Related
Please sign these petitions to make motorola atleast look at us
Motorola is very good in fake promising
But we will force them to do things!!!!
This one is to force motorola unlock the bootloaders
This one is to tell motorola that this will be the last purchase of moto phones if they dont unlock the bootloaders
This one is to make them release an ics update for defy
And finally this one is to help other people who bought their products
Motorola triumph..Help them too please
Force moto release an gingerbread update for triumph
We devs need to thrive hard to make motorola get most of their phones an unlocked bootloader!!
We should stand as one army and thrive hard!!!!!
please for god sake sign these petitions!
Please don't let this die
Sent from my MB525 using Tapatalk 2
pjgowtham said:
Please don't let this die
Sent from my MB525 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No offence but ........ lol
Buhahahahahahahaha
You guys want the honest truth, majority of Motorolas sold, for example the RAZR are not to techies but to everyone. Majority of my customers don't even know what a BL is and let alone how it affects them. As much as I would like to go back to Motorola, these petitions will never have the same effect as the HTC ones a while back ago. But who knows, maybe Google will implement some changes regarding way locked BLs.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
vote with your wallet
Personally, I think the best way to petition motorola is to vote with your wallet and refuse to buy their products. Moto will only change their bootloader policies and lack of timely updates is if they see their actions have a negative effect on their sales. So instead of signing a petition, buy an HTC device that is unlockable with the official HTC bootloader unlock tool or buy a Galaxy Nexus. They won't react to an online petition, but they will react if developers convince their friends to stop buying products from a company that breaks promises and is hostile to development efforts.
mossman44 said:
Personally, I think the best way to petition motorola is to vote with your wallet and refuse to buy their products. Moto will only change their bootloader policies and lack of timely updates is if they see their actions have a negative effect on their sales. So instead of signing a petition, buy an HTC device that is unlockable with the official HTC bootloader unlock tool or buy a Galaxy Nexus. They won't react to an online petition, but they will react if developers convince their friends to stop buying products from a company that breaks promises and is hostile to development efforts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not trying to be mean or discerning but that will not work either. Devs/techies and their families only makeup a small percentage of the buying field. Best option is to slam Motorola with filed complaints on the Better Business Bureau website then they will respond.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
The reason I'm trying hard to get votes is that Google has little influence over Motorola and This might change something
Sent from my MB525 using Tapatalk 2
There was a similar action with Sony Ericsson, the x10 community basically pounded the SE official site, petitioned, emailed, and generally publicly highlighted SE's failure to provide support or development. It worked, eventually, but SE(obviously now Sony) were a different proposition from Motorola as in the x10 was their first android phone and their share of the smartphone market was relatively small compared to Motorola, so they had more to lose, so to speak.
Hello everyone, in Spanish forum called htcmania we starts a petition to remove knox warranty void. Please go to the link. Thanks
https://www.change.org/es/peticione...-samsung-녹스-시스템을-제거합니다-최근에-새-소프트웨어-업데이트에서합니다#
Enviado desde mi SM-N9005 usando Tapatalk
You can get a million signatures and i doubt it well change a thing. Sad, but true
Sent from my DROID RAZR using xda app-developers app
SgtGoldy said:
You can get a million signatures and i doubt it well change a thing. Sad, but true
Sent from my DROID RAZR using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I doubt too, but if anyone make nothing about it, nothing changes. It's only a minute!
Enviado desde mi SM-N9005 usando Tapatalk
kandem said:
Yes I doubt too, but if anyone make nothing about it, nothing changes. It's only a minute!
Enviado desde mi SM-N9005 usando Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my DROID RAZR using xda app-developers app
SgtGoldy said:
You can get a million signatures and i doubt it well change a thing. Sad, but true
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Knox is a great idea for everyone outside XDA. It supports BYOD so people can use a single device for their personal stuff while giving corporate IT the security they require for their stuff that co-exists on an employees phone. So employees don't have to carry around two separate phones and are always connected via a single voice and data connection for their business and personal communication. For non-business users, because Knox lives at the bootloader level, it prevents the wiping of a lost or stolen phone. I connect to multiple secure networks and haven't been able to root my phones for over a year so for me and those like me Knox is no big deal and most likely a benefit. I'll miss rooting to do stuff and then unrooting and still being able to keep "official" status but it is what it is.
Knox has been so well received in the B2B market LG is introducing something similar - LG Gate
http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/article/528187/smartphone_vendors_target_byod_enterprises/
There are tens of millions of devices that can be sold B2B and about 5M "enthusiasts" on XDA who Samsung by their behavior think are expendable. Knox is here to stay so those impacted by it should send Samsung a message and not buy their devices. A petition won't change a thing.
BarryH_GEG said:
Knox is a great idea for everyone outside XDA. It supports BYOD so people can use a single device for their personal stuff while giving corporate IT the security they require for their stuff that co-exists on an employees phone. So employees don't have to carry around two separate phones and are always connected via a single voice and data connection for their business and personal communication. For non-business users, because Knox lives at the bootloader level, it prevents the wiping of a lost or stolen phone. I connect to multiple secure networks and haven't been able to root my phones for over a year so for me and those like me Knox is no big deal and most likely a benefit. I'll miss rooting to do stuff and then unrooting and still being able to keep "official" status but it is what it is.
Knox has been so well received in the B2B market LG is introducing something similar - LG Gate
http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/article/528187/smartphone_vendors_target_byod_enterprises/
There are tens of millions of devices that can be sold B2B and about 5M "enthusiasts" on XDA who Samsung by their behavior think are expendable. Knox is here to stay so those impacted by it should send Samsung a message and not buy their devices. A petition won't change a thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would be nice if it were something you could opt into during checkout or during your purchase of the device. I see the benefits to people who aren't about roms and rooting but it seriously inconveniences those of us who are :laugh:
SgtGoldy said:
It would be nice if it were something you could opt into during checkout or during your purchase of the device. I see the benefits to people who aren't about roms and rooting but it seriously inconveniences those of us who are :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I posted the "happy" stuff. There's a definite f-u message to the dev community in that Samsung moved the warranty flag to Knox where it's now tamper resistant. They didn't need to do that for anything security related. So Knox or not Samsung's not exactly embracing "enthusiasts."
I'm glad people are starting a petition. It's a petition that got our bootloaders unlocked for our asus prime? Or tf700...cant remember cuz I have both but the fact is the community got it unlocked.
monkey10120 said:
I'm glad people are starting a petition. It's a petition that got our bootloaders unlocked for our asus prime? Or tf700...cant remember cuz I have both but the fact is the community got it unlocked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true and when I unlocked my bootloader it said my warranty was voided but when I had an issue with the internal battery they replaced even though the warranty was voided. I guess it depends on the problem in which the warranty is voided.
Hopefully Samsung can be more specific with what's voided and what's not.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
jetbruceli said:
This is true and when I unlocked my bootloader it said my warranty was voided but when I had an issue with the internal battery they replaced even though the warranty was voided. I guess it depends on the problem in which the warranty is voided.
Hopefully Samsung can be more specific with what's voided and what's not.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I remember the argument people had with the warranty too. I'm glad that they fixed the battery because it was hardware related and not software which is why this voided warranty for unlocked devices is ridiculous.
monkey10120 said:
I remember the argument people had with the warranty too. I'm glad that they fixed the battery because it was hardware related and not software which is why this voided warranty for unlocked devices is ridiculous.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was great Asus did that but I said it in the email and on the Form that I had unlocked it and rooted. They fixed it with no questions. And I am sure with this knox thing we will still get our stuff fixed as long as it's truly their malfunction
Sent from my SM-N9005 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Signed the petition.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk 2
The real alternative here is an AOSP or Developer edition Note. Samsung is trying to entrench in Enterprise, Knox is their lever. They won't be removing it.
BarryH_GEG said:
Knox is a great idea for everyone outside XDA. It supports BYOD so people can use a single device for their personal stuff while giving corporate IT the security they require for their stuff that co-exists on an employees phone. So employees don't have to carry around two separate phones and are always connected via a single voice and data connection for their business and personal communication. For non-business users, because Knox lives at the bootloader level, it prevents the wiping of a lost or stolen phone. I connect to multiple secure networks and haven't been able to root my phones for over a year so for me and those like me Knox is no big deal and most likely a benefit. I'll miss rooting to do stuff and then unrooting and still being able to keep "official" status but it is what it is.
Knox has been so well received in the B2B market LG is introducing something similar - LG Gate
http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/article/528187/smartphone_vendors_target_byod_enterprises/
There are tens of millions of devices that can be sold B2B and about 5M "enthusiasts" on XDA who Samsung by their behavior think are expendable. Knox is here to stay so those impacted by it should send Samsung a message and not buy their devices. A petition won't change a thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This... The enthusiast community is a very very small segment of the population and Knox is a feature that is sold to the community at large, especially buisnesses wary of android's reputation for malware and security problems (wether true or not, it's what's out there). Get used to this, because eventually all phones will be locked down like this. Companies may lose the enthusiast segment but they gain the far larger and more profitable business market. If anyone thinks that's not an easy choice, you're kidding yourself.
LOL, I thought someone is publishing the digital signatures for a Knox bit free boot loader....
Signed
Galaxy Note 3 | SM-9005 | Tapatalk
BarryH_GEG said:
Knox is a great idea for everyone outside XDA. It supports BYOD so people can use a single device for their personal stuff while giving corporate IT the security they require for their stuff that co-exists on an employees phone. So employees don't have to carry around two separate phones and are always connected via a single voice and data connection for their business and personal communication. For non-business users, because Knox lives at the bootloader level, it prevents the wiping of a lost or stolen phone. I connect to multiple secure networks and haven't been able to root my phones for over a year so for me and those like me Knox is no big deal and most likely a benefit. I'll miss rooting to do stuff and then unrooting and still being able to keep "official" status but it is what it is.
Knox has been so well received in the B2B market LG is introducing something similar - LG Gate
http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/article/528187/smartphone_vendors_target_byod_enterprises/
There are tens of millions of devices that can be sold B2B and about 5M "enthusiasts" on XDA who Samsung by their behavior think are expendable. Knox is here to stay so those impacted by it should send Samsung a message and not buy their devices. A petition won't change a thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem is not that Knox is bad or not , the problem is that consumers don't have a choice. The sad truth is this is happening everywhere from food to computers. I agree that we should do something but I personally think it's already too late.
jetbruceli said:
And I am sure with this knox thing we will still get our stuff fixed as long as it's truly their malfunction
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I doubt that very much.
They'll take one look at it and bounce it back as null and void.
I am planning to buy Note 3, I already have S4 with older rom and bootloader (canadian variant).
So I understand (somewhat) this Knox system.
If I do get Note 3, I can't install custom recovery and flash custom roms?
What would flag the Knox system, the warranty becoming void, is it installing custom recovery, or rom? What about the rooting, does that affect knox as well?
Signed ?
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk now Free
hello!
we all make a great community. many of whom will you be unhappy with Samsung's initiative to use the consequences KNOX we already know ..
if we want to be prisoners, we bought the iphone ...
so.. this is the idea:
SAMSUNG: Remove the Knox system. On recently in new Software Updates.
http://goo.gl/kbIAyj
link original: http://www.htcmania.com/showthread.php?t=690492
Won't happen the rreason is good why the use it. For safety
However it's not liked for developers
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4
Neahhhh.... We are too small for this big game is up to us to find a solution
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
excellent idea; I will be joining the effort .
Sent from my GT-I9505
+1 We have to share this petition and publish in different media, forums, blogs etc... By the way signing and moving wont stop some people to find a B plan or solution without the help of Samsung.
Im seriously thinking of changing my s4 to a nexus 5... If we wanted propietary software wed have bought a nice iphone
Hate to say this but this petition thing will never work. Sorry but spinky360 was right.
If you really wanted freedom from locked bootloaders and all that, buy a nexus. That's just how it is.
I wish you luck. You're gonna need it
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4
chickentuna said:
Hate to say this but this petition thing will never work. Sorry but spinky360 was right.
If you really wanted freedom from locked bootloaders and all that, buy a nexus. That's just how it is.
I wish you luck. You're gonna need it
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would have bought Nexus if, 1) Samsung had been straight with its end users at the time of purchase and 2) seeing as Kitkat update to S4 will also region lock the device =(
I am now rocking an HTC one. I like it.
chickentuna said:
Hate to say this but this petition thing will never work. Sorry but spinky360 was right.
If you really wanted freedom from locked bootloaders and all that, buy a nexus. That's just how it is.
I wish you luck. You're gonna need it
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I don’t agree that we cannot make a change. If you read a book like The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference , you will come to see that even though Samsung spend around 4 billion $ for marketing , the final say is in the hand of the consumers . Currently if you look around the s4 forum, the note 3 forum, and other forums around of the web you will see that people are unsatisfied with what Samsung is doing, and they are advising people away from Samsung.
For one, I know that I can directly influence 50 of my friends and I made sure to contact each and every one of them about Samsung new policies and advised them against any future purchase of a Samsung device. I also contacted some blogs explaining the issues that we have with Samsung - I have yet to hear a word from them - so even though Samsung can pay its way around the web to silence some critiques , it cannot affect the social binding , and the negative social vibe generated around its products . So let’s wait and see if Samsung will stay arrogant and fall like blackberry, nokia , palm … and any other too big for consumer company did , or whether they are going to start making some changes .
63or63 said:
hello!
we all make a great community. many of whom will you be unhappy with Samsung's initiative to use the consequences KNOX we already know ..
if we want to be prisoners, we bought the iphone ...
so.. this is the idea:
SAMSUNG: Remove the Knox system. On recently in new Software Updates.
http://goo.gl/kbIAyj
link original: http://www.htcmania.com/showthread.php?t=690492
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pointless. Millions of phones are sold and only a hand full of rooters.
chickentuna said:
Hate to say this but this petition thing will never work. Sorry but spinky360 was right.
If you really wanted freedom from locked bootloaders and all that, buy a nexus. That's just how it is.
I wish you luck. You're gonna need it
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
man!
I buy a samsung galaxy from the first that came out! always done with what I please! ROM metia you were pre-beta just to try!
with this, we put a barrier samsung and limits us to do what they want!
where it stayed that have Android to be free?
you say you buy a Nexus if I do not go through what we are subjected samsung .. do not you think you're thinking the wrong way? you are undergoing something you limited without any claim?
rings at David vs. Goliath, but at least you will know that there are a handful of unhappy with this new security policy, which on one hand is very good, but on the other, baaaaaaad!
we know that many end users do not even know it's a ROM, let alone answer if you have rooteado or not .. but we are the damned geeks what we like tinkering with what we buy ..
that's the point. perhaps not even make this request out of the desk, but at least we did not stay silent.
For one, the English version of the petition is rather unreadable due to poor punctuation and grammatical errors.
But the real problem is that KNOX itself isn't the problem but how Samsung has decided to inform the companies that handle the warranty repairs. Their line is simply "if there are any 0x1 flags then no warranty". The KNOX flag itself should only mean one thing: that the device was tampered with and its security compromised (important information for corporate IT departments) but it should have no bearing to hardware repairs as these are two separate things.
Done
Enviado do meu GT-I9505 utilizando Tapatalk 4
I think this "petition" threads should be closed and deleted on XDA ... it obviously never changed anything. I signed so many and it never helped (last one was "HTC One X S-Off petition"). I dont think Samsung nor HTC gives a **** about flasher and custom ROM users like us. They need us just for beta testing when they throw us some "leaks" (like a bone to a dog).
Hi guys,
i just wanted to know if there's a way to send a petition with a lot of signatures to samsung , against knox and warranty checker.
I see what you're trying to do but Samsung won't care
if Samsung cared about users then we wouldn't have those things in the first place(or at least they would have been implemented differently)
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk
hate this kind of thing , i will just move to sell this device..android is open. They are making it close.. i will just buy a nexus device next time
and it gets worst with the region lock on unlocked devices
i mean why the F*** sell unlocked devices if they're still locked, samsung is little by little taking away user freedom
so im going Sony next year, i would now but money is short
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk
i will just get a nexus device.. nothing else.
there is an ongoing petition against knox in the general forum ;you can join the effort and feel free to create another one i m sure to support your quest
carmeloseven said:
i will just get a nexus device.. nothing else.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nexus is also a locked down device IMO, no removable battery, no extSD card, poor camera.
I'm also going to jump ship to Sony.
difyel said:
there is an ongoing petition against knox in the general forum ;you can join the effort and feel free to create another one i m sure to support your quest
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously?
Samsung will wipe their ass with our petitions....
Correct me if I'm wrong but you guys jumping ship to sony, aren't sony devices bootloader locked as well? And unlocking it leaves a permanent mark which cannot be reverted. Therefore, voiding your warranty
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Dean-xXx said:
Seriously?
Samsung will wipe their ass with our petitions....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably but it s more about creating brand awareness .Also pragmatically speaking a company which is snob vis a vis its consumers will fail . Reality check Blackberry , you can visit the crackberry forum to see the level of unhappiness consumers had to understand why this company which had only deaf ears to its consumers is going bankrupt .
According to the firewater twitter account (the same one that showed off the vzw s5 bootloader unlock) there is a vulnerability in the TrustZone kernel/snapdragon 805 devices. While the s5 doesn't have an 805 it does appear to have TrustZone, which, according to beaups, once again the same person who showed off the bl unlock, there is probably a way to unlock the bl on the s5. Apparently it's similar to how the droid turbo was unlocked, and it lists other devices that use the 805 that could benefit. Although the s5 isn't listed, I'm assuming this is similar (if not the same) method he used to unlock the s5 previously. The only problem is he left off before the exploit can be completed, so people will have to work off of his research. Anyone who can understand what this means and perhaps develop something, take a look here at some documentation he released on the subject.
I looked at the PDF and I wouldn't bank on it. If the exploit is in our device I would be surprised.
Sent from my SM-G900V using XDA Free mobile app
@jcase can someone who knows a thing or two about this get in here and see if this is a possibility?
mrjiggywiggy said:
According to the firewater twitter account (the same one that showed off the vzw s5 bootloader unlock) there is a vulnerability in the TrustZone kernel/snapdragon 805 devices. While the s5 doesn't have an 805 it does appear to have TrustZone, which, according to beaups, once again the same person who showed off the bl unlock, there is probably a way to unlock the bl on the s5. Apparently it's similar to how the droid turbo was unlocked, and it lists other devices that use the 805 that could benefit. Although the s5 isn't listed, I'm assuming this is similar (if not the same) method he used to unlock the s5 previously. The only problem is he left off before the exploit can be completed, so people will have to work off of his research. Anyone who can understand what this means and perhaps develop something, take a look here at some documentation he released on the subject.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hariiiii said:
@jcase can someone who knows a thing or two about this get in here and see if this is a possibility?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I work closely with beaups, we are the authors of SunShine, the app that unlocks the droid turbo. I find it VERY hard to believe beaups told you there is a route to unlock the s5 through the Trustzone, I call bullpoop on that.
This vulnerability will never lead to an unlock on the S5, nor are we actively looking into it.
jcase said:
I work closely with beaups, we are the authors of SunShine, the app that unlocks the droid turbo. I find it VERY hard to believe beaups told you there is a route to unlock the s5 through the Trustzone, I call bullpoop on that.
This vulnerability will never lead to an unlock on the S5, nor are we actively looking into it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it was nice to dream for a bit anyways. Thanks for clearing things up jcase.
jcase said:
I work closely with beaups, we are the authors of SunShine, the app that unlocks the droid turbo. I find it VERY hard to believe beaups told you there is a route to unlock the s5 through the Trustzone, I call bullpoop on that.
This vulnerability will never lead to an unlock on the S5, nor are we actively looking into it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok so based on the video I've seen of him unlocking a VZW S5 bootloader can you tell us if an unlock has been discovered or on its way?
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
I think the video answers the question about if an unlock "has been discovered". No plans for release at this time.
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
beaups said:
I think the video answers the question about if an unlock "has been discovered". No plans for release at this time.
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Makes sense. But if you don't mind me asking, whatever exploit that you are using, is that S5 specific or have you tried on other Sammy devices such as N3?
Walter.White said:
Makes sense. But if you don't mind me asking, whatever exploit that you are using, is that S5 specific or have you tried on other Sammy devices such as N3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It might work on other models; I don't own any other Samsung devices, so I didn't really research it much further.
--beaups
beaups said:
It might work on other models; I don't own any other Samsung devices, so I didn't really research it much further.
--beaups
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just out of curiosity what would happen if you flashed another boot loader or whatever it was that unlocked the boot loader on other phones? would it hard brick our phone? or is this something you go into your phone manually to do?
Veid71 said:
just out of curiosity what would happen if you flashed another boot loader or whatever it was that unlocked the boot loader on other phones? would it hard brick our phone? or is this something you go into your phone manually to do?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can verify that it will hard brick the phone. At least it did when I accidentally attempted on a Galaxy S4.
Why isn't the method used to unlock the VZW S5 being released? Or was that just a faked video?
Thorkle said:
Why isn't the method used to unlock the VZW S5 being released? Or was that just a faked video?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm thinking it was faked since they won't release it.
jjdavis699 said:
I'm thinking it was faked since they won't release it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course it wasn't faked. Beaups is beyond reproach in this regard.
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
jjdavis699 said:
I'm thinking it was faked since they won't release it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Give me a break.
jjdavis699 said:
I'm thinking it was faked since they won't release it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i really dont think its faked but i am quite curious as to why it hasnt been released maybe he doesnt want them to patch it and hes waiting for the next big version update to release it or like everyones said maybe its illegal im not sure yet
Veid71 said:
i really dont think its faked but i am quite curious as to why it hasnt been released maybe he doesnt want them to patch it and hes waiting for the next big version update to release it or like everyones said maybe its illegal im not sure yet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There could be a few things. Fear of a lawsuit, they may want to test it further, they may want to see if it can be used on other devices, they may want to see if anyone else can figure it out, etc. Sure they could sell unlocks on a per device basis but if big red wants to sue them, no amount of money made from selling the bootloader unlocks will pay for a court case or what verizon would want in "damages" even though we should be allowed to unlock the devices we paid for, which in turn would be a good argument for their defense in court which they might win with.
Who knows?
jjdavis699 said:
I'm thinking it was faked since they won't release it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK look, I regret saying that. I was really tired. Beaups, if I offended you in some way, forgive me. I just got this phone and just want to get root.
gmerdude said:
Why is this still being talked about.......?
Sent from my SM-G900V
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because the community still wants it.
---------- Post added at 06:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:05 PM ----------
jjdavis699 said:
Because the community still wants it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anyway, @beaups, I'm asking you as a fellow XDA member, who has been around for a long time, to please, give us the tools we need to make our device a playground. I'd love to be able to get a custom rom on my new phone, but without a bl unlock, I can't! My old Moto G, I went so as far as paying for your wonderful SunShine tool. I'm asking you, as a fellow nerd, to give us the keys to the kingdom. If you want someone to test the unlock, I'm ready and willing. I'm not afraid of Odin. If you want to keep it private, I respect that. Just release it to those who want it, maybe in a PM.
jjdavis699 said:
Because the community still wants it.
---------- Post added at 06:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:05 PM ----------
Anyway, @beaups, I'm asking you as a fellow XDA member, who has been around for a long time, to please, give us the tools we need to make our device a playground. I'd love to be able to get a custom rom on my new phone, but without a bl unlock, I can't! My old Moto G, I went so as far as paying for your wonderful SunShine tool. I'm asking you, as a fellow nerd, to give us the keys to the kingdom. If you want someone to test the unlock, I'm ready and willing. I'm not afraid of Odin. If you want to keep it private, I respect that. Just release it to those who want it, maybe in a PM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not know the persons involved, or see the video, but if they did unlock the BL damn right!! :thumbup::thumbup::beer::beer:
Goes to show there's always a way and makes me happy to know it was done. Where's that bounty $$ at??
Anyway - if it's not being released there's a reason as I'm sure it wasn't a cake walk. I for one when I make a music track after some hard work need to enjoy it a bit before I serve the dish.
Don't worry S5 fam --
Nice work beaups / crew!
Sent from my still locked down SM-G900V running PHX V10!