Related
I have used my not so powerful but beloved x8 for some time now,, its time to get a high end smartphone , but i am pretty confused on which one to buy?
I am currently considering Samsung galaxy s2, Samsung galaxy Nexus, Htc Sensation XE, Xperia Arc s(if only it had dual core!), Motorola Droid Razr ,, So which one do you guys prefer and why? and are there any other phone that i should consider?
Don't go for the razr.
I would not go for the Razr since the battery is pretty poor and not replaceable, although the Rarz maxx gives you plenty of juice.
I would prefer the GNex since it is the most advanced phone out there. Also it gives you a long period of rom-updates since its an development phone.
My second choice will be the SGS2, here in the Nederlands is has gone true an small price-drop since the GNex is in stores. so this option is more attractive now.
D2Dchris said:
I would not go for the Razr since the battery is pretty poor and not replaceable, although the Rarz maxx gives you plenty of juice.
I would prefer the GNex since it is the most advanced phone out there. Also it gives you a long period of rom-updates since its an development phone.
My second choice will be the SGS2, here in the Nederlands is has gone true an small price-drop since the GNex is in stores. so this option is more attractive now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wht i dont understand is that why would you say the razr's battery life is not good, according to almost all the test it came over galaxy nexus, actually galaxy nexus has the least battery life amongst all the phones i mentioned because of its high res screen. but the galaxy nexus's battery can be replaced so i guess that seems to be the best phone soo far
I would take the galaxy nexus too because you get all updates at first
Or you wait for the sony xperia s it will have a 1.5 ghz dual core processor it will come in march
phone
mytouch 4g
I would choose GS2 over Nexus. I am myself a GS2 user and played with galaxy nexus for some time. The very big difference between these two at first is the weight and user interface. Although it's possible to port ICS to galaxy S2 and yet it's very unstable compared to nexus. But on longer term, why GS2 over Nexus? I am an accessories lover and I like to have a cool unique looking phone. In my experience there still aren't a lot of cool accessories available for Nexus S. It's a new phone and the question is will there good looking accessories in the future. In my opinion, no there won't be. Like the previous model Nexus, the hype stays with the latest software, but no hype in expanding the use of it's phone in way of dressing the phone.
Little summary: GS2--> a lot of cases and accessories available. Gnex---> ICS
But hey, who knows maybe samsung comes with GS3 soon!!(expected in May)
An htc amaze is a nice phone
Sent from my Dell Streak 7 using XDA App
Hooride707 said:
An htc amaze is a nice phone
Sent from my Dell Streak 7 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The amaze is downright heavy bro
As a happy G2 owner i would say go for it. But the Nexus is pretty nice too. I was in love with the Razr until I saw it in store.
I would go with the SGS2 great phone with a huge dev community so lots of roms and lots of support. It's gonna be my next phone, unless htc really does come out with this quad core phone they keep leaking info on.
Try the Samsung Galaxy Note. Its the best of both worlds which is a smartphone and a tablet combine into 2. The 5.3 inch screen makes reading easier. Dual core at 1.4 GHz and can be easily rooted.
Buy SGS2. Great phone, having G9000 before, it was very goo, but has some performance issues. G9100 has solved it,working like charm, have Android 4.0.3 installed.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Galaxy s2 it is than,,
pteols said:
Try the Samsung Galaxy Note. Its the best of both worlds which is a smartphone and a tablet combine into 2. The 5.3 inch screen makes reading easier. Dual core at 1.4 GHz and can be easily rooted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The note is out of the question,, nothing more than a bigger s2,, i dont see my self comfortably carrying that huge phone around if you know what i mean,,
AbirXtreme said:
wht i dont understand is that why would you say the razr's battery life is not good, according to almost all the test it came over galaxy nexus, actually galaxy nexus has the least battery life amongst all the phones i mentioned because of its high res screen. but the galaxy nexus's battery can be replaced so i guess that seems to be the best phone soo far
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The RAZR has a 680 mAh battery where the Nexus has a 1850 mah.
Better battery.
It really all depends on how you use it though.
Nexus!
Samsung Nexus has been one of the sexiest phones that I have ever owned. Straight Google support... can't beat that!
ValentineDROID said:
The RAZR has a 680 mAh battery where the Nexus has a 1850 mah.
Better battery.
It really all depends on how you use it though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats some major wrong information you got there bro ,, the razr has a Li-Ion 1780 mAh battery and the galaxy s2 has a Li-Ion 1650 mAh battery,, and the nexus has Li-Ion 1750 mAh battery,, according to some global battery tests Galaxy s2 has the best battery life even with 1650 due to its lower pixel density compared to the razr and nexus,, the motorola droid razr comes in second and the nexus has the worst battery life of the lot,,(due to its massive screen and high pixel density), get you facts right bro, before you give information like that, and with 680 mah a dual core smart phone would not last half a day !!
I have a SGSII and I can recommend it. In the end for me it's about the hardware and the screen.
On the downside the battery is not great but it seems that all smartphones suffer from this.
skaapman101 said:
I have a SGSII and I can recommend it. In the end for me it's about the hardware and the screen.
On the downside the battery is not great but it seems that all smartphones suffer from this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The raze has almost the same specs and a higher pixel density super amoled screen, so would that be a better choice than the gs2?
I recommend the Galaxy Nexus. I mean what could be better than enjoying the pure Google experience? The GNexus has an awesome display and has the newest rom available from Android. You will be getting updates on this phone for a long time, and it will be up to par with other phones even when out of the 2 year contract. The Galaxy Nexus is the way to go.
The flagship of Samsung is now up and whoa! That is some latest piece of tech.
Specifications:
Samsung Galaxy SIII:
4.8" 720p SUPER AMOLED (pentile) Display.
1.4 GHz Quad Core.
8MP rear / 1.9MP front camera.
2100 mAh battery
16/32GB storage (64 coming soon) with sd card slot.
ICS with Touchwiz 4.0
HTC ONE X:
4.7" 720p Super LCD2 Display.
1.5 GHz Quad core.
8MP rear / 1.3MP front camera.
1800mAh battery.
32GB internal storage with no SD Card slot.
ICS with HTC Sense 4.0
My Opinion:
Well, specs ain't the only thing. The overall performance, feel in hand and overall experience of the phone really counts. I don't think it's a big leap forward as we already know HTC ONE X is a beast in itself.
I prefer HOX because I don't like touchwiz UI of Samsung and the build quality is better in HTC ofcourse.
Many people will go against me and that's how it goes in the world.
* Sense 4.0 is better than touchwiz.
* ImageSense is better than SIII camera.
* 1.5 GHz quad core (penta core to be precise) is better than 1.4 GHz Quad Core.
* The shape is actually better than SIII. Didn't like the shape of SIII. The shape is a serious letdown for me.
*I'll vote for One X against SIII*
IMPORTANT NOTE:
Buy the one you like. Vote for the one you admire. This sort of competition is good for the new technology. And at the end of the day THE BEST phone is one which is in your hands.
Enjoy your phone. Enjoy the talks.
Like THIS for a compliment.
Would love to listen from you people.
Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. Have you owned both devices personally yet? Until you've had both side by side doing the same exact things then there is no way to properly determined.which is superior. Benchmarks are worthless. Seems you're already on Team HTC's bandwagon so you're mind is made up. There will be a billion GS3 posts on XDA and they will all won't be worth a ****.
rdubyah said:
Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. Have you owned both devices personally yet? Until.you've had both side by side doing the same exact things then there is no way to properly determined.which is superior. Benchmarks are worthless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah benchmarks are useless. That's why I didn't bring them into discussion.
I'm comparing the SPECS ONLY and there you see One X smashes SGSIII.
SGIII is built of polycarbonate as well but coated a sort of plastic layer (don't remember the name exactly) and that's ridiculous.
The bright shiny 720p SUPER LCD2 outclasses Pentile 720p Super Amoled.
Sent from my HTC Desire
mohsinraza said:
Yeah benchmarks are useless. That's why I didn't bring them into discussion.
I'm comparing the SPECS ONLY and there you see One X smashes SGSIII.
Sent from my HTC Desire
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lmao biased much? only thing that is better is the screen.
Polycarbonate comes at the expense of microSD and (smaller) built in battery. Along with better battery you can pull out GS3 has a 32nm SOC instead of 40something which also saves battery and heats less.
Maybe the 7th One X you'll return will be on par with GS3.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
BTW Touchwiz vs Sense is kinda pointless as it depends on user preference, and anyhow were on XDA and you know how easy it is to just flash something different.
HTC..is interesting..very interesting
mohsinraza said:
The flagship of Samsung is now up and whoa! That is some latest piece of tech.
Specifications:
Samsung Galaxy SIII:
4.8" 720p SUPER AMOLED (pentile) Display.
1.4 GHz Quad Core.
8MP rear / 1.9MP front camera.
2100 mAh battery
16/32GB storage (64 coming soon) with sd card slot.
ICS with Touchwiz 4.0
HTC ONE X:
4.7" 720p Super LCD2 Display.
1.5 GHz Quad core.
8MP rear / 1.3MP front camera.
1800mAh battery.
32GB internal storage with no SD Card slot.
ICS with HTC Sense 4.0
My Opinion:
Well, specs ain't the only thing. The overall performance, feel in hand and overall experience of the phone really counts. I don't think it's a big leap forward as we already know HTC ONE X is a beast in itself.
I prefer HOX because I don't like touchwiz UI of Samsung and the build quality is better in HTC ofcourse.
Many people will go against me and that's how it goes in the world.
* Sense 4.0 is better than touchwiz.
* ImageSense is better than SIII camera.
* 1.5 GHz quad core (penta core to be precise) is better than 1.4 GHz Quad Core.
* The shape is actually better than SIII. Didn't like the shape of SIII. The shape is a serious letdown for me.
*I'll vote for One X against SIII*
IMPORTANT NOTE:
Buy the one you like. Vote for the one you admire. This sort of competition is good for the new technology. And at the end of the day THE BEST phone is one which is in your hands.
Enjoy your phone. Enjoy the talks.
Like THIS for a compliment.
Would love to listen from you people.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Omg. Galaxy S3 GPU and CPU is much much better and best CPU and GPU on a mobile. New GPU is 400mhz. Just WTF. Even screen is best screen until today. I don't care about fancy stuff but new touchwiz is better than sense for me. REMEMBER THIS. Galaxy S with froyo have HW accelerated browser because of touchwiz. No one can touch S3 now. Tell me about glup. Byes.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
mohsinraza said:
Yeah benchmarks are useless. That's why I didn't bring them into discussion.
I'm comparing the SPECS ONLY and there you see One X smashes SGSIII.
SGIII is built of polycarbonate as well but coated a sort of plastic layer (don't remember the name exactly) and that's ridiculous.
The bright shiny 720p SUPER LCD2 outclasses Pentile 720p Super Amoled.
Sent from my HTC Desire
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really interesting guys! There are 2 chances.
1- You didn't see a amoled screen.
2- You don't know about specs. Because One X doesn't have chance to own SGS3. Like S2 and Sensation. Even my sgs1 is faster and more ram than sensation.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
burakgon said:
Omg. Galaxy S3 GPU and CPU is much much better and best CPU and GPU on a mobile. New GPU is 400mhz. Just WTF. Even screen is best screen until today. I don't care about fancy stuff but new touchwiz is better than sense for me. REMEMBER THIS. Galaxy S with froyo have HW accelerated browser because of touchwiz. No one can touch S3 now. Tell me about glup. Byes.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CPU & GPU won't make a difference until you play games HD games on the phone all day long. And for daily workings both are more than enough.
Whoa! You're kiddin' me. The pentile display is way too awkward. THIS IS NOT THE BEST SCREEN.
UI may come down to personal preference so not in discussion.
nebsif said:
lmao biased much? only thing that is better is the screen.
Polycarbonate comes at the expense of microSD and (smaller) built in battery. Along with better battery you can pull out GS3 has a 32nm SOC instead of 40something which also saves battery and heats less.
Maybe the 7th One X you'll return will be on par with GS3.
BTW Touchwiz vs Sense is kinda pointless as it depends on user preference, and anyhow were on XDA and you know how easy it is to just flash something different.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
32nm and 40nm actually have NO serious difference. Even S4 Snapdragon being 28mm isn't a outdated product. This actually is a no difference. Fifth core on One X is assigned to do the job as you've mentioned, less heat & longer battery.
Sent from my HTC Desire
Both of them are great but I prefer Huawei ascend quad XL it has better specs
mohsinraza said:
32nm and 40nm actually have NO serious difference. Even S4 Snapdragon being 28mm isn't a outdated product. This actually is a no difference. Fifth core on One X is assigned to do the job as you've mentioned, less heat & longer battery.
Sent from my HTC Desire
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, but you're very very very wrong here. The difference between 40 and 32 is 20% less battery power for any given task. Between 40 and 28 is closer to 40% less battery usage.
Fifth core on Tegra 3 is technically retarded. Read Nvidia's white paper. The CPU can't have the fifth core on at the same time as any of the others, so Tegra 3 only saves battery power if you're not actually using your phone and it's only doing background tasks while the screen is off.
Furthermore, Tegra 3 has no dynamic voltage control. So if you were to watch a movie on a T3 device, and your email refreshes in the background, it would use the same processor power and clock speed as watching 2 movies at the same time. Both Krait S4 and Exynos 4 have dynamic voltage control.
Personally, I'd rather not have either device and wait for the LTE Padfone.
I had a SGS2... Moved from that to HTC One X because i just couldn't stand their TouchWiz UI..
The development on the SGS2 haven't been as i hoped, mainly due to their drivers.
Sorry, but i will stick with my HTC One X
sreza said:
Personally, I'd rather not have either device and wait for the LTE Padfone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is the price of the Padphone at the release? I know you can preorder it around 1000 dollars
thatdefault said:
What is the price of the Padphone at the release? I know you can preorder it around 1000 dollars
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you do a comparison vs what you would pay otherwise, it's actually much cheaper to get a Padfone than the alternatives.
Padfone+Padfone Station+Station Dock+BT stylus= ~$1000
Est. cost for data on ATT: $20-50 depending on plan size, $30 unlimited if you're grandfathered in like me
Apple:
iPhone 4S= $600
iPad 3rd gen= $600
BT keyboard case= $50
Total: $1250
Est. cost for data on ATT: $65 per month
Android:
HTC One X= $650
Transformer Prime+KB Dock= $700
Total: $1350
Est. cost for data on ATT: $65 per month
So you actually save at least $250 initially, and another $360-$1080 from data costs (Calculated using ATT required 5gb plan for data tethering= $65 per month, cheapest alternate for separate data plans is $55 per month).
If you're a particularly frugal data user, the Padfone system will actually pay for itself and leave you $80 further in the black than you were before your purchase compared to the alternatives!
All of these international One X fans need to remember that the dual core AT&T One X beats out the quad core international tegra 3 version in terms of performance. The quad core exynos is going to SMASH the One X! That being said, I still like the One X better. The SGSIII is like the GNEX's ugly little sister.
The problem is phones are very expensive here and the price won't go down anytime soon the price of galaxy S II is higher than neighboring countries and the price went up when the G model was announced Asus products are very expensive here TF 101 + keyboard dock costs more than the prime + dock. Thank God Dubai isn't far
lowandbehold said:
All of these international One X fans need to remember that the dual core AT&T One X beats out the quad core international tegra 3 version in terms of performance. The quad core exynos is going to SMASH the One X! That being said, I still like the One X better. The SGSIII is like the GNEX's ugly little sister.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would the Exynos chip in the SG3 be faster than the Tegra 3 in the One X?
They're both A9 chips, Exynos is clocked at 1.4 while Tegra 3 is clocked at 1.5. Sure, the Exynos chip has wonderful features like the 32nm build and dynamic voltage control, but those only affect how efficiently it uses the battery. What affects speed is your Cortex class (both A9) and your clock speed, in which case Tegra 3 should theoretically perform slightly better.
I'm pretty sure any speed differences are going to come down to the differences between TouchWiz and Sense, not the specs on the phone.
And therefore, ATT One XL with the extended battery and the Krait S4 chip will probably perform better than the SG3 by the same degree that testing shows that it already performs better than the Tegra 3 One X.
Both of these phones have pretty awesome specs, so in that respect, I think personal preference is going to overrule anything else.
BUT, I have the Amaze 4G, and HTC has made it impossible (so far) to make a ROM that isn't based on their own Sense based ROM. As far as what I can see, HTC's One line is going to be even harder to develop. I enjoy trying different ROMs way too much to stick with HTC from this point forward (unless HTC changes their evil ways ).
As far as the different launchers, I haven't ever really liked a stock launcher on Samsung, HTC, or even LG (I think Cyanogenmod finally got it right with Trebuchet in their CM9 builds). I almost always put in a custom launcher.
i like samsung galaxy s3
ram management in htc one x is si bad
Let's take a look at the facts:
Screen :We will see who has the better screen when the reviews are released.
Proccesor :As shown on the becnhmarks the SGS3 is the faster one.
GPU :Again the SGS3 as shown by the recent benchmarks
Battery :SGS3 has an exchangable batter the HTC One X does not.SGS3 has also the bigger battery.
MicroSD :SGS3
Front camera :SGS3 again 1.3 vs 2.0 MPX
Back camera :Still unknown who has the better camera,but that will be revelead soon.
Storage:SGS3 again 64 GB + micro SD ,HTC ONE X 32 GB no microsd
Design :That's a matter of taste.
The SGS3 is obviously the better phone hardware wise plus it has many more features like eye tracking and S voice that the HTC ONE X lacks.
- UI I could care less what each has. I'm an XDA member and never have stock... lol.
- Processors sound like they'll be identical on the US phones, so that's a non-issue for me as well.
- HTC's lack of SD is a bit worrisome for me since the US only has 16 GB. That may limit what I can store, especially as apps get bigger and bigger. So there's one mark against the One X for me.
- Screens, the Galaxy is a tiny bit bigger, but I need to see peoples reviews that have been able to spend time with both to judge. What's on paper doesn't always matter.
- Camera is kind of important to me. I'm sick of my Captivates crappy camera. Reviews of the One X make it sound like it's awesome. I haven't seen much mention of the S3's yet besides "it looks good". Will have to see how reviewers rate it. It also sounded like the models they were showcasing weren't the final product for the camera either or am I just imagining things?
- GPS is important to me too. Again.. Captivate.... OMG!! I've heard nothing bad yet about the One X, and heard nothing about the S3, so we'll see.
- Aesthetics, build quality, etc... meh, whatever. It's a phone. It sits in my pocket. It goes in my hand and I look at the screen. I don't really care all that much what other people think of my phone while I'm mesmerized by the screen. If panels are falling off, buttons breaking etc. yeah that's bad but I'm pretty confident that won't happen on either phone.
So given that the One X already has a mark against it due to the lack of SD card slot and tiny 16 GB storage (I'm on a 2 GB plan, not unlimited so cloud and stuff isn't a very viable option for me) the S3 would have to have a crappy camera and or faulty GPS for me to consider the One X over it I think.
Hello guys,
Well i need some advice from real people. There are two models in my country: international One X and One XL. You know what the differences are. So maybe someone tested both with same kernel and os version. Which processor is better? Tegra 3 or Snapdragon clocked Krait S4?
In your opinion which one to buy and why? Or just go for One S?
P.S. There are like 1 million reviews and benchmarks and like every single one is different.
Thank you for your opinion!
redh4t said:
Hello guys,
Well i need some advice from real people. There are two models in my country: international One X and One XL. You know what the differences are. So maybe someone tested both with same kernel and os version. Which processor is better? Tegra 3 or Snapdragon clocked Krait S4?
In your opinion which one to buy and why? Or just go for One S?
P.S. There are like 1 million reviews and benchmarks and like every single one is different.
Thank you for your opinion!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
S4 for the battery.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
S4 because its the future.
S4 for the LTE.
S4 for the battery life.
S4 for the win
Sent from my One X
I really do not need LTE. The main thing is speed! And about battery? It is really big difference? Or just go for Galaxy S3...? I just love HTC design, and galaxy is just near ugly, but speed is more important, just hate lag so much.
28nm ftw
Sent from my JellyBean
S4 processor is better. The tegra 3 was rushed so they could be the first to get a quad core. It's crappy architecture. The s4 is better for everything but gaming but only by a little and it kills battery on the tegra
Sent from my One X using xda premium
Speed difference is negligible. S4 wins in a lot of benchmarks, and Tegra wins in a couple. And you would likely not see much difference in real world use. Same performance, but better battery life on the S4.
Also, at launch the Tegra version had graphical glitches, and a number of other bugs that were attributed to the Tegra chipset. Not sure if these were ever sorted out, as I don't keep up with that version. But many were doubting it would be fixed anytime soon, as NVIDIA is notorious for taking forever to address such issues.
And you might think you don't need LTE. But its not just about speed. I get fantastic data reception at my house now under LTE, where under HSPA+ it was dismal (1 bar, with frequent connection drops). At some point, you may find your self in a location(s) that has poor HSPA reception, and LTE will save the day.
Every Tegra device I've put my hands on has always seemed far too slow and glitchy for the supposedly excellent hardware and software behind it. Except the Zune HD, but everyone ignored the Tegra 1 for some reason. S4's got better battery, chances are they are basically identical in real world use. The only downside to the S4 is the lack of official support for the Tegra games, but I'm sure we'll be able to play them in time.
To be honest, we might be able to do them now if Chainfire3d works for us.
I'd buy a Qualcomm based device over a Tegra based one any day of the week for all of the reasons already mentioned.
The S4 may be "only" dual core, but it's the better chip.
sweet, another thread for this
you should of done something original, like ask one x vs. galaxy s3
gunnyman said:
I'd buy a Qualcomm based device over a Tegra based one any day of the week for all of the reasons already mentioned.
The S4 may be "only" dual core, but it's the better chip.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there are s4 with quad core. a chinese phone maker jiayu, is making the jiayu s1 with s4 pro. that is 4 cores with gpu andreno 320! and with 2 gb ram with 32 gb memory with sd card slot and 2500 mah battery or 3000 mah battery!, with a 3.0 megapixel cam in front and 13 megapixel in the bag, and is thin!. only for 260 or more dollars!. incredible no? (gorila glass maybe, like the other older models!) and the value is near the nexus 4, but this one is better, with more battery, (the jiayu g4 with an older procesor with quadcore wins the nexus 4, this will win the samsum galaxy note 2 or more) jiayu is good with good performance battery and resistant products. and very beautiful too
http://www.gizchina.com/2013/01/30/jiayu-s1-prototype-spotted-alongside-g3/
and the definition isnt hd is full hd 440+ ppi !
I have a HTC One S atm and honestly I cannot stand the pentile screen one bit. the blacks/greys are really the only good looking colors. I like everything else about it though, besides the front facing cam quality which I never really use anyways. I have had my eyes on the one x for a long while but never could get my hands on one and im thinking about selling my one s to get it.
Anyways, with the one x+ coming out should I still buy this? the only upgrade I see is ROM memory, and the front facing cam. oh and the tegra 3 which has similar performance as the s4. or is there more?
I also have my eyes on the htc x8, but no clue when that is coming out.
thanks!
edit: it would be nice to hear other peoples opinions on the phone, both cons and pros
stratax said:
I have a HTC One S atm and honestly I cannot stand the pentile screen one bit. the blacks/greys are really the only good looking colors. I like everything else about it though, besides the front facing cam quality which I never really use anyways. I have had my eyes on the one x for a long while but never could get my hands on one and im thinking about selling my one s to get it.
Anyways, with the one x+ coming out should I still buy this? the only upgrade I see is ROM memory, and the front facing cam. oh and the tegra 3 which has similar performance as the s4. or is there more?
I also have my eyes on the htc x8, but no clue when that is coming out.
thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The S4 has better performance than the Tegra 3.
The main difference in One X and One X+ is that the One X+ has removable SD card and a quad core. I think there is a little bit more RAM, and a better camera/screen.
The One X is a great phone, but I don't think there's an official release date yet, so you can wait if you want. Either phone will still be amazing.
absolutelygrim said:
The S4 has better performance than the Tegra 3.
The main difference in One X and One X+ is that the One X+ has removable SD card and a quad core. I think there is a little bit more RAM, and a better camera/screen.
The One X is a great phone, but I don't think there's an official release date yet, so you can wait if you want. Either phone will still be amazing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you show the source you saw that it has a better screen and a removable sdcard slot? says neither on the official site. says that it comes in other quantities like 32gb, 64gb. and better battery performance. Yeah im not sure if I am going to wait cause it will be 400+ when it comes out anyways and I wouldn't like to pay that when the one x is now around $300.
stratax said:
Can you show the source you saw that it has a better screen and a removable sdcard slot? says neither on the official site. says that it comes in other quantities like 32gb, 64gb. and better battery performance. Yeah im not sure if I am going to wait cause it will be 400+ when it comes out anyways and I wouldn't like to pay that when the one x is now around $300.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, sorry, I think I got the One X+ confused with the HTC J Butterfly, which has the removable storage.
The X+ has more internal storage, and I think 2GB of RAM instead of 1, as well as a quad core
http://www.theverge.com/2012/10/17/...nning-5-inch-1080p-j-butterfly-phone-in-japan
that's what I was thinking of
http://reviews.cnet.com/smartphones/htc-one-x-at/4505-6452_7-35477659.html
The one X+ has a tegra 3 quad core, benchmarks show that the S4 in the North American One X performed better than the Tegra 3 international one x, take it as you will. But I cant say if the processor is better without seeing a comparison
absolutelygrim said:
Oh, sorry, I think I got the One X+ confused with the HTC J Butterfly, which has the removable storage.
The X+ has more internal storage, and I think 2GB of RAM instead of 1, as well as a quad core
http://www.theverge.com/2012/10/17/...nning-5-inch-1080p-j-butterfly-phone-in-japan
that's what I was thinking of
http://reviews.cnet.com/smartphones/htc-one-x-at/4505-6452_7-35477659.html
The one X+ has a tegra 3 quad core, benchmarks show that the S4 in the North American One X performed better than the Tegra 3 international one x, take it as you will. But I cant say if the processor is better without seeing a comparison
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.htc.com/www/smartphones/htc-one-x-plus/#specs still 1gb RAM
definitely not worth $100 upgrade. and the j butterfly is a bit too big for my taste even with the expandable storage and SLCD 3. now the x8 looks amazing, pretty much a smaller one x with wp8. im not going to get the first wp8 handset that comes out though, like I did with wp7 and got super bored of the OS.
I think my mind is pretty much set.
How do you like your one x?
stratax said:
http://www.htc.com/www/smartphones/htc-one-x-plus/#specs still 1gb RAM
definitely not worth $100 upgrade. and the j butterfly is a bit too big for my taste even with the expandable storage and SLCD 3. now the x8 looks amazing, pretty much a smaller one x with wp8. im not going to get the first wp8 handset that comes out though, like I did with wp7 and got super bored of the OS.
I think my mind is pretty much set.
How do you like your one x?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Best phone on the market, IMO - besides the 16GB and no expandable storage, but it's a small price to pay, honestly.
the SGS3 is nice, but I honestly love sense 4+
I came from the HTC Aria and Sense 2.1 was just meh.
I might get it if I can sell the One X for a good price, since it's still in mint condition. Otterbox'd, screen protector. I treat it like my baby
stratax said:
I have a HTC One S atm and honestly I cannot stand the pentile screen one bit. the blacks/greys are really the only good looking colors. I like everything else about it though, besides the front facing cam quality which I never really use anyways. I have had my eyes on the one x for a long while but never could get my hands on one and im thinking about selling my one s to get it.
Anyways, with the one x+ coming out should I still buy this? the only upgrade I see is ROM memory, and the front facing cam. oh and the tegra 3 which has similar performance as the s4. or is there more?
I also have my eyes on the htc x8, but no clue when that is coming out.
thanks!
edit: it would be nice to hear other peoples opinions on the phone, both cons and pros
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The One X+ is worth it just for the 64GB of storage. I am constantly having to manage stuff on my phone.
Yeah true.. on my one s I have to keep my music on the low and constantly manage it but its something ive become used to so its not a deal breaker at all considering my last two phones before this (iphone 4, nokia n9) also had 16gb of ROM memory.
and the galaxy s3 isn't worth $100-200 more than the one x since it has a much worth screen with the pentile, and worse camera, annnnd I am not a fan of the glossy cheap go phone looking plastic lol.
After playing with both phones for some time now, I decided to root my x and see which one comes out for daily use, not benchmarking. I have to say the 1 is much more enjoyable with CM10, and the battery life compared to the 1+ is much better. I do miss the dedicated headphone amp and 64GB of memory, but overall I'm much happier with the 1...who would have thought it!
I wanted the one x+, but I would've had to wait two weeks for it at my local att store... I'm happy I took the one x, and will hopefully root it once my 14 day return period with att is up
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Apart from the few things like extra storage there's no way I would consider the X+ an upgrade from the X (XL in my case). The Tegra 3 is an inferior chip in my opinion even ramping up the clock speed, increasing the battery capacity was needed to handle the extra battery drain from an already inefficient chip.
I don't think quad-cores are ready for phones yet, you can see with the Nexus 4 that the quad-core version of the same chip we have in the XL also sucks down the juice like nobody's business. My wife has the international One X with the Tegra 3 and it gets real warm even in just normal use, likewise the Nexus 4 reportedly gets quite hot and benchmark scores come in low because of thermal throttling of the cpu.
The high clocked quad of the X+ is all marketing.
Always searching for the greener pasture.
Sarsippius said:
Apart from the few things like extra storage there's no way I would consider the X+ an upgrade from the X (XL in my case). The Tegra 3 is an inferior chip in my opinion even ramping up the clock speed, increasing the battery capacity was needed to handle the extra battery drain from an already inefficient chip.
I don't think quad-cores are ready for phones yet, you can see with the Nexus 4 that the quad-core version of the same chip we have in the XL also sucks down the juice like nobody's business. My wife has the international One X with the Tegra 3 and it gets real warm even in just normal use, likewise the Nexus 4 reportedly gets quite hot and benchmark scores come in low because of thermal throttling of the cpu.
The high clocked quad of the X+ is all marketing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the issue with the nexus 4 is Android 4.2. All devices running it are getting pretty ho hum battery life. Several others bugs as well.
But yeah S4 (even dual) beats Tegra 3.
Sent from my Nexus 7
Artood2s said:
I think the issue with the nexus 4 is Android 4.2. All devices running it are getting pretty ho hum battery life. Several others bugs as well.
But yeah S4 (even dual) beats Tegra 3.
Sent from my Nexus 7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OP so did you totally get rid of your One X+? I just picked it up and although I'm pretty satisfied with performance it's the battery life that kills me...
i'm hoping after removing some ATT bloatware with the recent root it improves but not sure...