[Q] Wifi Driver doesn't work. - Moto G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

I'm a developer of China, and my mobile type is XT1079(MOTO G 2014), I tyied to compile a linux kernel to replace the origin kernel, and I used the project provided by Motorala in github(https://github.com/MotorolaMobilityLLC/kernel-msm/tree/MMI-LXB22.46-28).And[/url] I edit the config file based on the "furnace" kernel config.
After I finishing compiling and replacing my kernel. I found the wifi doesn't work, there is a wifi.ko will be loaded, so I downloaded the opensource drvier(https://github.com/MotorolaMobilityLLC/vendor-qcom-opensource-wlan-prima/tree/MMI-LXB22.46-28[/url]), and compiled it.
But it doesn't work, I can get the same info from the kmsg log with the origin wlan.ko, but in wifi configure page it will be blocked and show no AP.
Also, the size of wlan.ko I compiled is 40MB, but the origin wlan.ko file is only 4MB
I don't know how to fix this problem, could you give me some advices?
I doubt that there are something wrong in my kernel config file

Another Chinese dude? Handshake
By the way, this is the Moto G (2013) forum, so I guess you should ask the moderator to move the thread into the dedicated forum for Moto G (2014).
Sent from Google Nexus 4 @ CM12
[WARNING: XDA Premium 4.0.13+ lacks Signature function - do not update]

Related

Building Kernel for Dream

Hello
As the prebuilt Kernel which comes with the dream-open project is not as cutting edge es I'd like it to be, I wanted to build the Kernel myself and checked out the sources for 2.6.29.
Now I've got some questions and problems:
Are there any known problems of using this kernel with the master branch? Are there any special/manual changes needed?
What are the best settings for the .config file to get a performance oriented and good kernel? Is msm_defconfig any good? (Maybe someone has a .config he could share with me?)
Are there any build time optimizations which would increase perfomance? (I read something about -O2)
Does only the WiFi Module have to be rebuilt?
When I played around, I got an error that a file (elf.h) is missing. How would I correct that/Which file is meant/Where would I get it?
It would be great if someone could answer these questions
Thank you very much

Developers - Merging Your Working Device

If you are a developer, and wish to have a device merged into Omni, here is the current "temporary" process to use. There are 2 ways to do this - make your tree available on github (or a similar service), or request a new git tree be created, and submit it to gerrit.
1) Get your device working. There's plenty of help available in #omnirom on Freenode if you need assistance. An AOSP device tree is probably the best place to get started.
2) Set up your device to use the OmniROM "custom" build type, rather than full/aosp. More information will follow on this step - check device/samsung/manta or device/lge/mako for an example.
3) Make your device tree available on github or a similar git service. Please retain authorship of an original tree (if you fork it from AOSP or another custom ROM)
4) Come to #omni on Freenode, and have a chat to one of the core developers (they are listed at the top of the user list) - they will be able to help you get your device merged
Please note, in order to add a new device, we will require a maintainer on an ongoing basis for it, to ensure someone is able to investigate bugs that users report on a device. Without this, we unfortunately cannot enable nightly builds for a device.
will a cm kernel tree work for the most part with just a few changes?
azoller1 said:
will a cm kernel tree work for the most part with just a few changes?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes - of course it must be 10.2 (4.3)
most likly it will work even unchanged
pulser_g2 said:
3) Make your device tree available on github or a similar git service. Please retain authorship of an original tree (if you fork it from AOSP or another custom ROM)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Along these lines, do NOT remove copyright attributions of a changed file. You may ADD copyrights to a header, but do NOT remove anything.
maxwen said:
yes - of course it must be 10.2 (4.3)
most likly it will work even unchanged
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most likely kernel change will be that reverting out that MDP sync point mess used by CM's AOSP+CAF frankendisplay. Can't link to it from my current location.
I have everything device sided transformed to Omni (m7ul,m7-common,and msm8960) and have exactly this problem now. Builds fine but Stucks after a few secs booting and hard reboots. Already looked into kmsg with maxwen but now we need to find what's causing it...
Reverted some stuff (MDP) kernel sided but haven't succeeded so far. Would be appreciated if u point us there when u back on a pc
noNeedForAsig
TF300T
OK here goes..
For the Asus Transformer TF300T the kernel forked from the CyanogenMod github:
https://github.com/scanno/android_kernel_asus_tf300t/tree/android-4.3
And the device tree, modified to get OmniROM to finish the build and get a bootable result:
https://github.com/scanno/android_device_asus_tf300t/tree/android-4.3
Hopefully it will be added to the OmniROM github.
n3ocort3x said:
I have everything device sided transformed to Omni (m7ul,m7-common,and msm8960) and have exactly this problem now. Builds fine but Stucks after a few secs booting and hard reboots. Already looked into kmsg with maxwen but now we need to find what's causing it...
Reverted some stuff (MDP) kernel sided but haven't succeeded so far. Would be appreciated if u point us there when u back on a pc
noNeedForAsig
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm thinking for m7ul it would be https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_kernel_htc_m7/commit/f2efb02581110747711c8b17f31f38fc3ed5dd1a
Don't want to hijack the thread though, so we can probably discuss this elsewhere
@Grarak Maybe you should post your edited device tree for Omni Rom =)
Sent From my i9500 With ☆★Crash Rom★☆
AL_IRAQI said:
@Grarak Maybe you should post your edited device tree for Omni Rom =)
Sent From my i9500 With ☆★Crash Rom★☆
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Already on my github
https://github.com/Grarak/android_device_samsung_i9500
kernel tree
https://github.com/Grarak/android_kernel_samsung_exynos5410
proprietary
https://github.com/Grarak/proprietary_vendor_samsung
exynos 5410 repos:
https://github.com/intervigilium/android_hardware_samsung_slsi_exynos5410
https://github.com/intervigilium/android_hardware_samsung_slsi_exynos
https://github.com/intervigilium/android_hardware_samsung_slsi_exynos5
https://github.com/intervigilium/android_hardware_samsung_slsi_exynos5-insignal
https://github.com/intervigilium/android_hardware_samsung_slsi_openmax
pretty much ^^
I'd like to maintain for l900 and i605 (Sprint and Verizon Galaxy Note 2).
device trees
https://github.com/omnirom-slickrick/android_device_samsung_l900 (sprint tree)
https://github.com/omnirom-slickrick/android_device_samsung_i605 (vzw tree)
https://github.com/omnirom-slickrick/android_device_samsung_t0lte (note 2 common tree)
https://github.com/omnirom-slickrick/android_device_samsung_smdk4412-common (same as tree on omnirom github but actually more updated and device settings added back)
kernel
https://github.com/omnirom-slickrick/android_kernel_samsung_smdk4412 (just have needed device settings commits added back in)
thracky said:
I'm thinking for m7ul it would be https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_kernel_htc_m7/commit/f2efb02581110747711c8b17f31f38fc3ed5dd1a
Don't want to hijack the thread though, so we can probably discuss this elsewhere
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we already making progress but it needs more work to be done.. at least we are now in system with working wifi, and display but modem doesent work.. something for tomorrow, and i dont want to hijack this thread too sorry if my question was in the wrong section but i thought i mention it because of the post above mine. nevermind i cann offer to maintain m7ul as already discussed with maxwen and oin IRC but a lot of work needs to be done:
here are my sources, device trees are usable but kernel needs more work as said above:
device trees:
https://github.com/n3ocort3x/android_device_htc_m7ul
https://github.com/n3ocort3x/android_device_htc_m7-common
https://github.com/n3ocort3x/android_device_htc_msm8960-common
kernel: its a modified one but its no problem to bring it back to stock features and will push as soon asap the modem stuff is sorted out
https://github.com/n3ocort3x/android_kernel_htc_m7
EDIT modem fixed, only BT left
@sykomaniac , look at first post and become a maintainer
pulser_g2 said:
If you are a developer, and wish to have a device merged into Omni, here is the current "temporary" process to use. There are 2 ways to do this - make your tree available on github (or a similar service), or request a new git tree be created, and submit it to gerrit.
1) Get your device working. There's plenty of help available in #omnirom on Freenode if you need assistance. An AOSP device tree is probably the best place to get started.
2) Set up your device to use the OmniROM "custom" build type, rather than full/aosp. More information will follow on this step - check device/samsung/manta or device/lge/mako for an example.
3) Make your device tree available on github or a similar git service. Please retain authorship of an original tree (if you fork it from AOSP or another custom ROM)
4) Post a link here to the device tree (and kernel repository) for review, and tell us what device it is (give model numbers and board names and as many details as possible )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We have quite a few things that aren't working like bluetooth, camera is buggy, H/W vsync, gps, and fm radio.
https://github.com/SeannyM/android_device_samsung_kylessopen
https://github.com/SeannyM/ba2x-kernel
gt-s7560m with quadband gsm and 850/1900/2100 WCDMA/UTMS
We have a MSM7227a cpu armv7 clocked at 1008mhz stock.
645mb of usable ram
4gb of storage with 1.7 usable
233 dpi 800x480 4inch screen
Adreno 200 enhanced
5mp camera 1.3 front facing
hopefully we can get something official
single sim
Gtab2 10.1 Wifi & 3G (p5110 & p5100)
There you have my device tree for omni
p5110 :
https://github.com/sevenup30/android_device_samsung_p5110
p5100:
https://github.com/sevenup30/android_device_samsung_p5100
omap4-common (had to edit it cuz of duplicate libion entry):
https://github.com/sevenup30/android_device_samsung_omap4-common
other dependencies required from CM & Themuppets
kernel :
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_kernel_samsung_espresso10
samsung proprietary:
https://github.com/TheMuppets/proprietary_vendor_samsung
samsung hardware:
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_hardware_samsung
apps samsung service:
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_packages_apps_SamsungServiceMode
Everything is working (sound / wifi / bluetooth / video playback) BUT!
I must edit build.prop by hand to get sound working until omni build process take care of "product_build_prop_overrides" into custom_XXXX.mk
see:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2484747
Original Samsung Galaxy Note
Samsung n7000 initial bringup:
Modified CM n7000 device: https://github.com/chasmodo/android_device_samsung_n7000/tree/android-4.3
Modified CM galaxys2-common: https://github.com/chasmodo/android_device_samsung_galaxys2-common/tree/android-4.3
CM smdk4412 kernel: https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_kernel_samsung_smdk4412/tree/cm-10.2
Samsung proprietary stuff: https://github.com/TheMuppets/proprietary_vendor_samsung/tree/cm-10.2
Samsung hardware tree untouched from OmniRom.
Device info:
Board platform - exynos4
SOC - exynos4210
Board name - smdk4210
Kernel specifics - unified kernel and recovery
It compiles fine using the repos listed above, but throws up a kernel assert error when flashing the Rom. Several compilers for different devices complained about it in the 'All the answers' thread. The way out of this is to flash a CM10.2 kernel immediately after the Rom flash aborts, then Omni boots up fine.
What works:
1. telephony
2. mms
3. WiFi
4. GPS
What doesn't work:
1. data
2. bluetooth turns off as soon as you turn it on
3. both sdcards are invisible from Android; all your stuff is there when you drop into recovery, though
4. Settings/Storage FC when tapped - see #3
5. Performance options also FC
6. Notification drawer cannot be pulled down
Camera cannot be tested because it shuts down as soon as you start it, saying: "No external storage available" - again, see #3
Galaxy Note II / N7100 (International)
Samsung Galaxy Note II / N7100 Bring up details.
I have a working build of the Omni rom for the N7100. Below are the details on what is working and not working. i have been using it for the last 2 days, so far not crashes or reboots all seems to be working fine. i cherry picked a few commits and included it into my build
Working :
WIFI
DATA -3G & 2G
Telephony & MMS & SMS
GPS
Sound
Camera (Both Front and Back)
SD card
Performance control
Notification drawer & Lights
Multi-Window
roadrunner
Not Working :
BT
Backlights(if i install a custom kernel then the lights work)
Device Tree for N7100 - https://github.com/tilaksidduram/device_samsung_n7100
Device smdk4412-common - https://github.com/tilaksidduram/android_device_samsung_smdk4412-common
smdk-4412 Kernel (3.0.100) - https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_kernel_samsung_smdk4412
samsung hardware - https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_hardware_samsung
DEVICE: GT-N7100
sources
https://www.github.com/UtkarshGupta/android_device_samsung_n7100
https://www.github.com/omnirom/android_device_samsung_smdk4412-common
https://www.github.com/omnirom/android_hardware_samsung
https://www.github.com/omnirom/android_kernel_samsung_smdk4412
https://www.github.com/TheMuppets/proprietary_vendor_samsung
Is anyone else working on d2att/d2can (Galaxy S3 I747)? I'm not overly familiar with ROM development, but I can compile CM10.2 for this device just fine, and I'm slowly working on getting Omni to compile for it as well. If someone more experienced than I is already working on it though, I'll probably just let them do it.
If I am the only one, expect some newb-ish questions in the near future.
dstruct2k said:
Is anyone else working on d2att/d2can (Galaxy S3 I747)? I'm not overly familiar with ROM development, but I can compile CM10.2 for this device just fine, and I'm slowly working on getting Omni to compile for it as well. If someone more experienced than I is already working on it though, I'll probably just let them do it.
If I am the only one, expect some newb-ish questions in the near future.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think a few are... There has been chat of it in the IRC channels.
Device name: LG Optimus 4X HD
Codename: P880
Board name: X3
Chipset: Tegra 3 AP33
Everything works, except button backlight.
https://github.com/Adam77Root/android_device_lge_p880
https://github.com/Adam77Root/android_kernel_lge_x3
https://github.com/TheMuppets/proprietary_vendor_lge

[PROJECT][RECRUITING] Developers/coders wanted for kernel building team!

After long thoughts.. I have hatched an idea.
I need all the developers and coders I can to join with me to create a dev-team for a new line of kernel (Specifically for USB WiFi adapter support with CyanogenMod ROMs, for SGS-i9505, otherwize known as fjltexx)
•This kernel will have OTG driver support for most atheros chipset USB wireless adapters
•Inspired by me, due to limited to NO support for this ROM or device model for this specific capability
•Will come with ath9k modules, and other common modules and drivers
•Easy flash through zip file of the kernel
________Once again: DEVELOPERS NEEDED______
TO JOIN:
IM Me on Skype: dsman444, message me on here, or post "Join" below,
Any questions?
Message me or post below.
Ive made CM roms in the past but never released them and building a kernel would be awesome, can i join to learn and help also? Greets
Sent from my GT-I9505 using app: XDA Premium and rom: CarbonRom

[Completed] Partially building a custom rom

Hello there,
I am currently having a One Plus One. I have multi-rom utlity which allows me to have multiple android OS installed.
Currently the cyanogenmod based custom Marshmallow Rom I use (http://forum.xda-developers.com/one...m-kernel-unofficial-cyanogenmod-13-0-t3242700) has switched over to using stable CM branch as their rom base. So this requires using Super SU for root access. Unfortunately Super Su is not compatible with Multirom implementation for OPO.
One suggestion provided was to try building the custom rom from source with user-debug flag. Meanwhile I came across two build.prop values (ro.build.type=userdebug ; persist.sys.root_access=1) which I hoped would enable inbuilt superuser without rebuilding the rom from source but they did not work.
So for now, there seems to be no other way around building from source ( I wanted to avoid this as much as possible because I have a very slow Internet access downloading 30 GB or so for the ROM alone will take a month for me).
So here are my 2 questions:
1> The rom developer in the thread mentioned in 2nd para, talks about 2 source (Kernel and the rest). When I looked at the manifest, they talk about replacing something. So does this mean I need to download the cyanogenmod sources as well or does repo sync take care of that automatically ?
2> I assume the kernel and rom need to be built separately. Can the "userdebug" mode be enabled only by rebuilding the kernel and then placing it with rest of the rom build zip provided by the developer to avoid rebuilding the whole rom ? or better yet flash the my userdebug kernel again after the normal rom installation ?
Thanks In Advance
crazydude10 said:
Hello there,
I am currently having a One Plus One. I have multi-rom utlity which allows me to have multiple android OS installed.
Currently the cyanogenmod based custom Marshmallow Rom I use (http://forum.xda-developers.com/one...m-kernel-unofficial-cyanogenmod-13-0-t3242700) has switched over to using stable CM branch as their rom base. So this requires using Super SU for root access. Unfortunately Super Su is not compatible with Multirom implementation for OPO.
One suggestion provided was to try building the custom rom from source with user-debug flag. Meanwhile I came across two build.prop values (ro.build.type=userdebug ; persist.sys.root_access=1) which I hoped would enable inbuilt superuser without rebuilding the rom from source but they did not work.
So for now, there seems to be no other way around building from source ( I wanted to avoid this as much as possible because I have a very slow Internet access downloading 30 GB or so for the ROM alone will take a month for me).
So here are my 2 questions:
1> The rom developer in the thread mentioned in 2nd para, talks about 2 source (Kernel and the rest). When I looked at the manifest, they talk about replacing something. So does this mean I need to download the cyanogenmod sources as well or does repo sync take care of that automatically ?
2> I assume the kernel and rom need to be built separately. Can the "userdebug" mode be enabled only by rebuilding the kernel and then placing it with rest of the rom build zip provided by the developer to avoid rebuilding the whole rom ? or better yet flash the my userdebug kernel again after the normal rom installation ?
Thanks In Advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Greetings,
Please read the Sticky threads for XDA Assist. This is not a help desk. XDA Assist is for helping new members or visitors navigate this site. You are a Senior Member and therefore you should know how to use the search feature and find the correct thread to ask your questions.
Thanks for understanding.
Thread closed.

General OnePlus releases kernel source for Nord CE 2

OnePlus released it's kernel source for Nord CE 2, which runs on MediaTek Dimensity 900 ( MT6877).
The kernel source code can be viewed on GitHub.
my nord ce 2 heat up very fast after updating the latest update available. i dont think it is normal. is it the cause by the recent update or the apps installed in my phone or the hardware? please, i need suggestion. thanks.
After some struggling and some point out why drivers weren't built.
(Wifi and bt) i managed to get them working.
Turns out there was some dumb configs not enabled and wrong *driver* name* being built.
Apparently ONEPLUS didn't define
MTK_COMBO_BT=y in defconfig
Neither did the wifi driver being correctly named when built. It would get some info (of what build info reported) then name it after that.
Instead of wlan_drv_gem4m it was named wlan_axi_6877 so the kernel never wanted to start the driver due to wrong name. So it failed to load the driver because of that.
Now A.09 can be ran with a permissive kernel and WiFi and BT WORKING
I've forked and tweaked the kernel source to get wifi and Bluetooth working.
Kernel source:
GitHub - Ko-Hi-Dev/android_kernel_4.14_oneplus_mt6877
Contribute to Ko-Hi-Dev/android_kernel_4.14_oneplus_mt6877 development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
Vendor modules
GitHub - Ko-Hi-Dev/android_vendor_mediatek_kernel_modules_mt6877
Contribute to Ko-Hi-Dev/android_vendor_mediatek_kernel_modules_mt6877 development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com

Categories

Resources