What is it about using super slow androidfilehost? - General Questions and Answers

I've been enjoying a medley of roms through the XDA forums for a little over a year now. While I'm always appreciative of the hard work others do for the community, I often wonder, what is it about androidfilehost.com that makes it a popular upload location for so many people? The download speeds for me from this site (and its mirrors) are so slow compared to just about any other, which make it a bear for downloading large roms, and some uploaders go so far to upload there and request no one mirror/re-upload anywhere else.
I get that if you sign up for the site you would expect better speeds, but as a free upload site for distribution, it seems pretty mediocre in terms of speed. I'm not intending to knock the site or anyone whatsoever, just looking for some additional info on why a seemingly slow site is so widely used.

I'm sitting here waiting for a ROM to finish downloading from one of the androidfilehost mirrors and I'm wondering the same thing. It looks like there's 6 mirrors hosting the file I want, and all but one of them don't seem to download any faster than ~250KBps. One starts out close to 1MB but quickly drops to 300KB. I don't get it. Is there some kind of ad revenue or incentive for the people hosting their files there?

mitchellaneous said:
I'm sitting here waiting for a ROM to finish downloading from one of the androidfilehost mirrors and I'm wondering the same thing. It looks like there's 6 mirrors hosting the file I want, and all but one of them don't seem to download any faster than ~250KBps. One starts out close to 1MB but quickly drops to 300KB. I don't get it. Is there some kind of ad revenue or incentive for the people hosting their files there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the reason most use is bc its secure probably wont be shut down like some of the other hosting sites, and the amount of mirrors available in the states

I agree,
If the developers make money of the link to AFH than i understand, if not then i do not understand the uploads to AFH.
Now downloading 500mb rom wich is gonna take 2 hours to complete on a 100MBit fiberline.
Already had one disconnected download in the past,
3 hours!!!! of downloading and the last 1% it failed?
Unreal frikking slow downloads why not upload to usenet also?
I know not everyone has a payserver but it wouldt make it a whole lot easier.

standby... searching for mirrors....
I have been waiting 10 minutes for this to connect to a mirror. Haven't had any luck.
Tried:
Different browser
Different computer
Different network
Different file on AFH
Disabled Symantec
AFH is garbage!

Second that....AFH is very very slow and frustrating
I have tried downloading roms from there and now at multiple instances downloads failed after 50%. 50% of which was downloaded at speed of about 21 kbps. which is way less than any other download i do (above 300kbps).
Isnt it better to host ROMs torrents which way downloads can be better managed.
Please consider this.

Read this article:
https://www.xda-developers.com/androidfilehost-interview/

it sucks balls, but the benefit is at least the links stay alive for a loooong time. I'd prefer mega or mediafire, though
androidfilehost, sometimes I have to try for hours to download a few megabyte file, sigh

amakuramio said:
it sucks balls, but the benefit is at least the links stay alive for a loooong time. I'd prefer mega or mediafire, though
androidfilehost, sometimes I have to try for hours to download a few megabyte file, sigh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah! Mega will double the time of a download. Not worth it imo

Yeah.. I agree.. It continuously freezes, ROM downloads constantly fail with a network error, and Chrome always shows me a message of: "Your connection is reset."
I extremely hate AFH!! Mega or Google Drive would be much, much better. (Whatever, Google Drive is the best ever.)

felixlee0530 said:
Yeah.. I agree.. It continuously freezes, ROM downloads constantly fail with a network error, and Chrome always shows me a message of: "Your connection is reset."
I extremely hate AFH!! Mega or Google Drive would be much, much better. (Whatever, Google Drive is the best ever.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google Drive is okay, but not when you live in Iceland (i used to) anyways XDA should setup a torrent website, so they you can download files WAY faster.

TechNash said:
Google Drive is okay, but not when you live in Iceland (i used to) anyways XDA should setup a torrent website, so they you can download files WAY faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah.. sometimes torrent shows full download speed whereas downloading files in Chrome sometimes has speed drops, but I'm kinda worried about the negative effects of Torrent..
When I leave the seeding after the download is done, are my private files uploaded secretly to other websites?

felixlee0530 said:
Yeah.. sometimes torrent shows full download speed whereas downloading files in Chrome sometimes has speed drops, but I'm kinda worried about the negative effects of Torrent..
When I leave the seeding after the download is done, are my private files uploaded secretly to other websites?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That depends on the torrent you use.
Don't EVER use torrents that allow you to buy a pro version.
Try qbittorent which is free and recommended by many people.
If anything, try to avoid µTorrent as this will install bloatware along with advertisements and sharing public info.
Just do research and you will be a-okay. If you don't trust me for whatever reason use a VPN or a free anti-virus/malware like Bitdefender free antivirus edition.

TechNash said:
That depends on the torrent you use.
Don't EVER use torrents that allow you to buy a pro version.
Try qbittorent which is free and recommended by many people.
If anything, try to avoid µTorrent as this will install bloatware along with advertisements and sharing public info.
Just do research and you will be a-okay. If you don't trust me for whatever reason use a VPN or a free anti-virus/malware like Bitdefender free antivirus edition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm currently using Qbittorrent, and it works like a charm. It keeps me an excellent, consistent and stable download speed. I already know the disadvantages of utorrent such as dropping speed and worse stability, (and ads) so I changed to Qbittorrent as I read a blog post suggesting the benefits of using Qbittorrent. But I recently saw some articles that important files have been leaked out to the web when the seeding (100%) is turned on for a long time.
Files are still being uploaded from my PC when it is on.

felixlee0530 said:
I'm currently using Qbittorrent, and it works like a charm. It keeps me an excellent, consistent and stable download speed. I already know the disadvantages of utorrent such as dropping speed and worse stability, (and ads) so I changed to Qbittorrent as I read a blog post suggesting the benefits of using Qbittorrent. But I recently saw some articles that important files have been leaked out to the web when the seeding (100%) is turned on for a long time.
Files are still being uploaded from my PC when it is on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah! Well, my files have never been breached, but if you really are that paranoid, then right-click the file when it says 'seeding' and press 'delete.' A dialogue will pop up if you want to save your file make sure, 'delete file from hard disk' is not checked. (It isn't by default.)

Can't the staff apply a rule like "AndroidFileHost must not be the only download location for all your works" to all forum posts ?
It becomes insane year after year, I'm downloading around 50KB/s (I can go up to 1.3MB/s) and it even stops sometimes (and if I'm very unlucky it can completly crash too). I forgot to add that you can download... only if it finds a mirror for you (sometimes I have to refresh up to 3 times the page to get the only Québec available servers that are slow as f***).
Very ironic by the way to see in the XDA's website creator interview that he has created AFH because others were a bit slow.

iDroid27210 said:
Can't the staff apply a rule like "AndroidFileHost must not be the only download location for all your works" to all forum posts ?
It becomes insane year after year, I'm downloading around 50KB/s (I can go up to 1.3MB/s) and it even stops sometimes (and if I'm very unlucky it can completly crash too). I forgot to add that you can download... only if it finds a mirror for you (sometimes I have to refresh up to 3 times the page to get the only Québec available servers that are slow as f***).
Very ironic by the way to see in the XDA's website creator interview that he has created AFH because others were a bit slow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AFH and XDA are closely associated, being a Recognized Contributor, Recognized Themer or Recognized Developers here at XDA even gets you a free "developer account" with unlimited space at AFH just for being a recognized member. Obviously, the Recognized members would use that to store their developments and share their work here, just because it's convenient and free.
Sent from my LGL84VL using Tapatalk

Personally I think AFH as one of the biggest **** ever when it comes to download bigger files. It is not only slow but often breaks downloading. What a piece of garbage compared to the Google Drive.

Oh god, it's slower than dial up...
At this rate it'll take full 24 hours to download 1 GB, assuming it won't drop this download alltogether. There are no slower places to host a file in the whole world by now. Literally anything is better than that tarpit...
Oh yes, now it stopped completely for a whole 2 minutes without a single bit dripping from there... Great! Just great...
And it just keeps doing that.
_________________
And now it dropped before 100MB. Again.
AFH is totally and completely useless.
What's the use of being convinient for uploaders and developers when it's totally useless for downloaders? It's like dropping your work into a black hole, /dev/null

Anyone experiencing SUPER SLOW downloads today? Trying to get a 2.4 GB File and it looks like it might take a few days!! I would be happy to pay for pro if I was guaranteed to download off a faster server but it doesn't really specify that in their Pro Version.

Related

Rom Hosting: Where to host my rom (opinions)?

The two most popular choices I see here for hosting Roms and other files that can not be saved to the ftp seems to be Rapidshare or Megaupload. I personally would like to see some more people look into www.putstuff.com
A few positives I see compared to the other two are much faster download speeds, no download limit, no wait downloads.
Feel free to post your opinions and suggestions.
Thanks
Dont take it the wrong way. But are you affiliated with them in any way.
Torrents, rapidshare, and putstuff would be my votes. I can't stand MegaUpload (I can't tell you how many times I've clicked a link for something there and wait the 1 minute or whatever it is, only to be told I'm maxed (when I haven't downloaded anything) and I will NOT use their bar tool).
Torrents are very easy IMO
Rapidshare I can tollerate now that I found I can put http://anonym.to/? infront of the URL and it will work through my VPN (this does not work with megaupload).
Putstuff seems fine. I was sort of wondering the same thing if trojan9x has something to do with them. No biggie, but was something I was starting to wonder.
no, not associated with them.
I only found them about a week ago when trying to host a file for someone here (the faria 3.3 camera patch). It worked flawlessly so I wanted to share it since I never had seen anyone use it here before.
Anyone else?
I vote for every host other than Rapidshare...It's ip filtering and waiting time kills me...

SkyFire Browser Beta... Fully loaded PC desktop Mobile Browser

Engadget did a small feature on this really wicked awesome looking browser. It has the Kaiser featuring this browser. You can find that article here:
http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/28/skyfire-browser-for-windows-mobile-is-game-changing-does-flash/2#comments
You can sign up for the private beta here: http://www.skyfire.com/sign-up I suggest yall don't wait to long signing up as who knows how long this will be open.
Oh and so you dont wonder I didnt have a beta code and I signed up. I got this email back from them, "Thank you for signing up for the Skyfire private beta program. We will notify you when the beta version of Skyfire mobile web browser is ready for a test drive. We look forward to your feature suggestions, troubleshooting tips and ideas. Even with the early beta release, you'll be browsing the web on your phone just like you do on your PC."
I hope we dont have to wait to long for the actual ability to download this broswer looks cool.
OH and FYI:
From their Privacy Policy:
"Once you have subscribed to and begin to use the Browser, we will collect information about your use of the Browser on your Device (“Browser Usage Information”). Browser Usage Information includes such information as which websites and programs you access or download on your Device, how long you visit such websites and use such programs, your activities (such as products purchased or advertisements viewed) on such websites, which specific areas of a website or webpage you use and for how long, websites you bookmark, search terms you use, referring/exit pages, browser and platform types, the geographic location in which your Device is being used and information you provide on third party websites. All of your Browser Usage Information is stored by Skyfire under an automatically generated, random identification number (“ID Number”) that will not be associated with or linked to your Personal Information. Please be aware, though, that your Browser Usage Information, when viewed in the aggregate, may reveal your identity even if it is not associated with or linked to your Personal Information."
In other words, when you use our browser, we track everything you do, and assign an "anonymous" ID number to that information. And oh, by the way, the "anonymous" ID number may be linked to your identity.
I got the message on my phone tonight to load the SkyFire beta and I did. It is indeed very quick and responsive. One the plus side, it gives the entire page formatted in the shape of the screen. When you tap something to expand it, however, it seems to expand around the spot you touched, so in some texts the borders go out of the screen. Opera mini seems to expand but also format things a bit at the same time. Zoom is limited to two steps, in and out. Overall, pretty good impressions so far, and it does not seem to interfere with any other programs.
michalopoulosgk said:
I got the message on my phone tonight to load the SkyFire beta and I did.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I signed up last week and I still haven't gotten a notice..
DVS_WiNdz said:
I signed up last week and I still haven't gotten a notice..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me too. Grr, I hope I get it soon, I'm getting frustrated using the other browsers, knowing this is coming out.
Netfront 3.5 is out btw.
Dover said:
Me too. Grr, I hope I get it soon, I'm getting frustrated using the other browsers, knowing this is coming out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you guys check out the just released Access Netfront 3.5 beta... remember Netfront!!? and their lost-in-space 3.5 version. Well its out today.
I've posted a new thread on it in the upgrading/hacking section with its blog entry at Downloadsquad.com and its youtube video.
check it out here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=367105
AJ
Skyfire Browser
I got this today. I thought I'd share it with yall.
By the way, I'm using Netfront 3.5 right now and it's great.
Both browsers are nice, i'll give an update on them after a few days.
i get the system authorization invalid..
i dont get how they can tell if the beta was sent to me yet or not, wiered..
i guess ill just have to wait
Skyfire
When did you sign up? I signed up on January 28th. What do you think so far? Give us all your thoughts and tease us a little!! I wish I had it already, maybe it wont be long untill I get mine. Kevin
I am getting the same "system authorization invalid" error, any fixes?
sky
just downloaded,it trys to connect to the net then it says to reinstall. Any ideas??
thx
Intall
Mercury
Can you go to Skyfire web site and log in and check FAQ about install issues.
Thanks
this browser still has a ways to go, but it's a great 1st step.
it definitely has a ways to go. feels slow & unresponsive to me. plus it's server side rendering through a proxy and i don't want them to know if i'm looking at bigbootybutts.com or tracking my experience to target ads at me. I'll wait for the new opera.
wow. and it can play YouTube videos all by itself. not that I care, but I am amazed.
its a pretty nifty little browser
Hm anything about the "autorization problem"?
fb401 said:
it definitely has a ways to go. feels slow & unresponsive to me. plus it's server side rendering through a proxy and i don't want them to know if i'm looking at bigbootybutts.com or tracking my experience to target ads at me. I'll wait for the new opera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey man i hear opera 9.5 is server side rendering aswell i dont think netfront is.. can any one verify that?
lsdmt said:
I am getting the same "system authorization invalid" error, any fixes?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm having the same problems
fb401 said:
i don't want them to know if i'm looking at bigbootybutts.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aha another bigbootybutts.com fan!! I knew I wasn't alone
so i guess no one cares about the privacy policy they got going...

[Q] Verizon blocking File serving websites?

I was wondering if anyone encountered a problem with downloading files form file serving websites like rapidshare and megaupload.
I recently downloaded a file around 300mb off of megaupload using my 4G since my Wifi internet was too slow at the time, and now I cannot download anything from megaupload through my 4G anymore. It works fine using 3G or my Wifi connection. The webpage would load with the countdown timer and everything seems fine. When clicking on the download link a dialogue box pops up with a save option, but once i get pass that, the download doesnt start. It just stalls with "Waiting for Connection" Tried it with the stock browser, Dolphin Browser, and Boat Browser but none of them work. Tried clearing cache and history as well.
is verizon blocking these websites?
Any idea on how to get my 4G working on these servers again?
Thanks in advance.
I have a RapidShare account and I used to download all the time off there and megaupload as well. I haven't been able to download from those for several months. Mediafire still works though. Oh forgot to say RS and MU download fine when tethered to my laptop.
Sent from my Glitched MIUI Fascinate
Please use the Q&A Forum for questions Thanks
Moving to Q&A
I noticed this as well. I think they have some sort of software monitoring going on. Possibly examining the packets as some have said. I did a number of tests of larger downloads from the phone and tethered. My results were mixed. As a large download starts it downloads at full bandwidth, most of the time. Then at some point before it finishes the connection is cut off or dropped in speed. This happened about 7 out of 10 times. I would bet they have something monitoring large or max bandwidth use and then cut the cord. Just my guess from testing the download reliability.
You can long press the download button and it should say something like "save link as". I don't think it has anything to do with Verizon cockblocking you, but everything to do with how mobile browsers handle MU.
Sent from my Galaxy Tab running MIUI

Torrent ROM Downloads

Downloaded CM 7.2 RC1 today and found the torrent they posted. How would people here feel about torrents for ROM's on XDA? Could sure speed up things for people when a new ROM is posted.
With the way upload sites are nowadays, I'm game for anything.
I wouldn't mind either it probably would be a lot faster
Sent from my MyTouch 4G using Tapatalk 2 Beta-2
Im unfamilar with torrents. Do they work similar to on a linux system where you can enter a command and pull from someones github?
I agree, Id like to see some torrents. but from experience, you would probably need to have a good amount of seeders to have good DL speeds
aznprodgy said:
I agree, Id like to see some torrents. but from experience, you would probably need to have a good amount of seeders to have good DL speeds
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes this is true this would only work for the Hot top ROM's and only if people got into the game with it. I do hope some of the Dev's Jump in I would seed all the top ROM's right now with permission if given. This is not to replace the normal download links just to give people more options when sites like hotfile are dog slow or can't be reached.
I would love this. Not sure how to make one though. I use FrostWire (no, I don't download illegal music, don't worry ) for my torrents. They really do help.
Second this, i find torrents much easier expecially when internet/os is shaky. And UTorrent uses soooo much less memory than chrome
eqjunkie829 said:
Im unfamilar with torrents. Do they work similar to on a linux system where you can enter a command and pull from someones github?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wikipedia said:
Simply, a torrent is data about a target file, though it contains no information about the content of the file. The only data that the torrent holds is information about the location of different pieces of the target file. Torrents work by dividing the target file into small information chunks, found on an unlimited number of different hosts. Through this method, torrents are able to download large files quickly. When a client (the recipient of a target file) has initiated a torrent download, the chunks of target file that are needed can be found easily, based on the data from the torrent itself. Once all the chunks are downloaded the client can assemble them into a usable form. Note: the torrent must be completed before it can be assembled into a usable form. This differs from conventional internet downloads which have only one host and are usable even if the file is incomplete.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope that helps.
TL;DR: It basically lets you download the ROM faster than a conventional http:// download. You would have to use a torrent program, such as uTorrent or BitTorrent.
Also, to answer your question...no.
Torrent Fu from the market had been rock solid for quite a while. The remote login setting can be extremely can be handy when your on the move.
Here is sone info about the port forward.
http://torrent-fu.com/getting-started/

Am I the only one for which this site has become almost unusable lately?

The number of ads and scripts (flash, java, whatever) on each page makes my browser slow to an absolute crawl. They can take upwards of 30 seconds to complete (or give the "a script on this page is taking too long to load" message. Until that point, I can't scroll or do anything in any of my browser windows. And this happens on every page load. Every page of every thread on the site.
Do you think having 3 animated Comcast ads viewable on the page at the same time makes me more likely to click on it? The developer of this site might want to take a step back and evaluate how the ads are impacting the use of the site.
I know this is probably better or worse depending on which browser you're using, and how old your computer is, but it seems ridiculous. I don't know of another site on the web that has this significant of an impact on my browsing performance.
Just food for thought... All this is really encouraging people to do is run adblock and never see or click on any of the ads on the site. With adblock enabled, the site behaves like it should, and like all of the other sites on the web.
Dave
Have you tried different theme versions ? The xda 2013 beta ran slow for me as well, but changing it back to xda 2010 sped the site up by a significant amount. May of been placebo and me resisting change but either way it worked for me.
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
Use Firefox and download adblock plus problem solved. What's the issue?
As far as ads go, hate em or love 'em, people gotta' make money from them.
Just like the post above use Firefox with ad block plus and element hiding helper for abp.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
allyourbase said:
Use Firefox and download adblock plus problem solved. What's the issue?
As far as ads go, hate em or love 'em, people gotta' make money from them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Teraclips said:
Just like the post above use Firefox with ad block plus and element hiding helper for abp.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And use No - Script, it'll be a lot faster.
Sent from my GT-i9001 using xda premium
I'm aware of these options as solutions. However, should they really be necessary? As a web developer myself, I leave ads enabled in my browser because I have been compensated for people clicking on my ads in the past. But requiring your users to enable an ad/script blocker in order to be able to effectively use the site is pretty ridiculous. I guess I'm just venting about the sheer number of ads/scripts on this site in hopes that something may be done about it to make it more usable for those people that don't block ads.
I view this site on several computers (several OSes/browsers) almost every day. It is completely usable on some of them, and unbearable on others. I'm sure there are plenty of people out there (perhaps the people responsible for the site) that think the site performs fine. It does on some platforms. However, I want them to be aware that it doesn't perform well on all platforms. After posting this thread, I timed the point where I clicked a link, and when I was able to scroll the page (because the browser was hung). It took 17 seconds between the time the page started to load, and the time the browser came back to life. All but about 2 seconds of that was waiting for ads/scripts to settle down. The content of the page loaded almost immediately, but the flash ads hung the browser completely for almost 15 seconds.
I guess what is most concerning is how much worse it seems to have gotten within the last month or so. I'm not sure why that is (different ads, more ads?), but it has gotten noticeably worse.
Dave
dodgeboy said:
I'm aware of these options as solutions. However, should they really be necessary? As a web developer myself, I leave ads enabled in my browser because I have been compensated for people clicking on my ads in the past. But requiring your users to enable an ad/script blocker in order to be able to effectively use the site is pretty ridiculous. I guess I'm just venting about the sheer number of ads/scripts on this site in hopes that something may be done about it to make it more usable for those people that don't block ads.
I view this site on several computers (several OSes/browsers) almost every day. It is completely usable on some of them, and unbearable on others. I'm sure there are plenty of people out there (perhaps the people responsible for the site) that think the site performs fine. It does on some platforms. However, I want them to be aware that it doesn't perform well on all platforms. After posting this thread, I timed the point where I clicked a link, and when I was able to scroll the page (because the browser was hung). It took 17 seconds between the time the page started to load, and the time the browser came back to life. All but about 2 seconds of that was waiting for ads/scripts to settle down. The content of the page loaded almost immediately, but the flash ads hung the browser completely for almost 15 seconds.
I guess what is most concerning is how much worse it seems to have gotten within the last month or so. I'm not sure why that is (different ads, more ads?), but it has gotten noticeably worse.
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a thread for this issue: Intrusive ads? Post here!

Categories

Resources