Database Info

[Q] ICS for Infuse?

So my friend has a captivate, and he has a Stock ICS rom. I was just wondering the possibility of a Stock ICS rom for the infuse. I know there are Roms that are suppose to look like ICS, but they aren't even based off of ICS. My question is, is there a STOCK ICS rom based on android 4.0, and if not what is the likelihood of there being one?

I don't know why don't you use the search button and find out for us
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium

I did, and found nothing, except for the fact that all the ones that say ICS are just themed to ICS and not even based of ICS

Or you could look at the 5th thread in this section
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium

You mean the HellRaiser? How would this solve my problems exactly, I can't find any ICS roms for galaxy devices except the one for captivate, but it says in order to do the captivate roms, the rom needs to be based off samsung gingerbread. A true ICS Rom would be based off of Ice Cream Sandwich.

No. The one that has the title is anyone planning a custom ics rom
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium

Oh, sorry. thanks. That does suck though. I think it would be a great idea. All these developers just don't want to do it I guess. I probably would have donated to someone who would do it. Ahh well. I guess the infuse gets no love.

its not because the devs havnt tried from what i understand its a kernal problem

jerrycoffman45 said:
its not because the devs havnt tried from what i understand its a kernal problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh really? Well I guess that makes sense. I still would like to see some form of ICS on the infuse, but I suppose it's just wishful thinking.

GuidoZebra said:
Oh really? Well I guess that makes sense. I still would like to see some form of ICS on the infuse, but I suppose it's just wishful thinking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GuidoZebra,
Read thru the general section and the Q/A section.
There are multiple posts on this topic. TONS.
Then you will understand why there won't be any ICS on the Infuse, short of a miracle.
Go back a few months.
Zeus 5.2 ICS is as close as you'll get.

You don't want ICS on this phone. Even if someone does manage it, it won't be the experience you're hoping for. It will be choppy, buggy and alot of functions won't work. Maybe some super-dev will have a breakthrough this year, but it will be a long time before anything usable, much less fully working is available. So don't hold your breath. Move on. Spend time with the wife and kids. Take the dog to the park. Try to enjoy life.

qkster said:
GuidoZebra,
Read thru the general section and the Q/A section.
There are multiple posts on this topic. TONS.
Then you will understand why there won't be any ICS on the Infuse, short of a miracle.
Go back a few months.
Zeus 5.2 ICS is as close as you'll get.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ajerman..... he was making one.

Was... key word...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium

I'm running 4.0.3 on my cappy and my inspire... and yet, my infuse with Zeus is still my daily driver, and my fav ... ics got old, really quick...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium

dman3285 said:
Was... key word...
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously he is not anymore? Wow if i can find a post from him i want to contact him, but can not find any of them lol.
dman3285 said:
I'm running 4.0.3 on my cappy and my inspire... and yet, my infuse with Zeus is still my daily driver, and my fav ... ics got old, really quick...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe you, your work is amazing. If it werent from my stupid usb going broke or my parents being lazy and not getting my another (getting the note lol, new infuse to dad. Hoping to see you helping over there!) but just seeing that ics theming and the number 4.0 really makes people go nuts, like me except its more tame now lol.

Thanks bro
sent from my SGH-I897 on ICS FUSION 4.0.3

dman3285 said:
Thanks bro
sent from my SGH-I897 on ICS FUSION 4.0.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its true, no doubts about that. Seeing that 4.0.3 drives me nuts on your sig lol just kidding. Back on topic, has anyone contacted ajerman lately? (or by chance he sees this lol).

since infuse is getting old we should all upgrade to the note or wait for the gs3
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium

aerostargt said:
since infuse is getting old we should all upgrade to the note or wait for the gs3
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most people can not, only have upgrade for every two years (some may have it like me, have two other upgrades to use. Im just going to time them perfectly so every like 7-8 months we can get a new phone that is state-of-the-art lol.)

aerostargt said:
since infuse is getting old we should all upgrade to the note or wait for the gs3
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's been less than a year it's been selling isn't it? WoW things age fast. Luckily my SGS is still going great. Thanks to all the devs around here.
My Infuse comes tonight. Let me see what best I can do with it. Or am I getting an Outdated Phone LoL.

Please sign this petition about ICS update

Please take little time to sign this petition in the hope of getting an ICS update in our galaxy s 4g phone:
it's in change.org, I can't post the full link because I'm new member.
We believe it's capable of running ice cream sandwich.

We already are gonna get the update, just not right away
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA

mierkat09 said:
We already are gonna get the update, just not right away
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude are you serious? Samsung told everyone that the original Galaxy S line wasn't gonna get it due to hardware limitations. They can't get it with touchwiz so we don't get it at all

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA

brandonc0526 said:
Dude are you serious? Samsung told everyone that the original Galaxy S line wasn't gonna get it due to hardware limitations. They can't get it with touchwiz so we don't get it at all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was what they said at first, but supposedly they changed their mind. There was a thread about it a while back
Found the link for you:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1579167
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA

karl7777 said:
Please take little time to sign this petition in the hope of getting an ICS update in our galaxy s 4g phone:
it's in change.org, I can't post the full link because I'm new member.
We believe it's capable of running ice cream sandwich.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do you think the sgs4g needs to get ics? My phone is fast got extremely great battery life and tons of other things. Do you just want ics so you could have the latest android flavor or do you think or know it will make our phones that much better. I'm not trying to be a smartass just curious why ppl are this rilled up about ics.

I think the only reason is because "others have it".
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium

Great words blazen you know maybe ics has some quiet interesting features but our developers make than our phone from crappy to gingerbread better than ics that is one the reasons I want to start developing because I feel that I got skills to make some good stuff for the phone ( like themes and guides only things that i have finished) and other reason is because here our developers are way better than samsungs horrible costumer service....anyway every sgs4g user most appreciete the developers work even if the projects are not finished like ics port and aosp port because that makes people more happy and they know that there works are awesome

blazen2000 said:
Why do you think the sgs4g needs to get ics?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe that most want it because it is the newest OS and most believe it will be an improvement, much like GB compared to Froyo... Which is understandable considering the developers here are going full bore in a attempt to port ICS.
Being one of those that was satisfied with froyo, I have to admit I am even more satisfied with GB... But as for your question, I personally hope that it is released for our phone because if it is, so to would the source be released (just imagine what the developers could accomplish with it).
Just my 2 cents in the well.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium

mierkat09 said:
That was what they said at first, but supposedly they changed their mind. There was a thread about it a while back
Found the link for you:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1579167
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You do realize that's a post from someone in the forums right? No word from Samsung USA. You cannot depend on what a customer service rep says, they sit behind the computer all day and still do not know a thing about the products they are supposed to be supporting. They are just trying to shut us up about it already. If the OG galaxy s gets just a value pack, it'd be hard to imagine them bending backwards to give us full ICS

Mwuhahahahahaha
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA

Well looks like bhundev is cooking up something. Devs are the real work horses around here.

I'd much rather see ICS from Team Acid than from Samsung

farmerbb said:
I'd much rather see ICS from Team Acid than from Samsung
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, best quote today =)...me, too...Samsung (customer sevices) is sucks =]] (but their devices are not lol :">)
Thanks to Jt1134 and Bryan men

I don't particularly care for ICS ....
I'm quite happy with GB.
Besides.... ICS is just about outdated with Jellybeans on the way LOL.
Can't wait to see what our devs can do with jellybeans ;-)

jt1134 said:
Mwuhahahahahaha
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You rock dude! Can't wait!

Shortbus-Driver said:
I don't particularly care for ICS ....
I'm quite happy with GB.
Besides.... ICS is just about outdated with Jellybeans on the way LOL.
Can't wait to see what our devs can do with jellybeans ;-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pfft, you're gonna poop your pants :victory:

bhundven said:
Pfft, you're gonna poop your pants :victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ill get my diapers ready

If I am not mistaken the T-Mobile version is the same as the Telus S2 in Canada. If it is I would not be in any hurry to upgrade to ICS. My own experience and experience of others as reported on the Howardforums has not been stellar. Problems with apps freezing and battery life going in the toilet are common. Looks great, just doesn't work very well. I would hold off until these issues are addressed. I usually always wait to do an update until I here some feedback but this time I jumped in and am now regretting it.
Just a word to the wise

I need miui rom for p6800

I need miui rom for p6800
Can any one tell me that can done or it is a dream
Sent from my GT-P6800 using XDA Premium HD app

Hahaha and I need a million bucks and want to fly to the moon...
MIUI? Unlikely giving the low level of dev support for the device. Maybe once we get CM9/10 working people will consider...even then..
Also this should not be in development...

General or Q/A
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda premium

MIUI is interesting, but does it really afford any advantages with a tablet? Do you use your 7.7 as a regular phone as well?

burhanistan said:
MIUI is interesting, but does it really afford any advantages with a tablet? Do you use your 7.7 as a regular phone as well?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes
Sent from my GT-P6800 using XDA Premium HD app

try to download from bbs.gfan.com

Well, I'm no developer, but i did give it a go.
I followed this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=22574965
I couldn't get passed the Samsung boot screen. Tried clearing everything but still failed.
Heart in mouth, i restored my cm9 cwm image.
Sent from my GT-P6810

Quicksilver or Zeta
fastest said:
Well, I'm no developer, but i did give it a go.
I followed this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=22574965
I couldn't get passed the Samsung boot screen. Tried clearing everything but still failed.
Heart in mouth, i restored my cm9 cwm image.
Sent from my GT-P6810
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried Quicksilver or Zeta - what is so special about MIUI? (I know it's good, but there are other good/better alternatives)

manuarh said:
Have you tried Quicksilver or Zeta - what is so special about MIUI? (I know it's good, but there are other good/better alternatives)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both of those roms are for 6800 only. I'm using locerras cm9 which is great.
I've been using miui since sgs1 days and still using on my sgs3. Its pretty and more refined looking compared to cm9. No disrespect intended.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk

MIUI is good
fastest said:
Both of those roms are for 6800 only. I'm using locerras cm9 which is great.
I've been using miui since sgs1 days and still using on my sgs3. Its pretty and more refined looking compared to cm9. No disrespect intended.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I was using miui on my hd2 leo at least a year ago and I was impressed with it.

No progress with MIUI? Its will be super to have it on our device, I use it on my phone for more then year and really like it))

@ndrey said:
No progress with MIUI? Its will be super to have it on our device, I use it on my phone for more then year and really like it))
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I need miui too!!!

MIUI would be nice. +1

https://github.com/MiCode
You are all free to do it.
Now seriously, if no developer is interested on working with it, no developer will work with it, and it won't be ported to the 7.7. Since MIUI has been closed source (despite being basically a fork of CM for a long time), people tend to dislike it. A lot. If you believe it's worth to port it, be aware that you either need to do it yourself OR try to convince some specific developer to do it.
I wouldn't hold my breath, though. Even the much bigger CM10.x has only a couple of developers on our tabs (three, if you count aorth who uses the very similar Tab 7 Plus and builds for the 7.7 occasionally).

Jelly Bean 4.1.1 has been ported to the Galaxy S

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=28182724
Maybe we won't be too far behind.
Sent from my GT-P6210 using xda premium

Wow. The rate at which the developers move is astonishing. Gonna let my friend know so I can play with his SGS.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda app-developers app

JB can take all the time in the world. I'm still soaking in ICS. I'm totally satisfied with what our devs have done, and it wouldn't bother me a bit if they didn't mess with JB. There's still a lot of potential to be found with our ICS right now anyways. Just let it go, and if one of them want to do it, they will. Or, you can slide one of them a chunk of cash and tell them what you want, lol.

It doesn't hurt to discuss it. Once people become annoying with requests for JB, then it's a different story.
I wonder how smoothly it actually runs on the SGS.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda app-developers app

I wonder how much more we could use the newest platforms.
I mean, it's based on a new and improved code but also is based on the assumption of running on better devices.
ICS is running nicely on our device, but i'm not sure JB will.

itzik2sh said:
I wonder how much more we could use the newest platforms.
I mean, it's based on a new and improved code but also is based on the assumption of running on better devices.
ICS is running nicely on our device, but i'm not sure JB will.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was under the impression that Project Butter indicated the emphasis on performance in JB. So could it be that if (or hopefully when) it gets ported over, it could actually end up being smoother than ICS?

Wodensman said:
JB can take all the time in the world. I'm still soaking in ICS. I'm totally satisfied with what our devs have done, and it wouldn't bother me a bit if they didn't mess with JB. There's still a lot of potential to be found with our ICS right now anyways. Just let it go, and if one of them want to do it, they will. Or, you can slide one of them a chunk of cash and tell them what you want, lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly!
Sent from my SGH-T959V using Tapatalk

What could possibly be smoother than ice cream? Parkay maybe?
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium

I wonder how was JB performance..smoother than ICS or still the same?? yet...let's stay at ICS and appreciate what ROM we have right now...JB? It's a long way to go..

ken120 said:
I wonder how was JB performance..smoother than ICS or still the same?? yet...let's stay at ICS and appreciate what ROM we have right now...JB? It's a long way to go..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Smoother than ICS. Just got done playing with a test build of CM10 on my other phone(I727). Zero lag and I mean zero. Whether will be able to port it remains to be seen and the ICS ROMS we've gotten over the past month are huge. Still never hurts to discuss it.

@hechoen But then again, the SGS 2 has a dual-core processor. Our hardware may be too outdated.

Just like we were too outdated for ics? Lol
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda app-developers app

adobrakic said:
@hechoen But then again, the SGS 2 has a dual-core processor. Our hardware may be too outdated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea but it runs fine on the nexus s which has nearly 100% of the same hardware. Any device that can run ics can also run jb. It matters more about optimization than hardware specs

Man, that's so awesome to hear.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda app-developers app

If we are capable of running ics then we can definitely run jb

Regarding OP
It'll be a little bit.
We're still trying to get ICS under control. We're using a GB kernel (2.6.35.7) modified to work with ICS (ics was designed for 3.0.8). We still have issues with sleep and a number of other issues we have noted on our github.
Granted, we will release a source built Jellybean build at some point and it will be based off of what the Galaxy S & variants device maintainers do, but we are still playing catch up to them on Gingerbread and Ice Cream Sandwich.
I hate giving ETAs, but we'll have something within the next month and a half.

m4xm4n said:
It'll be a little bit.
We're still trying to get ICS under control. We're using a GB kernel (2.6.35.7) modified to work with ICS (ics was designed for 3.0.8). We still have issues with sleep and a number of other issues we have noted on our github.
Granted, we will release a source built Jellybean build at some point and it will be based off of what the Galaxy S & variants device maintainers do, but we are still playing catch up to them on Gingerbread and Ice Cream Sandwich.
I hate giving ETAs, but we'll have something within the next month and a half.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's awesome man, our community could not ask for better devs

Thread closed for cleaning.

OFFICAL ICS for o2x is out

http://www.lgmobile.co.kr/lgmobile/front/download/retrieveDownloadMain.dev#manual
That link is official ICS update for korean users!!
So few more days till drivers are out
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app

I don't understand a thing typed up on that page.
But if this is real, I will be overjoyed.

EricTheLuminant said:
I don't understand a thing typed up on that page.
But if this is real, I will be overjoyed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The OFFICIAL ics is out for su660. When kernel source cones, p990 can be made stable with the drivers in it. Which will make p999 workable when devs get to it.
Hence indirectly out of luck g2x got a life.
Sent from my LG-P999

Thanks for the quick explain :good:

RC our God will show compassion on us simple folk, for he is gracious and overflowing with ice cream sandwiches and jelly beans.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app

redmonke255 said:
RC our God will show compassion on us simple folk, for he is gracious and overflowing with ice cream sandwiches and jelly beans.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks.. but who exactly is RC... I heard about him a lot... he seems very important but Im noobie here
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app

http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/Community_Members

jnhsd0319 said:
Thanks.. but who exactly is RC... I heard about him a lot... he seems very important but Im noobie here
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He's the reason we have anything on our phone. He's a true developer, not just someone who can compile pre made work. He lays the basis for all the roms.
Sent from my paranoid Nexus 7.

jnhsd0319 said:
http://www.lgmobile.co.kr/lgmobile/front/download/retrieveDownloadMain.dev#manual
That link is official ICS update for korean users!!
So few more days till drivers are out
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm beside myself. This just made my day!

redmonke255 said:
He's the reason we have anything on our phone. He's a true developer, not just someone who can compile pre made work. He lays the basis for all the roms.
Sent from my paranoid Nexus 7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
faux123 is also very skilled!
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium

What's LG's turnaround for releasing source been like in the past?

FatalityBoyZahy said:
faux123 is also very skilled!
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Each n every Dev here is skilled. For me there has always been 3 kind of peoples. People who are end users who just buy the phone and fear to fiddle with it cuz it will void the warranty. Others are power users who doesn't care about warranty and do flashing testing and even sometimes tweaking the code (these are the extreme power users). The last are developers some who add their own logic to the code to add new things and fix things the others are extreme developers (who has the android code in their brains like people in LG and Ricardo and last but never the least Google itself)
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2

redmonke255 said:
He's the reason we have anything on our phone. He's a true developer, not just someone who can compile pre made work. He lays the basis for all the roms.
Sent from my paranoid Nexus 7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
RC is the cyanogenmod developer who is in charge of the LG devices. But that's not to say everyone else isn't skilled cmon man.
Sent from my LG-G2x using XDA Developers app.

Aricrj said:
RC is the cyanogenmod developer who is in charge of the LG devices. But that's not to say everyone else isn't skilled cmon man.
Sent from my LG-G2x using XDA Developers app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't mean to say the others aren't skilled. RC just does the forefront of developing while most developers use his work plus other cherry picks. It's way more than I do, for sure.
And I was just talking about rom devs, faux and morfic are amazing kernel devs. Every dev here is awesome, but we need to really credit RC for the huge amount of work he puts into our phone.
Sent from my paranoid Nexus 7.

paxton said:
What's LG's turnaround for releasing source been like in the past?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Optimus black's source hit in a couple days.

So what about the news that the Atrix has a leaked official build of ICS now? It's the only other Tegra 2 device that is exactly like our phone. If it would have came out months ago it would have been nice but now that it's out so soon to an official release for the p990 it makes me kind of sad.

psychoace said:
So what about the news that the Atrix has a leaked official build of ICS now? It's the only other Tegra 2 device that is exactly like our phone. If it would have came out months ago it would have been nice but now that it's out so soon to an official release for the p990 it makes me kind of sad.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Been covered before, the Atrix is a bit too different to be of much help. It's a Tegra 2 but there are some differences.
I'm just concerned if the Korean Su660 is similar enough to the P990, and thus the P999, for its source to be of use, or if we still need to wait for p990 source?
My secondary concern is that there will be additional time/issues getting all this to work on Jelly Bean, which is what the "cool devs" are going to work on anyway.

lotherius said:
Been covered before, the Atrix is a bit too different to be of much help. It's a Tegra 2 but there are some differences.
I'm just concerned if the Korean Su660 is similar enough to the P990, and thus the P999, for its source to be of use, or if we still need to wait for p990 source?
My secondary concern is that there will be additional time/issues getting all this to work on Jelly Bean, which is what the "cool devs" are going to work on anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's the same phone, minus a button + an antenna. Besides, the p990 is pretty much a p999 with a different radio and partition, while the su660 is the same with different kernel level changes (as the p990) (or something along these lines. It will get us cm10 though)

lotherius said:
Been covered before, the Atrix is a bit too different to be of much help. It's a Tegra 2 but there are some differences.
I'm just concerned if the Korean Su660 is similar enough to the P990, and thus the P999, for its source to be of use, or if we still need to wait for p990 source?
My secondary concern is that there will be additional time/issues getting all this to work on Jelly Bean, which is what the "cool devs" are going to work on anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as i know, the difference from ICS to JB is MUCH MUCH smaler than GB to ICS. From what ive collected so far, if we got the ics source we will be able to get JB to work almost flawlessly, maybe not perfect, but a normal user like myself wouldnt be able to tell any difference.
To me that is great news

hhwong said:
As far as i know, the difference from ICS to JB is MUCH MUCH smaler than GB to ICS. From what ive collected so far, if we got the ics source we will be able to get JB to work almost flawlessly, maybe not perfect, but a normal user like myself wouldnt be able to tell any difference.
To me that is great news
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, with source for ICS, JB will run fine.
My Iconia tablet was upgraded to ICS stock, than with the source, the devs pounded out a fully functional JB ROM. I use it as my daily driver.