Below is first Quadrant Standard test I did after official update...WOW!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC VLE_U using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
i'm somewhat of an idiot to this quadrant speak...can you explain, to the lay person, what this means?
Jimmmycrackcorn said:
i'm somewhat of an idiot to this quadrant speak...can you explain, to the lay person, what this means?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is just an app that benchmarks your phone. Or simply put runs a series of tests on your phone to determine how fast your phone can perform tasks. It tests GPU, CPU and how efficient your phones ram is along with other things. It will then provide a score for how well your device has performed the tasks. The higher the score the better.
i get also scores >6400 (stock), whereas my friends (stock) galaxy S3 gets only 5800. I kow benchmark scores does not really say anthing about everyday-use-performance but also in this area i prefer to use the One S and can say it is indeed more fluid than S3. we can say the One S is the best phone <4,5" ..
HTC did a well done job in releasing such a powerful phone which does not have sizes of tablets but a comfortable easy to handle 4.3" screen. I hope they release Sense 5 soon, and i am waiting for the successor of One S with same dimensions but higher pixel density and higher battery-capacity.
I'm on Twisted Kernel OC'd at 1.9GHz and I'm only getting a 4k score. When I was on ViperOneS, I had a 5.8k score or something. Not fair :x
when it comes to benchmarks, for me stock was always the one with most points. does not say anything about overall performance tough
Related
Hi i am in the balance of getting an atrix 4g or an atrix 2 and i want more data.
cold someone post a quadrant score of the fastest most overclocked rom here (that is stable) so that i can compare. also could someone tell me the xvid hardware capabilities?(if there are any?)
pashinator said:
Hi i am in the balance of getting an atrix 4g or an atrix 2 and i want more data.
cold someone post a quadrant score of the fastest most overclocked rom here (that is stable) so that i can compare. also could someone tell me the xvid hardware capabilities?(if there are any?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Atrix 2 has (on average) higher benchmarks than the og Atrix. The TI OMAP4 is much more optimized, and especially because of overclocking, the benchmarks should be a lt higher. I'll post a screenshot later, I'm a little busy
Just to give you an idea, I'll put up the numbrs for a stock Atrix 2:
Quadrant Score: 1924
AnTuTu Benchmark v2.5.4: 4278
For some reason Screen Grabber isn't working atm..."unknown error aquiring image from device"
Just from looking at the rankings from AnTuTu, the top ranked A2 running the Supercharged ROM is hitting 1,375Mhz and scored @6,543.
Runnin ifaber06's BEAST ROM V4 Supercharged. @ 1325 mhz my chip has been getting broke in good ...good looking you guys are off the chain! !!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Linpacks
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
Edit I was running these kinda numbers on my G2X @ 1.5 MHz...this phone has got potential ..
Attached is a snapshot of the most recent top AnTuTu rankings for the A2...
I have no idea what that guy in Russia did with his to get a score of 7678 at 1280MHz..
I've been a big fan of Antutu and have been using it to compare performances for several phones. However, I noticed that in several places when they compare Att vs. International hox, no one posted the Antutu benchmark results.
Below is the result from international HOX.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
And this is the result from my local Att store's HOX
There is a huge difference. And they still say that the two phones are comparable in processor performance, why?
Sent from my HTC One X on Leedroid's ROM v5.0.0.
This topic has already been discussed ad nauseum in this forum. Antutu is highly threaded and thus able to take advantage of all four cores on the Tegra 3. In the rare situations where an app is able to take full advantage of four cores of the Tegra3, it will come out ahead. However, this does not represent the common use case. Even on the desktop, few apps take advantage of more than one core, let alone two. The advantage of four cores is debatable. The advantage of faster, more energy efficient cores is not.
I agree. Every benchmark has it's own bias.
For example, the dual core will destroy the quad in something like linpack. Or increasing just the SD cache size will add a ridiculous amount to your quadrant score.
None of them truly represent actual performance. The only ones that can would be actual in-game benchmarks of games with the FPS shown. And that's just if you want to benchmark the gaming performance.
Let me tell you about a deal..
Right Now in the U.S.A. @ Wal-Mart you can purchase the Alcatel Fierce for $129.00
MediaTek 1.2 Ghz Quad-Core.. (One-Click Rootable took me 2 minutes)
4.5 inch display
5.0 mp Camera with Flash
4.2.2 Jellybean..
And best of all.. You get to make your 32Gb SD Card your *Primary Storage*.. just select the option in settings:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
No messing with foldermount, stickmount or anything else.. Stick in your SD Card select it done...
Adjust your Developer Options, run Nova or Holo and this 1.2 Quad-Core is very fast
Not benchmarking.. Real World Fast. I took it into a T-Mo store to compare it to the LG-G2 to decide if I wanted to get the LG-G2 to match my G-Pad 8.3
or keep this deal.. I'm keeping this deal for sure. Forget Synthetic Benchmarks, side by side, negligible difference.. certainly not enough to warrant spending $500.00 more..
Will it get any development here? Maybe, Maybe Not. Time will tell.. At $129.00 vs $199.00 for the 16 Gb Moto G is this a better way to go?
For my money, Yes the Alcatel Fierce is a steal of a deal..
Nice deal, however the moto G has KitKat, of course it depends on each persons use but still. About the processors, mediatek processors are good for normal stuff but wud lag in games or any other stuff. There are other phns in this range as well but no doubt this deal is very good
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Couldnt handle fast and furious game. Sorry but not sorry
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hello friends. You may be aware of the Next gen Nexus 5 is manufactured by LG and recently in NEWS.
This is really unbelievable to see that the Next gen Nexus 5 has scores 85,530 in AnTuTu benchmark results.
See here for more info:
Google Nexus 5 (2015) AnTuTu benchmark result
As per some sources the highest ever AnTuTu was scored around 55k and was on a Samsung Exynos 7420.
Although the SoC of the latest Nexus 5 is not known but rumors says that this could be the next gen Qualcomm Snapdragon 820.
Share your thoughts.
Honestly, if this is true, don't expect the next nexus to be even close to a budget phone like the original n5 was.
Hyper Rational said:
Honestly, if this is true, don't expect the next nexus to be even close to a budget phone like the original n5 was.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah definitely this.
Also, I am offput by the Nexus after my nexus 4 and all of the people I know that had them. 2 years and the phone just starts to capitulate, turning off constantly despite the battery being charged and the screens break way way too easily (1 foot drop onto lovely soft carpet :crying.
Hello,
Is my Geekbench score okay or something is wrong?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Quite under the expected range. Did you perform it at ambient temperature, or used a heavy-load app stressing the chip just before running the test?
I remember my first one gave similar results, I then ran an other one and it was more accurate to the chip advertised performances.
Jaxom84 said:
Quite under the expected range. Did you perform it at ambient temperature, or used a heavy-load app stressing the chip just before running the test?
I remember my first one gave similar results, I then ran an other one and it was more accurate to the chip advertised performances.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried to run it after a while and it performs much better now, I don't know what caused it, before first test I was using Chrome nothing much...
hiMLASTAR7 said:
I tried to run it after a while and it performs much better now, I don't know what caused it, before first test I was using Chrome nothing much...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When you look at your screenshot, it seems the CPU is also focusing on how energy is spent (energy_aware), which could also explain the first results. The device can understand how you use it and adapt the power usage depending on what you "teach" it. So nothing to worry about.
Also, the Android 13 Beta is showing some improvements for Exynos versions of the device, so expect it to run even better with time.
Here are my current results with the Android 13 Beta 1 on my Exynos 2200, so you can see the little improvement.
Android 13 one ui 5 beta exynos 2200