Database Info

[Q] HTC wildfire vs samsung galaxy 3?

Ok guys,i have been arguing with my brother who has a better phone,my galaxy 3 versus his wildfire.ive done some researching,and where i find it my phone is better. Here are some specs
Galaxy 3:
CPU:Samsung S5P6422 667 MHz
GPU:FM3DSE-its apparently some samsung's low gpu,but our galaxy 3 devs are working on it to make it better
RAM-256 mb
Multitouch-yes,even 10 point on cyanogenmod firmwares
Overclock-up to 1.4 ghz,1.2/1.3 stable
Wildfire:
CPU-528 arm11
GPU-no gpu
Multitouch-yes
Overclock-i dont know.
Someone please provide me some more wildfire specs so we can make a better comparsion
Sent from my GT-I5800 using xda premium

Dual-core Samsung GalaxyAce 2 goes on pre-order inthe UK

www.unwiredview.com/2012/03/12/dual...er-in-the-uk-for-249-98-shipping-on-april-23/

I'm really excited for its launch here in Brazil. It should be coming really soon (first quarter, or so the rumors says).
I will keep the business in the family

ME WANTZ ACE 2
Herpderp Defy.

Need to save money for it

No idea when it will come in India.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium

What are it's nearest competitors (when considering price range - processor power)

Bakuron said:
What are it's nearest competitors (when considering price range - processor power)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy R (Dual-core 1Ghz ARM-Cortex A8/9 with Tegra 2)
LG Optimus 2x (This one is obvious)
Motorola Defy (I think it's not sold anymore - TI OMAP 3630 Dual-core 800Mhz with PowerVR SGX530)
Galaxy S Advance (Not very sure about phone specs)
Nokia Lumia 808 Pureview (Don't get me started)
Herpderp Defy.

Thanks man. Had a quick look at your suggestions:
R is bigger (i personally find Ace size optimal for a phone rather than PDA) and more expensive (another £60), so the Ace2 = more bang for buck.
Optimus, very similar, better spec(?) - dislike the 4 hardbuttons layout.
S Advance appears to have 1ghz dual core. But at this stage looks like a 295£ phone.
Wouldn't touch a Nokia smartphone.
Ace 2 it is then!

The new acepta Its really Cool !! ;D
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA

Bakuron said:
Thanks man. Had a quick look at your suggestions:
R is bigger (i personally find Ace size optimal for a phone rather than PDA) and more expensive (another £60), so the Ace2 = more bang for buck.
Optimus, very similar, better spec(?) - dislike the 4 hardbuttons layout.
S Advance appears to have 1ghz dual core. But at this stage looks like a 295£ phone.
Wouldn't touch a Nokia smartphone.
Ace 2 it is then!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 2x is almost similar to the R , with Tegra 2 as well
Herpderp Defy.

More suggestions:
Samsung Galaxy W (Probably a smaller version of Note)
Galaxy Note (Quite huge)
Galaxy SII (everyone's favourite)
Galaxy Ace Plus (LOL it's not that bad)
HTC Sensation XE/XL (XE = beats , XL = bigger screen)
HTC Edge (is it out yet ? Lol)
Motorola Defy+ (An upgraded version of my phone)
The badass Xiaomi phone (LOL)
Samsung Focus S (WP7 variant of SII)
Herpderp Defy.

Note really is massive.
W is a good equivalent, but prefer dual-core.
Sensation is another 100£ more. S II another 200£
Edge seemingly not available yet.
Xiaomi doesn't look too bad at all!!! - http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/27/xiaomi-phone-review/
Defy+ 4 buttons, sorry just not for me.
Ace + should be Ace pointless.
Focus S is a Windows phone...aka yuck.

Sony solo. 3.7 bravia screen. 1ghz dual core. 5mp camera. Floating touch (just move your finger over the screen). Will get ics.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium

Kepas said:
Sony solo. 3.7 bravia screen. 1ghz dual core. 5mp camera. Floating touch (just move your finger over the screen). Will get ics.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Solo or Sola? http://mobilesyrup.com/2012/03/13/sony-makes-the-xperia-sola-official/
1gig dual-core with a 1350mah battery sounds...interesting.

And guess what....this is a succesor season.S2 gets a successor--The samsung Galaxy S3...behold.The 1.8 Ghz Quad core processor phone...Now available as pre-order:
The Galaxy S III will come with a 4.6-inch Super AMOLED Plus touchscreen with a resolution of 720 x 1280. This means a ‘retina’ quality pixel density of 319ppi.Specifications include an Exynos 4212 quad-core 1.8GHz processor, 2GB RAM, 16GB of internal storage, a 12MP rear facing camera, a 2MP front facing camera and 4G LTE connectivity.It will also have version 4.0 of Samsung’s TouchWiz interface and we understand that it will run Google Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich.

My ACE is better than all phones
Other phones sucks! GO AHEAD GALAXY ACE!

Samsung S Advance VS. Galaxy Ace 2

Hello,
I'm just figuring out which one is better in specs?
Thanks

A comparison between the two
^^^
Above is a spec by spec comparison of the two devices. they are both extremely similar but the Advanced usually seems to have a minor bump over the Ace. Though the Aces lower specs ( slower clock speed) may help improve battery life

justme8282 said:
Hello,
I'm just figuring out which one is better in specs?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy s advanced Win

Samsung Galaxy S Advance..
I have waited for years but Galaxy Ace 2 released in my country and then I realized S Advance have better performance with similar price..

samsung galaxy S advance for sure

Galaxy S Advence is better than Ace 2.

Don't they both have dual core chips? Or is it only the Ace 2?
Sent from my GT-P1000 using xda premium

olyloh6696 said:
Don't they both have dual core chips? Or is it only the Ace 2?
Sent from my GT-P1000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
both have a dual core but ace 2 is 800 MHz dual core but s advance has bigger screen size and 1ghz dual core cortex a9. and s advance are not very expensive in our country

Galaxy S Advance
I would go for the Galaxy S Advance due to the better storage options.

I would also prefer the Galaxy S Advance.

the Galaxy S Advance win, 4"screen size+AMOLED :good:
i heard a lot positive comments from camera section too

The original S is already better than the ace 2 so you can throw your money now
Swyped from my GT-i9100

Gorjess said:
The original S is already better than the ace 2 so you can throw your money now
Swyped from my GT-i9100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy S Advance.. : D

I have an ACE 2 because S Advance wasn't available on my country yet. Both phones can be clocked to 1.2 GHz. S Advance should have Super AMOLED Plus

Had the same dillema and I've chosen the S Advance, becouse of:
1. Faster processor clock
2. Better screen
3. Larger storage
4. Awsome design

I'm happy my s advance is awesome the screen is beautiful the sound is good and the cam is between regular and good my verdict for all including $$$ is **** (four stars)
Enviado desde mi LG-P970 usando Tapatalk 2

Galaxy S Advance Screen - Speaker - and Plastic quality is better than Galaxy Ace 2..
And S Advance corning gorilla glass.. Super Amoled
Galaxy Ace 2 PLS LCD
But Ace 2 Smaller - also screen is smaller and same processor but works 800 mhz so battery life will be much much better.

Are the better features of the Galaxy S Advance worth the doubling of price over the Ace 2?

Why 1.4ghz?

I'm just wondering why samsung uses 1.4ghz on the note 10.1 while the smaller phablet note2 uses a faster 1.6ghz. It make more sense to use a faster SOC on the tablet than on a phone.

Since Note 10.1 came out first, do you think got people willing to buy Note 2 (N7100), if the Note 10.1 is using 1.6 GHz and the Note 2 using 1.4 GHz ???
With all the new features in 10.1", I think samsung itself still confident to sell this Note 10.1" under 1.4GHz processor. The features is the selling point of this Note 10.1".
And if I'm not wrong, Note 2 will have the similar features with Note 10.1". Differences only on the processor, screen (which is AMOLED), and the Jellybean. So, that one will be the selling point from Note 2 again.
And don't forget, the launching within these 2 devices is very close. And I don't think Note 10.1" will get Jellybean until the Note 2 is released on the market.
:fingers-crossed:

mywingtophone said:
I'm just wondering why samsung uses 1.4ghz on the note 10.1 while the smaller phablet note2 uses a faster 1.6ghz. It make more sense to use a faster SOC on the tablet than on a phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because the Note 2 is getting released 2-3 months later than the 10.1, which gives Samsung time to get their chip production line ramped up enough to reliably produce 1.6 GHz chips?

does the note 2 and the 10.1 not have the same processor only the note 2 is clocked higher?

cyb3r5c4r said:
does the note 2 and the 10.1 not have the same processor only the note 2 is clocked higher?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They do I believe, just one is a little higher.

davidrules7778 said:
They do I believe, just one is a little higher.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, just like the original Note - same CPU as GS2 except clocked 200 MHz higher. (Which shouldn't be difficult when you release the device 6+ months after the first device with the same CPU.)

if they hava same processor, i think v might ovrrclock to 1.6ghz as well

I already oc my note to 1600Mhz. Running smooth without problems.
Infact I didnt have to raise the voltage and the 1600Mhz was already set in the kernel.
I just unlocked the 1400 settings.
Sent from my GT-N8000 using XDA Premium HD app

i dont understand the issue here..
its the fastest machine on the market.

ngocdao said:
i dont understand the issue here..
its the fastest machine on the market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think its an issue really just explaining that all samsumg mobile quad core devices(note 10.1, note 2, SGS3) are using the same cpu and could all be potentially clocked to 1.6GHz

[Q] HELP Deciding Galaxy S2 i727 Skyrocket vs. Galaxy S2 i777

Hello guys, so I recently sold my Atrix 4G and have been on the dilemma on which phone to get... I am currently looking at these 2 models:
Galaxy S2 Skyrocket (i727) | (Qualcomm MSM8260 Snapdragon - Dual-core 1.5 GHz Scorpion - Adreno 220)
Galaxy S2 (i777) | (Exynos C210 - Dual-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A9 - Mali-400MP)
From what I have read seems like the i777 features the best performance CPU/GPU compared to the i727 but I would like to know by what margin, will it be noticeable? (Performance is very important for my occasional gaming).
Also I like my phones to be backed by the community with lots of rom's to choose from (CM10 is a must for me) and from the 2 I'd like to know which is the most future proof and offers the biggest developer crowd? NFC Support is a must!
Other opinions are welcome!
Also on a side note should I just fork the extra bucks and get a Gnex? I like the community support offered for it but the camera and lack of external Sd-Card just doest cut it for me. Also how does the CPU/GPU of this one compares to the skyrocket?
Thanks!
Oscar

wceoscar said:
Hello guys, so I recently sold my Atrix 4G and have been on the dilemma on which phone to get... I am currently looking at these 2 models:
Galaxy S2 Skyrocket (i727) | (Qualcomm MSM8260 Snapdragon - Dual-core 1.5 GHz Scorpion - Adreno 220)
Galaxy S2 (i777) | (Exynos C210 - Dual-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A9 - Mali-400MP)
From what I have read seems like the i777 features the best performance CPU/GPU compared to the i727 but I would like to know by what margin, will it be noticeable? (Performance is very important for my occasional gaming).
Also I like my phones to be backed by the community with lots of rom's to choose from (CM10 is a must for me) and from the 2 I'd like to know which is the most future proof and offers the biggest developer crowd? NFC Support is a must!
Other opinions are welcome!
Also on a side note should I just fork the extra bucks and get a Gnex? I like the community support offered for it but the camera and lack of external Sd-Card just doest cut it for me. Also how does the CPU/GPU of this one compares to the skyrocket?
Thanks!
Oscar
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. The Exynos dual SCREAMS, especially when compared to the Snapdragon S3. If the Skyrocket had a Snapdragon S4, then you'd have a decision, but trust me, after owning the Sprint GSII and the Evo 3D (Exynos and Snapdragon S3, respectively, I can tell you that for gaming and everyday performance, hands down the Exynos is the winner in every category. The Adreno GPU in the S3 is terrible for any high-end gaming (Grand Theft Auto 3, Dead Trigger, etc). I myself game heavily on my phone, and I'll tell you straight up, the Exynos dual very powerful and still very viable.
2. The Galaxy S II i777 has NFC, though no Secure Element. What does that mean? It means you can't use Google Wallet, but you can do pretty much anything else, like Android Beam and NFC Tag interaction.
3. The i777 is identical to the i9100P (i9100 with NFC), except for the button layout. You'll get much more support than with the Skyrocket.

wceoscar said:
Hello guys, so I recently sold my Atrix 4G and have been on the dilemma on which phone to get... I am currently looking at these 2 models:
Galaxy S2 Skyrocket (i727) | (Qualcomm MSM8260 Snapdragon - Dual-core 1.5 GHz Scorpion - Adreno 220)
Galaxy S2 (i777) | (Exynos C210 - Dual-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A9 - Mali-400MP)
From what I have read seems like the i777 features the best performance CPU/GPU compared to the i727 but I would like to know by what margin, will it be noticeable? (Performance is very important for my occasional gaming).
Also I like my phones to be backed by the community with lots of rom's to choose from (CM10 is a must for me) and from the 2 I'd like to know which is the most future proof and offers the biggest developer crowd? NFC Support is a must!
Other opinions are welcome!
Also on a side note should I just fork the extra bucks and get a Gnex? I like the community support offered for it but the camera and lack of external Sd-Card just doest cut it for me. Also how does the CPU/GPU of this one compares to the skyrocket?
Thanks!
Oscar
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have owned the i777 and i loved it so i would recommend it

Product F(RED) said:
1. The Exynos dual SCREAMS, especially when compared to the Snapdragon S3. If the Skyrocket had a Snapdragon S4, then you'd have a decision, but trust me, after owning the Sprint GSII and the Evo 3D (Exynos and Snapdragon S3, respectively, I can tell you that for gaming and everyday performance, hands down the Exynos is the winner in every category. The Adreno GPU in the S3 is terrible for any high-end gaming (Grand Theft Auto 3, Dead Trigger, etc). I myself game heavily on my phone, and I'll tell you straight up, the Exynos dual very powerful and still very viable.
2. The Galaxy S II i777 has NFC, though no Secure Element. What does that mean? It means you can't use Google Wallet, but you can do pretty much anything else, like Android Beam and NFC Tag interaction.
3. The i777 is identical to the i9100P (i9100 with NFC), except for the button layout. You'll get much more support than with the Skyrocket.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the fast reply! Getting the i777

I727 Cuz bigger screen more MHz than i777 never tried gaming on i777
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using xda app-developers app

.2" is negligible in comparison and Exynos blows out the Snapdragon S3 CPU found in the slowrocket

my i777 lags playing MC4 Amazing spider man Dark knight rises Wild blood, why does it lag?

ian619420 said:
my i777 lags playing MC4 Amazing spider man Dark knight rises Wild blood, why does it lag?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's an older phone. That's how I'll summarize it. The chipset is fast but not fast enough to play the latest and greatest smoothly.
Sent from my Galaxy Note 2

Product F(RED) said:
It's an older phone. That's how I'll summarize it. The chipset is fast but not fast enough to play the latest and greatest smoothly.
Sent from my Galaxy Note 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would nook hd/ + handle those games? Since it does have a powervr sgx544 gpu?