Database Info

Overclocking Thunderbolt

I have read that the HTC Inspire has the same CPU as the Thunderbolt, if this is correct will the 1.8ghz overclock also work for the Thunderbolt? Anyone with some light on this situation?

dredoubleu said:
I have read that the HTC Inspire has the same CPU as the Thunderbolt, if this is correct will the 1.8ghz overclock also work for the Thunderbolt? Anyone with some light on this situation?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We'll have to wait until we get custom kernels to do this. Each phone has a different kernel IIRC so you can't slap the Inspire OC on the Thunderbolt and rock on.
I'm sure we'll hit 1.8 if not 2.0. Just be patient.
I'm happy with 1G as is... but I could always use more speed.

According to Wikipedia:
Inspire uses the MSM8255 chip..
Thunderbolt uses the MSM8655.
They are both rated for 1ghz, but it could be that the MSM8655 is superior in other ways and might have a higher/safer overhead.. We might be able to get a 100% overclock or really dark close to it.

Diversion said:
According to Wikipedia:
Inspire uses the MSM8255 chip..
Thunderbolt uses the MSM8655.
They are both rated for 1ghz, but it could be that the MSM8655 is superior in other ways and might have a higher/safer overhead.. We might be able to get a 100% overclock or really dark close to it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The difference in the chips is the radio bands. 82XX is GSM and 86XX is CDMA.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk

Would LOVE to get 1.8GHz!

Jimmy058910 said:
Would LOVE to get 1.8GHz!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
with a battery life of 45 mins.!

the guy who did that 1.8Ghz kernel claims he gets 20 hours or so on a charge.

I think it would easily get 20 hours on a full charge. Interactive only uses what it needs.
I'm gonna miss ChevyNo1s kernels on the OG Droid, they were amazing
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App

Diversion said:
According to Wikipedia:
Inspire uses the MSM8255 chip..
Thunderbolt uses the MSM8655.
They are both rated for 1ghz, but it could be that the MSM8655 is superior in other ways and might have a higher/safer overhead.. We might be able to get a 100% overclock or really dark close to it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the 8255 is the same cpu in the MT4G which can clock up to 1.8

They just did overclock it to 1.8ghz
The story here
2800 on the quadrant, another article shows a screenshot of 3000 too.
Also, tester says he was getting 12 hours (8AM to 8PM) with moderate use. 45 minutes, I think not...
Enjoy!

Sirjacksinurbox said:
They just did overclock it to 1.8ghz
The story here
2800 on the quadrant, another article shows a screenshot of 3000 too.
Also, tester says he was getting 12 hours (8AM to 8PM) with moderate use. 45 minutes, I think not...
Enjoy!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol I was being sarcastic. I am well aware of the fact that you can get good battery life out of an overclocked phone. I came from the evo 4G where I had "god" mode enabled and got great battery life.
P.S. God mode on the evo ment overclocking to 1.2Ghz. Most phones couldn't go that high, so you had to enable "god" mode to try.

Sirjacksinurbox said:
They just did overclock it to 1.8ghz
The story here
2800 on the quadrant, another article shows a screenshot of 3000 too.
Also, tester says he was getting 12 hours (8AM to 8PM) with moderate use. 45 minutes, I think not...
Enjoy!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Money. I'll take it.
Now gimme a link!!!!
Good to know the phone doesn't disappoint.

I'm an inspire owner on an overclocked kernel. On 1800 my battery with normal use (tons of Facebook and xda app, email,~50 texts, and 10-15 2-5 min phone calls) gets ~20-24 hrs on a full charge. This was my best benchmark.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Just loaded Drod's 1.5 GHZ overclock. 2483 on quadrant and a noticeably snappier interface.

Sirjacksinurbox said:
Just loaded Drod's 1.5 GHZ overclock. 2483 on quadrant and a noticeably snappier interface.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried that as well. My Quadrant score was similar but I found browser scrolling and gameplay in Angry Birds to be noticeably choppy. Also, in Quadrant, the orbiting planet test pegs at 60fps stock where with this kernel it was jumping around all over at lower fps. Ended up flashing a different stock clocked kernel and everything was good again.

06ms6 said:
I tried that as well. My Quadrant score was similar but I found browser scrolling and gameplay in Angry Birds to be noticeably choppy. Also, in Quadrant, the orbiting planet test pegs at 60fps stock where with this kernel it was jumping around all over at lower fps. Ended up flashing a different stock clocked kernel and everything was good again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Adrynalyne said somewhere that his 1.6GHz was thermal throttling ... this might also be what is happening in the situation you're describing.

we need to find the link to the kernel that has the TB OC'd to 1.8... >.>

I don't think the 1.8 is quite ready yet, but it seems a little excessive to me.. but thats just my humble opinion

javajoe1981 said:
I don't think the 1.8 is quite ready yet, but it seems a little excessive to me.. but thats just my humble opinion
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How dare u be humble!
Sent from my ADR6400L using XDA App

I have a kernel that is 1.8ghz capable, but it will reset after a while. So far it seems that 1.4ghz is stable. If I go any higher, eventually it resets. I have the Liquid sense rom installed. Haven't tried any others to see if the kernels are more stable at higher clocks.
Edit: with this ROM at 1.8hgz I get a 2571 on quadrant. I think that's particularly good. Too bad it resets once in a while. Any one recommend a good kernel for stable overclock?

T-Mobile G2x by LG Benchmark Score

I have ran the Quadrand Standard Benchmark on my phone several times now. The highest score I have ever seen on a phone is 2592.
My old Samsung Vibrant couldn't even do half of that. I don't rely TOO MUCH on the benchmarks but they do give you a GENERAL I dea of what your phone is capable of.
My phone is rooted but the processing power was not boosted in any way, using any program. Just the raw, everyday processing power.
FEEL FREE TO POST YOUR BEST SCORES UP!
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App

This is my highest score as of yet.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

My score is 2500 average. I want to remove some T-Mobile crap soon. Score may go higher.
@DrowsyMalice: i see you use a task killer. You should read this article : http://androidspin.com/2010/05/25/why-you-dont-need-a-task-killer-app-with-android/

I question the validity and reliability of a test such as quadrant.
why is it that scores can be so inconsistent on a single device, even if you run tests back to back to back?
I must have missed the memo somewhere explaining this, as well as how the scores are standardized between devices.

OrganizedFellow said:
My score is 2500 average. I want to remove some T-Mobile crap soon. Score may go higher.
@DrowsyMalice: i see you use a task killer. You should read this article : http://androidspin.com/2010/05/25/why-you-dont-need-a-task-killer-app-with-android/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your concern but I'm fully aware of what to kill and what not to kill lol
I have applications that I don't want randomly ran frozen, and applications that I'm done with, killed.
Thanks.

Cyanogen Demonstrates Quadrant’s Flaws - BriefMobile - http://goo.gl/hpuZM

Post G2X Patch http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1051616
Quad standard: ~2400
Quad advansed: ~2650

Vibrant
Ive benched higher on my customized Vibrant. It was overclocked @1.2 Ghz. I actually like my vibrant alot more with the screen and size and roms. So far I think my G2X is just kind of iffy. Cant wait til some roms come out and some stuff optimized for the tegra2. It took the vibrant almost a year to get where it is today and Alot of thanks go out to the developers, for almost tripling the original performance. The only reason I upgraded to the G2X was camera flash... Oh well.

I hit 2749 after 4 subsequent runs all in the high 2600s/low 2700s. This is after applying the pre-dexopt patch, so I recommend you guys go over and get it. Before I applied the patch I was getting high 2300s/low 2500s.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1117

mapin0518 said:
I hit 2749 after 4 subsequent runs all in the high 2600s/low 2700s. This is after applying the pre-dexopt patch, so I recommend you guys go over and get it. Before I applied the patch I was getting high 2300s/low 2500s.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1117
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have similar scores after the patch. I have had around 2900+ with MT4G overclocked at 1812 max (do not leave it at max - use a conservative 1612 - lol) with faux lv CM7 Kernel.
Quadrant scores are suspect however, as Linpack scores tell a different story. With MT4G above, get mid 50"s to low 60's. With G2X - I cannot break even 40.
I think it will do much better overclocked of course, and even better when we finally get a genuine duel core ROM on it - like 2.4 or 3.1.
But the fact remains that even with similar Quadrant scores, the linpack scores are not very high on the stock G2X.

So far I've gotten 2412. Completely stock, no root, nada!

DrowsyMalice said:
This is my highest score as of yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dont know about THE BENCH! BUT THAT GIRL at the bottom!!!!!!!!!!!!

nodrogkam said:
I question the validity and reliability of a test such as quadrant.
why is it that scores can be so inconsistent on a single device, even if you run tests back to back to back?
I must have missed the memo somewhere explaining this, as well as how the scores are standardized between devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ignore the first run, then run it 10 times, dropping any with erroneous values, and average the scores. It's benchmarking, you're never going to get the same result especially on a device that's running so many active services that fire off at random. That's also why I bought Quadrant Advance since it allows running the phone in airplane mode and also breaks down the scores for better analysis.
Using that process I'm averaging about 2450 on a stock phone.

rooted s-off
stock rom and kernel
Quadrant: 2724
smartbench 2011: productivity:2970
Games:2516
neocore:80.1FPS
nenmark:57.4FPS

Highest score so far was 2640 on quadrant.

..........

I got 2600+ ...rooted , stock rom.

this is my fist run after installing patch on my G2x.. hit 2676

[/IMG]
I got this the first day. Now I get around 2750.

OrganizedFellow said:
Cyanogen Demonstrates Quadrant’s Flaws - BriefMobile - http://goo.gl/hpuZM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like how in this article they said obscenely high score and it was something like 2700 and my G2x gets too 2500 without tampering with the partition. Gotta love dual core.

[BENCHMARK ] Finding the ULTIMATE gaming experience.

Hi. I am looking for the BEST gaming experience on our TF700, but doesn't matter how many ROMs I,ve tested I can't get satisfied.
Please post your results here:​
Plan:
1. ROM name.
2. KERNEL name.
3. CPU / GPU settings.
4. Benchmark name and results. (Please use Quadrant, but others are OK too.)
5. MODs, tricks, whatever you want to add.
6. Your Gaming experience, for example: Gangstar Vegas is playable but a bit laggy.
__________________________________________
So, I'm gonna start:
1. CROMi-Xenogenesis 4.7.0
2. JB 4.2.1 ★ Hundsbuah ★ 10.6.1.14.8 ★ v3.2.0
3. CPU: All 4 cores set to: 1850Mhz GPU: 775Mhz
4. Quadrant:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
5. No MODS, No DATA2sd, 32gb version. I was using Hundsbuah program to set CPU / GPU and may have enabled gaming mode. Gaming mode slows CPU down when it gets to hot. That may have affected the score. I was running this benchmark 3 times, and once I got something like 5009 overall? Much lower, but it was generally I/O.
6. Gangstar Vegas (Gangstar 4) playable, bit laggy, but not all the time, just time to time. 5 seconds normally, 2 seconds of Lag, and so on.
GTA Vice City:
Bit Laggy on maximum settings, quite good on lower settings.
GTA III: Simmilar to Vice City, a bit better.

Reserved

deadlocked007 said:
All in all everything is laggy thanks to no optimization and tegra 3s underwhelming power with our overwhelming display... :'(
It's the same experience no matter what you use even down to the most stripped down aosp Rom.
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree, but this is noit the point. I know we aren't getting everything from this device. I saw it on my HTC Sensation. How much OS matters. So Please post your scores. Let's find the best solution.

You've got some serious performance issues there. With Hunds OC to 1700 on 4 cores and gpu at 600 I get 6800+ on quadrant.
You've done something wrong somewhere. Have you got fsync disabled?

sbdags said:
You've got some serious performance issues there. With Hunds OC to 1700 on 4 cores and gpu at 600 I get 6800+ on quadrant.
You've done something wrong somewhere. Have you got fsync disabled?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sdbags is tottally right, i just recently went over to hunds with f sync disbled,
i havent adjusted any clock speeds myself and i tend to get a quadrant score of around 6500,
as for your over clocking and gaming, im not 100% sure if thats the best thing to do due to the heat it can cause and such,
i could be tottally wrong with my last line but i am being cautious and reading up a fair bit before i crank everything up,
havent found a definitive answer on that yet unfortunately.

alanm1986 said:
Sdbags is tottally right, i just recently went over to hunds with f sync disbled,
i havent adjusted any clock speeds myself and i tend to get a quadrant score of around 6500,
as for your over clocking and gaming, im not 100% sure if thats the best thing to do due to the heat it can cause and such,
i could be tottally wrong with my last line but i am being cautious and reading up a fair bit before i crank everything up,
havent found a definitive answer on that yet unfortunately.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right. With that high OC he will most likely achieve the opposite of what he actually wants to.

Not the OC is the problem, but the temperature control. But you do have a good point. I'll try getting lower. Thanks guys

Antutu bechmark Lg Flex 2. 5.1.1

My phone with 5.0.1
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
... And now my phone with 5.1.1 ...
What do you think? I'm very proud of this phone....
No lag no hot... Good work LG!!!!

I have the version with 16 GB and 2 GB of RAM !!!

That's a huge difference, did you clean update or just took the OTA?

To tell you the truth your first result with 5.01 was very low even with that firmware.your second result with 5.1.1 is normal.after we update our rom or get a new device we should at first reset to defaults to minimise the risk of bad flashing.

I've made a dirty flash, I've no brand firmware and I have flash Vodafone firmware in dirty mode. I'm really happy for this update...

Isolameteo_Sardegna said:
I've made a dirty flash, I've no brand firmware and I have flash Vodafone firmware in dirty mode. I'm really happy for this update...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All ok then!!! Indeed latest firmware fixes a lot of problems of our devices

WOW, that increase is huge!!
And I always thought this phone was a flop...................................

I got around 48000 on 5.1.1 with a new device with just a few apps installed

Heres mine 5.1.1 all stock ota, using nova launcher if that has any effect..
Sent from my LGLS996 using XDA Free mobile app

I put it in the refrigerator when I ran it and it went up to around 52000

5.1.1 all stock

magicmarco78 said:
5.1.1 all stock
View attachment 3367925
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good result!

Got a H955 on Friday. Updated to 5.1.1. Running completely stock at the moment.
Ran 3 test back to back:
1) 53703
2)52253
3) 47712
Throttling cost 11.2%
Thought to myself: Never really done back to back testing on my LG G2 - lets see what happens.
Test one was around 36000, Test two around 30000 and Test three around 29500. Throttling cost 18% The G2 was warm to the touch, and throttled quicker. I've been more than happy with my G2 for nearly 2 years.....
For me it seems the bigger problem was LG's implementation of Android at launch.

I put the air conditioning on the phone and was able to hit 57000!

I did a test again for the first time in a few days, and got 53829. A few days ago I did a test right after a reboot, but my score was pretty terrible then. It was about 43 000, I think.
Did a second test and got 50042.

simon21 said:
I put it in the refrigerator when I ran it and it went up to around 52000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol !

my result
Guys, if you force gpu rendering, the phones cpu gets freed up to do the more important stuff and the battery actually improved a bit too. Guessing that adreno 430 is a bit more power efficient then the a57 cores.

Force gpu rendering.. did you also force 4x MSAA?
Sent from my LG-H959 using Tapatalk

kramnod.be02d said:
Force gpu rendering.. did you also force 4x MSAA?
Sent from my LG-H959 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope, just force gpu rendering

WittePens said:
Guys, if you force gpu rendering, the phones cpu gets freed up to do the more important stuff and the battery actually improved a bit too. Guessing that adreno 430 is a bit more power efficient then the a57 cores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How's the battery life affected after enabling GPU rendering? Better, worse or about the same?
Thanks for sharing.

66K Antutu?!

So I just ran Antutu benchmark and got 66000 points!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Normally it should be around 40-48k or not?
What scores are you achieving with your Note 3 ?
I used Note 3 Hlte SM-N9005XXUGBOD3 - Temaseks CM13 v10.0 - idlekernel @2.73 - CPU Governor: performance and battery settings to more power.

Woah that was crazy! And that all is green!
You already on par with SD805! (Right?)
By the way, 55k is my record with n900
Aurora rom with SueMax kernel
My setting is min and max freq @ 2.0ghz lol (btw, not my daily settings, just for benchmark)

@pitopika13 ,Crazyyyy?what the ****,this is crazy................My record..........

kppus said:
@pitopika13 ,Crazyyyy?what the ****,this is crazy................My record..........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow I knew that you could get theoretical note 4 performance with an OC'd Note 3 but now almost as much as Note 5 ? I think I found another reason to keep this bulky phone with me :laugh:

My highest was 59k with phronesis note 5 port.
Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk

hello guys , I'll come back with a better score ..........

I do 63 000 each time with this 6.0 Touchwiz ROM : http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-note-3/development/6-0-1-touchwiz-marshmallow-note-3-t3349306

I used to get 69k with note 5 port+overclocked lean kernel. Still it's just a benchmarking. I was using power saving daily because at the end battery life is more important.
Sent from my SM-G925F

Got 58k as DarkLord ROM without optimization.

pitopika13 said:
Woah that was crazy! And that all is green!
You already on par with SD805! (Right?)
By the way, 55k is my record with n900
Aurora rom with SueMax kernel
My setting is min and max freq @ 2.0ghz lol (btw, not my daily settings, just for benchmark)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also had 54000 points with the new version of Antutu.
Lollipop 5.0 rom stock N900

Rosli59564 said:
I used to get 69k with note 5 port+overclocked lean kernel. Still it's just a benchmarking. I was using power saving daily because at the end battery life is more important.
Sent from my SM-G925F
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would realy like to see a screenshot if that score. :laugh:
Managed to squize a little bit more out of my note 3 and got 67508 points (with better GPU governor)

holzmans said:
I also had 54000 points with the new version of Antutu.
Lollipop 5.0 rom stock N900
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Woah stock! With all stability, you could get that high on n900, maybe i should go back to stock eh lol
Since my 55k score mean my phone would be unstable for daily usage.

pitopika13 said:
Woah stock! With all stability, you could get that high on n900, maybe i should go back to stock eh lol
Since my 55k score mean my phone would be unstable for daily usage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just think that Antutu gives the highest values ​​in the new version only for new phone models have very high ratings. In previous versions just get around 40k and 54k now without changing the Rom or overclock or anything.

holzmans said:
I just think that Antutu gives the highest values ​​in the new version only for new phone models have very high ratings. In previous versions just get around 40k and 54k now without changing the Rom or overclock or anything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yess, you're right, i6s used to be around 68k below the S6 and now, it is all the way to the 130k?! I know the new app version is more compatible with the new platform but that's far
Back on topic
I think it's almost impossible to best my own score @55k with my settings, always around 54-55k, i havent try any other rom though. :silly:

Can you guys give some tips on kernel settings etc before benchmark?

jordanpa said:
Can you guys give some tips on kernel settings etc before benchmark?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your phone version? (N900 or N9005)
Also dont rely on kernel only, a stable rom also gives a good antutu score.

pitopika13 said:
What's your phone version? (N900 or N9005)
Also dont rely on kernel only, a stable rom also gives a good antutu score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
N9005 -I am just curious as all the Rom's I have tested are give or take 45-55k score so when I saw these screenshots I assumed there must be kernel configurations you make prior to benchmarking..

jordanpa said:
N9005 -I am just curious as all the Rom's I have tested are give or take 45-55k score so when I saw these screenshots I assumed there must be kernel configurations you make prior to benchmarking..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I posted all settings below the screenshot in #1
Only changed GPU governor to performance later on.