{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Samsung at CES Released the Display probably which will be in our next Flagship.
And what could that be other than the Galaxy SIV.
Thank
Arindam
What the hell is that?! It doesn't look like a ...
What the hell is that?! It doesn't look like a flagship to me...
A Nokia Lumia like with some curves ....I like curves only on women though
Thats not hell , Its the New Display from SAMSUNG.
WOW
this is not even a phone prototype ,just a few images running in loop. good screen tech though, i love flexi
OP is exercising wishful display thinking.
That's just to show off the flexible display, not a prototype S4, if it was they would have announced it at the same time.
I love the technology of flexible displays but I just can't see the benefits in this prototype. Seems like it's being added to the phone because they can.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Lol.
Not even close to S4
They are simply showing off OLED Flexible screen which seems pointless...
i would post a proof that it's S4 or better change that "official" title...
This is the screen demo buddy. But in the video, the way the Widget menu has been shown , I m going mad to hold this in my hands.
qavro said:
i would post a proof that it's S4 or better change that "official" title...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly, wtf is with official being in the title, there is nothing official here.
Some people don't understand what official means.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
http://www.theverge.com/2013/1/9/3855960/samsung-flexible-oled-phone-prototype-hands-on
Please check the Video where the Prototype uses this display as well as the Widgets can be seen in the middle of the video.
OFFICIAL means, that this Pictures and Videos are released by SAMSUNG at CES , so they are not fake.
Hope everyone understands it now.
Much better title now...
@BALA............At the 10th Second of the Video, the Demo Guy says something, Please liten to the ENGLISH Word, whether its a Prototype or not ?
I guess I am not that a Noob to post fantacising Titles for Misguiding people here after a Long stay.
One More Video by CNET:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SyKPULw73A
Another Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLYlJ8vmKWE
It's cool, granted, but I doubt it's the Galaxy S IV. Surely they can't link this to the S range; it's a completely new design. It should be called the Galaxy Flex (maybe I should get that trademarked?)! Unless Samsung are as stupid as Apple are with their naming conventions?
sunnylovesalman said:
@BALA............At the 10th Second of the Video, the Demo Guy says something, Please liten to the ENGLISH Word, whether its a Prototype or not ?
I guess I am not that a Noob to post fantacising Titles for Misguiding people here after a Long stay.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, i would still say its not a phone prototype, to call it as a phone prototype you need atleast a few more thing demoed along with the screen. the screen protype shown dont even run on a OS, its just a few frames of pictures looping inside the flexi display unit.
Scratch that – it's essentially a digital picture frame, which cycles through various images showing what the display can do and isn't running any sort of mobile OS. It's also lacking essentially everything else: camera, radios, and most other hardware features. This is very, very much a prototype to display one potential use of this sort of curved display.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
source
Damn....just got the sIII...now the sIV is coming? Always outta date...
Sent from my GS3 running "Illusion" and LeanKernel
Related
Very little info about it... but hey, pics are out
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
1.2GHz proccy
32Gb ROM
Gingerbread
frontfacing cam
4.3" screen
xenon flash
p.s all this is sketchy
source
Hopefully this info is true, which I doubt...
orb3000 said:
Hopefully this info is true, which I doubt...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol yeah, the specs are sexy.... but I don't understand why it is running ASOP Gingerbread???
it's beautiful
h3llb3nd4 said:
lol yeah, the specs are sexy.... but I don't understand why it is running ASOP Gingerbread???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because the phone is just a stock version
Lol it made me laugh how we can't see anything only on the last picture which is according to me the most important/interessant.
zyryck said:
Lol it made me laugh how we can't see anything only on the last picture which is according to me the most important/interessant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats cause they dont want you to see the version on the phone
The 3 buttons are something new to me.I know WP7 phones have 3 buttons but they don't look like this one (Unless there is another phone with the same buttons) so what's the deal here? If it's real I hope it has dual core
Well on the 2nd Picture, the HTC logo is very pixelated while the rest of the photo is sharp.. not very thrustfully
phizo said:
Well on the 2nd Picture, the HTC logo is very pixelated while the rest of the photo is sharp.. not very thrustfully
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you note the 4th picture, see the logo is missing, looks fishy, but can never be sure
Why it doesn't have sense?
This really doesn't make sense, (pun unintended )
They only recently released the desire HD so why would they have a prototype of a second one already working, the name is strange and very unlikely to be named that, aswell as the fact it doesn't fit in with htc's recent designs (this one being plastic and shiny where as htc tend ti make theirs metal and interesting), on top of it obviously running stock android with no sense, and if it was an upgrade why remove one of the led flashes? And some more things
Sorry to be a downer on all this
definitely shopped
contrary to the specs, it's actually running AOSP FroYo. also, that actually looks more like that Motorola tablet which was announced the other day, not too sure though. the HTC logo is obviously photoshopped, i think on the moto tablet there is a verizon logo. either way, it looks really dodgy to me.
its a fake.
whyelse are the pictures well in common and then at the frame of the phone there are pixels and also on the pic with the HTC logo only pixels on the right top compare it to the left top. So why are we even talking about this bad fake pics?
Yea... its obviously fake, I mean the Desire Hd was realeased about 2 months ago, so there isn't much sense in releasing this so soon. Plus its not running sense, but that might just be because its an early version. Though that Htc logo almost definitley photoshopped.
http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/16/samsung-galaxy-s-ii-us-carrier-names-revealed-atandt-attain-veri/
So not only do they have lame names, but SGS2 isn't releasing on T-Mobile, at least not now(but I hope it will eventually :/)
Ya, those names make me want to import an SGS2.
Yes I agree how can we "Function" "Within" T mobile when we cannot "Attain" the Galaxy S2............. this sucks............. and so does my pun......
Why dont they just leave Galaxy S2?
History repeats itself... just like the original Galaxy S naming scheme but this time more terrible.
Maybe Samsung is trying to ATTAIN more respect by imroving how they FUNCTION WITHIN? Maybe an ETA on May 24th?????
Also, T-Mo's absence an indicator of ETA and merger/buyout?
CAPTIVATED
oka1 said:
Yes I agree how can we "Function" "Within" T mobile when we cannot "Attain" the Galaxy S2............. this sucks............. and so does my pun......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That made me laugh
Wasn't a bad pun.
Yeah I do agree though, this sucks...lame ass names and no HSPA+ for T-Mobile.
So i wonder if this will be a better buy than the Evo 3d for sprint users now. May have to change phones again.
These are funny names.
Just like everything else, they're running out of names. Samsung basically uses the same name for most if not all of their Android devices. Galaxy, and then just add a couple of words at the end of it. The next Galaxy is probably going to be called the Samsung Galaxy Burger.
cant wait for the Verizon Function
Spirit Within?
oka1 said:
Yes I agree how can we "Function" "Within" T mobile when we cannot "Attain" the Galaxy S2............. this sucks............. and so does my pun......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It made my laugh. I agree. The names are awful.
I really couldn't care less about the names ... I really want the VZW one to be LTE capable.
retarded names for sure. but tmobile will be ok, getting the gs2's bigger brother. from tmonews:
The boys over at Thisismynext.com are running quite the scoop with codename “Samsung Hercules.” With a possible arrival date of August this one has some time to mature but the Thisismynext crew has quite the spec breakdown:
4.5″ 480 x 800 Super AMOLED Plus display
Android 2.3
NFC Support
42Mbps HSPA+ capable (category 24 HSDPA and category 6 HSUPA)
AWS plus 850/1900 MHz…they claim support for AT&T’s 4G will be here if the merger succeeds which interesting considering this phone is scheduled for August and the deal won’t close till next year?
Preliminary measurements of 5.16 x 2.76 x 0.37 inches, resembles the AT&T Infuse 4G
16GB internal ROM, 1GB internal RAM, expandable microSD memory up to 32GB
Qualcomm 1.2GHz dual-core APQ8060 processor??
8 megapixel camera with 1080p video capture and front facing camera for video chat
Micro USB transfer for HDMI
These are certainly some impressive specs and if they come to fruition will make for quite the beastly phone. This might be why Thisismynext claims this phone is tagged for the “over $350″ price category. Let’s see how this one develops.
bluetoothless said:
Maybe Samsung is trying to ATTAIN more respect by imroving how they FUNCTION WITHIN? Maybe an ETA on May 24th?????
Also, T-Mo's absence an indicator of ETA and merger/buyout?
CAPTIVATED
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
LOL.
Anyway,
It's Hercules on T-Mobile i heard. (A lot less lame)
This is a tool that give you an idea of the relative sizes of a phone
I shown the sizes of phones from a IPhone 4s to the Galaxy Note
You can do your own comparison at : www.phone-size.com
Have fun....
Btw, I was amazed at how small and how Heavy the Iphone is.
wow the G Notes is gigantic!
Like i said before, i can wrap my SGS2 pinky to thumb. Hopefully it's big enough for Galaxy Note
Great tool thanks!
very nice, thx.
The xperia ray is soo tiny.
wtf with Galaxy Nexus. Phones getting bigger and bigger .. soon we may see again sth like this
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Oh, no !
The Galaxy Nexux is also smaller than the Galaxy Note.
Sweet stuff, could definitely come in handy when looking into a new phone
It is just the size, I mean you could go to the store and check out how it feels, etc.
really good man.. nice,..
Thes1ev said:
wtf with Galaxy Nexus. Phones getting bigger and bigger .. soon we may see again sth like this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hahahaha thats a good one!!!
Thanks for sharing mate. Really interesting Site.
Thes1ev said:
wtf with Galaxy Nexus. Phones getting bigger and bigger .. soon we may see again sth like this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You want to see the size of the Galaxy Note then! (Awesome device btw)
Also a 7" "phone" has already been done by Samsung - the Galaxy Tab (well not if you lived in the USA, but here in Europe you could call people on it). But it doesn't fit in trouser pockets like a phone should whereas the Note does I'm thankful to say.
And what with the 7.7", 8.9" and 10.1" tabs and the rest of their phones Samsung has covered pretty much every screen size from 3"-10"!
There are missing phones. Some old ones and other new ones that you should add e.g. Xperia X10 Mini Pro.
Thanks for posting this. I was considering upgrading my Droid Inc to an Inc2 but after looking at them realized that the resolution is the same.
droid 3 .
Good find. Been looking for this kind of info.
4.0 or 4.3 would be nice.
holy crap the galaxy note is gunna need 2 hands :3
Any thoughts on Samsung separating from Google(Andrioid) on the SGSIII? If this is true....WOW!
http://www.slashgear.com/tizen-ui-leaks-ahead-of-samsung-i9500-debut-09207578/
http://www.gsmarena.com/screenshots_of_tizen_meego_successor_leak-news-3634.php#
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
It looks so much like Android.
I'm confused. This may sound like a separate topic but, since Android is open source, does it mean that I can copy it over and change it around and call it MyMobileOS and sell it for money?
Is what XiaoMi phone is doing legal? They just take Google's code and change it around and massively put it on their own phones and sell for money?
nvm. wrong post
i dont like this, if samsung does this, i will just go for the iphone 5.. enough said.
Yeah, finally they have quality products, if they do this...wow
Certainly will be a huge change of OS . . Its ok. . SGS2X will last awhile .......
HRodMusic said:
i dont like this, if samsung does this, i will just go for the iphone 5.. enough said.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go get your iPhone. I rather have a r225
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
synergeticink said:
Any thoughts on Samsung separating from Google(Andrioid) on the SGSIII? If this is true....WOW!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah my thoughts are I wont buy it.
If anything they will release a phone with this and another equally speced phone with android. No way they are completely abandoning android.
i will definitely move on to the iPhone, or even a wp7 phone if this happens
There are other good android phones,htc anyone?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
bartoloandre98 said:
There are other good android phones,htc anyone?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HTC screens are garbage. I personally think that if Samsung was to go ahead and make this move without continuing to release any Android phones then that would be a negative decision on their part financially.
-We do what we must because we can; for the good of all of us, except the ones who are dead-
cashyftw said:
i will definitely move on to the iPhone, or even a wp7 phone if this happens
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U would leave android because sammy did?
I seriously doubt the SGSII will have anything but android on it but I certainly don't doubt them making a phone with another OS. look at how many android phones sammy makes. you think they will stop all that?
Tizen is also open source - so you should not pay any money to have it. And looking into the source code - all of the drivers are under Apache License with Samsung as owner. We will probably see Samsung running Tizen soon. Not to mention that Intel is supporting the project hoping that they may enforce x86 instead of ARM processors arch (the same way they are forcing Thunderbird instead of USB). Android got one major flaw - that's the java virtual machine or I should say Oracle.
Looks like a Touch Wiz OS. Low end devices most likely, similar to Bada.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
I_am_Error said:
HTC screens are garbage. I personally think that if Samsung was to go ahead and make this move without continuing to release any Android phones then that would be a negative decision on their part financially.
-We do what we must because we can; for the good of all of us, except the ones who are dead-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh c'mon with the exaggeration.. they're a far cry from 'garbage'!
Samsung screens are nice but the colours (from what I have seen personally) are over saturated in comparison to others such as HTC, which have more natural colours, something a lot of people appreciate.
My best friend has a GS2 and while his screen is nice, it's also tinted yellow because the colour temperature is way off, so the colours on my 1 year old Desire HD actually look better. He's not alone either there's a 200+ page thread on it. Then there's the banding issues people are having on the Galaxy Nexus and Galaxy Note displays.
What I'm getting at is all current screens have their downsides but they're all far from being garbage.
i think that's a new incarnation of BADA OS
It's a bada os, but it'll be open-source this time.
I don't know who need this... Bada failed, Tizen will fail too.
This would be a HUGE mistake. Right now, people love Android, and some of us have quite a bit of money invested in apps and other things. I don't see many devs jumping ship either...
So I just saw this article about the Vertu TI - that will cost approx $10,700.
Starts at 7,900 euros, or about $10,700
Specs:
TI a 3.7-inch touchscreen,
a dual-core 1.7GHz Snapdragon S4 processor,
and an 8-megapixel camera.
There’s also NFC and 64GB of internal storage, plus a front-facing webcam.
Clearly the reporters don't know much because they stated that it is Up-to-date with the OS running ICS
"Luckily, Vertu is mostly up-to-date on Google’s OS. Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich is installed and it’s smooth and speedy:"
According to reports " the TI is gorgeous, understated, and elegant, while remaining purposeful and unique"
Honestly I think it looks hideous. Esp with that price for the phone it better be made of gold.
Sources
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Re: Willing to spend 10,700 for an android?
Looks incredible!
That logo on the clock is very very sueable at this moment. Looks exactly like the vmoda logo.
Sent from my SGH-T999 using xda app-developers app
I'd love to see a system dump from this so we could at least rip off the theming.
grimez said:
I'd love to see a system dump from this so we could at least rip off the theming.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why would you need this? this looks absolutely ugly compared to stock android
I'd totally buy if i had the cash, and use it as a phone for leisure, would go well with my GS3, IMO.
Great to see a Vertu smartphone running a post-2010 OS, they were really being held back by Nokia and Symbian.
I think it is realy weird they don't use a propper Hardware for that amount of money and at least Android 4.1.x for a new Device
Campi86 said:
I think it is realy weird they don't use a propper Hardware for that amount of money and at least Android 4.1.x for a new Device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. For the price, it seems to fall short on a lot of aspects. They should at least provide something worth the cash (equal to the specs of a mid-high end computer) rather then attempting to exploit people :/
Vertu again? Oh I remember those days when they modified and tried to sell some obscenely overpriced Nokia back in the days when nokia ruled.
Silly ... And by the way, this one here looks kinda ugly and those buttons look really cheap.
Wherever there is lots of money, bad taste isn't far behind...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
I think it is really weird they don't use a latest Android and proper hardware too for such a high priced phone.
They should try to provide something worth for money.
I dont like it
Absurd is the first word that comes to mind for me.
Anyone seen a video of the "unique" interface? I'm interested to see what they did to android to partially justify the outrageous cost.
That phone is fugly!
No just no
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2
This is a phone for russian millionaires. They dont even buy underwear if it costs less than 10,000 $
R: Willing to spend $10,700 for an android?
Nooo
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app
spend 10,700?
it's ugly , I don't want to spend money, and i don't have enough to eat......:fingers-crossed:
Wow
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2