I realize this should have been noticed forever ago.... Rogers stock supports hspa, but never was on stock long enough to notice, and up till now for ATT people to get hspa they needed to flash a reoriented i9000 kernel and i9000 modem.
guess this is why the rogers captivate is i896 instead of i897. official hspa+ support. the way the phone was designed.
so in the rogers sources would be kernel info to get official 4g support, when used with the rogers uxkh2 modem
ICS/miui/cm7 compatible zip in post 4 - hspa and audience support -the ONLY modem that supports both
i just threw together a cm7/miui/ICS flashable zip of the Rogers CAPTIVATE hspa enabled modem with Audience chip support! .
works awesome on kang ics (any cm7/miui/ics should work) on both rogers and bell sim card/networks.
enjoy an official captivate modem with hspa and audience chip support !
radio-cm7-ics-captivate-uxkh2 (rogers ginger) - http://bit.ly/LOHcsN
radio-cm7-ics-captivate-uxji2 (rogers eclair) - http://bit.ly/K0Qh1Y
radio-cm7-ics-captivate-uxjl1 (rogers froyo) - http://bit.ly/LStyqj
TRusselo said:
i just threw together a cm7/miui/ICS flashable zip of the Rogers CAPTIVATE hspa+ enabled modem with Audience chip support! . (uxkh2 modem)
works awesome on kang ics (any cm7/miui/ics should work) on both rogers and bell sim card/networks.
enjoy an official captivate modem with hspa and audience chip support ! http://bit.ly/LOHcsN
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would this work for the at& captivate?
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
I thought that audience chip support also had to be implemented in the kernel... wasn't that all the fuss about how i897 modems cannot be used with oriented i9000 kernels?
It is possible to build kernels with audience support the audience support source information is in the Rogers gingerbread source code
Some speed tests:
Bottom 3 results are ugkg3 modem. Two of those at work, the third at home. Great speeds.
Top 3 results from the Rogers captivate modem. Reasonable download speed, but upload speed sucks.
This should be tested by someone running a kk4 build maybe, with a captivate kernel. Might yield different results.
All depends on location and carrier. And came from rogers kh2 rom. And to your previous post, i never said this would work on i9000 re-oriented kernels....
and personally im not too worried about the down/up load speeds. At my new job, building a In-situ sag-d oil plant in the middle of nowhere, this is the ONLY modem that has given me any signal at all on rogers network... (when I stand in the right part of the parking lot).
imagine that.. rogers modem gives me the best signal (any signal at this location) on rogers network.
TRusselo said:
i just threw together a cm7/miui/ICS flashable zip of the Rogers CAPTIVATE hspa+ enabled modem with Audience chip support! . (uxkh2 modem)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will it work on slimICS + devil kernel ?
xtmp said:
Will it work on slimICS + devil kernel ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.
nygfan760 said:
Yes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks! I'll try it!
TRusselo said:
It is possible to build kernels with audience support the audience support source information is in the Rogers gingerbread source code
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But we don't have any CM7/ICS kernels that support it as of now
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA
but its possible to build them. the problem was people had to choose i897 kernel to get audience chip support OR i9000 kernel to get hspa (to use a i9000 modem), and most people wanted hspa more.
now we dont have to choose. we can build a captivate kernel that supports both!
^
Nice find btw on this !
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using xda premium
found some bandwidth out here at work in the bush, checked eclair and froyo rogers modems out... guess what? more hspa modems!!!!
radio-cm7-ics-captivate-uxji2 (rogers eclair) - http://bit.ly/K0Qh1Y
radio-cm7-ics-captivate-uxjl1 (rogers froyo) - http://bit.ly/LStyqj
I tested on CM9 nightly with radio-cm7-ics-captivate-uxkh2 and found the upload and ping speeds lacking, but this may differ in your area.
Best results I have gotten are with the KC1 modem.
Rogers
Toronto area
CM9 Nightly 2012-06-13
Screenshot: 1st speedtest result is using the KC1, next 2 are using the UXKH2, and the 4th is KC1 again
View attachment 1127352
Great find
I'll give it a whirl.
theaudioguy said:
Would this work for the at& captivate?
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like to know this as well
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
CheesyNutz said:
Like to know this as well
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I flashed the XHKH2 to my phone (AT&T Captivate, Running MIUI 2.3.7) and it functioned. I got decent download/upload speeds, but the call quality didn't work out for me very well (people on the other end said it was hard to understand me, lots of reverberation on my side).
In all fairness, I am in the US, so that may have something to do with it.
testing the uxkh2 I got audio problem, but only when not using handsfree or others... so I dice to enter on SamsungServiceMode and start changing settings and now people dont hear themselves but still hear the background noise high, maybe just more tweek could solve it. Any expert on SamsungServiceMode configs here? XD
Gonna try those other modem later, what mean that one is eclair and the other froyo???
Related
Which one of these two ROMs give faster use experience? I have used cognition and serendipity. I felt serendipity to be somewhat faster..please let me know
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
antonyvijai said:
Which one of these two ROMs give faster use experience? I have used cognition and serendipity. I felt serendipity to be somewhat faster..please let me know
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
IBTL.
This is subjective as all hardware is not the same. You need to find what works best for your setup and run with it.
Neither are really faster, but you have to be careful because i9000 kernels are often incompatible with captivates and your phone will behave strangely if you flash the wrong kernel.
QuarkGluonSoup said:
Neither are really faster, but you have to be careful because i9000 kernels are often incompatible with captivates and your phone will behave strangely if you flash the wrong kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I am contemplating between cognition and serendipity. Hence the thread. Yes, I know I cannot mix modems and kernels.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
cappysw10 said:
IBTL.
This is subjective as all hardware is not the same. You need to find what works best for your setup and run with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
antonyvijai said:
Thanks. I am contemplating between cognition and serendipity. Hence the thread. Yes, I know I cannot mix modems and kernels.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tend to believe since i9000 roms are always more recent (since att s**** at updates ) they will be faster , but since they were not made for captivate , less 'crisp' in some areas , all this is really subjective to the usage of the phone ..
There is middle ground here , like Andromeda and DRAGON rom , both NON based off i9000 roms neither captivate (i9010 & i9088 ) , using there original kernel you can use any modem you like , with no issues . And since there kernel did not need to be reoriented you dont lose any of the crisp , Andromeda being based of 2.2 is probably the closest to the Captivate source right now , Dragon being the latest kernel released by samsung is definitly the most stable and crisp kernel out there , there is no source for it but neither there is for the latest 2.2.1 out there either , like someone said in this thread what works best for you is what you shoudl use so dont hesitate and flash them all and please dont limit your testing to a few hours days is what you will nbeed to make up your mind ..
DAGr8 said:
I tend to believe since i9000 roms are always more recent (since att s**** at updates ) they will be faster , but since they were not made for captivate , less 'crisp' in some areas , all this is really subjective to the usage of the phone ..
There is middle gorund here , like Andromeda and DRAGON rom , both NON based off i900 roms neither captivate (i9010 & i9010 ) , using there original kernel you can use any modem you like , with no issues . And since there kernel did not need to be reoriented you dont lose any of the crisp , Andromeda being based of 2.2 is probably the closest to the Captivate source right now , Dragon being the latest kernel released by samsung is definitly the most stable and crisp kernel out there , there is no source for it but neither there is for the latest 2.2.1 out there either , like someone said in this thread what works best for you is what you shoudl use so dont hesitate and flash them all and please dont limit your testing to a few hours days is what you will nbeed to make up your mind ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
i9000 ROMs should give you faster data speeds since the use HSDPA and HSUPA (i897 ROMs use HSDPA but not HSUPA).
i897 ROMs should give you better sound quality on calls since they utilized the noise cancellation audience chip which the i9000 does not have.
As far as ROM speed itself, I do not think that is based on which source is used, but on the actual ROM itself. What I mean is not all i897 ROMs will have the same performance, and not all i9000 will have the same performance.
That is the great thing about ROMs, try different ones and use the one you like best (or switch between several you like to keep it fresh!)
bobapunk said:
i9000 ROMs should give you faster data speeds since the use HSDPA and HSUPA (i897 ROMs use HSDPA but not HSUPA).
i897 ROMs should give you better sound quality on calls since they utilized the noise cancellation audience chip which the i9000 does not have.
As far as ROM speed itself, I do not think that is based on which source is used, but on the actual ROM itself. What I mean is not all i897 ROMs will have the same performance, and not all i9000 will have the same performance.
That is the great thing about ROMs, try different ones and use the one you like best (or switch between several you like to keep it fresh!)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
bobapunk said:
i9000 ROMs should give you faster data speeds since the use HSDPA and HSUPA (i897 ROMs use HSDPA but not HSUPA).
i897 ROMs should give you better sound quality on calls since they utilized the noise cancellation audience chip which the i9000 does not have.
As far as ROM speed itself, I do not think that is based on which source is used, but on the actual ROM itself. What I mean is not all i897 ROMs will have the same performance, and not all i9000 will have the same performance.
That is the great thing about ROMs, try different ones and use the one you like best (or switch between several you like to keep it fresh!)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not necessarily the ROM that give you better sound quality or faster speed. That is in that is in the Modem and kernel. You can "basically" use any of the modems with "most" ROM's (BE VERY CAREFUL NOT ALL MIX. FOLLOW DIRECTION ON ROM THREAD). JK4 has really good speed and you can use that with most ROM's
sold1erjjt said:
It's not necessarily the ROM that give you better sound quality or faster speed. That is in that is in the Modem and kernel. You can "basically" use any of the modems with "most" ROM's (BE VERY CAREFUL NOT ALL MIX. FOLLOW DIRECTION ON ROM THREAD). JK4 has really good speed and you can use that with most ROM's
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot. I use eXistz beta 7 kernel on my cognition 4.2 ROM. Are you saying I can replace the KB1 modem? Are you recommending that I should replace KB1 with JK4. If I do that than probably I should replace my eXistz beta 7 kernel with either speedmod or suckerpunch kernels? One question is: how to do all this from CWM without doing odin back to stock and reflashing the whole stuff? Thanks
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
You can flash kernels and modems right over the rom without going to stock first.
SGS Tools is probably the easiest way.
FYI JK4 is an i9000 modem. Flashing it with a KB1 KERNEL may yield les than ideal results.
bobapunk said:
You can flash kernels and modems right over the rom without going to stock first.
SGS Tools is probably the easiest way.
FYI JK4 is an i9000 modem. Flashing it with a KB1 KERNEL may yield les than ideal results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you! So, I need to change the modem and kernel at the.same time to make sure they are compatible! Got it.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
Time to start building a collection of shipped modems. Both Odin and CWM packages will be provided for each modem.
UCKD5 - (AT&T Froyo original - 05/15/2011)
-Odin_UCKD5_Modem.zip
-CWM-UCKD5-Modem.zip
UCKE3 - (AT&T Froyo update - 06/02/2011)
-Odin_UCKE3_Modem.zip
-CWM-UCKE3-Modem.zip
UXKG3 - (Rogers Gingerbread original - 07/26/2011)
-Odin_UXKG3_Modem.zip
-CWM-UXKG3-Modem.zip
UCKI3 - (AT&T Gingerbread leak)
-CWM-UCKI3-Modem.zip
UCKI4 - (AT&T Gingerbread leak)
-CWM-UCKI4-Modem.zip
Thank you for making this thread Been waiting for this since a long time...
Waiting for UCKD5 CWM
I second that. Thank you, sir.
Sent from my Infuse using my fingers.
The size of modem.bin in both the files (UCKE3 and UCKD5) is the same -- 15,728,640 bytes.
Am not sure if all modem files are the same size or not, so putting this across to confirm myself that these two are what they are though the size is the same.
Um why do we need this? Not being a **** just wanna know
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA Premium App
tyshemi said:
Um why do we need this? Not being a **** just wanna know
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cos some hardware gets better performance on certain radios. And many, if not all, love to experiment with different modems to see what suits them best. I love one with more battery compared to one with more speed.
diablo009 said:
Cos some hardware gets better performance on certain radios. And many, if not all, love to experiment with different modems to see what suits them best. I love one with more battery compared to one with more speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank u buddy do u notice anything different between the two I didn't I thought better bat life was for sure 3 modem
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA Premium App
tyshemi said:
Thank u buddy do u notice anything different between the two I didn't I thought better bat life was for sure 3 modem
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't yet. I was waiting for these CWM flashable files. I'll slowly flash these over time n let u know. And remember, after flashing a radio, give atleast about a week's time before u try to guage battery life.
diablo009 said:
I didn't yet. I was waiting for these CWM flashable files. I'll slowly flash these over time n let u know. And remember, after flashing a radio, give atleast about a week's time before u try to guage battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh yea I'm going to try uc5 this week but I must say everyone should probably freeze there updaters if they leave uc3 that drm. Will try daily
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA Premium App
tyshemi said:
Oh yea I'm going to try uc5 this week but I must say everyone should probably freeze there updaters if they leave uc3 that drm. Will try daily
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am traveling overseas this week, so keeping the other modem too just in case cos that's the default modem. Not sure if AT&T modem will work properly or not out there.
diablo009 said:
I am traveling overseas this week, so keeping the other modem too just in case cos that's the default modem. Not sure if AT&T modem will work properly or not out there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They're both AT&T modems, the Infuse has never been sold by any other carrier. (That is going to change Tuesday...)
As to them both being the same size, that's common for partition/PROM/firmware raw images. They ARE different - different md5sums.
so what is the difference between the two?
Entropy512 said:
They're both AT&T modems, the Infuse has never been sold by any other carrier. (That is going to change Tuesday...)
As to them both being the same size, that's common for partition/PROM/firmware raw images. They ARE different - different md5sums.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Has anyone checked if there are differences beyond version strings? Then again, I don't see why you'd bother to recompile a modem to release a new firmware unless the modem had changes as well..
Just wanted to say that I've been waiting for new modems to try as the UCKE3 I was using was pretty poor in 3G performance. Where my old Captivate was getting solid 3G signals most of the time, for some reason I wasn't getting the same with the KE3 modem on my Infuse in the same locations and I was somewhat often getting only edge or no signal at all.
Having tried UCKD5 for a little bit, it seems like download speed is better and signal is much more solid so far. Need to do more testing, but I like it alot so far.
Max Sterling said:
Just wanted to say that I've been waiting for new modems to try as the UCKE3 I was using was pretty poor in 3G performance. Where my old Captivate was getting solid 3G signals most of the time, for some reason I wasn't getting the same with the KE3 modem on my Infuse in the same locations and I was somewhat often getting only edge or no signal at all.
Having tried UCKD5 for a little bit, it seems like download speed is better and signal is much more solid so far. Need to do more testing, but I like it alot so far.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 to this. Looks like the signal is more stable in KD5 radio. Gotta see how it goes. Will report back after a day or two.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using XDA App
Trying it now
Had some serious issues with car bluetooth today morning on UCKD5... to the extent where I deleted the device and added it back. Getting back to UCKE3.
araemo said:
Has anyone checked if there are differences beyond version strings? Then again, I don't see why you'd bother to recompile a modem to release a new firmware unless the modem had changes as well..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty much not possible without major decompiler/disassembler experience.
The radios might even be encrypted.
Most likely E3 has a bunch of bugfixes not present in D5 since it's newer.
Entropy512 said:
Most likely E3 has a bunch of bugfixes not present in D5 since it's newer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was my gut feeling too... E3 is an improvised version of D5.
Flashed UCKD5 modem
The building I work in is notorious for killing the signal. I flashed the UCKD5 modem yesterday and so far it seems that I have better signal than with UCKE3. Will run this modem for a few days more then will try the other. I sometimes wonder what I'd accomplish if I weren't a phone junkie
With the 7.1 release the other day and all the newly supported devices, I kinda felt like the GS4G was the red headed step-child.
I brainstormed... what is the best way to get CM7+ on our device?
Best result I could come up with was to ask the guys who helped get it on the OG Vibrant.
Their response was abbreviated. (A) do it myself (not possible) or (B) get them a device.
Well, I guess that leaves trying to figure out how to get a device into the hands of an official CM team developer
OR
Coming up with a better idea.
I am soliciting advice/feedback for either of these two options.
EDIT:
Just realized my thread title is pretty misleading... but if it helps get views, sorry. It was not intentional, promise
EDIT 2:
I should also point out that I have been sending tweets to Samsung / and their support, for kernel source.
so they don't need the samsung to release the official GB for our device? cuz the source code for GB kernel will be available after that
we need the gb kernel source... mabe cough samsung cough leak us some kernel source instead of updateing the rom every 2 days
I don't think we need kernel source at all. CM and Miui are both on the Vibrant and it doesn't have any GB source because, well, there is no GB for the Vibrant.
The SGS4G and Vibrant are so similar I think a CM dev could get this working NP with the help of a couple users. But hey, what do I know?
RaverX3X said:
we need the gb kernel source... mabe cough samsung cough leak us some kernel source instead of updateing the rom every 2 days
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We always say this. Can't smmy be nice enough to leak us some source?
Also the vibrant section got more kernel developers than us. We only got one atm
Whitehawkx said:
I don't think we need kernel source at all. CM and Miui are both on the Vibrant and it doesn't have any GB source because, well, there is no GB for the Vibrant.
The SGS4G and Vibrant are so similar I think a CM dev could get this working NP with the help of a couple users. But hey, what do I know?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol just was trying to get some kernel source it can be done with the stock kernel just going to have to do alot of fenessing of the rom ;P
it'll be different that the vibrant CM kernel. This is due to the source being COMPLETELY different. I've diff'd the sources, and nothing matches up.
The vibrant is using a modified I9K GB source. That is what is making it work.
As far as using the stock kernel, sure, we can do that, but it would have to be modified for every update, and nightlies... yeah, you can forget about that. RFS/EXT4 wont be added as an official CM build due to it will break the i9k/cap/fascinate/vib builds.
Once I get a new 4G, I'll continue working on the kernel/build.
krylon360 said:
it'll be different that the vibrant CM kernel. This is due to the source being COMPLETELY different. I've diff'd the sources, and nothing matches up.
The vibrant is using a modified I9K GB source. That is what is making it work.
As far as using the stock kernel, sure, we can do that, but it would have to be modified for every update, and nightlies... yeah, you can forget about that. RFS/EXT4 wont be added as an official CM build due to it will break the i9k/cap/fascinate/vib builds.
Once I get a new 4G, I'll continue working on the kernel/build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
let me know if u get one or not if u are cough in my area again cough il just have u pick it up snece they were kind enough to get enough money to have me buy one
Krylon, have you looked at the galaxy s 2 kernel source for comparisons?
It may have similarities.
airfluip1 said:
Krylon, have you looked at the galaxy s 2 kernel source for comparisons?
It may have similarities.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you mean besides the sgs2 uses quallcoms snapdragon processer
sgs4g uses hummingbird
diffrent mounts
etc etc etc
Fail to Samsung. Dumped their own processor.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
CM7 would be awesome for the SGS4G.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using xda premium
airfluip1 said:
Fail to Samsung. Dumped their own processor.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was Tmobile's decision. The Exynos processor didn't support Tmobiles 42mb HSPA+ network, I think the Exynos maxed out at 21. So that's why tmobile opted for the Snapdragon as it supported the 42mb HSPA+.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using xda premium
Let me just say.. its great to see so many devs in one thread..
sent from my real Gs move in silence like lasagna
honestly once we get a source for hte kernel
the phone will get better honestly
cm7 miui darkeys etc properly lol
I would love cm7 on my phone. Let's start a phone fund for krylon and/or the cm guys.
mackster248 said:
It was Tmobile's decision. The Exynos processor didn't support Tmobiles 42mb HSPA+ network, I think the Exynos maxed out at 21. So that's why tmobile opted for the Snapdragon as it supported the 42mb HSPA+.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But what's the point of it being able to support that speed when the network doesn't even get close to that fast? And do we really need speeds that high especially with the data cap? My phone averages 10 down and 5 up, which is MUCH more than what I need.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
a major percentage of overall data use on smartphones involve streaming media.. and that number has skyrocketed over the past few years.. yes browsing xda and the web is fast on the gsg4g, but you really see the differences when downloading large files and streaming
icy56 said:
But what's the point of it being able to support that speed when the network doesn't even get close to that fast? And do we really need speeds that high especially with the data cap? My phone averages 10 down and 5 up, which is MUCH more than what I need.
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sent from my real Gs move in silence like lasagna
Wait if the vibrant doesnt even.have gingerbread... How did they get the source kernel? And why do we need it?
Sent from my SGH-T959V using XDA App
Mike1 - Awesome ROM..Thank you.
2 Questions: Why does ROM toogle between 3G/H signal? Stock ROM connect to 4G(H).
Some download from MARKET would come up insufficient memory and fail to down load. Is there a fix? I reboot but still does not resolve.
jc-gtablet said:
Mike1 - Awesome ROM..Thank you.
2 Questions: Why does ROM toogle between 3G/H signal? Stock ROM connect to 4G(H).
Some download from MARKET would come up insufficient memory and fail to down load. Is there a fix? I reboot but still does not resolve.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Might want to flash a different rom. The dev for that one is jumping to a different phone. As you can see the latest version of serendipity is way over a month old. You will get better support from a dev/rom that is still fully supported.
Sent from my Samsung Infuse
jc-gtablet said:
Mike1 - Awesome ROM..Thank you.
2 Questions: Why does ROM toogle between 3G/H signal? Stock ROM connect to 4G(H).
Some download from MARKET would come up insufficient memory and fail to down load. Is there a fix? I reboot but still does not resolve.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depending on the area your in, stock or custom, the phone will always toggle between the two. The stock rom just doesn't show it doing so. If you aren't in an area that has 4G, obviously your phone will take advantage of whatever is available.
---------- Post added at 10:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:33 PM ----------
slapshot30 said:
Might want to flash a different rom. The dev for that one is jumping to a different phone. As you can see the latest version of serendipity is way over a month old. You will get better support from a dev/rom that is still fully supported.
Sent from my Samsung Infuse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, but with GB so close, I'm sure we will get a boost in development with new roms to choose from..I wouldn't worry about an outdated rom, for now, S7 is great even if outdated. I mean its not like an Hdmi fix is gonna come till GB anyway lol
S7 Supports
WTF..I was looking forward to new update. Other ROM have alot issues.. Is there a recommenedation out there?
learner0910 said:
WTF..I was looking forward to new update. Other ROM have alot issues.. Is there a recommenedation out there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're not really likely to see anything other than Hellraised I9000/Captivate ROMs until after AT&T Gingerbread drops.
So what if it hasn't been updated since initial release? It was created by Hellraising a highly refined and mature Captivate ROM. There's nowhere it really can go until we get official AT&T Gingerbread. At that point you'll likely be able to get nearly all of the benefits by flashing over another Hellraiser update.
I was originally going to try and do kernel development over UCKJ1 in order to backport some stuff to the Infuse Daily Driver series I've added to the GSII version, but it's looking like I may just return to S7 for that work. So when DD development resumes, S7 will likely be the ROM it's tested against until official AT&T GB hits.
I have run S7 off and on while trying to teach myself about ROM creation/modding, and S7 has always jumped back and forth for me in areas where I am right on the edge of good HSPA+ signal. It's fairly normal and if it's annoying you can always set your your phone to restrict to one network or the other.....but I wouldn't recommend it. I'd just be careful how much data you auto-sync if it switches a LOT as bad signal areas + background data can mean extra battery drain.
jc-gtablet said:
Mike1 - Awesome ROM..Thank you.
2 Questions: Why does ROM toogle between 3G/H signal? Stock ROM connect to 4G(H).
Some download from MARKET would come up insufficient memory and fail to down load. Is there a fix? I reboot but still does not resolve.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess since no one technically answered your questions I will.
1. Because S7 is true to what you are connected to, whether umts (3g) or hspa+ (H) and that fluctuates normally where ever you are. Stock ROM always said either H+ (at&t) or 4G (rogers) regardless of whether you were connected to "4G" or 3G.
2. It is a known bug with the new market and has nothing to do with the ROM.
S7 is in no way outdated ....it may be over a month old but that's because it works so damn good...plus Mikey has said he will do one final update when official gingerbread cones out.
Anything you would consider more up to date is using leak stuff from ucki3 or 4....which kinda sucks anyway...
Sent from my Samsung Infuse 4G - 1.6ghz
SSJ_Gomike said:
I guess since no one technically answered your questions I will.
1. Because S7 is true to what you are connected to, whether umts (3g) or hspa+ (H) and that fluctuates normally where ever you are. Stock ROM always said either H+ (at&t) or 4G (rogers) regardless of whether you were connected to "4G" or 3G.
2. It is a known bug with the new market and has nothing to do with the ROM.
S7 is in no way outdated ....it may be over a month old but that's because it works so damn good...plus Mikey has said he will do one final update when official gingerbread cones out.
Anything you would consider more up to date is using leak stuff from ucki3 or 4....which kinda sucks anyway...
Sent from my Samsung Infuse 4G - 1.6ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
About the only improvement I can think of right now for S7 would be integrating the camera library fixes into the download.
That's it... That and the TCP buffer fixes in the initramfs (which you can get just by flashing a newer kernel) are the only good things that came out of UCKI3/I4.
Entropy512 said:
About the only improvement I can think of right now for S7 would be integrating the camera library fixes into the download.
That's it... That and the TCP buffer fixes in the initramfs (which you can get just by flashing a newer kernel) are the only good things that came out of UCKI3/I4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True....forgot about the camera files as I just pushed them myself...but it would definitely be easier if they were included..
As for the buffer fixes....you said newer kernels have it, does that include bedwa's newest one?
Sent from my Samsung Infuse 4G - 1.6ghz
SSJ_Gomike said:
True....forgot about the camera files as I just pushed them myself...but it would definitely be easier if they were included..
As for the buffer fixes....you said newer kernels have it, does that include bedwa's newest one?
Sent from my Samsung Infuse 4G - 1.6ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bedwa included it in his latest release
Quick question guys. I have the rogers infuse 4g unlocked and on another carrier that is 4g but never get 4g showing..it's always on 3g. I'm in a 4g zone so I don't know whats up. apn related? or is it because I'm unlocked and with another carrier?
Thanks for the help in advance
Not sure if its me or the ROM
I recently rooted and installed serendipity. Which I love and works great. Its been like a week...love it.
BUT i don't really normally make or receive alot of calls. I did read the part about your first call not having sound, tried the speaker toggle, all is well. While Im making calls. But I cant receive calls. lol
It makes a crazy sound then says "NO SERVICE" for several minutes. But everything else works great!
Now im not actually using AT&T im using H2O
Any help is appreciated
---------- Post added at 12:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:52 PM ----------
PS I wouldnt have posted without reading the entire thread BUT im at work as that is the only place I have internet right now and am trying to do this on the d/l lol. So I apologize if it was addressed and I just missed it.
This is a port of the miui.us 2.4.13 rom to work with the new baseband v21y.
This is a GB 2.3.7 rom based on CM7. I have left it as stock as possible. Just add some CM7.2 RC3 updates and make it work on v21y March 2012 BB.
Code:
Changelog
06-07-12
*added cm7 rc3 updates
*removed Miui.us apps
*removed gapps
*added wifi calling
*added v21y support
01-23-13
* fix SD card issue.
Code:
To Do List
*Change "G" to "4G"
*Fix Wifi Calling
*Add Scrollable Wigets
*Any suggestion?""
* Mount Internal Storage on External SD card folder "_InternalSD" thanks to azyan for letting me know
Code:
Credits
[URL="http://roms.miui.us/romsnippet.php?device=p999"]Miui.us[/URL]
[URL="http://rootzwiki.com/topic/13194-dev-how-to-port-o2x-miui-to-g2x-instructions/"]Whitehawkx Guide[/URL]
[URL="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=26935107&postcount=3"]Rafase282 for his guide and pointing me to it. He is awesome[/URL]
[URL="http://www.cyanogenmod.com/devices/t-mobile-g2x"]Cyangenmod for there great work.[/URL]
[URL="http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1144553"]death1246 for is work on mounting the sdcard to _internal [/URL]
If i forget to credit anyone I am sorry please let me know and i will add you.
Use at your own risk. I take no responsibility for what you do to your phone.
If you would like to donate please do so to any or all of the credits i have mention there work made this possible for me to do. Without people like them I would have a broke stock phone.
Miui P999 V21y 06-07-12 - Download
I don't have T-mobile Service anymore but still have the phone. It isn't working right now touchscreen cracked. I can't test the rom.
Miui P999 V21y 01-23-13 - Download Mirror #1 removed Do to issue will fix to day
Google apps are post everywhere just find one for GB and use it.
just in case I need it
Thanks another Miui rom. I will try this later. :thumbup:
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Nice, but may i say that in your future plans it says to change G to 4g? G is actually GPRS, which is a form of data lower than edge(2g). You probably meant to say HSPA+ to 4g, because HSPA+ is T-Mobile's form of "4G"
daygen4545 said:
Nice, but may i say that in your future plans it says to change G to 4g? G is actually GPRS, which is a form of data lower than edge(2g). You probably meant to say HSPA+ to 4g, because HSPA+ is T-Mobile's form of "4G"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPRS_Core_Network
Thought that was how WCDMA worked. G2x does HSPA not +.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
lanlee212 said:
? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPRS_Core_Network
Thought that was how WCDMA worked. G2x does HSPA not +.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When you see G on the phone, it is because no 3G, or 2G signal is available, and the only signal available is GPRS, which has a data transfer rate of 56-114 kbps, which is definitely not 4G. T-Mobile's version of 4G, Which is HSPA+, on the G2x has a theoretical transfer rate of 21 mbps. I have never even seen the HSPA+ logo on any other ROM than complete stock, even though people are saying that CyanogenMod made a change to differentiate HSPA and HSPA+. What would be helpful to some people though, would be if you changed E to 2G, and H to 3G, Because more people are probably used to that, and personally i like that naming scheme better, it's less confusing.
(If you want to check out my source, I think your article was a general GPRS for all GSM communications, Here's what i used:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Packet_Radio_Service
daygen4545 said:
When you see G on the phone, it is because no 3G, or 2G signal is available, because GPRS, has a data transfer rate of 56-114 kbps. T-Mobile's version of 4G, Which is HSPA+, on the G2x has a theoretical transfer rate of 21 mbps. I have never even seen the HSPA+ logo on any other ROM than complete stock, even though people are saying that CyanogenMod made a change to differentiate HSPA and HSPA+. What would be helpful to some people though, would be if you changed E to 2G, and H to 3G, Because more people are probably used to that, and personally i like that naming scheme better, it's less confusing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
14.4 not 21
Also, why does every MIUI rom remove gapps? Are gapps causing problems with MIUI? I'm new to MIUI so pardon my noob question.
Gapps not supppose to be in any rom, not even in cm7 due to copyright issue and some other issue i forgot.
Sent via G2X-SINGH-UI
nycelitemaster said:
Gapps not supppose to be in any rom, not even in cm7 due to copyright issue and some other issue i forgot.
Sent via G2X-SINGH-UI
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google only want the apps on released device they approved. Since cm7 or miui isn't approved for our phone we can't include them. On stock roms its OK since Google approved the use on Google apps on them.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
daygen4545 said:
When you see G on the phone, it is because no 3G, or 2G signal is available, and the only signal available is GPRS, which has a data transfer rate of 56-114 kbps, which is definitely not 4G. T-Mobile's version of 4G, Which is HSPA+, on the G2x has a theoretical transfer rate of 21 mbps. I have never even seen the HSPA+ logo on any other ROM than complete stock, even though people are saying that CyanogenMod made a change to differentiate HSPA and HSPA+. What would be helpful to some people though, would be if you changed E to 2G, and H to 3G, Because more people are probably used to that, and personally i like that naming scheme better, it's less confusing.
(If you want to check out my source, I think your article was a general GPRS for all GSM communications, Here's what i used:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Packet_Radio_Service
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The odd part miui shows hspa connects as "G" along with UMTS connection. So it just a miui labeling issue
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
I flashed the cm LG camera mod and it works flawlessly on this rom.
You just have to wait a bit for "media scanner " to finish its thing.
I confirm it to be like all the other miui roms with "invalid sim"... other then that its a pretty good miui rom.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
buru898 said:
I flashed the cm LG camera mod and it works flawlessly on this rom.
You just have to wait a bit for "media scanner " to finish its thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you talking about this cam or the stock CM one?
Rafase282 said:
Are you talking about this cam or the stock CM one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This seems to be the link.. ( http://www.mediafire.com/?yigbp18p7imat6h). Working very well.
homerxd said:
This seems to be the link.. ( http://www.mediafire.com/?yigbp18p7imat6h). Working very well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the direct link but could you possibly point me to the source?
Sorry.. I got that zip from this thread couple of days back. I don't know what source has been used to generate that file. I wonder if there was a released source for that, as it is LG custom camera.
homerxd said:
Sorry.. I got that zip from this thread couple of days back. I don't know what source has been used to generate that file. I wonder if there was a released source for that, as it is LG custom camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry by source I meant, the thread where you go it from where I could find more info and maybe source code but mostly the thread where I can get more info about it if needed.
Rafase282 said:
Sorry by source I meant, the thread where you go it from where I could find more info and maybe source code but mostly the thread where I can get more info about it if needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This seems to be the closest I could find so far...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1603990
This seems to be original post
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=21956617&postcount=1639
One more discussion link
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1475912
Rafase282 said:
Sorry by source I meant, the thread where you go it from where I could find more info and maybe source code but mostly the thread where I can get more info about it if needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not entirely sure, but I believe this is might be that camera mod:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=24955882
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Thanks, digging throught those post I found it and the updated version aswell. Going to test it now. If it works better than the CM cam I'll use it instead for my builds.