Database Info

T-Mobile G2x by LG Benchmark Score

I have ran the Quadrand Standard Benchmark on my phone several times now. The highest score I have ever seen on a phone is 2592.
My old Samsung Vibrant couldn't even do half of that. I don't rely TOO MUCH on the benchmarks but they do give you a GENERAL I dea of what your phone is capable of.
My phone is rooted but the processing power was not boosted in any way, using any program. Just the raw, everyday processing power.
FEEL FREE TO POST YOUR BEST SCORES UP!
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App

This is my highest score as of yet.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

My score is 2500 average. I want to remove some T-Mobile crap soon. Score may go higher.
@DrowsyMalice: i see you use a task killer. You should read this article : http://androidspin.com/2010/05/25/why-you-dont-need-a-task-killer-app-with-android/

I question the validity and reliability of a test such as quadrant.
why is it that scores can be so inconsistent on a single device, even if you run tests back to back to back?
I must have missed the memo somewhere explaining this, as well as how the scores are standardized between devices.

OrganizedFellow said:
My score is 2500 average. I want to remove some T-Mobile crap soon. Score may go higher.
@DrowsyMalice: i see you use a task killer. You should read this article : http://androidspin.com/2010/05/25/why-you-dont-need-a-task-killer-app-with-android/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your concern but I'm fully aware of what to kill and what not to kill lol
I have applications that I don't want randomly ran frozen, and applications that I'm done with, killed.
Thanks.

Cyanogen Demonstrates Quadrant’s Flaws - BriefMobile - http://goo.gl/hpuZM

Post G2X Patch http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1051616
Quad standard: ~2400
Quad advansed: ~2650

Vibrant
Ive benched higher on my customized Vibrant. It was overclocked @1.2 Ghz. I actually like my vibrant alot more with the screen and size and roms. So far I think my G2X is just kind of iffy. Cant wait til some roms come out and some stuff optimized for the tegra2. It took the vibrant almost a year to get where it is today and Alot of thanks go out to the developers, for almost tripling the original performance. The only reason I upgraded to the G2X was camera flash... Oh well.

I hit 2749 after 4 subsequent runs all in the high 2600s/low 2700s. This is after applying the pre-dexopt patch, so I recommend you guys go over and get it. Before I applied the patch I was getting high 2300s/low 2500s.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1117

mapin0518 said:
I hit 2749 after 4 subsequent runs all in the high 2600s/low 2700s. This is after applying the pre-dexopt patch, so I recommend you guys go over and get it. Before I applied the patch I was getting high 2300s/low 2500s.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1117
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have similar scores after the patch. I have had around 2900+ with MT4G overclocked at 1812 max (do not leave it at max - use a conservative 1612 - lol) with faux lv CM7 Kernel.
Quadrant scores are suspect however, as Linpack scores tell a different story. With MT4G above, get mid 50"s to low 60's. With G2X - I cannot break even 40.
I think it will do much better overclocked of course, and even better when we finally get a genuine duel core ROM on it - like 2.4 or 3.1.
But the fact remains that even with similar Quadrant scores, the linpack scores are not very high on the stock G2X.

So far I've gotten 2412. Completely stock, no root, nada!

DrowsyMalice said:
This is my highest score as of yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dont know about THE BENCH! BUT THAT GIRL at the bottom!!!!!!!!!!!!

nodrogkam said:
I question the validity and reliability of a test such as quadrant.
why is it that scores can be so inconsistent on a single device, even if you run tests back to back to back?
I must have missed the memo somewhere explaining this, as well as how the scores are standardized between devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ignore the first run, then run it 10 times, dropping any with erroneous values, and average the scores. It's benchmarking, you're never going to get the same result especially on a device that's running so many active services that fire off at random. That's also why I bought Quadrant Advance since it allows running the phone in airplane mode and also breaks down the scores for better analysis.
Using that process I'm averaging about 2450 on a stock phone.

rooted s-off
stock rom and kernel
Quadrant: 2724
smartbench 2011: productivity:2970
Games:2516
neocore:80.1FPS
nenmark:57.4FPS

Highest score so far was 2640 on quadrant.

..........

I got 2600+ ...rooted , stock rom.

this is my fist run after installing patch on my G2x.. hit 2676

[/IMG]
I got this the first day. Now I get around 2750.

OrganizedFellow said:
Cyanogen Demonstrates Quadrant’s Flaws - BriefMobile - http://goo.gl/hpuZM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like how in this article they said obscenely high score and it was something like 2700 and my G2x gets too 2500 without tampering with the partition. Gotta love dual core.

Whats your Best Quadrant Scores? Lets Race!!

What you guys got... Run What you Brung!! Lets see Who Can Win. No Cheating!! I use Quadrant Advance as it shows all of your CPU, IO, 2D, 3D, memory. I Will set the bar HIGH. Lets Go!! 3865!! WHAT!!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Quardrant schmrandt. ....
oh well. people never will learn.

Put up or Shut Up. The Faster your ROM & Kernal Will Show in your Score. This Post Is Not For The Trolls Or Skeptics. Many of us Love to run Quadrants. I have many HIGH Scores such as this. What you Got?

vabeach454 said:
Put up or Shut Up. The Faster your ROM & Kernal Will Show in your Score. This Post Is Not For The Trolls Or Skeptics. Many of us Love to run Quadrants. I have many HIGH Scores such as this. What you Got?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
really you are going to go there?
1) Quadrant Scores really do not mean anything. all about how the end user feels about the ROM.
2) i am currently running the 2.3.3 leaked MySense ROM. And when it comes to how smooth it is.. it's lightyears beyond how i felt about Cyanogen(mod) or EViL's HD ROM. It's snappy responsive and works EXTREMELY well. However the quadrant is much lower than Cyanogen or EViL's ROM.
3) any developer or anyone with any amount of time under their belt will tell you that Quadrant Scores do not mean jack crap when it comes to the real world. Once again it's all about how the end user likes his or her ROM, and how smooth it is. The only people who rely on Quadrant scores are people who surf Android Central and Android and Me.
Have fun running your Quadrants, i'm not telling you not to.
I'm not a self proclaimed "troll" but i am a "realist". If you want Trolls to stay out of your Threads. Do not post them on the internet....

My UI is very fast and Smooth... BTW I am not running what is in my signature. I didnt start the thread to be a debate, but to see what people are actually achieving in Quadrant. I have seen you in many other threads and I respect your opinion.

vabeach454 said:
My UI is very fast and Smooth... BTW I am not running what is in my signature. I didnt start the thread to be a debate, but to see what people are actually achieving in Quadrant. I have seen you in many other threads and I respect your opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks buddy.
I'm not hear to debate either. I guess since we can all play nice together... Running the leaked MySense ROM. Stock Kernel
i'll post a screen shot in a second. of my Quadrant. just for you....

Thanks for participating. I tried using Photobucket to enlarge my pic, but to no evail. Any ideas?

I never got close to 3000, this is my best
ROM: CyanogenMod-7.0.2-glacier
Kernel: [email protected]#1 (or the kernel that was included with the ROM )
CPU Speed: 1516mhz
CPU Govenor: Performance
@vabeach454: After I uploaded to Photobucket, I copied the IMG code and pasted it, that's how I got my image to be this size.

Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App

First Post... Be Gentle
ROM: Orange Glacier
Kernal:2.6.32.21-FR-Sense-Faux123-v1.0.0RC3-CFS(153)
Quadrant 2900
Linpack 63.033
To prevent spam to the forums, ALL new users are not permitted to post outside links in their messages. After approximately eight posts, you will be able to post outside links. Thanks for understanding!
I guess I need to post more...lol

Quadrantis a pretty horrible benchmark. It's notorious for being inaccurate and giving bloated scores if you wanted a more accurate reading you should use smartbench. It's probably the best out of all of them ceptit does bias a little toward Samsung phones.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using Tapatalk

I have no clue what to gauge the phone against everyone uses quadrant that I know and hardly anyone posts smartbench scores... but for what its worth.
I scored:
Productivity 1892
Games 1846
Is this good or bad...lol I have no clue.

BUGBYTE_V said:
First Post... Be Gentle
ROM: Orange Glacier
Kernal:2.6.32.21-FR-Sense-Faux123-v1.0.0RC3-CFS(153)
Quadrant 2900
Linpack 63.033
To prevent spam to the forums, ALL new users are not permitted to post outside links in their messages. After approximately eight posts, you will be able to post outside links. Thanks for understanding!
I guess I need to post more...lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice linpack!! Did you post that?
Here is another one... Look at my I/O!!! Thats Fast. Is there anyone that is even close? I am trying to break 4000!!
[/IMG]

I wanna know what you run to get a score like that.

My quadrant score is : 2235
on CM 7.0.2 with faux CFS low voltage kernel @ 1.2 ghz
What rom/settings are you using to get such high scores?
That's totally awesome

silentsnow31802 said:
I wanna know what you run to get a score like that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running a version of Ice Glacier/My Sence (EXT 2) with faux123's 0.9.9 BFS LV #137 Kernal With a LagFix. The ROM is NOT Ready for Release as I still have some work to do on it and probably will need some DEV help to do it. Any DEV's willing to help with it please PM me.
P.S. Not all Glaciers will run at these speeds, they will lock up. This is my forth HTC Glacier and it is built in China. My others were Taiwon Built and NONE of them could handle this. Fortunatly this Glacier has never locked up on me and can handle anything I can throw at it.

I have reached scores around 3600ish on Iced Glacier 1.1.6, 3200ish on CM7 and Evil's MIUI. Havent tried any of the Sense roms yet. Running stock MySense now and the scores come out pretty low, but its running really fast without any lag at all. OC at 1.8ghz smartass. Confuses me But here are some pics I just took

clarknick27 said:
I have reached scores around 3600ish on Iced Glacier 1.1.6, 3200ish on CM7 and Evil's MIUI. Havent tried any of the Sense roms yet. Running stock MySense now and the scores come out pretty low, but its running really fast without any lag at all. OC at 1.8ghz smartass. Confuses me
I get 1850 from a stock (out of the box) MT4G, so my guess is that the kernal didnt install. Your scores with faux123's kernal should be much higher.
I have not seen any Quadrant Scores that top mine yet. Not being cocky... Just waiting.
[/IMG]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

I cant for the life of me get over 2200ish. Even with 1.8 BFS kernel. Not sure what im doing wrong here...

What ROM are you running? You should be getting much higher scores.

Question about quadrant scores!!!!

Hello everyone I just have a quick question... What is the trick to get quadrant scores up above 5000? I've seen many people with high scores and I've tried everything and never got out of the 4000`s, actually every time I've ran quadrant, HTC one x beats out my device.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app

ray7171 said:
Hello everyone I just have a quick question... What is the trick to get quadrant scores up above 5000? I've seen many people with high scores and I've tried everything and never got out of the 4000`s, actually every time I've ran quadrant, HTC one x beats out my device.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends, is your phone rooted? Or is it just running stock TW?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app

ray7171 said:
Hello everyone I just have a quick question... What is the trick to get quadrant scores up above 5000? I've seen many people with high scores and I've tried everything and never got out of the 4000`s, actually every time I've ran quadrant, HTC one x beats out my device.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
who cares Its just a number. But if it means that much to you run it several times in a row, it will eventually mess up and give you a hugh fake number You can show all your friends
I got over 30,000 once on my dx and it was still choppy!

piiman said:
who cares Its just a number. But if it means that much to you run it several times in a row, it will eventually mess up and give you a hugh fake number You can show all your friends
I got over 30,000 once on my dx and it was still choppy!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, its a number, and trying to "increase" it to make the phone "faster" is dumb. If stock has a 1.5ghz clock and scored lets say 4800, Cm10 might be +/- 200 but on the same clock it cant score much higher..... without dumb modifications to fake it.

It is not dumb at all.. You are trying to optimize the performance of your phone.. Make sure battery power saving is turned off, close all applications, usually running after a fresh reboot help. Overclocking helps.
I scored this https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/s720x720/527107_10151086780898557_1408887957_n.jpg

I was saying the number of 4800 as an example. And yes power saving lowers cpu clock I believe so that affects the score. I'm running a test on cm10 no overclock or anything to show what a true score is. of course overclocking makes it faster, thats not dumb but modifications geared to increase the actual score is silly.
Just got 4400.

These tools are used to give an estimate of how your device compares to other devices... That being said I am running Cleanrom/Cleankernel and get just about the same numbers all the time except for Linpack... I have my phone overclocked to 1800-1999 ghz and my scores are below but it depends on your hardware too... You might not be able to push some phones that high but mine is totally stable at these overclocks so I def have a keeper but my damn home button sticks so I am in the process of getting a replacement... Much love to Cleanrom though!! :good:
I also have no secrets as to make my score higher and even if I did that would be stupid!! IMO

Pretty much all developers will tell you quadrant and benchmarks do not (always) translate to real world performance.
That said: ROMs and kernels will affect scores.
CPU governors will affect scores
Overclocking your CPU will boost our score.
The current jellybean leaks is very fast - will give you scores of 5500+ if that's what our looking for.
Sent from a SYNERGIZED GalaxySIII

Why are people over clocking this phone? Is their anything on Android that really needs more power then a dual core S4 at 1.5ghz?

[email protected] said:
Why are people over clocking this phone? Is their anything on Android that really needs more power then a dual core S4 at 1.5ghz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, not at all............ someone here please tell me why the phone isnt fast enough enough at 1.5?

tonu42 said:
Yep, its a number, and trying to "increase" it to make the phone "faster" is dumb. If stock has a 1.5ghz clock and scored lets say 4800, Cm10 might be +/- 200 but on the same clock it cant score much higher..... without dumb modifications to fake it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The point is Quadrant sucks and is unreliable, I wasn't kidding when I said I got a 30,000 once....Run it a few times in a row it gets a little better as you repeat. Different biuldprop settings can also make a big difference so different ROMS could easily have vastly different scores.. You couldn't see that +/-200 in real life anyways...... admit it you just want bragging rights :highfive: cooomme onnn admit it

tonu42 said:
Nope, not at all............ someone here please tell me why the phone isnt fast enough enough at 1.5?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I run mine at 1.2 and honestly I can't tell a difference between 1.2, 1.5, and 2.1 beyond benches telling me it's faster.
Please excuse my Galaxy S III, it's a bit Paranoid.

Just for fun....I loaded unofficial cm 9/13 by invisiblek, antutu was 7383. I then loaded ktoonz kernel, it goes up to 8123 (did not overclock). There was someone oc'ed it and got >9000.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

tonu42 said:
Nope, not at all............ someone here please tell me why the phone isnt fast enough enough at 1.5?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you dont belong here i think... you've missed the point entirely.
BECAUSE YOU CAN

Clienterror said:
I run mine at 1.2 and honestly I can't tell a difference between 1.2, 1.5, and 2.1 beyond benches telling me it's faster.
Please excuse my Galaxy S III, it's a bit Paranoid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just run the phone at 1.0ghz to save on battery and apart from the occasional lag that comes with it, it's not that bad. Had my battery go over 2 days without a single charge due to the underclocking.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app

Absolutely stock here. Don't get hung up over benchmark scores... they're only useful for comparing YOUR device before and after you make changes.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
If you REALLY want the best score (and I recommend this when you use a benchmark the right way... like I said, to measure the result of changes), restart your phone, let everything load, then run it. A bunch of background operations can and will slow things down.
But again... they're meaningless for the most part. I could run it again now and the numbers could be wildly different.

Quadrant scores mean nothing.

Maybe u guys just don't know how to test very well or thoroughly, or don't know what to look for. Benchmarks do help. If u know how to use them. No, they don't always show real world use. They should be used to determine the phones maximum. I use them for judging how well they will play through the hardest emulator game, or most intense Android game. It isn't the only thing I go by, but when figuring out new settings or trying to push a new kernel to its absolute max, it is useful as well.
Swyped from my eVo

LG G Flex 2 Runs Better with Battery Saver On....

I was curious about this phone's overheating/lag problems, so I thought I'd try turning on Battery Saver. It seems to be much smoother now. Still not quite perfect, but it's a step forward; at least for me. Now if only I could do something about those dreadful orange bars...
Can anyone else corroborate with my results? I've also read online about an update - v10h - that "transforms" the phone into a lagless beast. Anyone received that update yet? Here's a link to the source: http://www.digitaltrends.com/cell-phone-reviews/lg-g-flex2-review/

I have the V10c-226-01 update, and the phone is ok.

happyjack96 said:
I was curious about this phone's overheating/lag problems, so I thought I'd try turning on Battery Saver. It seems to be much smoother now. Still not quite perfect, but it's a step forward; at least for me. Now if only I could do something about those dreadful orange bars...
Can anyone else corroborate with my results? I've also read online about an update - v10h - that "transforms" the phone into a lagless beast. Anyone received that update yet? Here's a link to the source: http://www.digitaltrends.com/cell-phone-reviews/lg-g-flex2-review/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will test the battery saver but it seems weird that it's impact performance in a positive way. It should limit it not the other way around.

That's strange how'd he get that update? A lot of people have received 10e just recently which is 2 updates away from that one. I'm still on 10c.
Sent from my LG-H959 using XDA Free mobile app

hey, guys, don't have the phone at the moment, but had anyone tried undervolting and underclocking?
The main reason i think, it should help, is because android ran perfectly smooth on my old HTC One X, with S4 Pro, quad-core @ 1500Mhz.
Afaik, we need a custom kernel to modify voltage, but underclocking may be the option for those, who suffers from overheating.

dark.wizard said:
hey, guys, don't have the phone at the moment, but had anyone tried undervolting and underclocking?
The main reason i think, it should help, is because android ran perfectly smooth on my old HTC One X, with S4 Pro, quad-core @ 1500Mhz.
Afaik, we need a custom kernel to modify voltage, but underclocking may be the option for those, who suffers from overheating.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The phone is undercloked by default to 1500Mhz.

Ronee33 said:
The phone is undercloked by default to 1500Mhz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No!
Download aida64

Bilux said:
No!
Download aida64
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right the update fixed it.
Sent from my LG-H955 using xda Forum

Bilux said:
No!
Download aida64
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure what you're talking about....
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my LG-H950 using XDA Free mobile app

gtamgs15 said:
Not sure what you're talking about....
Sent from my LG-H950 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hm?
1958MHz.... no 1500MHz limit!

Bilux said:
hm?
1958MHz.... no 1500MHz limit!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4 of my cores are running 1555.
Sent from my LG-H950 using XDA Free mobile app

I think the reason it runs better with Battery Saver is because it prevents it from overheating in the first place. Even with Battery Saver limiting the CPU to power sipping levels, it is still a fairly powerful CPU, certainly enough to run the OS. I'll run an Antutu Benchmark with it on vs off.

Okay, I ran the benchmarks. The results are very surprising! The score with Battery Saver on is 10000 points higher than with it off. Both results are after a clean boot and both were done with the device cool. Although, a benchmark I did 2 days ago with no Battery Saver had a score of 43000. That may have been because I had fewer apps installed.

I did the same tests. 1st one without battery saver on, 2nd with it on. I got similar results, but not as severe. Both were on a fresh boot. However the 2nd test was shortly after the first, so it might have been a little warm.
Test one :
Test two:
I guess we need to figure out what the battery saver is doing and make a permanent tweak.
Sent from my LG-H950 using XDA Free mobile app

it's limiting the top frequency of the processor, and maybe sets the governor to conservative, i guess.
You can turn it on, and check cpu frequency in sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq
(path may vary, it's from my Moto X, but i think, they're common)
Then turn it off, to see, if it changes.

I found something else interesting. I looked into the CPU info in Antutu, and, with Battery Saver off, the CPU max frequency was at 1.5ghz, but with BS on, it was 1.9ghz

happyjack96 said:
I found something else interesting. I looked into the CPU info in Antutu, and, with Battery Saver off, the CPU max frequency was at 1.5ghz, but with BS on, it was 1.9ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's interesting. I'm wondering if the benchmarks were updated to work with our processor.
Sent from my LG-H950 using XDA Premium HD app

BS seems to have no effect on my phone.
Why are your cold scores so low?

I've been running my G flex 2 with two A57 cores disabled. In typically averaging about 6 hours of screen on time. Just general use; YouTube, Facebook, looking up LG G4 reviews, texting, other social networking apps. Just wanted to say disabling cores has really worked out for me so far... I also accidentally deleted LGs stock UI, so I've been using nova

BillyxAllen said:
I've been running my G flex 2 with two A57 cores disabled. In typically averaging about 6 hours of screen on time. Just general use; YouTube, Facebook, looking up LG G4 reviews, texting, other social networking apps. Just wanted to say disabling cores has really worked out for me so far... I also accidentally deleted LGs stock UI, so I've been using nova
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did you disable the cores? Is there custom kernel for this phone?

Benchmarks

Since nobody have posted nothing about benchmarks on this awesome phone, here it is.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Here is a geekbench3 score on mine...

Last picture didn't post... let's try this again with another geekbench3 result I just got.

dandroid7 said:
Last picture didn't post... let's try this again with another geekbench3 result I just got.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome!
Sent from my SM-N920T using XDA Free mobile app

First time I ran this the day I got the phone I got about 4800 on geekbench3.
Since then, rooted and debloated a little at a time... it just keeps getting faster and smoother.
I got this score running the Noble Alpha kernel tonight, after removing more bloat.
Benchmarks in and of themselves do not prove much. But when comparing same device performance when tweaking, I do believe they are a good indication of performance loss or gains.
I can say... I'm impressed with the note 5.

Antutu

Quadrant...

Antutu Benchmark Score
Antutu Benchmark
Have a great day!

http://browser.primatelabs.com/battery3/141591 my battery test result. Running darthstalker rom v3 and skyhigh kernel 2.1

That's what I've gotten. And I've consistently gotten just over 70k, I am LOVING this phone

So is this good? How well does pcmark score on your device?

So i updated antutu to the latest beta 1 version 6..and here s the tally. Also ran a bunch of other tests...
Using darthstalker v4 with xposed running in the bakground, skyhigh 2.1 kernel with a57 locked to 2.4 and a general undervolt of -87.5mv accross the board (-100mv actually on the a53 cores) and 852mhz gpu clock (so basically i m kinda maxed out ) ) everything runs perfectly smooth and stable and my main goal with all.the tweaking actually is to know that i ll be golden till the note 7 comes out LOL (at least).

My highest scores

aldoblaga said:
So i updated antutu to the latest beta 1 version 6..and here s the tally. Also ran a bunch of other tests...
Using darthstalker v4 with xposed running in the bakground, skyhigh 2.1 kernel with a57 locked to 2.4 and a general undervolt of -87.5mv accross the board (-100mv actually on the a53 cores) and 852mhz gpu clock (so basically i m kinda maxed out ) ) everything runs perfectly smooth and stable and my main goal with all.the tweaking actually is to know that i ll be golden till the note 7 comes out LOL (at least).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Something wrong with my phone. I/O test is gonna fly

alexander1995 said:
Something wrong with my phone. I/O test is gonna flyView attachment 3548240
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome ???

aldoblaga said:
Awesome ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait for the official version to fix this bug

Antutu

I don't get why mine is so slow... I get the same general AnTuTu scores across stock, arter97, and now Skyhigh. It's the same with every benchmark, slower than it should be. =/
One thing I noticed... Synapse always shows Core 2 at -1C... I wonder if I have a faulty chip?

EtherealRemnant said:
I don't get why mine is so slow... I get the same general AnTuTu scores across stock, arter97, and now Skyhigh. It's the same with every benchmark, slower than it should be. =/
One thing I noticed... Synapse always shows Core 2 at -1C... I wonder if I have a faulty chip?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thermal throttling my friend. Try leaving the phone in a cool place for 10 minutes and then running another benchmark. Your scores should be around 69-70 or above, normally.

aldoblaga said:
Thermal throttling my friend. Try leaving the phone in a cool place for 10 minutes and then running another benchmark. Your scores should be around 69-70 or above, normally.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's some serious heat this chip produces. My 4940MX runs about as hot as the Exynos does lol
I'm sitting in a room where it's like 18C at the moment but I suppose I could stick it in the fridge.