Hi I currently running stock there is something better for battery life?
And BTW is there a good stable build of lollipop?
Thx you all!
Sent from my A0001 using XDA Free mobile app
Stock and Franco is good for battery life. Ak is good for balance of performance and battery life. It's all objective tbh, try and see what works for you.
Good stable build I recommend that I personally use is Robbies Sabermod lollipop builds, it's stable enough for daily use for me. Everything works aside from a few nitpicky things.
Related
I have been using NScollab for a little bit but I have noticed that I eat about 10% battery every hour and that is on standby. What would you guys recommend as the Best Rom for battery life right now for Nexus S? Is there a better Kernel/Rom mix to use?
Thanks in advance for the help.
Stock ROM + TUV11 or XTEUV92.
Peter Alfonso's ROM
I am using about 50% per day.
I would say Oxygen 2.3.1. I've tried a few others, incluing BugLess Beast and I can honestly say that I like Oxygen the most. It's slick, I go to bed with 50% on my battery at night with about 2 hours screen time and is always on the latest version of the AOSP code. On 2.3.7 at the moment.
http://forum.oxygen.im/viewtopic.php?id=1111
+1 for oxygen, or try carbon, based off oxygen
Sent from my SNES
cm7 nightly with its own kernel is not bad. i use 50% per day too.
Try SuperOSR its the most stable and quick that i have tasted
Enviado desde mi Nexus S usando Tapatalk
Best for battery life is stock.
Or you can always try Oxygen + TUV 10/ TEUV.
bedalus said:
+1 for oxygen, or try carbon, based off oxygen
Sent from my SNES
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just a little question .. i am running CM9 RC1 and i find it less stable then CM9 RC0 and i dont know why but i feel like the battery drains out more quickly than before.
so if my main priority is battery life (along with some smoothness)
what other Rom i could think of? any suggestion ???
I don't agree that stock I'd better than custom rom. I'm using nexusMV, the battery performance is pretty good. So far I think it is best to use for my nexus s.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Resurrection Remix with trinity kernel, 1d7h and 29% of battery left
rom: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1717094
Kernel: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1036996
Weapons 2.6 or EB 2.2 I'm currently using weapon 2.6 which is better and why
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
Uhm... you have to define the terms here buddy. Like, are you interested in battery life, or usability, or performance, or stability, or modifications?
I'm on weapon 2.6 using Faux Pre-OC/UV kernel with it undervolted a lot.
Running fine with good battery life here.
aplsux said:
Uhm... you have to define the terms here buddy. Like, are you interested in battery life, or usability, or performance, or stability, or modifications?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i just wanted something different so i switched over to EB 2.3.5 witch is running pretty nice right now. also ill keep that in mind next time i ask that kind of Question thank you
I was just wondering which kernel would be good to use on the NS with an MIUI rom for battery life? Been switching between Trinity's TUV10 and Matr1x's 10.5 and 9.5 cfs.
I usually get around 20-24 hours usage once it's off the charger. My usage is moderate... I listen to music for about an hour a day, check the news for about 15 mins.. a few texts and usually no calls.
Any of you guys out there using an MIUI rom but is setup more towards battery life rather than performance?
Thanks!
hardly archive that... MIUI is battery killer
i use franco , pretty good , you should have tried it , but latest version has not good battery life as before , hope it will improve...
------
personal advice , why don't you buy an additional battery ... then you won't have to worry battery life anymore
better yet , use 2G instead of 3G when you check up the news
Matr1x 11.0 man
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Woah didn't know 11.0 was out already.
Thanks for the update.
Btw amazing kernel you have there
Sent from my Google Nexus S using XDA App
It would be nice to see a comparison of NS kernels (on the same conditions, of course)
I think i'll check your ROM in the next days, mathkid95
Now using matrix 11.0 cfs, 800/100 smartassv2, disabled deep idle. Performance is still pretty good and battery life has increased by a few hours
Sent from my Google Nexus S using XDA App
IMO updated his TouchWiz kernel yesterday. Up until today I was using Scott's CleanKernel. Both are amazing kernels in my eyes. Both kernels are undervolted and overclocked. I had no issues with CleanKernel at all. I always seems to have bad battery life on the leanKernel until I flashed the updated .4 version this morning. Battery life seems much better compared to any leanKernel before the update. When running CleanKernel, I got a quadrant score of 4980. With leanKernel 0.4 I got 5160, both at stock 1.5GHz. I just want to see if others have noticed what I have between these two kernels.
You forgot that both are released in the Development section. A place where this thread does NOT belong...
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
how do i move or delete it?
vx2ko said:
how do i move or delete it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A mod will move it in when they get a chance.
Just so you know in the future,
if your not a developer its always safe to open up new threads in the Q and A section. (At least that's my rule for myself.. it saves you from the "I'm having a bad day so I will take it out on this guy" post)
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
drbveb88 said:
A mod will move it in when they get a chance.
Just so you know in the future,
if your not a developer its always safe to open up new threads in the Q and A section. (At least that's my rule for myself.. it saves you from the "I'm having a bad day so I will take it out on this guy" post)
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
XDA needs more people like you. Great reply and it made sense.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
This was handled nicely, thanks guys!
In the future OP pay attention to where you post and
read forum rules and stickies before posting
Thread Moved
FNM
Now that this has been moved can we get back on topic? What is yalls experience with these two kernels?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
personally i like leankernal because of how light and simple it is. no unneccesary weight and battery life is great.
Clean kernel is closer to stock than imos kernel which is kinda good and bad. The more you modify the kernel the more chance you'll have of breaking something but you also have the posabilty of making it way better if done right and everything comes out ok.
I would expect clean kernel to be more stable, less battery efficient, and a little slower overall. Where imos kernel could vary drastically with each update due to more major things being edited or changed. Right now imos beta. 4 has pretty good battery life over stock and is stable.
Personally I try the more modified stuff first and if I don't feel it pays off I move to something more stable or closer to stock until an update is released or problem addressed. Just my. 02
Sent from my Galaxy S III
vx2ko said:
Now that this has been moved can we get back on topic? What is yalls experience with these two kernels?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Clean Kernel is under volt by default for a given frequency. That is why the battery life is better. If you are looking for both performance and battery life, you should over clock Clean Kernel frequency to 1.89 (default is 1.5) max and min should be 400 range. GPU in Clean Kernel is also over clocked. "stable" is the key word to differentiate between the two. I would think that Clean Kernel is the most stable kernel of all. For speed they should be the same, for bells and whistles, Lean kernel would be your choice. To sum up, Clean Kernel give you both world, stable, performance and battery life... unless you want something else beside those 3.
Clienterror said:
Clean kernel is closer to stock than imos kernel which is kinda good and bad. The more you modify the kernel the more chance you'll have of breaking something but you also have the posabilty of making it way better if done right and everything comes out ok.
I would expect clean kernel to be more stable, less battery efficient, and a little slower overall. Where imos kernel could vary drastically with each update due to more major things being edited or changed. Right now imos beta. 4 has pretty good battery life over stock and is stable.
Personally I try the more modified stuff first and if I don't feel it pays off I move to something more stable or closer to stock until an update is released or problem addressed. Just my. 02
Sent from my Galaxy S III
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you on the kernel changing concept. And I have also noticed that .4 is much better than .3
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
buhohitr said:
Clean Kernel is under volt by default for a given frequency. That is why the battery life is better. If you are looking for both performance and battery life, you should over clock Clean Kernel frequency to 1.89 (default is 1.5) max and min should be 400 range. GPU in Clean Kernel is also over clocked. "stable" is the key word to differentiate between the two. I would think that Clean Kernel is the most stable kernel of all. For speed they should be the same, for bells and whistles, Lean kernel would be your choice. To sum up, Clean Kernel give you both world, stable, performance and battery life... unless you want something else beside those 3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you're a cleankernel guy? I definitely agree with you about this being all three things. So as far as the GPU being overclocked, why does lean kernel .4 perform better in games
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
vx2ko said:
So you're a cleankernel guy? I definitely agree with you about this being all three things. So as far as the GPU being overclocked, why does lean kernel .4 perform better in games
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like I have mentioned, if you aiming for gaming performance then you better to use lean, but then your battery life wouldn't be too good. Most of people just want a fast stable phone and a good battery life for daily use, then Clean will be a better choice. The reason it's stable because no tweaks to it except for OC/UV. Have you tried to play game with Clean over clocked to 1.89?
buhohitr said:
Like I have mentioned, if you aiming for gaming performance then you better to use lean, but then your battery life wouldn't be too good. Most of people just want a fast stable phone and a good battery life for daily use, then Clean will be a better choice. The reason it's stable because no tweaks to it except for OC/UV. Have you tried to play game with Clean over clocked to 1.89?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I never thought of overclocking and playing the game until now. I guess Im just used to being at stock. But I will give it a try and see how that works. But what your saying definitely makes sense and should clear some things up. Performace + battery life = cleankernel. PERFORMANCE + PERFORMANCE = leankernel. Although the battery life on leankernel has dramatically been improved.
vx2ko said:
Actually I never thought of overclocking and playing the game until now. I guess Im just used to being at stock. But I will give it a try and see how that works. But what your saying definitely makes sense and should clear some things up. Performace + battery life = cleankernel. PERFORMANCE + PERFORMANCE = leankernel. Although the battery life on leankernel has dramatically been improved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha.. you got it...almost.. Performance+battery life+stable=Clean. Super perfornance -less battery life - 10% stable=Lean kernel. Good luck bro.
ok I just setup an app profile in setcpu. so now everytime im in my game, its overclocked. When im using it normally, its at stock speed. With the screen off, its at min 190 and max 452. so far so good!
.5 is up now with more fixes.
http://rootzwiki.com/index.php?/topic/31329-[kernel][touchwiz]-Leankernel:-Minimalistic-Kernel-(8/28---v0.5)
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Thanks for the heads up! More battery drain fixes. Although it says in order to revert back to stock we have to flash a ROM with a kernel. Would a nan backup work? Anyone tests the kernel yet
Any good suggestions for the best kernel for battery life for cm11 ? Screenshots of your battery stats would be nice.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
the best http://forum.xda-developers.com/google-nexus-5/help/best-rom-kernel-threads-t2477889
blackcell1 said:
Any good suggestions for the best kernel for battery life for cm11 ? Screenshots of your battery stats would be nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
At least: Kernel discussions.
And Nexus 5 Battery Results.
All you want is here, need a bit reading and testing by yourself. And it's not the kernel that makes your battery life, but mainly your use and settings.
And simms22 summed well
No offense but I think a mod will see this as best ROM/ kernel discussion.
If I ran CM I would go with Chaos because of the NXT tweaks app that comes with it. I used Chaos before they went CAF exclusively and just recently switched to Elemental X, which does have a CAF and non-CAF