I wounder if someone could help me, I wounder if any if you could upload a few DNG raw files?
A few photos in daylight and indoors.
Have search the whole web after raw files from Mate 9, only find a few from DPreview.
So if anyone could upload a some raw files I will be really glad!
Thanks!
@Peterrrrr said:
I wounder if someone could help me, I wounder if any if you could upload a few DNG raw files?
A few photos in daylight and indoors.
Have search the whole web after raw files from Mate 9, only find a few from DPreview.
So if anyone could upload a some raw files I will be really glad!
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here are some sample images for you. On my OneDrive, since the forum doesn't support .dng uploads directly. Feel free to browse through them. Both day and night, they look much worse, and don't have the optic correction, that the JPEGs have. Haven't found any lens correction profiles for the Mate 9 either sadly. Perhaps someone cares to make some? I may get a printer and make some of my own and share with everybody, but that's going to be a while. https://1drv.ms/f/s!AhHXH2_hyYaJhJtI_r3zpkJ7lqzpow Here they are!
Swan Princess said:
Here are some sample images for you. On my OneDrive, since the forum doesn't support .dng uploads directly. Feel free to browse through them. Both day and night, they look much worse, and don't have the optic correction, that the JPEGs have. Haven't found any lens correction profiles for the Mate 9 either sadly. Perhaps someone cares to make some? I may get a printer and make some of my own and share with everybody, but that's going to be a while. https://1drv.ms/f/s!AhHXH2_hyYaJhJtI_r3zpkJ7lqzpow Here they are!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks alot, if you got more I would be even more happier If you have some pictures on faces it would also be great, how the camera works on skintones.
As a photographer after trying a few dng files(from you and DPreivew) in Photoshop I can say that the the camera software processing is a bit off, to much noise reduction and wrong color. Even if the niose is higher on the DNG files it is more correct and sharper. More details.
@Peterrrrr said:
Thanks alot, if you got more I would be even more happier If you have some pictures on faces it would also be great, how the camera works on skintones.
As a photographer after trying a few dng files(from you and DPreivew) in Photoshop I can say that the the camera software processing is a bit off, to much noise reduction and wrong color. Even if the niose is higher on the DNG files it is more correct and sharper. More details.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm glad you like them. Sadly I don't have any face photos, as I'm a landscape and astronomy photographer. I shoot in raw+jpeg and I'm happy with both formats. At least when walking around and not wanting to lug a heavy camera around. It's no Pentax K-1 though regarding image quality, but it's better then my old note 4 that's for sure! Plus, the .dng format allows me to mount the Mate 9 on a tripod and do some stacking and removal of dark frames for ubernice, mostly noise-free results!
Swan Princess said:
I'm glad you like them. Sadly I don't have any face photos, as I'm a landscape and astronomy photographer. I shoot in raw+jpeg and I'm happy with both formats. At least when walking around and not wanting to lug a heavy camera around. It's no Pentax K-1 though regarding image quality, but it's better then my old note 4 that's for sure! Plus, the .dng format allows me to mount the Mate 9 on a tripod and do some stacking and removal of dark frames for ubernice, mostly noise-free results!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you have more nature pics in DNG I would like to see them Daylight, rainy, foggy...
Nice to see that you like Astronomy, I take night sky picutres myself, haven an Nikon D800
@Peterrrrr said:
If you have more nature pics in DNG I would like to see them Daylight, rainy, foggy...
Nice to see that you like Astronomy, I take night sky picutres myself, haven an Nikon D800
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mate 9 is all I currently have (well a replacement rear camera is on its way), I'm drooling over that Pentax though. Same sensor as in the D810 with a few Astronomical benefits. I will keep on uploading to that folder then, so check back frequently!
Swan Princess said:
Mate 9 is all I currently have (well a replacement rear camera is on its way), I'm drooling over that Pentax though. Same sensor as in the D810 with a few Astronomical benefits. I will keep on uploading to that folder then, so check back frequently!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks alot! Really kind of you.
Swan Princess said:
Mate 9 is all I currently have (well a replacement rear camera is on its way), I'm drooling over that Pentax though. Same sensor as in the D810 with a few Astronomical benefits. I will keep on uploading to that folder then, so check back frequently!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@Swan Princess
Do you(or anyone else on this forum ) have any 4K loseless video file to upload? Would like to see from daylight and indoors.
The ones on youtube ara a bit bad.
[/COLOR]
@Peterrrrr said:
@Swan Princess
Do you(or anyone else on this forum ) have any 4K loseless video file to upload? Would like to see from daylight and indoors.
The ones on youtube ara a bit bad.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have any videos for now, but I'll let you know when I get some. Please keep in mind that they are encoded in HEVC / h.265, you'll need hardware that is able to decode it. So what will you use it all for again?
Swan Princess said:
[/COLOR]
I don't have any videos for now, but I'll let you know when I get some. Please keep in mind that they are encoded in HEVC / h.265, you'll need hardware that is able to decode it. So what will you use it all for again?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am extremly on details , Im in thought in buying an Mate 9 but I really need to see DNG and 4K in detail before buying it
I am a photographer and have high demands.
I am going to try an Mate 9 Pro tomorrow and wounder where the DNG RAW files is located in the storage on the phone?
Anyone here have any DNG photo from indoors with persons in the room?
Related
I am looking for a smartphone which can take good photos indoor/outdoor at night. Can someone put a 23mp original photo (original photo - maybe it can be uploaded to somewhere like prnt.sc). Other daytime photos will also be useful for me. Thanks for your efforts.
kursatgoker said:
I am looking for a smartphone which can take good photos indoor/outdoor at night. Can someone put a 23mp original photo (original photo - maybe it can be uploaded to somewhere like prnt.sc). Other daytime photos will also be useful for me. Thanks for your efforts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can find a number of low light/night shots in the "Disappointed by the Z5 camera pictures quality: a critical comparison!" thread in the Z5 General subforum. Turns out that in order to get the best quality images from the Z5, users need to select the supersampled 8mp option (which turn out to be pretty great).
Here is a post containing recent low light/night photos with the Z5:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=64002554&postcount=630
ye... I'm waiting on sony to unleash the z5 camera true potential, I rarely use the 23mp option
kursatgoker said:
I am looking for a smartphone which can take good photos indoor/outdoor at night. Can someone put a 23mp original photo (original photo - maybe it can be uploaded to somewhere like prnt.sc). Other daytime photos will also be useful for me. Thanks for your efforts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Low light
Adrift98 said:
You can find a number of low light/night shots in the "Disappointed by the Z5 camera pictures quality: a critical comparison!" thread in the Z5 General subforum. Turns out that in order to get the best quality images from the Z5, users need to select the supersampled 8mp option (which turn out to be pretty great).
Here is a post containing recent low light/night photos with the Z5:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=64002554&postcount=630
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's an ISO 64 and 50 photo got to do with low light? trust me you will not get those ISO's in low light.
In my opinion, this is one of the worst camera's from the Z series to date, especially in low light, noise reduction algorithm is ridiculously high in all shots. My frustration was also with the Manual mode where you are extremely limited by the settings you are able to select, ISO only available in 8MP mode from my first quick play last night...
I have posted photos from various other Z series cameras on flickr @ https://www.flickr.com/photos/dan-wilson/albums/72157635854728695
IMO the Z1 car picture on flickr @ISO800 is better than Z5 @iso200 that I took last night. I am sure a big part of this bad performance is also due to the amount of heat generated by the phone (hotter the sensor the more noise)
danw_oz said:
What's an ISO 64 and 50 photo got to do with low light? trust me you will not get those ISO's in low light.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you mean to reply to me? I didn't say anything about ISO 64 and 50.
danw_oz said:
I am sure a big part of this bad performance is also due to the amount of heat generated by the phone (hotter the sensor the more noise)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, I never thought about that, looked it up just now, and yes, hotter CCDs produce noisier images!
Maybe you should place your Z5 in iced water before shooting?
Adrift98 said:
Did you mean to reply to me? I didn't say anything about ISO 64 and 50.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry no the link you provided was not low light as suggested
---------- Post added at 09:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:16 PM ----------
ricodredd said:
Wow, I never thought about that, looked it up just now, and yes, hotter CCDs produce noisier images!
Maybe you should place your Z5 in iced water before shooting?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It also part of the reason bigger sensor cameras take better shots noise wise, bigger surface area so able to stay cooler, especially during long exposures
danw_oz said:
Sorry no the link you provided was not low light as suggested
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess I'm still confused. The link I provided certainly does have links to low-light pictures.
Here's Timaustin2000's low light pictures from that post in case you missed them the first time.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/23131636795/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/22707632337/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/23191896562/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/22919075159/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/23286947165/
Adrift98 said:
I guess I'm still confused. The link I provided certainly does have links to low-light pictures.
Here's Timaustin2000's low light pictures from that post in case you missed them the first time.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/23131636795/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/22707632337/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/23191896562/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/22919075159/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/23286947165/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I gave up looking after clicking on the first link and seeing it wasn't low light at all
Considering the resolution being used im suprised how poor the sensor is? It handles low light shockingly bad.
Noise is insane and its a shame.
Also theres no ability to edit the 360 image that i have found thus far, it needs to be flattened into a jpeg and that obviously defeats the purpose,
So anyone with any advice please can you discuss your experience?
jamiee6610 said:
Considering the resolution being used im suprised how poor the sensor is? It handles low light shockingly bad.
Noise is insane and its a shame.
Also theres no ability to edit the 360 image that i have found thus far, it needs to be flattened into a jpeg and that obviously defeats the purpose,
So anyone with any advice please can you discuss your experience?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, automode is terrible with dark photos, even with the night setting. I've had better luck in manual mode and keeping the shutter open longer, but it can be overexposed if the light on both sides of the camera is not equal - a constant challenge with 360 cameras.
But you can edit them in Photoshop - you just have to save them as 360 photos and with proper EXIF data so the viewer knows they're 360 photos.
Here's a good manual on how to do it:
https://facebook360.fb.com/editing-360-photos-injecting-metadata/
jamiee6610 said:
Considering the resolution being used im suprised how poor the sensor is? It handles low light shockingly bad.
Noise is insane and its a shame.
Also theres no ability to edit the 360 image that i have found thus far, it needs to be flattened into a jpeg and that obviously defeats the purpose,
So anyone with any advice please can you discuss your experience?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was able to edit the photos and videos from the 360 cam I have made a video about it here
https://youtu.be/wszkGqhooxE
Also Fyi there is a new firmware and app update which seems to have improved the quality of the images a bit as well as introducing an interval meter (timelapse) which is cool in 360 for that I used adobe premiere but the results where great
johnfred1987 said:
Also Fyi there is a new firmware and app update which seems to have improved the quality of the images a bit as well as introducing an interval meter (timelapse) which is cool in 360 for that I used adobe premiere but the results where great
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am super stoked about this. Looking forward to trying it this weekend.
Good evening folks.
My Note 4 perished by cat and I've settled on a Mate 9 as my replacement phone. I have a couple of questions to those who own it before purchase though.
1.) How easy does the camera glass scratch? That was quite the issue for my Note 4. Will I require a full case to avoid image quality degradation by scratches?
2.) Are the new phone cases (not refurbished) sealed in any fashion from the factory. There are no official outlets here and I'm worried about buying a refurbished dud.
3.) Does the white version really feel like it's made out of Ceramic?
4.) I'd love to see some .dng low light / night and landscape sample images I could do some Photoshop magic on. I'm a photographer at heart and can't quite find anything but .jpegs out there.
Your help would be much appreciated! ^v^
Swan
Swan Princess said:
1.) How easy does the camera glass scratch? That was quite the issue for my Note 4. Will I require a full case to avoid image quality degradation by scratches?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google JerryRigEverything on youtube for his mate 9 video he does a durability video on this.
Here a low light raw pic https://www.mediafire.com/download/soa45631qw42i13
gm007 said:
Here a low light raw pic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much for your reply! It seems that the raw files can't be opened in my favorite DXO Optics Played around with some Photosop. It seems quite formidable to preserve details, but I see some noise in the recovered shadows / flat dark areas. The white balance errs a bit on the cool side of things. And you have a very comfy looking sofa, that made me feel sleepy :>I guess I'll just have to get used to it. My main interests are weather photography, as well as landscapes. I am sure I can make it work for my purposes.
Does a lens correction profile exist for this camera at all?
Swan Princess said:
Thank you very much for your reply! It seems that the raw files can't be opened in my favorite DXO Optics Played around with some Photosop. It seems quite formidable to preserve details, but I see some noise in the recovered shadows / flat dark areas. The white balance errs a bit on the cool side of things. And you have a very comfy looking sofa, that made me feel sleepy :>I guess I'll just have to get used to it. My main interests are weather photography, as well as landscapes. I am sure I can make it work for my purposes.
Does a lens correction profile exist for this camera at all?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean by lens correction profile?
Do you need a preset correcting vignette and distortion?or you mean raw editor in Photoshop is limited?
gm007 said:
What do you mean by lens correction profile?
Do you need a preset correcting vignette and distortion?or you mean raw editor in Photoshop is limited?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do mean correction of lens geometry and I guess vignetting as well yes. Does such a thing even exist for this model? In all other aspects it seems to be mostly like a professional camera. I also mean that Photoshop does not have the correction information for the shot, like say Nexus 6P has (at least judging by the list of supported cameras in PS).
Swan Princess said:
I do mean correction of lens geometry and I guess vignetting as well yes. Does such a thing even exist for this model? In all other aspects it seems to be mostly like a professional camera. I also mean that Photoshop does not have the correction information for the shot, like say Nexus 6P has (at least judging by the list of supported cameras in PS).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In Photoshop there is lens correction in filters menu.
Yes exif data is not available,maybe need an updated camera raw software.
In my opinion the camera is very good and using the manual mode you can easily take great photos.
gm007 said:
In Photoshop there is lens correction in filters menu.
Yes exif data is not available,maybe need an updated camera raw software.
In my opinion the camera is very good and using the manual mode you can easily take great photos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also noticed that the JPEG processing algorithm does wonders to reduce the noise! Alas I'm very obsessed over shooting everything in .dng / RAW!
There is lens correction, but I can't find support for this phone / lens combination. Without such a profile the correction is useless. EXIF data is all there, as far as I can see with IrfanView and it all looks legit. Phone model, exposure time, F-Stop, etc. Why would you say EXIF isn't available? Can't you see it?
I couldn't see it in Photoshop but with acdsee pro it's there.
I was comparing the raw files from my p9 and it seems they are better than mate 9.
Not sure why but i will do more test tomorrow.
gm007 said:
I couldn't see it in Photoshop but with acdsee pro it's there.
I was comparing the raw files from my p9 and it seems they are better than mate 9.
Not sure why but i will do more test tomorrow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you set up a tripod then inside and take two same low light images on Mate 9 and P9 with the same settings and share with us please? Would be really nice!
Swan Princess said:
Could you set up a tripod then inside and take two same low light images on Mate 9 and P9 with the same settings and share with us please? Would be really nice!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure tomorrow, it's around 1 am here
gm007 said:
Sure tomorrow, it's around 1 am here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, soon 0200 in the night and I'ms till awake. All those thoughts swarming in my head. Another thing I'd love to see is dark noise comparison. So ISO 100, 30-second exposures with the lenses closed with both P9 and Mate 9. That's quite an important figure in photography. What do the sensors show, when there's nothing to show.
Swan Princess said:
Yeah, soon 0200 in the night and I'ms till awake. All those thoughts swarming in my head. Another thing I'd love to see is dark noise comparison. So ISO 100, 30-second exposures with the lenses closed with both P9 and Mate 9. That's quite an important figure in photography. What do the sensors show, when there's nothing to show.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i see more blue noise in mate 9 than p9 in dark or closed lens.
gm007 said:
Yes i see more blue noise in mate 9 than p9 in dark or closed lens.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, that is interesting. I thought that the camera sensors should be identical in them both? Could anyone else confirm that the image quality is worse on the Mate, then it is on the P9?
Swan Princess said:
Well, that is interesting. I thought that the camera sensors should be identical in them both? Could anyone else confirm that the image quality is worse on the Mate, then it is on the P9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
P9 has 2 12MP sensors,mate 9 has 1 12MP and 1 20MP,there is no info which sensors they use.
I will do the test when i get home.
gm007 said:
P9 has 2 12MP sensors,mate 9 has 1 12MP and 1 20MP,there is no info which sensors they use.
I will do the test when i get home.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try doing the test with 1.1x zoom as well. I heard the image quality improves quite a bit. Seems that the JPEG is made from both sensors and the .dng from only one?
Swan Princess said:
Try doing the test with 1.1x zoom as well. I heard the image quality improves quite a bit. Seems that the JPEG is made from both sensors and the .dng from only one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Didn't have time last night Champions League
But i did quick test at 100 iso 30sec for both mate9 and p9,here the dng files https://www.mediafire.com/download/1w8rosw8jxcnw2r
gm007 said:
Didn't have time last night Champions League
But i did quick test at 100 iso 30sec for both mate9 and p9,here the dng files https://www.mediafire.com/download/1w8rosw8jxcnw2r
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did a quick enhance on those dark images in Photoshop and it seems indeed that the two phones run completely different imaging hardware. The P9 had a bit of amp glow on the top and bottom of the image, while the Mate 9 had a darker circle in the middle and overall much less noise. Very interesting, also none of those two files had EXIF in them this time. Not sure what to think about it all. Am I just doing silly things?
Another question I have before purchase is would it be possible to tell of a re-branded version, if I aim to get the EU 64GB one? May I get a re-flashed Chinese one instead? Is there a surefire way to tell of a genuine L29 was it?
Swan Princess said:
Another question I have before purchase is would it be possible to tell of a re-branded version, if I aim to get the EU 64GB one? May I get a re-flashed Chinese one instead? Is there a surefire way to tell of a genuine L29 was it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only the imei on box should match imei inside the phone.
I own a P9 Lite and managed to enable RAW capture in PRO Photo mode, however there is this issue that is totally killing my joy.
Shooting RAW, the camera takes one compressed .jpeg and one RAW .dng. However, no matter the shooting conditions, the RAW .dng always comes out blurry and very soft.
I used a tripod, very, very fast shutter speeds, in broad daylight and the .dngs ALWAYS come out unfocused. They're just a very blurry mess.
Anyone able to chime in an maybe offer some insight?
zgomot said:
I own a P9 Lite and managed to enable RAW capture in PRO Photo mode, however there is this issue that is totally killing my joy.
Shooting RAW, the camera takes one compressed .jpeg and one RAW .dng. However, no matter the shooting conditions, the RAW .dng always comes out blurry and very soft.
I used a tripod, very, very fast shutter speeds, in broad daylight and the .dngs ALWAYS come out unfocused. They're just a very blurry mess.
Anyone able to chime in an maybe offer some insight?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you explain how did you enable this feature ? Thank you
Marsou77 said:
Could you explain how did you enable this feature ? Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://www.xda-developers.com/guide-enables-raw-capture-in-the-stock-huawei-p9-lite-camera/
zgomot said:
https://www.xda-developers.com/guide-enables-raw-capture-in-the-stock-huawei-p9-lite-camera/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just tried and it works nicely for me on my P9.
Take a picture and be stable 5s after the shot. Processing is longer that normal.
Sent from my Huawei P9 powered by LineageOS ?
zgomot said:
https://www.xda-developers.com/guide-enables-raw-capture-in-the-stock-huawei-p9-lite-camera/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No Pro-Mode on P9 lite?
dkionline said:
No Pro-Mode on P9 lite?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is but by default, it only takes .jpeg images.
About the blurriness, the culprit is the stock gallery app, which doesn't render RAW files correctly. Imported into Lightroom, the .dng is actually quite a bit sharper than the .jpeg.
Hi,
I received my Mi Note 10 and I've been testing the camera. Am I the only one that thinks that while taking normal outside pictures (27mp mode) the image taken has lots of blurriness and distortion? As of now I'm not really enjoying the phone.
Came from a Mi Note 3 which took amazing pictures.
RikoF1 said:
Hi,
I received my Mi Note 10 and I've been testing the camera. Am I the only one that thinks that while taking normal outside pictures (27mp mode) the image taken has lots of blurriness and distortion? As of now I'm not really enjoying the phone.
Came from a Mi Note 3 which took amazing pictures.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I'm going through the same thing ... I can't get clear answers on this subject. Only thing I know the camera aperture is too big so taking close-up shots of the blur is terribly bad, I don't know if future updates will fix it. I came from a Mi 9 and his pictures were better than the Mi Note 10
You need to understand the implication applied when camera using a larger sensor. This is not only about apperture and lenses. I explain it in other thread.
But there is nothing we can do, even in Pro mode? We cannot setup the aperture, so the depth of field is quite ridiculous. Can have a clear picture of a bottle label if the camera is not exactly parallel lol
Is there something we can do to mitigate?
Airwave said:
......
Is there something we can do to mitigate?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. You can edit the photos with photoshop.
rasik80 said:
Yes. You can edit the photos with photoshop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no you can't if they're blurry. i would also like to be able to take photos, where everything is in focus.
Kasallamacher said:
no you can't if they're blurry. i would also like to be able to take photos, where everything is in focus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then put all your objects at least 2++ metres from camera
Kasallamacher said:
no you can't if they're blurry. i would also like to be able to take photos, where everything is in focus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then buy another phone.
rasik80 said:
Then buy another phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're very funny
Kasallamacher said:
You're very funny
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he is being fair enough though. Because what you expect is like using a fix apperture lens on a full frame DSLR, and still expecting a result with wide depth of field unconditionally.
It's simply against the principal and law of the photography physics itself.
If you really need that, then you gonna need phone with either : smaller sensor, or less bright lens, or both.
I don't think it is, it's a question of software. I was sitting at a table wanting to take a photo of our cocktails. Mine was in focus, the one right behind already blurred. I understand that physically this is normal, but software should be able to take a photo with everything in focus.
Kasallamacher said:
I don't think it is, it's a question of software. I was sitting at a table wanting to take a photo of our cocktails. Mine was in focus, the one right behind already blurred. I understand that physically this is normal, but software should be able to take a photo with everything in focus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah. You can think what you like then. The physics wont change. And every people who understand the theory behind depth of field, will agree.
I know what you expect the software to do though. Sharpen the object in background or do focus stacking. As for sharpening, it' just a pseudo focus, and i rather not having it at all. Focus stacking, though, is considerable,
If thats what you like, then just get yourself a photoshop and do some layer masking job, because no stock smartphone camera app implement focus stacking AFAIK. The closer you can get is by using "Open Camera" app and use the focus bracketing software.
You can 'kind of' fix the effect in software by using focus bracketing. Open Camera supports this and you specify how many photos to take and it will take that number at different focal lengths. Then you process the images with some stacking software like Helicon Focus which produces an image with a huge depth of field.
Of course, this is all more complicated than just pointing and pressing. A nice feature would be if the camera software takes all the photos and stacks them for you, but I doubt any camera software will do all this for you..
Cheers
Steve
Mine had a focusing problem and what I did? I’ve changed to full mode instead of 3:4. Regarding the focusing around the center, I don’t think there is a solution than using more the portrait mode.
I’m not a camera guy so these setting were enough for me.
RikoF1 said:
Hi,
I received my Mi Note 10 and I've been testing the camera. Am I the only one that thinks that while taking normal outside pictures (27mp mode) the image taken has lots of blurriness and distortion? As of now I'm not really enjoying the phone.
Came from a Mi Note 3 which took amazing pictures.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you talking about
Here are one picture taken from me i dont think is blurry
Everything looks in focus