Lg l fino is similar to core - Samsung Galaxy Core

everyone check the lg l fino. Isn't it similar to core. Can you please port it's rom to core. They even got cm 14

Plawan21nov said:
everyone check the lg l fino. Isn't it similar to core. Can you please port it's rom to core. They even got cm 14
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to understand that you need the EXACT SAME CHIPSET in order to port ROMs.

Letzen said:
You have to understand that you need the EXACT SAME CHIPSET in order to port ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what about gti8552, it got sd200 where core is s4 play?

Plawan21nov said:
what about gti8552, it got sd200 where core is s4 play?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As you can see, they work like s*** while CM 10.2 built exactly for GT-I8260 works like a charm.
Samsung never gave us the source codes to build ROMs. But Quattro/Win is available. People ported this, but it isn't working that well.

Related

Auxus Core X4

Hi Guys,
if you want to root Auxus Core X4 Just install the apk for the link below and that will even take care of the Security Vurnebility on Exynos processors!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2050297
Enjoy
Press Thanks if this helped !
NEW ROM?
Good stuff, I found it out too before seeing this. If I had seen this post before, I didn't have to be as worried as I was when i was trying to root it.
I was wondering, since this is a Galaxy S3 clone, is it possible to use a SGS3 JB ROM in this box with minor tweaks? I have no hope that the company would release a JB ROM anytime soon, because not even the Chinese guys who made the tab provide a JB ROM. If I have other AUXUS X4 users to collaborate I will be happy to help out.
I don't think it will be too difficult to do a port of Cyanogen or something to this platform since the core part of the code is already there.
Cheers!
arifanwar said:
Hi Guys,
if you want to root Auxus Core X4 Just install the apk for the link below and that will even take care of the Security Vurnebility on Exynos processors!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2050297
Enjoy
Press Thanks if this helped !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is my version of it, Galaxy S3 has a small display compared to a Tablet and the ROM would be more customized for potrait view so resolution, camera, display type could be some of the issues.
The first step would be to get a working CWM, I have been trying for two days to get a CWM to work on this but all methods have failed so far as it seems the bootloader is locked and the commads don't work much.
The closest match from samsung family to our device would be Galaxy Note 10.1 and it already has officical JB for UK so that can be used but again resolution and Camera won't match and that might need a little effort as the display and camrea hardware is different.
we might get lucky if some dev already has this tablet and can help us
arifanwar said:
Hi Guys,
if you want to root Auxus Core X4 Just install the apk for the link below and that will even take care of the Security Vurnebility on Exynos processors!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2050297
Enjoy [/I][/B][/COLOR]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did u root ur corex4 3g with this apk file? if so any cons after rooting with this...
Yes I did no issues at all
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda app-developers app
hthsing magestic
arifanwar said:
Yes I did no issues at all
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any mods for core x4.can we use galaxy tab 10.1 Tom on it

iphone 4 mt6575 need help porting cyanogen mod

hello guys, I got this iphone 4s clone mt6575. since then, ive always wanted to get a new rom for this phone. i've worked on porting some CyanogenMod 7 on this device but it doesnt boot. please help me im just a newbie and im sorry for my bad english:crying:
this is the backup of my stock rom
www dropbox com/s/mma4wgc1n6uw1jr/NastyJeax_build.V1.0.0.rar
dont be bothered with the build coz i made some modifications of this. lol
hope you guys help me with this. PLEASE.
you cannot get cyanogenmod running on your particular device at this time. a cyanogenmod based on this chipset is in work, but is barely working yet. (just SystemUI starts, everything will FC).
ouch.. . that doesn't sound good.. anyway, can u give me links to the cyanogenmod development of this chipset? please
joevenrey said:
ouch.. . that doesn't sound good.. anyway, can u give me links to the cyanogenmod development of this chipset? please
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are gonna need it as without the full and proper kernel source code for each and every device that runs that chip it will never work completely. This is the reason CM doesnt support cheap knock offs.
zelendel said:
They are gonna need it as without the full and proper kernel source code for each and every device that runs that chip it will never work completely. This is the reason CM doesnt support cheap knock offs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had CM10 on my Jiayu G3 with the 6577. I'm sure it could be done someday. It actually ran quite smoothly. It just had a few bugs with some apps and had a battery drain but was otherwise rock solid.
think its possible for this chipset (MT6575) coz i found some posts proving that they have sucesfully ported CM7 and i actually tried to port using thier ROM with no luck at all. why my system apps starting with "BR" like BRMms.apk?

[DEV][PORTING][I9300] Linux 3.4.x/3.1x.x Kernel for i9300/ feature requests welcome

Hey Guys and Girls!
I own this device since quite a short time and i wanted to ask if any developer is willing to port the 3.4.x kernel to our S3 i9300, since it would bring us some big performance, stability and security enhancements since we are stuck at 3.0.101. We would really profit of this as its much more actual and better for coming upgrades. Please correct me if there are already some devs trying to port this or if anything else is wrong.
My previous device was/is the Samsung Galaxy S Plus and we got a 3.4.x kernel that runs very well and gave us some big improvements. We officially only got Android 2.3.6 with a 2.6.x kernel and our great devs managed to found a dev team and to bring us a fully working 3.0.x and 3.4.x kernel and Android 4.0 to latest 4.4.
I could provide some github repositories and some more additional info if needed, just PM me if you want to start on this. I can't code or compile that much but i could provide nearly everything you need in my opinion.
Greets,
markey97
Edit: I can try to port this on my own but i think that i most likely need YOUR help. Just to have that said
Edit2: I mean the international S3 i9300
Edit3: Changed title
Edit4: Base for the kernel is there! Developement will start slowly in the following days/weeks and source will be pushed to github in some time.
Edit5: I will port this on my own, if anyone wants/ is willing to help me, PM me. I will show you my detailed progress here and will maybe give an ETA, but if i don't, don't ask for it since i also have private live, and i will code and provide you with info when I'm free and when i want to.
Feel free to post feature requests/suggestions over here in the thread!!
markey97 said:
Hey Guys and Girls!
I own this device since quite a short time and i wanted to ask if any developer is willing to port the 3.4.x kernel to our S3 since it would bring us some big performance, stability and security enhancements since we are stuck at 3.0.101. We would really profit of this as its much more actual and better for coming upgrades. Please correct me if there are already some devs trying to port this or if anything else is wrong.
My previous device was/is the Samsung Galaxy S Plus and we got a 3.4.x kernel that runs very well and gave us some big improvements. We officially only got Android 2.3.6 with a 2.6.x kernel and our great devs managed to found a dev team and to bring us a fully working 3.0.x and 3.4.x kernel and Android 4.0 to latest 4.4.
I could provide some github repositories and some more additional info if needed, just PM me if you want to start on this. I can't code or compile that much but i could provide nearly everything you need in my opinion.
Greets,
markey97
Edit: I can try to port this on my own but i think that i most likely need YOUR help. Just to have that said
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you talking about the S3 LTE phone? the one that has an exynos4 cpu? I'm definitely interested in this! I've been looking and trying to port over a 3.4.x+ kernel since the 3.0.101 is at EOL.
ztotherad said:
are you talking about the S3 LTE phone? the one that has an exynos4 cpu? I'm definitely interested in this! I've been looking and trying to port over a 3.4.x+ kernel since the 3.0.101 is at EOL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats exactly the way i think about it, we need a more actual kernel on our devices, not just a newer Android version to stay on the safe side, but i a also have to disappoint you, because i meant the i9300. But we could definitely together try to port it also to the i9305 which you meant, right?
Greets,
markey97
markey97 said:
Thats exactly the way i think about it, we need a more actual kernel on our devices, not just a newer Android version to stay on the safe side, but i a also have to disappoint you, because i meant the i9300. But we could definitely together try to port it also to the i9305 which you meant, right?
Greets,
markey97
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, sorry, in actually running the t0ltevzw (Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note 2). same processor, just clocked a tad higher. i looked at the sgs+ and saw it's running a Qualcomm cpu, so it may be harder to implement what the devs of the sgs+ put into affect, but I'm ready to learn and hack my way around.
Could anyone be so kind to enlighten me why this thread about "i9300" appeares in every note 2 forum on xda? each time i want to jump straight to i9300 it gets me first through all the note 2 forums. this is kind of silly.
am i the only one getting to see this thread in the note 2 forums?
nonyhaha said:
Could anyone be so kind to enlighten me why this thread about "i9300" appeares in every note 2 forum on xda? each time i want to jump straight to i9300 it gets me first through all the note 2 forums. this is kind of silly.
am i the only one getting to see this thread in the note 2 forums?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because this is the s3/note developer only forums.
edit: this get left in the dark?
ztotherad said:
because this is the s3/note developer only forums.
edit: this get left in the dark?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean if this thread is dead or the project abandoned?
No its not, i just don't have enough time to work on this till Christmas (school..arggh) but then i will try to port it in a time span of 2 weeks or so. Lol.
I'm searching for the source base and what I need to port it and then I will start when my holidays start. Yeeeah!:victory:
Greets:highfive:,
markey97
markey97 said:
You mean if this thread is dead or the project abandoned?
No its not, i just don't have enough time to work on this till Christmas (school..arggh) but then i will try to port it in a time span of 2 weeks or so. Lol.
I'm searching for the source base and what I need to port it and then I will start when my holidays start. Yeeeah!:victory:
Greets:highfive:,
markey97
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
deleted.
How are going to run propietary libs designed for 3.0 on 3.4?
GR0S said:
How are going to run propietary libs designed for 3.0 on 3.4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There aren't any
Gesendet von meinem GT-N7105 mit Tapatalk 2
How is this coming along, I could be interested at looking into this maybe
arj03 said:
How is this coming along, I could be interested at looking into this maybe
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i definitely second this!
galaxy s3 neo i9300i use 3.4x kernel and cpu exynos 4412
http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=sub&sub=F&searchValue=i9300i
The S Plus has the 3.4 Kernel for a long time now:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2165341
Sent from my GT-I9305 using xda app-developers app
blackcat67 said:
galaxy s3 neo i9300i use 3.4x kernel and cpu exynos 4412
http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=sub&sub=F&searchValue=i9300i
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That looks promising, big thanks for that info :highfive:
If that's real that it is a 3.4 kernel, our work could get a lot more easier. Downloading the code atm and will check it and report it. And if its 3.4, I will directly start to (try to) "port" it over so that we can have 3.4 kernel by the end of the next week! :thumbsup:
markey97 said:
That looks promising, big thanks for that info :highfive:
If that's real that it is a 3.4 kernel, our work could get a lot more easier. Downloading the code atm and will check it and report it. And if its 3.4, I will directly start to (try to) "port" it over so that we can have 3.4 kernel by the end of the next week! :thumbsup:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The devil kernel for the Note 2 variants has more of a "pseudo-" 3.4.x kernel. DerTeufel has implemented it, but not fully nor do I know if he's going to try to implement it fully.
The only thing that kills the Note 2 variants is that the s3 is OC'd at 1.2GHz while the Note 2 is OC'd at 1.6. but I'll have to check out the above file and see what I can do and possibly change to match the Note 2s.
Or if anyone knows of a device that has the exact same specs as the N710x and has a 3.4 kernel, PM me and I'll respond accordingly!
thanks!
ztotherad said:
The devil kernel for the Note 2 variants has more of a "pseudo-" 3.4.x kernel. DerTeufel has implemented it, but not fully nor do I know if he's going to try to implement it fully.
The only thing that kills the Note 2 variants is that the s3 is OC'd at 1.2GHz while the Note 2 is OC'd at 1.6. but I'll have to check out the above file and see what I can do and possibly change to match the Note 2s.
Or if anyone knows of a device that has the exact same specs as the N710x and has a 3.4 kernel, PM me and I'll respond accordingly!
thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha I know that, I'm working together with him
He ported over a whole bunch of "features/updates" from the original 3.4 Kernel and he/we mostlikely want(s) to fully implement everything.
That's no problem at all 'cause DerTeufel will/can easily adapt it to the corresponding device. And the S3's (i9300) standard clock speed is 1.4 GHz
Elsewhere I think all other components are (nearly) the same.
markey97 said:
Haha I know that, I'm working together with him
He ported over a whole bunch of "features/updates" from the original 3.4 Kernel and he/we mostlikely want(s) to fully implement everything.
That's no problem at all 'cause DerTeufel will/can easily adapt it to the corresponding device. And the S3's (i9300) standard clock speed is 1.4 GHz
Elsewhere I think all other components are (nearly) the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, with the i9300 international version of the S3, I believe we've got the same CPU, maybe same RAM [but I'm thinking the ram on the i9300 is 1.5GB while on the Note 2 it's 2GB]. idk, I'm going to download the neo source code and check it out later since i'm about to leave to go to work.
ztotherad said:
yeah, with the i9300 international version of the S3, I believe we've got the same CPU, maybe same RAM [but I'm thinking the ram on the i9300 is 1.5GB while on the Note 2 it's 2GB]. idk, I'm going to download the neo source code and check it out later since i'm about to leave to go to work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
s3 has 1 gb ram with exynos 4 soc
s3 neo has 1.5 gb ram with qualcomm soc
Sent from F2FS FORMATED I9300XXUGNB6 NeatROM v7.2 + AGNi pureSTOCK v3.6 kernel
psndna88 said:
s3 has 1 gb ram with exynos 4 soc
s3 neo has 1.5 gb ram with qualcomm soc
Sent from F2FS FORMATED I9300XXUGNB6 NeatROM v7.2 + AGNi pureSTOCK v3.6 kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
which all together = no 3.4 love for the Note 2 damn you samsung! why can't you give us some love! lol.
needless to say though, I'm glad to see that DerTeufel has been able to pseudo-implement the 3.4 kernel into his source. I'm also grateful for our kernel love that awesome devs give us.

[Q] Will tab 2's hardware be capable of running Android Lollipop?

A curios question i thought, Is there is a chance that the hardware be capable of running the long-awaited Lollipop?
Thanks in advance.
Hassan 4 said:
A curios question i thought, Is there is a chance that the hardware be capable of running the long-awaited Lollipop?
Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If even Motorola Moto E will be able to run Android 5.0, why Tab 2 won't?
We just need to wait for CM12, and a maintainer to give the word to start the builds for our device. Then, we shall enjoy sweetness :3
fr4n said:
If even Motorola Moto E will be able to run Android 5.0, why Tab 2 won't?
We just need to wait for CM12, and a maintainer to give the word to start the builds for our device. Then, we shall enjoy sweetness :3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope as you say so, Getting bored from KitKat
Hassan 4 said:
I hope as you say so, Getting bored from KitKat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My only worry is about Tab 2's CPU. It's kind of outdated... but I hope we still get Android 5.0
Didn't think KitKat would be smooth, but I was surprised at how smmoth it runs, lollipop should be just as good or better.
Pp.
Android is not like windows,
It gets better and faster

E3 2212 Install aosp binaries

Hello guys would like to know how to install using windows binaries in the kitkat AOSP d2212 appreciate the help of all.
i9assistencia said:
Hello guys would like to know how to install using windows binaries in the kitkat AOSP d2212 appreciate the help of all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's no 4.4 AOSP for our device, we can expect a alpha/beta release of 5.0 AOSP for the next weeks/months but therefore it's not working on dual SIM E3 variants like 2212 for now.
adrianocolvero said:
There's no 4.4 AOSP for our device, we can expect a alpha/beta release of 5.0 AOSP for the next weeks/months but therefore it's not working on dual SIM E3 variants like 2212 for now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, really it comes to custom roms for sony we always have to be patient because everything always takes a little longer if not for the work of the external dev we would not ever leave the 4.4.2
i9assistencia said:
Ok, really it comes to custom roms for sony we always have to be patient because everything always takes a little longer if not for the work of the external dev we would not ever leave the 4.4.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
8---> yeah

Categories

Resources