For anyone who wants them, hikarugo over at the Galaxy S III forums posted a flashable zip for the Jelly Bean animations here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1738329
I've flashed it over IceCold and it works great (it should work on any ICS ROM) - however, you must remember to mount /system before flashing.
Enjoy, and of course go thank him over in the original thread!
Nickamina said:
For anyone who wants them, hikarugo over at the Galaxy S III forums posted a flashable zip for the Jelly Bean animations here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1738329
I've flashed it over IceCold and it works great (it should work on any ICS ROM) - however, you must remember to mount /system before flashing.
Enjoy, and of course go thank him over in the original thread!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stick to the forum rules please!
This thread already exist!
totiadrenalin said:
Stick to the forum rules please!
This thread already exist!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've read the rules - wasn't aware of any other thread upon searching. Apologies.
A complaint of my own - your post doesn't help anyone.
Post a URL to the existing thread next time for those who stumble across this one.
JB Animations
Started 5 days before this thread AND in the proper place
Related
The "all-in-one-location" XDA Skyrocket General Info/Root Method/Kernel/ROM Thread!
Welcome all SGSII-Skyrocket owners (and anyone else)!
My purpose is to help organize some general info, root methods, kernels, and (constantly updated) ROMs into one thread with links. I do not take credit for ANY work posted in this thread as they should be given to their respective creators (and porters). Also, I am not responsible for any action(s)/damages you take that are from flashing or changing your device from the way you received it when it was purchased. So basically what you do with the information you find here is on YOU!
I hope that ALL questions and requests related to linked content will be posted in the appropriately linked thread(s). Hopefully, we can keep this organized and easy to read and update. Any dates are in a "MM.DD" format and are derived from the most recent date the OP of each thread was updated (in a subtle attempt to continue having devs update their OP any time they update their creations...though our devs seem to be cooler and smarter than the rest IMO ).
[General Information]
(Here will be info and links to info that can be considered useful to all users of the Skyrocket whether they decide to root/rom their devices or not.)
NEW: AGPS Patch Galaxy S II 3.1 & 2.2 | GET BACK TO RAPID GPS LOCK, CAN LOCK MORE SATS A few members are reporting great results with this. Please read directions fully on the subject thread!
All in One guide This is a great thread by AppDroid (thanks!) with multiple posts on different subjects (terms, flashing, rooting, etc) if you're new to customizing your phone I suggest you give it a look.
Odin: Return to Stock, fix soft brick ...for those who are in this situation
[Dev]SC-03D_DCM_SC03DOMKK3_SC03DDCMKK3...this is the official stock rom for the Japan NTT DoCoMo Galaxy S II LTE.
"Donation Rotation" Thread Now closed! xboarder56 now has a Skyrocket! Thanks to all who helped!
[Rooting Methods]
(This section will link to known and WORKING ways to root your Skyrocket.)
ROOT | CWM | ODIN | SGH-I727 and SGH-I727R Skyrocket ...This is the method I used to root my Skyrocket.
ROOT [ACS] Skyrocket Easy Root - Windows/Mac/Linux
SuperOneClick v2.3.1 (using zergRush) ...a "SUPER" easy way to root (thanks kornklown69 for bringing this up!)
S2 Root v1.5.1 - One Click Root and UnRoot solution for ALL SAMSUNG Devices Was posted in the SGSII forum but says it's for all Samsung androids...the reason I posted this one is because it's supposed to be able to unroot, please post below if you have successfully got this to work! Thanks!
[Kernels]
(This will link to any kernels that are created/being worked on for the Skyrocket.)
Skyrocket[2.6.35.14](v0.0.8)OC~1.73GHz/GPU OC/OTG/UV/SLQB/BLN 01.10
AT&T/Rogers dag .42 1.83GHzOC/UV/init.d/BFQ/BLN/FUSE/adb root/optimized 12.23
Cyanogenmod Skyrocket Kernel 0.43pre v4 12.19
AT&T Stock-ish 0.1 BLN/USB-OTG/NFS/FUSE/init.d/adb root/boot animation 12.07
i727 stock kernel odin 11.10
[Radios/baseband]
By a valid request this section includes links to radios for the Skyrocket. Since the homie twopumpchump has made a thread dedicated to this I will link to that thread.
Skyrocket Radio Thread maintained by TwoPumpChump
[ROMs]
(With our Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket gaining more attention and ownership, I expect our current developers...THANK YOU!!!!...to gain some new developers that will add to the growing list of available ROMs. There are other ROMs out there (not many) but I didn't want to post links to other forum sites. So instead, I will say this is not a complete list of available ROMs but it is all of them available on the XDA Developers SGSII Skyrocket Forums. NO links will go directly to the downloads, instead they will link to the threads. This will hopefully force people to see any instructions and warnings that are related to those ROMs directly from their creators.)
dsixda's Android Kitchen - Now supports SGS2 Skyrocket! Thanks to dsixda!!! This is a guide for understanding and assisting building ROMs.
MiUI Rom thread OP clearly states that this is a work in progress...only here for us to keep track of it's development
---
Sky Ice Cream Sandwich (2.3.5-ice-creamsandwich) Multiple Flavors 02.05!!
[ROM]CyanoTouchwiz Rocket --- Cm7base ICS theme 02.03!!
[ROM] DJ ICS V1.0.3 & ICS+ V1.0.3 [Sky Ice + ICS Perfection] 02.02
[ROM]UXKJ7.Cobra-beta 02.02
[ROM][UXKJ2]Buoyancy v1.3.1||Rogers/AT&T| 02.02
[UCKJ2] // NeXusM0D Version 2.0 // [AOSP Like] 01.28
[UXKJ2] // NeXuSM0D UX Version 3.4 // [AOSP Like] 01.28
SKYCoca Cola Classic (The Speedier Freak) 01.26
Alien ★ Build #5.5 ★ 01.24
Venom Stock Rc9.8 01.24
[2.3.6] Super Stock (AT&T Skyrocket) 12.27
{KK1 At&t}Red Sonja|*BETA*| TheCollective Custom Build 12.23
Space Pirate 1.0 RC1 {2.3.5 - KJ7} 12.20
CyanogenMod 7.2.0 Alpha Version 4 12.19
UXKJ7|CWM|AT&T/ROGERS|DEB&DEO|NOCIQ SkyROCKeteer 2.0 Beta 1*ICON FIX 12.08
TPC v3 2.3.5 | Da_G OC Kernel | IMG Flash | ATT | Rogers 12.08
QuikWiz v1.0.3||Overclock||CRT||Xloud||Bravia||2.3.5||Ciq free||Fast||248mb 12.04
Stock 2.3.6 rooted flashable zip 11.30
SGH-I727R_RWC_I727RUXKJ7_I727RRWCKJ7_I727RUXKJ7 11.30 ...official ROGERS stock ROM for SGH-i727R
Rogers/AT&T|CWM|BONESTOCK|DEBLOATED|DEODEXED| BoneSTOCKeteer 11.26
ADT Stock AT&T Rooted Base 11.10
I727UCKJ2 [Android 2.3.5] 10.15 ...this is a stock AT&T ROM
Stock Recovery.tar for I727UCKJ2 11.25 ...found this in the general section
I'm still working on this but will be open to suggestions on how to keep this organized and up-to-date (eventually I'll streamline it down a bit and remove my side comments). PLEASE try and keep comments in this thread related to making it better, helping me/us keep it updated, and also links to any findings that aren't included. Finally, anyone who either wishes to have their content posted here, updated, or removed from here please PM me and I'll do my best to get it sorted out. Thanks!
Reserved...
if its 2.3.5 i think the easiest root is superoneclick root way easier than ones listed
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
kornklown69 said:
if its 2.3.5 i think the easiest root is superoneclick root way easier than ones listed
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Linky? I'll throw it up there too! I admit I looked around for it on here but maybe I gave up too soon lol. Thanks kornklown69!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=803682
its not listed as a device but works beautifully using the zergrush exploit
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Ditto i've never used the other method of rooting. BUT superoneclick is SUPER easy
Sent from my SGH-I727R
This is a good idea and thanks... but it doesn't belong in the Development section.
cue_32 said:
This is a good idea and thanks... but it doesn't belong in the Development section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your input. Where do you think it should be? All the linked threads (besides one) are located within the Development section so imo a compilation (or index if you will) should be in the dev section too and at the top. Also, this isn't the first thread of it's kind. I'm sure you've seen a thread like this in each of the dev forums just to bring some kind of organization to the many roms and dev related convos/discussions.
If there is a better place for it to be then run it by the Moderators and see what they think.
PLEASE try and keep comments in this thread related to making it better, helping me/us keep it updated, and also links to any findings that aren't included
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have a good weekend!
Thank you for starting this. I think this does belong in the Development forum and should be stickied once it gets where it needs to be.
Anywho, my suggestion is to add a section for CWM-flashable modems. There are only a couple of baseband versions out now but I'm sure that as time goes on and more updates/leaks come out that people will want the ability to use the one they want with whatever rom.
Ok I'll take a look for the threads when I get off work and add them ...or you could be a pal and PM me the links so I can add them easily. Thanks for your help and opinion!
I will keep this in the development section. Looks like some useful information pertaining to development. Guides are allowed if they are kept up to date
Sent from the MIUI powered E3D
Should we organize the roms by date updated (most recent placed at top of that section) or should we organize it by ciq/no ciq? I'm currently leaning towards by date but it's a valid question.
InSaiyanone said:
Should we organize the roms by date updated (most recent placed at top of that section) or should we organize it by ciq/no ciq? I'm currently leaning towards by date but it's a valid question.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should organize them by date.
kornklown69 said:
if its 2.3.5 i think the easiest root is superoneclick root...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So is this only for 2.3.5? I want to make that clear up above since the original thread doesn't list our device (yet, I PM'd) or what it is working on.
InSaiyanone said:
Thanks for your input. Where do you think it should be? All the linked threads (besides one) are located within the Development section so imo a compilation (or index if you will) should be in the dev section too and at the top. Also, this isn't the first thread of it's kind. I'm sure you've seen a thread like this in each of the dev forums just to bring some kind of organization to the many roms and dev related convos/discussions.
If there is a better place for it to be then run it by the Moderators and see what they think.
Have a good weekend!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just saying...
Seen these threads made before (i.e. GSII i-9100) and the usual rules of [Dev] section is "If you didn't build it yourself, it doesn't belong in the Dev section." Since this is more a [Ref]erence... then....
but its always up to the moderator.
Either way, this is a useful thread
Lets keep this one here, it will hopefully stop some usual questions and give some answers
Yeah I got u cue, I really wanted to plan ahead for this forum and help out the Mods to keep it structured.
Again, if you see anything I can add to this please post or pm me. Also, maybe a message to some of the devs that haven't posted their roms here might be good idea to encourage them to create a thread here on XDA and show that we're being pretty pro-active on making the most out of our awesome device. Thoughts on that?
Please put in chronological order from most recently updated to oldest updated.
DANIEL133337 said:
Please put in chronological order from most recently updated to oldest updated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought the dates after each one would be enough considering the way us programmers are. A dev could revise a rom multiple times in one day, and I go off the date the OP is updated. But, if y'all really want that then um...ok. Anyone else agree with Dan?
Good thing. Maybe you can add links for stock kernel and rom for both Roger and AT&T.
thanks
hi Im new user of XDA. i tried to install ardatdat ICS kernel 4.0. after flash the kernel in CWM and reboot, the phone does not switch on. Its hang at opening "Samsung Galaxy R GT-I9103". kindly help me to solve this problem
NewbieGalaxyR said:
hi Im new user of XDA. i tried to install ardatdat ICS kernel 4.0. after flash the kernel in CWM and reboot, the phone does not switch on. Its hang at opening "Samsung Galaxy R GT-I9103". kindly help me to solve this problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you taken CWM backup before flashing Ardatdat's kernel...
Hope you have flashed it on ICS only..
mj.vikram said:
Have you taken CWM backup before flashing Ardatdat's kernel...
Hope you have flashed it on ICS only..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NewbieGalaxyR said:
hi Im new user of XDA. i tried to install ardatdat ICS kernel 4.0. after flash the kernel in CWM and reboot, the phone does not switch on. Its hang at opening "Samsung Galaxy R GT-I9103". kindly help me to solve this problem
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey MJ, I think this can be discussed over ardatdat thread.. @NewbieGalaxyR: buddy you can ask whatever problem is coming to your device due to Devs development. so please ask to Ardatdat thread for kernel.
Reported to Justin for this thread.
First of all this issues should be posted to kernel thread there is no need to create whole new topic for just a single issue.
Btw have u wiped data from CWM before flashing ardatdat kernel?
Try to boot in recovery mod if u r unable to boot in recovery than there are chances that its a brick.
If ur phone is booting in recovery mod than DONT RESTORE CWM BACKUP. U are having stock kernel and restoring nand backup is dangerous.
I suggest to donwload official ICS (from sammobile, see dev section for links) and flash it through Odin, than flash CWM and flash ardatdat kernel it will work fine.
Sent from my Galaxy Royale using Tapatalk 2.
xlm13x said:
First of all this issues should be posted to kernel thread there is no need to create whole new topic for just a single issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he is new user so he can not post it in Dev section, so he have posted it here....
mj.vikram said:
I think he is new user so he can not post it in Dev section, so he have posted it here....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice Catch MJ..
mj.vikram said:
I think he is new user so he can not post it in Dev section, so he have posted it here....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are lot of threads regarding these that how to be new user and not a noob. (like one made by mf in my sig) also we have sticky made by cooleagle regarding where to post. New users should read it first before posting.
Sent from my Galaxy Royale using Tapatalk 2.
This is okay guys. I'm happy with either:
a) a thread in General asking the question; or
b) a post in the respective thread.
In my ideal world, the kernel thread itself would contain nothing but the initial release and changelogs, and be closed after two posts (meaning people could only 'thank' the release, not post their thanks). All other discussion/praise/moaning/bug reports would be in a kernel Q&A thread in here, with one for each kernel/ROM available.
So I don't really mind seeing new topics for questions, so long as they are questions which haven't been answered time-and-time again.
Thanks for the heads-up and diligence though, I appreciate it greatly
Justin
Thank you Justin the way you are handling this Forum is really great....
@NewbieGalaxyR please make sure from next time you follow the XDA Rules...
juzz86 said:
This is okay guys. I'm happy with either:
a) a thread in General asking the question; or
b) a post in the respective thread.
In my ideal world, the kernel thread itself would contain nothing but the initial release and changelogs, and be closed after two posts (meaning people could only 'thank' the release, not post their thanks). All other discussion/praise/moaning/bug reports would be in a kernel Q&A thread in here, with one for each kernel/ROM available.
So I don't really mind seeing new topics for questions, so long as they are questions which haven't been answered time-and-time again.
Thanks for the heads-up and diligence though, I appreciate it greatly
Justin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can we have now have a Q&A section...?
because with the release of ICS, there would be definitely a lot of newbies and ppl who would ask such Quest..
hope you understand...!!
Deeply thanks everyone for answering questions for me.
I do not always have time to keep refreshing the forum, but I will not hesitate to answer any questions within my knowledge
ardatdat said:
Deeply thanks everyone for answering questions for me.
I do not always have time to keep refreshing the forum, but I will not hesitate to answer any questions within my knowledge
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U just keep deving. there are many helpful users in our forum who can shootout problems.
U have very busy job yet u manage to dev our device is really a great contribution from ur side. :thumbup:
Sent from my Galaxy Royale using Tapatalk 2.
xlm13x said:
U just keep deving. there are many helpful users in our forum who can shootout problems.
U have very busy job yet u manage to dev our device is really a great contribution from ur side. :thumbup:
Sent from my Galaxy Royale using Tapatalk 2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks mate, you are the one who understand me :good:
So i've been trying to enabling the navigationbar on MIUI, after briefly using the AOKP rom and finding this topic soon after. Think it would be great to use as the touch-button-issue is driving me nuts sometimes.
I've already decompiled the framework-res.apk, made the changes as described here, rebuild it, signed it and then flashed it.
My device boots up fine, just doesn't show the navigationbar. So I was wondering if someone could tell me what i'm doing wrong?
Here's the link for the framework-res.apk i've edited & the CWM update-zip, the version I've used is from MIUI 2.9.29 (from miuiandroid.com)
Probably others out there that would use this I think
I would just like to thank you for not creating this topic in the Development section.
Hgaara said:
I would just like to thank you for not creating this topic in the Development section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that a sarcastic thx? Seemed more appropriate here then in dev or Q&A, don't shoot me if I thought wrong
rousseauxy said:
Is that a sarcastic thx? Seemed more appropriate here then in dev or Q&A, don't shoot me if I thought wrong
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Far from it. Most n00bs would of posted it in the dev section
See the original thread and make comments there, it's alot easier to maintain one thread.
Flashed Bootanimation4U.zip on "Redemption v3.1" Rom and work.
I see now the Redemption Bootanimation.
Thanks
EDIT: Posted also on NOTE 2 Thread.
Please refer here
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1790
Thread closed
Could some please upload thair deodex rom for us noobies who can't do it them self
1. Why are you openind new thread if we have Q&A Thread?
2,. Use Search option. We have planety of deodexed roms here.
1. I have asked my post was ignored...
2. JB rom not GB rom
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda app-developers app
1. No ... you did not asked according to your post history:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/search.php?searchid=140664665
2. In this:
bogii4 said:
Could some please upload thair deodex rom for us noobies who can't do it them self
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where did you put information that it is JB related question?
PLEASE USE SEARCH FUNCTION
arroyo said:
1. No ... you did not asked according to your post history:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/search.php?searchid=140664665
2. In this:
Where did you put information that it is JB related question?
PLEASE USE SEARCH FUNCTION
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1st, I understood in the first second that he meant JB and not GB. Why? Because no matter how "noob" a person can be about roms he wouldn't ask for a deodexed rom is he didn't know that most custom roms are already deodexed, so he would notice.
2nd I agree that wether you understand it or not he sould have mentioned it but well...be a little more "noob"-friendly, after all if you would ask wither is or GB or JB it would give you 1 extra post
Thread closed.. OP please search more before posting such nonsense