I read the thread about the chaos kernel and didn't understand how to know if my Rom is supported. Can you just answer that?
jbrooks58 said:
After re-reading my post I understand why you would see it that way so I will just ask you one question. I read the thread about the chaos kernel and didn't understand how to know if my Rom is supported. Can you just answer that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Chaos is meant for CAF roms, so if your rom is CAF it is supported.
If your rom is AOSP, only versions up to 9.2 will work.
Chromium_ said:
Chaos is meant for CAF roms, so if your rom is CAF it is supported.
If your rom is AOSP, only versions up to 9.2 will work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am looking at using beanstalk which is CM 11 based which means it is CAF correct?
jbrooks58 said:
I am looking at using beanstalk which is CM 11 based which means it is CAF correct?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, exactly. Beanstalk is based off of CM11, which is CAF, so it should work fine with Chaos.
Edit: Although Beanstalk is CAF, after checking out the Chaos thread it seems that it does not work with Beanstalk.
Edit2: Read the last paragraph of this post. This is probably why Chaos doesnt work.
Chromium_ said:
Yup, exactly. Beanstalk is based off of CM11, which is CAF, so it should work fine with Chaos.
Edit: Although Beanstalk is CAF, after checking out the Chaos thread it seems that it does not work with Beanstalk.
Edit2: Read the last paragraph of this post. This is probably why Chaos doesnt work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are AOKP ROMS CAF such as Dirty Unicorns?
Also how do you utilize the search feature so well? Whenever I use "search this forum" it brings up things that has nothing to do with my search? For instance if I search "Paranoid Android" it shows almost every ROM in the development section.
jbrooks58 said:
Are AOKP ROMS CAF such as Dirty Unicorns?
Also how do you utilize the search feature so well? Whenever I use "search this forum" it brings up things that has nothing to do with my search? For instance if I search "Paranoid Android" it shows almost every ROM in the development section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I believe AOKP based roms are CAF as well.
I dont use the "Search this forum" feature. I use the "Search this thread" box found in all threads. For example, on the Chaos kernel thread i did a search for "beanstalk". It then brought up a bunch of results where people had mentioned the word "beanstalk", and I found that they were having issues using it with the kernel.
And dirty unicorns is based off omni rom.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
Kreateablaze said:
And dirty unicorns is based off omni rom.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True. Meaning that if you are to go with DU, you'll need an AOSP kernel rather than CAF.
Related
I'm in disbelief that I can't find one already, but is there any rom like this? Or is anyone homebuilding a rom like this?
please keep any anti-linaro speak to oneself.
Sent from my Nexus 5
notbrodie said:
I'm in disbelief that I can't find one already, but is there any rom like this? Or is anyone homebuilding a rom like this?
please keep any anti-linaro speak to oneself.
Sent from my Nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what you are asking is someone to compile aosp with a buzzword, and thats all. using the linaro toolchain will not increase your performance. the google toolchain has in it everything that the linaro toolchain includes, plus more. and im not talking anti linaro, im talking reality. all you are asking for is a buzzword. for that no one will waste their time.
notbrodie said:
I'm in disbelief that I can't find one already, but is there any rom like this? Or is anyone homebuilding a rom like this?
please keep any anti-linaro speak to oneself.
Sent from my Nexus 5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2593028
Close as you're going to get without building your own.
I will also go on the assumption that you didn't check either of the development sub-forums before posting your request...
heres a pure aosp build, not compiled with linaro though http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/?rom=rastakat&device=hammerhead-vanilla
Hi,
Maybe this one "LinaroDroid": http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=47702472, based on AOSP, there is no features/mods...
Sent from my LG-D802 using xda premium
viking37 said:
Hi,
Maybe this one "LinaroDroid": http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=47702472, based on AOSP, there is no features/mods...
Sent from my LG-D802 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks. i had looked at that one and noticed that he had said something about implementing navbar customization. i might just try to use rascarlo's vanilla AOSP source that @simms22 linked and compile it myself.
Ah, ok... it's up to you :thumbup:
I had tested a build (not the last but the previous one if I remember right) and there were no navigation bar settings nor other features, it looks like stock. But right it seems planned in the OP...
Sent from my LG-D802 using xda premium
Hi Folks,
Maybe it´s a silly questions, but are there other non-Stock ROMs that CM-based available for our Moto G?
All other Custom ROMs are somehow based on or related to CM, or?
Am I right? Can somebody bring some light to my dark brain?
THX
There are other roms that aren't stock nor based in CM. The paranoid (PA) and the AOSP are examples.
#Delete18 said:
There are other roms that aren't stock nor based in CM. The paranoid (PA) and the AOSP are examples.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PA is not an example, it uses the CM sources for our device. In fact, the builds we get - AOSPAL - are all based on CM's device specific repos and only use the frameworks and settings from PA.
AOSP is only ROM not based on CM.
To answer the OP, no there are no other type of ROMs for our device as of now. Either the ROM is based on CM or on Stock. We also have a firefox OS port, but that is also based on CM sources.
andogeek10 said:
PA is not an example, it uses the CM sources for our device. In fact, the builds we get - AOSPAL - are all based on CM's device specific repos and only use the frameworks and settings from PA.
AOSP is only ROM not based on CM.
To answer the OP, no there are no other type of ROMs for our device as of now. Either the ROM is based on CM or on Stock. We also have a firefox OS port, but that is also based on CM sources.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you. Now I'm a little smarter.
andogeek10 said:
PA is not an example, it uses the CM sources for our device. In fact, the builds we get - AOSPAL - are all based on CM's device specific repos and only use the frameworks and settings from PA.
AOSP is only ROM not based on CM.
To answer the OP, no there are no other type of ROMs for our device as of now. Either the ROM is based on CM or on Stock. We also have a firefox OS port, but that is also based on CM sources.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry, but I believe that the Paranoid is not more based on CM, but on AOSP. Please, view the change log of ROM. :good:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2583582
#Delete18 said:
I'm sorry, but I believe that the Paranoid is not more based on CM, but on AOSP. Please, view the change log of ROM. :good:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2583582
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only the nexus devices have PA based on AOSP. Our device is supported by AOSPA legacy ( use device repos from cm and are therefore called legacy).
If you don't believe me, check the github of AOSPA legacy.
Sent from my Moto G using Tapatalk
andogeek10 said:
Only the nexus devices have PA based on AOSP. Our device is supported by AOSPA legacy ( use device repos from cm and are therefore called legacy).
If you don't believe me, check the github of AOSPA legacy.
Sent from my Moto G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for explanation.
andogeek10 said:
To answer the OP, no there are no other type of ROMs for our device as of now. Either the ROM is based on CM or on Stock. We also have a firefox OS port, but that is also based on CM sources.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Slim and OmniRom isn't based on CM, or is it?
HeisehKiiN said:
Slim and OmniRom isn't based on CM, or is it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They're both derived from CM device trees.
I like AOSP ROM, but i'm not sure if there any ROM yet.
¿Liquid? ¿SlimSaber?
Thnx for reply.
SergioPC92 said:
I like AOSP ROM, but i'm not sure if there any ROM yet.
¿Liquid? ¿SlimSaber?
Thnx for reply.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are a lot of them. Look in both Development sections for 5.0 in the title. Vanir is probably the most stable and bug free right now > http://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-one/orig-development/official-vaniraosp-t2890749
Vanir is AOSP based?
VanirAosp is Very stable
---------- Post added at 02:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:16 PM ----------
SergioPC92 said:
Vanir is AOSP based?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's cyanogenmod based
Mmm thanks, and any AOSP based ROM? Lolipop? Anything?
SergioPC92 said:
Mmm thanks, and any AOSP based ROM? Lolipop? Anything?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CyanogenMod is AOSP. Vanir (AOSP) is indistinguishable from vanilla AOSP.
cam30era said:
CyanogenMod is AOSP. Vanir (AOSP) is indistinguishable from vanilla AOSP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM is not AOSP
bombadier said:
CM is not AOSP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh? When did CyanogenMod stop basing their ROMs on AOSP?
cam30era said:
Oh? When did CyanogenMod stop basing their ROMs on AOSP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its different they get the sources and do cm stuff to them,generally you will get kernels that are for AOSP or CM based ROMS as a result
bombadier said:
Its different they get the sources and do cm stuff to them,generally you will get kernels that are for AOSP or CM based ROMS as a result
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm currently running Vanir ROM. It is indistinguishable from vanilla AOSP (on my Moto X). And for most users, the current iterations of CM12 are so lightly customized that they are, for all intents and purposes unadulterated AOSP too.
I suppose if one wants to split hairs, one could make the argument that these aren't pure AOSP. Then one would have to head over to the OnePlus forum and flash the new , very buggy 5.0 ROM (Not!).
cam30era said:
I'm currently running Vanir ROM. It is indistinguishable from vanilla AOSP (on my Moto X). And for most users, the current iterations of CM12 are so lightly customized that they are, for all intents and purposes unadulterated AOSP too.
I suppose if one wants to split hairs, one could make the argument that these aren't pure AOSP. Then one would have to head over to the OnePlus forum and flash the new , very buggy 5.0 ROM (Not!).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Best to stay away from the opo forums for the serious stuff, the point I was making was just that you have either AOSP or CM and then everything comes from there really,
You need to be aware as you can have serious problems if you flash the wrong type of kernel, I came from a nexus so for me there was quite an important difference and had to watch what version you flashed,amazed actually at how slow development has been with lollipop, as you say a lot of work needed to find one with some customisations,will stick to kikkat till an offiical lollipop S version appears for the bacon
Best lolipop rom
TO me http://forum.xda-developers.com/one...m-bliss-stalk-team-bliss-bacon-10-28-t2921057
this is the best lolipop rom for onepluso ne buddy
Q&A for [ROM][4.4.4][OFFICIAL] CM-11.0 for tf300t
Some developers prefer that questions remain separate from their main development thread to help keep things organized. Placing your question within this thread will increase its chances of being answered by a member of the community or by the developer.
Before posting, please use the forum search and read through the discussion thread for [ROM][4.4.4][OFFICIAL] CM-11.0 for tf300t. If you can't find an answer, post it here, being sure to give as much information as possible (firmware version, steps to reproduce, logcat if available) so that you can get help.
Thanks for understanding and for helping to keep XDA neat and tidy!
T300T CM11.0 nightlies?
Is it just me, or are all of the CM11 nightlies gone?
Some of the CM12 nightlies as well. Are there any mirrors?
Anyone have any CM11 roms where the Cast Screen function actually works?
shdware said:
Is it just me, or are all of the CM11 nightlies gone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you're not alone, as posted in another thread i cant find cm11 nightly for tf300t anymore everywhere!
i need to downgrade to cm11 from a dirty install of one of the last cm12 nightly but i wonder how can i if official cyano repo doesnt work...
so, if anybody can put somewhere the cm-11-20150105-NIGHTLY-tf300t.zip i really appreciate it!
CM11.0 4.4.4 dead?
It looks like all of the nightlies are gone.
I'm looking for a KitKat rom that allows:
- overclocking
- a working 'cast screen' function
- stability!
Are there any? It doesn't look like Lollipop is ready yet for a daily driver.
shdware said:
It looks like all of the nightlies are gone.
I'm looking for a KitKat rom that allows:
- overclocking
- a working 'cast screen' function
- stability!
Are there any? It doesn't look like Lollipop is ready yet for a daily driver.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclocking is generally a kernel feature; try grimlock, geass, katkernel, or _that kernels with any KK ROM for overclocking. I was running a KK PacROM which was quite stable prior to switching to LP. Try KatKiss for a great LP ROM. I don't use cast screen so I can't help with that.
shawnbrennan55 said:
Overclocking is generally a kernel feature; try grimlock, geass, katkernel, or _that kernels with any KK ROM for overclocking. I was running a KK PacROM which was quite stable prior to switching to LP. Try KatKiss for a great LP ROM. I don't use cast screen so I can't help with that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm still fairly new to this and wasn't aware that you could install a ROM with a different kernel; I'm used to just flashing and taking whatever is in the package.
Is there a more comprehensive guide on how to do this exactly? I'm enjoying the speed boost from the Zombi ROM which uses Grimlock's kernel, but when the docking station is plugged in the touchscreen is all over the place, so this isn't going to work for me.
OMNIrom seems to be updated fairly regularly and the docking station did pretty well, but I was locked into a stock speed.
shdware said:
I'm still fairly new to this and wasn't aware that you could install a ROM with a different kernel; I'm used to just flashing and taking whatever is in the package.
Is there a more comprehensive guide on how to do this exactly? I'm enjoying the speed boost from the Zombi ROM which uses Grimlock's kernel, but when the docking station is plugged in the touchscreen is all over the place, so this isn't going to work for me.
OMNIrom seems to be updated fairly regularly and the docking station did pretty well, but I was locked into a stock speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just flash the kernel zip file from recovery, wipe cache/dalvik, then reboot. On LP you can skip the wipe cache/dalvic step.
Stable version?
Does anybody know when a stable version of CM 11 will be published? I'm still on CM 10 and a bit cautious with upgrading the tablet.
ViseMoD said:
Does anybody know when a stable version of CM 11 will be published? I'm still on CM 10 and a bit cautious with upgrading the tablet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Forget CM11. KatKiss 5.1 is beautiful. I've got it running on my TF300T and a TF700 with a custom kernel.
It's faster than CM11. Try it - you won't regret it.
Google Play Store and me301t with Cyanogen 11
Hello,
i have installed UNOFFICIAL][4.4.4] Cyanogenmod 11.0. I have no playstore. In this thread there is a link but all answer are deleted. When can i find this file for my me 301t?
Thanks you!!
falcoman33 said:
Hello,
i have installed UNOFFICIAL][4.4.4] Cyanogenmod 11.0. I have no playstore. In this thread there is a link but all answer are deleted. When can i find this file for my me 301t?
Thanks you!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CyanogenMod never comes with Play or other Google apps. Flash a GAPPS package of your preference.
Sent from Google Nexus 4 @ CM12.1
[WARNING: XDA Premium 4.0.13+ lacks Signature function - do not update]
official and unofficial cm 11, that is the question?
excuse me again.... i have installed unofficial cm 11.0. What is the difference between official and unofficial.
do you think it would be better if i install official?
thanks you
curently i have 11-20141024-unofficial-me301t
is it the best version in cm11?
.
AndyYan said:
CyanogenMod never comes with Play or other Google apps. Flash a GAPPS package of your preference.
Sent from Google Nexus 4 @ CM12.1
[WARNING: XDA Premium 4.0.13+ lacks Signature function - do not update]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
falcoman33 said:
excuse me again.... i have installed unofficial cm 11.0. What is the difference between official and unofficial.
do you think it would be better if i install official?
thanks you
curently i have 11-20141024-unofficial-me301t
is it the best version in cm11?
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's no official version for ME301T, so keep what you have, unless you find a version that's more up-to-date. The latest CM11 I can find for TF300T is 20150112.
Sent from Google Nexus 4 @ CM12.1
[WARNING: XDA Premium 4.0.13+ lacks Signature function - do not update]
Hi there people,
I'm thinking of trying SlimRom and I was just wondering many roms say "AOSP" and actually are CM based(which is AOSP afaik), is the SlimRom cm based or AOSP in it's pure form?
I'd like to try some AOSP roms(not based on CM)
P.S. If you know other roms with reduced size feel free to share
evronetwork said:
Hi there people,
I'm thinking of trying SlimRom and I was just wondering many roms say "AOSP" and actually are CM based(which is AOSP afaik), is the SlimRom cm based or AOSP in it's pure form?
I'd like to try some AOSP roms(not based on CM)
P.S. If you know other roms with reduced size feel free to share
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SlimRom kernel is CM based. But it has to look and feel of AOSP. The only OPO ROM that I'm aware of that does not use a CM based kernel is Omni.
cam30era said:
SlimRom kernel is CM based. But it has to look and feel of AOSP. The only OPO ROM that I'm aware of that does not use a CM based kernel is Omni.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rom talking, almost all AOSP roms use CM code... which doesn't mean they are entirely CM based. Afaik, Slim and AOSPA (and other projects) take many things from CM source but they keep their own line of developement, and in some aspects they diverge a lot. But in all cases, they use (as you stated) CM kernel base. Omni is the only one that's truly independent from cyanogen (rom & kernel), I think. Plus, you now got our manufacturer working on a pure AOSP rom, but I'm unsure if cyanogen did that or Oppo.
fermasia said:
Rom talking, almost all AOSP roms use CM code... which doesn't mean they are entirely CM based. Afaik, Slim and AOSPA (and other projects) take many things from CM source but they keep their own line of developement, and in some aspects they diverge a lot. But in all cases, they use (as you stated) CM kernel base. Omni is the only one that's truly independent from cyanogen (rom & kernel), I think. Plus, you now got our manufacturer working on a pure AOSP rom, but I'm unsure if cyanogen did that or Oppo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why oppo or cm, can't be independed? ..I'd like an pure AOSP rom (stable) and right now it's far from stable
evronetwork said:
Why oppo or cm, can't be independed? ..I'd like an pure AOSP rom (stable) and right now it's far from stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried SlimLP? If not, you should. It's my daily driver and rock solid for me.
fermasia said:
.....Plus, you now got our manufacturer working on a pure AOSP rom, but I'm unsure if cyanogen did that or Oppo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a project by OnePlus themselves.
Transmitted via Bacon
---------- Post added at 06:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:32 AM ----------
evronetwork said:
Why oppo or cm, can't be independed? ..I'd like an pure AOSP rom (stable) and right now it's far from stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're gonna have to be patient then. Or just try Slim, it may use the CM kernel but you're not going to notice that at all because kernel operations take place on a lower level behind the scenes.
Transmitted via Bacon
cam30era said:
Have you tried SlimLP? If not, you should. It's my daily driver and rock solid for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll try SlimLP but when it's ready, right now I see only unofficial nightlies..
When I had DHD I was willing to try every possible combo in order to get just a little bit better performance but since now this isn't the issue I prefer something stable, even 44S I'm on isn't stable enough for me.
---------------------
timmaaa said:
That's a project by OnePlus themselves.
Transmitted via Bacon
---------- Post added at 06:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:32 AM ----------
You're gonna have to be patient then. Or just try Slim, it may use the CM kernel but you're not going to notice that at all because kernel operations take place on a lower level behind the scenes.
Transmitted via Bacon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Although not very good at programming, I did had my fair share of it when finished my undergraduate program, I know what a kernel is and what it does
evronetwork said:
Although not very good at programming, I did had my fair share of it when finished my undergraduate program, I know what a kernel is and what it does
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool, not everyone does so just making sure I give information to suit that potential situation.
Think there is a pure aosp ROM in the forums?
timmaaa said:
Cool, not everyone does so just making sure I give information to suit that potential situation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a BSc(Hons) Computing degree heh, but good thought of informing ppl
evertking said:
Think there is a pure aosp ROM in the forums?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pure AOSP not based on CM? care to shed a light on this? (or you think there isn't any.. you got me confused )
evronetwork said:
Pure AOSP not based on CM? care to shed a light on this? (or you think there isn't any.. you got me confused )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's pure aosp, developed by OnePlus and altered a little by the guy that posted it. It's in the dev section.
timmaaa said:
It's pure aosp, developed by OnePlus and altered a little by the guy that posted it. It's in the dev section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are referring about AOSP by OnePlus ..man still at alpha stage WAY too buggy for my taste, maybe when it's stable I'll try it.
Although here on xda some created patches and bugfixes but still I'm looking for rock-solid stability, I have speed(compared to my old and previous DHD) so I'm not seeking on testing 10 roms per week as I did in the past
evronetwork said:
You are referring about AOSP by OnePlus ..man still at alpha stage WAY too buggy for my taste, maybe when it's stable I'll try it.
Although here on xda some created patches and bugfixes but still I'm looking for rock-solid stability, I have speed(compared to my old and previous DHD) so I'm not seeking on testing 10 roms per week as I did in the past
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree 100%, but you asked for aosp ROMs and that's it.
Transmitted via Bacon
timmaaa said:
I agree 100%, but you asked for aosp ROMs and that's it.
Transmitted via Bacon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just asked in case I was unaware of something, my field is computers in general and I might lack in android and surely don't know everything about it
Too bad vanilla android isn't around for every phone(nexus style roms), just bare bone android with proper drivers in it - that would be fast ...and slim
P.S. I'll try slimlp when it's out I guess(officially), thank you guys for all ur answers - Fact, it might take a while..I expect 1+1 to deliver rom sometime in late feb(or early feb with bugs ..depends) after that in March or May I should expect SlimLP ..don't take my word I'm wild guessing
evronetwork said:
I just asked in case I was unaware of something, my field is computers in general and I might lack in android and surely don't know everything about it
Too bad vanilla android isn't around for every phone(nexus style roms), just bare bone android with proper drivers in it - that would be fast ...and slim
P.S. I'll try slimlp when it's out I guess(officially), thank you guys for all ur answers - Fact, it might take a while..I expect 1+1 to deliver rom sometime in late feb(or early feb with bugs ..depends) after that in March or May I should expect SlimLP ..don't take my word I'm wild guessing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SlimLP is official for this device. Even if it wasn't it really doesn't matter, it's built from the proper source.
Transmitted via Bacon
timmaaa said:
SlimLP is official for this device. Even if it wasn't it really doesn't matter, it's built from the proper source.
Transmitted via Bacon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to their website, latest slim rom is SlimKat(kit kat)
http://www.slimroms.net/index.php/downloads/dlsearch/viewcategory/1281-bacon
I see no official SlimLP for our 1+1, not just yet(many unofficial ones exist ..I know)
evronetwork said:
According to their website, latest slim rom is SlimKat(kit kat)
http://www.slimroms.net/index.php/downloads/dlsearch/viewcategory/1281-bacon
I see no official SlimLP for our 1+1, not just yet(many unofficial ones exist ..I know)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought Robbie's was official, guess I was wrong. Like I said though, it really doesn't make a lick of difference, it's still built from Slim source, the One and only difference is that it's missing the official tag in the title, that's it. People all too often mistake that tag to actually mean something, it doesn't.
Transmitted via Bacon
timmaaa said:
I thought Robbie's was official, guess I was wrong. Like I said though, it really doesn't make a lick of difference, it's still built from Slim source, the One and only difference is that it's missing the official tag in the title, that's it. People all too often mistake that tag to actually mean something, it doesn't.
Transmitted via Bacon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1+1 has already many bugs in it's latest 44S I really don't want anymore even if it's a glitched icon, a minor issue or something that most people don't care about. I see "official" as a "we've test it more than just flash it and leave it for a couple of days"
I mean you know 1+1 has issue when 3rd party camera app is installed and you try to use flash on low light enviroment right? it's probably a driver issue although FV-5 app fix this(workaround), stock camera doesn't have that bug. So in SlimLP if I use the camera does this occur in a 3rd party camera app? ..this should be solved when CM12s hits the market, dunno if it's fixed in the not so official SlimLP
I guess I better back up and try it.. what I have to lose except some time? (I did flash with my previous DHD even 5-6 times per day)
evronetwork said:
I see "official" as a "we've test it more than just flash it and leave it for a couple of days"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Official definitely doesn't mean that. Take CM for example, it's done by a buildbot, no testing at all, and that's completely official. I'd take Robbie's builds over an official release any day of the week. That's what I'm saying, the perception that official is better is completely false.
Transmitted via Bacon
timmaaa said:
Official definitely doesn't mean that. Take CM for example, it's done by a buildbot, no testing at all, and that's completely official. I'd take Robbie's builds over an official release any day of the week. That's what I'm saying, the perception that official is better is completely false.
Transmitted via Bacon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM is the worst example as even cm official builds are buggy sometimes(no proper testing and I'm talking about stable released not nightlies, the guy who build the cm camera app in the past had a long post mention it - nice guy)
I did an EFS backup, did a nandroid backup and doing currently mybackup backup(I use this for apps/contacts since android 2.3.6)