hello.....friend i m planning to buy galaxy s but here i am confused between i9000 and i9003.
my question is that what is best for me
i9000 or i9003 ??? :-\
budget is not constrain..
As per gaming performance..which 1 is best?
4 inch screen is perfect 4 me.
so i9000 or i9003?? ???
plz reply ..
i'm perfexctly satisfied with the i9000. besides theres so much developement still going on, so i'm not afraid keeping it one more year
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
absolutely agreeing.
i'm very happy with my i9000 and there are so much developers still creating new awesome stuff for this device
Almost the same except for battery and some small differences
This two phones are practically the same thing, however the mos important difference (and mainly the only difference) is the battery and Chipset:
i9000: Standard battery, Li-Ion 1500 mAh
Chipset: Hummingbird
i9003 Standard battery, Li-Ion 1650 mAh
Chipset: TI OMAP 3630
I'd go for the i9000, it has a smaller battery however in stand by mode it seems to consume less battery (This need to be proven in real life though) and the GPU seem to be a newer version meaning better graphics
Check the FULL COMPARISON HERE
Cheers..
hi guys so thought of opening this thread to see ur openions on reasons to get the new Note and if its worth buying for you
for me i would defently get it and my reasons are
Big screen
S-pen
Leather back and beautiful design
and i think the new battery will be a lot lot better than my S3's
I have only one reason, to give me as a christmas gift the Note 3-> i'am on a HOX now
my reason is simple "because my note1 is old and start to make problems"
I am very interested in the Note 3 if the battery shows it can get a full day's use in a single charge. My RAZR Maxx HD has spoiled me... I don't need 48 hours but I do need around 16 hours with heavy usage - 4 to 5+ hours of screen on time.
Sent from my XT926 Vanquish
The Note 3 should get around 5-7 hours on screen time easily.
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk 4
Hardcore73 said:
The Note 3 should get around 5-7 hours on screen time easily.
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can't wait to see some screenshots of that....
Sent from my XT926 Vanquish
Notrega said:
I am very interested in the Note 3 if the battery shows it can get a full day's use in a single charge.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the extra four hours of video playback that Samsung quoted at the launch event are going to turn out to be true. Not because of some Samsung wizardry or a slightly larger battery but because of the efficiency of S-800. Here are some excerpts from Anandtech's battery review of the S-800 LG G2. Samsung's better with s/w than LG so I'd expect even better performance from the N3. Obviously comparing a LCD and AMOLED panel 1:1 isn't appropriate and typically AMOLED does better on dark colors (video) and LCD does better on light colors (web browsing). But the percentage gains Brian talks about in the review comparing the similar G1<>G2 should apply to the N2<>N3; maybe even more so because Exynos 4 is a far older design than the S4 Pro in the G1.
One of the things Qualcomm promised would come with Snapdragon 800 (8974) (and by extension the process improvement with 28nm HPM) was lower power consumption, especially versus Snapdragon 600 (8064). There are improvements throughout the overall Snapdragon 800 platform which help as well, newer PMIC (PM8941) and that newer modem block onboard as well, but overall platform power goes down in the lower performance states for Snapdragon 800. In addition the G2 has a few unique power saving features of its own, including display GRAM (Graphics RAM) which enables the equivalent of panel self refresh for the display. When the display is static, the G2 can run parts of the display subsystem and AP off and save power, which they purport increases the mixed use battery life case by 10 percent overall, and 26 percent compared to the actively refreshing display equivalent. In addition the G2 has a fairly sizable 3000 mAh 3.8V (11.4 watt-hour) battery which is stacked to get the most out of the rounded shape of the device, and utilizes LG's new SiO+ anode for increased energy density compared to the conventional graphite anode.
Our battery life test is unchanged, we calibrate the display to exactly 200 nits and run it through a controlled workload consisting of a dozen or so popular pages and articles with pauses in between until the device dies. This is repeated on cellular and WiFi, in this case since we have an international model of the G2 that lacks the LTE bands used in the USA, that's 3G WCDMA on AT&T's Band 2 network. I've tested 3G battery life on devices concurrently for a while now in addition to LTE though, so we still have some meaningful comparisons. The most interesting comparisons are to the Optimus G (APQ8064) and HTC One (APQ8064T) previous generation.
The G2 also charges very fast for its battery size. I've been profiling charging behavior and current for devices for a while now, since I strongly believe that battery life and charging speed are complimentary problems. You should always opportunistically charge your smartphone, being able to draw as much while you have access to a power outlet is critical. The G2 can negotiate a 2A charge rate on my downstream charge port controller and charges very fast in that mode. Of course the PM8941 PMIC also includes some new features that Qualcomm has given QuickCharge 2.0 branding.
You can read more here...
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7251/lg-g2-and-msm8974-snapdragon-800-a-quick-look/3
In addition, Samsung's implemented Qualcomm's Envelope Tracker chip in the N3 which (supposedly) is good for a 25% overall battery life savings because of enhanced management of radio signals.
The Note contains a Qualcomm chip called an envelope tracker, which will dramatically reduce the amount of power needed to run its LTE radio. We’re going to see this technology in a lot more devices.http://gigaom.com/2013/09/05/thanks...xy-note-3s-huge-screen-wont-kill-its-battery/
It's true, it's not the battery. My Moto X with a 2100 battery can easily get 4-6 hours on screen time.
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk 4
1. Sdcard slot
2. 5.7" 1080p screen
3. huge removable battery
4. snapdragon 800
5. 3 gb ram
im sold lol
oneandroidnut said:
1. Sdcard slot
2. 5.7" 1080p screen
3. huge removable battery
4. snapdragon 800
5. 3 gb ram
im sold lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think a better quote would be samsung shut up and take my money but i'll have to settle with the Exynos because of my crappy country
Hardcore73 said:
The Note 3 should get around 5-7 hours on screen time easily.
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i hope that goes for the exynos version 2 because the 5210 was a fail so hoping the newer one will be better
my reason is because it can do everything the s4 can and even more on a larger screen,with a pen you can carry inside the phone!
My reasons to get N3-
1. Large Screen.
2. SoC - Preferring Snapdragon but i am afriad i will wind up getting the one Exynos.
3. RAM - Dude 3GB? The desktop i am using right now is having 2 GB RAM
4. Good Developer Support
5. I was fascinated by the leather touch given by sammy.
6. 13MP Camera is enough for me as i own Canon SX50 HS too.
7. Gonna pair the N3 with Gear.
Well this are my reasons, but to each his own..:angel:
N3 is gonna rule . \m/
LeviathanAP said:
My reasons to get N3-
1. Large Screen.
2. SoC - Preferring Snapdragon but i am afriad i will wind up getting the one Exynos.
3. RAM - Dude 3GB? The desktop i am using right now is having 2 GB RAM
4. Good Developer Support
5. I was fascinated by the leather touch given by sammy.
6. 13MP Camera is enough for me as i own Canon SX50 HS too.
7. Gonna pair the N3 with Gear.
Well this are my reasons, but to each his own..:angel:
N3 is gonna rule . \m/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree Note 3 is gonna rule! Only concern i have is knox locking down the bootloader very very tight
Blackwolf10 said:
i think a better quote would be samsung shut up and take my money but i'll have to settle with the Exynos because of my crappy country
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dont think that would turn me off from buying it either. no other phone can touch this thing with screen size and features not even G2
---------- Post added at 09:42 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:06 AM ----------
Blackwolf10 said:
i think a better quote would be samsung shut up and take my money but i'll have to settle with the Exynos because of my crappy country
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your crappy country might be getting a beast
http://www.sammobile.com/2013/09/11...hrough-software-upgrade/#.UjB-rwL7Ayw.twitter
oneandroidnut said:
I agree Note 3 is gonna rule! Only concern i have is knox locking down the bootloader very very tight
i dont think that would turn me off from buying it either. no other phone can touch this thing with screen size and features not even G2
---------- Post added at 09:42 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:06 AM ----------
your crappy country might be getting a beast
http://www.sammobile.com/2013/09/11...hrough-software-upgrade/#.UjB-rwL7Ayw.twitter
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
owh owh now that is nice wondering how antutu will score
Ill probably take the octa version.
The reasons because I want the note3:
1fantastic display
2)3gb ram
3)working big.LITTLE
4)multiwindow
5)Wacom pen and digitizer
6)battery life
7) Wolfson DAC on the 5420
8)good camera
Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk
Blackwolf10 said:
owh owh now that is nice wondering how antutu will score
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont know but cant be bad! and it isnt all about benchmarks for me! but they are nice for comparing devices!
I only have one reason.......
1. Because its awesome
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk 4
I have been interested in the Note since the first one but was more a fan of HTC devices and was unsure with how large it was. When I switched to Sprint (bad idea) I went with the EVO 4G LTE which I like but its starting to show its age and now that pretty much all HTC devices are going the iPhone route and not allowing you to swap out the battery or add memory I started looking more at the Note 2 and Verizon. I like the large screen and like the overall feel of the phone. Doing a little research and holding out I am now very excited to go away from Sprint and their complete lie of LTE services in my area and to Verizon and a Note 3. HTC makes some nice phones but I am ready to try something else. Hope I will be able to root it the day I get it though.
I'm getting it because I want it and need it Upgrading my phone every yr is a must.
Hey guys, i-m interesting on this device, in your opinion which android will mount?? And what new features will have?? sorry for my bad english.
Flagship Android devices of 2016 are bound to have their own version of 3D touch. Hopefully better battery life, water resistance, obviously better performance. Better cameras and whatnot. I would go for the Galaxy S7 but immediately put a Cyanogenmod ROM as soon as it is made available. Touchwiz is horrendous.
Galaxy S7 will have Headphone Jack like iPhone 6S. Big Battery Life Boost - a big jump to 3000 mAh and 3600 mAh capacities for the Galaxy S7 and Galaxy S7 Edge respectively, up from 2550 mAh and 2600 mAh of the S6 and S6 Edge.
Waterproof should be a feature like the Xperia devices. Lets hope.
Here's the video of Battery Test between Z Play and S7 Edge and Iphone7:
https://youtu.be/B3awP3-1m2U
Thanks!
Being king of endurance doesn't make the phone the overall king.
I come easily through the day with the S7 edge and combined with IP-cert and flagship power the S7E wins the match for me! If you consider that the Z play has roughly the same capacity (3,510 mAh vs 3,600 mAh) while the screen does only 1080p, the cpu is a SD 625 and there's 1 GB RAM less it does not surprise that it lasts longer.
andiling said:
Being king of endurance doesn't make the phone the overall king.
I come easily through the day with the S7 edge and combined with IP-cert and flagship power the S7E wins the match for me! If you consider that the Z play has roughly the same capacity (3,510 mAh vs 3,600 mAh) while the screen does only 1080p, the cpu is a SD 625 and there's 1 GB RAM less it does not surprise that it lasts longer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Removed that line.
ohk?
moto z play rocks. i actually wanted to get a Z play but the prices were a bit high in my country when it comes to motorola devices and it was 2 month before s8 reveal so there was a price cut on s7. anyway Z Play is a beast when it comes to battery endurance.
woomera said:
moto z play rocks. i actually wanted to get a Z play but the prices were a bit high in my country when it comes to motorola devices and it was 2 month before s8 reveal so there was a price cut on s7. anyway Z Play is a beast when it comes to battery endurance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea!!
no idea about On screen time 6 hr and go everywhere with 12000mlA power bank
Huawei Mate 20 Lite which has better battery life (3750mAh), but it's a little too big for me (158.2 x 77.2) VS. Samsung Galaxy S10e which has less battery (3100mAh), but it's smaller which is better for me (142.2 x 69.9).
Other than the battery and size, I like both phones equally, but I'm looking for something long-term because I'm not huge on phones and don't want to get a replacement every other year. I've had my current phone for years, but I have to replace it because I dropped it in the toilet and the battery drains faster than the speed of light, oops.
I also don't want the phone to lag or freeze.