PowerVR SGX540 vs Adreno 220 - HTC Sensation
which for the best for gaming?and how to know how many mhz they running on 2D n 3D?
as i found that my htc sensation xe running adreno220 1.5ghz compare to my gf samsung galaxy s2 i9100g which running PowerVR SGX540 at 1.2 ghz only but the result is it faster and smoother than mine== lol
I had HTC Evo3d with adreno 220 and now i have Galaxy s2 G version with powervr.i cant talk about gaming but in quadrant i get 61 Fps with s2 while it was about half of that with evo.its smoother overall in graphics.i get 60fps in nenamark 1 and 36.9 in nenamark 2.keep in my that these results are on gingerbread.ICS surly will raise them
josephnero said:
I had HTC Evo3d with adreno 220 and now i have Galaxy s2 G version with powervr.i cant talk about gaming but in quadrant i get 61 Fps with s2 while it was about half of that with evo.its smoother overall in graphics.i get 60fps in nenamark 1 and 36.9 in nenamark 2.keep in my that these results are on gingerbread.ICS surly will raise them
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
from benchmark sure s2g win as the low resolution,but i tot only benchmark but it is not,in real performance seem it also faster than my xe,is anyone else can confirm this with me?
is power VR in the sgs2 overclocked just like galaxy nexus?
for the nenamark2 results:
my sensation XE 42 fps (266mhz, downclocked by htc)
Samsung galaxy s2 with mali400 59 fps (300 mhz,4core version)
galaxy nexus with OCed powerVR 540 24 fps (400mhz, on the 720p screen)
Galaxy note with mali400 51 fps (300 mhz i güreş on the 720p screen)
When the XE is overclocked to 300 mhz i have 49 and for the 320 mhz i have 53 fps values..
So i guess 37 fps with powerVR is pretty good..
_delice_doluca_ said:
is power VR in the sgs2 overclocked just like galaxy nexus?
for the nenamark2 results:
my sensation XE 42 fps (266mhz, downclocked by htc)
Samsung galaxy s2 with mali400 59 fps (300 mhz,4core version)
galaxy nexus with OCed powerVR 540 24 fps (400mhz, on the 720p screen)
Galaxy note with mali400 51 fps (300 mhz i güreş on the 720p screen)
When the XE is overclocked to 300 mhz i have 49 and for the 320 mhz i have 53 fps values..
So i guess 37 fps with powerVR is pretty good..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its clocked at 320mhz while galaxy nexus is at 384mhz
With all the worthless quadrants/fps aside. My sensation cm9 plays every game smooth. Mass effect, modern combat 3, gta3 and clocked @ 1.188
mulletcutter said:
With all the worthless quadrants/fps aside. My sensation cm9 plays every game smooth. Mass effect, modern combat 3, gta3 and clocked @ 1.188
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so does my stock S2
josephnero said:
so does my stock S2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, my s2 does same. With a just a slight bigger screen
josephnero said:
its clocked at 320mhz while galaxy nexus is at 384mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong. The Galaxy Nexus is stock at 300Mhz. Google downclocked the CPU & GPU...
At 384 Mhz (the way the chip was designed) it scores in nenamark 29FPS.
At 512 Mhz it scores 40 FPS.
R: PowerVR SGX540 vs Adreno 220
ansonchan said:
which for the best for gaming?and how to know how many mhz they running on 2D n 3D?
as i found that my htc sensation xe running adreno220 1.5ghz compare to my gf samsung galaxy s2 i9100g which running PowerVR SGX540 at 1.2 ghz only but the result is it faster and smoother than mine== lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are U kidding? Samsung uses mali gpus and not powerVR! However, comparing Samsung to Qualcomm is the same to compare AMD to intel.
Sent from the XxXSensationXxX
josephnero said:
so does my stock S2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You came all the way here, just to post that?
We need to test two phones at same resolution and Ghz on the processors but, always will be a advantage because a processor is not only the speed that is clocked at, it does have a build construction tecnology expressed in Nm (22nm for example for the newers) and a cache size and speed...
The exynos in one side has 1mb of cache and the Snapdragon S3 has a 512mhz but clocked at higher frequency... Also the TiOmap 4460 from galaxy nexus has a 1mb of L2 cache size...
these are things to take in mind when we compare GPUs because not only the GPU does all the work...
Also, can we remember that a phone with 512mb of ram has only 384 capable to use? because the rest of the memory is used as Vram, so the speed and size of the ram is important also...
Which rom is the best for gaming? I tried gta 3 on viper 1.6.3 but it is not smooth. Nfs mw runs ok.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda app-developers app
I don't like samsung phone.Because its processer is terrible
careslo said:
Which rom is the best for gaming? I tried gta 3 on viper 1.6.3 but it is not smooth. Nfs mw runs ok.
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use Elegancia 4.1 3.4.1 and bricked kernel, it runs temple run 2, epic citadel, race of champions increible smooth.. getting 47fps with nenamark2, and with Jelly bean 4.1.2 CM10 i get 50.2 fps with nenamark2 and the same results for other kernels...
Completely stock HTC Sensation XE - ICS 4.0.3 Sense 3.6
Nenamark1 - 60.4 FPS
Nenamark2 - 47.2 FPS
@960x540px
XxXPachaXxX said:
Are U kidding? Samsung uses mali gpus and not powerVR! However, comparing Samsung to Qualcomm is the same to compare AMD to intel.
Sent from the XxXSensationXxX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my S2 is a g version.uses T omap4.Samsung is selling it on some select markets.Google i9100g
Sent from my GT-I9100G using xda premium
---------- Post added at 04:37 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:35 AM ----------
Sgt.Incontro said:
You came all the way here, just to post that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no.I have adreno 220(xperia Ion) and power vr (g s2g) at the same time.so talking about some observations
Sent from my GT-I9100G using xda premium
the low resolution really helps powerVR but in HD resolution I am almost sure Adreno 220 would perform better
Sent from my GT-I9100G using xda premium
If you want to compare these two gpus the colosest to fair comparison is comparing sensation xe and Huawei p1. P1 has SGX540 GPU paired with a 1.5ghz CPU and 920x560px resolution, its nenamark is 36.7 on ics 4.0.3. Pretty low, maybe it was nenamark 2 but It's still less than Adreno 220 at qhd resolution.
Related
Galaxy beam overclock issue
Hi If you overclock the galaxy beam to 1ghz you ll experience green lines and green pixels when recording video in HD. drop oc to 800 mhz and it ll be all fine Sent from my GT-I8520 using XDA App
Most RAM intensive and gpu and processor intensive apps
Can you plz gimme a list of most ram, cpu, gpu intensive apps that can even run on overclocked galaxy fit like devices?? Sent from my GT-S5670 using XDA
Another bugs?
Well, if I run the antutu benchmark, it was good, 2d and 3d test runs smoothly with 60 fps at average, I always got score above 5200 But in some conditions, the 2d test is 45 fps at average and the 3d test is 35 fps at average, the 3d test was SO SLOW!! The slow isAlmost the same when I run this app with my Xperia X8 And the cpu freq is always 1134 mhz Is it the app's bug, or the phone's bug? I'm using Sensation XE original ICS with hboot 1.27.000 Sent from my HTC Sensation XE with Beats Audio Z715e using xda premium
Reason is simple... Benchmark programs extensively uses cpu and gpu.. So they should be given some rest after the use and then should be tested again Thus When You run benchmark programs you always give a gap of 5 minutes.. Then do the test again.. Sent from my HTC Sensation 4G using xda premium
AnTuTu Benchmark - Different Hardware
Hellos guys Just for curiosity, what's your scores on AnTuTu ? mine is 10681, but the other devices, c2104 make 11k~12k another thing, AnTuTu shows this hardware: CPU:MSM8930 MTP Dual Core ARMv7 Frequency: 384~1026 MHz Resolution: 480 x 782 Screen: 240 dpi RAM: 777 MB the ones in bold, should be: Resolution: 480 x 854 RAM: 1 GB About RAM, i don't know if AnTuTu shows 777MB because the other 300 MB is reserved for system. Free Memory is about 250~300MB About Resolution, i don't know what to think o.o somebody have the same "problem" ? OBS: I'm in Brazil, so I don't know if devices here are poorer of hardware. OBS2: Sorry for my English.
guiips said: Hellos guys Just for curiosity, what's your scores on AnTuTu ? mine is 10681, but the other devices, c2104 make 11k~12k another thing, AnTuTu shows this hardware: CPU:MSM8930 MTP Dual Core ARMv7 Frequency: 384~1026 MHz Resolution: 480 x 782 Screen: 240 dpi RAM: 777 MB the ones in bold, should be: Resolution: 480 x 854 RAM: 1 GB About RAM, i don't know if AnTuTu shows 777MB because the other 300 MB is reserved for system. Free Memory is about 250~300MB About Resolution, i don't know what to think o.o somebody have the same "problem" ? OBS: I'm in Brazil, so I don't know if devices here are poorer of hardware. OBS2: Sorry for my English. Click to expand... Click to collapse The screen shows 480x782 because the rest of the screen is for the on screen buttons... Sent from my C2105 using xda app-developers app
My C2105 this is my Sony XL with cyanogenmod 11 + ThunderZap kernel; OC'd to 1.6 and performance governer.
Cm12 + tz 4.8 Though it can oc Sent from my C2105 using XDA Free mobile app
[APP][2.3+]GPU Benchmark tool
Hello guys, This is a benchmark app for android i made about a week ago with Unity. I was curious about the scores you guys get with this benchmark app. My nexus 5 gives me about 11000. It would be great if you guys post your score below, it really helps me out. Also can you guys check if the scores are consistent? Maybe i can add charts in the app if I have enough device scores. Download link via Google Play: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.kortenoeverdev.GPUbench Download link APK: https://mega.co.nz/#!W8BmhQwY!RIrchxILdHPea0eBOtPaoF2fHVVUCqgG7_thd29GYl0 OR:https://app.box.com/s/7khk9egpnifqiyoktflj Current device scores: NOTE: these scores are not normalized by the screen resolution NOT OVERCLOCKED Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) : 15088 Nexus 10 : 14675 LG G2 : 13161 Samsung Galaxy Note 2 : 13008 Samsung Galaxy S3 : 12156 LG nexus 5 : 11854 Xperia z1 : 11935 Samsung Galaxy s2 GT9100 : 9660 LG nexus 4 :8808 Acer Liquid E2 (V370) : 7837 HTC One S : 7346 Motorola razr xt910 : 7004 Sony Xperia T : 6800 Xperia Tablet Z : 6436 Samsung Galaxy nexus : 6389 Nexus 7 2012 : 6182 Sony Xperia TX : 6108 Samsumg Galaxy Tab 3 7" : 5959 Samsung Galaxy S3 mini : 5612 Samsung Galaxy Note : 5049 HTC sensation : 4934 Samsung galaxy ace 2: 4787 Huawei Ascend P6 : 4616 Samsung Galaxy Exhibit : 2337 Motorola Droid X : 2160 Kyocera Rise : 1698 OVERCLOCKED Nexus 7 (2013) CM 10.2 DJLamontagneiii CPU OC 2.052Ghz, GPU OC 627Mhz : 26498 Samsung Galaxy Note 2, GPU 644 CPU 1800: 14555 Xperia S GPU overclocked : 5463 HTC Sensation 1.5 GHz GPU 300 : 5062 UPDATE V 1.1.0: - Calculating avg bug fix - Added a screen resolution normalized score - Screen stays on during benchmark test Some screenshots in the attachments Thank you!
kortenoeverdev said: Hello guys, This is a benchmark app for android i made about a week ago with Unity. I was curious about the scores you guys get with this benchmark app. My nexus 5 gives me about 11000. It would be great if you guys post your score below, it really helps me out. Also can you guys check if the scores are consistent? Maybe i can add charts in the app if I have enough device scores. Download link: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.kortenoeverdev.GPUbench Some screenshots in the attachments Thank you! Click to expand... Click to collapse Hi, Getting 13,0008 points, 104.6s on N7105 with omnirom nightly. not overclocked etc.
jdstrydom said: Hi, Getting 13,0008 points, 104.6s on N7105 with omnirom nightly. not overclocked etc. Click to expand... Click to collapse Hmm, interesting result. Thank you very much! My Xperia T scores 6800
Samsung Galaxy s2 GT9100 9660 points / 105.8s FPS: lowest 14.30 highest 94.71 avg 40.88
Bit lower than my previous result. This result is with Devil kernel devil2 2.0.1. It seems the newer mali drivers of the agni kernel used previously makes quite a difference. Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 4
EatPlayLoveIt said: Samsung Galaxy s2 GT9100 9660 points / 105.8s FPS: lowest 14.30 highest 94.71 avg 40.88 Click to expand... Click to collapse S2 with that score? 0.o Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Last post back on agni with gpu oc to 644 and kernel on oc 1800. Gpu and cpu oc sure makes a difference on fps Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 4
Any more people who would like to share their results?
Samsung Galaxy S3 (see signature) >>> 12156
It seems like Samsung devices score higher than other devices. Does anyone have a device that is not Samsung and wants to post his/her score?
kortenoeverdev said: It seems like Samsung devices score higher than other devices. Does anyone have a device that is not Samsung and wants to post his/her score? Click to expand... Click to collapse Here you go I ran the test on my Xperia TX with a bunch of junk running in the background. No tweaks or OC. Great app by the way
Here's mine, stock Nexus 5. Few days old 11.6k points. Also, when your performing the test the back light fades whereafter the screen turns off.
15.088 points on Note 10.1 2014 stock
Stock nexus 5 Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Xperia S with custom kernel. Adreno 220 overclocked. 5,463 points Time Elapsed: 111.3fps Lowest: 7.08fps Highest: 74.47fps Avg: 24.02fps
Here is mine. Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
LGE Nexus 4 I ran a few benchmarks and got an average of 6145 Nexus 4 Stock, unrooted 4.4.2 ART runtime
6389 points on Gnex CM11 Nightly
Here is my score, LG G2 - rooted, stockrom.
Here's mine i Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda app-developers app