Hi Guys,
is it only my device or does the exynos model suck in general?
This is my S22U(Exynos):
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
And here the Tab S8(Snapdragon):
I don't recognize the screenshots, with what are you testing? And what are you actually doing, copy some files from one location to another on the internal storage?
Yeah it sucks.
Batfink33 said:
Yeah it sucks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anything to backup your affirmation or just another preconceived idea?
My Exynos is just what I wanted...no heating, no lag, stutter or whatever, it is fast, I have 6 hrs+ SOT, blazing fast 5G speeds and it lasts the whole day...
Rapier said:
Anything to backup your affirmation or just another preconceived idea?
My Exynos is just what I wanted...no heating, no lag, stutter or whatever, it is fast, I have 6 hrs+ SOT, blazing fast 5G speeds and it lasts the whole day...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have a try at using the Zf4 beside it. You'll see the difference, heck even the ZF3 with sd888 is more efficient and smoother/has less frame drops.
Batfink33 said:
Have a try at using the Zf4 beside it. You'll see the difference, heck even the ZF3 with sd888 is more efficient and smoother/has less frame drops.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't contest a Fold could be faster, I also owned a Fold 3 for some time then returned it as it doesn't fit my needs so I know how they are. But the Exynos 2200 is very close with it's SD counterpart and to be honest I don't care about some marginal higher benchmark scores. I don't do benchmarks, I just use the phone (mainly business) and it never failed me, or had lag or stutter. It just works and is flawless at everything I throw at it.
I don't want to enter in the Exy vs SD debate, it is neverending but saying that it "sucks" at least for the S22 series is completely wrong, actually in tests SD is heating more and suffers from throttling
Rapier said:
I don't contest a Fold could be faster, I also owned a Fold 3 for some time then returned it as it doesn't fit my needs so I know how they are. But the Exynos 2200 is very close with it's SD counterpart and to be honest I don't care about some marginal higher benchmark scores. I don't do benchmarks, I just use the phone (mainly business) and it never failed me. I don't want to enter in the Exy vs SD debate, it is neverending but saying that it "sucks" at least for the S22 series is completely wrong, actually in tests SD is heating more and suffers from throttling
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both the Exynos 2200 and SD 8 Gen 1 both suffer from efficiency problems because the 4nm Samsung Foundry manufacturing process was a failure (hence Qualcomm going to TSMC for the 8+Gen1). It's good that you like the phone and it works for you but there is without a doubt frame drops and general stutter on the Exynos s22u, if it doesn't bother you then great but it bothers me and obviously other S22u users on this forum.
Batfink33 said:
Both the Exynos 2200 and SD 8 Gen 1 both suffer from efficiency problems because the 4nm Samsung Foundry manufacturing process was a failure (hence Qualcomm going to TSMC for the 8+Gen1). It's good that you like the phone and it works for you but there is without a doubt frame drops and general stutter on the Exynos s22u, if it doesn't bother you then great but it bothers me and obviously other S22u users on this forum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw posts and heard people complaining so I don't say it doesnt. Just that it is not general or for all devices. It is not that I am not bothered, I just never encountered lag or stutter on my device and I doubt mine is unique. Maybe I use apps that don't lag, dunno...can you give me some examples of apps where lag is happening? And I don't say about that Reddit thread with scrolling lags because there I have lag too. I am talking about aps or settings on the phone where you do something and it lags. I'll try just to test
Rapier said:
I saw posts and heard people complaining so I don't say it doesnt. Just that it is not general or for all devices. It is not that I am not bothered, I just never encountered lag or stutter on my device and I doubt mine is unique. Maybe I use apps that don't lag, dunno...can you give me some examples of apps where lag is happening? And I don't say about that Reddit thread with scrolling lags because there I have lag too. I am talking about aps or settings on the phone where you do something and it lags. I'll try just to test
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Animations drop frames and yes scrolling on Twitter and Reddit stutter. Like I said, use it beside the Zf4 or even the ZF3 and you can see the difference even scrolling on the apps. FWIW, I had similar on the P6P which basically uses and Exynos. The S22u doesn't perform badly as such, it just doesn't perform like a £1400 phone should.
So, getting back to the topic that was posted, what does any of the above have to do with SMB performance? Numbers were posted via screenshots that are in a foreign language that most don't understand. SMB infers a network copy file operation so a lot to be considered here other than just the phone. As a matter of fact, I would say the phone factors in less that 50% with regards to SMB performance.
I backup and restore a lot of things with network shares. It is a common use case for me. Fact is the SD 8 Gen 1 is almost twice as fast.
Other than that the phone is not bad.
my exinos do its work no lags no loose of frame
twitter and reddit for me are unuseful and banned from all ny phones and tablets only good to waste time i have two s22 exinos and no problems al all
i use the phone don't play with benchmarks
gianoi said:
my exinos do its work no lags no loose of frame
twitter and reddit for me are unuseful and banned from all ny phones and tablets only good to waste time i have two s22 exinos and no problems al all
i use the phone don't play with benchmarks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same but the point here was performance of network transfers via SMB....I don't use SMB shares so can't check transfer speeds at the moment but I might setup one just for the sake of testing. I find cloud sharing much easier to use for me tho
my files are all on nas and pendrive in Italia cloud is not very good and working is an optional like streaming (dazn docet) only in big cities you can use it and not always
for years I've worked in a public company and backup was something really not in the mind of our central company
da noi si usa dire "chi fa da sé fa per tre"
Exynos I get around 20 MB/s with SMB2
bhammler said:
Exynos I get around 20 MB/s with SMB2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is insane. Are you on Beta? Did you change something?
accidently send it twice...
I often have performance problems when using SMB on android/linux.
Try to use SFTP, its much faster.
Ramsi Hartmann said:
That is insane. Are you on Beta? Did you change something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think, my phone just had a lucky day. I've made some testing, and my speed sucks around 1-5 MB/s
Related
update:
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013...rking-adjustments-inflate-scores-by-up-to-20/
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013...ig-and-it-pulls-some-benchmark-shenanigans/3/
Again, the benchmarks are not useful, samsung tricks them using special modes that the phone will not be able to use in non-benchmarks apps.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
kersh said:
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013...ig-and-it-pulls-some-benchmark-shenanigans/3/
Again, all of the benchmarks are not usefull, samsung tricks it and uses special modes that the phone will not be able to use in non-benchmarks apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty scummy of Samsung but I'm sure they aren't alone in benchmark cheating.
kersh said:
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013...ig-and-it-pulls-some-benchmark-shenanigans/3/
Again, all of the benchmarks are not usefull, samsung tricks it and uses special modes that the phone will not be able to use in non-benchmarks apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. Not a good practice on Samsung's part, but who really cares. I'm not buying this phone because of benchmark scores.
Thats unfortunate.
OMG! Call the phone police!
CPU performance is honestly excellent. The Galaxy Note 3 is more or less the fastest Android smartphone we've tested up to this point. In the situations where we can do cross platform (OS/browser) comparisons, it isn't quite as fast as the iPhone 5s but in some cases it comes close. I should mention that the Note 3 (like many other Android devices - SGS4, HTC One) detects certain benchmarks and ensures CPU frequencies are running at max while running them, rather than relying on the benchmark workload to organically drive DVFS to those frequencies. Max supported CPU frequency is never exceeded in this process, the platform simply primes itself for running those tests as soon as they're detected. The impact is likely small since most of these tests should drive CPU frequencies to their max state regardless (at least on the CPU side), but I'm going to make it a point to call out this behavior whenever I see it from now on.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7376/samsung-galaxy-note-3-review/4
Does it matter? Is that going to sway anyones buying decision? The phone is blazing fast. In the real world as long as it plays that video you want to see and plays whatever games you want to play, who cares?
dkb218 said:
Does it matter? Is that going to sway anyones buying decision? The phone is blazing fast. In the real world as long as it plays that video you want to see and plays whatever games you want to play, who cares?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Cliff Notes from what Brian at Anandtech explained is that detecting a benchmark running, certain OEMs prime the CPU to run at max output rather than waiting for the request. As he said, the benchmarks run (or at least should) the CPU at max output anyway. It's the difference between testing a car's 0-60MPH speed from a standing start and rolling start. Except in this case you're talking about milliseconds of having the SoC at max output before a benchmark would have pushed the CPU there on its own.
Tempest in a tea pot.
Guys, it's only benchmarks.
If you consider it cheating, than I'm sure Samsung won't be alone doing this (as mentioned in Anandtech review).
Who knows even Apple might also did this.
Benchmark performance only amaze techgeek persons. Most people won't care or even read about it.
I'm more concerned about the performance issues mentioned in ars technica review such as Gallery app.
Does anyone else who already got their phone experienced the same issue?
I stopped believing in benchmarks a long time ago. IMO, they really only serve to give you a general idea of how units of similar hardware/setup might perform. I don't believe there's any true "real world" performance tests that can be done. In the end, only you can decide if something's gonna fit your needs by actually physically messing around with it...
Yeah, who cares about benchmarks. Samsung isn't making the phone perform at some magical speed. The phone is fully capable of performing at the level Samsung 'tricks' the benchmarks into believing. It's just that, the e-peen contests people get from showing off their benchmarks don't equate to real world performance.
Who really cares about benchmarks....really?
wth is "benchmark booster" and why is it only applied to the N3 tests? Extremely fishy
weirdingway said:
wth is "benchmark booster" and why is it only applied to the N3 tests? Extremely fishy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's like putting track tires on a sports car so you can post a better Nurburgring time. They stuck in code that recognizes when popular benchmarking software is being started and it makes sure the CPU is running full out of the gate to goose the figures a bit. You can decide to what degree that is deceptive, but to call it "lying" as the post title suggests is probably a bit of hyperbole.
redpill2016 said:
It's like putting track tires on a sports car so you can post a better Nurburgring time. They stuck in code that recognizes when popular benchmarking software is being started and it makes sure the CPU is running full out of the gate to goose the figures a bit. You can decide to what degree that is deceptive, but to call it "lying" as the post title suggests is probably a bit of hyperbole.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or car manufactures with car consumption They are all "cheating" for years and you can't do a shi*** and we still going to buy the car...
With "cheating" or not Note 3 is the best god damn phone on the market.
redpill2016 said:
It's like putting track tires on a sports car so you can post a better Nurburgring time. They stuck in code that recognizes when popular benchmarking software is being started and it makes sure the CPU is running full out of the gate to goose the figures a bit. You can decide to what degree that is deceptive, but to call it "lying" as the post title suggests is probably a bit of hyperbole.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it would have been ok if they applied the same method to the other phones
Benchmarks are for cheerleaders.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Benchmarks matter. They are the quickest least subjective way to compare power between phones.
Im sure Sammy isnt the only one , but its a slippery slope. What I dont want to see is them capping processing power to proclaim longer battery life while still advertising or benchmarking a full capacity CPU/GPU.
This is not worst than phone manufacturers advertising idle battery time as 800-1000 hours or some other hogwash number. They run those battery tests in their labs in unrealistic conditions that does not resemble real life usage even remotely just to pump up the score. That, in my opinion, is more "cheating" to the consumer than propping the CPU before a benchmark.
What I get from this:
If we rename our favorite apps to "Geekbench" we'll get better performance?
xManMythLegend said:
Benchmarks matter. They are the quickest least subjective way to compare power between phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes and no. And it depends on whether the benchmark is an emulator (talking directly to the h/w) or using the phone's native code and drivers. Since we're on car analogies it's more like bench horsepower (talking directly to the h/w) and horsepower to the wheels (using native code). There are a ton of devices out there that get fantastic benchmarks (they should if they use the same SoC) but crater based on the OEM doing a ****ty job with s/w and drivers.
And if you look at S-800 over S-600 the worst S-800 benchmark is light years ahead of the best S-600. It still comes down to how a device does the things that you ask it to based on your unique apps and settings configuration. I guarantee you my N3 running 113 apps with 9 syncs going all the time isn't going to "feel" as fast as someone else's running "lean" to maximize performance.
Hello!
I got my eyes on this phone for a while now, and I'm finally set to buy it.
I have been using Xperia XZ for two years and I love it, but the throttling is very bad on this phone.
I read that the XZ Premium does not have any throttling whatsoever. I couldn't find any video or picture of users using a Throttling Test App.
So what I want is someone who has a XZ Premium (not rooted) to download the CPU Throttling Test and take a snapshot or a video of the screen after 10~15 minutes of the test.
That would help me decide to buy it on the spot.
Thank you very much!
It seems it does throttle, with the CPU speed on the higher cores dropping from 2.36GHz to 2GHz. This is with a year old XZP, tested with charger off, and a thick Spigen case on.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
However, in terms of actual every day use, I don't see any slow down at all, even with gaming. Is there a reason why you need a phone that doesn't throttle?
Mostly just for everyday gaming like MOBAs.
But, throttling from 2.3 to 2.0 is almost nothing (I think?)
The Xperia XZ goes from 2.1 to 1.1. That's a lot and the phone lags, the fps on games gets really low, and gets way to hot to handle on a 25 min. MOBA game.
That looked pretty good! I Think I will get this phone!
Thank you for your response!
There are also more results on youtube regarding the cpu throttling for sd845 phones.
Kreens said:
Hello!
I got my eyes on this phone for a while now, and I'm finally set to buy it.
I have been using Xperia XZ for two years and I love it, but the throttling is very bad on this phone.
I read that the XZ Premium does not have any throttling whatsoever. I couldn't find any video or picture of users using a Throttling Test App.
So what I want is someone who has a XZ Premium (not rooted) to download the CPU Throttling Test and take a snapshot or a video of the screen after 10~15 minutes of the test.
That would help me decide to buy it on the spot.
Thank you very much!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dude I dont trust these softwares that check cpu throtteling,
all I know is real action, if I can feel a stutter then I call that cpu throtteling like crazy
but this phone man, its crazy fast, no lags, crazy smooth I mean I dont ever think of buying a newer phone after this, its just mad in terms of speed it can still beat S9's and Note 9's and oneplus's
and its a year old with me.
keep in mind, that is on the screen resolution out of the box, if you wanna do like me (who really loves CRISP quality) and use the "4k all the time" mod, it will not feel as smooth as on 1080p but to me its really worth it because it still doesnt lag at least not something to be conciderablly noticeable, but if youre not obsessed with 4k screens and keep it on 1080, I dont think there is a better device than this one, not even the ones with snapdragon 845 even if there is a faster phone, that extra speed wouldnt make a huge difference in my opinion..
umbra-xda said:
There are also more results on youtube regarding the cpu throttling for sd845 phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HI! This phone (XZ Premium) is SD835 friend.
madshark2009 said:
dude I dont trust these softwares that check cpu throtteling,
all I know is real action, if I can feel a stutter then I call that cpu throtteling like crazy
but this phone man, its crazy fast, no lags, crazy smooth I mean I dont ever think of buying a newer phone after this, its just mad in terms of speed it can still beat S9's and Note 9's and oneplus's
and its a year old with me.
keep in mind, that is on the screen resolution out of the box, if you wanna do like me (who really loves CRISP quality) and use the "4k all the time" mod, it will not feel as smooth as on 1080p but to me its really worth it because it still doesnt lag at least not something to be conciderablly noticeable, but if youre not obsessed with 4k screens and keep it on 1080, I dont think there is a better device than this one, not even the ones with snapdragon 845 even if there is a faster phone, that extra speed wouldnt make a huge difference in my opinion..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I feel you! That's why I feel in love with this phone. I see that almost nobody complains about speed, lag or stuttering. I already ordered one! I can't wait to get my hands on it!
Kreens said:
I feel you! That's why I feel in love with this phone. I see that almost nobody complains about speed, lag or stuttering. I already ordered one! I can't wait to get my hands on it!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
congrats bro! enjoy your not toy
Hi, does anybody have a legit/real life information regarding the real refresh rate in S22u?
Does it go down all the way to advertised 1 Hz? I've seen some scraps of info stating that it's only capable of 24 Hz.
*pre-order confusion intestifies*
refresh rate for s22u hasn't changed from originally advertised. for more info see
Samsung attempts to explain Galaxy S22 screen refresh-rate shenanigans
Trying to cut through the jargon
www.androidpolice.com
raul6 said:
refresh rate for s22u hasn't changed from originally advertised. for more info see
Samsung attempts to explain Galaxy S22 screen refresh-rate shenanigans
Trying to cut through the jargon
www.androidpolice.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the reply. I've seen the official, updated statements regarding S22/S22+ refresh rates but I was wondering whether someone is already using the S22u and can check/ report how it works IRL.
For instance IceUniverse Claimed it's only going down to 24 Hz - see below
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Cheers!
xdocent said:
Thanks for the reply. I've seen the official, updated statements regarding S22/S22+ refresh rates but I was wondering whether someone is already using the S22u and can check/ report how it works IRL.
For instance IceUniverse Claimed it's only going down to 24 Hz - see belowView attachment 5538083
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm thinking the 1hz is reserved for special scenarios? idk how this all works but I highly doubt they'd lie about that. People were all saying Samsung lied and that it only goes down to 48hz... obviously that was fake news.
eaoosa said:
I'm thinking the 1hz is reserved for special scenarios? idk how this all works but I highly doubt they'd lie about that. People were all saying Samsung lied and that it only goes down to 48hz... obviously that was fake news.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It sound really plausible that 1 Hz is used only in certain circumstances e.g. AOD. Which is why I decided to ask if some of early users/testers are here with us on the forum and could try it out
They said s21 ultra would go down to 10hz and it only went as low as 48hz so I’d expect same old bs
russellcausier said:
They said s21 ultra would go down to 10hz and it only went as low as 48hz so I’d expect same old bs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently the hype train is derailing as first users report glitchy, buggy software, and disappointing performance including the refresh rate(24 Hzvs declared 1 Hz) and SOT.
The question tho is whether they can fix it with incoming updates.
At the moment I'm seriously considering cancelation of the pre-order and sticking to current n20u
xdocent said:
Apparently the hype train is derailing as first users report glitchy, buggy software, and disappointing performance including the refresh rate(24 Hzvs declared 1 Hz) and SOT.
The question tho is whether they can fix it with incoming updates.
At the moment I'm seriously considering cancelation of the pre-order and sticking to current n20u
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cancel it! If you are already trying to find fault with it then why bother.
The 1 HZ has to be a static screen so that means no notification bar, nothing that is being updated in the background. So a photo in full screen would probably reach the 1 Hz that you seem so hung up on.
You're talking about spending £1200 on a phone and the killer feature that it claims reaches 1 Hz.
Why do you seem so upset that he's upset. Let the man have his opinion
Ice universe claimed the s22+ can go down to 24hz not the rumored 48hz that was going around. Read the tweet you posted. He clearly says s22+. The ultra goes down to 1hz like Samsung says but no one has actually tested it to see what scenario makes it go down that far. There’s no reason to believe Samsung is lying until someone can prove they are lying.
xdocent said:
Thanks for the reply. I've seen the official, updated statements regarding S22/S22+ refresh rates but I was wondering whether someone is already using the S22u and can check/ report how it works IRL.
For instance IceUniverse Claimed it's only going down to 24 Hz - see belowView attachment 5538083
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is not claiming the ultra goes to only 24hz. He says atleast the + can go to 24hz because of the previous rumor that it can only go down to 48hz. He’s just showing the ultra for comparison.
I've shown the tweet from IceUniverse, because it was one of the first legit source I could find. It's not that I'm obssed with the 1 Hz, it's just that I don't like to be lied. Since there's a discrepancy between the claims and actual state in S22/S22+ it was sheer curiousity to check how's like in S22U
So far first users' opinions are not favorable but perhaps upcoming updates might fix few of these juvenile problems.
It's a shame tho that Samsung releases "undercooked" product. As far as I am concerned I'd rather get it a bit later on but in flawless condition than trying to get rid of nasty first impressions.
Anyways, I'm patiently waiting for my device to come and try it out myself.
xdocent said:
I've shown the tweet from IceUniverse, because it was one of the first legit source I could find. It's not that I'm obssed with the 1 Hz, it's just that I don't like to be lied. Since there's a discrepancy between the claims and actual state in S22/S22+ it was sheer curiousity to check how's like in S22U
So far first users' opinions are not favorable but perhaps upcoming updates might fix few of these juvenile problems.
It's a shame tho that Samsung releases "undercooked" product. As far as I am concerned I'd rather get it a bit later on but in flawless condition than trying to get rid of nasty first impressions.
Anyways, I'm patiently waiting for my device to come and try it out myself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is it under cooked? Do you have a source saying it doesn’t do what is claimed? They aren’t even the same phone spec wise. The ultra uses a completely different panel technology from the +. Seems like you are jumping to conclusions.
freebee269 said:
How is it under cooked? Do you have a source saying it doesn’t do what is claimed? They aren’t even the same phone spec wise. The ultra uses a completely different panel technology from the +. Seems like you are jumping to conclusions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what I meant by under cooked.
Screen glitch
I noticed that unlocking screen with fingerprint with display set up in wqhd, natural and adaptive mode, produces this glitch : , anyone noticed the same? I have exynos version.
forum.xda-developers.com
S22 Ultra Very Laggy and slow
I got my new S22 Ultra this monday and I have been having quite a lot of problems with it. The battery life is terrible, only around 2-3 hours of lite use. Snapchat is near unusable because it is terribly slow and laggy to use and the viewport...
forum.xda-developers.com
My device is scheduled to be shipped 25/02 and then I can add few words about stability, SOT and other reported problems. So far my opinions are only based on early users' posts.
@freebee269 You might be right, extrapolating from s22/s22+ is propably inappropriate in this case.
Cheers
freebee269 said:
How is it under cooked? Do you have a source saying it doesn’t do what is claimed? They aren’t even the same phone spec wise. The ultra uses a completely different panel technology from the +. Seems like you are jumping to conclusions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I received mine and I can confirm that my first impressions are not good, especially on the battery. But this can be fixed with updates.
SamFR said:
I received mine and I can confirm that my first impressions are not good, especially on the battery. But this can be fixed with updates.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry to hear that. Hopefully my first impression isn’t the same. I don’t get mine until Thursday or Friday
Got mine s22ultra 12/256 exy 2 days ago. As stated before by other users it goes down to 24 Hz and can be forced to 10 Hz by GalaxyHz.
I got my new S22 Ultra this monday and I have been having quite a lot of problems with it.
The battery life is terrible, only around 2-3 hours of lite use. Snapchat is near unusable because it is terribly slow and laggy to use and the viewport in the app has a delay of 2-3 sec.
No software updates has come out, and no app update has fixed it.
Any suggestions of how to fix this?
Yeah, sure. 1 post.
eaoosa said:
Yeah, sure. 1 post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What?
eaoosa said:
Yeah, sure. 1 post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everyone has to start at post #1.
EmilZackrisson said:
I got my new S22 Ultra this monday and I have been having quite a lot of problems with it.
The battery life is terrible, only around 2-3 hours of lite use. Snapchat is near unusable because it is terribly slow and laggy to use and the viewport in the app has a delay of 2-3 sec.
No software updates has come out, and no app update has fixed it.
Any suggestions of how to fix this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you start with a clean installation or did you transfer previous data from anothe phone?
hand-filer said:
Did you start with a clean installation or did you transfer previous data from anothe phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did a new install, I have tried to do a factory reset but no luck.
EmilZackrisson said:
I did a new install, I have tried to do a factory reset but no luck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably got a lemon
Now that the S22 Ultra is in users hands we're seeing big differences between what Samsung has touted and actual performance. Charging times aren't much better at 45W. 1 hour, 3 minutes at 45W for full charge compared to 1 hour, 6 minutes at 25W. Barely any advantage. Also, the S22 Ultra doesn't come with a charger. A 45W Charger will cost around $35 USD.
Even worse, tests reflect a big difference in battery life. The S22 Ultra drained after 8 hours, 50 minutes whereas the S21 Ultra lasted 11 hours, 25 minutes. The S22 Ultra may improve over time with an Adaptive Battery but if it doesn't improve much this is a big issue. The S22 Ultra is looking less and less like an upgrade.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra review: Reintroducing the Galaxy Note
It's Samsung's most popular new phone for a reason.
www.androidcentral.com
EmilZackrisson said:
I got my new S22 Ultra this monday and I have been having quite a lot of problems with it.
The battery life is terrible, only around 2-3 hours of lite use. Snapchat is near unusable because it is terribly slow and laggy to use and the viewport in the app has a delay of 2-3 sec.
No software updates has come out, and no app update has fixed it.
Any suggestions of how to fix this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you show us some video clips how slow and laggy it is?
I think we are forgetting the basics of threads like this one:
Which exact model are you using?
Software version, build number, etc..
That kinda helps other users see if they have similar issues on the same device or if it's limited to specific regions..
I been seeing some tests done on various sites showing that the S22 Ultra Exynos version is very similar to the s21 Ultra in terms of bench scores. Battery Life is worse than the S21 Ultra and of course the Snap Dragon version is faster as it has been in the past. But don't take my word for it do a search on Google. The results are there. Glad the U.S. version is the Snap Dragon. But still not fair to those getting stuck with the Exynos version. This was a big problem with the S20 Ultra Exynos version as well.
Keep in mind that Samsung launched a new 45w charger, the previous one had issues with thermals. The model number for the new one is EP-T4510XBEGGB.
EmilZackrisson said:
I got my new S22 Ultra this monday and I have been having quite a lot of problems with it.
The battery life is terrible, only around 2-3 hours of lite use. Snapchat is near unusable because it is terribly slow and laggy to use and the viewport in the app has a delay of 2-3 sec.
No software updates has come out, and no app update has fixed it.
Any suggestions of how to fix this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got my s22 ultra yesterday and I can confirm this. Ita super laggy not just in snapchay but everywhere i feel like, just closing apps can freeze it. I used 91% of my battery in 3,5 hours with 1080p on and half the brightness. Gets warm quikly. Snapchat is super laggy, but pics and videoes is good and it feels like im on the camera app, it uses ai for example when i take 100x pictures through snapchat to make it clearer. But my god it also feels like my screen is like 20fps, its so laggy..
joancolmenares said:
I think we are forgetting the basics of threads like this one:
Which exact model are you using?
Software version, build number, etc..
That kinda helps other users see if they have similar issues on the same device or if it's limited to specific regions..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
EmilZackrisson said:
View attachment 5540331
View attachment 5540333
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ser du er norsk, add kristofferown på snap, har samme problemene som deg as
donkeyman1234 said:
Can you show us some video clips how slow and laggy it is?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, the worst lag is inside of snapchat and I am not comfortable sharing that.
Outside of snapchat it is randomly dropping frames and going to the homescreen and switching apps are slow and quite hard sometimes. The gesturebar is moving and goes back to it's original location and I'm stuck in the app. The battery has gotten better with the adaptive battery learning but it's still not great, but not terrible either.
Faplord said:
Ser du er norsk, add kristofferown på snap, har samme problemene som deg as
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I'm from Sweden.
Faplord said:
Got my s22 ultra yesterday and I can confirm this. Ita super laggy not just in snapchay but everywhere i feel like, just closing apps can freeze it. I used 91% of my battery in 3,5 hours with 1080p on and half the brightness. Gets warm quikly. Snapchat is super laggy, but pics and videoes is good and it feels like im on the camera app, it uses ai for example when i take 100x pictures through snapchat to make it clearer. But my god it also feels like my screen is like 20fps, its so laggy..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Might you be the same person? First message and complaining.
1 said:
Might you be the same person? First message and complaining.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No im new to this platform but I have googled so much now and this guy is mentioning everything the same as it is with mine
1 said:
Might you be the same person? First message and complaining.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would I? I like the phone, had a S20 Ultra when it came out and switched to the iPhone 12 Pro last year, found out it aren't the right phone for me so I went back and pre-orderd the s22 ultra. I like the phone but I had a problem so I just went here to ask you guys. No need to be toxic.
Its been few months since relase and tons of updates, but still, no updates for the camera. How is that possible?
I remember, that S21 Ultra got plenty of camera updates straight out of the box. There was neither one camera update for our S22 Ultra.
Do you think its still coming or we should accept camera as it is ?
If you haven't noticed updates can and do break things. Do you have specific issues?
Invariably Samsung will issues updates for the cam. Unless there's a gross firmware issue(s) the improvements may be more superficial and likely not greatly increase performance.
The more that Samsung seems to emphasize their phone's cam performance, the greater the overall decline in their product. Sammy is drowning in their own hype marketing bs. 2 years straight of not hitting the mark with their flagship phones in my opinion.
This N10+ in my hand isn't small or light but the S22U is bigger, heavier, thicker with a worse display/bevel ratio.
Worse, no expandable storage, SOT isn't better, spen on the wrong side again, in actual usage only barely faster and that all goes to pieces once the ram loads up. Now there are reports of cam issues coming out that appear to be with the optics of the N22U.
Updates will fix some of these issues but not most. Samsung, innovative ball dropping.
OPOmaniac said:
Its been few months since relase and tons of updates, but still, no updates for the camera. How is that possible?
I remember, that S21 Ultra got plenty of camera updates straight out of the box. There was neither one camera update for our S22 Ultra.
Do you think its still coming or we should accept camera as it is ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What specific issues are you having with the camera? I haven't experienced any problems with taking quality photos. I don't think there is a need for updates unless there are known issues.
blackhawk said:
If you haven't noticed updates can and do break things. Do you have specific issues?
Invariably Samsung will issues updates for the cam. Unless there's a gross firmware issue(s) the improvements may be more superficial and likely not greatly increase performance.
The more that Samsung seems to emphasize their phone's cam performance, the greater the overall decline in their product. Sammy is drowning in their own hype marketing bs. 2 years straight of not hitting the mark with their flagship phones in my opinion.
This N10+ in my hand isn't small or light but the S22U is bigger, heavier, thicker with a worse display/bevel ratio.
Worse, no expandable storage, SOT isn't better, spen on the wrong side again, in actual usage only barely faster and that all goes to pieces once the ram loads up. Now there are reports of cam issues coming out that appear to be with the optics of the N22U.
Updates will fix some of these issues but not most. Samsung, innovative ball dropping.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This Blackhawk character has been on Note 10's d**k since it dropped and has spammed literally hundreds of threads, where he's just ****ting on every subsequent Samsung release. I think we should get a fundraiser together to get him a new phone. I feel like he can't afford a new one and needs his self worth validated by claiming the Note 10 as the only viable Samsung phone out there It's quiet sad and comical at the same time at this point honestly.
AeroSatan said:
This Blackhawk character has been on Note 10's d**k since it dropped and has spammed literally hundreds of threads, where he's just ****ting on every subsequent Samsung release. I think we should get a fundraiser together to get him a new phone. I feel like he can't afford a new one and needs his self worth validated by claiming the Note 10 as the only viable Samsung phone out there It's quiet sad and comical at the same time at this point honestly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly! I called him out a while back and the moderators deleted my response and basically said dont feed the troll.
Yet they do nothing to stop the trolling. I come here to participate on a forum about my phone and every day the troll with the annoying avatar shows up espousing the virtues of his N10+ and how superior it is to anything else. He's not the only one either but he's certanly the most annoying.
hand-filer said:
Exactly! I called him out a while back and the moderators deleted my response and basically said dont feed the troll.
Yet they do nothing to stop the trolling. I come here to participate on a forum about my phone and every day the troll with the annoying avatar shows up espousing the virtues of his N10+ and how superior it is to anything else. He's not the only one either but he's certanly the most annoying.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At least they've acknowledged him as the troll that he is. Baby steps.
AeroSatan said:
At least they've acknowledged him as the troll that he is. Baby steps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He isn't always wrong. I'm mean, a broken clock is right twice a day. Right?
hand-filer said:
View attachment 5611059
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It has issues (towards end of vid)... and so does Android 11 and 12.
Members are posting a crappy blur pattern when trying to simply make a copy of a letter with it too. We'll see what's up when the updates and the dust settles. Regardless it's not not getting a better form factor, any lighter or any more memory. It can never boast a 1.5 tb dual drive or have the advantages that confers.
Actually I did get a new phone half year ago
To be frank I'm napalming Samsung for screwing up again. No token trophies.
gernerttl said:
He isn't always wrong. I'm mean, a broken clock is right twice a day. Right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
More like a broken record? One that keeps playing the same verse over and over again.