Are there any ROM using the latest IMM76L binaries provided in July 4th for the NS4G? I'm noticing the binaries were released on July 4th but there were ROM out there like BuglessBeast that had the IMM76L build for the NS4G before the binaries were released. Are these ROM using the IMM76D binaries even though the actual AOSP build is 4.0.4 IML76L?
I don't think the changes are applied to us. Google search seems to bring up the Xoom every hit on the front page.
Sent by pocket technology.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/android-building/B-stKwRzy1Q/B-Mu04oIf-YJ
No biggie.
Related
Hi,
I have the i9020T Nexus S (the first one that came out) and I am running a KANG of CyanogenMod 7.1 - GRJ22. I'm on baseband XXKB1 and I want to update to the latest one as I'm having network problems on this one. Where can I get latest baseband?
Are you looking for XXKD1?
If so here http://db.tt/GkXbkIW
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Thank you for that! I hope it is the latest one which works with 2.3.4.
yeah guys source code for ICS was released today. to bad we dont have a lot of developers and thanks to the ones who stayed with us.
And you cant post this in one of the many threads open for this exact same reason?????
fcisco13 said:
And you cant post this in one of the many threads open for this exact same reason?????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. Apparently He/She is a special snowflake
Thanks for the info but we will add this thread to the previous 30 threads about ICS.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA App
I wish I was a special snow flake...
Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio using XDA App
This is so tiring. Another thread about worthless source code. Source code without drivers compiled for our device against ICS is worthless. Devs cannot build an ICS build that will be stable without specific drivers built for iCS and the new kernel. Until LG releases or at least leaks an ICS build for our phone, we are not going to get a stable ICS rom, despite their being AOSP source code.
jboxer said:
This is so tiring. Another thread about worthless source code. Source code without drivers compiled for our device against ICS is worthless. Devs cannot build an ICS build that will be stable without specific drivers built for iCS and the new kernel. Until LG releases or at least leaks an ICS build for our phone, we are not going to get a stable ICS rom, despite their being AOSP source code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i never said anything about the devs to start making rom didnt i???? now that source code is release brands like lg will start working on then since they said they would. i know htc said that ics will come to my sensation earlier 2012
and even though developers make an ics rom without the manufacture release its versio it would not work correctly because of the drivers. it will have problems with gps etc etc
jboxer said:
This is so tiring. Another thread about worthless source code. Source code without drivers compiled for our device against ICS is worthless. Devs cannot build an ICS build that will be stable without specific drivers built for iCS and the new kernel. Until LG releases or at least leaks an ICS build for our phone, we are not going to get a stable ICS rom, despite their being AOSP source code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Release of ICS source code is still an important development for community rom development.
We can still get a stable build by compiling ICS against Gingerbread kernel.
We have fully working drivers for Gingerbread kernel.
Yes but the cookie in Ice Cream Sandwich is not Gingerbread.
raddy said:
Release of ICS source code is still an important development for community rom development.
We can still get a stable build by compiling ICS against Gingerbread kernel.
We have fully working drivers for Gingerbread kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really hope you're right. My only concern before getting this phone was that of NVIDIA providing the devs with the drivers that we need for further Android updates.
Ice Cream Sandwhich AOSP source code has been released since late last year, I am just curious as to why the Skyrocket doesnt have a working ICS custom rom as yet.
I am a noob, but I notice many other phones have alpha builds and/or beta builds while all we have( much credit to its developers) are themed roms that look like ICS
Why is this?
ICS source code does NOT equal Samsung Kernel Source code....
you must have all the proprietary bits and blobs in order for it to work....
Drivers for the device. There has been plenty-o-talk about the subject. Samy has to release the source ICS kernel with the ICS drivers.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
I'm not understanding Tjisana's question given that people like seanzscreams' have produced the Sky ICS ROM.
Is that not what he's after?
That rom is ICS themed. It is ICS in appearance only. Still a great rom but doesn't bring the features and additions that a true ICS rom will bring
Sent via smoke signal
Ah - got it. Shows you what little I know. That explains why the version number is still 2.3.6 and not 4.0.
Thanks for the quick update.
X10D3 said:
Drivers for the device. There has been plenty-o-talk about the subject. Samy has to release the source ICS kernel with the ICS drivers.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info
Appreciate it
I've heard the CM 9.0 is released. But when I go to the CM website for download, I'm disappointed, I only found the CM7.x even in nightlybuild.
HTC has released out the 4.0 for Desire S，why CM still build the 7.x?Does anyone of CM maintained the rom for Saga?
CM9.0 has not yet been released and is considered in alpha state. The reason is that devs are waiting for official HTC kernel 3.0 sources to build betas (and releases). At the moment, only workarounds have been developped to use old kernel.
Moreover, devs have already moved to CM10 (jelly-bean based builds) but still, without kernel sources, ROM is stable but not enough to be considered final.
ICS is not officially released. There is no kernel source, therefore no support (for now) for our device. We have to wait for HTC and then guys from CM could add us to supported devices.
Sent from my HTC Desire S using xda app-developers app
CM9 will not have any updates.
The focus has shifted to CM10.
When kernel sources are out, and the kernel work will be done for JellyBean (CM10).
Tapatalked from a Desire S with Kernel 3 built from One V sources. Take that HTC!!!!!!
HTC haven't released ICS for the HTC Desire S, they have pushed back the ETA for the update to sometime during August. It could take a further month for them to release the Kernel source code which prevented our device from getting a stable release of CM9.
There is a petition you can sign which is trying to get HTC to release their source code a lot quicker.
The latest CM9 build by Nexx is fairly stable. I use it daily and haven't changed since first putting it on my device. It does reboot now and again and is sometimes slow at locking/unlocking but there have been no major issues and it is much better than running the stock ROM from HTC.
I don't understand why HTC release the source for newer devices, but don't for the others, the older ones.
Because newer devices are considered more important to upgrade, hence the code released soon after the upgrade...
For older phones, the code has been released but for the 2.6 kernel, not the 3.0 required by ICS and above. Currently, HTC has said that they are testing the new kernel and libraries for stable and improved user-experience... so we have to wait even if we use custom ROMs...
I was using a March 3 stable release of CM10.1 for the Verizon Galaxy S3 and the cyanogenmod kernel, everything was working fine. I was using leankernel on a different build of CM, so I got an updated version of leankernel and made sure it was compatible with my version of CM. I flashed the kernel in CWM, made sure to clear the cache/dalvik and now boots, shows the Galaxy S3 logo for a split second, then the screen turns black and cannot do anything. Any help? I am pretty sure I was rooted considering I could give root access to applications, and it would appear under the superuser in the Settings.
What date is your current rom from? LK 5.5.5 should only boot on AOSP roms dated April 19th or newer.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
SlimSnoopOS said:
What date is your current rom from? LK 5.5.5 should only boot on AOSP roms dated April 19th or newer.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Current ROM is from March 3rd, I believe. I know it's from March. Is there a leankernel version that would work with a March 3rd release of CM?
Syflox said:
Current ROM is from March 3rd, I believe. I know it's from March. Is there a leankernel version that would work with a March 3rd release of CM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm fairly certain AOSP roms from March 3rd are Linux 3.0 based. Which means you can only use AOSP LK 2.8 and LK 2.9. I don't run AOSP roms but I keep up with the AOSP kernel threads a good bit just for knowledge purposes.
I said this once but it needs repeating in a different manner. Imo isn't continuing work on Linux 3.0 kernels so you'll remain on that setup until you update your rom to one of the latest builds.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda app-developers app
I just flashed LK 2.8, booted up fine, thanks! Here's the leankernel builds for anyone who has the same problem as me http://imoseyon.host4droid.com/s3/aosp/#!/view=details/lang=en/sort=da