Has anyone installed the P Beta for OP 6 yet? If so what are your thoughts? Hat version of Oxygen OS is it on and how does it perform?
It's not meant for daily driver. It has terrible battery life, weird UI quirks, no OxygenOS features, etc.
Wouldn't recommend it unless you're an app developer and need to test your apps for compatibility.
NateDev said:
It's not meant for daily driver. It has terrible battery life, weird UI quirks, no OxygenOS features, etc.
Wouldn't recommend it unless you're an app developer and need to test your apps for compatibility.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I ran it on my pixel 2 when I had it but I'm guessing it's a lot worse on non Google devices
TechOut said:
I ran it on my pixel 2 when I had it but I'm guessing it's a lot worse on non Google devices
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea it's a lot different. No cool gestures as that's build into the pixel launcher, and it's just way less polished.
Like for example the volume slider uses a brightness asset
NateDev said:
It's not meant for daily driver. It has terrible battery life, weird UI quirks, no OxygenOS features, etc.
Wouldn't recommend it unless you're an app developer and need to test your apps for compatibility.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm getting fairly good battery life. Granted I can't play with my phone at work (always busy and I get no signal anyway) but after 12 hours (granted 11 minutes screen on time) I'm at 63%.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SDM845 for arm64 using Tapatalk
Edit: though I am flashing back since Samsung gear S3 doesn't work with Android P.
Related
I noticed Google Play Services is by far the highest battery user according to my ZenFone 6, e.g. 40% out of 78% was attributed to it:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I know PS provides services for other apps and is not itself the main problem usually but all guides I read told me that it still shouldn't use that much battery. Is this normal or do I have to hunt for a buggy app? And if so, any ideas on how?
TIA
SoWhy
SoWhy said:
I know PS provides services for other apps and is not itself the main problem usually but all guides I read told me that it still shouldn't use that much battery. Is this normal or do I have to hunt for a buggy app?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not normal, but I don't have installed your apps.
Google Play Services isn't present in my battery statistics at all, because it is probably lower than 1%.
It's a glitch. Mine does it too but I can still pull down a good day of battery sometimes more.
Also phone idle sits near the same as well which is also another glitch that needs to be fixed
Sent from my Asus Zenfone 6 using Tapatalk
Don't get me wrong, I usually still can go two days without problems but it still seems weird for PS to appear to drain so much
For what it's worth and for those who are interested, the latest beta update for PS seems to have fixed it
SoWhy said:
For what it's worth and for those who are interested, the latest beta update for PS seems to have fixed it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I face the same problem. How did you fix that.?
I am on Android 9 only without root.
Thanks!
Hello everyone,
Figured I'd throw this out there. Ive been experiencing very poor battery performance with latest OTA_Beta_4.
Before I revert back to something else I wanted to see if anyone else has had the same results?
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
I am experiencing the same issue, thinking about reverting too.
That's normal when it comes to beta releases. They usually have more logging going on in the background causing more drain.
Skickat från min GM1913 via Tapatalk
Fine for me on OB4 see SS below All cancerous social apps, Full Res 1440p + Force 90hz via ADB.
Stock kernel no root.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
liam_davenport said:
Fine for me on OB4 see SS below All cancerous social apps, Full Res 1440p + Force 90hz via ADB.
Stock kernel no root.
View attachment 4863975View attachment 4863977
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did you get that good standby? Mine is horrible...
Ezito said:
How did you get that good standby? Mine is horrible...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Likewise, haven't had this bad of standby in the past 6 months I've owned the phone. Ever since Beta 4, everything else is the same as before but my SOT has dropped by almost 50%. Also did a cache wipe a few days ago, so far no changes
Ezito said:
How did you get that good standby? Mine is horrible...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing at all my guess your apps are draining your battery use a battery monitor like Gsam or something to monitor the drain.
[r26] arter97 kernel for OnePlus 9 series
arter97 kernel for OnePlus 9 series running OxygenOS /* Features */ Supports OnePlus 9 series Fully rebased kernel without unnecessary OnePlus code Latest CAF msm-5.4 kernel fully merged Latest Linux v5.4 subversion merged Latest Google’s...
forum.xda-developers.com
So far so good on 11.2.9.9BA, no issues.
Shoot not gonna lie, think it's running better for "me" than Omega
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
avid_droid said:
Experiencing some weird issues today and my battery drain seems a bit worse than stock. I'll wait for the final release
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. I went back to Omega
Battery life hasnt been great, but it does work with ACC while other stock kernels are not. Im sure it will continue to imprprove.
_MartyMan_ said:
So far so good on 11.2.9.9BA, no issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay now i'm running a7, there are some issues.
- Battery life seems to be worse than before (I was using crDroid before switching back to OOS tho, maxbe it's the same)
- Typce-C to Jack converter does not work (It doesn't even recognize it)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
how does having a few hundred megabytes equal 8gb? I have debloated this watch and removed a bunch of crap. Wth
This is apparently typical.
The OS/native apps isn't small, some blame Gookill for this
The sad part is I've already removed everything I can from this watch without breaking functionality
spart0n said:
The sad part is I've already removed everything I can from this watch without breaking functionality
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look at the heavy hitters and see if you can find a way to replace them or live without them.
I run very few Google apps, most are enabled on an as needed basis on my N10+'s. Saves 1-2%@hr SOT, and more at night.
spart0n said:
The sad part is I've already removed everything I can from this watch without breaking functionality
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you notice a permonce improvement or a less consuming behaviour after debloating, or just more space available? I was thinking about to do it but if there's not much differece leaving aside the space, I prefer let things be like they are.
xdaforo said:
Do you notice a permonce improvement or a less consuming behaviour after debloating, or just more space available? I was thinking about to do it but if there's not much differece leaving aside the space, I prefer let things be like they are.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My wife and I both have this same watch and I really wanted to compare them as mine being debloated and hers not. But honestly it's not a noticeable difference battery-wise
Hello,
Is my Geekbench score okay or something is wrong?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Quite under the expected range. Did you perform it at ambient temperature, or used a heavy-load app stressing the chip just before running the test?
I remember my first one gave similar results, I then ran an other one and it was more accurate to the chip advertised performances.
Jaxom84 said:
Quite under the expected range. Did you perform it at ambient temperature, or used a heavy-load app stressing the chip just before running the test?
I remember my first one gave similar results, I then ran an other one and it was more accurate to the chip advertised performances.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried to run it after a while and it performs much better now, I don't know what caused it, before first test I was using Chrome nothing much...
hiMLASTAR7 said:
I tried to run it after a while and it performs much better now, I don't know what caused it, before first test I was using Chrome nothing much...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When you look at your screenshot, it seems the CPU is also focusing on how energy is spent (energy_aware), which could also explain the first results. The device can understand how you use it and adapt the power usage depending on what you "teach" it. So nothing to worry about.
Also, the Android 13 Beta is showing some improvements for Exynos versions of the device, so expect it to run even better with time.
Here are my current results with the Android 13 Beta 1 on my Exynos 2200, so you can see the little improvement.
Android 13 one ui 5 beta exynos 2200