Hi
I'm having trouble with all the roms I tried (except stock) on sgs4 (i9505) and my pebble watch. I tried aokp, cm, paranoid, carbon, omni and pack. They all have the problem and all have cyanogen in their kernel name. So I thought it might be a solution to try something that's not based on cm...
But what roms are there that are not based on cm?
Thanks in advance...
Atte
a773 said:
Hi
I'm having trouble with all the roms I tried (except stock) on sgs4 (i9505) and my pebble watch. I tried aokp, cm, paranoid, carbon, omni and pack. They all have the problem and all have cyanogen in their kernel name. So I thought it might be a solution to try something that's not based on cm...
But what roms are there that are not based on cm?
Thanks in advance...
Atte
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no
Ok, so it's either back to stock or wait for a fix in cm...
a773 said:
Hi
I'm having trouble with all the roms I tried (except stock) on sgs4 (i9505) and my pebble watch. I tried aokp, cm, paranoid, carbon, omni and pack. They all have the problem and all have cyanogen in their kernel name. So I thought it might be a solution to try something that's not based on cm...
But what roms are there that are not based on cm?
Thanks in advance...
Atte
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm based rom works fine ....do a full system wipe before flashing .it will solve ur problem
I did that, and mostly they work fine. However when using my pebble with a running app (runkeeper, pebble runner or runtastic) the display on the pebble lags, and eventually stops updating. Worked fine in Stock, broken in all the mentioned roms.
a773 said:
I did that, and mostly they work fine. However when using my pebble with a running app (runkeeper, pebble runner or runtastic) the display on the pebble lags, and eventually stops updating. Worked fine in Stock, broken in all the mentioned roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Update ur apps to latest..maybe a compatibility issue.
Apps are up to date...
Related
This was originally ported to the S2 but that doesnt mean we're different right (almost). It says I eed a deodexed rom which is basically any custom rom like ParanoidAndroid, or the Jedi Jelly. And it says you need a 180dpi which can be changed on ParanoidAndroid.
Can someone port this? I have tried flashing it on CWM as stated in the original thread, no errors, and nothing comes up or in the display settings...
Here is the link:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2006684
Thanks!!! :laugh: :good: :laugh: :good:
52me52 said:
This was originally ported to the S2 but that doesnt mean we're different right (almost). It says I eed a deodexed rom which is basically any custom rom like ParanoidAndroid, or the Jedi Jelly. And it says you need a 180dpi which can be changed on ParanoidAndroid.
Can someone port this? I have tried flashing it on CWM as stated in the original thread, no errors, and nothing comes up or in the display settings...
Here is the link:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2006684
Thanks!!! :laugh: :good: :laugh: :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is for TW based roms not AOSP/CM roms so it wont work on PA, also dont flash that zip as the i9100 has different system partitions so you can potentially brick your device by flashing it.
i was working on porting this but came to a hault, ive got almost everything working except when i try to add a second window the Flashbarservice force closes. i havent worked on it since then but may look into it again this weekend
gs2usr said:
this is for TW based roms not AOSP/CM roms so it wont work on PA, also dont flash that zip as the i9100 has different system partitions so you can potentially brick your device by flashing it.
i was working on porting this but came to a hault, ive got almost everything working except when i try to add a second window the Flashbarservice force closes. i havent worked on it since then but may look into it again this weekend
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Glad to see you're working on it! Thanks
Would it be possible to port this over to aosp based roms, or would we have to use the jelly bean leak?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app
blweldon2 said:
Would it be possible to port this over to aosp based roms, or would we have to use the jelly bean leak?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
gs2usr stated that it does not work on AOSP roms, he might work on it this weekend, below:
this is for TW based roms not AOSP/CM roms so it wont work on PA, also dont flash that zip as the i9100 has different system partitions so you can potentially brick your device by flashing it.
i was working on porting this but came to a hault, ive got almost everything working except when i try to add a second window the Flashbarservice force closes. i havent worked on it since then but may look into it again this weekend
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe this could help ???
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2024227
Mohan will have this feature in embryo 6.0. You guys need to give him more credit. It's shouldn't be Seanz or g2user ALL the time.
Any Dev is porting this?
manu44 said:
Any Dev is porting this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look right above your post....
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
manu44 said:
Any Dev is porting this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Y u no read?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2
Does anybody know whether or not wireless tether works on this rom (rc1)? Thank you in advance
PureLife90 said:
Does anybody know whether or not wireless tether works on this rom (rc1)? Thank you in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i hope youre talking about 10.1?
and i dont know about slimbean, but i think that only open security tethering works on other 10.1 ROMS.
if thats a deal breaker i think i saw a post that said it was fixed in CM so the newest nightly might be of interest to you.
ddurandSGS3 said:
i hope youre talking about 10.1?
and i dont know about slimbean, but i think that only open security tethering works on other 10.1 ROMS.
if thats a deal breaker i think i saw a post that said it was fixed in CM so the newest nightly might be of interest to you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Slimbean isn't a CM ROM. It is a slim down AOSP ROM. There are only the official cm, unofficial cm roms and the hybrid ROMs with cm with paranoid android and AOKP mixed in.
jmxc23 said:
Slimbean isn't a CM ROM. It is a slim down AOSP ROM. There are only the official cm, unofficial cm roms and the hybrid ROMs with cm with paranoid android and AOKP mixed in.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
youre right, i lump this whole forum into that category sometimes by accident.
my bad.
Hi there mates,
I finally decided to dump the stock ROM and give it a try on custom one.
After reading a bit i think i'm starting to like Cyanogen, but since i want a good stable ROM i appreciated some opinions form anyone who is using it.
1st and really important: my stock ROM does not have any of the know issues (deep sleep probs, random reboots, battery drains etc...) so anyone know if CM 9.x stable have any of this issues?
2nd does everything work? In the CM forums i found no one complaining with "loosing" functionality's but i would like to ear from anyone that uses this on a daily basis. (i found a lot of people complaining with encryption problem and bad flashing but not about Wifi radio, camera, etc...)
3rd: Is this the best choice to use on a daily basis? Or there is a better/more stable/more fluid Rom?
Thanks to all.
Most of the CM 10.x ROMs are pretty stable and usable. I am a fan of the KatKiss ROMs. 4.2.2 has the best functionality, but the 4.3 variant is not bad. The only thng that does not work for me is camera on Skype.
+1 for KatKiss #226
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2362764
frederuco said:
Most of the CM 10.x ROMs are pretty stable and usable. I am a fan of the KatKiss ROMs. 4.2.2 has the best functionality, but the 4.3 variant is not bad. The only thng that does not work for me is camera on Skype.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thks for the info but now im confused...
You mentioned that Skype cant use the front cam. Is that on CM stable roms or the KatKiss ones? Im asking because i use skype a lot and that is an issue to me. :/
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Exnor said:
Thks for the info but now im confused...
You mentioned that Skype cant use the front cam. Is that on CM stable roms or the KatKiss ones? Im asking because i use skype a lot and that is an issue to me. :/
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On KatKiss 4.3 the camera do t work for me. The CM 10 and 10.1 ROMs and KatKiss 4.2.2 it worked fine. I have not tried any CM 10.2 ROMs.
frederuco said:
On KatKiss 4.3 the camera do t work for me. The CM 10 and 10.1 ROMs and KatKiss 4.2.2 it worked fine. I have not tried any CM 10.2 ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried the stable version recommended on the CM site? Its 9.1.
The 10.x versions are not marked as stable... and i really dont want to re-re-reflash over and over again
Thks
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Exnor said:
Have you tried the stable version recommended on the CM site? Its 9.1.
The 10.x versions are not marked as stable... and i really dont want to re-re-reflash over and over again
Thks
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm, if I did it was a while ago. CM 9 is based on ICS. I have not run an ICS ROM for more than a few hours in over a year. I would say that the Jelly Bean based ROMs (CM10.X) feel SO much faster due to project butter. I flashed back to stock ICS a bit ago, and it feels so sluggish.
Most of the threads on CM 10 you can see how stable they are. I know the No-Name CM 10.1 is rock solid. Joesteink has moved on, but the ROM is still rock solid and many users swear by it.
frederuco said:
Hmmm, if I did it was a while ago. CM 9 is based on ICS. I have not run an ICS ROM for more than a few hours in over a year. I would say that the Jelly Bean based ROMs (CM10.X) feel SO much faster due to project butter. I flashed back to stock ICS a bit ago, and it feels so sluggish.
Most of the threads on CM 10 you can see how stable they are. I know the No-Name CM 10.1 is rock solid. Joesteink has moved on, but the ROM is still rock solid and many users swear by it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cant find the links for that version... only the linaro versions...
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Here is the link to the downloads: http://nexfiles.kjonigsen.net/tf101/cm10.2/
And the thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2402752
frederuco said:
Here is the link to the downloads: http://nexfiles.kjonigsen.net/tf101/cm10.2/
And the thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2402752
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks mate... i'm gonna give it a try and post my results here in case is useful for other people.
Exnor said:
Thanks mate... i'm gonna give it a try and post my results here in case is useful for other people.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is CM finally stable? I had it installed a year or so ago, but then it was still beta for the transformer. Since then I used various flavors and eventually stayed with the EOS-build. Very stable with all the options I ever need (like overclocking and gouvenor-changing). I'm still using EOS, since it's stable and performing very well. Katkiss seems to be the continuation of it, so you could try it yourself And if you don't like it, then you drop it for something else
Anybody know why after loading CM, or PAC, PA, or AOKP then loading Gapps in knocks out the keyboard?
downhillvinnie said:
Anybody know why after loading CM, or PAC, PA, or AOKP then loading Gapps in knocks out the keyboard?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what do you mean?
zeyaan said:
what do you mean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am trying different ROMS on the Tab 2, PAC, CM and they don't come with the Google Apps Play Store, so you have to install it separate. The ROM operates normal up until I flash it, then I get this pop up saying AOSP keyboard stop working. I tried flashing older versions as well and it does the same thing.
downhillvinnie said:
I am trying different ROMS on the Tab 2, PAC, CM and they don't come with the Google Apps Play Store, so you have to install it separate. The ROM operates normal up until I flash it, then I get this pop up saying AOSP keyboard stop working. I tried flashing older versions as well and it does the same thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you flashing 4.3 ROMs with 4.3 gapps? If not it can cause lots of troubles.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T769 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Also, I know there have been issues with a lot of the 4.3 GAPPs packages causing keyboard FCs. On the Razr M, most people have solved the problem by using Slim's AIO or GAPPs packages. I'm not sure if this would fix it on the Tab. I'm still running Slim 4.2 on my Tab, so I haven't had 4.3 experience on it. However, I have had experience with 4.3 on my Razr and I always flash the Slim AIO package and I've never had an issue.
RikRong said:
Also, I know there have been issues with a lot of the 4.3 GAPPs packages causing keyboard FCs. On the Razr M, most people have solved the problem by using Slim's AIO or GAPPs packages. I'm not sure if this would fix it on the Tab. I'm still running Slim 4.2 on my Tab, so I haven't had 4.3 experience on it. However, I have had experience with 4.3 on my Razr and I always flash the Slim AIO package and I've never had an issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ended up using Carbon Rom and they loaded fine, really wierd
downhillvinnie said:
I am trying different ROMS on the my Tab 2, PAC, CM and they don't come with the Google Apps Play Store, so you have to install it separate. The ROM operates normal up until I flash it, then I get this pop up saying AOSP keyboard stop working. I tried flashing older versions as well and it does the same thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The AOSP keyboard is now available on the Play Store (free). You may also want to try SwiftKey or TouchPal.
Hi just got the nexus 5 and its rooted rumning cm11 m9 and all is good. What my question is that will franco kernel work with cm11,m9 as im aware the latest version dont but not too sure about cm11 m9. I have tried searching but no luck.
Don't think so...afaik FK doesn't work with CM and derivatives
Sent from my GT-I9305 using XDA Free mobile app
It should work with older versions, before they implemented CAF, not sure when that happened though.
Kind of pointless though, there are many other roms. Try some out before you decide it is the only one.
Nothing against CM.
Ok thanks for letting me know. Just angry as i gt the franco updater from playstore and it wouldnt let me uninstall or refund it so i had to force uninstall with sd maid pro
wangdaning said:
It should work with older versions, before they implemented CAF, not sure when that happened though.
Kind of pointless though, there are many other roms. Try some out before you decide it is the only one.
Nothing against CM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thing is i have tried many roms on my previuos phomes (s4,s1,wave) but i always got back to cm i dunno i guess i only like CM as its stock google-like but with a few moar features. Paranoid is nice but its too much customized for me lol
I guess ill just wait until frano makes it usable again for cm11 m9
-Turbo- said:
Thing is i have tried many roms on my previuos phomes (s4,s1,wave) but i always got back to cm i dunno i guess i only like CM as its stock google-like but with a few moar features. Paranoid is nice but its too much customized for me lol
I guess ill just wait until frano makes it usable again for cm11 m9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Franco will not become cm compatible. CM is the most customised ROM out there, so much so, it is the only (original) ROM to use CAF. You must use a CAF kernel with CM. Chaos is good.
Otherwise if you must use Franco (seems silly) you'll have to use stock or AOSP.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
You should give Elemental X a try. It complements CM 11 very well.
-Turbo- said:
Thing is i have tried many roms on my previuos phomes (s4,s1,wave) but i always got back to cm i dunno i guess i only like CM as its stock google-like but with a few moar features. Paranoid is nice but its too much customized for me lol
I guess ill just wait until frano makes it usable again for cm11 m9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PA is too customized?
Wha?
#stayparanoid
Pirateghost said:
PA is too customized?
Wha?
Like the features e.g. changing dpi, status bar colors, icons for me its too much. I remember when i had it on my s4 good rom but not for me i like cm or dnt mind omni
And naah its good guess ill stick to stock cm kernel thanks for advice and info ya'all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As mentioned above: franco doesn't work with cm-based ROM!
If u check the franco thread the warning will jump at you...
-Turbo- said:
Pirateghost said:
PA is too customized?
Wha?
Like the features e.g. changing dpi, status bar colors, icons for me its too much. I remember when i had it on my s4 good rom but not for me i like cm or dnt mind omni
And naah its good guess ill stick to stock cm kernel thanks for advice and info ya'all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. You haven't used PA 4.x obviously
#stayparanoid
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know you can choose which tweaks to use right? You don't have to have 238 DPI with luminous pink signal icons. Though that does sound kinda cool!
Pirateghost said:
-Turbo- said:
Yeah. You haven't used PA 4.x obviously
Why? Isit less customized? Look my thread was just about asking if franco is compatible with cm, not changing my rom. No offence to any1 but like i said i love cm rom and if franco is a no go then so be it. Geeeeeeeeeeeeeez
#stayparanoid
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I go between stock ROM and Mahdi and aokp
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Then why mention PA at all? ...and the cite the most ridiculous, childish reason to NOT use it?
If you don't want to cause offense or make yourself look foolish, take more care about what you say. If you don't want to debate anything specific, dont say it at all.
This thread has run its course. Plenty of great cm kernels around.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Looks like answer has been given
Thanks