[Q] Which CM version works best? - Xoom Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

So I'm trying to prolong the use of this tablet but keep it stable and quick, and I think CyanogenMod is the way to go. There are a number of versions available for it, with 10.0 being the last stable build that I can find. I flashed 10.0 and it was quick and stable, except for one major problem: the Google+ app just would not load no matter what, and by searching I found others had the same issues with no fix.
So I'm back to stock 4.1.2 JB now, which is fine but I'd rather move to CM if I can. I flashed the latest nightly, but was having major issues with Gapps closing and the Play Store wasn't even available (even though I flashed the correct Gapps package).
For those that are using CM, which version is the best to use? Any help would be much appreciated, thanks!

Honestly, I use the CM11 builds and they are working great.
XOOM XOOM!

slinky317 said:
So I'm trying to prolong the use of this tablet but keep it stable and quick, and I think CyanogenMod is the way to go. There are a number of versions available for it, with 10.0 being the last stable build that I can find. I flashed 10.0 and it was quick and stable, except for one major problem: the Google+ app just would not load no matter what, and by searching I found others had the same issues with no fix.
So I'm back to stock 4.1.2 JB now, which is fine but I'd rather move to CM if I can. I flashed the latest nightly, but was having major issues with Gapps closing and the Play Store wasn't even available (even though I flashed the correct Gapps package).
For those that are using CM, which version is the best to use? Any help would be much appreciated, thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM10.1 (based on 4.2.x) really great. I used it for the past few months.
Never give me problem. Of course you must install 2/20/13 JB Unified GApps.
Looking forward to try CM11 but having hard time with TWRP (big part) at the moment.

TheMan0790 said:
Honestly, I use the CM11 builds and they are working great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Another vote for CM11, but you do have to install BigPart. That isn't a big deal if you read carefully through the resource thread before proceeding. I'm certainly not a tech wizard (color TV and phones without dials were big deals when I was a kid, VCRs didn't come out until I was in college, and I was in my mid twenties when home computers just started to become widespread) and was able to run BigPart without trouble.

I got BigPart working successfully with no problems on the first go. Merely requires some reading and should work fine.
Break me off a piece of that Kit-Kat ROM!

Related

Google wallet not working on cm10

I don't know if this is a general problem or just me but every time I change the build.prop codes then flash wallet,I reboot back up and the NFC options are gone. Im using the latest cm10 on Verizon's s3. I had wallet working on bean stock rom before this as well. Is there a different method for cm10 or is it just not available yet?
pplayz18 said:
I don't know if this is a general problem or just me but every time I change the build.prop codes then flash wallet,I reboot back up and the NFC options are gone. Im using the latest cm10 on Verizon's s3. I had wallet working on bean stock rom before this as well. Is there a different method for cm10 or is it just not available yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which CM10 build are you using? It's my understanding that on the current build of the official CM10 NFC is not yet supported. This could be the case on the unofficial ones as well but I'm not sure.
Relentless D said:
Which CM10 build are you using? It's my understanding that on the current build of the official CM10 NFC is not yet supported. This could be the case on the unofficial ones as well but I'm not sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A nightly unofficial one released last night. 3.0.39
The only thing that is different about getting GW working on CM10 is you don't need to flash anything (except Google Wallet if you are using the .zip provided by ogdobber) and editing the build prop. NFC is currently broken on the newer CM (and all others based off of CM code) for the time being but I would imagine it would be fixed after the main bugs are all squared away.
The last unofficial build I that had NFC working was InvisibleK's 8/13 but that was before the recent MMS or RIL fixes.
Marcismo55 said:
The only thing that is different about getting GW working on CM10 is you don't need to flash anything (except Google Wallet if you are using the .zip provided by ogdobber) and editing the build prop. NFC is currently broken on the newer CM (and all others based off of CM code) for the time being but I would imagine it would be fixed after the main bugs are all squared away.
The last unofficial build I that had NFC working was InvisibleK's 8/13 but that was before the recent MMS or RIL fixes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I figured it out. I was trying to use the same verizon zip file when I needed to use one specifically for aosp roms.
pplayz18 said:
I figured it out. I was trying to use the same verizon zip file when I needed to use one specifically for aosp roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a link to get it working?
pplayz18 said:
I don't know if this is a general problem or just me but every time I change the build.prop codes then flash wallet,I reboot back up and the NFC options are gone. Im using the latest cm10 on Verizon's s3. I had wallet working on bean stock rom before this as well. Is there a different method for cm10 or is it just not available yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you took the time to read the notes on the release, you would see that it is not supported yet.
Since you did not, now you will likely have a ton of people telling you to read next time.
NFC DOESNT WORK. THEREFORE NOTHING THAT RELIES ON IT WORKS.
Its a piece of hardware, that does not FUNCTION yet.
did you also figure out that NFC doesn't work on any CM10 build yet so it doesn't matter what you flash?
Not to thread jack... but...
It's been quite a few days without any action on this thread and NFC is one thing I'd really like to try out. With that said I love CM10, currently running the 8-27 nightly without any other issues and love it... NFC isn't that important that I'd go back to a TW/Stock Rom for it.
Any word from the CM guys on when/if the rils and NFC functionality will be fixed up? Patiently waiting and love everyone working on CM10 D2VZW! :good:
Flashed the 8-31 nightly and NFC just greys out after ticking the box still. Wake me up when September comes
Sent from my R00T3D/UNL0CK3D SGS3 running CM10 nightlies
I was reading in the official CM10 thread that someone had developed a fix and that it would soon be implemented into the Nightlies
Edit:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=30952627&postcount=1317

ROM Suggestion

OK,
So I have tried the Cyan and Omni ROM's.
I must have done something wrong with Cyan as Google Mail kept crashing during initial setup.
Omni has been working fine and seems solid.
So far I have only tried CM11 and Omni 4.4.2
I just want a fast yet stable ROM.
While the two I have tried do fit that bill I'm just wondering what the other options are.
I am a newbie to all this and have been using TWRP to flash the ROM's so it's been pretty simple so far.
Any input is welcome but as a newbie hopefully something similar or as simple to what I've been doing would be best (don't want to brick this thing TF300T)
Thank!
chefytim said:
OK,
So I have tried the Cyan and Omni ROM's.
I must have done something wrong with Cyan as Google Mail kept crashing during initial setup.
Omni has been working fine and seems solid.
So far I have only tried CM11 and Omni 4.4.2
I just want a fast yet stable ROM.
While the two I have tried do fit that bill I'm just wondering what the other options are.
I am a newbie to all this and have been using TWRP to flash the ROM's so it's been pretty simple so far.
Any input is welcome but as a newbie hopefully something similar or as simple to what I've been doing would be best (don't want to brick this thing TF300T)
Thank!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CROM1-x is usually both fast and stable, Android 4.2.2. I think you may have misflashed the gapps with the gmail crashes though, becuase I'm not getting those with CM11.
chefytim said:
OK,
So I have tried the Cyan and Omni ROM's.
I must have done something wrong with Cyan as Google Mail kept crashing during initial setup.
Omni has been working fine and seems solid.
So far I have only tried CM11 and Omni 4.4.2
I just want a fast yet stable ROM.
While the two I have tried do fit that bill I'm just wondering what the other options are.
I am a newbie to all this and have been using TWRP to flash the ROM's so it's been pretty simple so far.
Any input is welcome but as a newbie hopefully something similar or as simple to what I've been doing would be best (don't want to brick this thing TF300T)
Thank!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im con CM11 and so far it has been excellent! Better than stock 4.2, you should flash it again.

Running stock 4.1.2.. What is most stable to flash?

Is 4.1.2 the latest VZW published version?
I'd like to get to 4.3 or 4.4.. what is the most stable ROM that i can flash that won't cause me to lose any features like GPS or Bluetooth?
DatacomGuy said:
Is 4.1.2 the latest VZW published version?
I'd like to get to 4.3 or 4.4.. what is the most stable ROM that i can flash that won't cause me to lose any features like GPS or Bluetooth?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For TW 4.1.2 is the most current, but developers are working on 4.3. Otherwise, I would flash an AOSP ROM & I've had good luck on those too.
DatacomGuy said:
Is 4.1.2 the latest VZW published version?
I'd like to get to 4.3 or 4.4.. what is the most stable ROM that i can flash that won't cause me to lose any features like GPS or Bluetooth?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gummy and SlimKay have full GPS and Bluetooth capabilities. The unofficial CM builds are FAR more stable than the official ones, so if you must use CM, go with an unofficial like Mastamoon or KitKang.
HOWEVER... every custom rom has issues with a 'kill signal' with Bluetooth, so if you use BT, you need to make sure you power down the other device, before you try to turn off BT on your phone; that will send the signal to your device and unpair the two. Otherwise, your phone won't be able to reconnect to BT on that device and you'll have to reboot. It's a known bug and people are working on it.
I used Gummy all December and now I'm running SlimKat... they're stable for daily use. I'd recommend a custom kernel with Slim, though... I'm using Lean Kernel.
DatacomGuy said:
Is 4.1.2 the latest VZW published version?
I'd like to get to 4.3 or 4.4.. what is the most stable ROM that i can flash that won't cause me to lose any features like GPS or Bluetooth?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Take a look at this it was just released
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2591895
beepea206 said:
Gummy and SlimKay have full GPS and Bluetooth capabilities. The unofficial CM builds are FAR more stable than the official ones, so if you must use CM, go with an unofficial like Mastamoon or KitKang.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would an unofficial cm be more stable? From reading the descriptions, it's just cm with a couple of visual tweaks, no?
lexluthor said:
Why would an unofficial cm be more stable? From reading the descriptions, it's just cm with a couple of visual tweaks, no?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Recent CM nightlies are highly unstable and there's often they'll put out a build with a commit they later revert. The unofficial builds vary... some don't release every night (avoiding those bad commits), others cherry-pick and are able to avoid commits they don't think are necessary (and are what often wonk up a build). Basically, they're more fine-tuned for our specific device (the CM builds are just pushed out auto-build) and tend to perform better.
If you look at the feedback in the 'official' thread, then compare that to the unofficial threads, you'll see far more issues in the official one. Could be more noobs going to CM's official builds because it's considered safer, but I've seen some veteran flashers have the same issues, so I'm inclined to believe it's due to how they push out nightlies.
... but that's just my observation. Take it for what it's worth.
beepea206 said:
Recent CM nightlies are highly unstable and there's often they'll put out a build with a commit they later revert. The unofficial builds vary... some don't release every night (avoiding those bad commits), others cherry-pick and are able to avoid commits they don't think are necessary (and are what often wonk up a build). Basically, they're more fine-tuned for our specific device (the CM builds are just pushed out auto-build) and tend to perform better.
If you look at the feedback in the 'official' thread, then compare that to the unofficial threads, you'll see far more issues in the official one. Could be more noobs going to CM's official builds because it's considered safer, but I've seen some veteran flashers have the same issues, so I'm inclined to believe it's due to how they push out nightlies.
... but that's just my observation. Take it for what it's worth.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a reasonable explanation. I'm on CM11 official nightly. I usually read the changelog before I update. I did do a full wipe before updating originally and I've been running very well. I've had 1 random boot in about a week and the camera froze the system once. I had many more random reboots on TW. It's incredibly fast and I've got no lag (that was a bad problem for me on 4.1.2).
Nice one... checking the changelog and/or Gerrit commits is a good practice, IMO. I only flash a nightlie if I find some commits I think would make the rom run better for me... most are small things like language tweaks and updates to other device repos, so flashing the newest version isn't always necessary.
Regarding the random reboots, you probably have the same modem issue I do. There was a recent update to the device RILs that completely resolved the modem 'freakout' i kept having; I believe they used the updated device files from the 4.3 stock builds pushed out, so it made the device more compatible with the 4.3 and 4.4 roms.
DatacomGuy said:
Is 4.1.2 the latest VZW published version?
I'd like to get to 4.3 or 4.4.. what is the most stable ROM that i can flash that won't cause me to lose any features like GPS or Bluetooth?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you like touchwiz, MOAR and Wicked Sensations roms (4.1.2) are pretty good. I'm on cm10.2 (4.3.1) with xposed framework and it's running perfectly. I'm staying away from kitkat cause of all the bluetooth issues.

Cyanogenmod 11

Hi !
I have a few questions:
- If I flash this unofficial rom, will it be possible to have official updates without flashing another rom ?
- And also, is it already good for everyday use ?
Thanks !
Atlantic_Rim said:
Hi !
I have a few questions:
- If I flash this unofficial rom, will it be possible to have official updates without flashing another rom ?
- And also, is it already good for everyday use ?
Thanks !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
- nope, you won't get official updates.
- it depends on your needs, check the bug list, if it does not bother you then it is okay for your daily use!
Sent from my XT1033 using Tapatalk
i_rnb said:
- nope, you won't get official updates.
- it depends on your needs, check the bug list, if it does not bother you then it is okay for your daily use!
Sent from my XT1033 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok thanks for reply !
Then I think I will wait for the official release, because I want a fully functional version for my moto G
Iv just finally been able to flash it, been on the latest rom for two days, bugs for me are youtube freezing and the lockscreen unlock, which actually isnt that bad, u wont need latest official release because this rom will always be up to date and when the phone gets abandoned, people like dhacker are hero's for us because they'll keep our phone updated
Sent from my Moto G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
will8578 said:
Iv just finally been able to flash it, been on the latest rom for two days, bugs for me are youtube freezing and the lockscreen unlock, which actually isnt that bad, u wont need latest official release because this rom will always be up to date and when the phone gets abandoned, people like dhacker are hero's for us because they'll keep our phone updated
Sent from my Moto G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I know the great job devs are doing for us before the moto G I had a LG optimus L7 and thanks to cyanogenmod I had kitkat on it.
But as far as this phone just came out, I'm asking myself if it's good to avoid my warranty just to have the same version of android ...
(correct me if I say bad words because I have to train my english :laugh: )
Battery life has been better for me and customization, i think im just happy to flash a different rom, been trying for about 2 weeks, or failing more like, ur english is good, good luck to u
Sent from my Moto G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
will8578 said:
Battery life has been better for me and customization, i think im just happy to flash a different rom, been trying for about 2 weeks, or failing more like, ur english is good, good luck to u
Sent from my Moto G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
i_rnb said:
- nope, you won't get official updates.
- it depends on your needs, check the bug list, if it does not bother you then it is okay for your daily use!
Sent from my XT1033 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong. With CMUpdater, if you're running an unofficial build, the nightlies (when they appear) will show up. Even if they don't, you most definitely will be able to manually flash the nightlies without wiping.
The one exception will be if you want to switch to the new "corporate" release streams from Cyngn if those ever get turned on for the device. Those will require a wipe - but official nightlies won't.
Entropy512 said:
Wrong. With CMUpdater, if you're running an unofficial build, the nightlies (when they appear) will show up. Even if they don't, you most definitely will be able to manually flash the nightlies without wiping.
The one exception will be if you want to switch to the new "corporate" release streams from Cyngn if those ever get turned on for the device. Those will require a wipe - but official nightlies won't.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am fully aware for that, but I thought he meant Motorola's official stock updates, not CM's official nightlies.
But still, it is risky to flash official nightly updates on an unofficial build.
Anyway, I might be wrong, I came from a device which did not have a official CM build.
i_rnb said:
I am fully aware for that, but I thought he meant Motorola's official stock updates, not CM's official nightlies.
But still, it is risky to flash official nightly updates on an unofficial build.
Anyway, I might be wrong, I came from a device which did not have a official CM build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There could be risks if you flash an unofficial build from someone who is not at all working on merging a device into CM - they often cherry pick all sort of stuff that causes incompatibilities with upstream to the point where the product really shouldn't be called CM. (I've seen lots of "CM" kangs that had all sorts of extra crap added beyond just doing what is required for device bringup...)
dhacker, however, is an official CM maintainer for many devices, so his builds are the ones that are "on track" for official inclusion.
OK, and I've a few questions again :
If I flash updates directly from CM updater, is it like official updates from Motorola ? I won't lose all my data ?
Because I don't want to lose everything every time a new release come out
U dont lose data, only if u do a factory reset, i do a cache and dalvick wipe, never had any problems doing that
Sent from my Moto G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
will8578 said:
U dont lose data, only if u do a factory reset, i do a cache and dalvick wipe, never had any problems doing that
Sent from my Moto G using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK thanks, then I think I will flash the unofficial ROM when I have time
Atlantic_Rim said:
OK, and I've a few questions again :
If I flash updates directly from CM updater, is it like official updates from Motorola ? I won't lose all my data ?
Because I don't want to lose everything every time a new release come out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If people had to wipe every time they flashed an updated, nightlies wouldn't be as popular as they are now.
In general:
1) If you're coming from another project (CM to Omni or vice versa, or any of those to/from stock) you'll need to wipe. Titanium Backup and/or even Androids 'adb backup' can save a lot of time here
2) If you're coming from a previous version of the same project (An unofficial CM build to official nightlies, and subsequent nightlies) you should only have to wipe if someone screwed up
2b) You can usually even do version upgrades this way - e.g. CM10.2 to CM11, although of course this device never saw 10.2 except possibly some super-pre-alpha builds
One exception you may see down the line - with the formation of Cyanogen Inc (aka Cyngn), there are now two release streams. The Community stream (classic nightlies and such) and the "Pro" or "Cyngn" or whatever it's called now release stream. The most obvious example of this right now is CM10.2 on the Oppo N1 - you can't transition between this and community builds without wiping to my knowledge. It's not a big issue now but might be something you need to watch out for in the future.
Entropy512 said:
If people had to wipe every time they flashed an updated, nightlies wouldn't be as popular as they are now.
In general:
1) If you're coming from another project (CM to Omni or vice versa, or any of those to/from stock) you'll need to wipe. Titanium Backup and/or even Androids 'adb backup' can save a lot of time here
2) If you're coming from a previous version of the same project (An unofficial CM build to official nightlies, and subsequent nightlies) you should only have to wipe if someone screwed up
2b) You can usually even do version upgrades this way - e.g. CM10.2 to CM11, although of course this device never saw 10.2 except possibly some super-pre-alpha builds
One exception you may see down the line - with the formation of Cyanogen Inc (aka Cyngn), there are now two release streams. The Community stream (classic nightlies and such) and the "Pro" or "Cyngn" or whatever it's called now release stream. The most obvious example of this right now is CM10.2 on the Oppo N1 - you can't transition between this and community builds without wiping to my knowledge. It's not a big issue now but might be something you need to watch out for in the future.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok thanks for the informations ! After one hour of intense fighting with my computer, I finally unlocked bootloader, rooted, and flashed cyanogenmod I prefer this rom to the stock one, I find it more smooth, and more costumization
i think its ok for daily use. At least i use it everyday.
I posted this question in a couple other places, but no reply.
I have the GPE version of the Moto G, and I want to run the CM11 builds on it.
Will the fact that the GPE version has the ext4 fs on it prevent me from getting these to work?
I know there are recoveries available specifically for the GPE, but will getting the CM11 builds to work be just a matter of changing a few entries in fstab?
And finally, do either of the recoveries allow you ro format /data from either f2fs to ext4 or the other way around?
Thanks/
I've replaced stock Rom (4.4.2 US Global Version) for unofficial CM11 (2014-02-16's release) and for now CM works more stable than stock.
I had few reboots or issue with .flac, in CM's everything is OK, for now of course. Very good stuff even that is only nightly's release.

[Q] lets make a list of ROMS for TeamWin Recovery Project 2.7.1.0(kitkat Bootloader))

Can we start a list of sorts with Roms that work with the new bootloader?? so far i read that Dhacker29 has a few test builds of cm11 . i have one installed right now and it has some bugs but works and is faster than my hd has ever been . i can run this game i like and before it couldnt play without lagging now it runs crazy fast . anyway thank you Dhacker29 for the recovery and rom. i was reading another site and someone mentioned another dev that had a test build out for the new recovery but i cant for the life of me find or remember who it was. also how can i tell if a rom will work without trying to install it. i read that the kernel had to be 3.5 and newer or some shshhsh. anyway thanks in advance to anyone that responds
I second this. Was actually thinking of suggesting the same thing. Might help keep people from flashing the JB kernel Roms and asking what they did wrong. Least maybe a bit more.
>.>
almost forgot
heres a link to Dhackers Test rom that im using . it has a few minor bugs but all the hardware works soo
http://androidhosting.org/Devs/Dhacker29/msm8960/cm-11-20140619-UNOFFICIAL-RAZR-HD_M-KITKAT-TEST.zip
i hope its ok to do this anyway Thanks Dhacker29!!!!
http://androidhosting.org/Devs/Dhacker29/msm8960/
here's the whole directory with all his builds and where I think he adds them
I believe there is a PACMan Alpha out as well. Has the same bugs as CM11
cmh714 said:
I believe there is a PACMan Alpha out as well. Has the same bugs as CM11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i would love to have pacman rom on here!! i read that you cant downgrade your bootloader is this true or is that only apply to locked bootloaders?
JohnnyMcG said:
Can we start a list of sorts with Roms that work with the new bootloader?? so far i read that Dhacker29 has a few test builds of cm11 . i have one installed right now and it has some bugs but works and is faster than my hd has ever been . i can run this game i like and before it couldnt play without lagging now it runs crazy fast . anyway thank you Dhacker29 for the recovery and rom. i was reading another site and someone mentioned another dev that had a test build out for the new recovery but i cant for the life of me find or remember who it was. also how can i tell if a rom will work without trying to install it. i read that the kernel had to be 3.5 and newer or some shshhsh. anyway thanks in advance to anyone that responds
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any stable builds? Maybe some that use stock and then tweak it out.
i think you can install the stock files and then root and use a root app manager to remove all the bloatware from your phone. there is even a thread that tells you all the apps you can get rid of without jacking anything up. here you can check it out
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2756195
spapesh said:
Any stable builds? Maybe some that use stock and then tweak it out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
after root you can download xposed installer and then download one of the customizing modules and you can then change your icons in the status bar. nav bar, even alter the way your toast messages come in . anything you can think change the color of your wifi and 4g icons or change them to something entirely diff . here check that out too . you probably already know all this already but just in case.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/xposed/xposed-installer-versions-changelog-t2714053
JohnnyMcG said:
i think you can install the stock files and then root and use a root app manager to remove all the bloatware from your phone. there is even a thread that tells you all the apps you can get rid of without jacking anything up. here you can check it out
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2756195
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what I did. I was already running stock KK before rooting/unlocking. Still running it now but I removed a lot of crap. I'm looking forward to at least a few stable ROMs to try out on this phone, but I'm cool with this for now.
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk
Does anyone know if the available KK-bootloader roms work on xt925? I know the ROM unification for a lot of devices have taken place. I am not sure this also happens with the new KK-bootlader, or if we are back on the old xt925 vs xt926 compatability devide...
Thanks in advance.
idless said:
Does anyone know if the available KK-bootloader roms work on xt925? I know the ROM unification for a lot of devices have taken place. I am not sure this also happens with the new KK-bootlader, or if we are back on the old xt925 vs xt926 compatability devide...
Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not sure . you can ask Dhacker29 he is the one that made the recovery I think. or you can post your question in this thread and you might get a better response
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2776515
Here is a Gummy rom that supports the 3.4 kernel.
https://mobile.twitter.com/dhacker29/status/480220911225036800
Source: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=53609374&postcount=2913
So far I know of these Roms that are being developed to run on 3.4 kernel
CM11 Unofficial: http://androidhosting.org/Devs/Dhacker29/msm8960/
PAC-man Alpha 1: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2683962&page=3 I read mention that this works but I've not tested it myself
Gummy Rom Nightly: https://mobile.twitter.com/dhacker29/status/480220911225036800 <-- using this right now. Seems pretty good.
full list like CM11 unofficial http://androidhosting.org/Devs/Gummy/moto_msm8960/NIGHTLY/
NexesqueKK 0.01: http://www.droidrzr.com/index.php/t...2-droid-nexesque-for-razr-hd-beta-442-builds/ I saw on DroidRZR.com that there was a test for the 3.4 kernel but my attempts to flash it failed
Beanstalk Nightly (Kitstalk): http://www.droidrzr.com/index.php/topic/35880-rom442kit-katunofficalxt926-beanstalk/ flashed the 6-23 one on my phone.. Seems to be working
wow
I thought I was decent at finding info online but i couldn't find any of those threads except for the pacman alpha but for the life of me I can't find where to download the alpha build I can find the nightly n the 4.3 but alas no alpha maybe its under one of the devs tabs instead of the pacman tab idk anyway thanks a lot for all the great info
Jaysp656 said:
Here is a Gummy rom that supports the 3.4 kernel.
https://mobile.twitter.com/dhacker29/status/480220911225036800
Source: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=53609374&postcount=2913
So far I know of these Roms that are being developed to run on 3.4 kernel
CM11 Unofficial: http://androidhosting.org/Devs/Dhacker29/msm8960/
PAC-man Alpha 1: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2683962&page=3 I read mention that this works but I've not tested it myself
Gummy Rom Nightly: https://mobile.twitter.com/dhacker29/status/480220911225036800 <-- using this right now. Seems pretty good.
full list like CM11 unofficial http://androidhosting.org/Devs/Gummy/moto_msm8960/NIGHTLY/
NexesqueKK 0.01: http://www.droidrzr.com/index.php/t...2-droid-nexesque-for-razr-hd-beta-442-builds/ I saw on DroidRZR.com that there was a test for the 3.4 kernel but my attempts to flash it failed
Beanstalk Nightly (Kitstalk): http://www.droidrzr.com/index.php/topic/35880-rom442kit-katunofficalxt926-beanstalk/ flashed the 6-23 one on my phone.. Seems to be working
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gummy rom tested on my xt925. Stuck at unlocked bootloader sign. I don't think xt925 is supported yet.
Yeah I don't know if any have xt925 support or not. Hopefully they will include them eventually.
Gummy Rom
I recently tried Gummy Rom for 3.4 kernel. It was pretty good, but had trouble with bluetooth freezing the phone and wifi dropout at times. It has great progress, and appreciate those who are working on it. :good:
I have installed dhacker's 4.4 cm build from 24/6. Happy to report that it boots - and so far, at least - works great. This is on an xt925! It's the first 4.4 bootloader rom other than moto that I have got to actually boot up on this phone.
I installed gummy and have been using the auto updater running nightlies right now I'm running 6-24 build . it seems like the the previous ver. had fixed the screen dimming issue but it seemed to come back on this ver. but rarely happens I haven't tied Bluetooth yet and the popping/static sound issue is still there but other than that I like the rom . thanks for
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk
In droidrzr forums there is an Unofficial Omni Rom for kitkat bootloader..
btw, for xt925, dhacker says that we only need the new bootloader (maybe installing the leaked soak test from France we can use the newest roms)

Categories

Resources