Related
Hey everyone! I was wondering if anyone has tried the rhinoshield cases + screen / back protectors for the Note 9.
I have seen plenty of reviews praising both the solidsuit and crash guard, but not much about the frontal screen protector (the one they claim to be full adhesive). Any impressions on this one?
henriquehfc said:
Hey everyone! I was wondering if anyone has tried the rhinoshield cases + screen / back protectors for the Note 9.
I have seen plenty of reviews praising both the solidsuit and crash guard, but not much about the frontal screen protector (the one they claim to be full adhesive). Any impressions on this one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have ordered a back protector. will give u more info once I get it
I also want to know about the lenses that can be attached to the solidsuit if anyone knows
I am using the Solid suit currently and its been almost 2 weeks and so far so good.
I had the Spigen tough armour earlier which was little bulky so thought of using this one
My colleague has been using the solid suit for his galaxy s9+ and he has dropped it preety much everywhere and he is preety happy with the performance
I have ordered the Rhinoshield Wide+Macro lens + adapter so still waiting for the delivery
Once they arrive will share the experience
For the tempered glass with adhesive i have been using the Spigen one and i am preety much satisfied with it. Moreover it costs little less than the rhinoshield
I totally disliked the front screen protector. It doesn't have black edges but dot matrix ans the common horrible rainbow effects in the middle of the screen.
I would love to try some screen protectors, but my only concern is that I won't able to wash my phone. Ever since I had galaxy S8 plus, I have been washing the phone regularly (3 times a week) with lukewarm water and once twice a month with hand soap. Owned Note 8 and S9 plus, continued the same tradition and the phones were in better condition when I sold them used.
Using a nice glass shield might make me happy, but I am not sure having additional layer of glass would make me any happier. As we know smartphone manufacturers try every year to reduce the thickness of glass as much possible because it makes the phone more beautiful.
I used liquid nano crystal on S8 plus and that was the stupidest mistake. Even though the protection worked, that killed Samsung's dust resistance coating making it a fingerprint magnet. Just few minutes after a clean wash phone would look very oily, dusty and old. In the end phone fell out of my pocket and accidentally closed the car door, smashing the phone. Phone was bent in the center, Samsung said they won't repair due to possible motherboard damage. Lesson learnt - If the phone is destined to shatter, you won't be able to protect it
So it seems only Whitestone is fully compatible as screen protector for Galaxy s10.
Historically speaking some cases are not compatible with their protector as they tend to peel off depending on lip coverage.
For those who had purchased and already received their protector, please share your case experience with whitestone
I too wish to know this.
All I know so far is the official Samsung LED wallet case as well as the LED back cover both work. But I would like more options with better protection.
I have cases I can test, if I could actually get my hands on the whitestone
I have it on my UAG monarch no problems at all.
Anyone used Whitestone Dome with Spigen Tough Armor or Otterbox Pursuit/Commuter/Symmetry? Does it work?
EDIT: Confirmed Otterbox Pursuit works with Whitestone Dome as shown here. https://youtu.be/_CpGWK384mw?t=563
I purchased two cases spigen tough armor and vanguard series.
First I installed spigen case and it results in whitestone to lift from the side, so it wasn't compatible for me.
Then I removed whitestone and then tested with vanguard series and it seems to be working fine, no lifting of screen protector so far ( 12 hours)
Both times the installation of whitestone was perfect and waited 24 hours before putting the case on.
Below is the link to Vanguard series
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07MC73X5H/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o03_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
I have the ESR Yippee Touch Soft Case and can confirm that it works without any issues with the S10.
My Spigen Ultra Hybrid and Neo Hybrid for the S10+ do not cause the Whitestone to peel up., dosent even come close to touching. Had these same cases and Whitestone on the S8+ and the S9+ and the were compatible.
I HIGHLY recommend the Whitestone protectors. The adhesive makes them SUBSTANTIALLY more chip/crack resistant and the touch sensitivity is light years ahead of other protectors (like ZAGG). It was my go-to on Note and now S10+.
I am a minimalist and finally found a case that's thin but also adds SOME protection. TORRAS on Amazon. The hard plastic has a matte finish, amazing touch and feel but little protection. The silicone option is thin, has ridges to protect camera and screen but slides in pants and pockets easily. It DOES offer drop protection relatively.
jstodda said:
I HIGHLY recommend the Whitestone protectors. The adhesive makes them SUBSTANTIALLY more chip/crack resistant and the touch sensitivity is light years ahead of other protectors (like ZAGG). It was my go-to on Note and now S10+.
I am a minimalist and finally found a case that's thin but also adds SOME protection. TORRAS on Amazon. The hard plastic has a matte finish, amazing touch and feel but little protection. The silicone option is thin, has ridges to protect camera and screen but slides in pants and pockets easily. It DOES offer drop protection relatively.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whitestone dome glass doesn't work on my s10+ finger print scanner. By not working, I mean I have success rates of 50% or less.
I followed all the procedures to the installation (I've done this in the past with prior galaxy phones so have substantive experience). First I removed the pre-installed screen protector, followed instructions to a T and worked off a perfectly level table on the install. Allowed the glue to adhere using the UV light following the time required per instructions. I received both finger print reader and samsung software updates on the phone and increase touch sensitivity. I reregistered my right thumbprint 4x on the phone (4 versions of my right thumbprint filling up the finger print bank) I even went to lengths to moisturize my thumb to get a better read. But all of this didn't work on increasing the hit rate on the scans.
Further, I see they have updated their instructions on installation to now include a 1 min press down on the finger print sensor in between UV light curing. If this was what was needed, then I didn't do it and can't now since these were not instructions included in our purchase and my install was last week.
I would stay away from whitestone dome for now, there are many other reports of people with my experience.
The problem is for every person that posts that it is an issue there are several that post that it's not. There are so many variables but I have heard that overtime it does get better.
jstodda said:
The problem is for every person that posts that it is an issue there are several that post that it's not. There are so many variables but I have heard that overtime it does get better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree, however I think the term whether it 'works' or does not 'work' needs to be clearly defined. For some folks a hit rate of 50% or more may be acceptable or 'work' for them. However, I think a lot of folks are coming from old galaxy devices which had almost flawless success rate on the physical sensor in the back. Provided this and the fact that the ultra sonic sensor was advertised so heavily for the s10, the s10 phones with the whitestone dome glass protector installed are getting much lower success rates which makes this not 'work' for me. When you state better implies that it probably won't be as good as the prior galaxy phones which makes this a frustrating experience for me. I do caveat that I do get 10-50% success rates on the scans with the whitestone dome glass and am currently evaluating whether I want to take it off, i'm leaning towards removing it and asking for a refund.
jstodda said:
The problem is for every person that posts that it is an issue there are several that post that it's not. There are so many variables but I have heard that overtime it does get better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The oem protector is giving me issues, i can't imagine how much worse it'll be with a thicker piece of glass.
Oem doesn't use liquid adhesive. The liquid makes all the difference vs an air layer between the glass
peachpuff said:
The oem protector is giving me issues, i can't imagine how much worse it'll be with a thicker piece of glass.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The OEM protector blows. I removed it and used a Ringke skin, then a Zagg skin, and those work flawlessly. With the Samsung protector, my fingerprint was failing at least 50% of the time, now I'm at 100% success rate.
As for the glass, it's not about the thickness, it's about optical clarity. The Whitestone works well (when it's installed properly), I had it on my S9 and Note 9. The problem with whitestone is the customer service if you ever need a replacement.
Anyone had tried a UAG plyo with whitestone? I have the Monarch and it works well but will be changing to Plyo as I hate carrying powerbanks but constantly charge the buds.
I have had my Note 20 Ultra now for about 3 weeks and out of every Gorilla Glass phone I have owned this has to be the worst when it comes to micro scratches on the display. Every time I clean the screen I look and see about 10-20 more minute scratches on all parts of the screen. And while they aren't visible when the screen is on it is just disappointing that this phone which is supposed to have the toughest glass ever appears to be softer than previous generations.
Just for some background I have owned every generation of Samsung Android phones in either the S or Note variant. I never use screen protectors because even the best ones effect touch sensitivity and refract light differently never allowing you to enjoy the full beauty of Samsung's panels. I always keep a very protective case on the phone, currently the UAG Monarch, to protect the rest of the phone from scratches and more importantly damage from drops. Usually over the course of a year I wind up with a fair share of micro scratches on the screen which typically doesn't bother me at all and I accept as the cost of not protecting the screen.
I have no plans to protect the screen for the reasons I mentioned above and would still choose, even if it was new again, to go without protection. I just wanted to know if any of you were experiencing the same issue I am.
I'm experiencing an opposite reaction. Got my note 20 Ultra on release day, it's display seems to be more resilient to micro scratches than the previous Note 10 + that I owned
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
No scratches here either. Though I do baby the phone more than the average person.
Mine came with the Samsung pre installed protector and I dare not remove it.
As JerryRiggEveryrhing says " glass is glass"
I always apply the Whitestone Dome Glass Screen Protector after removing the factory fitted one as I'd always be drawn to such scratches.
Speaking of JerryRigEverything I just went and watched his videos side by side of the Note 20 Ultra and Note 10+ and to my eye it looks like the screen does in fact scratch worse on the Note 20 Ultra. The level 6 scratches on the Note 20 Ultra look more like the level 7 scratches on the Note 10+. The level 6 scratches on the Note 10+ look a lot shallower and less noticeable.
Either way it's fine I buy my phones to use them not baby them I'm just a little let down by it. To anyone who cares a lot definitely get yourself a protector because it won't take long before you will start to notice them.
Edit - The Note 10+ picture is on the left, Note 20 Ultra on the right. It was hard to get good screenshots but feel free to watch both yourself.
Note 10+
Note 20 Ultra
What kind of screen protector are you using that affects touch sensitivity and has a visible effect on image quality? I NEVER have those issues with screen protectors.
I put the Ringke dual easy due to unknown scratch resistance of the Victus glass. It looks crap in sunlight but at least it gives a little peace of mind
Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Mr. Orange 645 said:
What kind of screen protector are you using that affects touch sensitivity and has a visible effect on image quality? I NEVER have those issues with screen protectors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just about every combination of film or glass protectors that are available. For a while I really tried to find one I liked but would still wind up ripping it off in a week. Glass protectors always refract light weird and just don't have an OEM feel when using the phone. Whitestone dome came the closest but fingerprint sensor never worked right, even with relearning after applying. I really tried to like it especially after spending $60 on it but, like the rest, it wound up in the trash. I eventually gave up and just decided to go naked and have never turned back.
cac9478 said:
Just about every combination of film or glass protectors that are available. For a while I really tried to find one I liked but would still wind up ripping it off in a week. Glass protectors always refract light weird and just don't have an OEM feel when using the phone. Whitestone dome came the closest but fingerprint sensor never worked right, even with relearning after applying. I really tried to like it especially after spending $60 on it but, like the rest, it wound up in the trash. I eventually gave up and just decided to go naked and have never turned back.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Weird. Whitestone and similar thick screen protectors affected the FP sensor for me, but turning up screen sensitivity eliminated any affect on the touch. I've never been able to discern any visible differences in image quality, but I couldn't handle the affect on the FP sensor.
I've since switched to Ringke Easy Dual screen protectors. They're a film, and you'd never know it was there.
Sand will scratch all these screens... easily.
It will get marred sooner then latter.
Any screen protector also decrease the chance of breakage by impact as well.
I've noticed my urethane protector is hard to scratch but after 3 months... time for another $5 makeover.
I kept the one already installed that came from and yes is very easily scratched but at least it works with the finger print sensor and it's free, and keeps me from the hassle of installing a new one that I can't guarantee that it won't screw the FP sensor.
It appears there are already a ton of screen protectors, and I definitely want to get one. My preference is glass or a hybrid, not a tpu. I've been looking at the zaggs but they are expensive. However, I have one on my galaxy watch 4 and I have yet to have even a scratch on it (self healing).
So, what are you getting, did you get?
Whitestone Dome Premium Film is what I ordered. Will install it as soon as my S22U arrives
I have the Whitestone Dome glass 2pk from Amazon and it offered like a 30% off coupon I believe. I received the S22 Ultra delivery late in the day, so I haven't had a chance to set it up yet. But early tomorrow morning I'll install the Dome glass. It was perfect on my N20 Ultra, so I'm sure it'll be great on the S22 Ultra.
Got the Amfilm UV tempered glass. I'm terrible with these installations and botched the install. Good thing Amfilm has a lenient warranty unlike Whitestone. I also see a white halo around the fingerprint scanner when looking at white screens probably due to the the provided weight. They also didn't provide speaker stickers. Would probably not recommend Amfilm for this phone.
Kawaisa said:
Got the Amfilm UV tempered glass. I'm terrible with these installations and botched the install. Good thing Amfilm has a lenient warranty unlike Whitestone. I also see a white halo around the fingerprint scanner when looking at white screens probably due to the the provided weight. They also didn't provide speaker stickers. Would probably not recommend Amfilm for this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I installed the Amfilm and had a few bubbles appear. Did not need speaker sticker cause the glue never leaked passed the glass which was great. I contacted Amfilm and they are sending me a replacment glass for the one that had the bubbles. I also used Amfilm on my Note 20 Ultra and it works great. I used to use whitestone dome but it would always start to peel away on the edges. The Amfilm did not have that isssue and would last longer than a year with no peeling.
Zagg Fusion Curve. Had the guy at best buy put it on and it looks good. I don't have the patience anymore to install them and bubbles drive me crazy.
I have the Whitestone tempered glass on my S22 Ultra and was a flawless install and works great, some people have reported issues with the Whitestone tempered glass one with the FPR, but I have no issue with it.
If y'all get a good case you wouldn't even need a screen protector. I have had the s7 Edge, Note 8 and S20 Ultra and every time I traded in to Samsung the phones were in prestine condition without a single scratch anywhere on phone.
Th s7 Edge and Note 8 spent their life in an OtterBox Commuter case and most of every day in my jeans pocket while at work. With the S20 Ultra and S22 Ultra I stepped up to the OtterBox Defender Pro with belt clip. My 20 Ultra fell on the concrete floor of our restaurant kitchen 3 times and never sustained scratch because the OtterBox protected it.
I also never wipe my screen with anything but a microfiber eye glass lens cleaning cloth. I use Zeiss lens cleaner as well because it doesn't have alcohol and safe for eye glass coatings so it good for your phone screen too.
Not a marketing rep for OtterBox it's just my experience with their cases. The Commuter is good for people that want to keep phone in pockets. The Defender is good for people that work in harsh conditions and want to wear it on there belt. Point being a good case will save your phone in a fall and that fancy screen protector is not going to save your phone. The point is it is supposed to protect against scratches. But I have had 4 phones with Gorilla glass from Samsung and never scratched any of them with normal usage and having a good case protecting the phone.
The most important thing is never ever wipe your phone screen with a paper towel or chemical cleaners like Windex. Always use microfiber and lens cleaner. You don't need to carry lense cleaner around everywhere you go. Just use it when you home and carry the tiny microfiber cloth in your back pocket when on the go.
That's my experience on with phones without screen protectors. If your really want a screen protector by all means go buy one but they are not really necessary unless your extremely careless and don't have your phone in a case.
I like Matte finish to get rid of some glare so I went with the Skinomi Matte wet install film.
I went with the Mowei tempered glass screen protector. It comes in a pack of three and a very nice installation cradle to ensure a perfect application. I chose it over Whitestone or amFilm because it covers the entire front without the U-shaped cutout around the front camera.
I like this TPU (https://amzn.to/3sdn6HQ) screen protector. Took about 30 seconds to install, no bubbles, no orange peal... honestly looks like nothing is there. No edge lifting either for the 3 days I've had the phone so far.
bjtcars said:
Zagg Fusion Curve. Had the guy at best buy put it on and it looks good. I don't have the patience anymore to install them and bubbles drive me crazy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it full adhesive? Or does it have the glue over the fingerprint reader?
it is full adhesive it came out nice. I rescanned my fingerprints after and works great.
I'm using the note 20 ultra lk tpu film and it fits perfect!
bjtcars said:
it is full adhesive it came out nice. I rescanned my fingerprints after and works great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to hear as I ordered this one and the Whitestone. They're both waiting for my graphite Ultra to arrive. I will try the ZAGG first since it's not as involved as the other.
One question though... Is the ZAGG glass, hybrid, or film? I won't open it until it's time to put it on.
Spigen Neo Flex. I've been using it since s8. It's reall easy to apply (wet application with possible realignment) and fairly durable for a plastic.
On a side note - it seems to be a little bit harder than neoflex for n20u which i was previously using
I had a matte hydrogel screen protector installed. Been on the matte screen protector bandwagon since the OG Galaxy S
MasterBelch said:
Good to hear as I ordered this one and the Whitestone. They're both waiting for my graphite Ultra to arrive. I will try the ZAGG first since it's not as involved as the other.
One question though... Is the ZAGG glass, hybrid, or film? I won't open it until it's time to put it on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hybrid
bjtcars said:
Zagg Fusion Curve. Had the guy at best buy put it on and it looks good. I don't have the patience anymore to install them and bubbles drive me crazy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just got this same one last night from Verizon. Looks good and doesn't feel like a plastic film at all. FP sensor works wonderfully as well.
I remember when I had the Note 20 Ultra and my screen got a micro scratch on the first week.. I was so upset. Always got to have a screen protector on now. For my S22 Ultra, I got the ZAGG InvisibleShield for $50.. with lifetime replacement at bestbuy.
Personally, as I’ve written in other threads, I found the IMBZBK straightforward to install with an excellent result, including being able to turn off screen protector mode. I remained open-minded about the Whitestone Dome, which although somewhat more expensive has been around longer and has a premiere reputation.
I’ve now seen a YouTube comparison of both screen protectors, including their installation and the results, along with eight others. See here (they’re the 9th and 10th shown). YMMV, but to me the Whitestone installation seems much more difficult with more opportunities for something to go wrong. Does anyone here have personal experience with both?
If I'm not mistaken, I've used Whitestone back on my Pixel 2 XL way back when, but I too am using a IMBZBK screen protector(film). This new method for installing the screen protectors has easily became my favorite out of everytime I've ever applied one and I'm really glad all the makers of screen protectors seem to be adopting the same installation method.
As for the Whitestone, I understand reputation and all, but if something just works, I don't see the need in spending the extra cash but to each their own.
I too don't use screen protector mode on my device and the only time my fingerprint doesn't work is if it's oily, basically just not fully clean.
Since getting used to the MOCA glue method screen protectors starting with the Pixel 6 Pro, I'm hesitant to try anything other than Whitestone. I know I used one of these types of screen protectors before - might have been this brand, and I had a bubble I just could never get out - most other bubbles I got out, but there was one that was the bubble from hell. With the MOCA glue Whitestone Dome, I never even get a bubble to begin with. With a discount for the Whitestone Dome on the Pixel 7 Pro, it was ~$35 for a kit of two, one for my wife and one for me. I can handle that.
I'll probably stick with Whitestone until/if I ever have a bad experience.
But yes, to each their own, and what works for you is good.
Edit: I don't use screen protector mode, either. Fingerprint is still fast.
roirraW edor ehT said:
Since getting used to the MOCA glue method screen protectors starting with the Pixel 6 Pro, I'm hesitant to try anything other than Whitestone. I know I used one of these types of screen protectors before - might have been this brand, and I had a bubble I just could never get out - most other bubbles I got out, but there was one that was the bubble from hell. With the MOCA glue Whitestone Dome, I never even get a bubble to begin with. With a discount for the Whitestone Dome on the Pixel 7 Pro, it was ~$35 for a kit of two, one for my wife and one for me. I can handle that.
I'll probably stick with Whitestone until/if I ever have a bad experience.
But yes, to each their own, and what works for you is good.
Edit: I don't use screen protector mode, either. Fingerprint is still fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Respectfully, the point of comparing the Whitestone to the IMBZBK is that it, too, is a LOCA install, but easier and less open to error than the Whitestone (unless the YouTube video is misleading).
RebDovid said:
Respectfully, the point of comparing the Whitestone to the IMBZBK is that it, too, is a LOCA install, but easier and less open to error than the Whitestone (unless the YouTube video is misleading).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whoops, LOCA, guess I wasn't as used to it as I thought. I was also working on home network earlier, hence MOCA.
My point was that my experience wasn't less open to error for me, but what's good for one person isn't necessarily what's good for all.
I think one difference between the Whitestone and IMBZBK may be the thickness of the glass. Whitestone used to say their glass was .33mm thick (about 3 yrs ago). although I can't find a recent statement on how thick it now is (think I saw somewhere that it was .26mm for the Pixel 6, but not sure). IMBZBK says theirs is .16mm thick.
I've done both the kits and in my particular case the IMBZBK had multiple issues. One of the screen protectors didn't have protective film on the back but they put the sticker on the back of the glass. I found the nubs or little colored clamps whatever they were in my case lifted the glass too high in one area so the adhesive didn't flow all the way. 2nd attempt there was a bubble in the same area to a lesser extent. I ended up cleaning the third one off and using the film to remove dust and just did it freehand no jig etc (which I've done multiple times before) and the application was perfect. I saw some users had similar issues to me and others had no problem at all with the install via their jig. So to me that shows there's a QC issue. That and them using their ratings from other products to give the p7p a high rating is kind of scummy imo.
Got the Whitestone and took off the IMBZBK and installed the Whitestone first time no issues with the kit at all. To me the glass feels better than the IMBZBK and the olephobic coat seems better as well. Plus not having to use a weight on the FP sensor (another possible point of failure) is a plus to me. Longterm we know Whitestone's adhesive will hold up and not lift and have webbing appear on the sides. Only time will tell how well the IMBZBK will hold up. Hopefully IMBZBK steps up their game and sorts out their QC issues and show they have a high quality long lasting product as competition is always a good thing.
My Whitestone arrives later today. The installation routine debate not withstanding I do see in the comparison video that the Whitestone is SHORTER in length than the IMBZBK. In other words there is more uncovered screen space above the selfie as well as at the bottom of the screen. I assume this is to mitigate any contact with a case that could cause the protector to lift up. So I guess it all depends on the case you are using as to how the protector looks after installation. I will be using a Spigen Rugged Armor which also arrives today so I will see how much of a gap is left between the Whitestone and the Spigen.
Installed my Whitestone. Fits perfectly. Using a Spigen Rugged Armor case and as usual it fits perfectly. The uncovered area above the selfie and at the bottom edge are as minimal as anyone could want using the Spigen case. I cannot speak to any other case(s) but I am pleased. The Whitestone installation was easy. Maybe not as "easy" as the olden days when you could just lay a FLAT 9H tempered glass screen protector on just about any phone...but easy nonetheless. I do encourage watching the installation video at least once to get the procedure in mind before starting.
I also appreciate the clear "tape" for the camera bump. Any protection against micro scratches is better than no protection. I figure if it gets boogered up over time I can just peel it off...no biggie!
Highly recommend both the Whitestone and the Spigen! YMMV
P.S. I did not have to redo any of my fingerprints! I also did not have to change the sensitivity setting for the fingerprints. So everything is good to go for me!
One more P.S. The Whitestone feels much smoother than even the original unprotected screen. Again YMMV.
Is there any discount codes for ordering Whitestone via Amazon?
In IMBZBK and Whitestone, it appears we have two first-rate, curved tempered glass screen protectors for the Pixel 7 Pro, both using LOCA and UV-curing. The main differences appear to be:
IMBZBK is $5, or 12.5%, less expensive than Whitestone.
Whitestone includes a more useful to some, because clear, rear camera protector. (I myself am not using the IMBZBK rear camera protector.)
IMBZBK includes three screen protectors; Whitestone only two. (For people seeking to protect more than one P7P, this can increase dramatically the cost-saving from using IMBZBK.)
Installing IMBZBK may be somewhat less prone to user error (based on my watching several YouTube videos; I have no personal experience with Whitestone).
Whitestone has a longer track record, which may provide greater confidence when considering spending c. 2.5-4 times more than on most (often less satisfactory) screen protectors.
jaseman said:
Installed my Whitestone. Fits perfectly. Using a Spigen Rugged Armor case and as usual it fits perfectly. The uncovered area above the selfie and at the bottom edge are as minimal as anyone could want using the Spigen case. I cannot speak to any other case(s) but I am pleased. The Whitestone installation was easy. Maybe not as "easy" as the olden days when you could just lay a FLAT 9H tempered glass screen protector on just about any phone...but easy nonetheless. I do encourage watching the installation video at least once to get the procedure in mind before starting.
I also appreciate the clear "tape" for the camera bump. Any protection against micro scratches is better than no protection. I figure if it gets boogered up over time I can just peel it off...no biggie!
Highly recommend both the Whitestone and the Spigen! YMMV
P.S. I did not have to redo any of my fingerprints! I also did not have to change the sensitivity setting for the fingerprints. So everything is good to go for me!
One more P.S. The Whitestone feels much smoother than even the original unprotected screen. Again YMMV.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you think either of these screen protectors will go on sale for black Friday?
swieder711 said:
Do you think either of these screen protectors will go on sale for black Friday?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not ignoring you. I just don't know.
IMBZK is currently on sale at Amazon for $28 (20% off). I am returning my Skinomi protectors because the edges are lifting up. Bought the IMBZK. After the return credit, net cost was $20. Arrives in 1 day.
Curiousn00b said:
If I'm not mistaken, I've used Whitestone back on my Pixel 2 XL way back when, but I too am using a IMBZBK screen protector(film). This new method for installing the screen protectors has easily became my favorite out of everytime I've ever applied one and I'm really glad all the makers of screen protectors seem to be adopting the same installation method.
As for the Whitestone, I understand reputation and all, but if something just works, I don't see the need in spending the extra cash but to each their own.
I too don't use screen protector mode on my device and the only time my fingerprint doesn't work is if it's oily, basically just not fully clean.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm with you. I love the process of installing Film Screen Protectors. I'm using a TOCOL protector, but have the same results with Screen Protector Mode off.
Jeez! That IMBZBK one is like a science experiment. lol
So, what happens to the adhesive when it's time to trade the phone in?
I'm using this LK screen protection. Used on S22U & now on my P7Pro.
Everthing works well including the fingerprint. It goes all the way to the curves of the screen
https://www.amazon.fr/gp/product/B0BG63SQ8R/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o07_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
HipKat said:
Jeez! That IMBZBK one is like a science experiment. lol
So, what happens to the adhesive when it's time to trade the phone in?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Usually there's hardly any trace of it. A quick wipe down and you're set to go.
First time using these glass protectors that require curing. The Whitestone kit looks like a science experiment, it was a bit intimidating when I saw all the parts. But I watched an installation video twice and got mine installed smoothly and flawlessly on the first go. They really made it pretty fool proof.
My gripe is while I prefer and like the clear camera bar protector, they had no labels so I had no way of telling which is the right side. That installation didn't go as well
My IMBZBK installation went terrible. First attempt there were bubbles. Second attempt, I worked to remove all the bubbles before curing. Still had some bubbles, but even worse the surface of the protector was sticky and streaky. Maybe some of the glue got on the surface while I was dapping the excess off.
Amazon Returns is sending me a replacement. While packing up the old kit, I noticed that the frame was broken/cracked.
Hopefully, the installation will go better with the replacement kit. I need to be extra careful getting rid of any bubbles and keeping any glue off of the top surface.