Related
I'm just wondering why samsung uses 1.4ghz on the note 10.1 while the smaller phablet note2 uses a faster 1.6ghz. It make more sense to use a faster SOC on the tablet than on a phone.
Since Note 10.1 came out first, do you think got people willing to buy Note 2 (N7100), if the Note 10.1 is using 1.6 GHz and the Note 2 using 1.4 GHz ???
With all the new features in 10.1", I think samsung itself still confident to sell this Note 10.1" under 1.4GHz processor. The features is the selling point of this Note 10.1".
And if I'm not wrong, Note 2 will have the similar features with Note 10.1". Differences only on the processor, screen (which is AMOLED), and the Jellybean. So, that one will be the selling point from Note 2 again.
And don't forget, the launching within these 2 devices is very close. And I don't think Note 10.1" will get Jellybean until the Note 2 is released on the market.
:fingers-crossed:
mywingtophone said:
I'm just wondering why samsung uses 1.4ghz on the note 10.1 while the smaller phablet note2 uses a faster 1.6ghz. It make more sense to use a faster SOC on the tablet than on a phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because the Note 2 is getting released 2-3 months later than the 10.1, which gives Samsung time to get their chip production line ramped up enough to reliably produce 1.6 GHz chips?
does the note 2 and the 10.1 not have the same processor only the note 2 is clocked higher?
cyb3r5c4r said:
does the note 2 and the 10.1 not have the same processor only the note 2 is clocked higher?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They do I believe, just one is a little higher.
davidrules7778 said:
They do I believe, just one is a little higher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, just like the original Note - same CPU as GS2 except clocked 200 MHz higher. (Which shouldn't be difficult when you release the device 6+ months after the first device with the same CPU.)
if they hava same processor, i think v might ovrrclock to 1.6ghz as well
I already oc my note to 1600Mhz. Running smooth without problems.
Infact I didnt have to raise the voltage and the 1600Mhz was already set in the kernel.
I just unlocked the 1400 settings.
Sent from my GT-N8000 using XDA Premium HD app
i dont understand the issue here..
its the fastest machine on the market.
ngocdao said:
i dont understand the issue here..
its the fastest machine on the market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think its an issue really just explaining that all samsumg mobile quad core devices(note 10.1, note 2, SGS3) are using the same cpu and could all be potentially clocked to 1.6GHz
Samsung Galaxy S IV specs, granted its only a rumor...
http://techcrunch.com/2013/01/18/samsung-galaxy-s-iv-early-rumor-roundup-8-core-exynos-5-proc-5-440ppi-display-wireless-charging/
raishiro said:
Samsung Galaxy S IV specs, granted its only a rumor...
http://techcrunch.com/2013/01/18/samsung-galaxy-s-iv-early-rumor-roundup-8-core-exynos-5-proc-5-440ppi-display-wireless-charging/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No doubt. It's newer technology, but it doesn't matter if you OWNED BOTH
raishiro said:
Samsung Galaxy S IV specs, granted its only a rumor...
http://techcrunch.com/2013/01/18/samsung-galaxy-s-iv-early-rumor-roundup-8-core-exynos-5-proc-5-440ppi-display-wireless-charging/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If your penis is so small you need to compare a phone with your tablet.
Yes, then you got beaten.
I for my part never understood why anyone would need that power in a phone.
Okay maybe some people like to charge their device twice a day...
I laugh at everyone that say they are going to wait for the "ultimate phone".
You might as well just never buy a phone then, since not even 6-months later something WILL be better then what you have.
The only thing lately that hasn't been changing so fast in the tech world has been TV and Desktop computer parts.
My SLI GTX 580 setup (which is coming close to 3 years old), is just as fast as a single GTX680, if not faster in some cases!
raishiro said:
Samsung Galaxy S IV specs, granted its only a rumor...
http://techcrunch.com/2013/01/18/samsung-galaxy-s-iv-early-rumor-roundup-8-core-exynos-5-proc-5-440ppi-display-wireless-charging/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The note 2 already surpassed it in performance. I have both and I love my TF, but the performance of the note 2 is considerably better.
Beyond that the DNA(though I'll never buy HTC again) surpasses even the note 2 in performance.
I-Dig!
WOW... You said it all! Good one...
You will most likley pay 600.00 and a 40 year service contract wid the carrier.
Lets see, hmm, how long is my service contract with the TF700t... Oh yeah I don't have one.....
DarsVaeda said:
If your penis is so small you need to compare a phone with your tablet.
Yes, then you got beaten.
I for my part never understood why anyone would need that power in a phone.
Okay maybe some people like to charge their device twice a day...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Galaxy S4's specs are just speculation, but I am sure most of us here know that there are many devices that are CURRENTLY available on the market that can easily surpass the tf700 just by comparing specs. Tegra 3 was already outdated the moment the Galaxy S3 was announced. Just to name a few, any devices with Snapdragon S4 Pro and Exynos 5 (LG Optimus G, LG Nexus 4, HTC Droid DNA, J Butterfly, Galaxy S3, Note 2, Note 10.1, etc...) will surely give you better performance (both overall and graphical performance) than any Tegra 3-powered devices (including the tf700).
huy_lonewolf said:
The Galaxy S4's specs are just speculation, but I am sure most of us here know that there are many devices that are CURRENTLY available on the market that can easily surpass the tf700 just by comparing specs. Tegra 3 was already outdated the moment the Galaxy S3 was announced. Just to name a few, any devices with Snapdragon S4 Pro and Exynos 5 (LG Optimus G, LG Nexus 4, HTC Droid DNA, J Butterfly, Galaxy S3, Note 2, Note 10.1, etc...) will surely give you better performance (both overall and graphical performance) than any Tegra 3-powered devices (including the tf700).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all the samsung/exynos devices you mention there are Exynos 4 devices and those have the Cortex a9 cores as Tegra3, i guess gpu wise the Exynos 4 mali 400 could be faster
And if we speak now of a new 8 core exynos then i guess we also should speak that we have a 5 core A9 in our system!! the Exynos 4 of the Galaxy S3 is only a 4 core...
But thats all crap and marketing the Exynos 5 Octa is just a quad core you system/os will never see 8 cores only 4 just as we see only 4 and not 5
Verstuurd van mijn ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T met Tapatalk
DarsVaeda said:
I for my part never understood why anyone would need that power in a phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I remember people saying that about 1ghz phones. Then dual core phones. In 6 to 12 months quad core phones will be the norm and someone will undoubtedly say "There is no need for 8 cores in a mobile device".
pileot said:
I remember people saying that about 1ghz phones. Then dual core phones. In 6 to 12 months quad core phones will be the norm and someone will undoubtedly say "There is no need for 8 cores in a mobile device".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it will be a while before we get real 8 cores in mobile devices..
even the next arm chip: http://www.arm.com/products/processors/cortex-a50/cortex-a57-processor.php
is designed to be a quadcore setup in single processor (they do support clusters of those again but i guess thats for servers)
And we only get now the A15, Nexus 10" being the first, no phones yet.
jcompagner said:
all the samsung/exynos devices you mention there are Exynos 4 devices and those have the Cortex a9 cores as Tegra3, i guess gpu wise the Exynos 4 mali 400 could be faster
And if we speak now of a new 8 core exynos then i guess we also should speak that we have a 5 core A9 in our system!! the Exynos 4 of the Galaxy S3 is only a 4 core...
But thats all crap and marketing the Exynos 5 Octa is just a quad core you system/os will never see 8 cores only 4 just as we see only 4 and not 5
Verstuurd van mijn ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T met Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oops, I was thinking about the Nexus 10 when I was talking about Exynos 5. You're right, it should be Exynos 4 instead. Nevertheless, it does not change my point about Tegra 3's being outdated. For instance, when it comes to memory performance, Tegra 3 only has single channel memory controller as opposed to dual channels found in almost anything else (from Apple, Qualcomm to Samsung), a fact that is readily taken advantage of by Amazon when they introduced the Kindle Fire HD (TI OMAP 4 vs Tegra 3). Overall, if you follow articles on Anandtech about mobile SoCs, Exynos 4 gives you much better performance and more power efficient.
I was not aware of any sort of competition...
ShadowLea said:
I was not aware of any sort of competition...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently you don't attend the annual Mai Cawk convention.....
hx4700 Killer said:
Apparently you don't attend the annual Mai Cawk convention.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm a woman.
There are two types of electronic devices, experimental and obsolete. If you always waited for the next great thing you'd still be using a rotary dial phone.
gottahavit said:
The note 2 already surpassed it in performance. I have both and I love my TF, but the performance of the note 2 is considerably better.
Beyond that the DNA(though I'll never buy HTC again) surpasses even the note 2 in performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha true. Quad core exynos is very snappy. Games are smooth and had the better effects. ie. blurr effect on Nova 3, Modern combat 4. I havent felt the need to do anything to it besides root. My s3 now seems so outdated lol.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using Tapatalk 2
aznmode said:
haha true. Quad core exynos is very snappy. Games are smooth and had the better effects. ie. blurr effect on Nova 3, Modern combat 4. I havent felt the need to do anything to it besides root. My s3 now seems so outdated lol.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eh? The S3 has an Exynos Quad Core.... The one in the Note2 is 0.2ghz faster, but that's it.
Unless you're unlucky enough to be American, of course.
ShadowLea said:
Eh? The S3 has an Exynos Quad Core.... The one in the Note2 is 0.2ghz faster, but that's it.
Unless you're unlucky enough to be American, of course.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha ya American version s3 here.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
It got beaten by more than one phone, all quad core krait phones and the note II
Sent from my GNexus
ray3andrei said:
It got beaten by more than one phone, all quad core krait phones and the note II
Sent from my GNexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unless you start looking at the screen resolution, of course. Any Gamer knows that a lower resolution uses less resources, and thus gives more frames per second.
I just wan´t to collect some Opinions which one you like more.
sorry for my bad english
Is this serious surly JB is more and more better then GB.
GB is more stable than JB. If you are a gamer, i advice you to stay on GB
Sent from my GT -I8160 using xda devolopers app
For now, GB is noticeably faster than JB when it comes to games/navigating around menus.
On JB navigating through the system settings is pretty horrible, takes 1-1,5 seconds to get from one tab to another.
JB is more modern though, looks nicer, has a better notification bar, supports more apps.
I'd wait for an official, unbranded JB release before switching over.
No! GB is not beter than JB. When you have right settings on it , it runs few times better than GB. Definitely recommend to flash on JB
Ps. Best for now - MC8 + Italian Job + Supercharger V6 + removed bloatwares + DISABLE AUTO ADJUST SCREEN TONE ( in settings - display, this fix is for lag in games used on leaked versions and some new users don't know about it)
for me
gingerbread is alot better for gaming
but tooo ugly
the jellybean is opposite
weak in gaming and very nice
buhaha GB better in gaming...yeah go for it! Instal GB and come play with me in Shadowgun Deadzone or run Vice Ciy on full...GB have better ram management (now...) but gpu and cpu on GB is 50% slower.
No? Instal RD 3D benchmark. On GB ALLWAYS ON ALL ROMS you get 30fps overal score.
On JB you get 42-45 fps overal score and lern use fps.meter.
I have check some games in that same place/situation and ALLWAYS on JB is more fps. You can feel only droops because ram is not good now on JB but properly settings solved that problems for me.
michal89chz said:
buhaha GB better in gaming...yeah go for it! Instal GB and come play with me in Shadowgun Deadzone or run Vice Ciy on full...GB have better ram management (now...) but gpu and cpu on GB is 50% slower.
No? Instal RD 3D benchmark. On GB ALLWAYS ON ALL ROMS you get 30fps overal score.
On JB you get 42-45 fps overal score and lern use fps.meter.
I have check some games in that same place/situation and ALLWAYS on JB is more fps. You can feel only droops because ram is not good now on JB but properly settings solved that problems for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are we have different devices? I am always getting lags on ui also ram hunger games.
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda premium
Ram in games...sometimes are problems if you have less free ram but fps/s is a LOT better on JB
Try on GB with fps meter: Dead Triger on max, Vice city on max and Most Wanted and than on Italian Job 1.0.0 (with fps meter) You will see big deferences on JB+)
Praying for better fitted JB. ZTE blade gets 7k on antutu benchmark but we can't. ZTE is 600 mhz single core. Ace 2 800 mhz dual core. It makes me insane !!
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda premium
michal89chz said:
buhaha GB better in gaming...yeah go for it! Instal GB and come play with me in Shadowgun Deadzone or run Vice Ciy on full...GB have better ram management (now...) but gpu and cpu on GB is 50% slower.
No? Instal RD 3D benchmark. On GB ALLWAYS ON ALL ROMS you get 30fps overal score.
On JB you get 42-45 fps overal score and lern use fps.meter.
I have check some games in that same place/situation and ALLWAYS on JB is more fps. You can feel only droops because ram is not good now on JB but properly settings solved that problems for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what are the properly settings that can solve ram problems?
please tell us
...because zte blade run another one test hehehehe armv6 have not that sam test like armv7(b) Our device can get 20k on that test...why you compare so slow phone to ours in so bad benchmarks like quadrant/antutu. We have only one good benchmark (Rd3d) because that benchmark allways show that same framerate! Our one core is ~2 times faster than Zte blade. I had that phone before and I know what he can do after OC to 720/760 and CM7 and ...that phone have only good TFT(800/480) If you want you can get on zte blade 5k in quadrant after JIT becaus then quadrant generate bugs in graphics (all is white) DONT USE THAT BENCHMARKS to compare devices. Simply- stock S2 have in Quadrant 3k. Our phone have now on JB 2900+ so my device is fast like S2? NO.
Oh i dont know that point.
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda premium
S2 have similar score without OC .And what? My Ace 2 Is fast like S2? (...) No! Is ~2 times slower on GPU and ~1-1,5 times slower on CPU…
And we have better score than nexus
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda premium
If you have lags on JB in games try this:
1. Instal Kyrillosv7b (for MB4) or Italian Job v1 (for MC8)
2. Disable Auto adjust screen tone (Settings-screen)
3. Instal Supercharger for better ram management
4. Delete all bloadware apps (there is list somewhere)
michal89chz said:
S2 have similar score without OC .And what? My Ace 2 Is fast like S2? (...) No! Is ~2 times slower on GPU and ~1-1,5 times slower on CPU…
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i try quadrant i get 2433
its very different from yours
im running jb ij 1.0.0
any solution?
samer menla said:
i try quadrant i get 2433
its very different from yours
im running jb ij 1.0.0
any solution?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock firmware?
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda premium
abdulkadiro said:
Stock firmware?
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda premium[/Q
mc8 with italian job running nexus theme
thats all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is ok. That old Nexus is litle bit slower than Ace 2 on GPU because have higher res. and older ,slower one I/O
---------- Post added at 10:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:08 PM ----------
samer menla said:
i try quadrant i get 2433
its very different from yours
im running jb ij 1.0.0
any solution?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TMN sh.ts OUT, GPU 2d rendering ON, good launcher, auto brightnes adjust off, sounds off , no wigets, no animated wallpaper,, and 100x more solution. I dont have time for this...ask someone other or do a thread wheare people can write settings and chose one from them.
Edit: I am on IJ 1.0.0 also so you see right now differences. Settings vs settings.
Hi all, for those of you interested, I shot a video focus on the GT-I9505 performance while running cpu/gpu intensive games like Real Racing 3, Need For Speed Most Wanted, Asphalt 7, Dead Trigger, etc
http://youtu.be/Ibj_o5YahhM
Ciaoooooo
Very nice video!
One concern that I had, and now after watching this video is an even bigger concern, is gaming performance. Overall all games are somewhat lagging, I believe that this is due to the high resolution, that not only it has to process more pixels, but also requires additional video memory, which I believe is shared with the system memory.
I got very excited to buy this phone after S4 GE announcement, but now I'm skeptical, I have seen the Nexus 4 running games a lot smoother than this and I'm worried I will have to upgrade again soon in the future for a phone with a better GPU like Adreno 330 to be able to play newer games in 1920x1080 while the Nexus 4 could still play the same game smoothly.
What do you guys think? are you also disappointed with gaming performance?
sniperbr0 said:
Very nice video!
One concern that I had, and now after watching this videos is an even bigger concern, is gaming performance. Overall all games are somewhat lagging, I believe that this is due to the high resolution, that not only has to process more pixels, but also requires additional video memory, which I believe is shared with the system memory.
I got very excited to buy this phone after S4 GE announcement, but now I'm skeptical, I have seen the Nexus 4 running games a lot smoother than this and I'm worried I will have to upgrade again soon in the future for a phone with a better GPU like Adreno 330 to be able to play newer games in 1920x1080 while the Nexus 4 could still play the same game smoothly.
What do you guys think? are you also disappointed with gaming performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Frankly speaking, I'm disappointed for the whole performance experience with my GT-I9505. The whole system it's not perfectly smooth and there's some stuttering here and there. The same issue obviously happen during games, although it's not so noticeable.
To be honest, any device I tried with the recent Qualcomm architecture (I mean both APQ8064 and APQ8064T Snapdragon 600), screen resolution apart, was not completely smooth during games like NFSMW or Real Racing 3. And, just to give a term of comparison, I had: PadFone 2, Nexus 4, Xperia Z, Optimus G, HTC One and Samsung Galaxy S4 (GT-I9505). On Android OS, I could just see the Galaxy Note 2 (Exynos and Mali of course) running almost perfectly smooth Need For Speed Most Wanted. Then, I wouldn't be that worried about games and even more about general performances of GT-I9505. Samsung it's relatively new to APQ8064(T), then I guess it can only get better in the next updates.
Any game not running perfect on this phone just needs optimization that's all. The soc is relatively new in most regards, and aside from the mali-t6, has the most capable graphics card out there. The mali 400 used in the s2 through the note 2 handle every game just about prefect.
Swyped from a minimalist S2
how abouti9500 one and is it better:? they gave me this version im so sad and i forced to chose this phone
I think octa is more for gamming, gpu have more Power, some games really need optimizations
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
matheus_sc said:
I think octa is more for gamming, gpu have more Power, some games really need optimizations
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont think so
The 320 is on the same level as the power vr , according to some sites , the adreno is little bit better
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505 mit Tapatalk 4
Playing real racing and fpse and had never a lag and a slow down.
Most people which say s4 is slow use the crappy touchwiz interface.
I can tell you guys its not the phone or the hardware which is laggy,its just touchwiz.
Get rid of it and you will never have a lag,launcher redraw or a slow down anymore
Edit:
I run a superslim deodexed and pre rooted 4.2.2 rom and have no lag and perfect battery life.
Just try it guys
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2250824
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda premium
MultiLockOn said:
Any game not running perfect on this phone just needs optimization that's all. The soc is relatively new in most regards, and aside from the mali-t6, has the most capable graphics card out there. The mali 400 used in the s2 through the note 2 handle every game just about prefect.
Swyped from a minimalist S2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I think it's this and a combination of the Touchwiz interface and other bloated apps / processes.
optimising games for the phones hardware will increase performance in terms of average fps and that sort of thing but these random dips and microstutters we see are caused by background processes and services. Touchwiz is the main culprit but not the only culprit.
kamranhaghighi said:
how abouti9500 one and is it better:? they gave me this version im so sad and i forced to chose this phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 9500 uses the Octacore. It's a little bit more powerful than the APQ8064T you can find into the 9505.
On the other side, you will just have HSPA modem, not the LTE one. Only in korea for what I can remember, Samsung release an Octacore version together with an LTE modem.
If you don't need or you can't use LTE, you should have a slightly better device than the 9505.
Aratheba said:
The 9500 uses the Octacore. It's a little bit more powerful than the APQ8064T you can find into the 9505.
On the other side, you will just have HSPA modem, not the LTE one. Only in korea for what I can remember, Samsung release an Octacore version together with an LTE modem.
If you don't need or you can't use LTE, you should have a slightly better device than the 9505.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in iran we dont even have 3g we have 2g or edge that max speed is 10kb/s! that means 80kbps! seems they are alsmot same anyway i dont ahve performance probelms and happy whit my s4 expext I FORCED TO PAY a lot of money i was goign to buy nexus 4 they gave me wrong version (8gb) they told me w dont have the 16gb so i forced to chose that! btw it wroth screen is freakigna wesome and thin and light (i dont care about weight and thin!)
devgee said:
Dont think so
The 320 is on the same level as the power vr , according to some sites , the adreno is little bit better
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505 mit Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both have their advantages. Power VR can push out more FPS but the adreno has a better hexagon fill rate. The adreno 320is the newer chip and unfortunately many games are not optimized for it yet. The power vr on the I9500 is older and thus why some games will play more smoothly. If you try a game like real racing 3 you will see what I mean. However, a game like asphalt 7, both devices should handle well.
But why should Asphalt be no problem? I played it and it plays smooth Like it should. The game Epoch is running smooth but a simple game as carmaggedon has frame drop. Epoch is unreal powered and looks awsome.
Could this be because of optimizing games? I sure hope so. I love the device.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda premium
Did they disable samsung's "cheat" mode on the latest antutu version? The i9500 9505 and htc one scores are very close now. Here's my score compared against the standard s4 in their chart, which i think is the i9505.
what are your scores and thoughts guys?
tclocki said:
Did they disable samsung's "cheat" mode on the latest antutu version? The i9500 9505 and htc one scores are very close now. Here's my score compared against the standard s4 in their chart, which i think is the i9505.
what are your scores and thoughts guys?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want high Antutu 4 scores, just install the AOSP 4.3 rom in the original development section. Got 29k+ with it. The 3D score got a significant boost at least.
I'm not really into getting high antutu scores I'm just relieved that it looks like the boost mode has been turned off in this antutu version because as I said htc one, the lte s4, and the exynos s4 now have very close scores.
I'm still enjoying the stock touchwiz features so I don't think I'll be using the AOSP rom anytime soon. Thanks for the info btw, appreciate it!
I've noticed higher scores on the note 2 since the recent Antutu 4 update, which is nice I think they were underscoring the note 2 in hopes that you would sell the N2 and buy a new s4. Just my 2 cents though.
My I9500 gets 27017, also on stock TW and no root:
A few more runs and I'm sure it can hit 28000.
GT-I9500
GT-I9505G, running stock and rooted 4.3
Yo with my settings which is I clocked to 2052mhz and other various settings and my score was
28979
I freaked out when I saw it, by the way I do not know why it shows 2322mhz I think because thats the max Ktoonez kernel allows you to clock it, there is no way the phone will allow me to clock it at that and run antutu it will shutdown I have tried it dont you worry lol.
Anyway this is a MASSIVE boost for i9505 my max before on old antutu was 26768 and this was Extremely tweaked, now its just a few tweaks with the kernel, and done.
I also still am on old firmware I havent updated for over 1 month.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
Here is mine running on MIUI 4.2.2:
Sent from my GT-I9505 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
DELETE
stock not rooted 4.2.2 :thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I9505
Mine 28532 with:
GPU OC to 450Mhz
CPU OC to 2100Mhz
(Faux Kernel + GE 4.3 slim)
I get 2700-2800 in antutu on my i9505 running stock Clock speeds and bioshock kernel on 4.2.2 TW. Guess we officially beat the i9500 now. XD
hi , how do you have scores as high ??? , me I have 22257pts on WanamLite 1.5 and the last AdamKernel
Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9505 en utilisant Tapatalk 4
krz_ayman said:
hi , how do you have scores as high ??? , me I have 22257pts on WanamLite 1.5 and the last AdamKernel
Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9505 en utilisant Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't give a damn about it. Antutu is meaningless and worthless as hell. But yeah, Adam has lower score than stock, not sure what's the reason. You can flash stock if you wanna see a high score. Also another very important factor is device temp and also ambient temp. I live in India, and average room temp is ~29-30°C here, and my score on stock kernel variate's between 25500-27800. People in colder temperature will get higher scores definitely. You might wanna run it after the phone had some rest (at least half an hour), that'd make a difference.
tclocki said:
Did they disable samsung's "cheat" mode on the latest antutu version? The i9500 9505 and htc one scores are very close now. Here's my score compared against the standard s4 in their chart, which i think is the i9505.
what are your scores and thoughts guys?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Scored 28007 on my i9505.
Weird that the i9500 is scoring so low.
We all know the Samsung Exynos 5 Octa is more powerful than the Qualcomm S600, so there is something VERY odd going on with AnTuTu, my I9500 averaged 28100, now it gets 27000 at best.
POLO_i780 said:
We all know the Samsung Exynos 5 Octa is more powerful than the Qualcomm S600, so there is something VERY odd going on with AnTuTu, my I9500 averaged 28100, now it gets 27000 at best.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right you're.. if we have 4.3 soon then I doubt i9505 would beat us.. and obviously if we overclock cpu and gpu that as much as devilpera64 have i9500 will beat the **** out of other phones. Just you wait till october and I assure you. I9505 will be behind us.
POLO_i780 said:
We all know the Samsung Exynos 5 Octa is more powerful than the Qualcomm S600, so there is something VERY odd going on with AnTuTu, my I9500 averaged 28100, now it gets 27000 at best.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nothing odd. Antutu is acquired by Xiaomi last month, and next thing I dont need to say... It's no longer a valid benchmark
Sent from my GT-I9500 using xda app-developers app
GUYS WHATEVER YOU DO DONT USE QUADRANT PROFESSIONAL BENCHMARK.
THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG WITH IT. ME AND MY BROTHER HAVE IDENTICAL GT I9500s
I RAN THE QUADRANT PROFESSIONAL FULL TEST AND MY PHONE CRASHED. IT WASNT BOOTING UP FOR ALMOST 15 MINUTES. BUT LATER IT BOOTED. IT WASNT OVERCLOCKED NEITHER WAS MY BROTHERS PHONE. NOW HE UNDERCLOCKED BOTH GPU AND CPU AND DID THE SAME. SAME THING HAPPENED TO HIM.
WHATEVER YOU DO DONT JUST USE QUADRANT PROFESSIONAL.
I admit gt i9500 has low score in antutu thats why I went to test with quadrant professional.