All links removed by VECTUS
Will there be a new version? Could you modify the latest stable build from androidarmv6 ?
rillrill said:
Will there be a new version? Could you modify the latest stable build from androidarmv6 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ofc but need to know if this work correct more info in my blog or google+
Your product is simply a modified version of androidarmv6. No permission was taken too from androidarmv6. This product doesn't resemble any originality and should be moved
Dear OP, this thread has been closed... You may contact me when you have your source code available for posting in accordance with the GPL. Link was also removed...
Related
Hello,
It has been brought to our attention that many kernels and/or ROM's (where applicable) posted in this section are not fully compliant with the GNU General Public Licence v2 (GPL v2) and for CyanogenMod ROM's the Apache licence.
This is quite frankly not acceptable so we are initiating a crackdown on this.
For kernel developers: You must provide FULL source code, not just the edits you made (reference here). Your source code must also be up-to-date with any binary releases. If in doubt, update your github first, then release the binary, NOT the other way round.
For CyanogenMod ROM developers: CyanogenMod is OpenSourced under the Apache Licence 2.0 and as such you don't need to upload your source code, though under the "spirit of OpenSource" it would be morally right to do so, however, we will not force you to do this, that is your choice to make.
For ALL ROM developers: If your ROM contains a boot.img file or a zimage file then you must state firstly whether it is your kernel or another user's kernel and secondly you must provide a link to the source code if it is your kernel and a link to the other user's kernel thread if you use another user's kernel.
The full GNU GPL v2 can be read here >>> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html
The FAQ for the GPL v2 can be read here >>> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html
Why you cannot provide just the edits you made? Read here >>> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#DistributingSourceIsInconvenient
The Apache Licence 2.0 can be read here >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html
XDA-Developers and the GPL article here >>> http://www.xda-developers.com/android/xda-developers-and-the-gpl/
I have posted notices in many users ROM/kernel threads and those people have 3 days (from the time this post was posted) to provide full kernel source. If you need more time then please contact me via PM. If you are unable to provide source code after the decided time then your thread will be closed and download links removed.
Regards,
Jonny
Ok, the 3 days were up yesterday but due to time constraints I won't start chasing people up on this until much later tonight or tomorrow. If users who were notified by me 4 days ago do not have source code up by tomorrow and have not contacted me, they have no excuse and their threads will be closed so I would suggest uploading it if not already done so.
As you might know that my last thread of this topic was closed because of no sources, but anyways I have created a blog in which everything is given:->
Moderator Edit - link deleted
Please check it out.
Captain Price said:
As you might know that my last thread of this topic was closed because of no sources, but anyways I have created a blog in which everything is given:->
Please check it out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everything has not been given. You provide no link to YOUR source code modifications of the TWRP source code. No one has access to your modifications and so we cannot verify for ourselves exactly what changes have been made.
Going to give this a miss.
Thread closed as OP has failed to provide source.
We all know the Linux kernel is licensed under a specific license (GNU GPL). Arter is currently selling his kernel builds for a minimum of $2 per month to his patrons only. This is ridiculous. So we decided to mirror the build for those who can't compile it or bother paying for a kernel based on the Linux kernel itself.
MOD EDIT: DOWNLOAD LINK REMOVED
You can join our official telegram group for the latest stuff, discussion and assistance.
MOD EDIT: LINK REMOVED
Note: This isn't supposed to work on pie ROMs or Q ROMs using Pie blobs.
Enjoy
The fak is wrong with him lol
EugenStanis said:
The fak is wrong with him lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ask Arter
hbuilder said:
We all know the Linux kernel is licensed under a specific license (GNU GPL). Arter is currently selling his kernel builds for a minimum of $2 per month to his patrons only. This is ridiculous. So we decided to mirror the build for those who can't compile it or bother paying for a kernel based on the Linux kernel itself.
MOD EDIT: DOWNLOAD LINK REMOVED
Note: This isn't supposed to work on pie ROMs or Q ROMs using Pie blobs.
Enjoy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Link to original post patreon please
exodius48 said:
Link to original post patreon please
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MOD EDIT: LINK REMOVED
hbuilder said:
MOD EDIT: LINK REMOVED
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not going to use a kernel from a great developer who tweets this:
3. The Poco community *really* sucks.
I've never had this amount of people constantly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no such thing as good community. There are always poking members and members who appreciates the work the developers do. If you simply believe that the community sucks, you should simply move on and stop developing for them.
I hate to see a talented guy got on nerve just cause of few members eta posts. This should not be posted here neither we should make fun of the work he did.
With respect to the dev and his work, I'm really sad to see where the community lost a good developer for those who simply can't afford the paid versions and the dev who even thought of doing that. :crying:
Ps: there are many more awesome kernels by awesome developers. That's the beauty of open source and choice. Please close this and move on to a different kernel.
Thread closed, posting others work without permission
strongst
Forum Moderator
So to preface, every Development thread on XDA has the following sticky:
1. If you are using a stock kernel you MUST mention where you obtained your source. Also, having a link leading to where the manufacturer has uploaded their source is always helpful.
2. If you are using a community driven source build (e.g. CyanogenMod, AOSP, or Parandroid) or a singular developer's source you MUST link directly to the repository that contains the kernel for that specific device. If you are only linking to another thread or to a general repository, this will not be considered as being GPL compliant unless the code has not been modified.
3. If you are forking a repository that is similar to the examples listed above in #2, you MUST publish and link your entire kernel source. This includes any and all changes that you have made. Two of the most common ways developers publish their source on XDA is either with Gerrit, or GitHub. While these two methods are recommended, they are not the only routes you can choose to accomplish this. All that is required is that the source can be viewed and downloaded by anyone who wishes to do so. When releasing an update, your repository must be updated the moment you release your kernel on XDA. If you can post your update to XDA, there should be no reason as to why you cannot release your source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yet, what are we to do with the tons of ROM development threads that has no reference to sources or general threads that are not possible to build? For me that's mainly a security concern, when a dev releases a ROM for general use, it's hard to check for the authenticity of the product.
Hello Folks,
I am searching Testers for DIOS 12.1 My new upcoming Xperia exclusive OS.
Things that don't work actually on Sagami Boards due to the Xperia Software Binaries:
-Mobile Data
-Wifi
-NFC
-Battery Status (No Infos)
Make sure You know what You do. Flash the OEM Software binaries to use this AOSP/SODP based ROM. Flash all Images included in My ZIPs. OTAs can be applied over ADB and Recovery after You have flashed My Kernels/Recoveries. Feel free to ask Me out if You have Questions and consider Joining Me on Social Media or Discord to stay up-to-date.
Sign in - Google Accounts
Device Trees & Kernel: https://github.com/sonyxperiadev/local_manifests
Hi OP, since you are the original developer for this ROM, I changed the tag from General to Development.
Also, because you are posting this ROM yourself, could you please also post a link to kernel source repo? As on XDA we need to comply with GPL v2 which requires kernel source to be open source.
Thank you very much.
jerryhou85 said:
Hi OP, since you are the original developer for this ROM, I changed the tag from General to Development.
Also, because you are posting this ROM yourself, could you please also post a link to kernel source repo? As on XDA we need to comply with GPL v2 which requires kernel source to be open source.
Thank you very much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the Help! Since i am using the SODP Device Trees are we going with Pre-Compiled Kernels from the SODP for now.
Source will be added to the first Post! https://github.com/sonyxperiadev/local_manifests