Hello,
Is my Geekbench score okay or something is wrong?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Quite under the expected range. Did you perform it at ambient temperature, or used a heavy-load app stressing the chip just before running the test?
I remember my first one gave similar results, I then ran an other one and it was more accurate to the chip advertised performances.
Jaxom84 said:
Quite under the expected range. Did you perform it at ambient temperature, or used a heavy-load app stressing the chip just before running the test?
I remember my first one gave similar results, I then ran an other one and it was more accurate to the chip advertised performances.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried to run it after a while and it performs much better now, I don't know what caused it, before first test I was using Chrome nothing much...
hiMLASTAR7 said:
I tried to run it after a while and it performs much better now, I don't know what caused it, before first test I was using Chrome nothing much...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When you look at your screenshot, it seems the CPU is also focusing on how energy is spent (energy_aware), which could also explain the first results. The device can understand how you use it and adapt the power usage depending on what you "teach" it. So nothing to worry about.
Also, the Android 13 Beta is showing some improvements for Exynos versions of the device, so expect it to run even better with time.
Here are my current results with the Android 13 Beta 1 on my Exynos 2200, so you can see the little improvement.
Android 13 one ui 5 beta exynos 2200
Related
I want to try a kernel compatible with CM9 on my i9020 with a slow refresh rate to test how many battery can be saved.
I see in bedalus kernel comparison that AniDroid Hardened is a 45fps one but seem a little out of date.
Any other kernel with 45-50fps refresh?
progitto said:
I want to try a kernel compatible with CM9 on my i9020 with a slow refresh rate to test how many battery can be saved.
I see in bedalus kernel comparison that AniDroid Hardened is a 45fps one but seem a little out of date.
Any other kernel with 45-50fps refresh?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's funny. I was trying to get Anidroid 45fps to work with some of the new IMM76I ROMs this morning, but had no luck.
The best battery saving kernel is still matr1x, even with nominal voltages and 56fps.
I`ll take a test with the Matrix kernel.
Have you ever compared battery drain of two version of the same kernel with the only difference of display refresh?
I`m very curious to understand how much this parameter can be helpful in a battery saving setup
From bedalus battery drain thread
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
56 fps eat ~43mv , 65fps eat ~47mv
Thread link : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1478406
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
Yes, as you can see in the post above, and i recently tested 56 and 50 hz versions of trinity.
It definitely affects power!
Yes, I've just readed it on the battery drain thread. I have definitely to try this.
Below is first Quadrant Standard test I did after official update...WOW!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC VLE_U using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
i'm somewhat of an idiot to this quadrant speak...can you explain, to the lay person, what this means?
Jimmmycrackcorn said:
i'm somewhat of an idiot to this quadrant speak...can you explain, to the lay person, what this means?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is just an app that benchmarks your phone. Or simply put runs a series of tests on your phone to determine how fast your phone can perform tasks. It tests GPU, CPU and how efficient your phones ram is along with other things. It will then provide a score for how well your device has performed the tasks. The higher the score the better.
i get also scores >6400 (stock), whereas my friends (stock) galaxy S3 gets only 5800. I kow benchmark scores does not really say anthing about everyday-use-performance but also in this area i prefer to use the One S and can say it is indeed more fluid than S3. we can say the One S is the best phone <4,5" ..
HTC did a well done job in releasing such a powerful phone which does not have sizes of tablets but a comfortable easy to handle 4.3" screen. I hope they release Sense 5 soon, and i am waiting for the successor of One S with same dimensions but higher pixel density and higher battery-capacity.
I'm on Twisted Kernel OC'd at 1.9GHz and I'm only getting a 4k score. When I was on ViperOneS, I had a 5.8k score or something. Not fair :x
when it comes to benchmarks, for me stock was always the one with most points. does not say anything about overall performance tough
I just decided to benchmark my s6 with antutu and I am only getting a score of 45413 points. How can it score such a low point? I have seen people getting scores up to 70000.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
albysajan said:
I just decided to benchmark my s6 with antutu and I am only getting a score of 45413 points. How can it score such a low point? I have seen people getting scores up to 70000.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
caues :
-your phone was warm/hot
-your phone was on charging
-there were lot of background apps running
-you are probably running 32 bit version of antutu
-you are on power saving mode
bhavstech said:
caues :
-your phone was warm/hot
-your phone was on charging
-there were lot of background apps running
-you are probably running 32 bit version of antutu
-you are on power saving mode
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess it was due to the fact that my phone was charging at 18%.
I have some issues to
Those benchmark addicts are everywhere lol.
No. 1 reason is that your phone is hot.
The rest follows.
Getting in loved too much with benchmark scores. You're device is one of the most powerful smartphone in the market right now, don't worry
Shots fired ... fast charge gets your phone so f... hot. I did benchmark when my phone was so cold, to eleminate throtling possibilities
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hello friends. You may be aware of the Next gen Nexus 5 is manufactured by LG and recently in NEWS.
This is really unbelievable to see that the Next gen Nexus 5 has scores 85,530 in AnTuTu benchmark results.
See here for more info:
Google Nexus 5 (2015) AnTuTu benchmark result
As per some sources the highest ever AnTuTu was scored around 55k and was on a Samsung Exynos 7420.
Although the SoC of the latest Nexus 5 is not known but rumors says that this could be the next gen Qualcomm Snapdragon 820.
Share your thoughts.
Honestly, if this is true, don't expect the next nexus to be even close to a budget phone like the original n5 was.
Hyper Rational said:
Honestly, if this is true, don't expect the next nexus to be even close to a budget phone like the original n5 was.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah definitely this.
Also, I am offput by the Nexus after my nexus 4 and all of the people I know that had them. 2 years and the phone just starts to capitulate, turning off constantly despite the battery being charged and the screens break way way too easily (1 foot drop onto lovely soft carpet :crying.
I noticed Google Play Services is by far the highest battery user according to my ZenFone 6, e.g. 40% out of 78% was attributed to it:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I know PS provides services for other apps and is not itself the main problem usually but all guides I read told me that it still shouldn't use that much battery. Is this normal or do I have to hunt for a buggy app? And if so, any ideas on how?
TIA
SoWhy
SoWhy said:
I know PS provides services for other apps and is not itself the main problem usually but all guides I read told me that it still shouldn't use that much battery. Is this normal or do I have to hunt for a buggy app?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not normal, but I don't have installed your apps.
Google Play Services isn't present in my battery statistics at all, because it is probably lower than 1%.
It's a glitch. Mine does it too but I can still pull down a good day of battery sometimes more.
Also phone idle sits near the same as well which is also another glitch that needs to be fixed
Sent from my Asus Zenfone 6 using Tapatalk
Don't get me wrong, I usually still can go two days without problems but it still seems weird for PS to appear to drain so much
For what it's worth and for those who are interested, the latest beta update for PS seems to have fixed it
SoWhy said:
For what it's worth and for those who are interested, the latest beta update for PS seems to have fixed it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I face the same problem. How did you fix that.?
I am on Android 9 only without root.
Thanks!