Database Info

T-Mobile G2x by LG Benchmark Score

I have ran the Quadrand Standard Benchmark on my phone several times now. The highest score I have ever seen on a phone is 2592.
My old Samsung Vibrant couldn't even do half of that. I don't rely TOO MUCH on the benchmarks but they do give you a GENERAL I dea of what your phone is capable of.
My phone is rooted but the processing power was not boosted in any way, using any program. Just the raw, everyday processing power.
FEEL FREE TO POST YOUR BEST SCORES UP!
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App

This is my highest score as of yet.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

My score is 2500 average. I want to remove some T-Mobile crap soon. Score may go higher.
@DrowsyMalice: i see you use a task killer. You should read this article : http://androidspin.com/2010/05/25/why-you-dont-need-a-task-killer-app-with-android/

I question the validity and reliability of a test such as quadrant.
why is it that scores can be so inconsistent on a single device, even if you run tests back to back to back?
I must have missed the memo somewhere explaining this, as well as how the scores are standardized between devices.

OrganizedFellow said:
My score is 2500 average. I want to remove some T-Mobile crap soon. Score may go higher.
@DrowsyMalice: i see you use a task killer. You should read this article : http://androidspin.com/2010/05/25/why-you-dont-need-a-task-killer-app-with-android/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your concern but I'm fully aware of what to kill and what not to kill lol
I have applications that I don't want randomly ran frozen, and applications that I'm done with, killed.
Thanks.

Cyanogen Demonstrates Quadrant’s Flaws - BriefMobile - http://goo.gl/hpuZM

Post G2X Patch http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1051616
Quad standard: ~2400
Quad advansed: ~2650

Vibrant
Ive benched higher on my customized Vibrant. It was overclocked @1.2 Ghz. I actually like my vibrant alot more with the screen and size and roms. So far I think my G2X is just kind of iffy. Cant wait til some roms come out and some stuff optimized for the tegra2. It took the vibrant almost a year to get where it is today and Alot of thanks go out to the developers, for almost tripling the original performance. The only reason I upgraded to the G2X was camera flash... Oh well.

I hit 2749 after 4 subsequent runs all in the high 2600s/low 2700s. This is after applying the pre-dexopt patch, so I recommend you guys go over and get it. Before I applied the patch I was getting high 2300s/low 2500s.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1117

mapin0518 said:
I hit 2749 after 4 subsequent runs all in the high 2600s/low 2700s. This is after applying the pre-dexopt patch, so I recommend you guys go over and get it. Before I applied the patch I was getting high 2300s/low 2500s.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1117
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have similar scores after the patch. I have had around 2900+ with MT4G overclocked at 1812 max (do not leave it at max - use a conservative 1612 - lol) with faux lv CM7 Kernel.
Quadrant scores are suspect however, as Linpack scores tell a different story. With MT4G above, get mid 50"s to low 60's. With G2X - I cannot break even 40.
I think it will do much better overclocked of course, and even better when we finally get a genuine duel core ROM on it - like 2.4 or 3.1.
But the fact remains that even with similar Quadrant scores, the linpack scores are not very high on the stock G2X.

So far I've gotten 2412. Completely stock, no root, nada!

DrowsyMalice said:
This is my highest score as of yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dont know about THE BENCH! BUT THAT GIRL at the bottom!!!!!!!!!!!!

nodrogkam said:
I question the validity and reliability of a test such as quadrant.
why is it that scores can be so inconsistent on a single device, even if you run tests back to back to back?
I must have missed the memo somewhere explaining this, as well as how the scores are standardized between devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ignore the first run, then run it 10 times, dropping any with erroneous values, and average the scores. It's benchmarking, you're never going to get the same result especially on a device that's running so many active services that fire off at random. That's also why I bought Quadrant Advance since it allows running the phone in airplane mode and also breaks down the scores for better analysis.
Using that process I'm averaging about 2450 on a stock phone.

rooted s-off
stock rom and kernel
Quadrant: 2724
smartbench 2011: productivity:2970
Games:2516
neocore:80.1FPS
nenmark:57.4FPS

Highest score so far was 2640 on quadrant.

..........

I got 2600+ ...rooted , stock rom.

this is my fist run after installing patch on my G2x.. hit 2676

[/IMG]
I got this the first day. Now I get around 2750.

OrganizedFellow said:
Cyanogen Demonstrates Quadrant’s Flaws - BriefMobile - http://goo.gl/hpuZM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like how in this article they said obscenely high score and it was something like 2700 and my G2x gets too 2500 without tampering with the partition. Gotta love dual core.

[Q] Quadrant scores?

Hello. I've bought a nexus s a few days ago and I've started swapping roms.
My question is simple, how do people manage to get 4-5k quadrant scores?
Currently I'm using Pure Bionix 1.6 rom, but the maximum score I was able to get was around 3.3K.
Describe everything you do, from roms/kernels to apps closed etc.
Sorry if this is a newbie question

Install 1.6.1, then use SetCPU to OC the kernel.
That's how I achieved my 5300 quad.
You can also try other kernels as well.
YMMV

Use matrix rom amd just over clock abd run quadrant a few times back to back and you will hit 4500+
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA Premium App

cyanogenmod 7 + trinity 1.44
4500-5000

Oxygen 2.3.1 @ 1300Mhz ->> 4286, highest score for me with this ROM.
And I didn't do anything special to get this score, I only overclocked CPU.

Thanks for the answers. I've done as you've said krylon. I installed 1.6.1 and oced the cpu to 1540 1540 on demand, however the max score I was able to get was around 3400. Am I missing something?
I'm using adv task killer to kill all the running apps before the test.
My nexus s is an i9023 btw.

spartanpg said:
Thanks for the answers. I've done as you've said krylon. I installed 1.6.1 and oced the cpu to 1540 1540 on demand, however the max score I was able to get was around 3400. Am I missing something?
I'm using adv task killer to kill all the running apps before the test.
My nexus s is an i9023 btw.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
set setcpu to 1540 max/1540 low. bench four times in a row, throw out the first 2 results, the forth should be the highest.

That's what I'm doing atm, yet the max I get is 3400.
Me and my luck with cell phones

spartanpg said:
That's what I'm doing atm, yet the max I get is 3400.
Me and my luck with cell phones
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its possible that your phone doesnt like that high of a overclock. try trinity t144 kernel. also, have you updated to the most recent bionix?

I flashed the T144 kernel and the phone got a bit slower yet really stable. The thing is the scores went down a little bit, around 3250 which I already expected. Could it be the phone itself?
I've youtubed a bit to watch how other 4000+ runs went and on the first image teste (2d if I'm not mistaken) I'm obtaining a constant 27-28 fps rate, and that was the only difference.

No need to worry about that. Quadrant scores can be faked and really don't mean much when it comes down to it. It's all about the real world performance.

spartanpg said:
I flashed the T144 kernel and the phone got a bit slower yet really stable. The thing is the scores went down a little bit, around 3250 which I already expected. Could it be the phone itself?
I've youtubed a bit to watch how other 4000+ runs went and on the first image teste (2d if I'm not mistaken) I'm obtaining a constant 27-28 fps rate, and that was the only difference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you using quadrant advanced or standard? if youre using quadrant advanced, could you provide a screenshot please. id really like to see the score breakdown. the score is really low. also, in the op of the Trinity thread in the development section is a dalvik-wiper.zip, would you flash it please, then try again.
---------- Post added at 01:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:44 PM ----------
qbking77 said:
No need to worry about that. Quadrant scores can be faked and really don't mean much when it comes down to it. It's all about the real world performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
orgasms can be faked too, that doesnt mean anybody is faking there quadrant scores here. with such a low quadrant score for these kernels, i bet his real world performance is reduced also.

simms22 said:
orgasms can be faked too, that doesnt mean anybody is faking there quadrant scores here. with such a low quadrant score for these kernels, i bet his real world performance is reduced also.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While not necessarily being faked you can't say that a test where you throw out the first three scores and then use the forth because it is always higher is terribly accurate or being honest. Just because you ran quadrant four times and got a score with 500 more points on the last test doesn't automatically mean your real world performance is that much better. Honestly it's just the Android equivlant of buying a really big truck to overcompensate for something else (not to mention the cause of people always asking these types of questions over and over).

So after searching around I found some1 in xda with a similar problem and I ended using this in the terminal:
su(press enter)
mount -o remount,noauto_da_alloc /data /data(press enter)
And believe it or not, after that I managed to get 4500 right away in standard quadrant 1.1.7. After closing apps and getting advanced quadrant 1.1.1, I managed to get 4900, which is more than fine for me. What I'd like to know is what exacly did that command do.
Regarding the dalvik-wiper.zip, I wasn't able to find it. Will it by any means increase the performance further?
Finally I'd like to ask two things:
1) How safe is it to run a Min 100 Max 1440 OC setting?
2) In case of warranty issues, will this fully revert the phone to the original (or updated from original) state? - http://nexusshacks.com/nexus-s-hacks/how-to-unroot-nexus-s-i9020ti9020ai9023/
Thanks for all the help so far

spartanpg said:
So after searching around I found some1 in xda with a similar problem and I ended using this in the terminal:
su(press enter)
mount -o remount,noauto_da_alloc /data /data(press enter)
And believe it or not, after that I managed to get 4500 right away in standard quadrant 1.1.7. After closing apps and getting advanced quadrant 1.1.1, I managed to get 4900, which is more than fine for me. What I'd like to know is what exacly did that command do.
Regarding the dalvik-wiper.zip, I wasn't able to find it. Will it by any means increase the performance further?
Finally I'd like to ask two things:
1) How safe is it to run a Min 100 Max 1440 OC setting?
2) In case of warranty issues, will this fully revert the phone to the original (or updated from original) state? - http://nexusshacks.com/nexus-s-hacks/how-to-unroot-nexus-s-i9020ti9020ai9023/
Thanks for all the help so far
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i didnt even consider that because its included in the bionix/trinity combo. but it does have to be included in a stock rom. whats odd is, how did you lose it
---------- Post added at 03:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:21 PM ----------
onigiri1692 said:
While not necessarily being faked you can't say that a test where you throw out the first three scores and then use the forth because it is always higher is terribly accurate or being honest. Just because you ran quadrant four times and got a score with 500 more points on the last test doesn't automatically mean your real world performance is that much better. Honestly it's just the Android equivlant of buying a really big truck to overcompensate for something else (not to mention the cause of people always asking these types of questions over and over).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you are in a way right and in a way youre wrong, im not going to argue the fact that all benchmarks are inaccurate. because they are. and ive proved it over and over again. BUT, that said.. its a good way to see where the phones performence is and where it should be(if youre not cheating), especially if youre a developer. for example, when morfic makes some changes in a kernel, we run benchmarks to see how and where that change effected the performance.

simms22 said:
you are in a way right and in a way youre wrong, im not going to argue the fact that all benchmarks are inaccurate. because they are. and ive proved it over and over again. BUT, that said.. its a good way to see where the phones performence is and where it should be(if youre not cheating), especially if youre a developer. for example, when morfic makes some changes in a kernel, we run benchmarks to see how and where that change effected the performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was just making the point that most of the super high quadrant scores are inflated and not very accurate, but I agree with you in that benchmarks are a good way to make general comparisons like the example you described, but it isn't an end all, be all. When it comes down to it real world, user experience in my opinion is what really matters.

onigiri1692 said:
I was just making the point that most of the super high quadrant scores are inflated and not very accurate, but I agree with you in that benchmarks are a good way to make general comparisons like the example you described, but it isn't an end all, be all. When it comes down to it real world, user experience in my opinion is what really matters.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
real world use is all that matters, period. but quadrants are still fun to run, as long as no body is cheating. speaking of, this is from a galaxy s 2 at 1.6ghz, the nexus s has officially been dethroned from the top of quadrant.. http://androidcommunity.com/samsung...-benchmarks-nearly-7800-in-quadrant-20111110/
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Any chance I could get these answered please? Would really apreciate it.
1) How safe is it to run a Min 100 Max 1440 OC setting?
2) In case of warranty issues, will this fully revert the phone to the original (or updated from original) state? - http://nexusshacks.com/nexus-s-hacks...0ti9020ai9023/

Question about quadrant scores!!!!

Hello everyone I just have a quick question... What is the trick to get quadrant scores up above 5000? I've seen many people with high scores and I've tried everything and never got out of the 4000`s, actually every time I've ran quadrant, HTC one x beats out my device.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app

ray7171 said:
Hello everyone I just have a quick question... What is the trick to get quadrant scores up above 5000? I've seen many people with high scores and I've tried everything and never got out of the 4000`s, actually every time I've ran quadrant, HTC one x beats out my device.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends, is your phone rooted? Or is it just running stock TW?
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app

ray7171 said:
Hello everyone I just have a quick question... What is the trick to get quadrant scores up above 5000? I've seen many people with high scores and I've tried everything and never got out of the 4000`s, actually every time I've ran quadrant, HTC one x beats out my device.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
who cares Its just a number. But if it means that much to you run it several times in a row, it will eventually mess up and give you a hugh fake number You can show all your friends
I got over 30,000 once on my dx and it was still choppy!

piiman said:
who cares Its just a number. But if it means that much to you run it several times in a row, it will eventually mess up and give you a hugh fake number You can show all your friends
I got over 30,000 once on my dx and it was still choppy!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, its a number, and trying to "increase" it to make the phone "faster" is dumb. If stock has a 1.5ghz clock and scored lets say 4800, Cm10 might be +/- 200 but on the same clock it cant score much higher..... without dumb modifications to fake it.

It is not dumb at all.. You are trying to optimize the performance of your phone.. Make sure battery power saving is turned off, close all applications, usually running after a fresh reboot help. Overclocking helps.
I scored this https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/s720x720/527107_10151086780898557_1408887957_n.jpg

I was saying the number of 4800 as an example. And yes power saving lowers cpu clock I believe so that affects the score. I'm running a test on cm10 no overclock or anything to show what a true score is. of course overclocking makes it faster, thats not dumb but modifications geared to increase the actual score is silly.
Just got 4400.

These tools are used to give an estimate of how your device compares to other devices... That being said I am running Cleanrom/Cleankernel and get just about the same numbers all the time except for Linpack... I have my phone overclocked to 1800-1999 ghz and my scores are below but it depends on your hardware too... You might not be able to push some phones that high but mine is totally stable at these overclocks so I def have a keeper but my damn home button sticks so I am in the process of getting a replacement... Much love to Cleanrom though!! :good:
I also have no secrets as to make my score higher and even if I did that would be stupid!! IMO

Pretty much all developers will tell you quadrant and benchmarks do not (always) translate to real world performance.
That said: ROMs and kernels will affect scores.
CPU governors will affect scores
Overclocking your CPU will boost our score.
The current jellybean leaks is very fast - will give you scores of 5500+ if that's what our looking for.
Sent from a SYNERGIZED GalaxySIII

Why are people over clocking this phone? Is their anything on Android that really needs more power then a dual core S4 at 1.5ghz?

[email protected] said:
Why are people over clocking this phone? Is their anything on Android that really needs more power then a dual core S4 at 1.5ghz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, not at all............ someone here please tell me why the phone isnt fast enough enough at 1.5?

tonu42 said:
Yep, its a number, and trying to "increase" it to make the phone "faster" is dumb. If stock has a 1.5ghz clock and scored lets say 4800, Cm10 might be +/- 200 but on the same clock it cant score much higher..... without dumb modifications to fake it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The point is Quadrant sucks and is unreliable, I wasn't kidding when I said I got a 30,000 once....Run it a few times in a row it gets a little better as you repeat. Different biuldprop settings can also make a big difference so different ROMS could easily have vastly different scores.. You couldn't see that +/-200 in real life anyways...... admit it you just want bragging rights :highfive: cooomme onnn admit it

tonu42 said:
Nope, not at all............ someone here please tell me why the phone isnt fast enough enough at 1.5?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I run mine at 1.2 and honestly I can't tell a difference between 1.2, 1.5, and 2.1 beyond benches telling me it's faster.
Please excuse my Galaxy S III, it's a bit Paranoid.

Just for fun....I loaded unofficial cm 9/13 by invisiblek, antutu was 7383. I then loaded ktoonz kernel, it goes up to 8123 (did not overclock). There was someone oc'ed it and got >9000.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

tonu42 said:
Nope, not at all............ someone here please tell me why the phone isnt fast enough enough at 1.5?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you dont belong here i think... you've missed the point entirely.
BECAUSE YOU CAN

Clienterror said:
I run mine at 1.2 and honestly I can't tell a difference between 1.2, 1.5, and 2.1 beyond benches telling me it's faster.
Please excuse my Galaxy S III, it's a bit Paranoid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just run the phone at 1.0ghz to save on battery and apart from the occasional lag that comes with it, it's not that bad. Had my battery go over 2 days without a single charge due to the underclocking.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app

Absolutely stock here. Don't get hung up over benchmark scores... they're only useful for comparing YOUR device before and after you make changes.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
If you REALLY want the best score (and I recommend this when you use a benchmark the right way... like I said, to measure the result of changes), restart your phone, let everything load, then run it. A bunch of background operations can and will slow things down.
But again... they're meaningless for the most part. I could run it again now and the numbers could be wildly different.

Quadrant scores mean nothing.

Maybe u guys just don't know how to test very well or thoroughly, or don't know what to look for. Benchmarks do help. If u know how to use them. No, they don't always show real world use. They should be used to determine the phones maximum. I use them for judging how well they will play through the hardest emulator game, or most intense Android game. It isn't the only thing I go by, but when figuring out new settings or trying to push a new kernel to its absolute max, it is useful as well.
Swyped from my eVo

LG G Flex 2 Runs Better with Battery Saver On....

I was curious about this phone's overheating/lag problems, so I thought I'd try turning on Battery Saver. It seems to be much smoother now. Still not quite perfect, but it's a step forward; at least for me. Now if only I could do something about those dreadful orange bars...
Can anyone else corroborate with my results? I've also read online about an update - v10h - that "transforms" the phone into a lagless beast. Anyone received that update yet? Here's a link to the source: http://www.digitaltrends.com/cell-phone-reviews/lg-g-flex2-review/

I have the V10c-226-01 update, and the phone is ok.

happyjack96 said:
I was curious about this phone's overheating/lag problems, so I thought I'd try turning on Battery Saver. It seems to be much smoother now. Still not quite perfect, but it's a step forward; at least for me. Now if only I could do something about those dreadful orange bars...
Can anyone else corroborate with my results? I've also read online about an update - v10h - that "transforms" the phone into a lagless beast. Anyone received that update yet? Here's a link to the source: http://www.digitaltrends.com/cell-phone-reviews/lg-g-flex2-review/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will test the battery saver but it seems weird that it's impact performance in a positive way. It should limit it not the other way around.

That's strange how'd he get that update? A lot of people have received 10e just recently which is 2 updates away from that one. I'm still on 10c.
Sent from my LG-H959 using XDA Free mobile app

hey, guys, don't have the phone at the moment, but had anyone tried undervolting and underclocking?
The main reason i think, it should help, is because android ran perfectly smooth on my old HTC One X, with S4 Pro, quad-core @ 1500Mhz.
Afaik, we need a custom kernel to modify voltage, but underclocking may be the option for those, who suffers from overheating.

dark.wizard said:
hey, guys, don't have the phone at the moment, but had anyone tried undervolting and underclocking?
The main reason i think, it should help, is because android ran perfectly smooth on my old HTC One X, with S4 Pro, quad-core @ 1500Mhz.
Afaik, we need a custom kernel to modify voltage, but underclocking may be the option for those, who suffers from overheating.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The phone is undercloked by default to 1500Mhz.

Ronee33 said:
The phone is undercloked by default to 1500Mhz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No!
Download aida64

Bilux said:
No!
Download aida64
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right the update fixed it.
Sent from my LG-H955 using xda Forum

Bilux said:
No!
Download aida64
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure what you're talking about....
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my LG-H950 using XDA Free mobile app

gtamgs15 said:
Not sure what you're talking about....
Sent from my LG-H950 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hm?
1958MHz.... no 1500MHz limit!

Bilux said:
hm?
1958MHz.... no 1500MHz limit!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4 of my cores are running 1555.
Sent from my LG-H950 using XDA Free mobile app

I think the reason it runs better with Battery Saver is because it prevents it from overheating in the first place. Even with Battery Saver limiting the CPU to power sipping levels, it is still a fairly powerful CPU, certainly enough to run the OS. I'll run an Antutu Benchmark with it on vs off.

Okay, I ran the benchmarks. The results are very surprising! The score with Battery Saver on is 10000 points higher than with it off. Both results are after a clean boot and both were done with the device cool. Although, a benchmark I did 2 days ago with no Battery Saver had a score of 43000. That may have been because I had fewer apps installed.

I did the same tests. 1st one without battery saver on, 2nd with it on. I got similar results, but not as severe. Both were on a fresh boot. However the 2nd test was shortly after the first, so it might have been a little warm.
Test one :
Test two:
I guess we need to figure out what the battery saver is doing and make a permanent tweak.
Sent from my LG-H950 using XDA Free mobile app

it's limiting the top frequency of the processor, and maybe sets the governor to conservative, i guess.
You can turn it on, and check cpu frequency in sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq
(path may vary, it's from my Moto X, but i think, they're common)
Then turn it off, to see, if it changes.

I found something else interesting. I looked into the CPU info in Antutu, and, with Battery Saver off, the CPU max frequency was at 1.5ghz, but with BS on, it was 1.9ghz

happyjack96 said:
I found something else interesting. I looked into the CPU info in Antutu, and, with Battery Saver off, the CPU max frequency was at 1.5ghz, but with BS on, it was 1.9ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's interesting. I'm wondering if the benchmarks were updated to work with our processor.
Sent from my LG-H950 using XDA Premium HD app

BS seems to have no effect on my phone.
Why are your cold scores so low?

I've been running my G flex 2 with two A57 cores disabled. In typically averaging about 6 hours of screen on time. Just general use; YouTube, Facebook, looking up LG G4 reviews, texting, other social networking apps. Just wanted to say disabling cores has really worked out for me so far... I also accidentally deleted LGs stock UI, so I've been using nova

BillyxAllen said:
I've been running my G flex 2 with two A57 cores disabled. In typically averaging about 6 hours of screen on time. Just general use; YouTube, Facebook, looking up LG G4 reviews, texting, other social networking apps. Just wanted to say disabling cores has really worked out for me so far... I also accidentally deleted LGs stock UI, so I've been using nova
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How did you disable the cores? Is there custom kernel for this phone?

Benchmarks

Since nobody have posted nothing about benchmarks on this awesome phone, here it is.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

Here is a geekbench3 score on mine...

Last picture didn't post... let's try this again with another geekbench3 result I just got.

dandroid7 said:
Last picture didn't post... let's try this again with another geekbench3 result I just got.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome!
Sent from my SM-N920T using XDA Free mobile app

First time I ran this the day I got the phone I got about 4800 on geekbench3.
Since then, rooted and debloated a little at a time... it just keeps getting faster and smoother.
I got this score running the Noble Alpha kernel tonight, after removing more bloat.
Benchmarks in and of themselves do not prove much. But when comparing same device performance when tweaking, I do believe they are a good indication of performance loss or gains.
I can say... I'm impressed with the note 5.

Antutu

Quadrant...

Antutu Benchmark Score
Antutu Benchmark
Have a great day!

http://browser.primatelabs.com/battery3/141591 my battery test result. Running darthstalker rom v3 and skyhigh kernel 2.1

That's what I've gotten. And I've consistently gotten just over 70k, I am LOVING this phone

So is this good? How well does pcmark score on your device?

So i updated antutu to the latest beta 1 version 6..and here s the tally. Also ran a bunch of other tests...
Using darthstalker v4 with xposed running in the bakground, skyhigh 2.1 kernel with a57 locked to 2.4 and a general undervolt of -87.5mv accross the board (-100mv actually on the a53 cores) and 852mhz gpu clock (so basically i m kinda maxed out ) ) everything runs perfectly smooth and stable and my main goal with all.the tweaking actually is to know that i ll be golden till the note 7 comes out LOL (at least).

My highest scores

aldoblaga said:
So i updated antutu to the latest beta 1 version 6..and here s the tally. Also ran a bunch of other tests...
Using darthstalker v4 with xposed running in the bakground, skyhigh 2.1 kernel with a57 locked to 2.4 and a general undervolt of -87.5mv accross the board (-100mv actually on the a53 cores) and 852mhz gpu clock (so basically i m kinda maxed out ) ) everything runs perfectly smooth and stable and my main goal with all.the tweaking actually is to know that i ll be golden till the note 7 comes out LOL (at least).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Something wrong with my phone. I/O test is gonna fly

alexander1995 said:
Something wrong with my phone. I/O test is gonna flyView attachment 3548240
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome ???

aldoblaga said:
Awesome ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait for the official version to fix this bug

Antutu

I don't get why mine is so slow... I get the same general AnTuTu scores across stock, arter97, and now Skyhigh. It's the same with every benchmark, slower than it should be. =/
One thing I noticed... Synapse always shows Core 2 at -1C... I wonder if I have a faulty chip?

EtherealRemnant said:
I don't get why mine is so slow... I get the same general AnTuTu scores across stock, arter97, and now Skyhigh. It's the same with every benchmark, slower than it should be. =/
One thing I noticed... Synapse always shows Core 2 at -1C... I wonder if I have a faulty chip?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thermal throttling my friend. Try leaving the phone in a cool place for 10 minutes and then running another benchmark. Your scores should be around 69-70 or above, normally.

aldoblaga said:
Thermal throttling my friend. Try leaving the phone in a cool place for 10 minutes and then running another benchmark. Your scores should be around 69-70 or above, normally.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's some serious heat this chip produces. My 4940MX runs about as hot as the Exynos does lol
I'm sitting in a room where it's like 18C at the moment but I suppose I could stick it in the fridge.