Hey guys,
So I really want to get an AOSP rom but seems whenever i go to one i have problems. I tried LiquidSmooth R2 last night and had problems(LED light not working for SMS).
What would you recommend? I keep seeing CM10.1 but theres so many unofficial builds that i dont know which to go with. I just want stability which i know is a big thing ha. Any suggestions?
ponzi314 said:
Hey guys,
So I really want to get an AOSP rom but seems whenever i go to one i have problems. I tried LiquidSmooth R2 last night and had problems(LED light not working for SMS).
What would you recommend? I keep seeing CM10.1 but theres so many unofficial builds that i dont know which to go with. I just want stability which i know is a big thing ha. Any suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It honestly depends on what you want in a ROM as what works for me won't be good for you. Right now am running the Avatar ROM which is CM 10.1 with MIUI themes which is stable for me but like all ROMs you might not have the same experience.
Stable
Official cyanogenmods are usually stable. You can look on their site to find their downloads if you're confused by the unofficia; vs official. Other than that as was previously stated, test out the rom (I usually give the rom a week to see what issues may be present) and use that to determine features you may like. If you want recommendations on roms I would say AOSPA (Paranoid Android), AOKP, Cyanogenmod, carbon rom, rootbox, liquidsmooth(but you already used that), Blackbean(You can try 7, but 8 is on the way), and that's pretty much it, also don't completely turn away from unofficial builds yet. Read the forums and find out about them a little. I've been running an unofficial rootbox with cherrypicks for the last two weeks and it is rock solid for example. Hopefully this helps you out with you decision. Have fun and happy flashing
---------- Post added at 08:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:43 PM ----------
jmxc23 said:
It honestly depends on what you want in a ROM as what works for me won't be good for you. Right now am running the Avatar ROM which is CM 10.1 with MIUI themes which is stable for me but like all ROMs you might not have the same experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just have to say that rom looks awesome. gonna have to try it :good:
Slimbeans has been very stable for me.
ponzi314 said:
Hey guys,
So I really want to get an AOSP rom but seems whenever i go to one i have problems. I tried LiquidSmooth R2 last night and had problems(LED light not working for SMS).
What would you recommend? I keep seeing CM10.1 but theres so many unofficial builds that i dont know which to go with. I just want stability which i know is a big thing ha. Any suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Liquid works the best for me, great combination of stability and speed. It's also extremely smooth
saintsantos said:
Official cyanogenmods are usually stable. You can look on their site to find their downloads if you're confused by the unofficia; vs official. Other than that as was previously stated, test out the rom (I usually give the rom a week to see what issues may be present) and use that to determine features you may like. If you want recommendations on roms I would say AOSPA (Paranoid Android), AOKP, Cyanogenmod, carbon rom, rootbox, liquidsmooth(but you already used that), Blackbean(You can try 7, but 8 is on the way), and that's pretty much it, also don't completely turn away from unofficial builds yet. Read the forums and find out about them a little. I've been running an unofficial rootbox with cherrypicks for the last two weeks and it is rock solid for example. Hopefully this helps you out with you decision. Have fun and happy flashing
I might have to try Paranoid Android. I want just something that works for everyday when i tried CM10.1 but the bluetooth streaming wasnt working
---------- Post added at 08:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:43 PM ----------
I just have to say that rom looks awesome. gonna have to try it :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lvgdgts said:
Slimbeans has been very stable for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never tried this. is it better then Paranoid?
mcdevil58 said:
Liquid works the best for me, great combination of stability and speed. It's also extremely smooth
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Liquid the SMS led wasnt working!! thats my only problem
theyre all stable. pick the one that works best for you.
only you can answer this question.
ponzi314 said:
Never tried this. is it better then Paranoid?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't tried Paranoid. I can say that Slimbeans is very stable, fast and beautifully constructed. You really won't find any problems that don't exist in the 4.22 ROMs, as a whole.
lvgdgts said:
I haven't tried Paranoid. I can say that Slimbeans is very stable, fast and beautifully constructed. You really won't find any problems that don't exist in the 4.22 ROMs, as a whole.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just flashed slimbeans earlier and it already locked up one me once. Should i just go back to 4.2.1?
ponzi314 said:
Just flashed slimbeans earlier and it already locked up one me once. Should i just go back to 4.2.1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what I'm gathering in the forums, the stable release if Liquid is coming... Soon... Rejoice and be glad of it.
For me AOKP and Eclipse were the most stable. So it depends on your phone n your setup also preferences
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Related
Can't post this in the development section as a response so I will post it here. Does the new InstigatorX 6.1 kernel work on TeamChopsticks CM10 8/12 a2 ROM? YES!!! Everything works great. Camera, video and landscape work also. Only issue is I get FC's using Facebook sometimes but that is minor for me. Used CWM 6xx to flash. Flashed rom, gapps 7/29 and kernel flawlessly. As always, thanks to everyone involved for making our phones much more enjoyable! Enjoy!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app
Calling and texting also work good. No issues yet. Still an alpha so you may have issues with other programs. Chances are that we don't have the same stuff. Only thing is overall phone volume has been low since I first flashed CM9 two months ago. Easy fix was downloading a volume boost app.
Sent from ye ol' Skyrocket
clip1003 said:
Can't post this in the development section as a response so I will post it here. Does the new InstigatorX 6.1 kernel work on TeamChopsticks CM10 8/12 a2 ROM? YES!!! Everything works great. Camera, video and landscape work also. Only issue is I get FC's using Facebook sometimes but that is minor for me. Used CWM 6xx to flash. Flashed rom, gapps 7/29 and kernel flawlessly. As always, thanks to everyone involved for making our phones much more enjoyable! Enjoy!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree completely but it is strange that I was using 6.0 before upgrading to 6.1 and worked flawlessly, my problem is flash not working for videos on the sites I browse that previously worked before
yavihah said:
I agree completely but it is strange that I was using 6.0 before upgrading to 6.1 and worked flawlessly, my problem is flash not working for videos on the sites I browse that previously worked before
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
YouTube and Break apps work without fc'ing. Have noticed the same on actual websites with flash though. like ebaumsworld, but I can usually refresh the page and it loads.
Dispatched from ye ol' Skyrocket running TeamChopsticks CM10 a2 4.1.1 JB w/ InstigatorX 6.1 kernel
please update...i love it
hey peps cant post on forum since i just signed up..kinda lame.. i just want to give props to gmillz and armyvet for their skyrocket rom aokp build.. i have been running it for close to 2 weeks and i really like it... i have been keeping up on the reads and i from what i am understanding is you both are kinda of walking away from it.. i have tried the cm 10 versions, the paranoid one as well and i have to give it to you guys.. your jb aokp blows them away... if any of you guys catch this keep up the good work and if anyone wants to try a good jb rom i highly suggest this one.. it has had a few fc's but nothing bad.. very user friendly and could only get way better... im on my phone and cant send a link so its the
[rom][4.1.1]aokp jellybean[alpha 2][8/05/12] build
dlucks80 said:
hey peps cant post on forum since i just signed up..kinda lame.. i just want to give props to gmillz and armyvet for their skyrocket rom aokp build.. i have been running it for close to 2 weeks and i really like it... i have been keeping up on the reads and i from what i am understanding is you both are kinda of walking away from it.. i have tried the cm 10 versions, the paranoid one as well and i have to give it to you guys.. your jb aokp blows them away... if any of you guys catch this keep up the good work and if anyone wants to try a good jb rom i highly suggest this one.. it has had a few fc's but nothing bad.. very user friendly and could only get way better... im on my phone and cant send a link so its the
[rom][4.1.1]aokp jellybean[alpha 2][8/05/12] build
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
r4ins is going to keep up with the AOKP Jellybean project since armyvet is not, and gmillz will also probably keep building on their ROM. I'm on the 8/5 with the 1a chopsticks base and InstigatorX 6.2 kernel. If you're experiencing a "choppy" feel, check out either the Darkside or InstigatorX kernel and pick a good frequency governor. That can help a lot. On any of these early ROM's you're going to still get FC's and reboots.. they're Alpha's. If avoiding that is the most important thing to you, I would stick to CM9, Chimera, SkyICS, or a similar ICS ROM.
I've been playing around flashing new ROM's and they all seem to have issues. Does anyone know which JB ROM has the least amount of issues?
SteveCampsOut said:
I've been playing around flashing new ROM's and they all seem to have issues. Does anyone know which JB ROM has the least amount of issues?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's subjective. If there was one be all and end all least buggy and "best" ROM I imagine we all would be running it.
What I consider an issue may not be that big of a thing at all for you. Some phones play with each ROM a little differently as well and some bugs may affect yours that don't affect mine.
So you are already doing the best thing flashing and seeing what works best for you and with your phone. The OP of each ROM should tell you major issues affecting each: video not working, torch a little wonky, etc. So that will help you whittle it down a little. Other than that welcome to fun of flashing.
Sent from a de-Funkt Infuse
Smokestack360 said:
That's subjective. If there was one be all and end all least buggy and "best" ROM I imagine we all would be running it.
What I consider an issue may not be that big of a thing at all for you. Some phones play with each ROM a little differently as well and some bugs may affect yours that don't affect mine.
So you are already doing the best thing flashing and seeing what works best for you and with your phone. The OP of each ROM should tell you major issues affecting each: video not working, torch a little wonky, etc. So that will help you whittle it down a little. Other than that welcome to fun of flashing.
Sent from a de-Funkt Infuse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it doesn't hurt to ask the opinions of others so long as we all realize that they're opinions and not concrete absolute truths. Right now I'm running the LiquidSmooth R8 ROM and anything that uses voice input crashes. This means JP Google Search is borked! Now is this just my issue? Would a re-flash fix it or is it a known issue? Inquiring minds wanna know....
SteveCampsOut said:
I've been playing around flashing new ROM's and they all seem to have issues. Does anyone know which JB ROM has the least amount of issues?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ive been running CM10 mainly its super smooth and has good battery life. Remics JB rom is really good also
I've never really used voice input, so Im not going to be the greatest help there. Reflashes do clear up some issues, wouldn't hurt. Maybe even a fresh download of the ROM. If you havent already try inquiring in that particular ROMs thread, to see if anyone else is experiencing the same thing. Good luck
Edit:
If its google search it may be your gapps, make sure you have the most current.
Sent from a de-Funkt Infuse
Smokestack360 said:
I've never really used voice input, so Im not going to be the greatest help there. Reflashes do clear up some issues, wouldn't hurt. Maybe even a fresh download of the ROM. If you havent already try inquiring in that particular ROMs thread, to see if anyone else is experiencing the same thing. Good luck
Edit:
If its google search it may be your gapps, make sure you have the most current.
Sent from a de-Funkt Infuse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's definitely Google Search because the crash message says Google Search has stopped even when I'm just using voice to send texts...
Liquid Smooth RC8. I to flashed several JB ROMs and found this to work the best for me.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium and Liquid Smooth RC8
Liquid smooth jelly bean RC8 is the one.!!! Atleast for me !
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda app-developers app
Hassam Tariq said:
Liquid smooth jelly bean RC8 is the one.!!! Atleast for me !
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2005016 yet? :thumbup:
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium
FauxAffliction said:
Have you tried http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2005016 yet? :thumbup:
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No I haven't , I once tried CM10 from scott. really an amazing rom but i was having lots of problems, while flashing the gaps,
I was doing may be wrong but i was flashing the right things i know, but well somehow i was not able to flash the rom properly, so I flashed this one , its only been a week, i am on this one.
But yes i will definitely give it a shot.
Is this one a complete daily driver ?
Little bugs doesn't matter(it depends) at all, stock had millions of them.!!
I am on 4.1.2 JB, If Slim bean is coming up with 4.2 I am going to try it for sure
Right now really happy with Liquid Smooth.
---------- Post added at 06:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:27 PM ----------
FauxAffliction said:
Have you tried http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2005016 yet? :thumbup:
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see .. just exploring the Rom,
Looks quite awesome man!
Surely going to try it in a day or two.
Thanks for sharing
The thing you have to remember about these JB roms on our Infuse is that we are still using a modded GB kernel. Samsung as far as I know (I could be wrong) hasn't released the kernel source code for our device and it's making it very hard for them to update the kernel. I use Scott's CM10 4.2.1 right now and it's basically been bug free. It doesn't even have all the CM source code merged into it yet. I've never had a rom with so much free memory before! I think it's amazing what he is doing with our old device and he deserves MAJOR props and donations for all his efforts!
Hassam Tariq said:
No I haven't , I once tried CM10 from scott. really an amazing rom but i was having lots of problems, while flashing the gaps,
I was doing may be wrong but i was flashing the right things i know, but well somehow i was not able to flash the rom properly, so I flashed this one , its only been a week, i am on this one.
But yes i will definitely give it a shot.
Is this one a complete daily driver ?
Little bugs doesn't matter(it depends) at all, stock had millions of them.!!
I am on 4.1.2 JB, If Slim bean is coming up with 4.2 I am going to try it for sure
Right now really happy with Liquid Smooth.
---------- Post added at 06:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:27 PM ----------
I see .. just exploring the Rom,
Looks quite awesome man!
Surely going to try it in a day or two.
Thanks for sharing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah its slim bean that I have personally built from source. I really have zero bugs and use it as my daily driver. I mean it has the same bugs as any jb ROM because we all compile from Scotts cm10 build. Its the exact same as CM 10 except with a TON of custom features! I'm currently working on a 4.2.1 version that looks to hopefully be my smoothest yet. Check it out and lemme know what you think :thumbup:
Sent from my SGH-I997 using xda premium
Hey!
Soo haven't been on here but I am starting to get bored of Touch Wiz ..so I was wondering if anyone can recommend me a PURE Android Rom, preferably something with all the current Android features that is also stable.
I also want to be able to run Google Wallet & DashClock Widget ..if possible!
Thanks
You can't really go wrong with cyanogenmod. I'm currently running a nightly of CarbonRom and I'm very happy with it. Not sure your going to get Google Wallet on a Verizon phone. DashClock is rolled into CarbonRom from memory.
ffeingol said:
You can't really go wrong with cyanogenmod. I'm currently running a nightly of CarbonRom and I'm very happy with it. Not sure your going to get Google Wallet on a Verizon phone. DashClock is rolled into CarbonRom from memory.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have to ask whats the difference from Cyanogenmod & CarbonRom? Since its a nightly is their any problems u encountered?
Thanks
Cyanogenmod is much closer to Vanilla 4.2.2 (but it does have some custom features). CarbonRom gives you a lot more settings that you can tweak (notifications, icons etc) and includes PIE and Halo. cyanogenmod and CarbonRom (on goo.im).
I had to go with the Nighly to get the camera working. The camera did not work on the stable release so it was suggested to use a Nightly.
you can easily get wallet working on a vzw gs3.
ddurandSGS3 said:
you can easily get wallet working on a vzw gs3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I used the work around on it before when I rooted it, but I want a Vanilla ROM on which I can run it too
ffeingol said:
Cyanogenmod is much closer to Vanilla 4.2.2 (but it does have some custom features). CarbonRom gives you a lot more settings that you can tweak (notifications, icons etc) and includes PIE and Halo. cyanogenmod and CarbonRom (on goo.im).
I had to go with the Nighly to get the camera working. The camera did not work on the stable release so it was suggested to use a Nightly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will def look into Cyanogenmod
..also what is this PIE & HALO u speak of?
PIE is a new menu system (best way I can describe it). Halo is much harder to describe, so the video does it better.
projektHAZE said:
Yea I used the work around on it before when I rooted it, but I want a Vanilla ROM on which I can run it too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it should work on any rom for our device
ddurandSGS3 said:
you can easily get wallet working on a vzw gs3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you guys have a link to the thread? Thanks!
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
XdrummerXboy said:
Do you guys have a link to the thread? Thanks!
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is a thread I found, but I have not personally tried it
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2125300
---------- Post added at 02:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:52 PM ----------
I like CM the best. I don't find myself using the extra features (like PIE) that other ROMs have.
XdrummerXboy said:
Do you guys have a link to the thread? Thanks!
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here u go>
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1794727
Also can someone link me towards a rooting & flashing guide ..I haven't done this in a while so need to be careful
Hi there mates,
I finally decided to dump the stock ROM and give it a try on custom one.
After reading a bit i think i'm starting to like Cyanogen, but since i want a good stable ROM i appreciated some opinions form anyone who is using it.
1st and really important: my stock ROM does not have any of the know issues (deep sleep probs, random reboots, battery drains etc...) so anyone know if CM 9.x stable have any of this issues?
2nd does everything work? In the CM forums i found no one complaining with "loosing" functionality's but i would like to ear from anyone that uses this on a daily basis. (i found a lot of people complaining with encryption problem and bad flashing but not about Wifi radio, camera, etc...)
3rd: Is this the best choice to use on a daily basis? Or there is a better/more stable/more fluid Rom?
Thanks to all.
Most of the CM 10.x ROMs are pretty stable and usable. I am a fan of the KatKiss ROMs. 4.2.2 has the best functionality, but the 4.3 variant is not bad. The only thng that does not work for me is camera on Skype.
+1 for KatKiss #226
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2362764
frederuco said:
Most of the CM 10.x ROMs are pretty stable and usable. I am a fan of the KatKiss ROMs. 4.2.2 has the best functionality, but the 4.3 variant is not bad. The only thng that does not work for me is camera on Skype.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thks for the info but now im confused...
You mentioned that Skype cant use the front cam. Is that on CM stable roms or the KatKiss ones? Im asking because i use skype a lot and that is an issue to me. :/
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Exnor said:
Thks for the info but now im confused...
You mentioned that Skype cant use the front cam. Is that on CM stable roms or the KatKiss ones? Im asking because i use skype a lot and that is an issue to me. :/
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On KatKiss 4.3 the camera do t work for me. The CM 10 and 10.1 ROMs and KatKiss 4.2.2 it worked fine. I have not tried any CM 10.2 ROMs.
frederuco said:
On KatKiss 4.3 the camera do t work for me. The CM 10 and 10.1 ROMs and KatKiss 4.2.2 it worked fine. I have not tried any CM 10.2 ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried the stable version recommended on the CM site? Its 9.1.
The 10.x versions are not marked as stable... and i really dont want to re-re-reflash over and over again
Thks
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Exnor said:
Have you tried the stable version recommended on the CM site? Its 9.1.
The 10.x versions are not marked as stable... and i really dont want to re-re-reflash over and over again
Thks
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm, if I did it was a while ago. CM 9 is based on ICS. I have not run an ICS ROM for more than a few hours in over a year. I would say that the Jelly Bean based ROMs (CM10.X) feel SO much faster due to project butter. I flashed back to stock ICS a bit ago, and it feels so sluggish.
Most of the threads on CM 10 you can see how stable they are. I know the No-Name CM 10.1 is rock solid. Joesteink has moved on, but the ROM is still rock solid and many users swear by it.
frederuco said:
Hmmm, if I did it was a while ago. CM 9 is based on ICS. I have not run an ICS ROM for more than a few hours in over a year. I would say that the Jelly Bean based ROMs (CM10.X) feel SO much faster due to project butter. I flashed back to stock ICS a bit ago, and it feels so sluggish.
Most of the threads on CM 10 you can see how stable they are. I know the No-Name CM 10.1 is rock solid. Joesteink has moved on, but the ROM is still rock solid and many users swear by it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cant find the links for that version... only the linaro versions...
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Here is the link to the downloads: http://nexfiles.kjonigsen.net/tf101/cm10.2/
And the thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2402752
frederuco said:
Here is the link to the downloads: http://nexfiles.kjonigsen.net/tf101/cm10.2/
And the thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2402752
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks mate... i'm gonna give it a try and post my results here in case is useful for other people.
Exnor said:
Thanks mate... i'm gonna give it a try and post my results here in case is useful for other people.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is CM finally stable? I had it installed a year or so ago, but then it was still beta for the transformer. Since then I used various flavors and eventually stayed with the EOS-build. Very stable with all the options I ever need (like overclocking and gouvenor-changing). I'm still using EOS, since it's stable and performing very well. Katkiss seems to be the continuation of it, so you could try it yourself And if you don't like it, then you drop it for something else
Hi there people,
I'm thinking of trying SlimRom and I was just wondering many roms say "AOSP" and actually are CM based(which is AOSP afaik), is the SlimRom cm based or AOSP in it's pure form?
I'd like to try some AOSP roms(not based on CM)
P.S. If you know other roms with reduced size feel free to share
evronetwork said:
Hi there people,
I'm thinking of trying SlimRom and I was just wondering many roms say "AOSP" and actually are CM based(which is AOSP afaik), is the SlimRom cm based or AOSP in it's pure form?
I'd like to try some AOSP roms(not based on CM)
P.S. If you know other roms with reduced size feel free to share
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SlimRom kernel is CM based. But it has to look and feel of AOSP. The only OPO ROM that I'm aware of that does not use a CM based kernel is Omni.
cam30era said:
SlimRom kernel is CM based. But it has to look and feel of AOSP. The only OPO ROM that I'm aware of that does not use a CM based kernel is Omni.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rom talking, almost all AOSP roms use CM code... which doesn't mean they are entirely CM based. Afaik, Slim and AOSPA (and other projects) take many things from CM source but they keep their own line of developement, and in some aspects they diverge a lot. But in all cases, they use (as you stated) CM kernel base. Omni is the only one that's truly independent from cyanogen (rom & kernel), I think. Plus, you now got our manufacturer working on a pure AOSP rom, but I'm unsure if cyanogen did that or Oppo.
fermasia said:
Rom talking, almost all AOSP roms use CM code... which doesn't mean they are entirely CM based. Afaik, Slim and AOSPA (and other projects) take many things from CM source but they keep their own line of developement, and in some aspects they diverge a lot. But in all cases, they use (as you stated) CM kernel base. Omni is the only one that's truly independent from cyanogen (rom & kernel), I think. Plus, you now got our manufacturer working on a pure AOSP rom, but I'm unsure if cyanogen did that or Oppo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why oppo or cm, can't be independed? ..I'd like an pure AOSP rom (stable) and right now it's far from stable
evronetwork said:
Why oppo or cm, can't be independed? ..I'd like an pure AOSP rom (stable) and right now it's far from stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried SlimLP? If not, you should. It's my daily driver and rock solid for me.
fermasia said:
.....Plus, you now got our manufacturer working on a pure AOSP rom, but I'm unsure if cyanogen did that or Oppo.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a project by OnePlus themselves.
Transmitted via Bacon
---------- Post added at 06:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:32 AM ----------
evronetwork said:
Why oppo or cm, can't be independed? ..I'd like an pure AOSP rom (stable) and right now it's far from stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're gonna have to be patient then. Or just try Slim, it may use the CM kernel but you're not going to notice that at all because kernel operations take place on a lower level behind the scenes.
Transmitted via Bacon
cam30era said:
Have you tried SlimLP? If not, you should. It's my daily driver and rock solid for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll try SlimLP but when it's ready, right now I see only unofficial nightlies..
When I had DHD I was willing to try every possible combo in order to get just a little bit better performance but since now this isn't the issue I prefer something stable, even 44S I'm on isn't stable enough for me.
---------------------
timmaaa said:
That's a project by OnePlus themselves.
Transmitted via Bacon
---------- Post added at 06:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:32 AM ----------
You're gonna have to be patient then. Or just try Slim, it may use the CM kernel but you're not going to notice that at all because kernel operations take place on a lower level behind the scenes.
Transmitted via Bacon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Although not very good at programming, I did had my fair share of it when finished my undergraduate program, I know what a kernel is and what it does
evronetwork said:
Although not very good at programming, I did had my fair share of it when finished my undergraduate program, I know what a kernel is and what it does
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool, not everyone does so just making sure I give information to suit that potential situation.
Think there is a pure aosp ROM in the forums?
timmaaa said:
Cool, not everyone does so just making sure I give information to suit that potential situation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a BSc(Hons) Computing degree heh, but good thought of informing ppl
evertking said:
Think there is a pure aosp ROM in the forums?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pure AOSP not based on CM? care to shed a light on this? (or you think there isn't any.. you got me confused )
evronetwork said:
Pure AOSP not based on CM? care to shed a light on this? (or you think there isn't any.. you got me confused )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's pure aosp, developed by OnePlus and altered a little by the guy that posted it. It's in the dev section.
timmaaa said:
It's pure aosp, developed by OnePlus and altered a little by the guy that posted it. It's in the dev section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are referring about AOSP by OnePlus ..man still at alpha stage WAY too buggy for my taste, maybe when it's stable I'll try it.
Although here on xda some created patches and bugfixes but still I'm looking for rock-solid stability, I have speed(compared to my old and previous DHD) so I'm not seeking on testing 10 roms per week as I did in the past
evronetwork said:
You are referring about AOSP by OnePlus ..man still at alpha stage WAY too buggy for my taste, maybe when it's stable I'll try it.
Although here on xda some created patches and bugfixes but still I'm looking for rock-solid stability, I have speed(compared to my old and previous DHD) so I'm not seeking on testing 10 roms per week as I did in the past
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree 100%, but you asked for aosp ROMs and that's it.
Transmitted via Bacon
timmaaa said:
I agree 100%, but you asked for aosp ROMs and that's it.
Transmitted via Bacon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just asked in case I was unaware of something, my field is computers in general and I might lack in android and surely don't know everything about it
Too bad vanilla android isn't around for every phone(nexus style roms), just bare bone android with proper drivers in it - that would be fast ...and slim
P.S. I'll try slimlp when it's out I guess(officially), thank you guys for all ur answers - Fact, it might take a while..I expect 1+1 to deliver rom sometime in late feb(or early feb with bugs ..depends) after that in March or May I should expect SlimLP ..don't take my word I'm wild guessing
evronetwork said:
I just asked in case I was unaware of something, my field is computers in general and I might lack in android and surely don't know everything about it
Too bad vanilla android isn't around for every phone(nexus style roms), just bare bone android with proper drivers in it - that would be fast ...and slim
P.S. I'll try slimlp when it's out I guess(officially), thank you guys for all ur answers - Fact, it might take a while..I expect 1+1 to deliver rom sometime in late feb(or early feb with bugs ..depends) after that in March or May I should expect SlimLP ..don't take my word I'm wild guessing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SlimLP is official for this device. Even if it wasn't it really doesn't matter, it's built from the proper source.
Transmitted via Bacon
timmaaa said:
SlimLP is official for this device. Even if it wasn't it really doesn't matter, it's built from the proper source.
Transmitted via Bacon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to their website, latest slim rom is SlimKat(kit kat)
http://www.slimroms.net/index.php/downloads/dlsearch/viewcategory/1281-bacon
I see no official SlimLP for our 1+1, not just yet(many unofficial ones exist ..I know)
evronetwork said:
According to their website, latest slim rom is SlimKat(kit kat)
http://www.slimroms.net/index.php/downloads/dlsearch/viewcategory/1281-bacon
I see no official SlimLP for our 1+1, not just yet(many unofficial ones exist ..I know)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought Robbie's was official, guess I was wrong. Like I said though, it really doesn't make a lick of difference, it's still built from Slim source, the One and only difference is that it's missing the official tag in the title, that's it. People all too often mistake that tag to actually mean something, it doesn't.
Transmitted via Bacon
timmaaa said:
I thought Robbie's was official, guess I was wrong. Like I said though, it really doesn't make a lick of difference, it's still built from Slim source, the One and only difference is that it's missing the official tag in the title, that's it. People all too often mistake that tag to actually mean something, it doesn't.
Transmitted via Bacon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1+1 has already many bugs in it's latest 44S I really don't want anymore even if it's a glitched icon, a minor issue or something that most people don't care about. I see "official" as a "we've test it more than just flash it and leave it for a couple of days"
I mean you know 1+1 has issue when 3rd party camera app is installed and you try to use flash on low light enviroment right? it's probably a driver issue although FV-5 app fix this(workaround), stock camera doesn't have that bug. So in SlimLP if I use the camera does this occur in a 3rd party camera app? ..this should be solved when CM12s hits the market, dunno if it's fixed in the not so official SlimLP
I guess I better back up and try it.. what I have to lose except some time? (I did flash with my previous DHD even 5-6 times per day)
evronetwork said:
I see "official" as a "we've test it more than just flash it and leave it for a couple of days"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Official definitely doesn't mean that. Take CM for example, it's done by a buildbot, no testing at all, and that's completely official. I'd take Robbie's builds over an official release any day of the week. That's what I'm saying, the perception that official is better is completely false.
Transmitted via Bacon
timmaaa said:
Official definitely doesn't mean that. Take CM for example, it's done by a buildbot, no testing at all, and that's completely official. I'd take Robbie's builds over an official release any day of the week. That's what I'm saying, the perception that official is better is completely false.
Transmitted via Bacon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM is the worst example as even cm official builds are buggy sometimes(no proper testing and I'm talking about stable released not nightlies, the guy who build the cm camera app in the past had a long post mention it - nice guy)
I did an EFS backup, did a nandroid backup and doing currently mybackup backup(I use this for apps/contacts since android 2.3.6)