quadrant results problem - Optimus One, P500, V Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Hey. I have standard Gingerbread 2.3.3 no brands. I root, clockworkmod and kernel 2.6.35.14 candied(Ice) v2.5.8. OC 245/710. Results in Quadrant standard: total 590. cpu: 590, pam: 723, we/wy: 445, 2d: 665, 3d: 515. Why so low? others have more than 1,000 total. No matter what kernel and custom rom eg: CM7, is the result of a similar. what's wrong? I do not I have a turned on? help me.

Quadrant result or any benchmarks result are not really accurate.
Sent from my LG-P690 using xda premium

allenwalker1998 said:
Quadrant result or any benchmarks result are not really accurate.
Sent from my LG-P690 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the point is that others have exactly the same rom and kernel with higher scores

xander21 said:
Hey. I have standard Gingerbread 2.3.3 no brands. I root, clockworkmod and kernel 2.6.35.14 candied(Ice) v2.5.8. OC 245/710. Results in Quadrant standard: total 590. cpu: 590, pam: 723, we/wy: 445, 2d: 665, 3d: 515. Why so low? others have more than 1,000 total. No matter what kernel and custom rom eg: CM7, is the result of a similar. what's wrong? I do not I have a turned on? help me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you put any trust in Quadrant scores you could use them to prove that dancing naked for 5 minutes in your garden affects device performance- By Chainfire

ashishv said:
If you put any trust in Quadrant scores you could use them to prove that dancing naked for 5 minutes in your garden affects device performance- By Chainfire
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
really true.

Related

Post your quadrant score here

Please share your benchmark scores.
Sent from my X10i using Tapatalk
I get 1397 running Cog v2.3b2...although I don't think Quadrant scores mean much.
About 1900 using Froyo beta and OCLF. That's about double what I was getting pre-OCLF. There is a perceivable speed increase as well.
1503 on cog 2.3b3
2139 with DRS 3.0 + jfs overkill + 1.2ghz
909 stock 2.1
2342 on jm1 with oclf.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
2300-2575, jf7, unhelpful kernel 1.4.1, 1224mhz cpu. 226.780mhz gpu with some undervolting, tayatama lagfix, could do better with one click lagfix if i had tried it and changed the scheduler and minfree settings. about 9mflops in linpack.
2100-2465 cog2.3b1 (jj4 froyo based) setiron kernel. 1200mhz cpu ???gpu -50mv lowwer freqs -75mv higher freqs cfq scheduler, universal lagfix no rfs overkill jfs setting bind mounts disabled. 17.299 mflops in linpack
lol @ quadrant scores being taken seriously.
what is a quadrant score? does it defy gravity? does it make me uber cool and get chicks like axe? does it make my internet penis bigger? what do i do with quadrant score?
Pvster said:
what is a quadrant score? does it defy gravity? does it make me uber cool and get chicks like axe? does it make my internet penis bigger? what do i do with quadrant score?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A number that means just as much as the amount of times you've picked your nose during your lifetime.
Pvster said:
what is a quadrant score? does it defy gravity? does it make me uber cool and get chicks like axe? does it make my internet penis bigger? what do i do with quadrant score?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no, certainly not, yes and you brag because it doesn't really mean anything, quadrant is a good benchmark if you ignore the file system score and you compare the component scores individually, you can only do that if you have the pay versions, the composite score is about as useful as a screen door on a submarine 'cept for bragging rights. i show it off to evo and droid x owners who obviously dont know any better and have never heard of a captivate. i also show off fps in nenamark.
warning this will definitely not get you girls. not even the nerdy gamer chicks.
Noob alert! How you get the score? Lollipop!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
by downloading quadrant from the market and running a test on your phone which then compares your score to what all of the heavy hitter android phones out right now.
Pvster said:
what is a quadrant score? does it defy gravity? does it make me uber cool and get chicks like axe? does it make my internet penis bigger? what do i do with quadrant score?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most standalone benchmarks are not real useful for real world comparisons but that doesnt mean we cant post them for ****s and giggles.

Your MT4G performance, and benchmarks.

Thought I would start a thread, where people can see how their MT4G stacks up against others. People can post their benchmarks and say what ROM they are running, where they have their processor clocked, etc....
Anyways, I attached my screens, I am running cm7... the benchmark test I just ran, was clocked at like 1.4GHz on cm7.
The quadrant is back when I was running an alpha, clocked at 1.2GHz
Best Quadrant Score seen so far: Unknown(Looks like CM7)
Best LinPack: Iced Glacier v1.1.6 OC at 1.7ghz
Best SmartBench: Cm7, OC at 1.3ghz
I don't have a pic but one time a month a go I was on miui and got 62 on linpack and 2900 on quadrant I was overclocked to 1.8ghz and managed to get a couple off before the phone froze up. You can see me on the high scores list on linpack website its Joe from bremerton
Sent from my icey cold glacier 4g freezing every phone in its path
jriv said:
I don't have a pic but one time a month a go I was on miui and got 62 on linpack and 2900 on quadrant I was overclocked to 1.8ghz and managed to get a couple off before the phone froze up. You can see me on the high scores list on linpack website its Joe from bremerton
Sent from my icey cold glacier 4g freezing every phone in its path
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I see...haha nice. Too bad it was freezing up
Ya I knew it wasn't gonna be stable just wanted to see if I could crack the top 10
Sent from my icey cold glacier 4g freezing every phone in its path
Mine is just a regular factory MT4G. No root, no OC no hacks of any kind.
Still waiting to see someone else on stock/factory meet or beat this
HTCMDA said:
Mine is just a regular factory MT4G. No root, no OC no hacks of any kind.
Still waiting to see someone else on stock/factory meet or beat this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is nice for factory..if it truly is non hacked...very nice.
HTCMDA said:
Mine is just a regular factory MT4G. No root, no OC no hacks of any kind.
Still waiting to see someone else on stock/factory meet or beat this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Impressive with factory MT4G. I get 1700-1800.
Most of these bench mark tools have not been updated to cm7 or 2.3 GB. Quadrant does not run well at all and some times show a black screen on 3D test, or locks up. Linpack seems to be working though.
Just FYI if you are using cm7 Android 2.3
bobsbbq said:
Most of these bench mark tools have not been updated to cm7 or 2.3 GB. Quadrant does not run well at all and some times show a black screen on 3D test, or locks up. Linpack seems to be working though.
Just FYI if you are using cm7 Android 2.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, but I thought benchmark 2011 or whatever the name is, was accepted as a more accurate marker..?
EDIT: SmartBench 2010 is what app I am talking about.
test was run at 1.6 and i stuck it in the freezer while running the test...
My phone is a taiwan version, with a good screen.
do you run quadrant back to back to get 1700-1800?
you should always toss the 1st one, as the processor isn't running at full speed ( at least i don't think so) because all tests after the initial one are always higher.
but the 2060 was my 2nd test after installing the app.
and too, that was like the only app i had installed at the time.
Hahah
brianphanz0r said:
test was run at 1.6 and i stuck it in the freezer while running the test...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my MT4G running Gingerbread
No freezing here. O/C @1.7
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
I'm running CM 6.1.2 RC2 w/ Grankin's kernel.
Best Quadrant score I've got so far when overclocked to 1.8Ghz is 3114.
It runs stable but sucks the life out of the battery.
For every day use, I have it on 1.2Ghz.
I can't link to the outside since this is my 1st post... (there goes the cherry)
Here's a screenie anyway:
pacstudios.com/snap20110120_164921.png
Jaskwith said:
Best Quadrant Score seen so far:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=10719358&postcount=14
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 3100 with cm a few times.
Running CM6.1.2RC2
Over Clocked to 1.5Ghrz
Iced Glacier v1.1.6 OC at 1.7ghz
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
quadrant score
my quadrant score : )
I'm getting 2390 on quadrant with my phone oc'd to 1.4ghz and running the latest version of Iced Glacier ROM. Zero freezing/reboots/lockups and decent battery life, decent battery life even with wifi/bluetooth/gps turned on and connected.

How come some phones get high quadrant scores?

Hey
I overclocked my Galaxy S and I did some tests in quadrant to see if my clock gave me lower performance.. Anyways I got 2950 as my best score @ 1.5 GHz but I see some HD2's getting 4400 in socre @ 1.5 GHz. I thougt my Galaxy S would get a better score then a HD2. Is it becouse the HD2 running a slimmer rom with less background processes or are they just lying?
I believe quadrant scores are heavily varying and dependent on the device, and for the most part, do very little to reflect "real" performance.
I don't have a straight answer, but I wouldn't worry about it too much. Your scores are still magnitude's higher than my Hero, my absolute highest (with unsafe tweaks to the clock and kernel) was about roughly 500
hey guzy....
sorry for the dumb question but...
can u tell ne what overclocking is......??? i'm new to android platform.....
Sent from my GT-S5670 using XDA App
maxcool12345 said:
hey guzy....
sorry for the dumb question but...
can u tell ne what overclocking is......??? i'm new to android platform.....
Sent from my GT-S5670 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclocking is just ramping up the processor in your CPU to higher frequencies for faster performance. There are limits, you can't go too high because you risk damage and overheating, and going too low can cause severe slowdowns and instability.
BUt finding a sweet spot for the minimum and maximum processor speed can result in a much faster phone when the screen is on and a way better battery life with the screen off.
nice.... n thanx.... how did it works.... is there any soft stuff(app) available for it or somethin else....????
Sent from my GT-S5670 using XDA App
LiquidSolstice said:
I believe quadrant scores are heavily varying and dependent on the device, and for the most part, do very little to reflect "real" performance.http://forum.xda-developers.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=14894469
I don't have a straight answer, but I wouldn't worry about it too much. Your scores are still magnitude's higher than my Hero, my absolute highest (with unsafe tweaks to the clock and kernel) was about roughly 500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah...Good old days!
Anyways,there are many many ways to cheat quadrant.Running the app from a ramdisk,patching SQlite,running a rom from SD(I think) all boost the scores.That is,however,because Quadrant relies heavily on I/O,which gives unreal scores.Remove I/O benchmarking from the test and you have a helluva accurate benchmark.Pretty good too.
But on the SGS,let me make my guess.Are you running Cognition rom?If yes,are you using interactive governor?Again,if yes,switch to performance governor and yay,4000+ points in Quadrant!
maxcool12345 said:
nice.... n thanx.... how did it works.... is there any soft stuff(app) available for it or somethin else....????
Sent from my GT-S5670 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately, it requires a custom kernel, which in turn requires a custom recovery (and in some cases, a custom ROM) to achieve.
ohhh crap!!!! thats the reason i want a forum or some dev to create interest in my device..... hey can u tell me somethin j shud do....????
w8 or shud sell my cellphone to buy somethin like optimus??
Sent from my GT-S5670 using XDA App
tolis626 said:
Ah...Good old days!
Anyways,there are many many ways to cheat quadrant.Running the app from a ramdisk,patching SQlite,running a rom from SD(I think) all boost the scores.That is,however,because Quadrant relies heavily on I/O,which gives unreal scores.Remove I/O benchmarking from the test and you have a helluva accurate benchmark.Pretty good too.
But on the SGS,let me make my guess.Are you running Cognition rom?If yes,are you using interactive governor?Again,if yes,switch to performance governor and yay,4000+ points in Quadrant!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im using CM7 with Glitch kernel. And I used "smartass" when I got the score but now I get like 2470 in score now even with performance. Plugged in the charger and now I got 2888 in score so I guess the charger helps a lot in quadrant to..
LiquidSolstice said:
I believe quadrant scores are heavily varying and dependent on the device, and for the most part, do very little to reflect "real" performance.
I don't have a straight answer, but I wouldn't worry about it too much. Your scores are still magnitude's higher than my Hero, my absolute highest (with unsafe tweaks to the clock and kernel) was about roughly 500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cannot agree more. It sure is fun showing around your quadrant score but a quadrant score never reflects true real world performance. Maybe, Neocore would be a better benchmark but then again non of these benchmarks would show how fast apps could load or how smooth you switch between apps.
I use an LG GT540 Optimus. I was able to reach 64.3fps on neocore and 1250 on quadrant after overclocking to some 800MHz with performance controller.
Quadrant also doesn't reflect the core memory/cpu usage. ie Sense UI eats more resources than vanilla. So, same phone running vanilla and sense will have different scores.
I believe Samsung uses TouchWiz. Perhaps, you could score better with a vanilla rom or cyanogenmod.
Last but not the least, Quadrant scores could be faked just as easy as you could fake version numbers in About Phone.
Lirkaren said:
Hey
I overclocked my Galaxy S and I did some tests in quadrant to see if my clock gave me lower performance.. Anyways I got 2950 as my best score @ 1.5 GHz but I see some HD2's getting 4400 in socre @ 1.5 GHz. I thougt my Galaxy S would get a better score then a HD2. Is it becouse the HD2 running a slimmer rom with less background processes or are they just lying?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant sucks use smartbench the sgs is one of the most powerful single core phone out there an smart bench proves it
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
Sorry for forum!
Jasonhunterx said:
Quadrant sucks use smartbench the sgs is one of the most powerful single core phone out there an smart bench proves it
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 10 characters
Sent from my Inspire 4G using XDA Premium App

to many kernals

hey guys i just need a little bit help here.
im new to the sensation
and i am running Bulletproof 2.2.1
and its very slow, and i even get a ****ty score on quadrant
and i see there are several kernals out there and i wanted to know witch ones are compatible with sense 3.5 bulletproof
and witch one is the best one. by best i mean faster overclocked
thanks in advance
You can try Faux or Bricked, both are great.
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using XDA App
Faux 0.2.3 is out soon with a whole host of new features, I've found that I can't get Faux 1.89Ghz version to work (boot loops) but it may work for you. Due to this I use Bricked kernel and then I can overclock (if I want to) up to 1.72Ghz which seems to be the max for my chip!
Here's a really good kernel 2.6.35.14-Bricked-v 1.2-gpuoc 320-ondmnd [email protected] #6 this is what I use and It's awesome so far I've been useing this kernel for three days and It's lighting fast
I'm on BP also and while quadrant is low with stock, I've found stock kernel to be smooth and stable. Today I did flash bricked 1.4, and while my CF scores and quadrant went up significanty, I had lag on homescreens and games like asphalt 6 hd. I have no idea what the problem was. It could have been my Rom, or the way I flashed bricked kernel because I have read so many positives with using bricked.
I went back to stock kernel and all is smooth again, but with low benchmarking scores....
So I guess I'm saying take benchmark scores with a grain of salt. Although it would be nice to have my cake and it too.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using Tapatalk
whats you quadrant score? i flashed that kernal but i had problems with 3D and he said he fixed it on the latest version 1.4. and when i used setcpu my phone kept rebooting
I don't remember my quadrant score, but CF bench score was really high with bricked 1.4, above GS2.
Now back to stock kernel my CF bench is back to around 5000. Just under the atrix scores.
(But with stock I have no issues with with gameloft games, no lag in asphalt 6 hd.)
I will probably try again in the near future as it could have been user error on my part.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using Tapatalk
Fk quadrant scores! It all depends on how ur phone is running
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
g1user101 said:
Fk quadrant scores! It all depends on how ur phone is running
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree!
Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using Tapatalk
gustav30 said:
I don't remember my quadrant score, but CF bench score was really high with bricked 1.4, above GS2.
Now back to stock kernel my CF bench is back to around 5000. Just under the atrix scores.
(But with stock I have no issues with with gameloft games, no lag in asphalt 6 hd.)
I will probably try again in the near future as it could have been user error on my part.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
talking about games i havent be able to play them on any rom. some says its not supported and somes dont have the 3d graphics on them
Do the current kernels all have these problems? I would like to know this before I get this phone. And I noticed someone OC'd to 1.8GHz, is this to fix lag or just for fun? Such OC would lead me to question the Sensation's speed quite a bit. Sorry for hijacking the thread, didn't want to make a new one.
Do the current kernels all have these problems? I would like to know this before I get this phone. And I noticed someone OC'd to 1.8GHz, is this to fix lag or just for fun? Such OC would lead me to question the Sensation's speed quite a bit. Sorry for hijacking the thread, didn't want to make a new one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am running CM7 SelfKang9, with Faux's AOSP 0.2 Kenrnel (1.78ghz OC) and undervolt (Thermal Patch). Everything is smooth as butter and battery life is beyond excellent (getting avg 6mA idle). If you're interested in benchmarks, I have gotten as high as a 6499 AnTuTu score, and a 7424 in CF bench. It does run fine at its rated speed of 1.5ghz, I'm just always gunning for that extra speed.
Edit: For Comparison, my friend has an Atrix, using CM 7.1 and Faux with a 1.3 ghz OC, and he was getting slightly slower benches (6000 AnTuTu). Although both phones run great.
I'm using pyramid3d 8.0.1 along with the bricked 1.2 kernel.
Runs perfect. No lags, and no other problems, although quadrant scores are really low. Quadrant really means nothing IMO.
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio Z715e using xda premium
pardoned said:
I'm using pyramid3d 8.0.1 along with the bricked 1.2 kernel.
Runs perfect. No lags, and no other problems, although quadrant scores are really low. Quadrant really means nothing IMO.
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio Z715e using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sense has a nice bug from HTC that affects Quad & other benches negatively, this can be fixed by using AOSP/CM/MIUI, I noticed this on my previous phones. I think HTC has some lingering debugging enabled in Sense.
Louer Adun said:
I am running CM7 SelfKang9, with Faux's AOSP 0.2 Kenrnel (1.78ghz OC) and undervolt (Thermal Patch). Everything is smooth as butter and battery life is beyond excellent (getting avg 6mA idle). If you're interested in benchmarks, I have gotten as high as a 6499 AnTuTu score, and a 7424 in CF bench. It does run fine at its rated speed of 1.5ghz, I'm just always gunning for that extra speed.
Edit: For Comparison, my friend has an Atrix, using CM 7.1 and Faux with a 1.3 ghz OC, and he was getting slightly slower benches (6000 AnTuTu). Although both phones run great.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for clearing things up for me, I was worried that the phone had speed issues and the OC was to fix that, now I'm not worried with that anymore. Hopefully I order mines next week, but I plan on undervolting & underclocking, just as I did on my MT4G. Although you benches have restored my confidence in the phone.

Post your Overclocks!

I openly consider the opinions of those who are for or against overclocking, I have heard both sides of the argument regarding its usefulness. Personally, I'm not fully decided. I respectfully ask we keep the thread on topic- posting your overclocks!
Here is mine with no noticeable heat or stability issues.
1.252 GHz
2791 Quadrant score
Humble 4.22
Imoseyon Kernel 3.10
Tegrak Overclock
I have heard people getting 1.4 GHz with the Charge, although I have heard of that some can't get above 1.2 GHz stable.
1.3 ghz Performance
EP4 Debloated
Imoseyon repacked kernel
Quadrant score: rape
Sent from my SCH-I510 using xda premium
kvswim said:
1.3 ghz Performance
EP4 Debloated
Imoseyon repacked kernel
Quadrant score: rape
Sent from my SCH-I510 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rape +7
1.3 ghz. Govoner is performance
Quadrant score runs at about 2700 3000 btw quadrantts do mean anything other than a bunch of stupid numbers
Sent from my SCH-I510 using xda premium
I go the opposite route. Rather than overclocking, I'm undervolting. It really helps battery life and doesn't affect your performance. I'm running stock clocks with -30mV across the board using Tegrak with the interactiveX governor on EP4 at the moment. Using StabilityTest from the Market in scaling mode to test stability. Going to try to drop the voltages down a bit more soon, as I've been fully stable for almost a week on these.
over 9000!
No way your over 9000
Sent from my SCH-I510 using xda premium
bfitzpatrickd2d said:
No way your over 9000
Sent from my SCH-I510 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure that was a commentary on the complete uselessness of Quadrant scores
nitsuj17 said:
over 9000!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pretty sure this guy was joking. Sounds like a line from a show. Can't remember the name though (it's over 9000!!!!!!!)
bvsbutthd101 said:
pretty sure this guy was joking. Sounds like a line from a show. Can't remember the name though (it's over 9000!!!!!!!)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dragon Ball Z. And yes, Quadrant is probably the least useful of benchmarks.
Sent from my SCH-I510 using xda premium
kvswim said:
Dragon Ball Z. And yes, Quadrant is probably the least useful of benchmarks.
Sent from my SCH-I510 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually find Quadrant useful for verifying lagfix and verifying over or under clocks.
One thing that overclocking allowed for was smoothing out 480p Flash video in the Browser that was choppy before.
Now that you guys vented your overclocking and Quadrant hate, back to the posting your overclocks!
*EDIT* Forgot to ask, does anybody know if there is an appreciable difference in battery life when overclocking at stock voltage? Theoretically, battery life should be the same no matter the clock speeds if the voltage is constant.
xdadevnube said:
I actually find Quadrant useful for verifying lagfix and verifying over or under clocks.
One thing that overclocking allowed for was smoothing out 480p Flash video in the Browser that was choppy before.
Now that you guys vented your overclocking and Quadrant hate, back to the posting your overclocks!
*EDIT* Forgot to ask, does anybody know if there is an appreciable difference in battery life when overclocking at stock voltage? Theoretically, battery life should be the same no matter the clock speeds if the voltage is constant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclocking without a kernel that supports undervolting probably scales the voltage up appropriately.
Sent from my SCH-I510 using Tapatalk
xdadevnube said:
I actually find Quadrant useful for verifying lagfix and verifying over or under clocks.
One thing that overclocking allowed for was smoothing out 480p Flash video in the Browser that was choppy before.
Now that you guys vented your overclocking and Quadrant hate, back to the posting your overclocks!
*EDIT* Forgot to ask, does anybody know if there is an appreciable difference in battery life when overclocking at stock voltage? Theoretically, battery life should be the same no matter the clock speeds if the voltage is constant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you look at the overclock app it actually runs on medium volt. ..
SENT FROM THE DOG POUND
In other words if you set it at 1275 volts it's 1275 medium voltage.. Not 1275 standard volts... get it..
SENT FROM THE DOG POUND
xdadevnube said:
*EDIT* Forgot to ask, does anybody know if there is an appreciable difference in battery life when overclocking at stock voltage? Theoretically, battery life should be the same no matter the clock speeds if the voltage is constant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is not true. Transistors have different power dissipation when they are switching versus when they are not. The faster you clock them the higher the power dissipation even when the voltage to them is the same.
I can't believe how long it took for someone point out the DBZ reference on a message board filled with nerds.

Categories

Resources