I bought a Moto G when it had gotten really popular I thought development would be great on it. Its been anything but great.
Is Motorola the reason for it? Like are they not providing all the tools that the devs need? Or there are simply not enough good devs working on the phone?
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
Motorola is providing optimized software which is more than enough for most of users and devs...
Also you have official supports for some famous roms..
If development means porting touchwiz and sense themed roms then sorry.. You might never see that happening..
Poor? We have FAUX KERNEL! Also we have many good devs working for ROMs like Quarx and many more..
But yeah, stock roms is very good, so not everyone want custom rom
Buy some cheap chinese phone, then you know what is poor developement..
eddydc1 said:
Poor? We have FAUX KERNEL! Also we have many good devs working for ROMs like Quarx and many more..
But yeah, stock roms is very good, so not everyone want custom rom
Buy some cheap chinese phone, then you know what is poor developement..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no stable CM, most custom ROMs have terrible audio quality. I came from the Nexus S so my frame of comparison is not a Chinese phone.
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
Gambler_3 said:
There is no stable CM, most custom ROMs have terrible audio quality. I came from the Nexus S so my frame of comparison is not a Chinese phone.
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quarx CM11 is stable if you ask me. And about audio quality, i never had such problems ( i use V4A though )
crDroid should be stable enough. Just notice that bugs with xposed are not supported
eddydc1 said:
Quarx CM11 is stable if you ask me. And about audio quality, i never had such problems ( i use V4A though )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ya using an audio mod is a different thing, out of the box most roms have significantly worse audio than stock rom and devs just don't seem to give a damn about that.
Officially CM is still stuck at M6.
Gambler_3 said:
Ya using an audio mod is a different thing, out of the box most roms have significantly worse audio than stock rom and devs just don't seem to give a damn about that.
Officially CM is still stuck at M6.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I found that in my case custom ROMs have a much better audio quality than stock, but that's just my experience.
Gambler_3 said:
I bought a Moto G when it had gotten really popular I thought development would be great on it. Its been anything but great.
Is Motorola the reason for it? Like are they not providing all the tools that the devs need? Or there are simply not enough good devs working on the phone?
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Poor development? There is almost every ROM available for the Moto G. Officially or Unofficially. I was looking for a ROM to build, but after going through countless forums, I still couldn't find much that isn't already there for the Moto G. The developers are active too. What more could you ask for?
Sent from my Moto G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
eddydc1 said:
Poor? We have FAUX KERNEL! Also we have many good devs working for ROMs like Quarx and many more..
But yeah, stock roms is very good, so not everyone want custom rom
Buy some cheap chinese phone, then you know what is poor developement..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Having a ROM and having a good ROM are 2 different things. I have used CM which was never stable and I have used Gummy ROM which had poor audio. I made a thread asking for a stable ROM with stock like audio and people said there is no such thing. Is that not enough?
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
Gambler_3 said:
Having a ROM and having a good ROM are 2 different things. I have used CM which was never stable and I have used Gummy ROM which had poor audio. I made a thread asking for a stable ROM with stock like audio and people said there is no such thing. Is that not enough?
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hava look at liquidsmooth
Gambler_3 said:
Having a ROM and having a good ROM are 2 different things. I have used CM which was never stable and I have used Gummy ROM which had poor audio. I made a thread asking for a stable ROM with stock like audio and people said there is no such thing. Is that not enough?
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are that much of an audiophile why did you choose a mid-level phone?
Viper4android is a valid tool
hhp_211 said:
If you are that much of an audiophile why did you choose a mid-level phone?
Viper4android is a valid tool
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This comment made me chuckle.
Audiophile...whoo!! :laugh:
rudi_j7 said:
Poor development? There is almost every ROM available for the Moto G. Officially or Unofficially. I was looking for a ROM to build, but after going through countless forums, I still couldn't find much that isn't already there for the Moto G. The developers are active too. What more could you ask for?
Sent from my Moto G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2nd gen Moto G could use your help. If you could port it over that is
hhp_211 said:
If you are that much of an audiophile why did you choose a mid-level phone?
Viper4android is a valid tool
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who said anything about being an audiophile? Expecting custom roms to have at least as good sound quality as the stock out of the box experience is not being an audiophile.
Mind you the Moto G has one of the best audio quality of 2013 phones. It's better than a lot of flagships.
Syhota said:
2nd gen Moto G could use your help. If you could port it over that is
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm running out of time these days.. Let's see.
Sent from my Moto G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Gambler_3 said:
Who said anything about being an audiophile? Expecting custom roms to have at least as good sound quality as the stock out of the box experience is not being an audiophile.
Mind you the Moto G has one of the best audio quality of 2013 phones. It's better than a lot of flagships.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What audio problems do you have? I've never had any
---------- Post added at 11:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:34 PM ----------
Or if you don't like the ROMs, just go back to stock.
rudi_j7 said:
I'm running out of time these days.. Let's see.
Sent from my Moto G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any sort of development done would be helpful right now. All we have is a root guide and a sometimes working/sometimes not TWRP recovery
vhngu930 said:
What audio problems do you have? I've never had any
---------- Post added at 11:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:34 PM ----------
Or if you don't like the ROMs, just go back to stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Low volume in custom ROMs. Yes I am running stock ROM now.
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
hhp_211 said:
If you are that much of an audiophile why did you choose a mid-level phone?
Viper4android is a valid tool
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well audio is notably lower in loudness when compared to stock. Short to say, its degraded from stock rom. It's not a matter of low end mid end high end phone.
Related
Here we can talk about anything you want thats based on mint jelly or nottachs exposed app.We can discuss settings,batteries,kernels,we can argue,make friends,make enemies,whatever just PLEASE HAVE FUN
I'm a huge fan of KT kernel and currently have it on my S3 with CM ROM. Monday my new S4 arrives and I'm thinking of sticking with semi stock Rom. mint came up on the list if highly regarded and compatible (even packaged with KT)
Two q for you
1. Do all the Sammy features work in mint like dual camera and that ir remote etc...
2. Any chance you can share your settings file for KT and give an idea how is your battery life and performance with min/KT... Of course I know battery life is not the same for everyone so just wondering about your experience.
Thanks dude.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
gravedigger76 said:
I'm a huge fan of KT kernel and currently have it on my S3 with CM ROM. Monday my new S4 arrives and I'm thinking of sticking with semi stock Rom. mint came up on the list if highly regarded and compatible (even packaged with KT)
Two q for you
1. Do all the Sammy features work in mint like dual camera and that ir remote etc...
2. Any chance you can share your settings file for KT and give an idea how is your battery life and performance with min/KT... Of course I know battery life is not the same for everyone so just wondering about your experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. All the Samsung features are left intact and working for me. It's the awesome camera app that's making it tough for me to go AOSP. He removed the AT&T bloat only.
2. I'm running KT's settings in post three of his thread for the kernel. I'm not seeing anymore lag issues and battery has improved over stock. I'm very happy with it.
i'm also running kt kernel and his recommended settings and it's been amazing so far. Also love the trinity colors set to cold (more blues).
vintagepimpage said:
1. All the Samsung features are left intact and working for me. It's the awesome camera app that's making it tough for me to go AOSP. He removed the AT&T bloat only.
2. I'm running KT's settings in post three of his thread for the kernel. I'm not seeing anymore lag issues and battery has improved over stock. I'm very happy with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice. Is the ROM auto-loki or have to rely on the kernel to do that?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
wow im trying out that fox hound rom,wow,someone just told me about it a few hours ago
gravedigger76 said:
Nice. Is the ROM auto-loki or have to rely on the kernel to do that?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mint is autop loki,but if you use the OUDHS cwm recovery it auto lokis everything roms kernels whatever and if they are already it knows and leaves them be
djmouse said:
mint is autop loki,but if you use the OUDHS cwm recovery it auto lokis everything roms kernels whatever and if they are already it knows and leaves them be
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Twr doesn't yet?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
---------- Post added at 06:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:56 PM ----------
djmouse said:
wow im trying out that fox hound rom,wow,someone just told me about it a few hours ago
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are the + over stock and over Mint?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
gravedigger76 said:
Twr doesn't yet?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
---------- Post added at 06:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:56 PM ----------
What are the + over stock and over Mint?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
deoxed,nottachs app built in,no att apps,MEA build,kts kernel,and much more,u can run wallet on it also, and twrp is suppsosed to if it does im not actually sure i gave up on twrp had to many issues with it,ohh the differences between mint and fox hound is it themed and theres a bunch of other stuff in it,im still setting up
gravedigger76 said:
I'm a huge fan of KT kernel and currently have it on my S3 with CM ROM. Monday my new S4 arrives and I'm thinking of sticking with semi stock Rom. mint came up on the list if highly regarded and compatible (even packaged with KT)
Two q for you
1. Do all the Sammy features work in mint like dual camera and that ir remote etc...
2. Any chance you can share your settings file for KT and give an idea how is your battery life and performance with min/KT... Of course I know battery life is not the same for everyone so just wondering about your experience.
Thanks dude.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and they all work ,yes the dual cam works ,and i use kts perferred setting minus the voltage drops
djmouse said:
deoxed,nottachs app built in,no att apps,MEA build,kts kernel,and much more,u can run wallet on it also, and twrp is suppsosed to if it does im not actually sure i gave up on twrp had to many issues with it,ohh the differences between mint and fox hound is it themed and theres a bunch of other stuff in it,im still setting up
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
where did you find the link for it? I'm not seeing it in AT&T S4 Android Dev threads...
gravedigger76 said:
where did you find the link for it? I'm not seeing it in AT&T S4 Android Dev threads...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its not in att thread its in the GT-I9505 thread if you just type fox hound in the search bar youll find it.if you flash an att kernel like kts it will work
heres some screen shot of the fox hound rom with black bacckrounds and a few other things,and showing nottachs app still works
funny i made this thread to talk about mint jelly and i switched roms right after
one of the lock screen
djmouse said:
funny i made this thread to talk about mint jelly and i switched roms right after
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
life of a flashaholic
s1l3nt said:
life of a flashaholic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha i actually havent ran anything else but mint jelly yet on this phone till last night believe it or not
djmouse said:
haha i actually havent ran anything else but mint jelly yet on this phone till last night believe it or not
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I might give fox hound another try. Latest update is based on the latest MF4 but nottach xposed does not work for MF4 yet.
s1l3nt said:
I might give fox hound another try. Latest update is based on the latest MF4 but nottach xposed does not work for MF4 yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ohh yea i forgot about that, but i dont know that rom has xposed built in and it was made around nottachs app working so it might,they just updated it today to MF4 and i saw somewhere that someone had it working ona MF4 build i think,you cant even dl the newest build right now so slow there tring to get mirrors up
I may give foxhound a try. I tested jedi and haven't gone back to mint jelly after applying kt's kernel and switching the contacts apk with the one in mint jelly. Jedi is really snappy and I am also running nottach's xposed mod.
Sent from my SGH-I337 using xda premium
I'm just wondering if there is another phone build that is compatible with the XT897 (i.e. there aren't very many available ROMS for this phone so could I try to install a ROM for lets say the RAZR build on the Photon?
What ROM were you looking for?
If it's built from source, rebuilding it for the Q would be a better idea, and really not that difficult.
I think we've got plenty of ROMs. CM10.2,Liquid Smooth,PacMan and Carbon. I'm still waiting for Liquid Smooth 3x.
Sent from my MZ601 using Tapatalk 4
There is a family of MSM8960 phones (Photon Q, Razr M, Razr HD, Atrix HD). If a ROM port exists for one of them, it will be easy to port, but has to be slightly reconfigured. In short, you cannot flash other phones ROM directly.
arrrghhh said:
What ROM were you looking for?
If it's built from source, rebuilding it for the Q would be a better idea, and really not that difficult.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right now I'm running cm10.2(nightly) on 4.3 os and I love it! I just like taking different ROM's and playing with them. The phone that i had before this one was the Nexus S 4g which was probably one of the most amazing phones I've ever had and I miss it dearly(got water-damaged) because of the fact it was compatible with almost any ROM I found. Even had GS3 stuff running on it at one point. SlimRom was my favorite but I have been wanting to try out paranoidAndroid and the like but wasn't sure if it was compatible with the photon Q. I do like Carbon as well.
Skrilax_CZ said:
There is a family of MSM8960 phones (Photon Q, Razr M, Razr HD, Atrix HD). If a ROM port exists for one of them, it will be easy to port, but has to be slightly reconfigured. In short, you cannot flash other phones ROM directly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So would you just change up stuff in the build.prop to make it work?
huatz84 said:
I think we've got plenty of ROMs. CM10.2,Liquid Smooth,PacMan and Carbon. I'm still waiting for Liquid Smooth 3x.
Sent from my MZ601 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey don't get me wrong....Carbon is an awesome rom and Liquid Smooth has a lot of potential. I haven't tried PacMan yet though.
b3bluesman said:
So would you just change up stuff in the build.prop to make it work?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's a few tweaks the Q needs. Again, if you have a ROM you want that there is source available for - it can probably be rebuilt for the Q from source.
arrrghhh said:
What ROM were you looking for?
If it's built from source, rebuilding it for the Q would be a better idea, and really not that difficult.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yeah I am looking for a good stable ROM with photosphere and able to overclock my cpu to 1.7 or higher.
b3bluesman said:
Oh yeah I am looking for a good stable ROM with photosphere and able to overclock my cpu to 1.7 or higher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclock is a kernel thing. You can do that on any ROM.
I just Googled Photosphere (had no idea what it was ) and it says a 4.2 feature? Most of the 4.2 ROM's should have it, I would think the 4.3 ones would as well, although they are maturing obviously.
b3bluesman said:
Hey don't get me wrong....Carbon is an awesome rom and Liquid Smooth has a lot of potential. I haven't tried PacMan yet though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should try it on your Q..
All is awesome I think. It's only personal taste.
Sent from my XT897 using Tapatalk 2
huatz84 said:
You should try it on your Q..
All is awesome I think. It's only personal taste.
Sent from my XT897 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah for sure I'll definitely give it a go! Thanks for that!
arrrghhh said:
Overclock is a kernel thing. You can do that on any ROM.
I just Googled Photosphere (had no idea what it was ) and it says a 4.2 feature? Most of the 4.2 ROM's should have it, I would think the 4.3 ones would as well, although they are maturing obviously.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man I just heard about Android 4.4 KitKat on the news. I just barely got 4.3 about a month ago. What's up with that?
That's right, The boot animation will be an ad for Nestlé. Ads everywhere nowadays.
Skrilax_CZ said:
That's right, The boot animation will be an ad for Nestlé. Ads everywhere nowadays.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I was thinking... I guess even the name of Android is for sale.
It is Google after all! So who's making bets on Android 5.0? Lucky Charms?
arrrghhh said:
That's what I was thinking... I guess even the name of Android is for sale.
It is Google after all! So who's making bets on Android 5.0? Lucky Charms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was just talking to some friends of mine today about Google back in the '90s making their first million from selling ad space.....I remember that like it was yesterday. Then Yahoo comes along and so begins the Battle of the Search Engines on the Nasdaq.
b3bluesman said:
Yeah for sure I'll definitely give it a go! Thanks for that!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just flashed Pacman rom for the Q....I really like it. Dont know why I havent tried this one before.
Not sure which section this would go in so sorry if it's the wrong one.
Loving the M8 to death probably the best phone I've ever owned other than my gnex but would love to see some AOSP roms. Don't really care for sense and would love more of a lightweight Rom like AOSP. I feel we would get better performance as far as speed and battery life as well.
So is anyone working on one? Or need any testers?
Do you think an AOSP Rom would be perfect for the M8?
The ROM section(s)? GPE edition comes out in 4 days, I'm sure there will be some ports relatively quickly after that.
There is a GPE port and CM11. They aren't perfect yet but you can run them. Aren't too hard to find if you look around.
Sent from my HTC6525LVW using XDA Free mobile app
brandogg said:
The ROM section(s)? GPE edition comes out in 4 days, I'm sure there will be some ports relatively quickly after that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eh?
Sent from my HTC6525LVW using XDA Premium HD app
Well I can't post in the Rom section and the way it sits gpe isn't a daily driver nor has it been updated since the first alpha release. Not a fan of cm but good to hear it's coming. Just tired of sense holding this phone back.
The GPE port works okay other than some lag and the camera is annoying but works. They were saying to look in those sections not post there. Once CM11 is working I'm sure we'll see more but for now those are the options.
Sent from my HTC6525LVW using XDA Free mobile app
Keithn said:
The GPE port works okay other than some lag and the camera is annoying but works. They were saying to look in those sections not post there. Once CM11 is working I'm sure we'll see more but for now those are the options.
Sent from my HTC6525LVW using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not consider CM to be asop. GPE yes, which I hope gets updated to fix the camera and what not because I can't use a Rom with a non stable camera. And I've already checked the Rom section or I wouldn't 've posting asking just saying. I'll just sit back and wait for something which I'm sure is coming sooner than later. I may end up
Brewing an asop Rom myself. Thanks for the input though guys!
To be clear - when I say GPE, I'm referring to the actual phone (One M8 Google Play Edition, ships on the 9th), not the ROM posted in the Android development forum.
Also, I literally just picked up this phone about an hour ago, and while I'm a huge fan of "stock," HTC has done an incredible job with this release.
brandogg said:
To be clear - when I say GPE, I'm referring to the actual phone (One M8 Google Play Edition, ships on the 9th), not the ROM posted in the Android development forum.
Also, I literally just picked up this phone about an hour ago, and while I'm a huge fan of "stock," HTC has done an incredible job with this release.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I definitely agree HTC stepped their game up with sense 6 and keeping it's bloatware to the minimum. That being said I still prefer straight stock asop for its speed and battery not to mention I hate clutter. Also congrats on the new m8 which I'm sure you'll love. I love mine too that's why I didn't wait for the gpe device.
Keithn said:
Once CM11 is working I'm sure we'll see more but for now those are the options.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM11 is working to perfection for me, it's my daily driver as of around noon today! <G>
CM11 is smooth and its only a prebuild out right now .. im loving it .. almost everything works .. its not perfect but its really really good
ANTHONY81L said:
CM11 is smooth and its only a prebuild out right now .. im loving it .. almost everything works .. its not perfect but its really really good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's actually beautiful. What's working and what's not? Also where did you get it from? It's not in our Rom section.
ANTHONY81L said:
CM11 is smooth and its only a prebuild out right now .. im loving it .. almost everything works .. its not perfect but its really really good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I man where did you get that
Sent from my HTC6525LVW using XDA Premium HD app
shawnten said:
I man where did you get that
Sent from my HTC6525LVW using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=52421819
Sent from my One M8 using Tapatalk
ruccarucca said:
That's actually beautiful. What's working and what's not? Also where did you get it from? It's not in our Rom section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
shawnten said:
I man where did you get that
Sent from my HTC6525LVW using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://d-h.st/5Xs <-- from the dev himself but this version doesnt flash with twrp unless you know how to remove the asserts from the updater script .. i flashed this with Philz cwm recovery in the original dev section
https://mega.co.nz/#!8VEUDACD!n5nfBQYRnFymOup9NUxaAr0p7ZzrFvyf6jtX6wVMEDI <--- this version is what someone else posted .. said its the same rom just with the asserts already removed so that it works with twrp without having to do anything special
REMEMBER go download KK Gapps ... i recommend the stock normal Gapps .. i tried PA Gapps first and it kinda wasnt running right
themes i used were a combo of Moonshine (playstore free) and Black moonshine (playstore paid) both are gorgeous icon sets ... MAKE A BACKUP BEFORE YOU FLASH THIS GUYS !!!!
CM11, LiquidSmooth & OSE are all available for the HTC One M8
krazie1 said:
CM11, LiquidSmooth & OSE are all available for the HTC One M8
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Link for ose ? I know I heard liquid still had quite a few more bugs than cn11
ANTHONY81L said:
Link for ose ? I know I heard liquid still had quite a few more bugs than cn11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.drdevs.com/devs/teamose/OSE/Nightlies/
OSE hasn't been updated since April so don't know what issues it has. Liquidsmooth 05/06 Nightly can be flashed via TWRP now but has these following bugs:
*No In call audio (they can't hear you & you can't hear them)
*Headphone jack still broken
*FFC is broken
*Low Resolution MMS Quality
CM11 5/6 nightly...
Works:
Installs on TWRP now, headphone works (using it now), camera works. Wifi works. Regular calls through the phone itself work.
Doesn't work:
Speakerphone still doesn't work.
Untested by me:
Bluetooth. MMS.
Looking better all the time.
Jason
JasonJoel said:
CM11 5/6 nightly...
Works:
Installs on TWRP now, headphone works (using it now), camera works. Wifi works. Regular calls through the phone itself work.
Doesn't work:
Speakerphone still doesn't work.
Untested by me:
Bluetooth. MMS.
Looking better all the time.
Jason
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you link me, please?
So... I'm planning to switch to Nexus 5 because my current phone (xperia zl) is lost...
Can you guys suggest me a good custom rom? I mean lag-free (no lag when you pull down the notification drawer), and stable ?
Thanks a lot, sorry if i'm asking such as unimportant question, i'm new in here
Since AOSP is built for Nexus range, they're all about as lag free as each other and all pretty stable.
Just look for the features you want and try the roms...
Android L
Sent from my Android L Nexus 5 via Tapatalk
rootSU said:
Since AOSP is built for Nexus range, they're all about as lag free as each other and all pretty stable.
Just look for the features you want and try the roms...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But i've read on some website said that PA, Carbon, and Mahdi is laging.. .Is that true?
If they are, its users poor setup or certain apps. ?
Stock is noticeably faster than pacman cm based ROM no matter what my settings were.
Going to try a couple more aosp based Roms like rastakat for the missing features from stock.
Will definitely be sticking to aosp Roms now though and not bother with any cm based.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Free mobile app
---------- Post added at 03:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:16 AM ----------
Also pa was definitely faster than pacman but since I didn't run it back to back against stock ROM I can't say if it was slower or faster.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Free mobile app
Also pa was definitely faster than pacman but since I didn't run it back to back against stock ROM I can't say if it was slower or faster.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Free mobile app
Zero lag with mahdi
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Free mobile app
Liquidsmooth
best rom threads arent allowed but if u go for stability go for cm
bhavstech said:
best rom threads arent allowed but if u go for stability go for cm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes they are now.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
bhavstech said:
best rom threads arent allowed but if u go for stability go for cm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cm is not known for stability, lol.
simms22 said:
cm is not known for stability, lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
when i was on galaxy s2 of of all roms i had tried cm had the least bugs and cm11 for galaxy s2 was fit for daily use since 3rd build i guess it would be same for all phone !
its written on cm site too that people find cm more stable than other roms. may i know the reason for your opinion?
bhavstech said:
its written on cm site too that people find cm more stable than other roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unbiased that is.
bhavstech said:
when i was on galaxy s2 of of all roms i had tried cm had the least bugs and cm11 for galaxy s2 was fit for daily use since 3rd build i guess it would be same for all phone !
its written on cm site too that people find cm more stable than other roms. may i know the reason for your opinion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm has always been a battery drain for me since cm6. Its never been more stable than anything else. Maybe their final versions are as stable as everything else, but all their nightlies and everything else released between the final versions always seem to introduce bugs. And they always change stuff that doesn't need changing.
I will never use cm again. Simply awful.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
bhavstech said:
when i was on galaxy s2 of of all roms i had tried cm had the least bugs and cm11 for galaxy s2 was fit for daily use since 3rd build i guess it would be same for all phone !
its written on cm site too that people find cm more stable than other roms. may i know the reason for your opinion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
read the xda threads on xda in general, q&a. many many times its cm thats unstable. besides, i spent years on cm, i know what it can be like. anyways, for the nexus 5, there are many roms that id consider more stable than cm.
First time trying a cm based ROM on my n5 and first time I have stability issues. Had to hard reboot cause it wouldn't wake up at all.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Free mobile app
rootSU said:
Cm has always been a battery drain for me since cm6. Its never been more stable than anything else. Maybe their final versions are as stable as everything else, but all their nightlies and everything else released between the final versions always seem to introduce bugs. And they always change stuff that doesn't need changing.
I will never use cm again. Simply awful.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so which rom do you suggest with all features of cm present and better than it
bhavstech said:
so which rom do you suggest with all features of cm present and better than it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't suggest roms and have no idea what features cm has
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
So.... I guess i'm gonna try em all lol
Anyway, just in case, what should i do if i get a bootloop?
I rooted my 6045O last night and I'm excited to try a ROM on this phone. I seen the big thread on the CyanogenMod 12.1 http://forum.xda-developers.com/ido...om-cyanogenmod-12-1-alcatel-onetouch-t3225533
But I wanna make sure it's the best ROM for this phone.
you cant read idol 3 section?
Wow thanks for being friendly to the new guy. As I stated, I seen the big thread on the CyanogenMod 12.1. Just wanted to make sure there wasn't a better ROM that you guys might know of before I put time into learning about that one.
Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk
rlugo29 said:
I rooted my 6045O last night and I'm excited to try a ROM on this phone. I seen the big thread on the CyanogenMod 12.1 http://forum.xda-developers.com/ido...om-cyanogenmod-12-1-alcatel-onetouch-t3225533
But I wanna make sure it's the best ROM for this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not for sure either.great work on all though.I'm leaning toward the dcz rom cause from my understanding its fast,smooth and I like stock style roms.
I didn't see a DCZ thread?
Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk
If you gonna flash a ROM know that besides dcz, only fully working ROM is cm12.1 also I'm using 60450
Ok so those are my options. Thanks. Do you know any pros/cons of one vs the other?
Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk
http://forum.xda-developers.com/idol-3/development/rom-6045-i806-dcz-stock-oc-kernel-root-t3257511
Link is invalid
Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk
rlugo29 said:
Ok so those are my options. Thanks. Do you know any pros/cons of one vs the other?
Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well do you want stock ROM with overclock kernel(DCZ) vs the beauty and customization of cyanogenmod?
All dcz rom is a almost fully debloated stock ROM and custom kernel made by team adrv.
903tex said:
Well do you want stock ROM with overclock kernel(DCZ) vs the beauty and customization of cyanogenmod?
All dcz rom is a almost fully debloated stock ROM and custom kernel made by team adrv.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If the stock rom did not have such lag I'd suggest the majority stick with it unless you had a specific reason not to. Since it DOES have lag, I'd suggest the i806/DCZ rom since it is a version of stock that should eliminate the lag and work fully with the hardware. All the other rom's have issues of one type or another.
Resurrection Remix still has several things wrong..the camera off the top of my head. CM12.1 still has issues. Currently the cm12.1 dev does not have the device in hand...neither does the resurrection remix dev....working on rom's without the device is similar to driving blindfolded. You are guaranteed to get SOMEWHERE but it may not be where you want to be.
There are only 3 real roms available other than original stock and I HIGHLY recommend you backup your stock with twrp so you can go back to it for system updates. Why are the system updates so important if you are on another rom? They are the only way you can get modem driver mods/improvements among other things.
I'm not sure which I'd prefer at the moment. Guess I'll just read lol
Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk
Cm 12.1 (10/29) is most stable on my idol 3 (6045i). Resurrection Remix is not stable. Random reboots, lag and speakers and cam don't work.
Sent from my 6045X using Tapatalk
Thanks for the tips. I do like performance and stability over anything. So I'll check out DCZ. I've already backed up stock.
Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk
famewolf said:
If the stock rom did not have such lag I'd suggest the majority stick with it unless you had a specific reason not to. Since it DOES have lag, I'd suggest the i806/DCZ rom since it is a version of stock that should eliminate the lag and work fully with the hardware. All the other rom's have issues of one type or another.
Resurrection Remix still has several things wrong..the camera off the top of my head. CM12.1 still has issues. Currently the cm12.1 dev does not have the device in hand...neither does the resurrection remix dev....working on rom's without the device is similar to driving blindfolded. You are guaranteed to get SOMEWHERE but it may not be where you want to be.
There are only 3 real roms available other than original stock and I HIGHLY recommend you backup your stock with twrp so you can go back to it for system updates. Why are the system updates so important if you are on another rom? They are the only way you can get modem driver mods/improvements among other things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you talking about me?
903tex said:
Are you talking about me?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you paranoid?
famewolf said:
Are you paranoid?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you?
Sorry, wrong thread.