Hello,
I'm just figuring out which one is better in specs?
Thanks
A comparison between the two
^^^
Above is a spec by spec comparison of the two devices. they are both extremely similar but the Advanced usually seems to have a minor bump over the Ace. Though the Aces lower specs ( slower clock speed) may help improve battery life
justme8282 said:
Hello,
I'm just figuring out which one is better in specs?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy s advanced Win
Samsung Galaxy S Advance..
I have waited for years but Galaxy Ace 2 released in my country and then I realized S Advance have better performance with similar price..
samsung galaxy S advance for sure
Galaxy S Advence is better than Ace 2.
Don't they both have dual core chips? Or is it only the Ace 2?
Sent from my GT-P1000 using xda premium
olyloh6696 said:
Don't they both have dual core chips? Or is it only the Ace 2?
Sent from my GT-P1000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
both have a dual core but ace 2 is 800 MHz dual core but s advance has bigger screen size and 1ghz dual core cortex a9. and s advance are not very expensive in our country
Galaxy S Advance
I would go for the Galaxy S Advance due to the better storage options.
I would also prefer the Galaxy S Advance.
the Galaxy S Advance win, 4"screen size+AMOLED :good:
i heard a lot positive comments from camera section too
The original S is already better than the ace 2 so you can throw your money now
Swyped from my GT-i9100
Gorjess said:
The original S is already better than the ace 2 so you can throw your money now
Swyped from my GT-i9100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy S Advance.. : D
I have an ACE 2 because S Advance wasn't available on my country yet. Both phones can be clocked to 1.2 GHz. S Advance should have Super AMOLED Plus
Had the same dillema and I've chosen the S Advance, becouse of:
1. Faster processor clock
2. Better screen
3. Larger storage
4. Awsome design
I'm happy my s advance is awesome the screen is beautiful the sound is good and the cam is between regular and good my verdict for all including $$$ is **** (four stars)
Enviado desde mi LG-P970 usando Tapatalk 2
Galaxy S Advance Screen - Speaker - and Plastic quality is better than Galaxy Ace 2..
And S Advance corning gorilla glass.. Super Amoled
Galaxy Ace 2 PLS LCD
But Ace 2 Smaller - also screen is smaller and same processor but works 800 mhz so battery life will be much much better.
Are the better features of the Galaxy S Advance worth the doubling of price over the Ace 2?
Related
Ok guys,i have been arguing with my brother who has a better phone,my galaxy 3 versus his wildfire.ive done some researching,and where i find it my phone is better. Here are some specs
Galaxy 3:
CPU:Samsung S5P6422 667 MHz
GPU:FM3DSE-its apparently some samsung's low gpu,but our galaxy 3 devs are working on it to make it better
RAM-256 mb
Multitouch-yes,even 10 point on cyanogenmod firmwares
Overclock-up to 1.4 ghz,1.2/1.3 stable
Wildfire:
CPU-528 arm11
GPU-no gpu
Multitouch-yes
Overclock-i dont know.
Someone please provide me some more wildfire specs so we can make a better comparsion
Sent from my GT-I5800 using xda premium
which is better ((galaxy S)) OR ((S plus)) OR ((SL)) ??
Just S.
Here are the specs:
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9000_galaxy_s-3115.php
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9001_galaxy_s_plus-3908.php
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9003_galaxy_sl-3761.php
It's up for you to decide
But in terms of active communities, I think Galaxy S take (i9000) takes the cake.
S i9000, It has more roms developed and more Cookers.
Galaxy s is far better than these phones
i9003 is the best.Probably en......I think so
Sent from my GT-I9003 using Tapatalk
the Important think in I9003 is that it has 487 MB OF RAM Vs 3xx for other s AND S+ and about Super clear LCD it lloks better in reality
slaid480 said:
the Important think in I9003 is that it has 487 MB OF RAM Vs 3xx for other s AND S+ and about Super clear LCD it lloks better in reality
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All the phones have 512MB but they have different reserved memory for video. That's why SL has more free memory (it has worse video card)
Sent from my GT-I9003
Galaxy S is the one best supported by developers here, but it's the most expensive one here in Italy, not as the latest phones obviously
falex007 said:
All the phones have 512MB but they have different reserved memory for video. That's why SL has more free memory (it has worse video card)
Sent from my GT-I9003
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're wrong Dude,Galaxy S I9000 has 512 of RAM 1xx of it ram is used by the emulator that's why It has 3xx o ram user avaible,But the our galaxy SL I9003 It has a 650 MB of RAM so 487 of RAM avaible for users
I have a sg sl and the original.
Gt i9003 is better than the original one because of the cpu is faster, battery life is better and camera quality and the gpu isn't that bad, I got 14.4 fps on nenamark2 faster than xperia play by 0.3 fps but the s has a better gpu so if you are a gamer, the S is better although I recommend paying little more to buy the galaxy R
Spec-wize S Plus beats them both but development-wise Galaxy S wins
slaid480 said:
You're wrong Dude,Galaxy S I9000 has 512 of RAM 1xx of it ram is used by the emulator that's why It has 3xx o ram user avaible,But the our galaxy SL I9003 It has a 650 MB of RAM so 487 of RAM avaible for users
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure? where did you find this info?
I see this:
http://archive.techtree.com/techtree/jsp/article.jsp?article_id=114781&cat_id=614&page=2
Both Samsung Galaxy S GT-I9000 and S LCD GT-I9003 have 512MB RAM but since the latter houses a different processor and GPU, the available RAM is more - 478MB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
BTW other "minus" of SL is Bluetooth. It has 2.1 version while S has 3.0
But for me SL was better because of sharpness and more realistic colors.
falex007 said:
Are you sure? where did you find this info?
I see this:
http://archive.techtree.com/techtree/jsp/article.jsp?article_id=114781&cat_id=614&page=2
BTW other "minus" of SL is Bluetooth. It has 2.1 version while S has 3.0
But for me SL was better because of sharpness and more realistic colors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
About what you said All Smasung 512MB RAM phones Got 3xx Like Galaxy W ,S Plus,ACE plus etc.....
i think I9000 (galaxy S) still have better overall performance than galaxy SL (I9003)...
falex007 said:
Are you sure? where did you find this info?
I see this:
http://archive.techtree.com/techtree/jsp/article.jsp?article_id=114781&cat_id=614&page=2
BTW other "minus" of SL is Bluetooth. It has 2.1 version while S has 3.0
But for me SL was better because of sharpness and more realistic colors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Falex Mate, where did you get this info about bluetooth . My packaging and the following link:http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9003_galaxy_sl-3761.php
Both state we have Bluetooth 3.0
Fell free to update my knowledge ,if I'm wrong.
S Plus but i have a sl
S = Better Display
SL = Better Processor
S PLUS = Better Display & Better Processor
it can be so easy
speedypoint said:
Falex Mate, where did you get this info about bluetooth . My packaging and the following link:http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9003_galaxy_sl-3761.php
Both state we have Bluetooth 3.0
Fell free to update my knowledge ,if I'm wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Over here I see different (v2.1) Also for my native language page I see v2.0 )))
OBviously SCL
In my opinion SCL is better phone than S because they made it after S. There are like 4 factors changing between both phones, like LCD screen.
SCL for eveR!!
Dragonety said:
In my opinion SCL is better phone than S because they made it after S. There are like 4 factors changing between both phones, like LCD screen.
SCL for eveR!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I was searching new phone for me (almost 1 year ago) it was 3 parameters of the selecting i9003:
1. I compared 2 phones and I liked more the sharpness of the LCD display and more natural colors.
2. The price of i9003 was lesser
3. In the shop with the best prices there wasn't i9000 and I should wait for a week or 2 to take it.
www.unwiredview.com/2012/03/12/dual...er-in-the-uk-for-249-98-shipping-on-april-23/
I'm really excited for its launch here in Brazil. It should be coming really soon (first quarter, or so the rumors says).
I will keep the business in the family
ME WANTZ ACE 2
Herpderp Defy.
Need to save money for it
No idea when it will come in India.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
What are it's nearest competitors (when considering price range - processor power)
Bakuron said:
What are it's nearest competitors (when considering price range - processor power)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy R (Dual-core 1Ghz ARM-Cortex A8/9 with Tegra 2)
LG Optimus 2x (This one is obvious)
Motorola Defy (I think it's not sold anymore - TI OMAP 3630 Dual-core 800Mhz with PowerVR SGX530)
Galaxy S Advance (Not very sure about phone specs)
Nokia Lumia 808 Pureview (Don't get me started)
Herpderp Defy.
Thanks man. Had a quick look at your suggestions:
R is bigger (i personally find Ace size optimal for a phone rather than PDA) and more expensive (another £60), so the Ace2 = more bang for buck.
Optimus, very similar, better spec(?) - dislike the 4 hardbuttons layout.
S Advance appears to have 1ghz dual core. But at this stage looks like a 295£ phone.
Wouldn't touch a Nokia smartphone.
Ace 2 it is then!
The new acepta Its really Cool !! ;D
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA
Bakuron said:
Thanks man. Had a quick look at your suggestions:
R is bigger (i personally find Ace size optimal for a phone rather than PDA) and more expensive (another £60), so the Ace2 = more bang for buck.
Optimus, very similar, better spec(?) - dislike the 4 hardbuttons layout.
S Advance appears to have 1ghz dual core. But at this stage looks like a 295£ phone.
Wouldn't touch a Nokia smartphone.
Ace 2 it is then!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 2x is almost similar to the R , with Tegra 2 as well
Herpderp Defy.
More suggestions:
Samsung Galaxy W (Probably a smaller version of Note)
Galaxy Note (Quite huge)
Galaxy SII (everyone's favourite)
Galaxy Ace Plus (LOL it's not that bad)
HTC Sensation XE/XL (XE = beats , XL = bigger screen)
HTC Edge (is it out yet ? Lol)
Motorola Defy+ (An upgraded version of my phone)
The badass Xiaomi phone (LOL)
Samsung Focus S (WP7 variant of SII)
Herpderp Defy.
Note really is massive.
W is a good equivalent, but prefer dual-core.
Sensation is another 100£ more. S II another 200£
Edge seemingly not available yet.
Xiaomi doesn't look too bad at all!!! - http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/27/xiaomi-phone-review/
Defy+ 4 buttons, sorry just not for me.
Ace + should be Ace pointless.
Focus S is a Windows phone...aka yuck.
Sony solo. 3.7 bravia screen. 1ghz dual core. 5mp camera. Floating touch (just move your finger over the screen). Will get ics.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Kepas said:
Sony solo. 3.7 bravia screen. 1ghz dual core. 5mp camera. Floating touch (just move your finger over the screen). Will get ics.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Solo or Sola? http://mobilesyrup.com/2012/03/13/sony-makes-the-xperia-sola-official/
1gig dual-core with a 1350mah battery sounds...interesting.
And guess what....this is a succesor season.S2 gets a successor--The samsung Galaxy S3...behold.The 1.8 Ghz Quad core processor phone...Now available as pre-order:
The Galaxy S III will come with a 4.6-inch Super AMOLED Plus touchscreen with a resolution of 720 x 1280. This means a ‘retina’ quality pixel density of 319ppi.Specifications include an Exynos 4212 quad-core 1.8GHz processor, 2GB RAM, 16GB of internal storage, a 12MP rear facing camera, a 2MP front facing camera and 4G LTE connectivity.It will also have version 4.0 of Samsung’s TouchWiz interface and we understand that it will run Google Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich.
My ACE is better than all phones
Other phones sucks! GO AHEAD GALAXY ACE!
The samsung galaxy ace 2 VS the samsung galaxy w.
These two very similar phones are driving me insane, I can't choose between them, so I could really do with some help.
Part of it comes down to lower power duelcore vs more powerful single core.
But there is also NFC capability, and how all this effects the battery?
Is powering two cores worse for the battery than powering one huge one? ram is also a concern, average vs better than? is trading processor for ram ok, how will that effect the experience?
The prices I can get them for ace 2 £220 (this price does not include unlocking it) http://www.carphonewarehouse.com/mobiles/choose-tariff/SAMSUNG_GALAXY_ACE_2/PPAY/NEW
galaxy w £230 http://www.amazon.co.uk/Samsung-I8150-Galaxy-Free-Smartphone/dp/tech-data/B005HBKGXS Help me android community, you're my only hope.
(I've been looking into it for a good while now, here's what I've found) http://geekaphone.com/compare/Samsung-Galaxy-Ace-2-vs-Samsung-GALAXY-W http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_ace_2_i8160-4559.php http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_w_i8150-4114.php http://www.phonearena.com/phones/compare/Samsung-GALAXY-Ace-2,Samsung-GALAXY-W/phones/6940,6098
Thanks for reading this far!
I've personally had the galaxy w/exhibit ii and loved it. It was fast and zippy and the screen was amazing. I think it came with a single core 1.0 GHz processor and 512 mb of RAM, so it was pretty fast specs wise. There is also a sizable amount of development for it as well. Also $200 for a phone this powerful was well worth it.
I don't know much about the galaxy ace 2, but I can personally vouched for the galaxy w.
Ace2 better than w
Sent from my GT-I8160 using xda app-developers app
I think Samsung galaxy w better, because the CPU Clock is 1,4 GHz and Ace 2 is only 800MHz. These both is NOT UPGRADEABLE TO ICS .
Elwino2.3 said:
I think Samsung galaxy w better, because the CPU Clock is 1,4 GHz and Ace 2 is only 800MHz. These both is NOT UPGRADEABLE TO ICS .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ace 2 has 800 MHz DUAL CORE
Hello!
I have purchased a Samsung Galaxy Core i8262 (dual sim) and to be honest I'm really happy with this smartphone because it is Dual Sim and lag free (or if you prefer, it has the same perfomance with a Galaxy S2 GT-i9100)
However, I am in a dilemma. I'm thinking of replacing it with Samsung Galaxy Grand because it has slightly better features.
The pros are these:
8.0 MP Camera and [email protected] video recording against 5.0 MP Camera and [email protected] Video recording
1 inch bigger screen
1.2ghz Cortex A9 vs A5 (same GHZ)
And the only con I have found is the 30euro price difference.
1) Should I replace my Samsung Galaxy Core with a Grand?
2) What have you heard about Core and Grand? which is better?
Thanks for your time
MariosFFX said:
Hello!
I have purchased a Samsung Galaxy Core i8262 (dual sim) and to be honest I'm really happy with this smartphone because it is Dual Sim and lag free (or if you prefer, it has the same perfomance with a Galaxy S2 GT-i9100)
However, I am in a dilemma. I'm thinking of replacing it with Samsung Galaxy Grand because it has slightly better features.
The pros are these:
8.0 MP Camera and [email protected] video recording against 5.0 MP Camera and [email protected] Video recording
1 inch bigger screen
1.2ghz Cortex A9 vs A5 (same GHZ)
And the only con I have found is the 30euro price difference.
1) Should I replace my Samsung Galaxy Core with a Grand?
2) What have you heard about Core and Grand? which is better?
Thanks for your time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im sure both of the devices are great phones, its really up to you, do you want a bigger screen? do you want a better camera better cpu? its up to you, if you happy with your core go ahead and keep it
MariosFFX said:
Hello!
I have purchased a Samsung Galaxy Core i8262 (dual sim) and to be honest I'm really happy with this smartphone because it is Dual Sim and lag free (or if you prefer, it has the same perfomance with a Galaxy S2 GT-i9100)
However, I am in a dilemma. I'm thinking of replacing it with Samsung Galaxy Grand because it has slightly better features.
The pros are these:
8.0 MP Camera and [email protected] video recording against 5.0 MP Camera and [email protected] Video recording
1 inch bigger screen
1.2ghz Cortex A9 vs A5 (same GHZ)
And the only con I have found is the 30euro price difference.
1) Should I replace my Samsung Galaxy Core with a Grand?
2) What have you heard about Core and Grand? which is better?
Thanks for your time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy Core is a great phone but in comparison with galaxy grand it lacks a lot of features.you should sell if u want to coz galaxy grand is an awsum phone btw currently i'm using galaxy core
Yes. Galaxy core is a par phone. But it does lag once all the messaging apps are installed.
Sent from my GT-P3100 using Tapatalk