo performance :-D (~9MFLOPS)
I'd go for the Spica ;-)
Any opinions about the Sony Ericsson Xperia X10mini?
Hello guys. And yes, i have tried the search, but idk why didnt get any answers ,tho im pretty sure there might be similar threads.
So i am planning to get a new phone, and since my friend informed me of android i instantly became a fan.
I would like to buy a low end - mid range android phone, but not sure which one. so far optimus one looks the best, but not flawless. I looked at samsungs but they are just ... err cant find the right word.... not for me, so to speak. and them darn htc's are way over priced... theyre becoming the second apple where you pay only for the name ,i like the htc legend, but its almost the same or even worse than optimus one in some specs (tho looks way cooler) and costs almost twice as much (in my country).
so.. i am kinda lost. maybe i should wait for some gingerbread updates and see if they fix optimus ones probs and then just get it.
ty for any feedback.
What carrier are you on?
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
xilw3r said:
i like the htc legend, but its almost the same or even worse than optimus one in some specs (tho looks way cooler)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are joking...
Legend
Capacitive display (more responsive, multitouch support)
5mp camera w/ flash
unibody construction
384mb RAM
HTC Sense
Optimus
Resistive display (less responsive, no multitouch support)
3.1mp camera, no flash
Plastic body
256mb RAM
Stock android
They both have the same armv6 cpu at 600mhz, but you'll get smoother browsing on the Legend due to htc's modified browser.
Not saying you should get either, just saying, the Legend is does not have lower specs than the Optimus.
AdrianK said:
You are joking...
Legend
Capacitive display (more responsive, multitouch support)
5mp camera w/ flash
unibody construction
384mb RAM
HTC Sense
Optimus
Resistive display (less responsive, no multitouch support)
3.1mp camera, no flash
Plastic body
256mb RAM
Stock android
They both have the same armv6 cpu at 600mhz, but you'll get smoother browsing on the Legend due to htc's modified browser.
Not saying you should get either, just saying, the Legend is does not have lower specs than the Optimus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont mean to be rude, but you sir are mixing lg optimus gt540 with optimus one also known as p500. which has exatcly the same size and pixel display as the legend, 512 ram and 2.2 android out of the box, yes it has a 3 mpix camera without flash, but that is something i dont care about. the design is plastic, some rubbery feeling, and metal strip around. really like it, feels like my old w880
edit: the carrier has no impact in my country, we dont have T mobile, orange, and so on (as in, not the same deals as u might have)
xilw3r said:
dont mean to be rude, but you sir are mixing lg optimus gt540 with optimus one also known as p500. which has exatcly the same size and pixel display as the legend, 512 ram and 2.2 android out of the box, yes it has a 3 mpix camera without flash, but that is something i dont care about. the design is plastic, some rubbery feeling, and metal strip around. really like it, feels like my old w880
edit: the carrier has no impact in my country, we dont have T mobile, orange, and so on (as in, not the same deals as u might have)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eeek >.< My bad indeed, sorry
I would wait a bit and get an HTC device
HTC evo with root
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
orb3000 said:
I would wait a bit and get an HTC device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why so, if i may ask ?
P.S.
@bwg ,htc evo was pretty high end the last time i checked :>
im using optimus one and regret to buy
Holy bumping old topics, batman!
HTC Rezound
8 MP auto focus, f/2.2, 28mm wide angle lens, 2 x LED flash; 2 MP front–facing camera, 1080p camcorder
Network
LTE 700 MHz (band 13); CDMA 1x/3G 800/1900 MHz
Dimensions
Size: 5.08” x 2.58” x .54”
Weight: 6oz
Operating System
Android Gingerbread
Display
4.3” super LCD screen, 720 x 1280, HD 720p
Keyboard
Virtual QWERTY
Battery
Rechargeable lithium–ion battery 1620 mAh
SAR: 1.25 W/kg @ 1g (HEAD)
1.12 W/kg @ 1g (BODY)
Usage: 404 minutes (typical)
Standby: 261 hours (typical)
Memory / Processor
Dual core 1.5GHz processor & 1GB DDR2 RAM
16GB internal memory (actual formatted capacity is less)
16GB microSD card pre–installed
Nice phone if you are looking for HTC
okay, i'm going to be straight up honest, in my opinion, lg has a horrible skin over android that makes the os sluggish and ugly. they however make really good harware. that's why i liked the g2x because it was stock android. honestly, if you're a first time android, i recommend the nexus line because that's how google really envisioned it to be like and you'll get the best experience with it. the nexus s is quite lovely. if you want the newest tech, then save up for the galaxy nexus. it's really expensive
LG... maybe not
Maybe totally off-topic
My father has an LG optimus one, and you know what? it's great. It's such a cool phone, but....
By the time my father bought his phone, I bought a samsung galaxy S2. I know, i know, it's more expensive that your two options, but you gotta think that the new galaxy SIII is just around the corner and so, the prices of the S2 are dropping.
I don't know if you can stretch your budget a liitle bit (maybe a lot) but I can assure you, the galaxy s2 for the first time android user is a life changer. Trust me, this is my first smartphone ever, and my last phone not even had a radio, a very loyal phone, but this is another world. Think about it, and good luck.
my first android is HTC desire
Android
My very first android phone : HTC SENSATION XL.
Awhyeah
F4LLCON
Evo 3d is getting android 4 if care about 3d
My first android phone was samsung galaxy ace.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda premium
Why would you even think not investing money into a higher end phone.
First off it'll last you longer.
Second you'll have a lot more support from devs and fans.
Id never buy a cheap phone, so I suggest one of the galaxy s 2s or HTC Rezound, Vivid, or wait for the galaxy s 3/one x.
Sent from my Skyrocket, ICSMOD5
I would buy a dual core phone as the first, like the HTC Sensation or a Samsung Galaxy SII.
Sent from my X10i using XDA
Hi.. My first Android was an Huawei u8650.. While now I've an LG optimus one.. And it's great!
Inviato dal mio LG-P500 usando Tapatalk
Tired out waiting for dual cores to come out for WP7...and I have been waiting to get a new phone for several months now.
So I was kind of curious, the HD7S is $150 more than the Focus. Besides a slightly larger screen, are there any other differences between these two, or are you just paying more for the HTC brand name?
Booyaah82 said:
Tired out waiting for dual cores to come out for WP7...and I have been waiting to get a new phone for several months now.
So I was kind of curious, the HD7S is $150 more than the Focus. Besides a slightly larger screen, are there any other differences between these two, or are you just paying more for the HTC brand name?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Code:
[U]HD7S[/U] [U]Focus[/U]
SLCD Super AMOLED
16 GB 8 GB (expandable)
4.8 x 2.68 x 0.44 inches 4.84 x 2.56 x 0.39 inches
Seems to be the primary differences. Lots of sites out there you can look for to compare devices. -_-'
Booyaah82 said:
Tired out waiting for dual cores to come out for WP7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just curious -- why do you want that? What benefit will you realize from having 2 cores?
i think focus don't have cost performance
hd7 is gelivable
I got a focus and the super amoled screen its just beutiful, the performance of it it just amazing, i dont know about the hd7 but the focus is the way to go, and its thiner and lighter, great camara
mizad09 said:
I got a focus and the super amoled screen its just beutiful, the performance of it it just amazing, i dont know about the hd7 but the focus is the way to go, and its thiner and lighter, great camara
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
remember focus is smaller than hd7s,although it doesn't have a S amoled.
Booyaah82 said:
Tired out waiting for dual cores to come out for WP7...and I have been waiting to get a new phone for several months now.
So I was kind of curious, the HD7S is $150 more than the Focus. Besides a slightly larger screen, are there any other differences between these two, or are you just paying more for the HTC brand name?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HTC name and it's newer.
I saw the HD7S for $49 briefly @ att.com now it's back to $149. Still the Focus is the better phone still due to 4" super amoled screen and larger battery (1550 mah). If you want to play around with microsd cards it's also capable of more storage and has faster built in nand memory than the HTC devices.
Sept 1 mango press blackout life should reveal more devices, i expect the HD7S to come down in price regardless. The only reason to get the HD7S imho would be if the 4.3" screen is necessary visually or for typing.
Ah I forgot some new phones will come out with the Mango official release. I guess I'll just wait a few more weeks to get a better selection or lower price.
Probably old news but this looks hot (if it somehow makes it past concept):
In short, these are main specifications of Nokia W10:
Main display
Touchscreen 4.5 inch (1280 x 720 pixels)
Processor
2 GHz Quad-Core (2 GB RAM and GPU)
Memory
32GB Internal (External up to 64 GB microSD)
Connectivity
Quad-4G LTE frequency bands
Battery
Li-Ion 2000 mAh
Camera
15 MP rear and 5 MP front
(Carl Zeiss optics and Dual Xenon flash)
TV-out
1080p video
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http ://www .mobilenewsbreak.com/2011/07/nokia-w10-quad-core-smartphone-with-wp7.html
Booyaah82 said:
Ah I forgot some new phones will come out with the Mango official release. I guess I'll just wait a few more weeks to get a better selection or lower price.
Probably old news but this looks hot (if it somehow makes it past concept):
http ://www .mobilenewsbreak.com/2011/07/nokia-w10-quad-core-smartphone-with-wp7.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's only a concept, I wouldn't expect the Quad Cores for another yr or so. Plus, WP7 only supports 480x800 Resolution @ 262 DPI. Mango didn't change this. If anything, that'd be a WP8 Concept IMO.
It's too early to have that kind of phone, I believe next 2 years than its going to be built.
I need to replace ma aged Milestone (OG Droid) and basically this two are the only choice I have (contract, gift etc)
I like the IP67 cert. on the GO and love the idea of dual core cpu, however I am worried about the screen res HVGA on 3.5", will I go blind from the pixel size? 165 ppi
I like the screen size on One V, the ICS and the unibody, but I am worried that it won't be much of an upgrade from my old phone (running at 1 Ghz on CM7). I was looking at some quadrant benchmarks and while it is faster, its not by much. However the 512mb ram would be a huge upgrade to me (milestone locked BL, no swap apps shutdown).
As far as I can tell, they both have decent 5mp cameras and shoot nice 720p videos.
Need advice.
CeBits said:
I need to replace ma aged Milestone (OG Droid) and basically this two are the only choice I have (contract, gift etc)
I like the IP67 cert. on the GO and love the idea of dual core cpu, however I am worried about the screen res HVGA on 3.5", will I go blind from the pixel size? 165 ppi
I like the screen size on One V, the ICS and the unibody, but I am worried that it won't be much of an upgrade from my old phone (running at 1 Ghz on CM7). I was looking at some quadrant benchmarks and while it is faster, its not by much. However the 512mb ram would be a huge upgrade to me (milestone locked BL, no swap apps shutdown).
As far as I can tell, they both have decent 5mp cameras and shoot nice 720p videos.
Need advice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi i give u a cross tabulation table wish this will be helpful for u
Dual Core CPU
-----------------------------------
Sony Xperia Go Dual Core
HTC One V (Primo)Single Core
More cores result in better parallelism, meaning more tasks can be processed in parallel without slowing down the User Interface.
More Storage Capacity
-------------------------------------
Sony Xperia Go 8 GB
HTC One V (Primo) 3.90625 GB
Around 104% more inbuilt memory than HTC One V (Primo). More memory allows you to store more songs, videos, photos and install more applications.
Supports DLNA
----------------------------
Sony Xperia Go yes
HTC One V (Primo) no
DLNA standard enables easy sharing of music, photos, and videos over wifi. You can stream video from your DLNA phone to your DLNA TV via WiFi.
Screen
------------------------
Sony Xperia Go 3.5 inches
HTC One V (Primo) 3.7 inches
Around 5% bigger screen than Sony Xperia Go. Reading, browsing internet and watching movies is more pleasing experience on a bigger screen
Slimmer
-------------------------
Sony Xperia Go 9.8 mm
HTC One V (Primo) 9.19 mm
Around 6% slimmer than Sony Xperia Go. Slimmer mobiles are easier to carry in pocket and look more fashionable
t hink htc v
Please see the sticky at the top of this section for such questions.
Thread closed.
I have an LG Nitro HD. I like it fine, but I have been wanting another device to play around with. I will be getting a Samsung Galaxy S4 eventually, so I'd like my tinkering device to be something other than a large screen. I would love something that has a really small screen, but not a really crappy device.
Most things that I look at have had single core, 800 MHZ (or worse) CPU's. I think what I am going to end up with will be the Sony Ericson Xperia mini Pro. It has 1 GHZ Scorpion processor, 512 MB of RAM, and supports USB-OTG which is all pretty cool. http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_xperia_mini-3947.php
Does anyone have any experience with this phone? Does anyone know of a phone that is better or smaller? Also, does anyone know of any other cool, unique android devices?
I think u wont find any devices below 4' with decent enough hardware by today's standard. Either its big with full blown hardware or small but crappy and limited hardware. Yeah its sucks with current trend of bigger is better. Phone 4' and below is still much, much easier to handle with one hand than those humongous giants.
Sony Xperia U
1GHz dual-core processor, 5MP camera, 3.5″ Reality Display, 3D surround sound
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7FUGZiKIX8
LooieENG said:
Sony Xperia U
1GHz dual-core processor, 5MP camera, 3.5″ Reality Display, 3D surround sound
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7FUGZiKIX8
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Currently using xperia mini pro and its a nice little phone. no complaints so far.
---------- Post added at 03:00 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:48 AM ----------
i would strongly recommend the Xperia Mini Pro. U wont regret it.
Sorry to bump thread but it's #1 forum link for "best small phone" on google
I have a htc wildfire s on android 2.3.6, as it only has 512mb rom so it can't do 4.x
Really smooth, lasts 2 days / charge (with cheap ebay battery).Glass touchscreen. Rarely notice which pocket it's in...
Also worth mention, my Desire C.
Can handle 4.x, yet no open wifi driver, works, but kinda "hacky" when not on stock rom. cheap touchscreen made of plastic. Aldo really small, but a bit longer. Battery can last 3 days.
Both phones can be bought used for under 100$.
Still waiting, I'd be willing to pay 400$ on a 720p 3.5" with a dual 1ghz, 1gb ram, that lasts 2 days on a charge, in the wildfire's size !