Database Info

[Q] Which kernel should I get for MIUI 1.9.30?

And also, I was wondering if there was a way of getting the newest MIUI version without re-flashing, wiping and factory reset and that stuff, I really don't feel like starting off new again. So again what are your suggestions for kernels, I kinda like the idea of over clocking, but it isn't a necessity.

I am using the latest franco kernel on ideos x5 , i´m having some ocasional reebots . But he already said he would fix it , for what i know its a good kernel to use.

Franco's hands down.If you have any probs raise the voltages.
u8800,cm7,[email protected]

PlanDreaM said:
Franco's hands down.If you have any probs raise the voltages.
u8800,cm7,[email protected]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where do I get this kernel, and I assume it can be used with MIUI 1.9.30? Also I forgot to mention I have a Samsung Infuse 4g, can I still get franco's kernel?

[Q] change from CM11 to FRANCO KERNEL

Hello community,
I am a rookie in the subject of kernels/roms and I would love to have some precious help from any1 that knows even the smallest of information. I recently installed CM kernel and CM nightly 0422. The thing is, I read in many forums (in here as well) that there is a kernel that can boost battery life to its max, Franco Kernel. But I also read that it is somehow incompatible with CM 10+ and causes bootloop if you install it with CM already in phone. What I can't understand is why can't I just simply replace CM kernel (like stock kernel was replaced by CM kernel) by Franco Kernel? What is the fact that I am missing?
ALL (and I mean ALL) help will be highly appreaciated, thanks for your time
T.

f33d_me_plz said:
Hello community,
I am a rookie in the subject of kernels/roms and I would love to have some precious help from any1 that knows even the smallest of information. I recently installed CM kernel and CM nightly 0422. The thing is, I read in many forums (in here as well) that there is a kernel that can boost battery life to its max, Franco Kernel. But I also read that it is somehow incompatible with CM 10+ and causes bootloop if you install it with CM already in phone. What I can't understand is why can't I just simply replace CM kernel (like stock kernel was replaced by CM kernel) by Franco Kernel? What is the fact that I am missing?
ALL (and I mean ALL) help will be highly appreaciated, thanks for your time
T.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
first off.. there is no magic pill to give your phone for battery life. battery life mostly depends on your personal usage, your personal setup, your apps used, and most importantly the quality of your phone/data connection. everything else is minor for battery life, including kernels.
cm uses CAF as its base now, they went away from aosp(like most kernels here). so everything that is aosp based is not compatible with cm anymore. franco kernel is aosp based(most kernels are). there are a few kernels that are CAF based built just for cm and cm based roms.

simms22 said:
first off.. there is no magic pill to give your phone for battery life. battery life mostly depends on your personal usage, your personal setup, your apps used, and most importantly the quality of your phone/data connection. everything else is minor for battery life, including kernels.
cm uses CAF as its base now, they went away from aosp(like most kernels here). so everything that is aosp based is not compatible with cm anymore. franco kernel is aosp based(most kernels are). there are a few kernels that are CAF based built just for cm and cm based roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your time and your answer
First of all, I know for myself that there is no magic pill about battery life, I just read in too many threads that FK added a good portion of battery life (with same use of phone like when it had CM) ! Moreover it allows you to overclock (my) Nexus5 beyond 2.2GHz, something that CM doesn't allow you too (I know that overclocking kills battery, I just want to test something). What I don't understand is how can FK mess up with CM when both are different kernels and by installing FK over CM means that FK replaces CM. There is no CM in the end, only FK. Or not...? What have I understood wrong?
Thanks again

f33d_me_plz said:
Thanks for your time and your answer
First of all, I know for myself that there is no magic pill about battery life, I just read in too many threads that FK added a good portion of battery life (with same use of phone like when it had CM) ! Moreover it allows you to overclock (my) Nexus5 beyond 2.2GHz, something that CM doesn't allow you too (I know that overclocking kills battery, I just want to test something). What I don't understand is how can FK mess up with CM when both are different kernels and by installing FK over CM means that FK replaces CM. There is no CM in the end, only FK. Or not...? What have I understood wrong?
Thanks again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, franco would replace cm kernel if all worked right. but what you are doing is replacing cm kernel with franco kernel, but cm rom stays on your phone. franco kernel is incompatible with cm rom. since franco is aosp and cm is caf, your phone would never boot up all the way.

simms22 said:
yes, franco would replace cm kernel if all worked right. but what you are doing is replacing cm kernel with franco kernel, but cm rom stays on your phone. franco kernel is incompatible with cm rom. since franco is aosp and cm is caf, your phone would never boot up all the way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, if I am getting your point right, since one is aosp and the other is caf THAT is the reason why CM doesn't uninstall and will exist together with franco? Is there a way to permanently delete CM in order to install franco? Maybe to go back to stock kernel then install FK?

f33d_me_plz said:
So, if I am getting your point right, since one is aosp and the other is caf THAT is the reason why CM doesn't uninstall and will exist together with franco? Is there a way to permanently delete CM in order to install franco? Maybe to go back to stock kernel then install FK?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its not about the kernel, its about the rom. they are different things. when you flash a kernel(any), it replaces the kernel thats on your phone(kernels come with roms, cm kernel with cm rom). cm rom includes cm kernel, both are built from caf source. franco kernel is aosp, it is not compatible with cm rom. it has nothing to do with cm kernel, it replaces cm kernel when flashed. but you will never boot up your phone because it isnt compatible with cm rom.

simms22 said:
its not about the kernel, its about the rom. they are different things. when you flash a kernel(any), it replaces the kernel thats on your phone(kernels come with roms, cm kernel with cm rom). cm rom includes cm kernel, both are built from caf source. franco kernel is aosp, it is not compatible with cm rom. it has nothing to do with cm kernel, it replaces cm kernel when flashed. but you will never boot up your phone because it isnt compatible with cm rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, finally I got it, thanks to you Last question... is there a way to get FK now or am I just locked to caf due to CM "for life"? which way (if there is any at all) in your opinion is the best way to go from CM to FK? maybe go back to stock rom/kernel then flash FK? Will this work?

f33d_me_plz said:
ok, finally I got it, thanks to you Last question... is there a way to get FK now or am I just locked to caf due to CM "for life"? which way (if there is any at all) in your opinion is the best way to go from CM to FK? maybe go back to stock rom/kernel then flash FK? Will this work?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no, they arent compatible at all. you can not use franco kernel with any cm based roms. you can change roms and use franco kernel with it, any aosp rom or even the stock rom. but cm isnt compatible at all with franko kernel.

simms22 said:
no, they arent compatible at all. you can not use franco kernel with any cm based roms. you can change roms and use franco kernel with it, any aosp rom or even the stock rom. but cm isnt compatible at all with franko kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks man !!

f33d_me_plz said:
Thanks man !!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If your looking for a good CAF kernel to run with a PAC or CM based ROM. I'd recommend the ElementalX CAF kernel. It's very stable, rich features, great performance and great battery life. Make sure to read the OP for directions and if you decide to try it out download the ElementalX R38 version with the aromma installer (not the express version) As with running any new kernel run it for a few days minimum to allow for it by on settle in.
There is another option for you to explore too - http://forum.xda-developers.com/google-nexus-5/development/cm11-users-heres-how-aospnon-caf-t2626961
This allows you to run a script that will basically De-CAF your rom and allow you to run a AOSP kernel on CM11ROMs.. Be sure to read the OP. It works with many CM11 and CM based ROMs, but not on all the newest versions. Definitely worth checking out.

xdrc45 said:
If your looking for a good CAF kernel to run with a PAC or CM based ROM. I'd recommend the ElementalX CAF kernel. It's very stable, rich features, great performance and great battery life. Make sure to read the OP for directions and if you decide to try it out download the ElementalX R38 version with the aromma installer (not the express version) As with running any new kernel run it for a few days minimum to allow for it by on settle in.
There is another option for you to explore too - http://forum.xda-developers.com/google-nexus-5/development/cm11-users-heres-how-aospnon-caf-t2626961
This allows you to run a script that will basically De-CAF your rom and allow you to run a AOSP kernel on CM11ROMs.. Be sure to read the OP. It works with many CM11 and CM based ROMs, but not on all the newest versions. Definitely worth checking out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your interest and time! I will sure check both your ROM and the De-CAF script soon and post my opinion/experience ! For newbies like me that are reading this post, here is a quite enbrightening thread about CAF and qualcomm processors (although it's Reddit, it's quite explanatory).
Peace!
T.

f33d_me_plz said:
Thanks for your interest and time! I will sure check both your ROM and the De-CAF script soon and post my opinion/experience ! For newbies like me that are reading this post, here is a quite enbrightening thread about CAF and qualcomm processors (although it's Reddit, it's quite explanatory).
Peace!
T.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, I forgot to paste the link cheers ! http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/1rt9md/eli5_what_is_caf_why_is_cm_going_caf_affects_the/

[Q] Is Mahdi-Rom AOSP or CM (CAF) based?

Is Mahdi-Rom AOSP or CM (CAF) based?
I've been researching of this for the whole night last night but keep on finding mixed answer.
and now I'm hoping for you guys to answer me...i wanted to install elemental x but don't know which version to install aosp or cm
and will franco kernel be comparable since its for aosp?
Thanks soooo much to who ever answer this...!

matthewle96 said:
Is Mahdi-Rom AOSP or CM (CAF) based?
I've been researching of this for the whole night last night but keep on finding mixed answer.
and now I'm hoping for you guys to answer me...i wanted to install elemental x but don't know which version to install aosp or cm
and will franco kernel be comparable since its for aosp?
Thanks soooo much to who ever answer this...!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its AOSP with CAF stuff in it. Just flash one and if it doesn't boot reflash the ROM and flash the other.

Thanks
Lethargy said:
Its AOSP with CAF stuff in it. Just flash one and if it doesn't boot reflash the ROM and flash the other.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so just to make sure that franco is FULLY comparable with this rom?

matthewle96 said:
so just to make sure that franco is FULLY comparable with this rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Make a backup, flash. If it doesn't boot then it isn't compatible.

matthewle96 said:
so just to make sure that franco is FULLY comparable with this rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
make a backup in recovery and just flash the darn kernel. if its not compatible, it wont boot. then you can either flash a known booting kernel or restore the backup you made in recovery. that's the quickest way to find your answer.

simms22 said:
make a backup in recovery and just flash the darn kernel. if its not compatible, it wont boot. then you can either flash a known booting kernel or restore the backup you made in recovery. that's the quickest way to find your answer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks

Haha this really is a good question though. I myself didn't know either. I had been under the impression it was full AOSP.
Last time I ran Franco kernel on it though all was fine.
Sent from Tapatalk on Nexus 5

TheLastSidekick said:
Haha this really is a good question though. I myself didn't know either. I had been under the impression it was full AOSP.
Last time I ran Franco kernel on it though all was fine.
Sent from Tapatalk on Nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quite a few ROMs say AOSP but have CAF parts lol. Rarely are ROMs full CAF though, the only one that I know of is CM of course. Some AOSP kernels work with hybrids and some only do after modification.
An AOSP Dalvik will only boot up on full AOSP ROMs so it the Z2 Dalvik boots, it's full AOSP. If a CAF Dalvik boots, it's either hybrid or full. Nice way to tell

Lethargy said:
Quite a few ROMs say AOSP but have CAF parts lol. Rarely are ROMs full CAF though, the only one that I know of is CM of course. Some AOSP kernels work with hybrids and some only do after modification.
An AOSP Dalvik will only boot up on full AOSP ROMs so it the Z2 Dalvik boots, it's full AOSP. If a CAF Dalvik boots, it's either hybrid or full. Nice way to tell
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah thanks. I never really messed with the custom dalvik because I didn't see anything other benchmark gains.
Sent from Tapatalk on Nexus 5

TheLastSidekick said:
Ah thanks. I never really messed with the custom dalvik because I didn't see anything other benchmark gains.
Sent from Tapatalk on Nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some people say general usage is slightly better, some say it doesn't help in general ui. Experience varies. Lol.

I ran mahdi rom for a long time use aosp kernel caf will not boot

Franco Kernel on OPO?
Any update on whether Franco Kernel is compatible with this CM based Mahdi rom on the OnePlus One?

how to check which version of Kernel I'm using?

Hello guys,
I'm new to Nexus 5 as well.
I have been using Chroma for few months now/
http://forum.xda-developers.com/google-nexus-5/development/rom-chroma-03-31-2015-layers-t3069105
The version I installed on mine is: 8-10-2015 built.
I have been following the post lately,
many people said, 'franco.Kernel' is a good Kernel.
how do I check if I already have franco kernel installed?
I went to About page, it says: 3.4.0-gbebb36b [email protected]#1
also,
if I want to go with franco kernel, what advantages will i get?
do i just need to download this app thru google play to install the franco kernel?
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.franco.kernel.free

mrprince123 said:
Hello guys,
I'm new to Nexus 5 as well.
I have been using Chroma for few months now/
http://forum.xda-developers.com/google-nexus-5/development/rom-chroma-03-31-2015-layers-t3069105
The version I installed on mine is: 8-10-2015 built.
I have been following the post lately,
many people said, 'franco.Kernel' is a good Kernel.
how do I check if I already have franco kernel installed?
I went to About page, it says: 3.4.0-gbebb36b [email protected]#1
also,
if I want to go with franco kernel, what advantages will i get?
do i just need to download this app thru google play to install the franco kernel?
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.franco.kernel.free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is stock kernel. Recommend using blu_spark (aka code_blue) over franco.kernel. I won't say FK is abandoned, and it is a good kernel, but it's just not updated for the N5 much anymore. Same thing happened to the N7 2013. When the devs move on, you should also.
What do you get with a custom kernel? They say battery, performance, etc. Most of it is negligible at best. You'll need to read the kernel OPs.

hello,
thank you for your reply.
which kernal are you using for your nexus 5 right now?
Aerowinder said:
That is stock kernel. Recommend using blu_spark (aka code_blue) over franco.kernel. I won't say FK is abandoned, and it is a good kernel, but it's just not updated for the N5 much anymore. Same thing happened to the N7 2013. When the devs move on, you should also.
What do you get with a custom kernel? They say battery, performance, etc. Most of it is negligible at best. You'll need to read the kernel OPs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

I use elementalx. It is pretty much stock, but you can mod things. The dev's app is great, too.

mrprince123 said:
how do I check if I already have franco kernel installed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Chroma used Franco as the built-in kernel in the past but zephik keeps Google's kernel for a few months.
mrprince123 said:
if I want to go with franco kernel, what advantages will i get?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better battery life? Negligible.
New features like color control, governors (highest impact on battery life), S2W, DT2W, USB fast charge... It varies for each kernel.
mrprince123 said:
do i just need to download this app thru google play to install the franco kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suggest you to read (again & again) the kernel threads on XDA before flashing anything. Franco is a well known kernel but we have other awesome kernels.

so my nexus 5 is stuck on the bootloop or the chroma logo...
I flashed:
1) chroma_hammerhead-ota-2015-10-05.zip
2) tk_gapps-modular-nano-5.1.1-20150927-signed.zip
then the nexus 5 was able to boot fine, and I saw the phone already has SuperSU came with the Chroma ROM
3) I went ahead download the BusyBox, and installed
4) reboot to recovery , and flashed blu_spark_r30-6.0_hammerhead_40fbe53.zip
my phone is not stuck on the ChromaLogo .....
I have also tried,, on the step 3, I flashed without installing Busybox.. It's a no go either..
any help would be appreciated..
Thanks
Primokorn said:
Chroma used Franco as the built-in kernel in the past but zephik keeps Google's kernel for a few months.
Better battery life? Negligible.
New features like color control, governors (highest impact on battery life), S2W, DT2W, USB fast charge... It varies for each kernel.
I suggest you to read (again & again) the kernel threads on XDA before flashing anything. Franco is a well known kernel but we have other awesome kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

mrprince123 said:
so my nexus 5 is stuck on the bootloop or the chroma logo...
I flashed:
1) chroma_hammerhead-ota-2015-10-05.zip
2) tk_gapps-modular-nano-5.1.1-20150927-signed.zip
then the nexus 5 was able to boot fine, and I saw the phone already has SuperSU came with the Chroma ROM
3) I went ahead download the BusyBox, and installed
4) reboot to recovery , and flashed blu_spark_r30-6.0_hammerhead_40fbe53.zip
my phone is not stuck on the ChromaLogo .....
I have also tried,, on the step 3, I flashed without installing Busybox.. It's a no go either..
any help would be appreciated..
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is your mistake: blu_spark_r30-6.0_hammerhead_40fbe53.zip
This kernel version is for Marshmallow.

[KERNEL][NOUGAT] AKLU Kernel

Praise God! The AKLU kernel has arrived on the Galaxy Note Edge in the flavor of NOUGAT!
NOTE: I highly recommend turning off THERMAL CORE CONTROL! Use THERMAL TEMPERATURE THROTTLE instead. Thermal core control has been known to cause random reboots on this kernel before when gaming or during heavy use. You can use Kernel Adiutor to adjust these settings.
TBLTE AKLU KERNEL for AOKP 7.1.2!
MAY work for other LineageOS based roms, e.g., RR, PAC,AOKP, LineageOS, etc.
Download:
http://www.mediafire.com/file/pcownjeat1o2oub/AKLU-TBLTE-AOKP-N-20170427_kexec.zip
TBLTE AKLU KERNEL for SLIM 7.1.1!
MAY work for other AOSP based roms, e.g., OmniRom, LiquidDark, SlimRoms, AOSP, etc.
Download:
http://www.mediafire.com/file/cl0ahc00zmxcai2/AKLU-TBLTE-SLIM-N-20170224.zip
Logs and features:
Modified TBLTE kernel. Modified by the Alaskalinuxuser.
https://thealaskalinuxuser.wordpress.com
20170427
- Updated kernel to include kexec hardboot for MultiRom support.
20170316
-Update for OMS support.
20170217
- Fix WiFi hot spot error for Nougat.
- Overclocked the GPU from 600MHz to 633MHz
- Overclocked the CPU from 2649MHz to 2688MHz
- Added governors: Bioshock, Lionheart, Nightmare, Darkness
- Removed input boost, use cpu boost instead
- Added I/O schedulers: FIOPS, ZEN

I haven't loaded up AOKP yet but this kernel is working beautifully with RR and the data fix. You rock man.

JeremySS said:
I haven't loaded up AOKP yet but this kernel is working beautifully with RR and the data fix. You rock man.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JeremySS,
Thank you for the kind words!
In theory it should work with any nougat rom based on LineageOS, but I have not proved that personally. Thanks for confirming that for RR and providing the feedback!

AlaskaLinuxUser said:
JeremySS,
Thank you for the kind words!
In theory it should work with any nougat rom based on LineageOS, but I have not proved that personally. Thanks for confirming that for RR and providing the feedback!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do good work. Do you have a donate link?

JeremySS said:
You do good work. Do you have a donate link?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the thought, but I do not accept donations. I just tinker for fun, and have my own rewards. Besides, guys like @Mickey387 did all the heavy lifting, I just try to put the device trees and vendor blobs to good use, with a few edits here and there. Glad to know that my work is appreciated, though.

The slim 7 aklu kernel appears to be slightly unstable at this time. Please use with caution.
EDIT: Updated the kernel and fixed a few bugs that I missed in the first build. SHOULD be better now. Please turn off thermal core control for best performance!
Also, if you flashed superSU in Slim to root it, you need to flash the kernel, then immidiately flash superSU, then reboot.

AlaskaLinuxUser said:
The slim 7 aklu kernel appears to be slightly unstable at this time. Please use with caution.
EDIT: Updated the kernel and fixed a few bugs that I missed in the first build. SHOULD be better now. Please turn off thermal core control for best performance!
Also, if you flashed superSU in Slim to root it, you need to flash the kernel, then immidiately flash superSU, then reboot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi... help me pleeze make kernel fo me n915d. really I want to give him a second life on his rom
All works fine but no sim card
Imei and everything else is.
Now used ramkernel v5_n915d and note 7 port.
but I want to Aokp 7.1.1
Here's how to do kernel ram121
github.com/Ram121/RamKernel_N4/commit/360a66df3d38b298896bfd161a2db2812f7b1efa

Steem75 said:
Hi... help me pleeze make kernel fo me n915d. really I want to give him a second life on his rom
All works fine but no sim card
Imei and everything else is.
Now used ramkernel v5_n915d and note 7 port.
but I want to Aokp 7.1.1
Here's how to do kernel ram121
github.com/Ram121/RamKernel_N4/commit/360a66df3d38b298896bfd161a2db2812f7b1efa
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please compile kernel with this config....
I do not have now Linux,Mac_os
apq8084_sec_tblte_dcm_defconfig

Steem75 said:
Please compile kernel with this config....
I do not have now Linux,Mac_os
apq8084_sec_tblte_dcm_defconfig
here's another
apq8084_sec_tblte_dcm_defconfig
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Steem75,
I am sorry, but at this time I do not have the resources to help you.

AlaskaLinuxUser said:
Steem75,
I am sorry, but at this time I do not have the resources to help you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then help me with advice
I make zImage with gcc eabi 4.8. End only *****_DCM_Defconfig
Log -hastebin.com/gudipabona.coffeescript
but it is not boot my note edge . Maybe because I packed it in your boot.img?
Or because compiled with only one config?

Praise God! A new kernel update!
The AKLU kernel for the AOKP has been updated to include kexec hardboot for rmultirom support! See the OP for details!

I have noticed that many of these processors on the note4/edge are of a good bin.. Mine can run about 45mv off from stock.. Have you ever considered adding CPU Voltage control to help a bit with battery longivity? I do thank you for your excellent work, your rom's and kernels truly show that it is the programmer not the hardware that matters.... Godspeed....

afbcamaro said:
I have noticed that many of these processors on the note4/edge are of a good bin.. Mine can run about 45mv off from stock.. Have you ever considered adding CPU Voltage control to help a bit with battery longivity? I do thank you for your excellent work, your rom's and kernels truly show that it is the programmer not the hardware that matters.... Godspeed....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks afbcamero, those are kind words.
On my MM kernels I did implement UV, but the way I did it in MM fails to pass in the N kernel. Not because it doesn't work, but rather that new build standards don't allow it. With the recent birth of my son, I have not had time yet to go back to it and figure out what was wrong yet. Are you familiar with kernel work? You could look at my github and my kernel source, perhaps you could show me where I went wrong?
If I can get passed that, I can implement the UV again. I also have the same problem for GPU voltage control, which I used to put on my MM kernels as well.
Perhaps when life slows down a bit, I can look back into it.
Sent from my unknown using XDA-Developers Legacy app

Oh I see, i honestly never looked at the structure of Nougat kernels. Any time I want to implement a change somebody does it better and beats me to the punch.. I will look at it just in case I see something..
On another note, these things however fun (development) not being trully important, may your family be blessed by the big guy.

Thanks! I'm always open to ideas on kernel improvement.
Sent from my unknown using XDA-Developers Legacy app

sim card not detected
Im on RR (7.1.2 micky387 build) but when i flashed the kernel, sim card isnt detected...anybody got the same issue? Any fix for that?
N915f on 6.0.1 modem

Ricationarli said:
Im on RR (7.1.2 micky387 build) but when i flashed the kernel, sim card isnt detected...anybody got the same issue? Any fix for that?
N915f on 6.0.1 modem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could try the data fix zips in the 915t T-Mobile thread.
Sent from my LG-H811 using XDA-Developers Legacy app

AlaskaLinuxUser said:
You could try the data fix zips in the 915t T-Mobile thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried both, sadly didnt work

Ricationarli said:
Im on RR (7.1.2 micky387 build) but when i flashed the kernel, sim card isnt detected...anybody got the same issue? Any fix for that?
N915f on 6.0.1 modem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had the same issue. No fix by me.

+1
Sent from my SM-N930F using XDA-Developers Legacy app