Database Info

Renesas Emma EV2 Open Source Project

Hi,
Altough this is just the skeleton of it, let me share what I've set up until now.
I've also started a dedicated Google group here: https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups#!members/renesas-emev-osp
Anyone interested in contributing to develpment, plesae join!
1) Android
https://github.com/ffxx68/Renesas-device_emev
This is the entry-point to the GitHub repositories where I would put all the modification to the AOSP code which are specific to the Renesas EMEV for our Open Source Project.
Have a look at the README for further details and follow the progress, or open discussions, on our Google group.
2) Kernel
https://github.com/ffxx68/RenesasEV2-BSPGB-Kernel
This is the public GitHub repository for the 2.6.35.7 Kernel source code. It is customized to emxx code and it includes for the moment only the LCD patch that is necessary for the most common tablet (the kernel base code is aimed at the development board instead).
Same as above, anyone can contribute directly here.
3) Bootloader
https://github.com/ffxx68/RenesasEV2-bootloader
This is the public GitHub repository for the bootloader source code. It includes a patch for the 4 DDR tablet models.
I don't expect this to be changed much, but anyone can contribute directly pushing new files over here too.
4) Packaging
Some more details about how to wrap-up a fresh build and make a firmware for the tablet are found in the README mentieod above.
I've managed to boot Android from an SD card (see here: https://github.com/ffxx68/Renesas-BootSD) and I think a similar approach should be followed, at least for initial testing.

Kind of late to the party, but I'm really interested in this project... I applied to the Google Group, but I notice that the EV2 AOSP page you listed is gone... is there a specific reason for this? I would really love to contribute to this.

Hi, and welcome aboard!
I have edited a couple links above, which have changed a bit since then.
Thanks

I'm facing a problem with the touchscreen driver, which I have filed in the group list as well:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/renesas-emev-osp/smcwddwvNDo
(answer over there, if possible).
I can't understand why the driver for the touchscreen (found in drivers/input/touchscreen/pixcir_i2c_ts.c) is not loaded during the kernel init stages.
The touchkeys driver (ekt2201) is very similar in code structure and it's loaded as expected, while the _probe function of the PixCir is never called. This is the fragment from the dmesg kernel log:
...
<4>ekt2201_init
<4>ekt2201_i2c_ts_probe
<6>input: ekt2201 as /devices/i2c-0/0-0010/input/input0
<4>ekt2201:i2c_add_driver 0
<4>emxx_tsixcir_i2c_init
<4>emxx_tsixcir:i2c_add_driver 0
...
Note as the input device is created for the ekt2201 as the _probe is called, while the same doesn't happen for the pixcir.
Anyone with a clue?
thanks

Hi,
if anyone's interested in testing an experimental, pre-alpha version of the Open Source GB and Kernel build, leave a message here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en&fromgroups#!topic/renesas-emev-osp/Mmd8r-YMaNo

Porting to JB has started: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/renesas-emev-osp/XSdLmPgD9Og

Essential prerequisites for X2 Android development [Crowdsourcing]

There is 3 packages needed for any device for an original Android development:
Android source tree, preferably the original as with OEM devices but CyanogenMod or independent ports are enough too. Aka device
Kernel sources for the device. Aka kernel
Vendor proprietary drivers, which make the GPU and various sensors work. If not explicitly available for download they need to be extracted from a running device. Aka vendor
If these three packages are all available, making new roms will be easy for developers. Please co-operate to gather all of them here to be a resource for android developers.
If we could achieve this goal, I would port the Ubuntu OS for Nokia X2 and share it here with you
====
Progress:
Android source tree
No known instant or effort.
Can anyone contact to Microsoft mobile and get the Android source tree for Nokia X2 and upload it to Github?
Kernel sources
here is kernel source code for Nokia RM-1013 2.0.0.11: https://github.com/danialbehzadi/Nokia-RM-1013-2.0.0.11
Due to Microsoft mobile statement, there is no difference in kernel between 2.0.0.11 and 2.1.0.13.
DONE! :good:
Proprietary drivers
Thanks to T4ufik_Hidayat, Here is vendor packages: https://github.com/cm-nokia-x2/proprietary_vendor_nokia_ara
DONE! :good:

Nice effort

You are our only hope
As we have no real devs for this device and the device wasn't released globally, u r our only hope. I request u to build the kernel with device tree that we need so much to port any real android rom like AOSP , please. Frozentears was working on that, You can contact him as well.
Again, I request you, please make us a custom kernel so that we noobs can start porting KitKat/Lollipop for our beloved X2DS, u r our only hope because we see no other developer here for this device.

danialbehzadi said:
There is 3 packages needed for any device for an original Android development:
Android source tree, preferably the original as with OEM devices but CyanogenMod or independent ports are enough too
Kernel sources for the device
Vendor proprietary drivers, which make the GPU and various sensors work. If not explicitly available for download they need to be extracted from a running device.
If these three packages are all available, making new roms will be easy for developers. Please co-operate to gather all of them here to be a resource for android developers.
If we could achieve this goal, I would port the Ubuntu OS for Nokia X2 and share it here with you
====
Progress:
Android source tree
No known instant or effort.
Can anyone contact to Microsoft mobile and get the Android source tree for Nokia X2 and upload it to Github?
Kernel sources
here is kernel source code for Nokia RM-1013 2.0.0.11: https://github.com/danialbehzadi/Nokia-RM-1013-2.0.0.11
Due to Microsoft mobile statement, there is no difference in kernel between 2.0.0.11 and 2.1.0.13.
DONE! :good:
Proprietary drivers
No known instant or effort.
Does anyone know how to extract it? Can anyone contact to Microsoft mobile and get them and upload it to Github?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is for proprietary https://github.com/cm-nokia-x2/proprietary_vendor_nokia_ara
for Android source tree, try to use CyanogenMod.
maybe you can help people to make the complete rebuild of CyanogenMod with full fixed from bugs

danialbehzadi said:
There is 3 packages needed for any device for an original Android development:
Android source tree, preferably the original as with OEM devices but CyanogenMod or independent ports are enough too. Aka device
Kernel sources for the device. Aka kernel
Vendor proprietary drivers, which make the GPU and various sensors work. If not explicitly available for download they need to be extracted from a running device. Aka vendor
If these three packages are all available, making new roms will be easy for developers. Please co-operate to gather all of them here to be a resource for android developers.
If we could achieve this goal, I would port the Ubuntu OS for Nokia X2 and share it here with you
====
Progress:
Android source tree
No known instant or effort.
Can anyone contact to Microsoft mobile and get the Android source tree for Nokia X2 and upload it to Github?
Kernel sources
here is kernel source code for Nokia RM-1013 2.0.0.11: https://github.com/danialbehzadi/Nokia-RM-1013-2.0.0.11
Due to Microsoft mobile statement, there is no difference in kernel between 2.0.0.11 and 2.1.0.13.
DONE! :good:
Proprietary drivers
Thanks to T4ufik_Hidayat, Here is vendor packages: https://github.com/cm-nokia-x2/proprietary_vendor_nokia_ara
DONE! :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://github.com/cm-nokia-x2/
android_kernel_nokia_msm8610-kernel source
proprietary_vendor_nokia_ara-vendor
android_device_nokia_ara- device(boardconfig.mk, other configs)
And here is the manifest
https://github.com/cm-nokia-x2/android_local_manifest

Use CM device tree to compile Omni

Hello,
I recently compiled CyanogenMod 14.1 for my Android device using the official sources and want to compile Omni 7.1 for the same device and use the device tree and kernel from the official CM sources because there's no device tree for Omni. Is there a way to "convert" the CM device tree to work with the Omni sources? My exact problem is the compiler doesn't know my device so I can't run something like "brunch [device]" or "make [device]", although I already downloaded all device-specific repositories to the same subdirectory as I'd do it on CM.
Thanks in advance,
Oebbler

Oebbler1 said:
Hello,
I recently compiled CyanogenMod 14.1 for my Android device using the official sources and want to compile Omni 7.1 for the same device and use the device tree and kernel from the official CM sources because there's no device tree for Omni. Is there a way to "convert" the CM device tree to work with the Omni sources? My exact problem is the compiler doesn't know my device so I can't run something like "brunch [device]" or "make [device]", although I already downloaded all device-specific repositories to the same subdirectory as I'd do it on CM.
Thanks in advance,
Oebbler
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to go to your android_device_manufacturer_yourphonecodename repo and rename cm.mk to omni_codename.mk, open it and change cm_codename to omni_codename.
You have also to rename cm.dependencies to omni.dependencies, but the repos included in that file may not be in omnirom source, so you would need to manually sync those repos in your android sorce tree.
You might have to make other minor changes, take a look at the rest of code in that repo.
For further info: https://docs.omnirom.org/Porting_Omni_To_Your_Device

Thank you, but I think I won't succeed in building Omni for my device because I always get strange errors.

Probs will get annoyed, cmsdk, cmhw, and cm encryption are significantly annoying. Also they moved their build dir, generally include useless common subtrees, and named dtbtool with CM suffix. Their build tree might be the most significant hindrance to unified building on Android, not only for the many unnecessary additions and dependencies they have for devices, but also they generally lack a community presence to answer or respond to users, so a lot of us get stuck with cleaning up their mess.
Notice how TWRP has a community presence here and are helpful. I'm not hating on cm, they have been doing this longer than most of us, but for ease id recommend using your rom choices tree.
Also the immensely significant annoyance of having to track devicesettings and the unwillingnes to nuke cmactions, combine it with cmsdk, or at least remove it's dependency in most trees is almost certainly going to cause you errors.
Sent from my One using XDA-Developers Legacy app

Poco F1, android r (11), running a GKI kernel (linux kernel 5.4)

I found this on youtube not sure if its real or not
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SRqxkMpeMc
Poco F1, running a GKI kernel, and device specific modules loaded separately.
Video by Sumit Semwal
Additional Details:
* Xiaomi Pocof1 (beryllium) device config is hosted at:
https://github.com/pundiramit/device-...
* GKI (android-5.4.17) Image.gz and kernel modules are copied from
device/linaro/dragonboard-kernel project, built as part of the Android
CI.
* Kernel source for prebuilt vendor kernel modules (panel, labibb
regulator) and DTB is hosted at:
https://github.com/pundiramit/linux/t...
* Adreno firmware binaries are copied from stock PocoF1 images.

Yes, it's real. Don't be fooled by the Android R in About Phone - that's just what it says when you're running an AOSP master build. That's not what's important. What's more important is what they've done with the kernel.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/arstec...inline-linux-kernel-support-in-android/?amp=1
Tom Gall, the director of the Linaro Consumer Group, showed off a Xiaomi Poco F1 actually running the mainline Linux kernel under the usual Android OS. Gall told the audience, "There are major, major props to be given to the Google Kernel Team in particular for getting their code upstream so that we can boot devices with a mainline kernel
---------- Post added at 09:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:19 AM ----------
good job brother for for trying to bring it to masses.

Repo's are gone :'(
Anybody get a clone of the second repo at least? PM or post, please!
This is well documented now on AOSP but the work done here would save a lot of time.

CosmicDan said:
Repo's are gone :'(
Anybody get a clone of the second repo at least? PM or post, please!
This is well documented now on AOSP but the work done here would save a lot of time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GitHub - pundiramit/linux
Contribute to pundiramit/linux development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com

D1stRU3T0R said:
GitHub - pundiramit/linux
Contribute to pundiramit/linux development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah thank you, there was only an extra t on the second URL - typo.
This is awesome. Hopefully more 845 devices get the GKI treatment so we can experiment with different modules from other devices that get more love/attention from OEM's

General [info] Xiaomi 13 (fuxi) Open Source Kernel and Lineage Device Tree

Hi all,
For those of you, like me, who are interested in learning more about developing for custom ROMs, the following links will be helpful for finding .
First is the inclusive list of open source kernel releases by Xiaomi: https://github.com/MiCode/Xiaomi_Kernel_OpenSource
At the bottom of said list is the Xiaomi 13 (fuxi).
Second is the device tree (based on Lineage OS and said to be WIP) by YuKongA: https://github.com/YuKongA/device_xiaomi_fuxi

What is the primary difference between official xiaomi 13's device tree https://github.com/MiCode/kernel_devicetree/tree/fuxi-t-oss and https://github.com/YuKongA/device_xiaomi_fuxi ?

YuKongA's contribution is for Lineage OS, or instead of MIUI it's AOSP. I think.

To give additional information, the Lineage-derived device tree likely originates from: https://github.com/imasaru/android_device_tree_template

Also, the kernel includes a lot of stuff for the hardware and is accompanied by a kernel device tree, which is a kind of 'table of contents' (unless I'm mistaken about the analogy).
"The 'Open Firmware Device Tree', or simply Devicetree (DT), is a data structure and language for describing hardware."
Linux and the Devicetree — The Linux Kernel documentation
I imagine a lot of compatibility issues are lining up the system image and the kernel+device tree.
...
(At this point, I'm really just spouting off some things as I'm learning, so feel free to correct or ignore me as I'm going along!)

Aquariuslt said:
What is the primary difference between official xiaomi 13's device tree https://github.com/MiCode/kernel_devicetree and https://github.com/YuKongA/device_xiaomi_fuxi ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1/Xiaomi Kernel OpenSource
2/Xiaomi fuxi prebuilt

Veiranx said:
To give additional information, the Lineage-derived device tree likely originates from: https://github.com/imasaru/android_device_tree_template
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can find older ones.