Related
I just bought a Korean variant Galaxy S4, KT's SHV-E300K(32GB). As far as I know, this is somewhat rare variant because it's an Exynos-powered S4 with LTE support.
With 2-year contract, I just picked it up without paying any money at the shop. The device costs me 899,000 Won actually and it's approximately $809.55 as of today. Monthly bill from KT will be about $72+ for 30 months, I guess. The guy gave me toilet paper rolls, lol. It's official KT promotion merchandise. Also he promised the shop will provide 3rd party cover/case and the protective film when they get those accessories in stock.
It's pity that I can't test its LTE capability at the moment. Being Saturday, I couldn't activate my new S4 right away. The KT rep said my new S4 will be activated at 10AM in the morning, next Monday. For the weekend till Monday morning, my official phone would be my old iPhone 4.
Cause this is the 1st time for me to use Android device, I'm frankly in panic now. iOS and Android(maybe Touchwiz) are too much different. I think I will have a hard time to get myself accustomed to this Android device.
The device itself is pretty nice. It's so much lighter and thinner compared to my old iPhone 4. The display is just incredible. I have seen lots of S3 and Note 2 around but this phone's screen was just beyond my expectation.
I had purchased Samsung 64GB microSD card(SDXC Pro class 10) before I bought the phone. The 1st work I did was copying iTunes music library from my MBP to the microSD card. It took about 30+ GB already. What I figured out is Apple's bundle earbuds I bought after the launch of iPhone 5 is not fully compatible with S4. Though stop/play button works, volume control button doesn't.
Antutu score was 29108 at my 1st try. Oddly, every time I repeat the test the score keeps going down. I don't know why. Because this is a Korean variant, it has DMB antenna allowing me to watch some TV channels as well as audio-only channel like radios for free.
If you have any question, feel free to ask. Though I'm a newbie to Android.
(I don't know why I can't upload images. Maybe I'm too newbie to upload images, lol. I put some images on picture board of Korean site I frequent and used the hot links.)
-------------------
Benchmark Test Results/Scores
I'm not a professional device tester. Some scores below include what are from non-best condition like consecutive tests, non-airplane mode, other apps in execution, etc. Take that into consideration.
For screenshot images, check my replies in the thread.
Antutu benchmark v3.3 test : 29,108
SunSpider test Samsung stock browser : total 1026.3ms +/- 7.4%
SunSpider test Chrome browser : total 980.5ms +/- 4.6%
3DMark test Icestrom : 10,207
3DMark test Icestorm Extreme : 6,248
GLBenchmark 2.7 T-Rex HD offscreen 699 frames 12 fps
GLBenchmark 2.7 T-Rex HD onscreen 695 frames 12 fps
GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt HD offscreen 4853 frames 43 fps
GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt HD onscreen 4549* frames 40 fps
Fill rate offscreen 1158812800 texels/sec
Fill rate onscreen 1061263872 texels/sec
Triangle throughput: Textured offscreen 40577880 triangles/sec
Triangle throughput: Textured onscreen 77569432 triangles/sec
Vellamo HTML5 score 2025
Vellamo Metal score 1062
BaseMark X On-Screen score 9.221 FPS
BaseMark X Off-Screen score 8.898 FPS
Wow, 29108 score on Antutu is amazing.
That's ridiculously faster than the Snapdragon variant.
MaKTaiL said:
Wow, 29108 score on Antutu is amazing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it? I never cared about benchmark scores much before I started to consider buying new phone.
congratulation dude
so the Korean version runinng @1.6 too
Korean version is 1.8 octa...
The only downside is the carrier bloat and the yamaha audio codec
Guitarfreak26 said:
Korean version is 1.8 octa...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=40769632&postcount=4
Strange, was meant to be 1.8 on gsm arena
Seanambers said:
That's ridiculously faster than the Snapdragon variant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not "ridiculously" faster. This is the Snapdragon variant below.
Guitarfreak26 said:
Strange, was meant to be 1.8 on gsm arena
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was rumored as such before the actual release but it seems not. I attached the system info screenshots from Antutu app(I changed the language setting that you could read.)
can u please do Sunspider test
and
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...k.dmandroid.application&feature=search_result
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...EsImNvbS5nbGJlbmNobWFyay5nbGJlbmNobWFyazI3Il0.
(T-Rex HD on screen + T-Rex HD offscreen + Egypt HD onscreen and offscreen + fill rate onscreen and off screen + triangle throughout onscreen and offscreen )
if your device get hot, the score will go down.
yahyoh said:
can u please do Sunspider test
and
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...k.dmandroid.application&feature=search_result
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...EsImNvbS5nbGJlbmNobWFyay5nbGJlbmNobWFyazI3Il0.
(T-Rex HD on screen + T-Rex HD offscreen + Egypt HD onscreen and offscreen + fill rate onscreen and off screen + triangle throughout onscreen and offscreen )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did SunSpider test on default browser(Samsung) and Chrome. I'm not sure this is the test you wanted. Also, I've done 3DMarks test. Both Icestrom and Icestrom extreme. Check the attached images.
1st image - Sunspider test result on Samsung browser : total 1026.3ms +/- 7.4%
2nd image - Sunspider test result on Chrome browser : total 980.5ms +/- 4.6%
3rd image - 3DMark test Icestrom : 10207
4th image - 3DMark test Icestorm Extreme : 6248
I'll try the other test after cooling my device down to some degree, lol.
frensel said:
if your device get hot, the score will go down.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't know that the heat can affect the Antutu score. That was why the scores kept decreasing. Thanks you for letting me know!
I've done the GLBenchmark test.
GLBenchmark 2.7 T-Rex HD offscreen 699 frames 12 fps
GLBenchmark 2.7 T-Rex HD onscreen 695 frames 12 fps
GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt HD offscreen 4853 frames 43 fps
GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt HD onscreen 4549* frames 40 fps
Fill rate offscreen 1158812800 texels/sec
Fill rate onscreen 1061263872 texels/sec
Triangle throughput: Textured offscreen 40577880 triangles/sec
Triangle throughput: Textured onscreen 77569432 triangles/sec
procol said:
I've done the GLBenchmark test.
Fill rate offscreen 1158812800 texels/sec
Fill rate onscreen 1061263872 texels/sec
Triangle throughput: Textured offscreen 40577880 triangles/sec
Triangle throughput: Textured onscreen 77569432 triangles/sec
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the tests.
I think that something is not right with these numbers.
Either the firmware is still not optimized, or it's throttling for some reason.
http://gfxbench.com/compare.jsp?cols=2&D1=Samsung+GT-I9500+Galaxy+S4&D2=Apple+iPhone+5
If I compare against iPhone 5, the Triangle throughput is clearly so bad.
I don't know the explanation for this. But I think there is still some room for improvement with the low-level results.
---------- Post added at 02:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:50 AM ----------
procol said:
I did SunSpider test on default browser(Samsung) and Chrome. I'm not sure this is the test you wanted. Also, I've done 3DMarks test. Both Icestrom and Icestrom extreme. Check the attached images.
1st image - Sunspider test result on Samsung browser : total 1026.3ms +/- 7.4%
2nd image - Sunspider test result on Chrome browser : total 980.5ms +/- 4.6%
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The results looks much different from http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=40772427&postcount=10
Maybe the phone was throttling during the test.
@procol: hi, when you do some benchs, you should close all apps and go in planemode. No WiFi, GPS and so too.
3dmark is not so high in your example. My one reaches more then your S4, but it should be atm s4>one, cuz of driver.
Gesendet von meinem HTC One mit Tapatalk 2
Can you please post the Velamo benchmark results? For both, 3D y cpu. Try to keep the phone cold between tests, if gets hot, leave it a while.
Btw, toilet paper ftw lol
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
CLARiiON said:
Thanks for the tests.
I think that something is not right with these numbers.
Either the firmware is still not optimized, or it's throttling for some reason.
http://gfxbench.com/compare.jsp?cols=2&D1=Samsung+GT-I9500+Galaxy+S4&D2=Apple+iPhone+5
If I compare against iPhone 5, the Triangle throughput is clearly so bad.
I don't know the explanation for this. But I think there is still some room for improvement with the low-level results.
---------- Post added at 02:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:50 AM ----------
The results looks much different from http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=40772427&postcount=10
Maybe the phone was throttling during the test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe I'm not a good tester, haha. I think the other results will surface soon from the Korean variants.
RoachPapa said:
@procol: hi, when you do some benchs, you should close all apps and go in planemode. No WiFi, GPS and so too.
3dmark is not so high in your example. My one reaches more then your S4, but it should be atm s4>one, cuz of driver.
Gesendet von meinem HTC One mit Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, maybe that's another points I failed to catch maybe.
demlasjr said:
Can you please post the Velamo benchmark results? For both, 3D y cpu. Try to keep the phone cold between tests, if gets hot, leave it a while.
Btw, toilet paper ftw lol
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure I've done the test you spoke of exactly, but I attached the screenshot image. 2 tests from HTML 5 category wanted me to turn on wifi so I did it on. Yeah, toilet paper is really odd.
Vellamo HTML5 score 2025
Vellamo Metal score 1062
procol said:
Maybe I'm not a good tester, haha. I think the other results will surface soon from the Korean variants.
Hmm, maybe that's another points I failed to catch maybe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A small tip -- allow few mins between the tests to let the phone cool-off.
Maybe a reboot will also help between the tests.
Also try a BaseMark X test!
procol said:
It was rumored as such before the actual release but it seems not. I attached the system info screenshots from Antutu app(I changed the language setting that you could read.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Piece of advice : hide your IMEI number in those screenshots, that's something you don't want to show to everyone.
Of all the released devices so far this year/end of last year, the Mate 8 is the only one that I might consider buy even tho the price is a bit too high for the performance (no 4k recording, only 1080p display and Kirin...).
The only thing holding me back is the lack of AOSP ROMs. Do you guys think there will be any ROMs close to vanilla or should I just wait for a better phone to be released?
display is one of THE best IPS displays around, u wont even notice that its 1080p. i know i dont
kirin 950 is on par with sd820 and exynos 8890, so...what about the performance? only area where its slower is graphics, thats it. cpu, ram, especially UI is on par if not better. lots of reports from users stating that mate 8 provides the smoothest day to day experience
also, what exactly do u hope to gain through an aosp rom? visually, u can change the stock roms to look like aosp, no problem. function range is also quite vast already at stock.
in the end, it always depends on whats really important to you:
mate 8 pros: brilliant display, super smooth UI, great sound, huge display size, looooong battery life
mate 8 cons: camera (according to other users, but i havent noticed anything bad), gpu performance (in benchmarks, still plays actual games smoothly)
Sent from my Huawei Mate 8 NXT-AL10 using Tapatalk
jbmc83 said:
display is one of THE best IPS displays around, u wont even notice that its 1080p. i know i dont
kirin 950 is on par with sd820 and exynos 8890, so...what about the performance? only area where its slower is graphics, thats it. cpu, ram, especially UI is on par if not better. lots of reports from users stating that mate 8 provides the smoothest day to day experience
also, what exactly do u hope to gain through an aosp rom? visually, u can change the stock roms to look like aosp, no problem. function range is also quite vast already at stock.
in the end, it always depends on whats really important to you:
mate 8 pros: brilliant display, super smooth UI, great sound, huge display size, looooong battery life
mate 8 cons: camera (according to other users, but i havent noticed anything bad), gpu performance (in benchmarks, still plays actual games smoothly)
Sent from my Huawei Mate 8 NXT-AL10 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are playing around with VR, then 1008p is not the best resolution, rockording in 1080p is not as good as recording in 4k when you play around with motion tracking..
I don't care about the performance, the Kirin don't seems to be as developer friendly as SoCs from Qualcomm.
I like stock sense it's not bloated... and I like to have my devices for as long as possible and I don't think Huawei will keep updating the Mate 8 so long, that's a big reason I wan't AOSP ROMs early so it seems like the device have a bigger chance to be updated to the newest version of Android in a couple of years from now.
Lirkaren said:
If you are playing around with VR, then 1008p is not the best resolution, rockording in 1080p is not as good as recording in 4k when you play around with motion tracking..
I don't care about the performance, the Kirin don't seems to be as developer friendly as SoCs from Qualcomm.
I like stock sense it's not bloated... and I like to have my devices for as long as possible and I don't think Huawei will keep updating the Mate 8 so long, that's a big reason I wan't AOSP ROMs early so it seems like the device have a bigger chance to be updated to the newest version of Android in a couple of years from now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Simple: this device is not for you.
Problem solved :good:
Pfeffernuss said:
Simple: this device is not for you.
Problem solved :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not too be rude or anything but did you give your awnser based on that this device probably won't get an AOSP ROM or did you not read my first post where I said that I can overlook tha 1080p screen and lack of 4k recording?
Lirkaren said:
Not too be rude or anything but did you give your awnser based on that this device probably won't get an AOSP ROM or did you not read my first post where I said that I can overlook tha 1080p screen and lack of 4k recording?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Simply look at the state of AOSP roms in the Mate 7 threads and there's your answer
Hi,
Wich resolution you use ? (1080P/1440P)
And why ?
Please say if you have an S8 or S8+.
It would be Better if you are on Oreo (Samsung have working on it in Oreo for less difference on both resolution )
I use 1080p cant see the difference im on s8
Mads4295 said:
I use 1080p cant see the difference im on s8
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank, you are on Oreo?
1440P oreo. can see the diffirence in resolution, but not in the battery
deraiz12 said:
Thank, you are on Oreo?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes im on Oreo
1440p for sure. If I need to last battery like for a long time (and forget my powerbank) i´ll just probably use battery saver - 720p. Don´t see reason why use 1080p anyway...
Problems with facebook on 720p. Pictures and videos are cropped.
I have seen big difference in smoothness .
For compared in fhd+ my s8 is more fast than mate 9 of my wife and In qhd+ the mate 9 win .
There's minimal battery difference between running it in fullhd+ and qhd+, the only way you would find some battery savings is if you play games a lot. I'm on oreo beta exynos
1440p. I'd rather it look better than get an extra 15 minutes of battery life
Wow...I can't believe people aren't using the full quality of the screen. You do realise the battery difference is negligible right? Whether you use FHD or QHD+, the display is still having to power up all the pixels. You save maybe 15 minutes of battery, nothing more, by using FHD.
Personally I can definitely see the difference in visual quality.
the_scotsman said:
Wow...I can't believe people aren't using the full quality of the screen. You do realise the battery difference is negligible right? Whether you use FHD or QHD+, the display is still having to power up all the pixels. You save maybe 15 minutes of battery, nothing more, by using FHD.
Personally I can definitely see the difference in visual quality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes agree with you but in term of performance the difference are no negligible.
Wtf are you guys talking about? The gpu is always running and rendering for full resolution. From what I understand, this "Screen resolution" setting is nothing like the "Screen resolution that you observe in Windows OS...". The difference is just the percieved resolution (BY APPS!!!) similar to what is done on MacOS..
malimukk said:
Wtf are you guys talking about? The gpu is always running and rendering for full resolution. From what I understand, this "Screen resolution" setting is nothing like the "Screen resolution that you observe in Windows OS...". The difference is just the percieved resolution (BY APPS!!!) similar to what is done on MacOS..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry but I don't agreed with you .
The operation of the gpu is the same as that on video games. If you play in FHD or QHD the request for power is not the same and you need a gpu/cpu more powerful .
A pixel is a pixel is a pixel. The higher the resolution, the "smaller" they seem.... You are still powering on all the pixels regardless ofthe resolution... The resolution, as it was mentioned before, is for the apps to use for scaling (if you ever develop anything for Android, read this article https://developer.android.com/guide/practices/screens_support.html)
Resolution has little to no effect on battery, everyone stop crying about it...
1440p because I wasn't raised in a barn.
Haha! I just had to put that. I do use it but I have no good reason.
I have to agree with an earlier post that the higher resolution would impact performance.
I tried the highest resolution and I agree, everything looks much better and has close to 0 impact on battery life (if that's your thing) but I did notice a significant drop in performance.
That being said on 1080 there 0 lag, while on the higher resolution there's lag even in basic apps like messaging or contacts.
But that's my experience.
I don't really care that much about battery life on the s8 as it always got me through a whole day of usage, regardless of the settings, but I do care about performance.
I am 99% sure changing the resolution has an impact on gpu.
It's correct that I doesn't impact display power consumption but the gpu has to render more, so it will impact gpu performance.
Just my 2cents
Yesterday I received the GPU Turbo Update on my Huawei P20 Pro, and I thought I may share my experience that I had with it so far and also make a list of things that changed with that update.
So far, I gotta say, GPU Turbo is amazing.
I tried it with the following games so far:
PUBG
Shadowgun Legends
Mobile Legends
War Robots
B. O. T.
All games run smoother than before, especially PUBG and Mobile Legends. Also, the device doesn't seem to get as hot as before when having longer gaming sessions, that was especially noticeable in War Robots.
Other things that have changed:
+ when filming in 960 fps: you can now choose between auto (start recording once the camera notices movement) and manual.
+ the font of the AOD (always on display) has been changed
If I notice more changes I'll make sure to post them here.
________
Edits:
the Antutu Score went up from 208.000 to 209.500
Thank you very much for your feedback.
And you feel any difference in ui smoothness?
deraiz12 said:
Thank you very much for your feedback.
And you feel any difference in ui smoothness?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe a slight difference, hard to tell.
i wish you were able to choose when to slow down and sound pitch as iphone has.. that's cool. but 960fps on its own is cool 2
Ikaros Strubbelneko said:
Maybe a slight difference, hard to tell.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK thank you.
ryanrazer said:
i wish you were able to choose when to slow down and sound pitch as iphone has.. that's cool. but 960fps on its own is cool 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't even think these are true 960 fps.
I think the hardware is able to capture 120 fps max.
Almost sure the rest of the images gets computed by the NPU.
I still find it cool that Huawei was able to add such an amazing feature with a simple Software-Update.
Ikaros Strubbelneko said:
I don't even think these are true 960 fps.
I think the hardware is able to capture 120 fps max.
Almost sure the rest of the images gets computed by the NPU.
I still find it cool that Huawei was able to add such an amazing feature with a simple Software-Update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you are right, 480 and 960 is interpolated. Looks bad if you ask me, but most probably you don't
I am on C432 and I still haven't gotten any update. I feel all alone in this right now. Lol
Nah, don't. I haven't got it, my husband hasn't, it always takes a while to reach everybody
all the pugs said:
Nah, don't. I haven't got it, my husband hasn't, it always takes a while to reach everybody
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for this sanity-restoring comment you made. I was almost thinking that I didn't get it because I live in Africa (Nigeria precisely). ☺
god that is horrible, the 960 samples... damn you huawei.
damlancy said:
Thanks for this sanity-restoring comment you made. I was almost thinking that I didn't get it because I live in Africa (Nigeria precisely).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I live in germany.
It didn't show me the update neither, until I reset my device.
be patient, it takes a while till Huawei rolls out the Update for everybody.
all the pugs said:
Nah, don't. I haven't got it, my husband hasn't, it always takes a while to reach everybody
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very similar to the plague.., [emoji38]
Sent from my CLT-L09 using Tapatalk
.128 update perfect for camera shot with 40mp than .131 update. I was updated wrongly 1 month ago and I am not happy with 131 update. Camera oversharpness very bad and not performed new camera functions. How about gpu update? Rear camera fixed? I am not asking front camera because fixed and more beautiful than 131 update.
chronixxx said:
.128 update perfect for camera shot with 40mp than .131 update. I was updated wrongly 1 month ago and I am not happy with 131 update. Camera oversharpness very bad and not performed new camera functions. How about gpu update? Rear camera fixed? I am not asking front camera because fixed and more beautiful than 131 update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have alot of problems with it.
Sometimes the camera tends to oversharp when it is dark, and / or you take pictures with 10 MP, but this has been a rare case for me so far with the latest update.
Ikaros Strubbelneko said:
I don't have alot of problems with it.
Sometimes the camera tends to oversharp when it is dark, and / or you take pictures with 10 MP, but this has been a rare case for me so far with the latest update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you. Is this photo taken with 40mp? Very cool. I think it fixed. Please can you take a wide area photo (include tree and not focus front objects) with 40mp?
chronixxx said:
Thank you. Is this photo taken with 40mp? Very cool. I think it fixed. Please can you take a wide area photo (include tree and not focus front objects) with 40mp?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This photo was taken with 7 MP.
I dont have taken any photos like you described it so far, and it's dark outside right now.
Tho, I will still add a picture that has been shot with 40 MP.
I dont find any of the pictures I took with 40 MP to be over-sharpened btw.
Ikaros Strubbelneko said:
This photo is taken with 7 MP.
I dont have taken any photos like you described it so far, and it's dark outside right now.
Tho, I will still add a picture that has been shot with 40 MP.
I dont find any of the pictures I took with 40 MP to be over-sharpened btw.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OH my God. Really? 7mp?! Verrrry good. I think it is OK with new update :good:
The 960fps auto mode was present in 132 firmware as well.
Not sure if it is just my imagination, but I think that since the update the scrolling speed has been significantly reduced, ie if I check my Instagram feed and try to scroll quickly downwards it goes with less than half the speed with 152 update.. You just can't scroll fast enough anymore, maybe its an Instagram update? Dunno.
Sent from my CLT-L29 using Tapatalk
thanito said:
The 960fps auto mode was present in 132 firmware as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
read again!
Hey guys, welcome to review of samsung m12. I am using this smartphone as my daily drive since 31 October 2021.
.
Let's start :-
Weight and thickness- On paper, it's weight and thickness seens to be a lot but Samsung has somehow managed to a very good weigh destination and it feels normal in hand
Cameras- Primary and ultra wide camera are awesome. One can click really fantastic photos with it. But the rest 2 cameras are kind of trash.
Display- it's display is gorgious but las a bit less brightness
SoC- there is a huge confusion between it's soc but on my testing it's just good
Battery- it has a very large battery. It can easily cover 1.5 days in mixed usage
🄿🅁🄾🅂
Camera
Display
Battery
🄲🄰🄽 🄱🄴 🄱🄴🅃🅃🄴🅁
SoC
🄲🄾🄽🅂
Slow charging
This review was made with Indian retail unit which I purchased from offical samsung's website at a price of 9.5k inr. If u want to know anything else about it just reply
hello, are facing the issue of reduced internet speed on wifi, while using bluetooth earbuds on your samsung M12?? I am facing that issue on my device and it's very irritating, my internet speed is reduced to such extent, i can't even use chrome
sumeetmishra said:
hello, are facing the issue of reduced internet speed on wifi, while using bluetooth earbuds on your samsung M12?? I am facing that issue on my device and it's very irritating, my internet speed is reduced to such extent, i can't even use chrome
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, im not facing that kind of issue.
@Malware said:
Hey guys, welcome to review of samsung m12. I am using this smartphone as my daily drive since 31 October 2021.
.
Let's start :-
Weight and thickness- On paper, it's weight and thickness seens to be a lot but Samsung has somehow managed to a very good weigh destination and it feels normal in hand
Cameras- Primary and ultra wide camera are awesome. One can click really fantastic photos with it. But the rest 2 cameras are kind of trash.
Display- it's display is gorgious but las a bit less brightness
SoC- there is a huge confusion between it's soc but on my testing it's just good
Battery- it has a very large battery. It can easily cover 1.5 days in mixed usage
🄿🅁🄾🅂
Camera
Display
Battery
🄲🄰🄽 🄱🄴 🄱🄴🅃🅃🄴🅁
SoC
🄲🄾🄽🅂
Slow charging
This review was made with Indian retail unit which I purchased from offical samsung's website at a price of 9.5k inr. If u want to know anything else about it just reply
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Kernel gives better performance and battery life since it is both overclocked and underclocked
physwizz said:
My Kernel gives better performance and battery life since it is both overclocked and underclocked
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Share link please
@Malware said:
Share link please
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
M12 u3 kernel