Hey Guys and Girls!
I own this device since quite a short time and i wanted to ask if any developer is willing to port the 3.4.x kernel to our S3 i9300, since it would bring us some big performance, stability and security enhancements since we are stuck at 3.0.101. We would really profit of this as its much more actual and better for coming upgrades. Please correct me if there are already some devs trying to port this or if anything else is wrong.
My previous device was/is the Samsung Galaxy S Plus and we got a 3.4.x kernel that runs very well and gave us some big improvements. We officially only got Android 2.3.6 with a 2.6.x kernel and our great devs managed to found a dev team and to bring us a fully working 3.0.x and 3.4.x kernel and Android 4.0 to latest 4.4.
I could provide some github repositories and some more additional info if needed, just PM me if you want to start on this. I can't code or compile that much but i could provide nearly everything you need in my opinion.
Greets,
markey97
Edit: I can try to port this on my own but i think that i most likely need YOUR help. Just to have that said
Edit2: I mean the international S3 i9300
Edit3: Changed title
Edit4: Base for the kernel is there! Developement will start slowly in the following days/weeks and source will be pushed to github in some time.
Edit5: I will port this on my own, if anyone wants/ is willing to help me, PM me. I will show you my detailed progress here and will maybe give an ETA, but if i don't, don't ask for it since i also have private live, and i will code and provide you with info when I'm free and when i want to.
Feel free to post feature requests/suggestions over here in the thread!!
markey97 said:
Hey Guys and Girls!
I own this device since quite a short time and i wanted to ask if any developer is willing to port the 3.4.x kernel to our S3 since it would bring us some big performance, stability and security enhancements since we are stuck at 3.0.101. We would really profit of this as its much more actual and better for coming upgrades. Please correct me if there are already some devs trying to port this or if anything else is wrong.
My previous device was/is the Samsung Galaxy S Plus and we got a 3.4.x kernel that runs very well and gave us some big improvements. We officially only got Android 2.3.6 with a 2.6.x kernel and our great devs managed to found a dev team and to bring us a fully working 3.0.x and 3.4.x kernel and Android 4.0 to latest 4.4.
I could provide some github repositories and some more additional info if needed, just PM me if you want to start on this. I can't code or compile that much but i could provide nearly everything you need in my opinion.
Greets,
markey97
Edit: I can try to port this on my own but i think that i most likely need YOUR help. Just to have that said
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you talking about the S3 LTE phone? the one that has an exynos4 cpu? I'm definitely interested in this! I've been looking and trying to port over a 3.4.x+ kernel since the 3.0.101 is at EOL.
ztotherad said:
are you talking about the S3 LTE phone? the one that has an exynos4 cpu? I'm definitely interested in this! I've been looking and trying to port over a 3.4.x+ kernel since the 3.0.101 is at EOL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats exactly the way i think about it, we need a more actual kernel on our devices, not just a newer Android version to stay on the safe side, but i a also have to disappoint you, because i meant the i9300. But we could definitely together try to port it also to the i9305 which you meant, right?
Greets,
markey97
markey97 said:
Thats exactly the way i think about it, we need a more actual kernel on our devices, not just a newer Android version to stay on the safe side, but i a also have to disappoint you, because i meant the i9300. But we could definitely together try to port it also to the i9305 which you meant, right?
Greets,
markey97
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, sorry, in actually running the t0ltevzw (Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note 2). same processor, just clocked a tad higher. i looked at the sgs+ and saw it's running a Qualcomm cpu, so it may be harder to implement what the devs of the sgs+ put into affect, but I'm ready to learn and hack my way around.
Could anyone be so kind to enlighten me why this thread about "i9300" appeares in every note 2 forum on xda? each time i want to jump straight to i9300 it gets me first through all the note 2 forums. this is kind of silly.
am i the only one getting to see this thread in the note 2 forums?
nonyhaha said:
Could anyone be so kind to enlighten me why this thread about "i9300" appeares in every note 2 forum on xda? each time i want to jump straight to i9300 it gets me first through all the note 2 forums. this is kind of silly.
am i the only one getting to see this thread in the note 2 forums?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because this is the s3/note developer only forums.
edit: this get left in the dark?
ztotherad said:
because this is the s3/note developer only forums.
edit: this get left in the dark?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean if this thread is dead or the project abandoned?
No its not, i just don't have enough time to work on this till Christmas (school..arggh) but then i will try to port it in a time span of 2 weeks or so. Lol.
I'm searching for the source base and what I need to port it and then I will start when my holidays start. Yeeeah!:victory:
Greets:highfive:,
markey97
markey97 said:
You mean if this thread is dead or the project abandoned?
No its not, i just don't have enough time to work on this till Christmas (school..arggh) but then i will try to port it in a time span of 2 weeks or so. Lol.
I'm searching for the source base and what I need to port it and then I will start when my holidays start. Yeeeah!:victory:
Greets:highfive:,
markey97
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
deleted.
How are going to run propietary libs designed for 3.0 on 3.4?
GR0S said:
How are going to run propietary libs designed for 3.0 on 3.4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There aren't any
Gesendet von meinem GT-N7105 mit Tapatalk 2
How is this coming along, I could be interested at looking into this maybe
arj03 said:
How is this coming along, I could be interested at looking into this maybe
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i definitely second this!
galaxy s3 neo i9300i use 3.4x kernel and cpu exynos 4412
http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=sub&sub=F&searchValue=i9300i
The S Plus has the 3.4 Kernel for a long time now:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2165341
Sent from my GT-I9305 using xda app-developers app
blackcat67 said:
galaxy s3 neo i9300i use 3.4x kernel and cpu exynos 4412
http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=sub&sub=F&searchValue=i9300i
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That looks promising, big thanks for that info :highfive:
If that's real that it is a 3.4 kernel, our work could get a lot more easier. Downloading the code atm and will check it and report it. And if its 3.4, I will directly start to (try to) "port" it over so that we can have 3.4 kernel by the end of the next week! :thumbsup:
markey97 said:
That looks promising, big thanks for that info :highfive:
If that's real that it is a 3.4 kernel, our work could get a lot more easier. Downloading the code atm and will check it and report it. And if its 3.4, I will directly start to (try to) "port" it over so that we can have 3.4 kernel by the end of the next week! :thumbsup:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The devil kernel for the Note 2 variants has more of a "pseudo-" 3.4.x kernel. DerTeufel has implemented it, but not fully nor do I know if he's going to try to implement it fully.
The only thing that kills the Note 2 variants is that the s3 is OC'd at 1.2GHz while the Note 2 is OC'd at 1.6. but I'll have to check out the above file and see what I can do and possibly change to match the Note 2s.
Or if anyone knows of a device that has the exact same specs as the N710x and has a 3.4 kernel, PM me and I'll respond accordingly!
thanks!
ztotherad said:
The devil kernel for the Note 2 variants has more of a "pseudo-" 3.4.x kernel. DerTeufel has implemented it, but not fully nor do I know if he's going to try to implement it fully.
The only thing that kills the Note 2 variants is that the s3 is OC'd at 1.2GHz while the Note 2 is OC'd at 1.6. but I'll have to check out the above file and see what I can do and possibly change to match the Note 2s.
Or if anyone knows of a device that has the exact same specs as the N710x and has a 3.4 kernel, PM me and I'll respond accordingly!
thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha I know that, I'm working together with him
He ported over a whole bunch of "features/updates" from the original 3.4 Kernel and he/we mostlikely want(s) to fully implement everything.
That's no problem at all 'cause DerTeufel will/can easily adapt it to the corresponding device. And the S3's (i9300) standard clock speed is 1.4 GHz
Elsewhere I think all other components are (nearly) the same.
markey97 said:
Haha I know that, I'm working together with him
He ported over a whole bunch of "features/updates" from the original 3.4 Kernel and he/we mostlikely want(s) to fully implement everything.
That's no problem at all 'cause DerTeufel will/can easily adapt it to the corresponding device. And the S3's (i9300) standard clock speed is 1.4 GHz
Elsewhere I think all other components are (nearly) the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, with the i9300 international version of the S3, I believe we've got the same CPU, maybe same RAM [but I'm thinking the ram on the i9300 is 1.5GB while on the Note 2 it's 2GB]. idk, I'm going to download the neo source code and check it out later since i'm about to leave to go to work.
ztotherad said:
yeah, with the i9300 international version of the S3, I believe we've got the same CPU, maybe same RAM [but I'm thinking the ram on the i9300 is 1.5GB while on the Note 2 it's 2GB]. idk, I'm going to download the neo source code and check it out later since i'm about to leave to go to work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
s3 has 1 gb ram with exynos 4 soc
s3 neo has 1.5 gb ram with qualcomm soc
Sent from F2FS FORMATED I9300XXUGNB6 NeatROM v7.2 + AGNi pureSTOCK v3.6 kernel
psndna88 said:
s3 has 1 gb ram with exynos 4 soc
s3 neo has 1.5 gb ram with qualcomm soc
Sent from F2FS FORMATED I9300XXUGNB6 NeatROM v7.2 + AGNi pureSTOCK v3.6 kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
which all together = no 3.4 love for the Note 2 damn you samsung! why can't you give us some love! lol.
needless to say though, I'm glad to see that DerTeufel has been able to pseudo-implement the 3.4 kernel into his source. I'm also grateful for our kernel love that awesome devs give us.
Related
hello guys, I got this iphone 4s clone mt6575. since then, ive always wanted to get a new rom for this phone. i've worked on porting some CyanogenMod 7 on this device but it doesnt boot. please help me im just a newbie and im sorry for my bad english:crying:
this is the backup of my stock rom
www dropbox com/s/mma4wgc1n6uw1jr/NastyJeax_build.V1.0.0.rar
dont be bothered with the build coz i made some modifications of this. lol
hope you guys help me with this. PLEASE.
you cannot get cyanogenmod running on your particular device at this time. a cyanogenmod based on this chipset is in work, but is barely working yet. (just SystemUI starts, everything will FC).
ouch.. . that doesn't sound good.. anyway, can u give me links to the cyanogenmod development of this chipset? please
joevenrey said:
ouch.. . that doesn't sound good.. anyway, can u give me links to the cyanogenmod development of this chipset? please
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are gonna need it as without the full and proper kernel source code for each and every device that runs that chip it will never work completely. This is the reason CM doesnt support cheap knock offs.
zelendel said:
They are gonna need it as without the full and proper kernel source code for each and every device that runs that chip it will never work completely. This is the reason CM doesnt support cheap knock offs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had CM10 on my Jiayu G3 with the 6577. I'm sure it could be done someday. It actually ran quite smoothly. It just had a few bugs with some apps and had a battery drain but was otherwise rock solid.
think its possible for this chipset (MT6575) coz i found some posts proving that they have sucesfully ported CM7 and i actually tried to port using thier ROM with no luck at all. why my system apps starting with "BR" like BRMms.apk?
Hey guys, I have been looking for a jb miui ROM for this device and i cant find one, i know there are some ics miui ROMs, but i would really like a jb miui ROM.
There is one for the vibrant, can I use it for my Galaxy s 4G or can anyone port it to our device?
Vibrant MIUI JB ROM:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2289234
Thanks
i'll build it when miui comes out with miui 4.2
airfluip1 said:
i'll build it when miui comes out with miui 4.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you i will be looking forward to it.
Beast said he would do it.
sent from me
that's been in my queue for a while along with aokp aries and paranoid android.
airfluip1 said:
i'll build it when miui comes out with miui 4.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2313073
Just because there are some homebrew ports doesn't mean that MIUI is 4.2 yet.
http://en.miui.com/download.html
Official Downloads
Author : MIUI Developer Team
Kernel : Android 4.1
Latest update : 3.6.21
Download : http://www.miui.com/download.html
Language : Chinese and English
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why does it matter ? We use unofficial ROMs anyway...
sent from me
That's like saying that since a car, airplane, and weed-whacker all run on gas, you should just put the same stuff in each. Actually, the unofficial ROMS is a more tenuous connection than my gas connection. It's more like saying that since a bullet train, horse, and diesel bus all run on fuel, the fuel which goes into each shouldn't matter. It's all fuel.
Hey, you could (please don't) use an unofficial Vibrant ROM too. That's unofficial. What's the difference? The difference is that it won't work. And might brick your phone. That's bad.
Our only current Aries kernel is 4.2.2 and still has issues. MIUI is still 4.1.2 and would introduce an entirely new set of issues tied into GPS, Bluetooth, and so forth if/when a 4.1.2 Aries kernel was compiled. Does that make it impossible? No. But it means that as the build impetus - when MIUI is 4.2 - has not happened yet... it's not a great use of time yet. Unless one of the devs wants it. In which case, MIUI being not-updated is something they don't need to be hammered over the head with.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2313073
4.2.2?
Port. If YOU see source linked from that page so our devs could actually do something useful to build that...
Hi Theraze
I have to disagree with you.
Port is not a dirty word and most of our ROMs are actually ports and not built from source. Furthermore, MIUI ROM is usually ported and not built from source and only recently did Xiaomi open their sources for the public. Even more than that, both MIUI versions brought to us by Beast were ports from Nexus and not built from source.
Now, regarding the incompatibility between kernel & OS - if it works on Nexus, I assume the adjustments were made, so one can enjoy both 4.2.2 & MIUI benefits. There is no logical reason why it couldn't be ported to our beloved device.
sent from me
I'm not saying it can't be done. I'm saying that our build-from-source dev who asked you to let him know when it hit 4.2 hasn't had his request met.
Does that mean that someone (him or another dev) CAN'T port it? Nope. But it makes it a lot less likely that air can just pull the source in and compile it using the Aries bits if the buildable MIUI is still only 4.1.2 and our Aries is 4.2.2 instead.
Again, I think we're agreeing on the general bits... yes, this is possible. But airfluip1 asked to be notified when buildable MIUI was 4.2.2 and that's when he said he'd build it. Not port it.
I don't care if a ROM is ported or built from source.
I will try to play with porting it myself.
Android 4.4 Kitkat has support & compitable to tegra 2 so i just want to know that,
when Samsung is going to give update to galaxy R..
Dont expect. Samsung has stopped feeding his unwanted kid after ICS.
Although We might get Official Omni. Devs are working hard.
Nikhil said:
Dont expect. Samsung has stopped feeding his unwanted kid after ICS.
Although We might get Official Omni. Devs are working hard.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
check this site>>>
http://crocksz.com/index.php/nominated-galaxy-devices-android-4-4-kitkat/
&
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2521042
According to this Website our galaxy R is nominated for Kitkat Upgrade :laugh:
so this time Samsung may give kk upgrade...
Devesh25 said:
check this site>>>
http://crocksz.com/index.php/nominated-galaxy-devices-android-4-4-kitkat/
&
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2521042
According to this Website our galaxy R is nominated for Kitkat Upgrade :laugh:
so this time Samsung may give kk upgrade...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hardly believe. Samsung hasnt officially released list of devices supported for kitkat. it is currently rolling out 4.3 for several devices.
use OmniRom until this news gets confirmed.
We shall discuss over this one. better to move this thread to General discussion thread and Rename the thread once more time.
As per Google, Any mobile company must upgrade their device at-least 1 time in its life time.
also, There is 2nd opinion where, Google said, if any device is having 512 MB Ram and 4GB internal memory - Can avail the KK if their company wants.
So, In future, If Samsung wants, then can upgrade it. But as per Link - they have nominate it. It will get KK if only God or Samsung Officials want.
D™ said:
We shall discuss over this one. better to move this thread to General discussion thread and Rename the thread once more time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good: ok fine but how to move this thread to General discussion
Devesh25 said:
:good: ok fine but how to move this thread to General discussion
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ask MOD to do it on your behalf.
This is like some joke. Theres no way Samsung is bringing kitkat to galaxy R. One may think that we may get official 4.4, because it runs on even 512 mb ram. But if u know your device properly, it was never incapable of running any jelly bean version IF Samsung wanted. And if u know Samsung properly, they won't bother bringing kitkat to long lost device which no one's heard of except their owners.
Also, that cited website is not a popular one. If this was true, the news would have been all over the web. The list has S2 on it, which is big deal.
I think when they nominated devices, they meant the devices capable and not the ones Samsung chose for upgrade. That's all i wanted to say.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda app-developers app
gitanshu said:
This is like some joke. Theres no way Samsung is bringing kitkat to galaxy R. One may think that we may get official 4.4, because it runs on even 512 mb ram. But if u know your device properly, it was never incapable of running any jelly bean version IF Samsung wanted. And if u know Samsung properly, they won't bother bringing kitkat to long lost device which no one's heard of except their owners.
Also, that cited website is not a popular one. If this was true, the news would have been all over the web. The list has S2 on it, which is big deal.
I think when they nominated devices, they meant the devices capable and not the ones Samsung chose for upgrade. That's all i wanted to say.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol... micromax A110 is getting KK.
It is much capable to handle every ROM but again, Samsung. So, we can say OMNI or other one can b ported to oir device.
भेजा है मेरे डिस्टर्ब™ मोबाइल से तापाटाक के द्वारा
Galaxy R already has 4.3 update !!!!???
According to the following site, Galaxy R already has 4.3 update!!!
http://www.mobicpc.com/how-to-update-samsung-galaxy-r-to-android-4-3.html
rbanavara said:
According to the following site, Galaxy R already has 4.3 update!!!
http://www.mobicpc.com/how-to-update-samsung-galaxy-r-to-android-4-3.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its Fake. They must be drunk while writing. There is no official update from samsung after Ics for Galaxy R.
How does kitkat has tegra2 support!
Just out of curiosity, how does kitkat has support for tegra2. If my understanding is correct, google has stopped supporting tegra2 4.2 onwards (or is it only CM). If kitkat indeed has support for tegra2, then oneday omnirom can see a stable release version right (we only have nightlies now)?
Also the support matters only for core apps that directly run os kernel. The ones that run on dalvic vm doesn't have have to worry about this right?
rbanavara said:
Just out of curiosity, how does kitkat has support for tegra2. If my understanding is correct, google has stopped supporting tegra2 4.2 onwards (or is it only CM). If kitkat indeed has support for tegra2, then oneday omnirom can see a stable release version right (we only have nightlies now)?
Also the support matters only for core apps that directly run os kernel. The ones that run on dalvic vm doesn't have have to worry about this right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. It is only CM that doesn't support tegra2.
Google uses neon instructions and since tegra2 lacks neon we don't and will never have support for features depending on neon. However, there is always a workaround so we just have to adjust with the workaround provided to us. Albeit nightly, Omni is stable enough to be used as daily driver. There are few bugs but those will be fixed over time. Omni will eventually get stable someday.
We want cm ROM for SM-N900. get support please quote
I am sorry Dr. Ketan - VN team - murat25750 - Alba1986 - lidroid-criskelo. We love you but we want cm rom
Thank you
Tapatalk **NOTE 3 Dr.ketan K5 Rom S5 TEMA*** OS 4.4.2 KitKat**
Android rom yükleme, root etme, recovery flaşlama, bootloader işlemleri
Samsung, HTC, LG, Sony ve MTK Replika cihazlar
+1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
I really got hope after getting CM on LTE models but now really sad for our N900. Why? Why?
+1 to get CM on our phone
phyowaiummg said:
I really got hope after getting CM on LTE models but now really sad for our N900. Why? Why?
+1 to get CM on our phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+11111
I asked this question before but I am not sure which sources are not available for Note3 to make CM rom and why samsung is not releasing those sources ?
alien0101 said:
+11111
I asked this question before but I am not sure which sources are not available for Note3 to make CM rom and why samsung is not releasing those sources ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We have best rom and kernel developers for stock base rom although they are cooking without the team. On my previous phone,S advance(I9070) they start CM from the scratch and now BOOM! Please someone expert kindly explains why we can't get CM. No sources?
Its been months now of waiting for a vanilla android to come out on n900...I hope there is a dev that can assist us with some AOSP
Sent from my SM-N900 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
yeah and i have made up my mind not to buy international version of galaxy note series next time because of lack of CM Rom support or i'll shift to sony
used note 1 and note 2 neither of them had this problem
but this time samsung screwed us
+1
N900 only has 4-5 developers and this is disapointing
+111111111111111111111111111
CM is available here and they also have an excellent wiki that explains how to build. I highly suggest giving it a try if you wish to have it.
However, posting requests and/or demands for a ROM in the development sections is inappropriate. This section is only for sharing something you've developed or are currently working on.
Thread Closed.
I'm trying, I have to be sure that it works 100%, for now it's all good.
https://ibb.co/ZHVxDB6
https://ibb.co/fXyD82z
https://ibb.co/syFGGTG
https://ibb.co/7K1GxXy
https://ibb.co/0y655WJ
https://ibb.co/8sxQd6M
XDA:DevDB Information
How to Root Galaxy S9+ on Android 9.0 Pie (SM.G9650), ROM for the Samsung Galaxy S9+
Contributors
Pochito2119
ROM OS Version: 2.3.x Gingerbread
Version Information
Status: Testing
Created 2019-03-10
Last Updated 2019-03-10
Wow, u mean to say that youve (potentially)achieved root for the Snapdragon galaxy s9+, running One UI? If this pans out I can honestly say you've made my week, possibly month! Lmk via PM/EMAIL If u need any experienced 'Rooters' to test this method out.... :good:
Edited to add: why does it say ROM OS 2.3 Gingerbread???
This would be the BEST THING EVER !!!!
Ppl are dumb? This as already ben posted on s9 forum, root can be made only flashing klabit kernel until now magisk cant root alone
So... how exactly did you do this? This is for the Snapdragon 845 version of the S9+, right?
BigBrad75 said:
Wow, u mean to say that youve (potentially)achieved root for the Snapdragon galaxy s9+, running One UI? If this pans out I can honestly say you've made my week, possibly month! Lmk via PM/EMAIL If u need any experienced 'Rooters' to test this method out.... :good:
Edited to add: why does it say ROM OS 2.3 Gingerbread???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
philiptibbs said:
This would be the BEST THING EVER !!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
krion64 said:
So... how exactly did you do this? This is for the Snapdragon 845 version of the S9+, right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you all realizing that's only for the SM-G9650, which indeed have a Snapdragon but it's unlockable?
explain
you made a thread that how to root smg9650 that's s9 plus snapdragon variant.....but theres no explanation and files that u used to root....plz tell step by step (try to make a YouTube video or post screenshots ) that how to root...coz many like me are very new to root also theres so much confusion because of so many model numbers....i wish if there was a pre-rooted rom that i could flash with Odin simply....i only can dream lol ....noone is explaining here ?
Pochito2119 said:
I'm trying, I have to be sure that it works 100%, for now it's all good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you compiled a kernel and installed it? Thats all you need to do. There is code in the 9650 pie kernel that will panic the kernel if you try to run a binary under a uid <1000 that is on a filesystem that isnt system, odm, vendor, or root. Recompile a 100% stock kernel with CONFIG_RKP_NS_PROT off and it will work fine
What's the status on this?? It just kinda went silent. Is this an actual working way of rooting?