as of today we all know that there is no perfect phone manufacturer that provide our needs when it comes to AOSP, smoothness, lagfree, and great user experienced i create this thread to have a background in different phone and help some of users to decide which phone is the best and best manufacturer that can provide our needs if you buy your next phone to not waste again your money in a useless and full of promise phone
post your opinion and suggestion of which phone brand is the best to buy without a waste of money
i include non android
i don't know if i miss something but almost all in the choices is available in every country
and
vote for the best SoC you can provide your background when using the SoC you said please vote 1 for best BRAND and 1 for SoC, i only include the most common SoC that racing to be the TOP SoC of all time
you can vote more than one but please one brand and one soc only to be able to create a accurate poll and provide what's the best
Mtk6577 because it's so cheap sub 150€ phones can have dualcore a9 socs
Sent from my GT-S6500 using xda app-developers app
Samsung = average build quality + sh***y accessories
Nokia phones have always been fantastically build (WP or not). So I'd have to go with Nokia.
If we are talking just Android phones, I would go with Samsung or the Google Nexus phones.
Phone Brands...
The only two companies to produce anything amazing that I have tested so far would have to be HTC and Motorola. Granite, Motorola doesn't quite have the whole keyboard phone thing down, their Droid X2 and Razr devices are pretty solid. HTC are generally a number 1 producer. If I had to pick a third place operative, it would have to be Samsung. Once they got off their a**es and actually figured out how to design a phone, their Galaxy line seems pretty solid. Although their durability could be a bit better. :good:
sk8er_boi47 said:
Samsung = average build quality + sh***y accessories
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It´s true:good:
Vector17-Darkroom said:
It´s true:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so after all samsung still need to work more, today its hard to decide what kind of android should i buy i have top 3 brands in my mind, samsung, google and htc
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda premium
I think Samsung launching superb smartphone which are very famous in youngsters. I think Samsung is best mobile brand.
I am new
I agree with second post.
Zedd247 said:
Mtk6577 because it's so cheap sub 150€ phones can have dualcore a9 socs
Sent from my GT-S6500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good: I have an Huawei u8836d (Mtk6577) and is almost perfect: reasonable price, good performance, materials, everything
Related
I have an old Samsung dumbphone and I want to upgrade. My budget is <=$300 and I'd prefer Android over other OSes. I don't live in the US, so, I have no ISP preference and will only buy unlocked phones.
So, what's the best phone for ~$300?
Get Xperia phones like Neo V. You might have to add a few dollars but it's worth it.
yea the neo v looks pretty good, might go for it. Thanks
the HTC Desire S is a good phone with a aluminium body. costs about 270€
support from devs is very good!!
The Desire S is about 280 on handtec, about the same as the Xperia.
The Motorola DEFY Plus is about 190, pretty good price IMO but what about the phone itself? Is it any good?
Visit the Chinese online shops (like Tinydeal for examle). There's a great selection of phones and you may well meet your budget.
Get the SE Xperia Arc S,really good phone it has 512mb ram, 1.4ghz single core processor, [email protected], adreno 205, android 2.3 upgradable to 4.0
Astraport said:
Visit the Chinese online shops (like Tinydeal for examle). There's a great selection of phones and you may well meet your budget.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't want generic chinese phones because I don't think they have good support in terms of software. I'd rather go with a famous brand and get regular software patches and general support.
Phone under $300
Hi,
You can have HTC Wildfire its cost is under $300. Its a very good design phone with all great features. Specifications- 5Mega pixel camera autofocus and LED Flash, Android 2.3 Gingerbread, 3G, WiFi, GPS with A-GPS support and many more great features.
You can try optimus 2x . I think you can find one under 300. Its dual core. If can't chech about captivate...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA
hiii guyz i m going to buy htc one v for my brother as it has ics pre installed...
is it good??
ny one tryed it?
will it be good than galaxy r??
please give your opinion ??
here is specification from gsmareana--http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_one_v-4575.php
edit:
today i gets hands on htc one v...
its good but i cant feel its gaving ics on it...
what about huwai honour ,it too gets ics it it...
and the new released intel processor lava Xolo
X900.??
akshatsourav said:
hiii guyz i m going to buy htc one v for my brother as it has ics pre installed...
is it good??
ny one tryed it?
will it be good than galaxy r??
please give your opinion ??
here is specification from gsmareana--http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_one_v-4575.php
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well according to the specs (pretty disappointing, but expected that from HTC), its just an ICS installed HTC Desire S...
Single core processor, well, is not future proof according to me... But if u want the HTC experience and prefer looks over specs, then it is for you at that price range...
sagarwadhwa1 said:
Well according to the specs (pretty disappointing, but expected that from HTC), its just an ICS installed HTC Desire S...
Single core processor, well, is not future proof according to me... But if u want the HTC experience and prefer looks over specs, then it is for you at that price range...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanx buddy....
but waitin fr some more comments...
akshatsourav said:
thanx buddy....
but waitin fr some more comments...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Watch out the size of the mobile. It is just 2/3rd size of galaxy r. You need the bigger display to enjoy ics, surf, games etc. My friend recently bought in poorvika Chennai. They did not have the dummy piece and asked him to pay before they open the box and show the piece. I don't like the physical buttons and design. Those spaces could have been used for display.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk
It depends on expectations, it's clearly a successor of HTC legend, and it has its advantages and disadvantages. User interface is pretty nice, u cannot even compare ****ty tw style. HTC tries at least make some modification in their ui, not like sammy. I can bet that camera is not worse than ours. Unibody feels more sturdy and solid. And think that not everyone is an android freak that likes huge and fast devices. But even here devs interest will be most possibly much bigger than in case of sgr. If the price is good I think it's worth to consider.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
m.kochan10 said:
It depends on expectations, it's clearly a successor of HTC legend, and it has its advantages and disadvantages. User interface is pretty nice, u cannot even compare ****ty tw style. HTC tries at least make some modification in their ui, not like sammy. I can bet that camera is not worse than ours. Unibody feels more sturdy and solid. And think that not everyone is an android freak that likes huge and fast devices. But even here devs interest will be most possibly much bigger than in case of sgr. If the price is good I think it's worth to consider.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
price difference of sgr and one v
(in indian markets)
sgr ~21000 INR(~405 USD)
one v ~18500 INR (~356 USD)
What about htc one s??? You could consider that if it's available and in your budget
One s is dual core and has decent specs
Sent from my GT-I9103 using XDA
I thought about it too! I just don't trust HTC after my adventure with Incredible S and qualcom snapdragon is not the fastest cpu (1,5 ghz in SGS II Lte is not as fast as 1,2 hgz exynos in sgs II). If not exynos I would prefer Ti OMAP. So I'll wait till somebody test it.
Well, it is obviously not as good as the R going by specs. But mostly everybody has had some issue or the other with the R. HTC devices are the most reliable in my experience.
And the dev support would be awesome.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using XDA App
FeralFire said:
Well, it is obviously not as good as the R going by specs. But mostly everybody has had some issue or the other with the R. HTC devices are the most reliable in my experience.
And the dev support would be awesome.
Sent from my GT-I9103 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i hav used galaxy s, galaxy tab,
and using galaxy r....
i havnt felt ny unreliablness in them...
m.kochan10 said:
I thought about it too! I just don't trust HTC after my adventure with Incredible S and qualcom snapdragon is not the fastest cpu (1,5 ghz in SGS II Lte is not as fast as 1,2 hgz exynos in sgs II). If not exynos I would prefer Ti OMAP. So I'll wait till somebody test it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wat iz the exprence?
yeah im too waiting to first check it out live....
will go tomorrow to local store...
will sure write wat i get on that...
Exactly...I hadn't any sort of problems with my SGR either, on the other hand HTC Incredible S was really unreliable.
vbz89 said:
What about htc one s??? You could consider that if it's available and in your budget
One s is dual core and has decent specs
Sent from my GT-I9103 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
one s have 1.5 ghz dual core processor which is next gen arm v9 (considered as a one of the fastest smart phone), it have awesome specs like samoled display, 8mpix shooter, preloded ics. but its much expensive compared to one v
one v is 18500 INR (~350 USD)
one s is 34000 INR (~650 USD)
I really don't believe that this Qualcomm MSM8260A Snapdragon (1.5 ghz) is gonna be faster than samsung exynos in sgs2.
m.kochan10 said:
I really don't believe that this Qualcomm MSM8260A Snapdragon (1.5 ghz) is gonna be faster than samsung exynos in sgs2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just read review by gsmarena they says that one s is fastest phone of the world (its faster than one x quad core tegra 3), its also hard to believe for me what scores they post there
http://m.gsmarena.com/htc_one_s-review-746p3.php
Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk 2
Wow...that's really hard to believe, but if it's true then I'm really impressed.
Well, I have never used any of the flagship devices by samsung for any extended periods of time.
But my experience with Galaxy R and Galaxy SL have NOT been amazing.
Reflashing firmwares. Wiping cache. Spending hours on google researching the problem you are having.
Never a samsung again for me.
My next device would be either a HTC or a Sony.
Mine experience is far away from being amazing but it's ok, everything has worked as it should. The only thing that bothers me is lack of both samsung's and devs' support for SGR.
I would never buy a "poorer brother" of a flagship model ever again. IT turned out to be an unwanted child. Next one will be a flagship - due to best support from each side, even the older one like SGS2....but most probably will be a Nexus.
m.kochan10 said:
Mine experience is far away from being amazing but it's ok, everything has worked as it should. The only thing that bothers me is lack of both samsung's and devs' support for SGR.
I would never buy a "poorer brother" of a flagship model ever again. IT turned out to be an unwanted child. Next one will be a flagship - due to best support from each side, even the older one like SGS2....but most probably will be a Nexus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U should wait for s iii to come it will be costly than sii and nexus but i think exynos quad core @1.5ghz will deliver much better processimg power than htc one s and one x
http://m.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9300_galaxy_s_iii-4238.php
Sent from my GT-I9103 using Tapatalk 2
I am not that demanding...dual-core is really enough for me I just want a solid device with real devs/producent support.
Hello,
I want to upgrade my phone to high end android (have been using windows mobile 6.5.3 and android 2.3.7 )
so i have looked over some thing like 20 phones and i could not pick one that will i will be able to like my own child .
The problem is mainly since all the phones have the same price, ie,. the htc desire HD have 4,3" display and 1 ghz cpu while the LG optimus 2x have the same 3.4" display but with dual core cpu and over eBay the price is the same for me, so what to choose HTC or a little cheaper LG ?
And that effects all phone so if you pls can you suggest me some phones and a reason why you have suggested them over other phones.
I prefer bid displays over 4.0" and thin around ~10mm
I am asking since i will buy a phone which will stay with me over several years before i will choose to replace it,
(got stack with Moto Defy with 3 year contract - and its bad .. very bad... )
thank you for any help.
HTC for sure. I believe them to be second best to Samsung phones at this point. All you have to do is look at user reviews.
mri.project said:
Hello,
I want to upgrade my phone to high end android (have been using windows mobile 6.5.3 and android 2.3.7 )
so i have looked over some thing like 20 phones and i could not pick one that will i will be able to like my own child .
The problem is mainly since all the phones have the same price, ie,. the htc desire HD have 4,3" display and 1 ghz cpu while the LG optimus 2x have the same 3.4" display but with dual core cpu and over eBay the price is the same for me, so what to choose HTC or a little cheaper LG ?
And that effects all phone so if you pls can you suggest me some phones and a reason why you have suggested them over other phones.
I prefer bid displays over 4.0" and thin around ~10mm
I am asking since i will buy a phone which will stay with me over several years before i will choose to replace it,
(got stack with Moto Defy with 3 year contract - and its bad .. very bad... )
thank you for any help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cuseme said:
HTC for sure. I believe them to be second best to Samsung phones at this point. All you have to do is look at user reviews.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, but does single core 1ghz cpu is real important or i have to buy dual core cpu ?
mri.project said:
Okay, but does single core 1ghz cpu is real important or i have to buy dual core cpu ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would definitely go with a dual core and I would agree that HTC is better than LG. If your going to play any graphic intensive games you definitely need a dual core processor with at least 1G of RAM. A quad core processor is the way to go if your outside the U.S.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Search xda dev thread for each of your choice, and choose one which has most development that will make it life longer.
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app
marifb said:
Search xda dev thread for each of your choice, and choose one which has most development that will make it life longer.
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have tried to search for the best option . like the HTC HD2 which developers just can't get enough of it.
but the phone is old, Galaxy s 1 is way too expansive for a 2 years old phone, and the HTC is a general expensive device.
So i could find only the LG Nitro which is a good phone for its $ .. $470 for a 4.5" HD with dual core cpu and 10mm thick, can't find any thing better..
HTC are mostly fat devices and i can't see any reason why but the thin cost as double as $550 .. and onlt 480-800 res. while the LG is
around 1280x720 res.
see my problem?
Besides it all the phones run Android so there is not problem modding it , and the Nitro have Cyanogen 9.0 support so it should be solid for a while.
mri.project said:
Hello,
I want to upgrade my phone to high end android (have been using windows mobile 6.5.3 and android 2.3.7 )
so i have looked over some thing like 20 phones and i could not pick one that will i will be able to like my own child .
The problem is mainly since all the phones have the same price, ie,. the htc desire HD have 4,3" display and 1 ghz cpu while the LG optimus 2x have the same 3.4" display but with dual core cpu and over eBay the price is the same for me, so what to choose HTC or a little cheaper LG ?
And that effects all phone so if you pls can you suggest me some phones and a reason why you have suggested them over other phones.
I prefer bid displays over 4.0" and thin around ~10mm
I am asking since i will buy a phone which will stay with me over several years before i will choose to replace it,
(got stack with Moto Defy with 3 year contract - and its bad .. very bad... )
thank you for any help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you heard about mi-two? Google for it to find more information. Generally it looks awesome with 4 cores clocked at 1,5GHz, Adreno320 GPU, 4,3" IPS display with ~340dpi (30% more the iPhone4S) and great battery capacity. The only problem is that it might not be easily available outside China. But if I will be able to get one I will do it without thinking much about it.
The Optimus 2x is a 4 inch 800x480 screen, not 4.3
Anyway, due to ****ty support from LG, prices for it have absolutely tanked.. It's now available from $200-300 outright.
The good news? ICS is coming out very soon for it (rumored). Apparently it's in the testing stage.
So might be a very cheap way for you to get a fairly high end dual core for stuff all money.
dyleck said:
Have you heard about mi-two? Google for it to find more information. Generally it looks awesome with 4 cores clocked at 1,5GHz, Adreno320 GPU, 4,3" IPS display with ~340dpi (30% more the iPhone4S) and great battery capacity. The only problem is that it might not be easily available outside China. But if I will be able to get one I will do it without thinking much about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xiaomi mi-two $550 preorder now on eBay. it will be cheaper for me to GS III OR HTC ONE X i just don't like these devices - gs iii due to plastic and htc one x due to 16 giga with out micro sd card memory while i use around 40 giga on a phone.
any way i just thought you could suggest me a device and a reason why it is better then LG and so far i see that they are non, i never saw a company which give any support for a phone... so i am not looking for support .
Any way thank you all i have decided to buy the LG device the Nitro - looks great and cheaper then most devices. btw LG is also manufacturing Apple and Samsung mobile parts so i can't see why it should be worth quality.
Buy HTC One X. It is a really cool phone !!!
Closed
What is best for me may not be for you, so there is no such as "best"
Wife wants one but as she has not much experience with smartphones (except symbian) a low end device would be a good starting point.
Decent camera, 5mpix+ and power to run Web browser so it's not frustrating.
Ofc the bigger the screen the better.
Main use case would still be talking so if there are problems with built in speaker or modem sw that would be deal killer.
Any suggestions?
Price max 120€, that's ~150$ and needs to be available/shipped to Europe.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
I would get a decent one and just strip the programs she wont use. I personally regretted getting abasic one to start with a week later when I wanted more out of it and had to go buy another. Same with my wifes phone.. hers lasted about a month. Same with BOTH of our tablets. May as well start out with what you are going to want if you ask me.
krank77 said:
Wife wants one but as she has not much experience with smartphones (except symbian) a low end device would be a good starting point.
Decent camera, 5mpix+ and power to run Web browser so it's not frustrating.
Ofc the bigger the screen the better.
Main use case would still be talking so if there are problems with built in speaker or modem sw that would be deal killer.
Any suggestions?
Price max 120€, that's ~150$ and needs to be available/shipped to Europe.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd get a mid-range phone. Maybe one that is over a year old but still powerful, like the Galaxy S2. Probably better off getting a phone that used to be top of the line and has been discounted heavily due to depreciation as opposed to a phone that is entry level. I would really stray from weak Android phones.
Thanks guys for the replies. Will rethink my strategy here
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Ik it may seem older but I have a Samsung vibrant and this things still kicking its getting jellybean on xda.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda app-developers app
What about Huawei phones? When I was at MWC this year, they offered phones on ICS 4.0 with quad core stones that were quite nice and much cheaper than their HTC or Samsung brothers.
dvandam said:
I'd get a mid-range phone. Maybe one that is over a year old but still powerful, like the Galaxy S2. Probably better off getting a phone that used to be top of the line and has been discounted heavily due to depreciation as opposed to a phone that is entry level. I would really stray from weak Android phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^This.
I wouldn't recommend a low-end Android phone to anyone, as it simply defies the whole concept of smartphone. It is not exactly "smart" when you have to wait whole eternity for a simple operation as starting a web browser, and doing a search. My Wildfire got so slow, that even typing an SMS was frustrating because of slowdowns. When using a offline navigation (IGo), I had to wait several minutes for program to load, and for GPS initialization. Even after it loads, it is frustrating to use it, because of weak CPU.
I guess, any phone with 1Ghz processor will be a good start...
All guys here are right........low end Android phones are very slow.
Really consider to buy a phone with least 1000 mhz.......they quite fast and great
I have a HD2 with 1000mhz and he is still kickin on 4.0 ICS
Sent from my HTC HD2 using Tapatalk 2
Huawei Ascend G300
hiSSteria said:
^This.
I wouldn't recommend a low-end Android phone to anyone, as it simply defies the whole concept of smartphone. It is not exactly "smart" when you have to wait whole eternity for a simple operation as starting a web browser, and doing a search. My Wildfire got so slow, that even typing an SMS was frustrating because of slowdowns. When using a offline navigation (IGo), I had to wait several minutes for program to load, and for GPS initialization. Even after it loads, it is frustrating to use it, because of weak CPU.
I guess, any phone with 1Ghz processor will be a good start...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Part of it is I speak from experience. I got my wife a Samsung Intercept for Virgin Mobile about a year ago and it was abhorrent. It was a low-end phone when we got it and it didn't take long for it to just become nearly unusable. Even with a FroYo upgrade it still sucked. Between the horrible phone speed and horrible internet speed that Virgin provided, we did a complete 180 and I got her an unlocked Galaxy Nexus and now we do T-Mobile PAYG 4G plan. Now she's really uses her phone for web stuff, apps, messaging, and taking photos, as opposed to before with the Intercept where she could just message and talk for the most part.
Huawei Ascend G300
I would go with xperia mini or mini pro, they are perfect phones with very good camera. I think woman can apreciate the outlook too.
How about the good ol' Galaxy S?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
how about considering lenovo phones?
samsung galaxy S 1 would be a good one. I'm assuming she just wants a phone that works all by itself and stuff right? No custom roms or other "technical" stuff?
the s2 is a good choice but will easily break your budget. is this price with a contract or without? there's a bunch of phones available, as long as you stay above 1ghz as previously mentioned, and she'll be fine
Sent from my GT-I9300
AIPHEE said:
I would go with xperia mini or mini pro, they are perfect phones with very good camera. I think woman can apreciate the outlook too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xperia is definitely an option. Where I live Huawei and Lenovo are not found in b&m shops but Xperia sure has it perks with the design. Thanks for all the comments so far. I am now convinced to stay away from the absolutely lowest end of the line.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
how about xiaomi m1s? great phone with cheap price lol...
:cyclops::cyclops::cyclops:
i would start out with a galaxy s2
Asianwhocantgetthingsdone said:
i would start out with a galaxy s2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
s2 is NOT a low end phone..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Hello everyone, I would like to ask you a couple of questions. HTC ONE S is a beautiful phone,fast, the best to the touch and with a processor speed but ... But in the period where they are baked increasingly cheap quad core and even dual core as the new pro s4 are faster. In addition there is the problem that is not particularly supported by Community, stay with One S?
Express your thoughts thanks
If you want a dull vanilla android then yes ! But I would stay with one s or maybe shift to one x , one x+ or Samsung galaxy s3 ,try using a aokp/aosp Rom that's how a nexus device is,, very plain !! , if you got money to spent go buy some other quad cores like one x and sgs3 , people go with HTC and Samsung coz of their innovative ui ( sense for HTC and touchwiz for Samsung) . Android has only be rocking because of Samsung HTC and Sony , nexus devices are cheaper but not that enjoyable ,
Sent from my HTC VLE_U using xda app-developers app
aditya. said:
If you want a dull vanilla android then yes ! But I would stay with one s or maybe shift to one x , one x+ or Samsung galaxy s3 ,try using a aokp/aosp Rom that's how a nexus device is,, very plain !! , if you got money to spent go buy some other quad cores like one x and sgs3 , people go with HTC and Samsung coz of their innovative ui ( sense for HTC and touchwiz for Samsung) . Android has only be rocking because of Samsung HTC and Sony , nexus devices are cheaper but not that enjoyable ,
Sent from my HTC VLE_U using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would say opposite of what this guy says. Samsung and HTC throw crappy interfaces over stock android making it slower and only causing you to not get the updated operating system timely on your phone. Vanilla android is best and I'm planning to buy nexus 4 as soon as it's out. One decent reason to stick with one s is that you don't have money to throw around buying the latest and greatest phone.
Sent from my HTC One S using xda app-developers app
Tyler DeLarge said:
Express your thoughts thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the phone unable to do something that you need it to do? Are a few more megaflipflops of processing power really going to make your life better?
If the answer to either of these questions is yes then buy another phone.
Trendy
Trend!!!
People wants to be trendy. Mostly iPhone users. Do not be like them.
As @Troute said: Is the phone unable to do something that you need it to do?
I find support pretty decent depending on what you're looking for. There's a good variety of different ROMs available to suit your tastes. Even though there's faster phones available now, it really depends on what you need to make your phone work for you. If you don't notice any issues with lag, performance is good, and battery life is good then I think things should be ok?
Tyler DeLarge said:
Hello everyone, I would like to ask you a couple of questions. HTC ONE S is a beautiful phone,fast, the best to the touch and with a processor speed but ... But in the period where they are baked increasingly cheap quad core and even dual core as the new pro s4 are faster. In addition there is the problem that is not particularly supported by Community, stay with One S?
Express your thoughts thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I spent $285 on this phone I think I got a solid deal. Definitely don't get an iphone anywhere near retail value. If I had to get a phone right now I would buy the Nexus 4.
Well as it stands right now the nexus 4 is gonna be strictly worst than our phone cuz LG made it. Anyone one else confused on that?
I say go for a onex+ or a s3. imma skip out on this round of smartphones though cuz our one s is one of the top phones out. Everytime i pull it out ppl are like OMG what phone is that. pretty much once the wow factor is gone its time for an upgrade lol
I mainly need a really powerful camera to replace compact digital camera for daily use, I don't want to take two devices go out. So, I will stay with One S and not to go with N4 like everyone else here.
I will probably buy a new phone later when HTC or Sony introduces their new camera sensor. HTC is going to roll out 5" 1080 J Butterfly with 8M cam in Dec on Japan, wanna see if the sensor get improved and I might get one.
blackhartct said:
Well as it stands right now the nexus 4 is gonna be strictly worst than our phone cuz LG made it. Anyone one else confused on that?
I say go for a onex+ or a s3. imma skip out on this round of smartphones though cuz our one s is one of the top phones out. Everytime i pull it out ppl are like OMG what phone is that. pretty much once the wow factor is gone its time for an upgrade lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LG is guilty of terrible software, but with the Nexus 4 that's not an issue. The hardware of the Nexus 4 is patchwork. On one hand you have the quad core S4 pro, on the other you're stuck with only 12gb of accessible space. On one hand you have an amazing screen, on the other the battery life sucks and can't be upgraded. You have to decide what you can tolerate to decide if a Nexus is for you. I love AOSP, but HATE limited storage. I love the resolution, but HATE the battery life. So I won't be getting a Nexus 4.
Sent from my H1S using XDA Premium.
I may get the nexus 4 it will have a lot of devs working on it and I could just flash a sense rom onto the phone because I like sense. And I really want nfc
It's only 280 pound for 16gb and it beats the GS3 in specs
--------------
If you are new to xda please watch this video it'll help you out )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmvCpR45LKA&feature=youtube_gdata_player
I don't like the thing that they're delaying new updates too much and plus it's not that well made except the ceramic body ofc