Database Info

Jelly Bean released !!! Possible to port Nexus ROM ?

Hello respected Developers ,
Jelly Bean is released today with some new and important features. Nexus ROM is already available for download. Since Jelly Bean brings updated UI and few new features only it may be possible to port Nexus ROM.
Kindly consider its possibility and reply
Thank you all !
Here is direct download link
http://goo.im/roms/fabolous/maguro/bigxie_JRN84D_rooted_busybox_deodexed.zip
Hmm...so I was right. It can be ported.
Jelly Bean ported to HTC One X http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1737736

I hope so.
I'm not a Developer, but I hope so :good:

nothing will be done until the source code is released (google said mid july)

Guys, chill. It is best we wait until ics is fully developed with the kernel 3.x before we talk about this. I am sure that this needs ICS as base. I have been researching about this jellybean update the whole day. it is somewhat a small update to the ICS with automatic widget resizing, GoogleVoice (commandable just like siri) and also less lag... this is just like a froyo to gingerbread update as they said in vid reviews.

now our future is on the 3.X kernel:good:

Hi
Did anyone noticed that kernel for jelly bean port on HTC one x.
It is 2.6.xxx
Sent from my GT-I9003 using Tapatalk

neil05 said:
@vishal
You are not the moderator in this forum. So don't act like a mod
Cheers:beer:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, but I am
Thread moved and cleaned. Development section is only for roms/kernels, etc. being worked on with some kind of bootable image. This is not. (First hint was the title ends in a question mark)
Keep it polite guys.
---Jay--- From the Nexus

The porting Guide can be found here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1739561

Thanks Jay
And apologies for posting in wrong section. Everyday we learn something new
Thanks !

Maybe...
I'm not a developer and i don't know how to port a ROM. However, I think porting an I9000 Jellybean Rom will be easier since I9000 and I9003 has similar specs.:laugh:

chung1213 said:
I'm not a developer and i don't know how to port a ROM. However, I think porting an I9000 Jellybean Rom will be easier since I9000 and I9003 has similar specs.:laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
an i9000 stock rom is impossible because samsung wont release one. and jb code is not out until mid-july. let's wait for cm10 to start
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using xda app-developers app

NEXUS S got the jelleybean working
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1738756
Galaxy s are on there way to port jellybean.

Vasishta Reddy said:
NEXUS S got the jelleybean working
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1738756
Galaxy s are on there way to port jellybean.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i9003 will follow, once kernel 3.0 + ics is completely ported and good for day-to-day basis ^^

Everytime it happens that when we work on perticular version of cynogenmod then suddenly new version of galaxy device releases or new version of android releases then current development looks old to us. So we leave it in incomplete stage & we move forward to achieve new things of new cynogenmod but again everytime same story repeats & thats why we have so many incomplete cyanogenmod roms.
I want to suggest that if the developers are working on ICS cm9 then they must work on first to achieve kernel 3.0 & get stable cm9. People now should not rush to achieve JB leaving behing cm9 work incomplete. "One time one task"

vishal24387 said:
Everytime it happens that when we work on perticular version of cynogenmod then suddenly new version of galaxy device releases or new version of android releases then current development looks old to us. So we leave it in incomplete stage & we move forward to achieve new things of new cynogenmod but again everytime same story repeats & thats why we have so many incomplete cyanogenmod roms.
I want to suggest that if the developers are working on ICS cm9 then they must work on first to achieve kernel 3.0 & get stable cm9. People now should not rush to achieve JB leaving behing cm9 work incomplete. "One time one task"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
K bro,why to waste time in partially working ports lets wait for source code's release .

Vasishta Reddy said:
K bro,why to waste time in partially working ports lets wait for source code's release .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source code of jelly bean is of no use for us until we get kernel 3.0. Because building jelly bean rom or cm10 based on 2.x kernel is again a waste of time & again one more incomplete rom

vishal24387 said:
Source code of jelly bean is of no use for us until we get kernel 3.0. Because building jelly bean rom or cm10 based on 2.x kernel is again a waste of time & again one more incomplete rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right on that one bro.

Regarding porting Jelly Bean, it's another challenge for our great developers. And it is possible since it has already started coming on many devices. Another point is that JB does not introduce System level changes like ICS but a major update over it. So JB should easier than ICS.
Regarding Incomplete ROMs, each and every developer has his own set of skills and can't do what other can do and we must respect this. What dhiru can do is not necessarily doable by others too. But this should not come as deterrent for some quality work like MIUI and AOKP. If we would have kept waiting for 'Perfect and Complete' ICS then we would never have these great ROMs. These guys are working within known limitations and doing a great job. So i would always encourage new challenges, innovations, ideas, development and ROMs. We again might have many things not working on JB Ports but that's what fuel the developers to take up challenge and win it. Remember the first ICS and MIUI Ports ? And look today Thankfully Lolation, Frank, UT36104, Vurrut did not get discouraged by current limitations and went on to port these great ROMs and fix bugs. Thank You guys
Take every new thing as a challenge and give your best with whatever you have in hand instead of crying of what's not there or what will come someday
Good Day guys

silentvisitor said:
Regarding porting Jelly Bean, it's another challenge for our great developers. And it is possible since it has already started coming on many devices. Another point is that JB does not introduce System level changes like ICS but a major update over it. So JB should easier than ICS.
Regarding Incomplete ROMs, each and every developer has his own set of skills and can't do what other can do and we must respect this. What dhiru can do is not necessarily doable by others too. But this should not come as deterrent for some quality work like MIUI and AOKP. If we would have kept waiting for 'Perfect and Complete' ICS then we would never have these great ROMs. These guys are working within known limitations and doing a great job. So i would always encourage new challenges, innovations, ideas, development and ROMs. We again might have many things not working on JB Ports but that's what fuel the developers to take up challenge and win it. Remember the first ICS and MIUI Ports ? And look today Thankfully Lolation, Frank, UT36104, Vurrut did not get discouraged by current limitations and went on to port these great ROMs and fix bugs. Thank You guys
Take every new thing as a challenge and give your best with whatever you have in hand instead of crying of what's not there or what will come someday
Good Day guys
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I completely agree. People learn by doing hands on, and what I mean is building roms. Discouraging them just because you want them to complete a rom is very selfish, everybody has to start somewhere. Not everybody has sufficient knowledge in android programming to help with completing roms, i believe people feel a sense of accomplishment after building their first rom, only to be struck down by others that want a complete rom. I just want to say guys, don't discourage new roms please, think about other people's feelings. Thanks.
Cheers
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda app-developers app

bscraze said:
I completely agree. People learn by doing hands on, and what I mean is building roms. Discouraging them just because you want them to complete a rom is very selfish, everybody has to start somewhere. Not everybody has sufficient knowledge in android programming to help with completing roms, i believe people feel a sense of accomplishment after building their first rom, only to be struck down by others that want a complete rom. I just want to say guys, don't discourage new roms please, think about other people's feelings. Thanks.
Cheers
Sent from my GT-I9003 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not about discouraging new rom development. Its about how well we concentrate on each thing to complete it. I am not saying that we should stuck to only one perticular rom development. But remember guys that google will not take a pause for us so that we can complete current cynogenmod rom. New versions of android will contineously come out by google but we must have to think whether we should run behind new roms or should we first build a base kernel 3.x without which every future development will remain incomplete...???

android 4.4

android 4.4 (kitkat) said to have support to older phones... will htc pico able to get it??? (don't say "it's not released yet" just asking...) :silly::silly::silly::silly:

born noob developing pro said:
android 4.4 (kitkat) said to have support to older phones... will htc pico able to get it??? (don't say "it's not released yet" just asking...) :silly::silly::silly::silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Official, no. HTC by putting low memory and no updates is trying to force us to buy new phone (preferably thiers).
Unofficial on XDA, probably yes.

galaxyfreak said:
Official, no. HTC by putting low memory and no updates is trying to force us to buy new phone (preferably thiers).
Unofficial on XDA, probably yes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good::good::good: kk bro... expecting... (kitkat weekly 1: xx-xx-xxx from you bro :fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed: )

[DEV][PORTING][I9300] Linux 3.4.x/3.1x.x Kernel for i9300/ feature requests welcome

Hey Guys and Girls!
I own this device since quite a short time and i wanted to ask if any developer is willing to port the 3.4.x kernel to our S3 i9300, since it would bring us some big performance, stability and security enhancements since we are stuck at 3.0.101. We would really profit of this as its much more actual and better for coming upgrades. Please correct me if there are already some devs trying to port this or if anything else is wrong.
My previous device was/is the Samsung Galaxy S Plus and we got a 3.4.x kernel that runs very well and gave us some big improvements. We officially only got Android 2.3.6 with a 2.6.x kernel and our great devs managed to found a dev team and to bring us a fully working 3.0.x and 3.4.x kernel and Android 4.0 to latest 4.4.
I could provide some github repositories and some more additional info if needed, just PM me if you want to start on this. I can't code or compile that much but i could provide nearly everything you need in my opinion.
Greets,
markey97
Edit: I can try to port this on my own but i think that i most likely need YOUR help. Just to have that said
Edit2: I mean the international S3 i9300
Edit3: Changed title
Edit4: Base for the kernel is there! Developement will start slowly in the following days/weeks and source will be pushed to github in some time.
Edit5: I will port this on my own, if anyone wants/ is willing to help me, PM me. I will show you my detailed progress here and will maybe give an ETA, but if i don't, don't ask for it since i also have private live, and i will code and provide you with info when I'm free and when i want to.
Feel free to post feature requests/suggestions over here in the thread!!

markey97 said:
Hey Guys and Girls!
I own this device since quite a short time and i wanted to ask if any developer is willing to port the 3.4.x kernel to our S3 since it would bring us some big performance, stability and security enhancements since we are stuck at 3.0.101. We would really profit of this as its much more actual and better for coming upgrades. Please correct me if there are already some devs trying to port this or if anything else is wrong.
My previous device was/is the Samsung Galaxy S Plus and we got a 3.4.x kernel that runs very well and gave us some big improvements. We officially only got Android 2.3.6 with a 2.6.x kernel and our great devs managed to found a dev team and to bring us a fully working 3.0.x and 3.4.x kernel and Android 4.0 to latest 4.4.
I could provide some github repositories and some more additional info if needed, just PM me if you want to start on this. I can't code or compile that much but i could provide nearly everything you need in my opinion.
Greets,
markey97
Edit: I can try to port this on my own but i think that i most likely need YOUR help. Just to have that said
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you talking about the S3 LTE phone? the one that has an exynos4 cpu? I'm definitely interested in this! I've been looking and trying to port over a 3.4.x+ kernel since the 3.0.101 is at EOL.

ztotherad said:
are you talking about the S3 LTE phone? the one that has an exynos4 cpu? I'm definitely interested in this! I've been looking and trying to port over a 3.4.x+ kernel since the 3.0.101 is at EOL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats exactly the way i think about it, we need a more actual kernel on our devices, not just a newer Android version to stay on the safe side, but i a also have to disappoint you, because i meant the i9300. But we could definitely together try to port it also to the i9305 which you meant, right?
Greets,
markey97

markey97 said:
Thats exactly the way i think about it, we need a more actual kernel on our devices, not just a newer Android version to stay on the safe side, but i a also have to disappoint you, because i meant the i9300. But we could definitely together try to port it also to the i9305 which you meant, right?
Greets,
markey97
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, sorry, in actually running the t0ltevzw (Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note 2). same processor, just clocked a tad higher. i looked at the sgs+ and saw it's running a Qualcomm cpu, so it may be harder to implement what the devs of the sgs+ put into affect, but I'm ready to learn and hack my way around.

Could anyone be so kind to enlighten me why this thread about "i9300" appeares in every note 2 forum on xda? each time i want to jump straight to i9300 it gets me first through all the note 2 forums. this is kind of silly.
am i the only one getting to see this thread in the note 2 forums?

nonyhaha said:
Could anyone be so kind to enlighten me why this thread about "i9300" appeares in every note 2 forum on xda? each time i want to jump straight to i9300 it gets me first through all the note 2 forums. this is kind of silly.
am i the only one getting to see this thread in the note 2 forums?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because this is the s3/note developer only forums.
edit: this get left in the dark?

ztotherad said:
because this is the s3/note developer only forums.
edit: this get left in the dark?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You mean if this thread is dead or the project abandoned?
No its not, i just don't have enough time to work on this till Christmas (school..arggh) but then i will try to port it in a time span of 2 weeks or so. Lol.
I'm searching for the source base and what I need to port it and then I will start when my holidays start. Yeeeah!:victory:
Greets:highfive:,
markey97

markey97 said:
You mean if this thread is dead or the project abandoned?
No its not, i just don't have enough time to work on this till Christmas (school..arggh) but then i will try to port it in a time span of 2 weeks or so. Lol.
I'm searching for the source base and what I need to port it and then I will start when my holidays start. Yeeeah!:victory:
Greets:highfive:,
markey97
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
deleted.

How are going to run propietary libs designed for 3.0 on 3.4?

GR0S said:
How are going to run propietary libs designed for 3.0 on 3.4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There aren't any
Gesendet von meinem GT-N7105 mit Tapatalk 2

How is this coming along, I could be interested at looking into this maybe

arj03 said:
How is this coming along, I could be interested at looking into this maybe
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i definitely second this!

galaxy s3 neo i9300i use 3.4x kernel and cpu exynos 4412
http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=sub&sub=F&searchValue=i9300i

The S Plus has the 3.4 Kernel for a long time now:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2165341
Sent from my GT-I9305 using xda app-developers app

blackcat67 said:
galaxy s3 neo i9300i use 3.4x kernel and cpu exynos 4412
http://opensource.samsung.com/reception/receptionSub.do?method=sub&sub=F&searchValue=i9300i
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That looks promising, big thanks for that info :highfive:
If that's real that it is a 3.4 kernel, our work could get a lot more easier. Downloading the code atm and will check it and report it. And if its 3.4, I will directly start to (try to) "port" it over so that we can have 3.4 kernel by the end of the next week! :thumbsup:

markey97 said:
That looks promising, big thanks for that info :highfive:
If that's real that it is a 3.4 kernel, our work could get a lot more easier. Downloading the code atm and will check it and report it. And if its 3.4, I will directly start to (try to) "port" it over so that we can have 3.4 kernel by the end of the next week! :thumbsup:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The devil kernel for the Note 2 variants has more of a "pseudo-" 3.4.x kernel. DerTeufel has implemented it, but not fully nor do I know if he's going to try to implement it fully.
The only thing that kills the Note 2 variants is that the s3 is OC'd at 1.2GHz while the Note 2 is OC'd at 1.6. but I'll have to check out the above file and see what I can do and possibly change to match the Note 2s.
Or if anyone knows of a device that has the exact same specs as the N710x and has a 3.4 kernel, PM me and I'll respond accordingly!
thanks!

ztotherad said:
The devil kernel for the Note 2 variants has more of a "pseudo-" 3.4.x kernel. DerTeufel has implemented it, but not fully nor do I know if he's going to try to implement it fully.
The only thing that kills the Note 2 variants is that the s3 is OC'd at 1.2GHz while the Note 2 is OC'd at 1.6. but I'll have to check out the above file and see what I can do and possibly change to match the Note 2s.
Or if anyone knows of a device that has the exact same specs as the N710x and has a 3.4 kernel, PM me and I'll respond accordingly!
thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha I know that, I'm working together with him
He ported over a whole bunch of "features/updates" from the original 3.4 Kernel and he/we mostlikely want(s) to fully implement everything.
That's no problem at all 'cause DerTeufel will/can easily adapt it to the corresponding device. And the S3's (i9300) standard clock speed is 1.4 GHz
Elsewhere I think all other components are (nearly) the same.

markey97 said:
Haha I know that, I'm working together with him
He ported over a whole bunch of "features/updates" from the original 3.4 Kernel and he/we mostlikely want(s) to fully implement everything.
That's no problem at all 'cause DerTeufel will/can easily adapt it to the corresponding device. And the S3's (i9300) standard clock speed is 1.4 GHz
Elsewhere I think all other components are (nearly) the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, with the i9300 international version of the S3, I believe we've got the same CPU, maybe same RAM [but I'm thinking the ram on the i9300 is 1.5GB while on the Note 2 it's 2GB]. idk, I'm going to download the neo source code and check it out later since i'm about to leave to go to work.

ztotherad said:
yeah, with the i9300 international version of the S3, I believe we've got the same CPU, maybe same RAM [but I'm thinking the ram on the i9300 is 1.5GB while on the Note 2 it's 2GB]. idk, I'm going to download the neo source code and check it out later since i'm about to leave to go to work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
s3 has 1 gb ram with exynos 4 soc
s3 neo has 1.5 gb ram with qualcomm soc
Sent from F2FS FORMATED I9300XXUGNB6 NeatROM v7.2 + AGNi pureSTOCK v3.6 kernel

psndna88 said:
s3 has 1 gb ram with exynos 4 soc
s3 neo has 1.5 gb ram with qualcomm soc
Sent from F2FS FORMATED I9300XXUGNB6 NeatROM v7.2 + AGNi pureSTOCK v3.6 kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
which all together = no 3.4 love for the Note 2 damn you samsung! why can't you give us some love! lol.
needless to say though, I'm glad to see that DerTeufel has been able to pseudo-implement the 3.4 kernel into his source. I'm also grateful for our kernel love that awesome devs give us.

We want cm ROM. " Please turn off topic "

We want cm ROM for SM-N900. get support please quote
I am sorry Dr. Ketan - VN team - murat25750 - Alba1986 - lidroid-criskelo. We love you but we want cm rom
Thank you
Tapatalk **NOTE 3 Dr.ketan K5 Rom S5 TEMA*** OS 4.4.2 KitKat**
Android rom yükleme, root etme, recovery flaşlama, bootloader işlemleri
Samsung, HTC, LG, Sony ve MTK Replika cihazlar

+1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111

I really got hope after getting CM on LTE models but now really sad for our N900. Why? Why?
+1 to get CM on our phone

phyowaiummg said:
I really got hope after getting CM on LTE models but now really sad for our N900. Why? Why?
+1 to get CM on our phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+11111
I asked this question before but I am not sure which sources are not available for Note3 to make CM rom and why samsung is not releasing those sources ?

alien0101 said:
+11111
I asked this question before but I am not sure which sources are not available for Note3 to make CM rom and why samsung is not releasing those sources ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We have best rom and kernel developers for stock base rom although they are cooking without the team. On my previous phone,S advance(I9070) they start CM from the scratch and now BOOM! Please someone expert kindly explains why we can't get CM. No sources?

Its been months now of waiting for a vanilla android to come out on n900...I hope there is a dev that can assist us with some AOSP
Sent from my SM-N900 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

yeah and i have made up my mind not to buy international version of galaxy note series next time because of lack of CM Rom support or i'll shift to sony
used note 1 and note 2 neither of them had this problem
but this time samsung screwed us

+1
N900 only has 4-5 developers and this is disapointing

+111111111111111111111111111

CM is available here and they also have an excellent wiki that explains how to build. I highly suggest giving it a try if you wish to have it.
However, posting requests and/or demands for a ROM in the development sections is inappropriate. This section is only for sharing something you've developed or are currently working on.
Thread Closed.

[Q] Question Android 4.4

Hi, look I'm new in this page and I have a Samsung Galaxy Core I8260, and I want to know how to install the Android 4.4 version?
I was looking for doing with cyanogenmod, can anyone help me please?? :angel::angel:
THANKS!!

There is no 4.4 for galaxy core...only modified stock ROMs.not even 4.2
Cm11 have lot of bugs.

It's a LOT of work.
The drivers for Galaxy Core hardware don't even exist in the newer kernels anymore.
If so many guys want it done by some, at least part time, consider pooling your money.
Asking nicely does nothing, as it's hard, specialized, intellectual work, and not a day of it at that.