OFFICAL ICS for o2x is out - T-Mobile LG G2x

http://www.lgmobile.co.kr/lgmobile/front/download/retrieveDownloadMain.dev#manual
That link is official ICS update for korean users!!
So few more days till drivers are out
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app

I don't understand a thing typed up on that page.
But if this is real, I will be overjoyed.

EricTheLuminant said:
I don't understand a thing typed up on that page.
But if this is real, I will be overjoyed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The OFFICIAL ics is out for su660. When kernel source cones, p990 can be made stable with the drivers in it. Which will make p999 workable when devs get to it.
Hence indirectly out of luck g2x got a life.
Sent from my LG-P999

Thanks for the quick explain :good:

RC our God will show compassion on us simple folk, for he is gracious and overflowing with ice cream sandwiches and jelly beans.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app

redmonke255 said:
RC our God will show compassion on us simple folk, for he is gracious and overflowing with ice cream sandwiches and jelly beans.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks.. but who exactly is RC... I heard about him a lot... he seems very important but Im noobie here
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app

http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/Community_Members

jnhsd0319 said:
Thanks.. but who exactly is RC... I heard about him a lot... he seems very important but Im noobie here
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He's the reason we have anything on our phone. He's a true developer, not just someone who can compile pre made work. He lays the basis for all the roms.
Sent from my paranoid Nexus 7.

jnhsd0319 said:
http://www.lgmobile.co.kr/lgmobile/front/download/retrieveDownloadMain.dev#manual
That link is official ICS update for korean users!!
So few more days till drivers are out
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm beside myself. This just made my day!

redmonke255 said:
He's the reason we have anything on our phone. He's a true developer, not just someone who can compile pre made work. He lays the basis for all the roms.
Sent from my paranoid Nexus 7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
faux123 is also very skilled!
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium

What's LG's turnaround for releasing source been like in the past?

FatalityBoyZahy said:
faux123 is also very skilled!
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Each n every Dev here is skilled. For me there has always been 3 kind of peoples. People who are end users who just buy the phone and fear to fiddle with it cuz it will void the warranty. Others are power users who doesn't care about warranty and do flashing testing and even sometimes tweaking the code (these are the extreme power users). The last are developers some who add their own logic to the code to add new things and fix things the others are extreme developers (who has the android code in their brains like people in LG and Ricardo and last but never the least Google itself)
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2

redmonke255 said:
He's the reason we have anything on our phone. He's a true developer, not just someone who can compile pre made work. He lays the basis for all the roms.
Sent from my paranoid Nexus 7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
RC is the cyanogenmod developer who is in charge of the LG devices. But that's not to say everyone else isn't skilled cmon man.
Sent from my LG-G2x using XDA Developers app.

Aricrj said:
RC is the cyanogenmod developer who is in charge of the LG devices. But that's not to say everyone else isn't skilled cmon man.
Sent from my LG-G2x using XDA Developers app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't mean to say the others aren't skilled. RC just does the forefront of developing while most developers use his work plus other cherry picks. It's way more than I do, for sure.
And I was just talking about rom devs, faux and morfic are amazing kernel devs. Every dev here is awesome, but we need to really credit RC for the huge amount of work he puts into our phone.
Sent from my paranoid Nexus 7.

paxton said:
What's LG's turnaround for releasing source been like in the past?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Optimus black's source hit in a couple days.

So what about the news that the Atrix has a leaked official build of ICS now? It's the only other Tegra 2 device that is exactly like our phone. If it would have came out months ago it would have been nice but now that it's out so soon to an official release for the p990 it makes me kind of sad.

psychoace said:
So what about the news that the Atrix has a leaked official build of ICS now? It's the only other Tegra 2 device that is exactly like our phone. If it would have came out months ago it would have been nice but now that it's out so soon to an official release for the p990 it makes me kind of sad.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Been covered before, the Atrix is a bit too different to be of much help. It's a Tegra 2 but there are some differences.
I'm just concerned if the Korean Su660 is similar enough to the P990, and thus the P999, for its source to be of use, or if we still need to wait for p990 source?
My secondary concern is that there will be additional time/issues getting all this to work on Jelly Bean, which is what the "cool devs" are going to work on anyway.

lotherius said:
Been covered before, the Atrix is a bit too different to be of much help. It's a Tegra 2 but there are some differences.
I'm just concerned if the Korean Su660 is similar enough to the P990, and thus the P999, for its source to be of use, or if we still need to wait for p990 source?
My secondary concern is that there will be additional time/issues getting all this to work on Jelly Bean, which is what the "cool devs" are going to work on anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's the same phone, minus a button + an antenna. Besides, the p990 is pretty much a p999 with a different radio and partition, while the su660 is the same with different kernel level changes (as the p990) (or something along these lines. It will get us cm10 though)

lotherius said:
Been covered before, the Atrix is a bit too different to be of much help. It's a Tegra 2 but there are some differences.
I'm just concerned if the Korean Su660 is similar enough to the P990, and thus the P999, for its source to be of use, or if we still need to wait for p990 source?
My secondary concern is that there will be additional time/issues getting all this to work on Jelly Bean, which is what the "cool devs" are going to work on anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as i know, the difference from ICS to JB is MUCH MUCH smaler than GB to ICS. From what ive collected so far, if we got the ics source we will be able to get JB to work almost flawlessly, maybe not perfect, but a normal user like myself wouldnt be able to tell any difference.
To me that is great news

hhwong said:
As far as i know, the difference from ICS to JB is MUCH MUCH smaler than GB to ICS. From what ive collected so far, if we got the ics source we will be able to get JB to work almost flawlessly, maybe not perfect, but a normal user like myself wouldnt be able to tell any difference.
To me that is great news
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, with source for ICS, JB will run fine.
My Iconia tablet was upgraded to ICS stock, than with the source, the devs pounded out a fully functional JB ROM. I use it as my daily driver.

Related

Official ICS discussion thread

Post all of your wants, needs,and desires about ICS here. Rumors, facts, whatever else are also welcome.
the new internet browser will sync your contacts with google chrome sync. nice eh?
books app now supports tablet sizes
new updated calender syncing
new camera app
stock email and exchange email now separate apps
face locking
new gallery
google based text to speach API
music by beta music sync
NFC (boo hoo)
Google video EDITOR
google tags??
basic new things to look for,
So The Nexus One isn't getting official ICS because it doesn't have enough space on the system partition(speculation as no one officially knows the real reason) but do you think this will be the case for many phones including the Captivate? Would suck if the bottleneck for peoples phones would be “not enough space"
*Get Chance and Luck*
There was a link to an article (unofficial) that said Galaxy S, Nexus S, and something else would get ICS.
Captain_Nero said:
So The Nexus One isn't getting official ICS because it doesn't have enough space on the system partition(speculation as no one officially knows the real reason) but do you think this will be the case for many phones including the Captivate? Would suck if the bottleneck for peoples phones would be “not enough space"
*Get Chance and Luck*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Miui developers have successfully ported ics to the captivate. Link to the article is in the miui thread.
Sent from my SGH-I896 running MIUI.
The cappy is definitely capable of running fully fledged ics smooth to googles standards as it has essentially the same internals as a nexus s
Vaanhoot said:
Miui developers have successfully ported ics to the captivate. Link to the article is in the miui thread.
Sent from my SGH-I896 running MIUI.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's kinda of hard to believe sense the source hasn't been released yet. Might be a port from the sdk. But its MIUI so no telling who's work they stole this time lol
zelendel said:
That's kinda of hard to believe sense the source hasn't been released yet. Might be a port from the sdk. But its MIUI so no telling who's work they stole this time lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he's referring to the port from Galnet, and your right. It is a port from the sdk.
Vaanhoot said:
Miui developers have successfully ported ics to the captivate. Link to the article is in the miui thread.
Sent from my SGH-I896 running MIUI.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I don't think it actually has been been ported onto the Captivate yet. B-eock tried but the test didn't boot.
Blu3izzy said:
Well I don't think it actually has been been ported onto the Captivate yet. B-eock tried but the test didn't boot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was trying to fix the touchscreen issue, didn't work! Still have to use two fingers. The not booting, was my mistake I messed up. It boots fine and if you wanna fix reorientation then flash glitch kernel!
Sent from my I897 using xda premium
Vaanhoot said:
Miui developers have successfully ported ics to the captivate. Link to the article is in the miui thread.
Sent from my SGH-I896 running MIUI.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to know, I can finally sleep at night.
*Get Chance and Luck*
Vaanhoot said:
Miui developers have successfully ported ics to the captivate. Link to the article is in the miui thread.
Sent from my SGH-I896 running MIUI.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Care to link us to it?
Sent from my I897 using xda premium
Vaanhoot said:
Miui developers have successfully ported ics to the captivate. Link to the article is in the miui thread.
Sent from my SGH-I896 running MIUI.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only link I saw over there was the galaxy s port
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
b-eock said:
I was trying to fix the touchscreen issue, didn't work! Still have to use two fingers. The not booting, was my mistake I messed up. It boots fine and if you wanna fix reorientation then flash glitch kernel!
Sent from my I897 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ooooooohhhh ok. I want to help out with this project, so I'm going to try to help out with the touchscreen issue.
Captain_Nero said:
So The Nexus One isn't getting official ICS because it doesn't have enough space on the system partition(speculation as no one officially knows the real reason) but do you think this will be the case for many phones including the Captivate? Would suck if the bottleneck for peoples phones would be “not enough space"
*Get Chance and Luck*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The main speculation for why the Nexus One is not getting ICS comes down to two things: ROM storage for the system and the processor speed.
First, the Nexus One only comes equipped with 512MB of ROM. After the system files are installed, it leaves something around 200MB for apps, which is not a lot. ICS is supposed to take even more space than GB, so having something like 50-100MB for user apps would be likely...and unpleasant.
The Galaxy S phones all have 2GB of internal ROM I believe, so I don't think that issue will apply.
Second, the Nexus One has an older 1Ghz "Snapdragon" SoC. Although clocked the same as a Galaxy S phone, it is made with an older design, and performs less work per cycle. According to a few articles I have seen, the "Hummingbird" SoC in the Galaxy S phones has up to 3 times the GPU power of the older "Snapdragon" SoC...and roughly a 30% increase in real world performance.
Given that ICS will have hardware acceleration for 2D drawing, the slower processor (especially slow for GPU type elements) is likely a big hindrance, that again, should not apply to the Galaxy S line.
So keep your fingers crossed for this I guess. I will be! I am confident there will be a working unofficial release, but very doubtful about anything official.
ICS for SGS i9000 post
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=18872533
Funny watching the threads over time, where is our froyo?
The i900 has ginger bread. Now where is my ice cream sandwich, even before a device us officially released with it.
First real port will be when the cm team gets it going. Imho
Sent from my HTC Flyer P512 using xda premium
mcord11758 said:
Funny watching the threads over time, where is our froyo?
The i900 has ginger bread. Now where is my ice cream sandwich, even before a device us officially released with it.
First real port will be when the cm team gets it going. Imho
Sent from my HTC Flyer P512 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your probably right about CM. We know that att is the only reason we don't have official gb.
mrhaley30705 said:
Your probably right about CM. We know that att is the only reason we don't have official gb.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They have to sell their new devices.
Sent from my HTC Flyer P512 using xda premium
mcord11758 said:
They have to sell their new devices.
Sent from my HTC Flyer P512 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mcord11758 glad to see you around
Sent from my I897 using xda premium

Please sign this petition about ICS update

Please take little time to sign this petition in the hope of getting an ICS update in our galaxy s 4g phone:
it's in change.org, I can't post the full link because I'm new member.
We believe it's capable of running ice cream sandwich.
We already are gonna get the update, just not right away
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA
mierkat09 said:
We already are gonna get the update, just not right away
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude are you serious? Samsung told everyone that the original Galaxy S line wasn't gonna get it due to hardware limitations. They can't get it with touchwiz so we don't get it at all
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
brandonc0526 said:
Dude are you serious? Samsung told everyone that the original Galaxy S line wasn't gonna get it due to hardware limitations. They can't get it with touchwiz so we don't get it at all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was what they said at first, but supposedly they changed their mind. There was a thread about it a while back
Found the link for you:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1579167
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA
karl7777 said:
Please take little time to sign this petition in the hope of getting an ICS update in our galaxy s 4g phone:
it's in change.org, I can't post the full link because I'm new member.
We believe it's capable of running ice cream sandwich.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do you think the sgs4g needs to get ics? My phone is fast got extremely great battery life and tons of other things. Do you just want ics so you could have the latest android flavor or do you think or know it will make our phones that much better. I'm not trying to be a smartass just curious why ppl are this rilled up about ics.
I think the only reason is because "others have it".
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
Great words blazen you know maybe ics has some quiet interesting features but our developers make than our phone from crappy to gingerbread better than ics that is one the reasons I want to start developing because I feel that I got skills to make some good stuff for the phone ( like themes and guides only things that i have finished) and other reason is because here our developers are way better than samsungs horrible costumer service....anyway every sgs4g user most appreciete the developers work even if the projects are not finished like ics port and aosp port because that makes people more happy and they know that there works are awesome
blazen2000 said:
Why do you think the sgs4g needs to get ics?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe that most want it because it is the newest OS and most believe it will be an improvement, much like GB compared to Froyo... Which is understandable considering the developers here are going full bore in a attempt to port ICS.
Being one of those that was satisfied with froyo, I have to admit I am even more satisfied with GB... But as for your question, I personally hope that it is released for our phone because if it is, so to would the source be released (just imagine what the developers could accomplish with it).
Just my 2 cents in the well.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
mierkat09 said:
That was what they said at first, but supposedly they changed their mind. There was a thread about it a while back
Found the link for you:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1579167
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do realize that's a post from someone in the forums right? No word from Samsung USA. You cannot depend on what a customer service rep says, they sit behind the computer all day and still do not know a thing about the products they are supposed to be supporting. They are just trying to shut us up about it already. If the OG galaxy s gets just a value pack, it'd be hard to imagine them bending backwards to give us full ICS
Mwuhahahahahaha
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
Well looks like bhundev is cooking up something. Devs are the real work horses around here.
I'd much rather see ICS from Team Acid than from Samsung
farmerbb said:
I'd much rather see ICS from Team Acid than from Samsung
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, best quote today =)...me, too...Samsung (customer sevices) is sucks =]] (but their devices are not lol :">)
Thanks to Jt1134 and Bryan men
I don't particularly care for ICS ....
I'm quite happy with GB.
Besides.... ICS is just about outdated with Jellybeans on the way LOL.
Can't wait to see what our devs can do with jellybeans ;-)
jt1134 said:
Mwuhahahahahaha
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You rock dude! Can't wait!
Shortbus-Driver said:
I don't particularly care for ICS ....
I'm quite happy with GB.
Besides.... ICS is just about outdated with Jellybeans on the way LOL.
Can't wait to see what our devs can do with jellybeans ;-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pfft, you're gonna poop your pants :victory:
bhundven said:
Pfft, you're gonna poop your pants :victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ill get my diapers ready
If I am not mistaken the T-Mobile version is the same as the Telus S2 in Canada. If it is I would not be in any hurry to upgrade to ICS. My own experience and experience of others as reported on the Howardforums has not been stellar. Problems with apps freezing and battery life going in the toilet are common. Looks great, just doesn't work very well. I would hold off until these issues are addressed. I usually always wait to do an update until I here some feedback but this time I jumped in and am now regretting it.
Just a word to the wise

Jelly Beans Came out, is anything from NVIDIA Drivers Yet?

MAN is on the news so far Jelly beans come out. Is any news for LG GX2 ?
We dont even have complete ics and you are talking about jb
Sent via G2X-SINGH-UI
ICS is to Jelly Bean as Vista was to Windows 7. At least until we see JB running on something.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Волк said:
ICS is to Jelly Bean as Vista was to Windows 7. At least until we see JB running on something.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeap agree lets hope that now wit the new jb release. But whats the big deal with nvidia on not releasing the necessary driver on ICS ?
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Doubt this device will run jb. Its on it last leg
ayysir said:
Doubt this device will run jb. Its on it last leg
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well anything is possible.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDsOtdRtG0Q&feature=player_embedded
Need. It. Now. :laugh:
Blazing angel said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDsOtdRtG0Q&feature=player_embedded
Need. It. Now. :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May be Nvidia was waiting for this release in order to let go the drivers.
But i dough it, some how they always want to make more money over it.
My very sincere gratittudes to the Devs for making this Betas on ICS so far so good
even with few scripts it makes it a lot easier to handle the few bugs over the betas
I wish Google would focus on getting ICS on every Android before upgrading the OS again and alienating even more users.
My first Android phone never even got Gingerbread despite what LG said (surprise surprise).
partylikeaninjastar said:
I wish Google would focus on getting ICS on every Android before upgrading the OS again and alienating even more users.
My first Android phone never even got Gingerbread despite what LG said (surprise surprise).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not Google's Fault LG raped our phones hard and sideways. The code is there for them from Google LG just wants us to buy a newer phone or enjoy Gingerbread
Sent from a G2x in Hell
str8killinya said:
Its not Google's Fault LG raped our phones hard and sideways. The code is there for them from Google LG just wants us to buy a newer phone or enjoy Gingerbread
Sent from a G2x in Hell
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree bro. :good:
Is there any photos to what jelly bean will look like"
-Sent From My G2X Running Miui
9595jakob said:
Is there any photos to what jelly bean will look like"
-Sent From My G2X Running Miui
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For just astetics its really the same as ICS with an updated search bar and different wallpapers
Sent from my LG-G2x using Tapatalk 2
And extremely fast frame rate now, and little tricks in the notification drawer also. Google voice search is revamped and a lot better. Cosmetically little difference over all though.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
DJLamontagneIII said:
For just astetics its really the same as ICS with an updated search bar and different wallpapers
Sent from my LG-G2x using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously....that's so gay...
-Sent From My G2X Running Miui
9595jakob said:
Seriously....that's so gay...
-Sent From My G2X Running Miui
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why? 2.0 to 2.1 and 2.2 was that way... you couldn't possibly expect them to revamp the whole ui after ICS, could you?
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
9595jakob said:
Is there any photos to what jelly bean will look like"
-Sent From My G2X Running Miui
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats Pretty much the same as ICS only differences based on the forums and the news is that is just an update for ics. But i believe that it has many bugs fixed and new features.
Any word on when the drivers will be released? I was reading by the end of this month or maybe I was dreaming .:screwy:
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
kepapas said:
Any word on when the drivers will be released? I was reading by the end of this month or maybe I was dreaming .:screwy:
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I sure wish they'd be released or an official ics release for the O2x happens, G2x would take that much longer, either way, I'd be happy.
Sent from my Nokia 3310 paperweight.
Yeah I read that only about 7% percent of phones are running ics.its really a mess google is creating,by the time a lot of phone get ics it will be like 2013-14 when a new update has come.they should really take a 2 to 3 year gap window.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app

G2x one step closer to ICS and JB

http://www.xda-developers.com/android/lg-su660-kernel-source-released-may-help-g2x/
according to XDA Su660( O2x) has kernal source released for JB!!!! and the kernal might also work with P999(g2x) which is good news for us
joyj112 said:
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/lg-su660-kernel-source-released-may-help-g2x/
according to XDA Su660( O2x) has kernal source released for JB!!!! and the kernal might also work with P999(g2x) which is good news for us
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No sh!t!? Are you sure about that? Now a hand will show up from your phone and will slap you in:5...4....3....2....1 SLAP!:cyclops:
OMG are you serious...
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
*Facepalm*
Wow to wake up everyday and see a new post about such old **** makes my day... Really it does... haha
Just because of how much life will be brought back to this wonderful device...
Sent from my LG-G2x using XDA Developers app.
Please close this thread.
Sent via G2X-SINGH-UI
Or just delete it.
Wow, way to go LG! They are trying to win us back over by bringing the updates they just gave us ICS and now JB? Woohoo!
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
I doubt that's why lg did it. Bottom line they don't care about this device anymore. We do they don't.
Sent from my G2X using EaglesBlood build 5
There is only ics sources so dont get too happy, i highly doubt we will get jb from cm team as well since its more work then just porting over. ICS kernel by lg only covers p990 and su660. If RC makes one for us, thats great else we are basically on our own. Please stop spamming for this crap already. T-Mobile & nvidia along with lg has screwed us.
Sent via G2X-SINGH-UI
Lmfaoooooooooooo
nycelitemaster said:
There is only ics sources so dont get too happy, i highly doubt we will get jb from cm team as well since its more work then just porting over. ICS kernel by lg only covers p990 and su660. If RC makes one for us, thats great else we are basically on our own. Please stop spamming for this crap already. T-Mobile & nvidia along with lg has screwed us.
Sent via G2X-SINGH-UI
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Umm..... The ICS sources are compatible with JB. And RC has already started development for it.... He's most likely fixing the majority of bugs for the p990 and then porting it to the p999 so yeah.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
This whole sub is getting ridiculous, the mods should limit conversation to talk of cases and extended batteries till RC is done with his work and we can all go back to being our curmudgeonly selves with CM10.
Porting still not done?
sent from my phone using tapahoe 2
supersilko said:
Porting still not done?
sent from my phone using tapahoe 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Srsly...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
murdah204 said:
Srsly...
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can either of you two do better? cause I know I can't.
If we can we would ask for help
sent from my phone using tapahoe 2
This thread and op are spamming.
Geesh..
G2x-temasek CM7 build135.4 w/faux 054 kernel
Also it's not just spamming, it's an actual liability for us. Let me repeat this: bugging the devs (namely RC) may threaten our chances of ever getting a viable port of CM10 and 10.1. RC has already shut down the O2x thread because of (*) whining about timelines, problems already answered and general crap that doesn't help development. We should keep our forum strong and lively so the devs know we are still here and hungry, but that we aren't a bunch of freeloaders (which we are actually) that feel entitled to their time and effort.

Something unsuspecting

A developer we know of is returning to the Mecha. Since the recent agreement between Google and Qualcomm - they plan to allow old phones support for newer Android (Legacy) versions -
Expect something huge to be making its way back to the Mecha. And it looks a lot like AOSP.
Klonopin said:
A developer we know of is returning to the Mecha. Since the recent agreement between Google and Qualcomm - they plan to allow old phones support for newer Android (Legacy) versions -
Expect something huge to be making its way back to the Mecha. And it looks a lot like AOSP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would this have anything to do with CyanogenMod?
OMG Please dear god. Somebody take my money!
+1
+1
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
Sweet mother of Neptune say this isn't some false hope.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
Why can't people just come out and say what it is.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
Dark Jedi said:
Why can't people just come out and say what it is.
The Jedi strikes again!!!
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just say what it is already. CM stated a long time ago that if we got an official ics build they would try making cm9 but who knows if that is still on the books.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
This thread smells of failure...
Sent from my ADR6400L using xda app-developers app
Don't they need a Kernel Source first?
musicfreak190 said:
Don't they need a Kernel Source first?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes they would technically but there are ways around that.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
I like the sound of that.. but why can't they just release it... I would pay 200 dollars for a real AOKP or CM9 Rom w/ a custom Kernel built from source....straight up... would not think twice about the money.
musicfreak190 said:
I like the sound of that.. but why can't they just release it... I would pay 200 dollars for a real AOKP or CM9 Rom w/ a custom Kernel built from source....straight up... would not think twice about the money.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel wouldn't be made from source if they did it all. A gb kernel could be modified to work though. Like twisted did. Cm won't do that though.
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
musicfreak190 said:
I like the sound of that.. but why can't they just release it... I would pay 200 dollars for a real AOKP or CM9 Rom w/ a custom Kernel built from source....straight up... would not think twice about the money.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hell for $200.00 you can go on swappa and buy a Gnex with cm10..
SENT FROM THE DOG POUND
Patience is a virtue isn't it?
Fine, you want to know, here it is, Liquid's team broke up and left him, he remade the team replacing the devs that we're holding him back.
Qualcomm and Google made a deal and Qualcomm gave Google a huge amount of info about their hardware (the standard chip for most android phones) and now we could see Jelly Bean on the Mecha.
Since the ICS OTA drop and Liquid got a better team he's been working on some interesting stuff. Expect some new AOSP builds soon
Tell liquid when he is done that I love him and I want a personal donate button to his pay pal
Klonopin said:
Patience is a virtue isn't it?
Fine, you want to know, here it is, Liquid's team broke up and left him, he remade the team replacing the devs that we're holding him back.
Qualcomm and Google made a deal and Qualcomm gave Google a huge amount of info about their hardware (the standard chip for most android phones) and now we could see Jelly Bean on the Mecha.
Since the ICS OTA drop and Liquid got a better team he's been working on some interesting stuff. Expect some new AOSP builds soon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now was that so hard to say? Lol
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Wait, are the Qualcomm/Google and Liquid stories related?
Dark Jedi said:
Now was that so hard to say? Lol
Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol YES, IT WAS! Lol jk
lukesed said:
Wait, are the Qualcomm/Google and Liquid stories related?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not directly related, no, but because of Qualcomm and Google - this could mean that older devices will see newer Android builds. The reason Liquid came into the conversation is because he's recently had to rebuild his team, and in turn, has returned to the Mecha. This Qualcomm agreement opens new doors for ALL developers, I just know now that Mecha could actually see JB - AOSP at that.

Categories

Resources