Hi there people,
I'm thinking of trying SlimRom and I was just wondering many roms say "AOSP" and actually are CM based(which is AOSP afaik), is the SlimRom cm based or AOSP in it's pure form?
I'd like to try some AOSP roms(not based on CM)
P.S. If you know other roms with reduced size feel free to share
evronetwork said:
Hi there people,
I'm thinking of trying SlimRom and I was just wondering many roms say "AOSP" and actually are CM based(which is AOSP afaik), is the SlimRom cm based or AOSP in it's pure form?
I'd like to try some AOSP roms(not based on CM)
P.S. If you know other roms with reduced size feel free to share
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SlimRom kernel is CM based. But it has to look and feel of AOSP. The only OPO ROM that I'm aware of that does not use a CM based kernel is Omni.
cam30era said:
SlimRom kernel is CM based. But it has to look and feel of AOSP. The only OPO ROM that I'm aware of that does not use a CM based kernel is Omni.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rom talking, almost all AOSP roms use CM code... which doesn't mean they are entirely CM based. Afaik, Slim and AOSPA (and other projects) take many things from CM source but they keep their own line of developement, and in some aspects they diverge a lot. But in all cases, they use (as you stated) CM kernel base. Omni is the only one that's truly independent from cyanogen (rom & kernel), I think. Plus, you now got our manufacturer working on a pure AOSP rom, but I'm unsure if cyanogen did that or Oppo.
fermasia said:
Rom talking, almost all AOSP roms use CM code... which doesn't mean they are entirely CM based. Afaik, Slim and AOSPA (and other projects) take many things from CM source but they keep their own line of developement, and in some aspects they diverge a lot. But in all cases, they use (as you stated) CM kernel base. Omni is the only one that's truly independent from cyanogen (rom & kernel), I think. Plus, you now got our manufacturer working on a pure AOSP rom, but I'm unsure if cyanogen did that or Oppo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why oppo or cm, can't be independed? ..I'd like an pure AOSP rom (stable) and right now it's far from stable
evronetwork said:
Why oppo or cm, can't be independed? ..I'd like an pure AOSP rom (stable) and right now it's far from stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried SlimLP? If not, you should. It's my daily driver and rock solid for me.
fermasia said:
.....Plus, you now got our manufacturer working on a pure AOSP rom, but I'm unsure if cyanogen did that or Oppo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a project by OnePlus themselves.
Transmitted via Bacon
---------- Post added at 06:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:32 AM ----------
evronetwork said:
Why oppo or cm, can't be independed? ..I'd like an pure AOSP rom (stable) and right now it's far from stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're gonna have to be patient then. Or just try Slim, it may use the CM kernel but you're not going to notice that at all because kernel operations take place on a lower level behind the scenes.
Transmitted via Bacon
cam30era said:
Have you tried SlimLP? If not, you should. It's my daily driver and rock solid for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll try SlimLP but when it's ready, right now I see only unofficial nightlies..
When I had DHD I was willing to try every possible combo in order to get just a little bit better performance but since now this isn't the issue I prefer something stable, even 44S I'm on isn't stable enough for me.
---------------------
timmaaa said:
That's a project by OnePlus themselves.
Transmitted via Bacon
---------- Post added at 06:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:32 AM ----------
You're gonna have to be patient then. Or just try Slim, it may use the CM kernel but you're not going to notice that at all because kernel operations take place on a lower level behind the scenes.
Transmitted via Bacon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Although not very good at programming, I did had my fair share of it when finished my undergraduate program, I know what a kernel is and what it does
evronetwork said:
Although not very good at programming, I did had my fair share of it when finished my undergraduate program, I know what a kernel is and what it does
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool, not everyone does so just making sure I give information to suit that potential situation.
Think there is a pure aosp ROM in the forums?
timmaaa said:
Cool, not everyone does so just making sure I give information to suit that potential situation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a BSc(Hons) Computing degree heh, but good thought of informing ppl
evertking said:
Think there is a pure aosp ROM in the forums?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pure AOSP not based on CM? care to shed a light on this? (or you think there isn't any.. you got me confused )
evronetwork said:
Pure AOSP not based on CM? care to shed a light on this? (or you think there isn't any.. you got me confused )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's pure aosp, developed by OnePlus and altered a little by the guy that posted it. It's in the dev section.
timmaaa said:
It's pure aosp, developed by OnePlus and altered a little by the guy that posted it. It's in the dev section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are referring about AOSP by OnePlus ..man still at alpha stage WAY too buggy for my taste, maybe when it's stable I'll try it.
Although here on xda some created patches and bugfixes but still I'm looking for rock-solid stability, I have speed(compared to my old and previous DHD) so I'm not seeking on testing 10 roms per week as I did in the past
evronetwork said:
You are referring about AOSP by OnePlus ..man still at alpha stage WAY too buggy for my taste, maybe when it's stable I'll try it.
Although here on xda some created patches and bugfixes but still I'm looking for rock-solid stability, I have speed(compared to my old and previous DHD) so I'm not seeking on testing 10 roms per week as I did in the past
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree 100%, but you asked for aosp ROMs and that's it.
Transmitted via Bacon
timmaaa said:
I agree 100%, but you asked for aosp ROMs and that's it.
Transmitted via Bacon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just asked in case I was unaware of something, my field is computers in general and I might lack in android and surely don't know everything about it
Too bad vanilla android isn't around for every phone(nexus style roms), just bare bone android with proper drivers in it - that would be fast ...and slim
P.S. I'll try slimlp when it's out I guess(officially), thank you guys for all ur answers - Fact, it might take a while..I expect 1+1 to deliver rom sometime in late feb(or early feb with bugs ..depends) after that in March or May I should expect SlimLP ..don't take my word I'm wild guessing
evronetwork said:
I just asked in case I was unaware of something, my field is computers in general and I might lack in android and surely don't know everything about it
Too bad vanilla android isn't around for every phone(nexus style roms), just bare bone android with proper drivers in it - that would be fast ...and slim
P.S. I'll try slimlp when it's out I guess(officially), thank you guys for all ur answers - Fact, it might take a while..I expect 1+1 to deliver rom sometime in late feb(or early feb with bugs ..depends) after that in March or May I should expect SlimLP ..don't take my word I'm wild guessing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SlimLP is official for this device. Even if it wasn't it really doesn't matter, it's built from the proper source.
Transmitted via Bacon
timmaaa said:
SlimLP is official for this device. Even if it wasn't it really doesn't matter, it's built from the proper source.
Transmitted via Bacon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to their website, latest slim rom is SlimKat(kit kat)
http://www.slimroms.net/index.php/downloads/dlsearch/viewcategory/1281-bacon
I see no official SlimLP for our 1+1, not just yet(many unofficial ones exist ..I know)
evronetwork said:
According to their website, latest slim rom is SlimKat(kit kat)
http://www.slimroms.net/index.php/downloads/dlsearch/viewcategory/1281-bacon
I see no official SlimLP for our 1+1, not just yet(many unofficial ones exist ..I know)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought Robbie's was official, guess I was wrong. Like I said though, it really doesn't make a lick of difference, it's still built from Slim source, the One and only difference is that it's missing the official tag in the title, that's it. People all too often mistake that tag to actually mean something, it doesn't.
Transmitted via Bacon
timmaaa said:
I thought Robbie's was official, guess I was wrong. Like I said though, it really doesn't make a lick of difference, it's still built from Slim source, the One and only difference is that it's missing the official tag in the title, that's it. People all too often mistake that tag to actually mean something, it doesn't.
Transmitted via Bacon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1+1 has already many bugs in it's latest 44S I really don't want anymore even if it's a glitched icon, a minor issue or something that most people don't care about. I see "official" as a "we've test it more than just flash it and leave it for a couple of days"
I mean you know 1+1 has issue when 3rd party camera app is installed and you try to use flash on low light enviroment right? it's probably a driver issue although FV-5 app fix this(workaround), stock camera doesn't have that bug. So in SlimLP if I use the camera does this occur in a 3rd party camera app? ..this should be solved when CM12s hits the market, dunno if it's fixed in the not so official SlimLP
I guess I better back up and try it.. what I have to lose except some time? (I did flash with my previous DHD even 5-6 times per day)
evronetwork said:
I see "official" as a "we've test it more than just flash it and leave it for a couple of days"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Official definitely doesn't mean that. Take CM for example, it's done by a buildbot, no testing at all, and that's completely official. I'd take Robbie's builds over an official release any day of the week. That's what I'm saying, the perception that official is better is completely false.
Transmitted via Bacon
timmaaa said:
Official definitely doesn't mean that. Take CM for example, it's done by a buildbot, no testing at all, and that's completely official. I'd take Robbie's builds over an official release any day of the week. That's what I'm saying, the perception that official is better is completely false.
Transmitted via Bacon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM is the worst example as even cm official builds are buggy sometimes(no proper testing and I'm talking about stable released not nightlies, the guy who build the cm camera app in the past had a long post mention it - nice guy)
I did an EFS backup, did a nandroid backup and doing currently mybackup backup(I use this for apps/contacts since android 2.3.6)
Related
Hey guys,
So I really want to get an AOSP rom but seems whenever i go to one i have problems. I tried LiquidSmooth R2 last night and had problems(LED light not working for SMS).
What would you recommend? I keep seeing CM10.1 but theres so many unofficial builds that i dont know which to go with. I just want stability which i know is a big thing ha. Any suggestions?
ponzi314 said:
Hey guys,
So I really want to get an AOSP rom but seems whenever i go to one i have problems. I tried LiquidSmooth R2 last night and had problems(LED light not working for SMS).
What would you recommend? I keep seeing CM10.1 but theres so many unofficial builds that i dont know which to go with. I just want stability which i know is a big thing ha. Any suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It honestly depends on what you want in a ROM as what works for me won't be good for you. Right now am running the Avatar ROM which is CM 10.1 with MIUI themes which is stable for me but like all ROMs you might not have the same experience.
Stable
Official cyanogenmods are usually stable. You can look on their site to find their downloads if you're confused by the unofficia; vs official. Other than that as was previously stated, test out the rom (I usually give the rom a week to see what issues may be present) and use that to determine features you may like. If you want recommendations on roms I would say AOSPA (Paranoid Android), AOKP, Cyanogenmod, carbon rom, rootbox, liquidsmooth(but you already used that), Blackbean(You can try 7, but 8 is on the way), and that's pretty much it, also don't completely turn away from unofficial builds yet. Read the forums and find out about them a little. I've been running an unofficial rootbox with cherrypicks for the last two weeks and it is rock solid for example. Hopefully this helps you out with you decision. Have fun and happy flashing
---------- Post added at 08:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:43 PM ----------
jmxc23 said:
It honestly depends on what you want in a ROM as what works for me won't be good for you. Right now am running the Avatar ROM which is CM 10.1 with MIUI themes which is stable for me but like all ROMs you might not have the same experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just have to say that rom looks awesome. gonna have to try it :good:
Slimbeans has been very stable for me.
ponzi314 said:
Hey guys,
So I really want to get an AOSP rom but seems whenever i go to one i have problems. I tried LiquidSmooth R2 last night and had problems(LED light not working for SMS).
What would you recommend? I keep seeing CM10.1 but theres so many unofficial builds that i dont know which to go with. I just want stability which i know is a big thing ha. Any suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Liquid works the best for me, great combination of stability and speed. It's also extremely smooth
saintsantos said:
Official cyanogenmods are usually stable. You can look on their site to find their downloads if you're confused by the unofficia; vs official. Other than that as was previously stated, test out the rom (I usually give the rom a week to see what issues may be present) and use that to determine features you may like. If you want recommendations on roms I would say AOSPA (Paranoid Android), AOKP, Cyanogenmod, carbon rom, rootbox, liquidsmooth(but you already used that), Blackbean(You can try 7, but 8 is on the way), and that's pretty much it, also don't completely turn away from unofficial builds yet. Read the forums and find out about them a little. I've been running an unofficial rootbox with cherrypicks for the last two weeks and it is rock solid for example. Hopefully this helps you out with you decision. Have fun and happy flashing
I might have to try Paranoid Android. I want just something that works for everyday when i tried CM10.1 but the bluetooth streaming wasnt working
---------- Post added at 08:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:43 PM ----------
I just have to say that rom looks awesome. gonna have to try it :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lvgdgts said:
Slimbeans has been very stable for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never tried this. is it better then Paranoid?
mcdevil58 said:
Liquid works the best for me, great combination of stability and speed. It's also extremely smooth
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Liquid the SMS led wasnt working!! thats my only problem
theyre all stable. pick the one that works best for you.
only you can answer this question.
ponzi314 said:
Never tried this. is it better then Paranoid?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't tried Paranoid. I can say that Slimbeans is very stable, fast and beautifully constructed. You really won't find any problems that don't exist in the 4.22 ROMs, as a whole.
lvgdgts said:
I haven't tried Paranoid. I can say that Slimbeans is very stable, fast and beautifully constructed. You really won't find any problems that don't exist in the 4.22 ROMs, as a whole.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just flashed slimbeans earlier and it already locked up one me once. Should i just go back to 4.2.1?
ponzi314 said:
Just flashed slimbeans earlier and it already locked up one me once. Should i just go back to 4.2.1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what I'm gathering in the forums, the stable release if Liquid is coming... Soon... Rejoice and be glad of it.
For me AOKP and Eclipse were the most stable. So it depends on your phone n your setup also preferences
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Why is the Cyanogen team putting more focus on CM11 unopposed to CM11s which is supposed to be their unique software for the Oneplus One? They even rolled out a Nexus-esque rom just yesterday.
This move doesn't make sense to me from a marketing standpoint. One would think the best way for them to go is to make sure CM11s is bug free and then focus on CM11 or whatever else.
THIS IS NOT A RANT. I'm literally confused so please keep all negative comments to yourself.
Sent from my One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I would think it's because CM11 is on more devices (many more) than CM11S
there's only 1 phone that runs CM11S, where as almost every other phone has a build of CM11. There are even CM11 nightlies for the OPO if you would rather use that.
why would they focus all their efforts on one specific phone? THAT would not make good sense.
CM11S is meant to be a finished product. There will be stable finished builds in the future, but no nightlies.
FuNKSioN said:
there's only 1 phone that runs CM11S, where as almost every other phone has a build of CM11. There are even CM11 nightlies for the OPO if you would rather use that.
why would they focus all their efforts on one specific phone? THAT would not make good sense.
CM11S is meant to be a finished product. There will be stable finished builds in the future, but no nightlies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From the Amount of bugs I can assure you that CM11s is far from finished.
I'm getting a better experience with CM11 + CM11S Apps. I'd recommend that.
FuNKSioN said:
there's only 1 phone that runs CM11S, where as almost every other phone has a build of CM11. There are even CM11 nightlies for the OPO if you would rather use that.
why would they focus all their efforts on one specific phone? THAT would not make good sense.
CM11S is meant to be a finished product. There will be stable finished builds in the future, but no nightlies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know it is meant to be a finished product, that's why I'm confused as to why they are still pushing the Nightlies so hard. Shouldn't CM11S be their main focus especially since this is their flagship?
Also isn't CM11 almost the same as CM11s except for subtle visual changes like the lock screen, etc? I would of thought that Cyanogen would of at least did CM11s nightlies.
Sent from my One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
drakester09 said:
From the Amount of bugs I can assure you that CM11s is far from finished.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess "finished" was the wrong word. what I meant was "stable ready for release". as in, no nightlies, snapshots, milestones, etc..
---------- Post added at 10:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:41 AM ----------
OuncE718 said:
I know it is meant to be a finished product, that's why I'm confused as to why they are still pushing the Nightlies so hard. Shouldn't CM11S be their main focus especially since this is their flagship?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nightlies are simply made available. they aren't pushing anything. the code base is compiled on a "nightly" schedule, and if anyone wants it they can go get it.
CM11S is by no means a flagship for Cyanogenmod in any way. its just a version they compiled for the OPO. The OPO was meant to be the first marketable consumer phone running stock CM. No company anywhere is making "nightlies" available for consumer products.
OuncE718 said:
Also isn't CM11 almost the same as CM11s except for subtle visual changes like the lock screen, etc? I would of thought that Cyanogen would of at least did CM11s nightlies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is there something specific in a newer nightly that you want on your OPO, or do you just want "whatever is the newest I can get my hands on"? if that's the case, you can easily switch over to a CM nightly.
FuNKSioN said:
I guess "finished" was the wrong word. what I meant was "stable ready for release". as in, no nightlies, snapshots, milestones, etc..
---------- Post added at 10:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:41 AM ----------
nightlies are simply made available. they aren't pushing anything. the code base is compiled on a "nightly" schedule, and if anyone wants it they can go get it.
CM11S is by no means a flagship for Cyanogenmod in any way. its just a version they compiled for the OPO. The OPO was meant to be the first marketable consumer phone running stock CM. No company anywhere is making "nightlies" available for consumer products.
is there something specific in a newer nightly that you want on your OPO, or do you just want "whatever is the newest I can get my hands on"? if that's the case, you can easily switch over to a CM nightly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what I've read the Nightlies are more stable than CM11s. What I would definitely want is the stability. There is too many bugs on the stock ROM but at the same time I don't want to have to flash a custom ROM to get stability.
I do understand that this phone isn't officially released yet so I am grateful for beta testing the software.
Sent from my One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
They are the same thing. Cm11 has nightly builds that are for every device where features are added and bugs are fixed. They are not considered stable. There are also monthly milestone builds which are considered somewhat stable. Cm11s is based on milestone builds with added proprietary code. You should see cm11s updates no sooner than every two weeks and no later than ever month. Any sooner would be annoying.
Cyanogen and OnePlus are not the same company. OnePlus made a stock android ROM based on source code to get people to shut up about making gpe phone. It's not Google certified so it doesn't include Google services or the play store. It's not signed by cyanogen so it doesn't flash with out unlocking the bootloader and using a different recovery.
Sent from my TouchPad using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
The Jack of Clubs said:
They are the same thing. Cm11 has nightly builds that are for every device where features are added and bugs are fixed. They are not considered stable. There are also monthly milestone builds which are considered somewhat stable. Cm11s is based on milestone builds with added proprietary code. You should see cm11s updates no sooner than every two weeks and no later than ever month. Any sooner would be annoying.
Cyanogen and OnePlus are not the same company. OnePlus made a stock android ROM based on source code to get people to shut up about making gpe phone. It's not Google certified so it doesn't include Google services or the play store. It's not signed by cyanogen so it doesn't flash with out unlocking the bootloader and using a different recovery.
Sent from my TouchPad using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't need to be certified by Google, its treated as a custom ROM and is not officially supported by the company. It has a separate gapps package to get Google Services/Play Store just like any other custom ROM.
Think of it as a 'reference rom' for other developers to get on the AOSP train if they choose to do so.
zephiK said:
It doesn't need to be certified by Google, its treated as a custom ROM and is not officially supported by the company. It has a separate gapps package to get Google Services/Play Store just like any other custom ROM.
Think of it as a 'reference rom' for other developers to get on the AOSP train if they choose to do so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm aware. Is built from the cm source without the cm customizations.
Sent from my One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
can you dirty flash to regular cm, or is it different enough that we need to wipe the system?
I do agree that CM11 nightly is much more stable than CM11s.
But I still like CM11 looks though. CM11s a bit weird for me.
OnePlus One will be getting a new version of CM11S very soon. And will get Android L one released also... why waste time on older versions? OP clearly has no business sense... There has already been one official OTA that fixed some things (nothing is broken on my OnePlus One, everything works great) There are also 4 or 5 official roms... flashing doesn't void warranty... so I'd say they're doing quite well actually.
Swyped on my awesome OnePlus One 64gb
Unlock bootloader - check
Root access - check
TWRP recovery - check
Warranty still good - check
Hi just got the nexus 5 and its rooted rumning cm11 m9 and all is good. What my question is that will franco kernel work with cm11,m9 as im aware the latest version dont but not too sure about cm11 m9. I have tried searching but no luck.
Don't think so...afaik FK doesn't work with CM and derivatives
Sent from my GT-I9305 using XDA Free mobile app
It should work with older versions, before they implemented CAF, not sure when that happened though.
Kind of pointless though, there are many other roms. Try some out before you decide it is the only one.
Nothing against CM.
Ok thanks for letting me know. Just angry as i gt the franco updater from playstore and it wouldnt let me uninstall or refund it so i had to force uninstall with sd maid pro
wangdaning said:
It should work with older versions, before they implemented CAF, not sure when that happened though.
Kind of pointless though, there are many other roms. Try some out before you decide it is the only one.
Nothing against CM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thing is i have tried many roms on my previuos phomes (s4,s1,wave) but i always got back to cm i dunno i guess i only like CM as its stock google-like but with a few moar features. Paranoid is nice but its too much customized for me lol
I guess ill just wait until frano makes it usable again for cm11 m9
-Turbo- said:
Thing is i have tried many roms on my previuos phomes (s4,s1,wave) but i always got back to cm i dunno i guess i only like CM as its stock google-like but with a few moar features. Paranoid is nice but its too much customized for me lol
I guess ill just wait until frano makes it usable again for cm11 m9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Franco will not become cm compatible. CM is the most customised ROM out there, so much so, it is the only (original) ROM to use CAF. You must use a CAF kernel with CM. Chaos is good.
Otherwise if you must use Franco (seems silly) you'll have to use stock or AOSP.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
You should give Elemental X a try. It complements CM 11 very well.
-Turbo- said:
Thing is i have tried many roms on my previuos phomes (s4,s1,wave) but i always got back to cm i dunno i guess i only like CM as its stock google-like but with a few moar features. Paranoid is nice but its too much customized for me lol
I guess ill just wait until frano makes it usable again for cm11 m9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PA is too customized?
Wha?
#stayparanoid
Pirateghost said:
PA is too customized?
Wha?
Like the features e.g. changing dpi, status bar colors, icons for me its too much. I remember when i had it on my s4 good rom but not for me i like cm or dnt mind omni
And naah its good guess ill stick to stock cm kernel thanks for advice and info ya'all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As mentioned above: franco doesn't work with cm-based ROM!
If u check the franco thread the warning will jump at you...
-Turbo- said:
Pirateghost said:
PA is too customized?
Wha?
Like the features e.g. changing dpi, status bar colors, icons for me its too much. I remember when i had it on my s4 good rom but not for me i like cm or dnt mind omni
And naah its good guess ill stick to stock cm kernel thanks for advice and info ya'all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah. You haven't used PA 4.x obviously
#stayparanoid
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You know you can choose which tweaks to use right? You don't have to have 238 DPI with luminous pink signal icons. Though that does sound kinda cool!
Pirateghost said:
-Turbo- said:
Yeah. You haven't used PA 4.x obviously
Why? Isit less customized? Look my thread was just about asking if franco is compatible with cm, not changing my rom. No offence to any1 but like i said i love cm rom and if franco is a no go then so be it. Geeeeeeeeeeeeeez
#stayparanoid
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I go between stock ROM and Mahdi and aokp
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Then why mention PA at all? ...and the cite the most ridiculous, childish reason to NOT use it?
If you don't want to cause offense or make yourself look foolish, take more care about what you say. If you don't want to debate anything specific, dont say it at all.
This thread has run its course. Plenty of great cm kernels around.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Looks like answer has been given
Thanks
I like AOSP ROM, but i'm not sure if there any ROM yet.
¿Liquid? ¿SlimSaber?
Thnx for reply.
SergioPC92 said:
I like AOSP ROM, but i'm not sure if there any ROM yet.
¿Liquid? ¿SlimSaber?
Thnx for reply.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are a lot of them. Look in both Development sections for 5.0 in the title. Vanir is probably the most stable and bug free right now > http://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-one/orig-development/official-vaniraosp-t2890749
Vanir is AOSP based?
VanirAosp is Very stable
---------- Post added at 02:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:16 PM ----------
SergioPC92 said:
Vanir is AOSP based?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's cyanogenmod based
Mmm thanks, and any AOSP based ROM? Lolipop? Anything?
SergioPC92 said:
Mmm thanks, and any AOSP based ROM? Lolipop? Anything?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CyanogenMod is AOSP. Vanir (AOSP) is indistinguishable from vanilla AOSP.
cam30era said:
CyanogenMod is AOSP. Vanir (AOSP) is indistinguishable from vanilla AOSP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM is not AOSP
bombadier said:
CM is not AOSP
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh? When did CyanogenMod stop basing their ROMs on AOSP?
cam30era said:
Oh? When did CyanogenMod stop basing their ROMs on AOSP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its different they get the sources and do cm stuff to them,generally you will get kernels that are for AOSP or CM based ROMS as a result
bombadier said:
Its different they get the sources and do cm stuff to them,generally you will get kernels that are for AOSP or CM based ROMS as a result
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm currently running Vanir ROM. It is indistinguishable from vanilla AOSP (on my Moto X). And for most users, the current iterations of CM12 are so lightly customized that they are, for all intents and purposes unadulterated AOSP too.
I suppose if one wants to split hairs, one could make the argument that these aren't pure AOSP. Then one would have to head over to the OnePlus forum and flash the new , very buggy 5.0 ROM (Not!).
cam30era said:
I'm currently running Vanir ROM. It is indistinguishable from vanilla AOSP (on my Moto X). And for most users, the current iterations of CM12 are so lightly customized that they are, for all intents and purposes unadulterated AOSP too.
I suppose if one wants to split hairs, one could make the argument that these aren't pure AOSP. Then one would have to head over to the OnePlus forum and flash the new , very buggy 5.0 ROM (Not!).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Best to stay away from the opo forums for the serious stuff, the point I was making was just that you have either AOSP or CM and then everything comes from there really,
You need to be aware as you can have serious problems if you flash the wrong type of kernel, I came from a nexus so for me there was quite an important difference and had to watch what version you flashed,amazed actually at how slow development has been with lollipop, as you say a lot of work needed to find one with some customisations,will stick to kikkat till an offiical lollipop S version appears for the bacon
Best lolipop rom
TO me http://forum.xda-developers.com/one...m-bliss-stalk-team-bliss-bacon-10-28-t2921057
this is the best lolipop rom for onepluso ne buddy
Hey, I can't a find a clean and stable aosp rom for bacon that suits my needs, so I want to build my own. But I need help, I havent built roms before. Only compiled another custom rom once.
Would compiling aosp (+ caf & cm to make it work?) for bacon require much programming skills?
I would be very grateful if someone would assist me in making of the rom, or at least point me in the right direction.
I would only need some very basic custom features in the rom. (clear all recents, cm snap camera ...)
I have Ubuntu 15.04 with a little over 100gb of free space, installed as dual boot besides windows 10-
Thank you.
Also please do not recommend other "aosp" roms in this thread for me to download and install, I want to make my own.
If you want a nexus experience I can recommend AOSP-CAF you . It is basicly barebone AOSP without any additional features.
Bongofriend said:
If you want a nexus experience I can recommend AOSP-CAF you . It is basicly barebone AOSP without any additional features.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I can compile that? or is there already a build download? Could I base my ROM off of this?
Kattiq said:
So I can compile that? or is there already a build download? Could I base my ROM off of this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Somebody made a thread about the rom some time ago but I don't think the OP maintains the rom anymore
Anyone?
Kattiq said:
Anyone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOSP rom for bacon would basically mean cyanogenmod without cyanogenmod features, so reading your requirements i say you try the AOSP CAF rom or the Krexus rom, both the roms fit yuor requirements (read their respective threads). good luck
baconxda said:
AOSP rom for bacon would basically mean cyanogenmod without cyanogenmod features, so reading your requirements i say you try the AOSP CAF rom or the Krexus rom, both the roms fit yuor requirements (read their respective threads). good luck
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so you're saying those roms are Cyanogenmod huh?
I found this ROM http://downloads.techexhibeo.ski/Android/LegacyServer/aosp-mm6.0.1-20160621-bacon.zip, I don't know who is the creator of it, but it is great. The perfect aosp rom for bacon. I'm using it now, seems very stable too. I recommend it for anyone who wants a clean aosp experience.