This is an open question for all the mods. I just want to know what's the status of the INVESTIGATION on Andiroxu's kernel sources? His thread has been locked by @GermainZ for over a month and half and still no updates?
@justmpm mentioned that his sources are not available, but after checking I found that they are available here
https://github.com/ajaybhatia/canvas2
So please let us know any update that you have..
ibshar said:
This is an open question for all the mods. I just want to know what's the status of the INVESTIGATION on Andiroxu's kernel sources? His thread has been locked by @GermainZ for over a month and half and still no updates?
@justmpm mentioned that his sources are not available, but after checking I found that they are available here
https://github.com/ajaybhatia/canvas2
So please let us know any update that you have..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mutiny,
M with you @ibshar...
Vote for @andiroxu .. vote for @andiroxu ...
Is this investigation being done by Indian police? Coz if its taking time than must be our police..
Edit :what: I edited the tag
Sent from my Nexus using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
jaunty said:
Mutiny,
M with you @ibshar...
Vote for @Abdiroxu.. vote for @Abdiroxu...
Is this investigation being done by Indian police? Coz if its taking time than must be our police..
Sent from my Nexus using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dude you tagged the wrong guy... it's Vote for @andiroxu
Yes Bro @ibshar M With U, @jaunty & @andiroxu Too . Great Thinking By You Bro Really @ibshar.
I Also Wanted To Know The Investigation Status But Wasn't Able To Know Mods Please Answer Our Question.
Sent from my Micromax A250 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
ibshar said:
This is an open question for all the mods. I just want to know what's the status of the INVESTIGATION on Andiroxu's kernel sources? His thread has been locked by @GermainZ for over a month and half and still no updates?
@justmpm mentioned that his sources are not available, but after checking I found that they are available here
https://github.com/ajaybhatia/canvas2
So please let us know any update that you have..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree man. Mods are making me sick.
Reopen @andiroxu's thread :good:
I'm sorry but I can not comment on the state of the investigation and neither can GermainZ. Thanks for pointing out those sources, I will check to see if there is anything new and exciting .
I have always done my best to help all the developers get their work done and I am really proud of the ROM developers for this device, because your OEM has been less than 0% helpful. However, please be aware that a kernel that is not GPL compliant is warez and because xda was built by developers, xda takes a very strict stance on warez and on upholding the tenants and spirit of the GPL. That means that posting links, PMing, opening support threads, or even just asking some one to give it to you are all against xda rule #6.
justmpm said:
I'm sorry but I can not comment on the state of the investigation and neither can GermainZ. Thanks for pointing out those sources, I will check to see if there is anything new and exciting .
I have always done my best to help all the developers get their work done and I am really proud of the ROM developers for this device, because your OEM has been less than 0% helpful. However, please be aware that a kernel that is not GPL compliant is warez and because xda was built by developers, xda takes a very strict stance on warez and on upholding the tenants and spirit of the GPL. That means that posting links, PMing, opening support threads, or even just asking some one to give it to you are all against xda rule #6.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@justmpm bro I know you are the most developer friendly mod for our Canvas 2 and I respect you a lot and appreciate all your support in our development threads.. :good:
But I think your are mistaken. The reason why Andiroxu's kernel thread was closed is because Varun Chitre suspected that his Thunderzap 2.0 kernels code had been used without his permission.
QUOTE by Varun
Dear Ajay Bhatia,
I need to sound a bit rude here now.
First of all the kernel sources you posted DO NOT reflect your kernel build. This makes a huge violation to the GPL terms. You are trying to cheat the XDA Moderation Committee and all other developers. Simply uploading some other sources and altering the Makefile to reflect the kernel version number does not make it a 3.4.5 kernel. You are either fooling users here under the name of an upgraded kernel OR you are tricking the complete GPL system and the moderators here by uploading some other sources
2. Most important thing now, I never came into public like this for such purposes because I never met people like you. YOU ARE USING various patches from my kernel repository without proper acknowledgment and credits. The most important here is the vermagic hack which I author right from ThunderZap for ICS days. Without that fix you cannot change a DARN thing in kernel. You cannot set a name for your kernel, you cannot upgrade it to upstream levels due to vermagic string mismatches in the kernel which results into an unbootable build.
Now I am beginning to doubt that you are using COMPLETE ThunderZap 3.4.5 upgraded commitbase, if this is not the case, come-on tell me how many conflicts did you face while upgrading? How did you fix the dev_unlock issue while making a transition from 3.4.2-->3.4.3 ? Prove it.
GPL allows everyone's code to be used and modified for free but that doesn't mean no work was spent to do that. Till now you were just violating GPL by uploading only directories that had modified files but now when you are found to be using patches that I author without properly acknowledging it then this is a thing which I do NOT tolerate. I straight way call this stealing.
I require transparency in everything dealing with GPL, but in this case neither your kernel nor your sources are so.
REPORTED
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now whether this is true or not it does not make this kernel a warez as there is no PAID version of this kernel in the market.! I am just going by the XDA Rules definition of warez listed in Rule 6
6. Do not post warez.
If a piece of software requires you to pay to use it, then pay for it. We do not accept warez nor do we permit any member to request, promote or describe ways in which Warez, cracks, serial codes or other means of avoiding payment, can be obtained. This is a site of developers, i.e. the sort of people who create such software. When you cheat a software developer, you cheat us as a community
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I beleive the rule that you think was broken by Andiroxu is XDA Rule #12 - Using the work of others
But if this is so, then please confirm it and let us know... :angel::fingers-crossed:
I am all in for GPL compliance and open source, but I would request you to be as open as possible about this investigation as well.
ibshar said:
@justmpm bro I know you are the most developer friendly mod for our Canvas 2 and I respect you a lot and appreciate all your support in our development threads.. :good:
But I think your are mistaken. The reason why Andiroxu's kernel thread was closed is because Varun Chitre suspected that his Thunderzap 2.0 kernels code had been used without his permission.
QUOTE by Varun
Now whether this is true or not it does not make this kernel a warez as there is no PAID version of this kernel in the market.! I am just going by the XDA Rules definition of warez listed in Rule 6
I beleive the rule that you think was broken by Andiroxu is XDA Rule #12 - Using the work of others
But if this is so, then please confirm it and let us know... :angel::fingers-crossed:
I am all in for GPL compliance and open source, but I would request you to be as open as possible about this investigation as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for any confusion. As I said, I can't really talk about what is going on with that kernel. I mentioned rule #6 in regards to all the people posting down load links, or offering to PM people, or asking for people to PM them a copy of a non GPL compliant kernel. It is considered warez, because the GPL requires that anybody who works on the the linux kernel (or other GPL protected code) to share the developments that they have made. This is the "price" you pay for being able to use the work of all the previous kernel developers.
Originally Posted by ibshar<br />
@justmpm bro I know you are the most developer friendly mod for our Canvas 2 and I respect you a lot and appreciate all your support in our development threads.. :good:<br />
<br />
But I think your are mistaken. The reason why <b>Andiroxu's </b>kernel thread was <b>closed </b>is because <b>Varun Chitre</b> suspected that his <b>Thunderzap 2.0 kernels code</b> had been used without his permission. <br />
<br />
QUOTE by Varun<br />
<br />
<br />
<b>Now whether this is true or not it does not make this kernel a <font color="DarkRed">warez </font>as there is no PAID version of this kernel in the market.! I am just going by the XDA Rules definition of warez listed in Rule 6</b><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
I beleive the rule that you think was broken by Andiroxu is XDA Rule #12 - Using the work of others<br />
But if this is so, then please confirm it and let us know... :angel::fingers-crossed:<br />
<b>I am all in for GPL compliance and open source, but I would request you to be as open as possible about this investigation as well.</b>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
<br />
<br />
<br />
Sorry for any confusion. As I said, I can't really talk about what is going on with that kernel. I mentioned rule #6 in regards to all the people posting down load links, or offering to PM people, or asking for people to PM them a copy of a non GPL compliant kernel. It is considered warez, because the GPL requires that anybody who works on the the linux kernel (or other GPL protected code) to share the developments that they have made. This is the "price" you pay for being able to use the work of all the previous kernel developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But code is in front of you. I even PM you about it about a month ago and you told me that you will compile it to know whether its fake or not. But you never turned back. Now this is thing of prestige.
You are spreading a wrong about me labeling me as a "CHEATER". Just tell me everything is in front of you with all source code and you are telling I am cheater. How come?
Kindly explain if the submission of source code on a public website as public repo doesn't make it open source? Due this behaviour sometimes I even feel not to make further commits. Now you tell me whether you want to curb the development or help it to continue?
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
Yes, please solve this matter coz its very unpleasant to flash a rom without kernel,
Now, it's like drunk driving We getting boot loops, force closes, app installing issues, some get 3G call issue, OTG issue and many more coz we can't have Change log of kernel and issues related to. It and at one place.
Allegations by varun have took us to the past when we were asking for link to same.
A kernel developer who is working hard has to spread his work like this it's embarrassing, for himself and his dedication.
I seriously respect @andiroxu and I can't see his work to be called by some other words than appreciation.
I want to use my RIGHT TO INFORMATION, if it's available on XDA :what: to know about the results of investigation or the state of investigation.
Sent from my Nexus using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I will only say this.
Give proper credits, and you will have my respect
yeah im talking to you @andiroxu
There is no way you could compile that kernel, without varun.chitre15 commits, and patches.
Im not saying you didnt added some work on that Kernel, but saying It's all your work, it's just lying
As for the rest of you guys, this is just an HUGE disrespected of varun's work, im very ofended with this.
The guy that worked so hard for the last couple years for the development of YOUR phone, and this is how you pay him back?
I have reported SO MANY threads, where people where posting links to ""andiroxu's"" Kernel.
andiroxu on his thread, posted FALSE sources, thinking everybody is an noob.
Thread got closed of course, as those sources where indeed false
@justmpm , @GermainZ You guys have been doing an great job, cleaning all the threads
THANKS !
superdragonpt said:
I will only say this.
Give proper credits, and you will have my respect
yeah im talking to you @andiroxu
There is no way you could compile that kernel, without varun.chitre15 commits, and patches.
Im not saying you didnt added some work on that Kernel, but saying It's all your work, it's just lying
As for the rest of you guys, this is just an HUGE disrespected of varun's work, im very ofended with this.
The guy that worked so hard for the last couple years for the development of YOUR phone, and this is how you pay him back?
I have reported SO MANY threads, where people where posting links to ""andiroxu's"" Kernel.
andiroxu on his thread, posted FALSE sources, thinking everybody is an noob.
Thread got closed of course, as those sources where indeed false
@justmpm , @GermainZ You guys have been doing an great job, cleaning all the threads
THANKS !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Brother for your kind information I released my kernel before varun and it was compiled successfully and used by people. @tri_zet has aware everybody about the dirty xonfigs to be removed before compilation. He is the one who released first and inspired everyone and help me too. If you still have any doubt that without varun it was impossible than you can visit OP and check the dates of the posts. Regarding patches by varun then my source code is still available on github and anybody is welcome to investigate it. Anyone can compile to check whether it will or not. You could be a big fan or Fowler of varun but that doesn't mean that you have not to listen others.
Thank you
superdragonpt said:
I will only say this.
Give proper credits, and you will have my respect
yeah im talking to you @andiroxu
There is no way you could compile that kernel, without varun.chitre15 commits, and patches.
Im not saying you didnt added some work on that Kernel, but saying It's all your work, it's just lying
As for the rest of you guys, this is just an HUGE disrespected of varun's work, im very ofended with this.
The guy that worked so hard for the last couple years for the development of YOUR phone, and this is how you pay him back?
I have reported SO MANY threads, where people where posting links to ""andiroxu's"" Kernel.
andiroxu on his thread, posted FALSE sources, thinking everybody is an noob.
Thread got closed of course, as those sources where indeed false
@justmpm , @GermainZ You guys have been doing an great job, cleaning all the threads
THANKS !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All I am saying is, don't make such big allegations without any proof!!
Everybody in this forum respects Varun Chitre.
This thread is not intended to disrespect Varun or anybody else, this thread is here to get an UPDATE on the Investigations status on Andiroxu's kernel! It has been over a month since he has posted his source code on github and still NO ONE has checked or concluded that the source code is copied or anything., If you or anybody else here is saying we should not even ask about the status, then YOU are going against the OPEN SOURCE policy!
For your kind information, Andiroxu is the one whose kernel make Android 4.2 POSSIBLE for our device.! So ofcourse we will respect and support him!
superdragonpt said:
I will only say this.
Give proper credits, and you will have my respect
yeah im talking to you @andiroxu
There is no way you could compile that kernel, without varun.chitre15 commits, and patches.
Im not saying you didnt added some work on that Kernel, but saying It's all your work, it's just lying
As for the rest of you guys, this is just an HUGE disrespected of varun's work, im very ofended with this.
The guy that worked so hard for the last couple years for the development of YOUR phone, and this is how you pay him back?
I have reported SO MANY threads, where people where posting links to ""andiroxu's"" Kernel.
andiroxu on his thread, posted FALSE sources, thinking everybody is an noob.
Thread got closed of course, as those sources where indeed false
@justmpm , @GermainZ You guys have been doing an great job, cleaning all the threads
THANKS !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro first don't it wrong....
but this matter (about copying) is between varun bro and andiroxu bro....
why not you leave this to them.. because I saw your all your comment you only support varun bro..
andiroxu bro uploaded his new source and doesn't get any reply back from mod...
that why this thread is created and you start about copying...
so it will be great if we left this to both of them...
superdragonpt said:
I will only say this.
Give proper credits, and you will have my respect
yeah im talking to you @andiroxu
There is no way you could compile that kernel, without varun.chitre15 commits, and patches.
Im not saying you didnt added some work on that Kernel, but saying It's all your work, it's just lying
As for the rest of you guys, this is just an HUGE disrespected of varun's work, im very i with this.
The guy that worked so hard for the last couple years for the development of YOUR phone, and this is how you pay him back?
I have reported SO MANY threads, where people where posting links to ""andiroxu's"" Kernel.
andiroxu on his thread, posted FALSE sources, thinking everybody is an noob.
Thread got closed of course, as those sources where indeed false
@justmpm , @GermainZ You guys have been doing an great job, cleaning all the threads
THANKS !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro, let's take it as a neutral person.
I have used kernel by varun and andiroxu both.
But when I see a single post of yours anywhere on the A110 thread its completely against andiroxu, completely against. Is this fair?
If someone call you cheater how does this feel? Baseless allegations?
How cheap is this to call someone with bad words? And why to take it personal, how can you call him cheater?
It's embarrassing bro, please.
Non a single person disrespect varun here, non have even quoted his post on the kernel thread.
We are graceful to him and whenever he post something on our community, everyone feels blessed.
You always take side of varun sir and disrespect andiroxu, but why?
He is a human, working same as varun for us.
I didn't wanted to post any reply against you but I have seen your posts earlier which included same content.
Sent from my Nexus using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I think it is time for this thread to be closed. I don't think it is serving the purpose of the OP and some things have been said that are unfair to everyone.
I left this thread open, not so that people can point the finger of blame at each other, but to try and make it clear that this hasn't been forgotten or is being swept under the rug.
I also wanted to try and make you guys understand why ANY kernel with out GPL compliant source can not be linked, supported, talked about etc. This doesn't mean that the kernel developer is a bad guy, it is just the way that it has to be because of xda's rules on sharing and following the GPL.
Please, if you have any more issues or concerns, feel free to PM me and I will answer them as best I can.
Thanks!
justmpm
khan_frd2002 said:
Bro first don't it wrong....
but this matter (about copying) is between varun bro and andiroxu bro....
why not you leave this to them.. because I saw your all your comment you only support varun bro..
andiroxu bro uploaded his new source and doesn't get any reply back from mod...
that why this thread is created and you start about copying...
so it will be great if we left this to both of them...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about the question asked here? Why not to reply anything openly now because everything is open now?
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
It is pretty funny that mods cant even investigate a single kernel in more then a month duration.lol....
I'm sorry but I can not comment on the state of the investigation and neither can GermainZ.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you cant even give us status then you guys must NOT lock the thread. Just some blah blah blah and diverting answer of our questions to some other crap.
First I am not here opposing anyone.
I have due respect for @andiroxu for making his awesome kernels, @varunchitre.15 for all his works and @justmpm for being so supportive and friendly :thumbup:
NOW COMING TO MY VIEWS REGARDING THIS DISCUSSION.
I am still thinking that was andiroxu sources really improper? Well I really cannot comment on this......
BUT if yes than why there is no update in his thread by @GermainZ that investigation is over and thread and thread closed due to improper sources and non-GPL complaint kernel.
(THOUGH I DONT THINK THIS.)
Also I think that the thread was made just to know status of investigation and by no means target at any allegations or stating who is right @superdragonpt. Also pls respect everyone. Atleast I think that results of investigation is not out yet. So pls....
And @justmpm....just a little thing ....------>(not asking about results of investigation)BUT IN WHOLE THREAD YOU SAID THAT I CANNOT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT THE STATE OF INVESTIGATION AND NEITHER GERMAINZ CAN.
I hope atleast we could get the status.
And if status is not possible than pls any reason behind even hiding the state of investigation?
Also andiroxu said that he have uploaded the new sources. Pls atleast (if possible) a little hint about status. Also andiroxu said that even he didn't received ant reply after the new sources. Atleast if possible pls reply him.
Also I request everyone to be polite... @UnNaMeD__ just making sarcastic remark on maderators investigation is not at all grceful.
@justmpm brother....pls don't close this thread. It is just a simpe question thread(though related to some deep matters.) And is fully supporting OP too.
******b/w andiroxu brother.....really no one (except one or two) calls you cheater. Instead we all have a due reapect for you. Also everyone always praises and appreciates your works.*******
Also I am against everyone who disrespect anyone....you are at xda and not at fb. So pls give respect to everyone and everyone or else you are going straightway against xda rules.
Gentlemen...
There is a reason why the whole situation takes so much time. The kernel development is covered under GNU GPL v2 license. It means that all necessary information should be available to every person interesting in compiling a kernel.
For example the informations about toolchain, defconfig etc. etc. The last thing is that the source is pushed as a one big commit, which makes things incredibly hard to investigate. It's like finding a needle in haystack. If you want an update, so be it. Our requirements were presented to andiroxu and we gave him plenty of time to fix his repositories. The perfect solution would be merging kernel sources from kernel.org with those available for you, but I understand that it's not an easy process but doable nonetheless.
I'm not going to attack anyone, but derailing this thread to talk issues between two developers is wrong and won't be tolerated. We are not My Little Pony and don't have to love each other, but respect to other's work was a ground on which XDA was built. I understand that varun can be upset and despite the fact that releasing a kernel = accepting the GPL license = allowing everybody to use every piece of code, credits should be given. It's not hard to type 2 lines of text and thank someone. Not to mention that it's one of XDA rules.
About non compliant kernel being warez. Technically you don't have to pay for kernel, but violating the GPL license means that kernel is illegal and can't be shared. Like warez, hence the comparison.
We need the evidence and unless we get it, the thread will remain closed.
First off, I just want to say I don't mean to step on anyone's toes. Thanks for all the work so far from digitalhigh, bracketslash, santod040 and everyone who has posted information about or commits to the CM12 build tree. This is not my code, all I have done is disable enough stuff to get it to build and boot. A LOT OF STUFF IS BROKEN. This is intended for developers only right now. I will try to update the builds as I can but please don't expect true nightly builds.
DISCLAIMER: I am in no way responsible for malfunctioning or bricked devices if you run this software. If you do not agree to these terms, DO NOT DOWNLOAD. Again, this is seriously broken right now.
What doesn't work:
-Almost everything
What works:
-Wifi
-Touchscreen
-Sound
Changelog:
Merged (compare to build date)
Open (not in build yet)
Installation notes:
As I have yet to find a way to easily disable NFC for the builds, you will have to remove the /system/app/Nfc to stop those force closes. I just went to TWRP, mounted system, then ran "rm -rf /system/app/Nfc" to disable NFC for now.
Downloads:
2014-11-17: Download (Android File Host)
Edit: Please see bracketslash's thread for future downloads: http://forum.xda-developers.com/ver...ment/cm12-unofficial-unstable-builds-t2941198
bring it on bro
This saved me some time. Guess I'll see what I can do.
There was a new commit added to the open section that "adds dependency on device/qcom/sepolicy"
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/q/status:open+project:CyanogenMod/android_device_htc_m8,n,z
That was fast!
krazie1 said:
There was a new commit added to the open section that "adds dependency on device/qcom/sepolicy"
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/q/status:open+project:CyanogenMod/android_device_htc_m8,n,z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for info. I'll probably just wait on that one to get merged as so much is broken already. I doubt selinux will be the cause of frustration right now Also for anyone interested I made the following modifications to the cm12.0 branch to get this to build:
1) Created local_manifest.xml with muppeteers 12.0 branch
2) Commented out DotCase line in device/htc/m8/device.mk (has issues building)
3) Commented out ro.cwm.forbid_mount and ro.cwm.forbid_format lines in device/htc/m8/system.prop (too long)
4) Added missing overlay resources to main resources (copy the missing variables from build/overlay/frameworks/blah.xml to frameworks/blah.xml)
Ive been patiently waiting for cm12 on this beast
This should be in HTC one m8 original development not the Verizon section. If you want more attention and to help people out repose there
jake.99x3 said:
This should be in HTC one m8 original development not the Verizon section. If you want more attention and to help people out repose there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Given the intro post on the "original development" forums, I feel my topic is still more applicable in this section.
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/introducing-original-development-forums-for-more-devices/
djh816 said:
Given the intro post on the "original development" forums, I feel my topic is still more applicable in this section.
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/introducing-original-development-forums-for-more-devices/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good point so then move it to android development. Cm is for all device variants not specifically verizon and won't get Much attention here.
jake.99x3 said:
Good point so then move it to android development. Cm is for all device variants not specifically verizon and won't get Much attention here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While I agree it may not get as much attention, I still think this is the proper place. Android development (not m8 android development) is more for universal android projects or new code bases or ROMs for devices that don't have their own sub forum. That being said, this is a build of already existing code so it should go into a "development" section and given that I only plan to get this working on Verizon variant (as that's what I have) I avoided posting to the generic m8 sub forum. Mods can move as they feel fit but I think it belongs here Feel free to repost any info I have here though.
I'm trying to build and I'm getting stuck on the proprietary binaries.
Specifically this:
Code:
make: *** No rule to make target `vendor/htc/m8/proprietary/bin/adsprpcd', needed by `/home/build/cm12/out/target/product/m8/system/bin/adsprpcd'. Stop.
Any advice?
-xdadevelopers-user
xdadevelopers-user said:
I'm trying to build and I'm getting stuck on the proprietary binaries.
Specifically this:
Code:
make: *** No rule to make target `vendor/htc/m8/proprietary/bin/adsprpcd', needed by `/home/build/cm12/out/target/product/m8/system/bin/adsprpcd'. Stop.
Any advice?
-xdadevelopers-user
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm I didn't run into this. I just used the get-prebuilts command and didn't have any issue after. I followed these but modified for 12.0 branch:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/ver.../how-to-build-cm11-htc-one-m8-082714-t2860056
Just make sure your local_manifest.xml file has the 12.0 muppeteers branch as shown in example on page 6 of that thread.
djh816 said:
Hmm I didn't run into this. I just used the get-prebuilts command and didn't have any issue after. I followed these but modified for 12.0 branch:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/ver.../how-to-build-cm11-htc-one-m8-082714-t2860056
Just make sure your local_manifest.xml file has the 12.0 muppeteers branch as shown in example on page 6 of that thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@djh816
Hi compile ROM cm11 for a different device
Could you tell me which Java version are you using to build cm12, since you have just built cm12?
I tried to built cm12 yesterday and I got an error for Java so I installed OpenJDK7 and the it started building but I am getting a lot of non-device related error saying "internal compilation error"
I even tried removing all java version and re-installing OpenJDK7. Set alterantives too but no luck.
So please could you let me know which Java Version are you using for building cm12?
OpenJDK7 or Oracle/sun 7
Thanks
macs18max said:
@djh816
Hi compile ROM cm11 for a different device
Could you tell me which Java version are you using to build cm12, since you have just built cm12?
I tried to built cm12 yesterday and I got an error for Java so I installed OpenJDK7 and the it started building but I am getting a lot of non-device related error saying "internal compilation error"
I even tried removing all java version and re-installing OpenJDK7. Set alterantives too but no luck.
So please could you let me know which Java Version are you using for building cm12?
OpenJDK7 or Oracle/sun 7
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I started with clean ubuntu 14.04 lts x64 and added the packages from bracketslash's thread here. Then I just installed openjdk-7-jdk and openjdk-7-jre after that.
djh816 said:
While I agree it may not get as much attention, I still think this is the proper place. Android development (not m8 android development) is more for universal android projects or new code bases or ROMs for devices that don't have their own sub forum. That being said, this is a build of already existing code so it should go into a "development" section and given that I only plan to get this working on Verizon variant (as that's what I have) I avoided posting to the generic m8 sub forum. Mods can move as they feel fit but I think it belongs here Feel free to repost any info I have here though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HTC One M7 has fully working CM12 build, and that is in ANDROID DEVELOPMENT SECTION The Op said that he has working CM12 rom for M8, you might ask him for advice, how to make your build more stable and with less bugs. That's my opinion anyways. You can check the build for M7 here http://forum.xda-developers.com/htc-one/development/5-0-lollipop-unofficial-cm12-android-5-0-t2943826 :good:
djh816 said:
Thanks for info. I'll probably just wait on that one to get merged as so much is broken already. I doubt selinux will be the cause of frustration right now Also for anyone interested I made the following modifications to the cm12.0 branch to get this to build:
1) Created local_manifest.xml with muppeteers 12.0 branch
2) Commented out DotCase line in device/htc/m8/device.mk (has issues building)
3) Commented out ro.cwm.forbid_mount and ro.cwm.forbid_format lines in device/htc/m8/system.prop (too long)
4) Added missing overlay resources to main resources (copy the missing variables from build/overlay/frameworks/blah.xml to frameworks/blah.xml)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't need to do all of that.
There's one commit and everything works just fine.... nothing's broken.
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/76760
...and you may just want to thank invisiblek in your original post. He's the only one that did all of the work to bring up the device.
Gunman84 said:
HTC One M7 has fully working CM12 build, and that is in ANDROID DEVELOPMENT SECTION The Op said that he has working CM12 rom for M8, you might ask him for advice, how to make your build more stable and with less bugs. That's my opinion anyways. You can check the build for M7 here http://forum.xda-developers.com/htc-one/development/5-0-lollipop-unofficial-cm12-android-5-0-t2943826 :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
calling @santod040 for some cm love for m8vzw
munchy_cool said:
calling @santod040 for some cm love for m8vzw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if someone wants to make a donation to me, i will cherry pick a commit and brunch a completely working build (apart from universal cm issues).
ajrty33 said:
if someone wants to make a donation to me, i will cherry pick a commit and brunch a completely working build (apart from universal cm issues).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Welcome to XDA ..
Lollipop Red M8
We all know the Linux kernel is licensed under a specific license (GNU GPL). Arter is currently selling his kernel builds for a minimum of $2 per month to his patrons only. This is ridiculous. So we decided to mirror the build for those who can't compile it or bother paying for a kernel based on the Linux kernel itself.
MOD EDIT: DOWNLOAD LINK REMOVED
You can join our official telegram group for the latest stuff, discussion and assistance.
MOD EDIT: LINK REMOVED
Note: This isn't supposed to work on pie ROMs or Q ROMs using Pie blobs.
Enjoy
The fak is wrong with him lol
EugenStanis said:
The fak is wrong with him lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ask Arter
hbuilder said:
We all know the Linux kernel is licensed under a specific license (GNU GPL). Arter is currently selling his kernel builds for a minimum of $2 per month to his patrons only. This is ridiculous. So we decided to mirror the build for those who can't compile it or bother paying for a kernel based on the Linux kernel itself.
MOD EDIT: DOWNLOAD LINK REMOVED
Note: This isn't supposed to work on pie ROMs or Q ROMs using Pie blobs.
Enjoy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Link to original post patreon please
exodius48 said:
Link to original post patreon please
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MOD EDIT: LINK REMOVED
hbuilder said:
MOD EDIT: LINK REMOVED
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not going to use a kernel from a great developer who tweets this:
3. The Poco community *really* sucks.
I've never had this amount of people constantly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no such thing as good community. There are always poking members and members who appreciates the work the developers do. If you simply believe that the community sucks, you should simply move on and stop developing for them.
I hate to see a talented guy got on nerve just cause of few members eta posts. This should not be posted here neither we should make fun of the work he did.
With respect to the dev and his work, I'm really sad to see where the community lost a good developer for those who simply can't afford the paid versions and the dev who even thought of doing that. :crying:
Ps: there are many more awesome kernels by awesome developers. That's the beauty of open source and choice. Please close this and move on to a different kernel.
Thread closed, posting others work without permission
strongst
Forum Moderator