Database Info

CyberGR v12+ what kernel for battlife?

Hey dudes. I'm going to Poland on tuesday with my class, and now I'm worried about how long my batterylife will be.. I'm currently using Matr1x v19.5 and batterylife is good, but I want even better. So my question is, what kernel do you use with CyberGR to get maximun batterylife? I won't be able to charge my phone for almost 2 days... And I don't care about the performance, just batterylife. And I think I'll use my phone "medium much". Tell me your scheduler and governor tweaks and all that.
Thanks!
Sent from a sandwich using my Nexus S

tjackbjorn said:
Hey dudes. I'm going to Poland on tuesday with my class, and now I'm worried about how long my batterylife will be.. I'm currently using Matr1x v19.5 and batterylife is good, but I want even better. So my question is, what kernel do you use with CyberGR to get maximun batterylife? I won't be able to charge my phone for almost 2 days... And I don't care about the performance, just batterylife. And I think I'll use my phone "medium much". Tell me your scheduler and governor tweaks and all that.
Thanks!
Sent from a sandwich using my Nexus S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think governors and setting are overrated a bit in terms of battery life. It really comes down to your usage and the apps you have.

try this setup on your matr1x19.5
(supercharger v6)
max-400
min-200
gov-smartassv2
sched-noop
if you dont want supercharger
max-800
min-400
gov-same
sched-same
dont forget to make recovery backup if you were flashing supercharger.

zhille said:
try this setup on your matr1x19.5
(supercharger v6)
max-400
min-200
gov-smartassv2
sched-noop
if you dont want supercharger
max-800
min-400
gov-same
sched-same
dont forget to make recovery backup if you were flashing supercharger.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
max- 400Mhz ???? What is supercharger?
Sent from a sandwich using my Nexus S

tjackbjorn said:
max- 400Mhz ???? What is supercharger?
Sent from a sandwich using my Nexus S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well supercharger is making your phone free from lag even if you use its oc on low value..
you can see that supercharger v6 zip file on the thread of cybergr rom..
im not recomending you this one flash this at your own risk..
feel free to hit thanks

Have u thought about Matr1x?

zhille said:
well supercharger is making your phone free from lag even if you use its oc on low value..
you can see that supercharger v6 zip file on the thread of cybergr rom..
im not recomending you this one flash this at your own risk..
feel free to hit thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well ok! Why shouldn't I flash it?
aaaaand you're thanked
[email protected]! said:
Have u thought about Matr1x?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm currently using it, but I have a strange batterylife, yester day I had 4hrs on screen, and today almost 2,5hrs on screen. So wierd
Sent from a sandwich using my Nexus S

you definitely dont need supercharger v6 to have good battery life it doesnt play nice with all setups and its more centered around performance than battery life. And certain governors will make your cpu jump to the max more quickly and hold it there for longer before letting it go back down, so the wrong governor can definitely affect battery life. if your not using the phone that much turn off data, just add the toggle to your notifications to make it easier, (i imagine your rom supports that). if you cant afford to have data all the way off then turn off background syncing facebook ,gmail, music, books etc. matr1x 19.5 cfs on lazy or conservative governors give me decent battery life and good performance for simple tasks i use SIO or Noop schedulers. try increasing the sampling rate on the governor so that it polls less often. also increase the up threshold so that it wont ramp up the cpu until it really needs it like 85 or 90% at least (or higher if you want). read this if you havent already and play with the scripts for better battery that go with each governor. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1369817

T132-ns-cv-56hz-any-201212623

well im just trying to make an a option to use or not to use the supercharger.. basically supercharger is a performance but i think of a trick if its performance im trying to underclock and uc is a way of battery lufe improvement.. supercharger is not recomended to you bcoz you dont know what is it im sorry to say that make an research of it try to figure out what is that and youll find a answer on your own if you will flash it or not.. i apreciate the thank..

well if you don't use it too much, the battery may be able to stand 2 days of medium use.
smartassv2 + sio + deepIdle, limiting freq. 100MHz ~ 800 MHz, turn off mobile data & wifi.
It should be able to last a long time.

TEUV gives a great battery as well as performance.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
As you can see....matrix is the way to go
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2

Rebooting on Sensation XE

Hi, first of all I would just say that I've searched around and tried different things such as putting a piece of paper between the battery and the wall.
The problem is coming after I have used the phone for about two or three minutes, then it just turns off and reboots. After the reboot it just stays on the splash screen and I have to take out the battery and wait a couple minutes to let the phone cool off. It doesn't get very hot, but I can feel it working. I have tried four ROMS but the problem persists. I started getting the reboots after I S-Off'd the phone and upgraded the firmware and installed ICS. Before that the phone could run for hours and it could also become hot (45 degrees celsius) without any problem. I am currently running:
CM 10 (10-20120818-bruce2728-pyramid)
Build number: cm_pyramid-userdebug 4.1.1 JRO0L eng. bruce.20120818.021714 test-keys
Baseband: 11.69.3504.00P_11.22.3504.07_M
Kernel: 3.0.41 [email protected] #1
I'm not using any over/underclock either.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks

UPDATE: I think it is because I undevolted the battery. The only problem is that I can't seem to find the volt option in System Tuner Pro anymore and I don't know which values I should set it to.

b3ndik said:
UPDATE: I think it is because I undevolted the battery. The only problem is that I can't seem to find the volt option in System Tuner Pro anymore and I don't know which values I should set it to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use the reset button there in the voltage section... It will give you back the default voltage
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using xda premium

ganeshp said:
Use the reset button there in the voltage section... It will give you back the default voltage
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will that work even though I don't have any backup saved and wiped multiple times or will it just set the settings to what they are today?

Bump, really need help with this issue due to the fact that I need my phone for everyday use. I'm not coming that far into System Tuner Pro before the phone shuts down. Really annoying.
Thanks

b3ndik said:
Bump, really need help with this issue due to the fact that I need my phone for everyday use. I'm not coming that far into System Tuner Pro before the phone shuts down. Really annoying.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think you can restore 'default' voltage settings in System Tuner unless you have saved a previous configuration as default. I would say your best bet to at least try and get some system stability back is to hit the +12.5 mV button which will add that value to every frequency. Try it once, if no success try a second time but you'll need some care or you might cause some other issues. You only need to get as far as the Voltage tab from the System Tuner main page, hopefully you can do that before the phone shuts down.
To give you some idea where your voltages are sitting, my stock settings started at 800mV @ 192 MHz through to 1325mV @ 1.83 GHz. I have the whole lot undervolted by 12.5mV.

Undervolting doesn't mean reducing the voltage across your battery.
It's just reducing the potential difference across your processor.
Now, to remove the undervolage that you've already done, disable the set on boot option in system tuner.
Flash your ROM without wiping & that's all you need to do.
If the problem still persists, try this fix: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1622683

Thanks guys! I can't see any voltage option in System Tuner Pro though. Does this mean that my kernel does not support it? Still running what is stated in the OP. Really appreciate it.

So, now I have AHRD with 3.33 fw. I also have a custom kernel. How does my settings look? Is it supposed to be 12.5v between every stage? I think I only changed the top 4 or so, so I don't have a clue what they should be set to.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Thanks
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda premium
edit: I have also hit the +12.5v button once and twice, still rebooting

b3ndik said:
So, now I have AHRD with 3.33 fw. I also have a custom kernel. How does my settings look? Is it supposed to be 12.5v between every stage? I think I only changed the top 4 or so, so I don't have a clue what they should be set to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks like you're actually overvolted there, even before you hit +12.5mV a couple of times. My default settings were 800mV @ 192 MHz then 12.5mV increase between frequencies as you said, up to 1325mV @ 1.83 GHz.
Which kernel do you have now? For the sake of the argument I'd suggest dropping your voltages back down to normal and see what happens first.

hm
You can try Increasing the Min Feq to the second lowest. dont remember the value. You can also try another kernel, Iv been using brices cm10 for quite while an i hat reboot issues with the tamcore kernel but not with the ones which cme with the rom. The rom is pretty stable now

goatee84 said:
Looks like you're actually overvolted there, even before you hit +12.5mV a couple of times. My default settings were 800mV @ 192 MHz then 12.5mV increase between frequencies as you said, up to 1325mV @ 1.83 GHz.
Which kernel do you have now? For the sake of the argument I'd suggest dropping your voltages back down to normal and see what happens first.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I tried what you said, but it was no good. Now I use this kernel.
Edit: I got 1 min and 37 secs with those settings in Stability Test.
vineetmathew2003 said:
You can try Increasing the Min Feq to the second lowest. dont remember the value. You can also try another kernel, Iv been using brices cm10 for quite while an i hat reboot issues with the tamcore kernel but not with the ones which cme with the rom. The rom is pretty stable now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tried about 4 ROMS, sense and non sense, with stock kernels and without, and it still happens. Really annoying, but thanks for the reply.

It seems that the phone shuts down when it gets hot, not too hot just +-22 degrees celsius. I can let it run for hours when idle, but if i start to surf the web (or any other task) it shuts down after two minutes.

I can't see why your phone would shut down at such a low temperature, there has to be something else going on, I think under/over-volting can be ruled out for the moment. Can I recommend having a read of this thread, I'm thinking a logcat or last_kmsg might be useful in trying to find the problem.
Unfortunately I'm not equipped to decipher logcats etc. so you'll need to pass them on to a dev or someone with a bit of debugging knowledge. For last_kmsg wait until the phone dies, then boot it back up and grab the last_kmsg through adb as per the thread I linked you to.
I can't remember off the top of my head but there are some people on here offering live help on IRC, that might be your best bet. Either that or the dev of the ROM you're using might be able to help.

Thanks, will definately check this out.

[Q] (req) gpu oc N5

Can any dev out there add GPU oc too their kernel ? I have a nexus 7 (2013) with GPU running at 600mhz
I was wondering if it'd be possible at all too do the same on the nexus 5. Considering its been done on the xperia z1 which uses the same GPU.
Xperia kernel thread : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2660679
Would it be possible or difficult? I know that kernel is only compatible with CM' and I wouldn't mind if that was a requirement for it too work on the N5 but id prefer it was implemented on a kernel that would work with slimkat -specifically- slimkat 4.4.2 v3.2 stable
Any response or help on this subject would be greatly appreciated

Check it cl3kener on g+ his uber kernel has built in GPU oc.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

jwhyte said:
Check it cl3kener on g+ his uber kernel has built in GPU oc.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the fast response ' I'll check it out hope it suits my needs

its possible, but its pointless. you get no gain from it, except faster battery loss. and thats not really any gain. plus we are limited to 60 fps, no matter what. you can disable the fps limit, but you will get screen tearing from it.
to unlock the fps limit..
debug.egl.swapinterval=0
copy/paste this line into /system/build.prop/then reboot for it to take affect.

simms22 said:
its possible, but its pointless. you get no gain from it, except faster battery loss. and thats not really any gain. plus we are limited to 60 fps, no matter what. you can disable the fps limit, but you will get screen tearing from it.
to unlock the fps limit..
debug.egl.swapinterval=0
copy/paste this line into /system/build.prop/then reboot for it to take affect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not looking for battery life which is why I asked, I have my max CPU speed set @ 1.5ghz and max of 2 cores on ever, I lose 1% battery overnight, I just wanna see what this thing can produce

tadgerloks said:
I'm not looking for battery life which is why I asked, I have my max CPU speed set @ 1.5ghz and max of 2 cores on ever, I lose 1% battery overnight, I just wanna see what this thing can produce
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as i said, you will not see any gain from it. ive already done some testing with it. if there was any gain from kit, it would of been done with trinity kernel in december. but, there wasnt any gain, so it was left behind.
---------- Post added at 07:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:21 PM ----------
the gpu on the nexus 5 actually scales, between 200mhz and 450mhz. so its not always using 450mhz, only when needed. you see more gain from setting the min and max gpu speed to 450mhz than you see from overclocking the gpu.

simms22 said:
as i said, you will not see any gain from it. ive already done some testing with it. if there was any gain from kit, it would of been done with trinity kernel in december. but, there wasnt any gain, so it was left behind.
---------- Post added at 07:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:21 PM ----------
the gpu on the nexus 5 actually scales, between 200n and 450mhz. so its not always using 450mhz, only when needed. you see more gain from setting the min and max gpu speed to 450mhz than you see from overclocking the gpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info , I appreciate it ! I was disappointed trinity didn't have it , I was very fond of that kernel and GPU oc on my galaxy nexus

I'll play around with that kernel for a while and exp with the min and max frequencies too find what works best for me, and I'll probably go back to setting CPU freq @ 2.5ghz max 1.5ghz min , I know I have a problem and a real need for speed
Another question, would I have too manually edit the GPU speed on uberkernel using root explorer? I didn't see Amy config options GPU related on trickster mod, maybe I should use kernel tuner instead ?

I believe stock clock is 533 on uber kernel.
Chet kener on g+.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

tadgerloks said:
I know I have a problem and a real need for speed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ive had that need for speed for a while now, good thing that i dont consider it a problem
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

tadgerloks said:
Another question, would I have too manually edit the GPU speed on uberkernel using root explorer? I didn't see Amy config options GPU related on trickster mod, maybe I should use kernel tuner instead ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
There are the GPU settings in Trickster Mod (frequency and governor). You need to update the app with the last beta version since they added support for the Adreno 330. It's under the specific tab.
And yes 533 Mhz is the default GPU clock in this kernel, but you can underclock to the stock GPU freq (450 Mhz) with Trickster Mod.
Sent from my LG-D802 using xda premium

LG G Flex 2 Runs Better with Battery Saver On....

I was curious about this phone's overheating/lag problems, so I thought I'd try turning on Battery Saver. It seems to be much smoother now. Still not quite perfect, but it's a step forward; at least for me. Now if only I could do something about those dreadful orange bars...
Can anyone else corroborate with my results? I've also read online about an update - v10h - that "transforms" the phone into a lagless beast. Anyone received that update yet? Here's a link to the source: http://www.digitaltrends.com/cell-phone-reviews/lg-g-flex2-review/

I have the V10c-226-01 update, and the phone is ok.

happyjack96 said:
I was curious about this phone's overheating/lag problems, so I thought I'd try turning on Battery Saver. It seems to be much smoother now. Still not quite perfect, but it's a step forward; at least for me. Now if only I could do something about those dreadful orange bars...
Can anyone else corroborate with my results? I've also read online about an update - v10h - that "transforms" the phone into a lagless beast. Anyone received that update yet? Here's a link to the source: http://www.digitaltrends.com/cell-phone-reviews/lg-g-flex2-review/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will test the battery saver but it seems weird that it's impact performance in a positive way. It should limit it not the other way around.

That's strange how'd he get that update? A lot of people have received 10e just recently which is 2 updates away from that one. I'm still on 10c.
Sent from my LG-H959 using XDA Free mobile app

hey, guys, don't have the phone at the moment, but had anyone tried undervolting and underclocking?
The main reason i think, it should help, is because android ran perfectly smooth on my old HTC One X, with S4 Pro, quad-core @ 1500Mhz.
Afaik, we need a custom kernel to modify voltage, but underclocking may be the option for those, who suffers from overheating.

dark.wizard said:
hey, guys, don't have the phone at the moment, but had anyone tried undervolting and underclocking?
The main reason i think, it should help, is because android ran perfectly smooth on my old HTC One X, with S4 Pro, quad-core @ 1500Mhz.
Afaik, we need a custom kernel to modify voltage, but underclocking may be the option for those, who suffers from overheating.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The phone is undercloked by default to 1500Mhz.

Ronee33 said:
The phone is undercloked by default to 1500Mhz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No!
Download aida64

Bilux said:
No!
Download aida64
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right the update fixed it.
Sent from my LG-H955 using xda Forum

Bilux said:
No!
Download aida64
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure what you're talking about....
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my LG-H950 using XDA Free mobile app

gtamgs15 said:
Not sure what you're talking about....
Sent from my LG-H950 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hm?
1958MHz.... no 1500MHz limit!

Bilux said:
hm?
1958MHz.... no 1500MHz limit!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4 of my cores are running 1555.
Sent from my LG-H950 using XDA Free mobile app

I think the reason it runs better with Battery Saver is because it prevents it from overheating in the first place. Even with Battery Saver limiting the CPU to power sipping levels, it is still a fairly powerful CPU, certainly enough to run the OS. I'll run an Antutu Benchmark with it on vs off.

Okay, I ran the benchmarks. The results are very surprising! The score with Battery Saver on is 10000 points higher than with it off. Both results are after a clean boot and both were done with the device cool. Although, a benchmark I did 2 days ago with no Battery Saver had a score of 43000. That may have been because I had fewer apps installed.

I did the same tests. 1st one without battery saver on, 2nd with it on. I got similar results, but not as severe. Both were on a fresh boot. However the 2nd test was shortly after the first, so it might have been a little warm.
Test one :
Test two:
I guess we need to figure out what the battery saver is doing and make a permanent tweak.
Sent from my LG-H950 using XDA Free mobile app

it's limiting the top frequency of the processor, and maybe sets the governor to conservative, i guess.
You can turn it on, and check cpu frequency in sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq
(path may vary, it's from my Moto X, but i think, they're common)
Then turn it off, to see, if it changes.

I found something else interesting. I looked into the CPU info in Antutu, and, with Battery Saver off, the CPU max frequency was at 1.5ghz, but with BS on, it was 1.9ghz

happyjack96 said:
I found something else interesting. I looked into the CPU info in Antutu, and, with Battery Saver off, the CPU max frequency was at 1.5ghz, but with BS on, it was 1.9ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's interesting. I'm wondering if the benchmarks were updated to work with our processor.
Sent from my LG-H950 using XDA Premium HD app

BS seems to have no effect on my phone.
Why are your cold scores so low?

I've been running my G flex 2 with two A57 cores disabled. In typically averaging about 6 hours of screen on time. Just general use; YouTube, Facebook, looking up LG G4 reviews, texting, other social networking apps. Just wanted to say disabling cores has really worked out for me so far... I also accidentally deleted LGs stock UI, so I've been using nova

BillyxAllen said:
I've been running my G flex 2 with two A57 cores disabled. In typically averaging about 6 hours of screen on time. Just general use; YouTube, Facebook, looking up LG G4 reviews, texting, other social networking apps. Just wanted to say disabling cores has really worked out for me so far... I also accidentally deleted LGs stock UI, so I've been using nova
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did you disable the cores? Is there custom kernel for this phone?

66K Antutu?!

So I just ran Antutu benchmark and got 66000 points!
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Normally it should be around 40-48k or not?
What scores are you achieving with your Note 3 ?
I used Note 3 Hlte SM-N9005XXUGBOD3 - Temaseks CM13 v10.0 - idlekernel @2.73 - CPU Governor: performance and battery settings to more power.

Woah that was crazy! And that all is green!
You already on par with SD805! (Right?)
By the way, 55k is my record with n900
Aurora rom with SueMax kernel
My setting is min and max freq @ 2.0ghz lol (btw, not my daily settings, just for benchmark)

@pitopika13 ,Crazyyyy?what the ****,this is crazy................My record..........

kppus said:
@pitopika13 ,Crazyyyy?what the ****,this is crazy................My record..........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow I knew that you could get theoretical note 4 performance with an OC'd Note 3 but now almost as much as Note 5 ? I think I found another reason to keep this bulky phone with me :laugh:

My highest was 59k with phronesis note 5 port.
Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk

hello guys , I'll come back with a better score ..........

I do 63 000 each time with this 6.0 Touchwiz ROM : http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-note-3/development/6-0-1-touchwiz-marshmallow-note-3-t3349306

I used to get 69k with note 5 port+overclocked lean kernel. Still it's just a benchmarking. I was using power saving daily because at the end battery life is more important.
Sent from my SM-G925F

Got 58k as DarkLord ROM without optimization.

pitopika13 said:
Woah that was crazy! And that all is green!
You already on par with SD805! (Right?)
By the way, 55k is my record with n900
Aurora rom with SueMax kernel
My setting is min and max freq @ 2.0ghz lol (btw, not my daily settings, just for benchmark)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also had 54000 points with the new version of Antutu.
Lollipop 5.0 rom stock N900

Rosli59564 said:
I used to get 69k with note 5 port+overclocked lean kernel. Still it's just a benchmarking. I was using power saving daily because at the end battery life is more important.
Sent from my SM-G925F
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would realy like to see a screenshot if that score. :laugh:
Managed to squize a little bit more out of my note 3 and got 67508 points (with better GPU governor)

holzmans said:
I also had 54000 points with the new version of Antutu.
Lollipop 5.0 rom stock N900
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Woah stock! With all stability, you could get that high on n900, maybe i should go back to stock eh lol
Since my 55k score mean my phone would be unstable for daily usage.

pitopika13 said:
Woah stock! With all stability, you could get that high on n900, maybe i should go back to stock eh lol
Since my 55k score mean my phone would be unstable for daily usage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just think that Antutu gives the highest values ​​in the new version only for new phone models have very high ratings. In previous versions just get around 40k and 54k now without changing the Rom or overclock or anything.

holzmans said:
I just think that Antutu gives the highest values ​​in the new version only for new phone models have very high ratings. In previous versions just get around 40k and 54k now without changing the Rom or overclock or anything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yess, you're right, i6s used to be around 68k below the S6 and now, it is all the way to the 130k?! I know the new app version is more compatible with the new platform but that's far
Back on topic
I think it's almost impossible to best my own score @55k with my settings, always around 54-55k, i havent try any other rom though. :silly:

Can you guys give some tips on kernel settings etc before benchmark?

jordanpa said:
Can you guys give some tips on kernel settings etc before benchmark?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's your phone version? (N900 or N9005)
Also dont rely on kernel only, a stable rom also gives a good antutu score.

pitopika13 said:
What's your phone version? (N900 or N9005)
Also dont rely on kernel only, a stable rom also gives a good antutu score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
N9005 -I am just curious as all the Rom's I have tested are give or take 45-55k score so when I saw these screenshots I assumed there must be kernel configurations you make prior to benchmarking..

jordanpa said:
N9005 -I am just curious as all the Rom's I have tested are give or take 45-55k score so when I saw these screenshots I assumed there must be kernel configurations you make prior to benchmarking..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I posted all settings below the screenshot in #1
Only changed GPU governor to performance later on.