Related
hey guys just rooted now im looking for a great stock kernel that i can overclock and UC. Any suggestions.
I am stock root and use Adrynalyne's kernals. For me they work great and help with battery alot..
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1024338
thanks for the quick reply. I thank you!
I'm using battery sipper or w/e its called
hey what kind of setup do you have...should i have it ondemand?
Most people use on demand or smartass. Test them out and see what works for you
I've been trying to use Adrynalyne's kernels because they feel very snappy, but I'm having radio issues with those kernels, so I've switched back to Drod's and it's been rock solid for me. Also seeing the best battery life from Drod's kernel as well.
Here's a vote for imoseyons kernel also used in the TeslaCoil rom. I've had great experience with them and great battery life too.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
The one in my sig.
I'm getting great battery life now. I love this phone even more!
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
magicriggs said:
I'm getting great battery life now. I love this phone even more!
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What did you go with?
Jrocker23 said:
I am stock root and use Adrynalyne's kernals. For me they work great and help with battery alot..
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1024338
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using this one. Going to use it for a week to truly test it out, but loving it so far.
Nothing to test, the kernels are amazing, hes even testing out audio boosting on them now so the in call volume will go higher.
Hey guys I'm proud to say j just got a Droid charge. I'm loving it. But I'm wondering which froyo rom is the better one, humble, or gummycharged. On this I mean based on the performance, battery life, and ui. Please help me out here guys! Thanks in advance
Sincerely,
The new proud owner of a Droid charge: D
Humble for battery life. Gummy for features. Try both.
Sent from my SCH-I510 using Tapatalk
Grats on your new Charge! I can guarantee you'll be satisfied :]
To put it short, Humble has better battery life, great animations(like moving from page to page), great speed with no hints of lag(pretty much the same as GC in this department), UI is exactly the same(which is a stock GB look, the only difference is Humble has a better battery indicator from the start), it doesn't randomly reboot like GC did for me(and plenty of other people) and it's updated MUCH more then GC is.
Humble clearly wins this fight, I had GC for a few weeks and I think Humble suits me much more.
blarrick said:
Humble has ... great animations(like moving from page to page).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I found Humble's animations extremely annoying, FWIW, and since personal preferences win in the end you'd probably be best off trying both and just going with the one you like.
I'd also definitely suggest you try Eclipse, which is what I settled on myself. It's a fantastic ROM all-around (which is what I expected from Nitro after his great work on the Fascinate). And it has a very nice custom theme to boot.
Any battery life advantage humble has is due to imnuts kernel being packaged in...if you flash that kernel with gc you would get virtually identical batt life I'm sure
99% percent of battery life differences are always going to be kernel related...the rest of framework changes or tweaks that claim to do that are generally placebo at best
I have a somewhat related question. Does the black themed Gtalk in GC's rom make a difference in battery life? I really like it but I would like to try Humble's rom.
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA App
type_2 said:
I have a somewhat related question. Does the black themed Gtalk in GC's rom make a difference in battery life? I really like it but I would like to try Humble's rom.
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im not 100% sure but I doubt it matters all that much. Try it out for yourself and see if you like it. After all thats why we have choices right? Everyone likes something a bit different
I have not used GC, But I see no point as I love Humble. It is fantastic.
also doesnt humble use a significant amount of frameworks/apks from gc?
Yeah when i'm back I'll flash humble and see how it goes. I only ask about the black themed Gtalk because i use Gtalk a lot. But I'll let you guys know
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA App
nitsuj17 said:
also doesnt humble use a significant amount of frameworks/apks from gc?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty much it is imnuts' debloated rom with some GC frameworks/apks.
My observation so far after trying both on both froyo and gingerbread
For Froyo = I enjoyed Humble the best
For Gingerbread = I enjoyed Gummy the best
For now I am sticking with Gingerbread. Everything just feels faster.
nitroglycerine33 said:
Pretty much it is imnuts' debloated rom with some GC frameworks/apks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
eh...so it uses the good stuff from gc
So does gummy charged beat both?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
What is the best kernel for NS in terms of:
performance? (but drains battery faster)
Battery saving?
poging22 said:
What is the best kernel for NS in terms of:
performance? (but drains battery faster)
Battery saving?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no best kernel. All the threads asking receive the same answer, that is that it all comes down to personal preference. Try them all and see what you like best.
063_XOBX said:
There is no best kernel. All the threads asking receive the same answer, that is that it all comes down to personal preference. Try them all and see what you like best.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yow dude! so based on your experience, which kernel do you prefer?
I tried Trinity, drains my battery faster than usual.
I've been using Matr1x, but some people have had issues. That's why I really can't recommend anything other than that you try a few and see what works best for you.
No issues with Matr1x dude...
Op, what rom u on?
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
mathkid95 said:
No issues with Matr1x dude...
Op, what rom u on?
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't say there were anything wrong with the kernel (I wouldn't use it myself if that were my belief) , I simply stated the fact that some people have run into some issues (S.O.D., etc.).
what's SOD?
qtwrk said:
what's SOD?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sleep of Death, phone goes into sleep mode and freezes. Raising the Voltages helps.
I have tried every kernel out there & have had trouble in some form with all of them, except for the Glados Kernel. Rock solid stable, & a nice balance of performance / battery life. Using NStools allows you to get the most out of the kernel. I use it with live OC set at 105, & the lazy governer. This is what works well for me, it may differ for your phone.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Yes kernels run differently on different phones
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
poging22 said:
What is the best kernel for NS in terms of:
performance? (but drains battery faster)
Battery saving?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats a adventure you have to take alone
in all seriousness you gotta try out Trinity =]
Check out the kernels in this thread:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1283031
The nice thing about it is the availability of the 1320MHz frequency (if needed), yet you can run an undervolted setting most of the time and enjoy great battery life.
Most other kernels seem to be either fast or good on battery, here you get both in one package. Give it a test drive!
irizwan said:
Thats a adventure you have to take alone
in all seriousness you gotta try out Trinity =]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using Trinity now with 1.54 OC. It's snappy but drains battery fast.
A millionth time I've seen such a thread, and a millionth time I say the same - "Its your own personal choice..."
Not angry or such but just trying to make a joke...
I'm pretty much happy with the Matr1x Kernel, Netarchy dies on me, GLaDos is pretty good too, Trinity dies on me too...
by the way, MIUI has its own kernel? When you flash MIUI, what kernel do you get in default?
how about CM7?
What's the difference between Cfs and Bfs?
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Yeah can someone answer? What's the difference?
read this..
http://www.cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/data/bfs-v-cfs_groves-knockel-schulte.pdf
poging22 said:
by the way, MIUI has its own kernel? When you flash MIUI, what kernel do you get in default?
how about CM7?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
depends on what version of MIUI you flash
poging22 said:
I'm using Trinity now with 1.54 OC. It's snappy but drains battery fast.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whys it all the way up :O i mean OC'd just install TUV and use LiveOC 110 =/
It'll just OC it to about 1110 Mhz + 10% clock increase of the GPU
Is there a kernel that will play good with Hellfire Sandwich 1.7 (dirty) and that can be overclocked?
Sent from my Hell Bound Thumbs
Milton515 said:
Is there a kernel that will play good with Hellfire Sandwich 1.7 (dirty) and that can be overclocked?
Sent from my Hell Bound Thumbs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm running the latest harsh OC kernel with no problems.. And there's a new faux kernel 050 b1 that's out, I haven't tried it yet tho so can't say how it is..
Milton515 said:
Is there a kernel that will play good with Hellfire Sandwich 1.7 (dirty) and that can be overclocked?
Sent from my Hell Bound Thumbs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody can tell you which Kernel will work best for whatever ROM you wish to use it for because even though we have the 'same' phone, they are not all equally built. What may work with amazing battery life and performance to one person, might be terribly sluggish with terrible battery life for the next person. The only real way to tell which ROM+Kernel combo works best for your phone is to try every Kernel you think your phone 'likes'. Whether we all want to admit it or not, that is probably the best way.
Hope this helped, Good luck!
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
Are there any kernels that work with CM7.2 RC1 that both allow for OC/(UV) and don't completely break the accellerometer?
I have tried Trinity and Faux. I would really like to get back to ridiculous battery life from this extended battery pack.
thesheep said:
Are there any kernels that work with CM7.2 RC1 that both allow for OC/(UV) and don't completely break the accellerometer?
I have tried Trinity and Faux. I would really like to get back to ridiculous battery life from this extended battery pack.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it that difficult to make a new thread? I'm using faux right now and my accelerometer is fine.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
Harsh's kernel....
Sent from my Handheld Portal Device
In my opinion, the best kernel for G2X is Trenity
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
Trinity Kernels
I recently installed the Trinity Kernel and I don't really feel like I see a difference in my phone. I feel like my battery has shown no improvement. I installed the ti5 one but maybe I'll try the ELP one instead to see if I get anything different. I'm really looking for longer battery life. I used the phone theses days for about 30min of music a day (subway ride) and browsing here and there. Turned all syncing and app notifications off.
Check out the attached photos. I've seen screenshots of people with bar graphs showing their device at the top way ahead of everyone else.
IMO updated his TouchWiz kernel yesterday. Up until today I was using Scott's CleanKernel. Both are amazing kernels in my eyes. Both kernels are undervolted and overclocked. I had no issues with CleanKernel at all. I always seems to have bad battery life on the leanKernel until I flashed the updated .4 version this morning. Battery life seems much better compared to any leanKernel before the update. When running CleanKernel, I got a quadrant score of 4980. With leanKernel 0.4 I got 5160, both at stock 1.5GHz. I just want to see if others have noticed what I have between these two kernels.
You forgot that both are released in the Development section. A place where this thread does NOT belong...
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
how do i move or delete it?
vx2ko said:
how do i move or delete it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A mod will move it in when they get a chance.
Just so you know in the future,
if your not a developer its always safe to open up new threads in the Q and A section. (At least that's my rule for myself.. it saves you from the "I'm having a bad day so I will take it out on this guy" post)
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
drbveb88 said:
A mod will move it in when they get a chance.
Just so you know in the future,
if your not a developer its always safe to open up new threads in the Q and A section. (At least that's my rule for myself.. it saves you from the "I'm having a bad day so I will take it out on this guy" post)
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
XDA needs more people like you. Great reply and it made sense.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
This was handled nicely, thanks guys!
In the future OP pay attention to where you post and
read forum rules and stickies before posting
Thread Moved
FNM
Now that this has been moved can we get back on topic? What is yalls experience with these two kernels?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
personally i like leankernal because of how light and simple it is. no unneccesary weight and battery life is great.
Clean kernel is closer to stock than imos kernel which is kinda good and bad. The more you modify the kernel the more chance you'll have of breaking something but you also have the posabilty of making it way better if done right and everything comes out ok.
I would expect clean kernel to be more stable, less battery efficient, and a little slower overall. Where imos kernel could vary drastically with each update due to more major things being edited or changed. Right now imos beta. 4 has pretty good battery life over stock and is stable.
Personally I try the more modified stuff first and if I don't feel it pays off I move to something more stable or closer to stock until an update is released or problem addressed. Just my. 02
Sent from my Galaxy S III
vx2ko said:
Now that this has been moved can we get back on topic? What is yalls experience with these two kernels?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Clean Kernel is under volt by default for a given frequency. That is why the battery life is better. If you are looking for both performance and battery life, you should over clock Clean Kernel frequency to 1.89 (default is 1.5) max and min should be 400 range. GPU in Clean Kernel is also over clocked. "stable" is the key word to differentiate between the two. I would think that Clean Kernel is the most stable kernel of all. For speed they should be the same, for bells and whistles, Lean kernel would be your choice. To sum up, Clean Kernel give you both world, stable, performance and battery life... unless you want something else beside those 3.
Clienterror said:
Clean kernel is closer to stock than imos kernel which is kinda good and bad. The more you modify the kernel the more chance you'll have of breaking something but you also have the posabilty of making it way better if done right and everything comes out ok.
I would expect clean kernel to be more stable, less battery efficient, and a little slower overall. Where imos kernel could vary drastically with each update due to more major things being edited or changed. Right now imos beta. 4 has pretty good battery life over stock and is stable.
Personally I try the more modified stuff first and if I don't feel it pays off I move to something more stable or closer to stock until an update is released or problem addressed. Just my. 02
Sent from my Galaxy S III
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you on the kernel changing concept. And I have also noticed that .4 is much better than .3
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
buhohitr said:
Clean Kernel is under volt by default for a given frequency. That is why the battery life is better. If you are looking for both performance and battery life, you should over clock Clean Kernel frequency to 1.89 (default is 1.5) max and min should be 400 range. GPU in Clean Kernel is also over clocked. "stable" is the key word to differentiate between the two. I would think that Clean Kernel is the most stable kernel of all. For speed they should be the same, for bells and whistles, Lean kernel would be your choice. To sum up, Clean Kernel give you both world, stable, performance and battery life... unless you want something else beside those 3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you're a cleankernel guy? I definitely agree with you about this being all three things. So as far as the GPU being overclocked, why does lean kernel .4 perform better in games
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
vx2ko said:
So you're a cleankernel guy? I definitely agree with you about this being all three things. So as far as the GPU being overclocked, why does lean kernel .4 perform better in games
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like I have mentioned, if you aiming for gaming performance then you better to use lean, but then your battery life wouldn't be too good. Most of people just want a fast stable phone and a good battery life for daily use, then Clean will be a better choice. The reason it's stable because no tweaks to it except for OC/UV. Have you tried to play game with Clean over clocked to 1.89?
buhohitr said:
Like I have mentioned, if you aiming for gaming performance then you better to use lean, but then your battery life wouldn't be too good. Most of people just want a fast stable phone and a good battery life for daily use, then Clean will be a better choice. The reason it's stable because no tweaks to it except for OC/UV. Have you tried to play game with Clean over clocked to 1.89?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I never thought of overclocking and playing the game until now. I guess Im just used to being at stock. But I will give it a try and see how that works. But what your saying definitely makes sense and should clear some things up. Performace + battery life = cleankernel. PERFORMANCE + PERFORMANCE = leankernel. Although the battery life on leankernel has dramatically been improved.
vx2ko said:
Actually I never thought of overclocking and playing the game until now. I guess Im just used to being at stock. But I will give it a try and see how that works. But what your saying definitely makes sense and should clear some things up. Performace + battery life = cleankernel. PERFORMANCE + PERFORMANCE = leankernel. Although the battery life on leankernel has dramatically been improved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha.. you got it...almost.. Performance+battery life+stable=Clean. Super perfornance -less battery life - 10% stable=Lean kernel. Good luck bro.
ok I just setup an app profile in setcpu. so now everytime im in my game, its overclocked. When im using it normally, its at stock speed. With the screen off, its at min 190 and max 452. so far so good!
.5 is up now with more fixes.
http://rootzwiki.com/index.php?/topic/31329-[kernel][touchwiz]-Leankernel:-Minimalistic-Kernel-(8/28---v0.5)
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Thanks for the heads up! More battery drain fixes. Although it says in order to revert back to stock we have to flash a ROM with a kernel. Would a nan backup work? Anyone tests the kernel yet